Allah in the Quran, Chapter 83

 

Chapter 83

ALLAH AND NON-MUSLIMS

 

001 This is how the Quran evaluates non-Muslims. Strictly religious Muslims often judge even harsher - in Pakistan there a few years ago was a debate about if a non-Muslim had half the human value of a Muslim or less. A bit special debate from people belonging to a religion only built on a book so full of mistakes and worse, that no god ever was involved in the delivery of it. Not even a devil would deliver a fake holy book of that quality to trap humans, because he had to know the errors would be discovered sooner or later, and he lose credibility - well, not unless he was forced by a stronger something - a god - to do so to give humans with a little brain a reasonable chance to see the trap.

002 On top of all, the stories/book are/is delivered by a man who liked power and riches - riches at least for bribes for more power - and women. And a man who openly admitted that he accepted and used dishonesty, deception, betrayal, and even broken oaths (2/225, 5/89,16/61, 66/2) as ok working tools. (But his followers say: "Oh, he cheated and deceived, ok, because that is said and even boasted of in the Quran and in Hadiths. But a good and honest saintly man like him did not cheat us - f.x. into making raid parties and armies for him to give him more riches and power". No comments - and none necessary.)

003 But you may have noticed that also when it came to non-Muslims and how bad they were and what punishment they were to expect, Muhammad was unable to prove even one single of his words. If the old books, included the Quran, tell the truth about this, Jesus several times proved that a supernatural power was involved. But Muhammad? - only fast words and nothing.

004 Also see 2/88c shortly below - a most central fact: ########The Bible is proved by science not to have been falsified. (But then Muhammad also never had a proof for that claim - just like for all his other central claims.) THIS AMONG OTHER THINGS PROVE THAT ALL CLAIMS IN THE QURAN, HADITHS, ETC. ABOUT FALSIFICATIONS IN THE BIBLE, ARE PROVED WRONG. IT ALSO PROVE 100% - IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER PROOFS - THAT EACH PLACE WHERE THERE ARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE BIBLE AND THE QURAN, IT IS THE QURAN WHICH IS WRONG.

Finally: Always when you read the Quran, Hadiths, and other Islamic books, you should remember that Muhammad accepted the use of and himself used dishonesty in many forms in words and deeds. Even if the names are younger, it was he who institutionalized dishonesty like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing), the use of deceit ("war is deceit" - and "everything" is war), betrayal (f.x. the peace delegation from Khaybar), and even the disuse of oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah could cheat, cheating is ok)), which also includes the disuse of words and promises, as they are weaker than oaths = when oaths can be disused, so can words and promises. On top of this it is very clear from the Quran and all other central Islamic books, that Muhammad also liked respect and power and women. Combine these lusts with his acceptance of and personal use of dishonesty - even the gravest kinds: How reliable are that kind of men normally? - and how true and reliable are their never proved claims and tales?

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

005 2/44c: "Will ye (Jews*) not understand?". Most likely that just was the problem: The Jews understood that Yahweh and Allah could not be the same god - and that something was wrong with Muhammad's new religion. Much wrong.

006 2/88c: "Nay, Allah’s curse is on them (non-Muslims, here likely the Jews of Medina*) for their blasphemy: little do they believe". The Quran here claims that the reason why they did not believe in Muhammad, was that Allah had cursed them - psychologically a much better story for Muhammad to tell his followers than the plain reality: The Jews understood from their knowledge of the old scriptures how wrong Muhammad's teachings and his claim that Yahweh and Allah were the same god were. As everyone knows, Muhammad claimed that the discrepancies between the Torah, etc. and the Quran were because the Jews and Christians had falsified the books - his only possible way out if he wanted to save his religion and his own position. Science and even more so Islam later have proved this claim wrong by being unable to prove one single falsification among literally tens of thousands of relevant old manuscripts (the numbers wary some, but some 300 Gospels or fragments of Gospels, some 13ooo scriptures or fragments from the Bible, and some 32,000 other manuscripts with quotes from or references to the Bible, all older than 610 AD when Muhammad started his new religion, and thus before there was a reason for falsifying Muhammad and his teachings out - Islam has been unable to prove any point at all in them falsified. Further it is proved that the present Bible and its scriptures are identical to the same scriptures in the old times, except for minor discrepancies normal for hand-written manuscripts.

For OT there also is the combination of Jesus and the Qumran scrolls. Both the Bible and the Quran witness that Jesus was a very reliable person, and according to the Quran all prophets (included Jesus of course) also received a correct copy of the scriptures from heaven. If he on his travels, where he went into the synagogues and read from the scriptures there, had found falsified scriptures, he had warned clearly and strongly against it. There is no such warning about the old scriptures neither in the Bible, nor in the Quran, nor as far as we have found in the Hadiths. He did not like some of the younger rules introduced by the Pharisees and others, but nothing about the old scriptures. This means that no falsifications can have been made until after his death in 33 AD (and f.x. Ezra - the pet falsifier of many Muslims - is out). Then in come the Qumran scrolls: There were 225 Biblical texts, which with one exception - The Book of Esther - contained the complete or parts of all texts/books in OT, AND WHICH ARE IDENTICAL TO TODAY'S SCRIPTURES, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MINOR DETAILS NORMAL FOR HAND COPIED SCRIPTURES. These Qumran scrolls all are from between 150 BC and 50 BC. The fact that the OT at the time of Jesus were not falsified, combined with the fact that the OT of that time, as proved via the even older Qumran scrolls, are identical to our OT, alone prove 100% that the OT is not falsified.

Like so often with Islam, there have been - and are - claims, but only claims. (If there had been real proofs, the world had been told about it frequently and in big letters.)

007 2/89h: “Allah is the enemy to those who reject Faith”. Whereas Yahweh leaves his flock in a safe place to try to save the lost ones. Quite a difference between the two books. And between the two claimed gods.

###008 2/94a: “If the last Home, with Allah (Yahweh*), be for you (Jews*) specially, and not for anyone else, then seek for ye death, if ye are sincere - - -“. Wrong - and a contradiction of the Bible and its moral code. A Jew (or a Christian) cannot seek death to go to Heaven, because self murder – also indirectly – is a serious sin (destroying the gift from God - your life) = end in Hell. Any god had known – but obviously not Muhammad. Worse: Muslim scholars today know this, but use the argument anyhow in their congregations. Al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie.

009 2/95c: "And Allah is well-acquainted with the wrongdoers" See 2/233h below.

010 2/96: "For Allah sees well what they (non-Muslims, here likely Jews*) do". See 2/85c above and 2/233h and 35/38b below.

011 2/98a: "Whoever is an enemy to Allah and His angels and Messengers (included Muhammad*) - - - lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith". Included being an enemy to those who opposes Muhammad.

012 2/118a: “Say those without knowledge: ‘Why speaketh not Allah unto us? Or why cometh not unto us a Sign?” As said first in this quotation: So say those without knowledge - and who wants to be reckoned to be without knowledge? This is one of the many fast-talks Muhammad had to use to get away from questions and demands for proving what he told - he was unable to prove anything of any consequence concerning his religion, and blind faith was the demand. But who has least knowledge - the ones in blind faith, or the ones knowing that in most aspects of life, the most sure way to be cheated, is to be blind and to be naive?

013 2/139a: “Will ye (Jews and Christians) dispute with us about Allah, seeing that He is our Lord and your Lord - - -”. Islam likes to pretend or state without any proof that Allah and Yahweh/God is the same god. But both the gods and their teachings are very different - as said before especially if you compare the bloody god of war Allah was turned into in and after 622 AD, after Muhammad came to need warriors for highwaymen and later for wars, with the far milder and more benevolent god we meet in NT. The Quran makes a lot of statements, but not one single proof, even though it should be easy for Allah to prove something - at least his own existence. Besides: Read history (drop glorifying propaganda and judge from acts and deeds and demands and introduced rules a, moral, etc.- "do against others like you want others do against you") - Muslim history like ibn Ishaq if you want - and the Hadiths, and also the Quran, and see what kind of a man Muhammad really was! We do not accept the word of a man with that kind of moral and ethical standards, without proofs - there has to be limits to being naïve. Also: Contradiction to the Bible.

014 2/139b: "- - - seeing that He (Allah*) is our (Muslim's*) Lord and your (non-Muslim's*) Lord - - -". At least to Jews and Christians this is impossible to see, as Yahweh and Allah is not the same god. They simply are too different. Also see 29/46ec below.

015 2/139c: “- - - (Allah*) is our (Muslims’*) Lord and your (non-Muslim’s*) Lord - - -“. As this claim only is based on other, not proved claims, and especially as there exists other possibilities than Islam where at least some - f.x. Yahweh - are based on stronger traditions, this is an invalid statement, unless it is proved. After all if the old books tell the truth, the Bible proves a number of things concerning Yahweh, whereas the Quran was unable to prove even a comma. Plus: Severe contradiction to the Bible, as Allah cannot be the same god as Yahweh - fundamentally too different teachings. Also see 29/46ec below.

016 2/140k: "Who is more unjust than those who conceal the testimony they have from Allah". Here is one more reference to Muhammad's claim that the reason for divergences between his teachings and the Bible, was that the Bible was falsified - the only way he had to explain away those differences, which in reality were caused by his believing in the apocryphal (made up) stories, legends, fairy tales. etc. which flourished in and around Arabia. And to repeat it: Science has long since proved that the claim is wrong - there may be mistakes in the Bible, but not falsifications: The some 300 copies or fragments of the Gospels, some 13ooo from the rest of the Bible, and some 32ooo quotes from or references to the Bible in other manuscripts older than 610 AD (when Muhammad started) all are in full accordance with the present Bible - IF NOT ISLAM HAD SCREAMED ABOUT IT. Also none of them have marks modern science can find from being falsified - and modern science is very good at finding falsifications, as it is a common crime today. But maybe there is an answer to the question: If someone twists the religion of a (perhaps) existing god to make a new religion giving the twister power, riches and perhaps women - well, perhaps that hypothetical god would think this was more unjust - - - perhaps showing it by making him sterile, and letting all the children who at least officially were his, die in a young age (even the last one and the only one who survived him - Fatime - only survived him by half a year)? Who knows?

And even as science have proved that the Bible is not falsified, Islam has delivered an even stronger proof for this, by being unable to document even one single clear falsification among all those tens of thousands of relevant manuscripts - if there had existed even one such falsification, Islam had found it and like said above screamed about it. Islam’s deep silence on this point is an even stronger proof than the one from science for that there are no falsifications - mistakes perhaps, but no falsifications. (You meet Muslims and Muslim missionaries and religious lower leaders who claim - but never with proofs, only claims - that proofs for falsifications of the Bible is found (remember here Islam's rules for lawful lies), but never from Islam as such, or from top leaders.)

017 2/144m: "Nor is Allah unmindful of what they (Jews, Christians, Sabeans*) do". If Allah exists. If he is behind the Quran. And if the Quran tells the full and only truth on this point.

018 2/154b: “And say not of those who are slain in the way of Allah: ‘They are dead’. Nay, they are living - - -". One of the many, many never proved claims in the Quran. And as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is from no god, it is highly unlikely it has reliable information about this.

019 2/159b: “Those who conceal the clear (Signs) - - -”. No danger - not one single valid or clear sign/proof for Allah is sent down (unless it is omitted from the Quran). But it is VERY typical for the Quran to talk about “signs” as if they were proved facts - and more or less proofs of Allah. (And at the same time often accept nothing about other gods without demanding proofs).

020 2/159i: "- - - on them (in reality all Jews and Christians, but see 2/146a above*) shall be Allah's curse - - -." Also in the Bible there are a few curses, but not like in the Quran, where one can get the impression that the main arguments for being good and for not being bad except warlike and suppressive toward non-Muslims, are: If you are good you get shade, good food, and many women in Paradise, if you are bad you get Allah's curses and Hell. So there are plenty of curses in the Quran. And there also is little of "turn the other cheek".

021 2/162a: "They (non-Muslims*) will abide therein (in the curse*) - - -". This is of no consequence unless Allah exists and is a god.

022 2/167a: "Nor will there be a way for them (sinners, non-Muslims*) out of the fire." Well, there is a possibility in the beginning, as may be some of the not too bad ones may be called out from the flames. Also in the Quran there are indications for that may be Hell is not quite forever (6/128c, 11/107b, 43/74d, 51/13c, 78/23).

023 2/190f: "- - - Allah loveth not transgressors". Does he then love Muslims with their partly immoral moral code with f.x. wide acceptance of the use of dishonesty, their partly unjust and immoral laws, not to mention their bloody war and looting religion?

024 2/264c: "And Allah guideth not those who reject faith". But if the Quran is not from him - and no god made a book with that many errors - does he then guide Muslims? Simply no - and what then about a possible next life in case?

025 3/63b: "- - - Allah hath full knowledge of those who do mischief". Does this mean Muslims in reality? - there is no doubt that many members of the war religion Islam with its "peculiar" moral code according to all normal moral rules, did and do a lot of mischief. (Compare the Quran's moral code, war code, etc. with "Do against others like you want others do against you", and feel sick.)

026 3/87a: "- - - on them (see 3/86b-c above*) (rests) the curse of Allah - - -". See 3/77b above.

027 3/87b: "- - - on them (see 3/86b-c above*) (rests) the curse of Allah, of His angels, and of all mankind". We cannot tell about the effect on Allah and his claimed angels. But even though this verse primarily talks about people leaving Islam, it may sometimes have weighed heavily for Muslims starting horrors also against other non-Muslims. (Muslims often complain about the crusaders, but holy Heaven how much worse and on how much greater scale they behaved themselves - f.x. in Armenia, Africa, Sind (now approximately Pakistan) and India.)

028 3/87d: "- - - on them (who leave Islam*) (rests) the curse - - - of all mankind - - -". What Muslim can co-exist with such ones? And: No compulsion in religion?

029 3/120d: "- - - Allah compasseth round about all that they (non-Muslims*) do". = Allah sees and knows everything. Also see 2/233h above.

030 3/151a: “Soon shall We (Allah*) cast terror into the heart of the unbelievers - - -.” Of course. One more good pep-talk. And a bit different from "turn the other cheek" in the Bible.

031 3/176d: "- - - Allah's plan is that He will give them (non-Muslims plenty in this life, but*) no portion in the Hereafter - - -". This is Muhammad's standard "explanation" for why Muslims often live a sorry life whereas some non-Muslims live in plenty. There is no proof for the claim - like for everything else of central claims in the Quran.

032 3/177d: "- - - not the least harm will they (the non-believers*) do to Allah - - -". It is not possible to harm him unless he exists.

033 3/178a: "Let not the unbelievers think Our (Allah's*) respite to them is good for themselves: We grant them respite that they may grow in their iniquity: but they will have a shameful punishment." Once more an explanation to non-Muslims and Muslims alike why non-Muslims often have a good life, but Muslims often a bad one. But do not be sad; they will be punished in the claimed next life.

But does punishment for what the god has predestined, indicate a fair, good, and benevolent god? Also see 4/43h and 4/46g below.

034 3/199c: "- - - those (of "the People of the Book"*) who believe in Allah - - -". None of those believe in Allah, but in Yahweh (though some of them sometimes wrongly have used the name Allah for Yahweh). If they believe in Allah, they no longer are of "the People of the Book", but Muslims.

035 4/37b: "- - - We (Allah*) have prepared, for those who resist Faith, a punishment that steeps them in contempt - - -". See 3/77b above.

036 4/42g: "- - - never will they (not good Muslims* and non-Muslims*) hide a single fact for Allah." Such - never proved - claims are good comfort for Muslims; "they" will be punished. They also are good whips for Muhammad and his successors - "behave, or Allah will punish you". And if Islam is a made up religion: It was and is good and cheap words for Muhammad and for his successors.

037 4/51g: "- - - they (Jews, Christians*) are better guided - - - than (Muslims*) - - -". If Yahweh exists like both the Bible and the Quran tells, but Allah not - or if Allah is not a dominant god - this may be correct. Yahweh has proved himself if the old books tell the truth, Allah has proved exactly nothing.

038 4/52a: "They (the People of the Book - Jews, Christians, Sabeans*) are (men) Allah hath cursed - - -". To use small letters: BAD PEOPLE! But is the claim true? - it never was proved, and much is wrong in the Quran.

039 4/81a: "But Allah records their (claimed hypocrites' or non-Muslims’*) nightly (plots) - - -". = Remember: Allah will punish them. - if he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran tells the full and only truth about everything. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

040 4/84g: "It may be that Allah will restrain the fury of the unbelievers". Once more we are back to the fact: Not unless he exists and has the power to do this.

041 4/88d: “For those whom Allah hath thrown out of the way, never shalt thou find the way.” When Allah has decided – and he decides everything – there is no way to have things your own way. Yahweh on the other hand according to NT would NEVER throw anyone out of the way who honestly wanted to be in - and he would go far out of his way to lead those on a wrong track back to the right one. Cfr. f.x. "the lost sheep" (Matt.18/12-14). Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

042 4/104c: "- - - ye (Muslims*) have hope from Allah, while they (non-Muslims*) have none". Wrong. They had hope in their god/gods. But one of these two parts likely were wrong - perhaps both. Contradicted by the Bible. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

043 4/108a: "They (non-Muslims*) may hide (their crimes) from men, but they cannot hide (them) from Allah - - -". Cheer up - Allah will punish them. And also a reminder: Do not try to cheat, because Allah will see you, too. But also remember: This sentence is a claim, not a proved truth.

044 4/108b: "- - - Allah doth compass round (= notice and outdo *) all that they do." A moral infusion: Allah will punish "them". And a whip: Allah will see if I so something Muhammad will not like.

########One of the verses behind the lawful dishonesty in Islam - when Allah could "compass around" people, of course also Muslims could do so, as long as it was not prohibited - which it was not.

045 4/116b: "- - - one who joins gods with Allah - - -". Non-Muslims do not join gods with Allah. They simply do not believe he exists, and believe in their own god(s). An exception may be the old Arabs, who believed in their main pagan god, al-Lah, which Muhammad claimed in reality was the only god Allah - this in case is one of the Arabisms in the Quran.

046 4/123d: "Nor will he (non-Muslim*) find, besides Allah, any protector or helper". Perhaps not besides Allah - especially if Allah does not exist, not to mention if he is from the dark forces - but perhaps instead of Allah - - - if f.x. Yahweh exists?

047 4/125a: "Who can do better in religion than one who submits his whole self to Allah - - -". Anybody if Allah does not exist - and there are at least 3 very good indications for that he is fiction: 1) Muhammad was never able to prove anything. 2) Allah has never in 1400 years given the slightest clear indication for his existence. 3) And the Quran is not from a god - no god would ever be connected to a book of that quality.

Not to mention if he exists, but is from the dark forces.

048 4/125g: "For Allah did take Abraham for a friend". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere - and according to the Bible it was Yahweh who was Abraham's friend - - - if Abraham ever existed.

049 4/131f: “- - - We (Allah*) have directed the People of the Book before you (Muslims*) - - - to fear Allah.” Wrong - the "People of the Book" were directed to fear Yahweh. A fact from written history.

*050 4/136j: “Any who denieth Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Day of Judgment, hath gone far, far astray”. Hardly. When you know how full of mistakes, contradictions and wrong logic the book on which all Islam rests on is, it takes some more proof to decide that it is the non-Muslims who are “far, far astray”. As everything in Islam rests on the Quran with all its errors and on the if possible even less reliable Hadiths, the chances are that Muslims are the ones who are most astray. This even more so as all the mistakes, etc. prove that no god was involved in the Quran, and that nothing - absolutely nothing - ever was proved about the existence of Allah or about Muhammad's connection to a god. In all other aspects of life blind belief is the easiest way to be cheated - and it is normal for false prophets (there have been many through the times) to rely on fast talk, bluffs, etc., and demands for blind belief.

051 4/140e: "For Allah will collect the Hypocrites and all those who defy Faith - in Hell". As far as the ones who believe in the Bible go, this is contradicted by the Bible. The same goes for the ones who believe in the Quran - the ones living according to the harsh parts of the Quran's partly immoral moral code, etc. hardly will have a chance to be accepted by a god behind something like NT (if that god exists, the chances for which at least exists). But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

###052 4/144c: “Take not for friends unbelievers rather than believers: do ye wish to offer Allah an open proof against yourselves?” This is really a strong one: To make good friends with non-Muslims is a clear proof that you are not a good Muslim - this even for Allah, not to mention for all the Muslim society. This verse may give a strong social pressure NOT to associate with non-Muslims.

#053 4/162g: "- - - those (Jews*) who establish regular prayer and practice regular charity and believe in Allah and the Last Day: to them shall We (the god*) soon give a great reward". Also Jews may come to Paradise - - - if not this verse from 626 AD is abrogated (made invalid) by later verses. Though you will meet Muslims saying this is about believing Jews from before they learnt about the Quran (Allah often does not punish sins the sinner did not know were sins), even if it is written in present tense.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are taught that a question or problem which really can have only one valid solutions, can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. F.x. in cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. Islam teaches differently. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1): Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. Islam is teaching differently. 2): The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other. Islam is teaching differently.)

Another fact: Today it is easy by means of statistical methods to check if prayers have any effect. (Let f.x. 1ooo persons each pray for one among 1ooo unknown persons sick or in other ways in need. compare the result after some time with a similar group of 1ooo who has not been prayed for, and see if there is a difference. If there is a positive difference, this would be a strong indication or perhaps even a proof for something - a proof Islam strongly and dearly needs, as they have not any proof for even a single of its central claims. But it has not even tried to make such a test. Why?)

054 4/168-169: "- - - Allah will not - - - guide them (non-Muslims*) to any way - Except the way to Hell - - -". Compare this to f.x. "the lost coin" (Luke 15/8-10), "the lost sheep", "the lost son" (Luke 15/11-31), or "the 11. hour" (Matt. 20/8/13) in NT. Definitely not the same god.

055 4/172e: "- - - He (Allah*) will gather them (non-Muslims*) all together unto Himself to (answer (and to punishment*))". See 3/77b above.

056 5/12a: “Allah did aforetime take a covenant from the Children of Israel - - -.” Wrong. See 4/159a. The covenant was with Yahweh, not with Allah. (As the two teachings basically are very different, the two gods cannot have been just two names for the same god like the Quran claims - they were two different (if one or both existed) if the god was not a mentally ill one.)

##057 5/12e: "I (Allah*) am with you (the Jews*): if ye (but) establish regular Prayers - - -". There is no demand, request or even mentioning of a fixed number of prayers of fixed times for prayers in the Bible. As this is so essential to Allah that it is one of the pillars of Islam, but of no interest at all for Yahweh - pray when there is a reason or when you feel for it - the 5 fixed prayers of the Quran is one of the many absolute proofs for that Yahweh and Allah is not the same god.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are taught that a question or problem which really can have only one valid solutions, can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. F.x. in cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. Islam teaches differently. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1): Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. Islam is teaching differently. 2): The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other. Islam is teaching differently.)

Another fact: Today it is easy by means of statistical methods to check if prayers have any effect. (Let f.x. 1ooo persons each pray for one among 1ooo unknown persons sick or in other ways in need. compare the result after some time with a similar group of 1ooo who has not been prayed for, and see if there is a difference. If there is a positive difference, this would be a strong indication or perhaps even a proof for something - a proof Islam strongly and dearly needs, as they have not any proof for even a single of its central claims. But it has not even tried to make such a test. Why?)

058 5/12g: “- - - and loan to Allah a beautiful loan - - -.” This normally is “Quran-speak” for “risk or lose your life in battle for Muhammad and Allah”. In just this case it is claimed to be said to the Jews of old times, which gave it double value: A good pep-talk and “documenting” that messengers wanting war, was nothing new.

###059 5/13a: "- - - We (the god*) cursed them - - -". Some Muslims claim this means the god lifted the covenant with the Jews. But this is not what is said - it is easily possible to become angry with someone without retracting serious agreements because of that. There is no indication for that Allah here - or any other place in the Quran or the Bible - terminated the covenant. On the contrary it is very clear that in spite of disagreements, the covenant lived on - the Bible even reports it was renewed several times. This covenant is till this day the reason why the Jews believe they are Yahweh's special people - not that they are the descendants from Abraham, like Muhammad liked to claim. Because the covenant nowhere is reported terminated, it at least formally still is valid - if the books tell the truth. Besides; the essential point here is what Yahweh said and did - and he is not reported terminating the covenance - not even in the Quran. (Also remember: In spite of the Quran's strong claims, Yahweh and Allah is not the same god. And not less: As the Quran and all its mistakes are not from any god, it may not be true that Allah - if he at all exists - cursed them. Not to mention: As Muhammad believed in the use of dishonesty as a working tool, this even may have been a made up propaganda claim.)

As for the claim that the god here terminated the covenant with the Jews: Remember that the Quran several places stresses that its language is clear and easy - to be understood literally if nothing else is clearly indicated. The clear and easy texts here says "cursed", not "terminated the covenant". And it is likely an omniscient god is able to express exactly what he means.

*060 5/15h: “- - - there hath come to you (Jews, Christians*) from Allah a (new) light (Muhammad*) - - -“. Well, that is one of the questions: Did a man so morally degenerated and preaching a religion based on a book with so many mistakes, etc. and so much wrong logic, really represent a god? And did a war religion with a partly immoral moral code represent a benevolent god? Simply no to each of the questions.

*061 5/18a: “(Both) the Jews and the Christians say: ‘We are sons of Allah, and (we are*) His beloved’”. Neither Jews nor Christians say they are real sons - or daughters - of Yahweh (not of Allah) (though they often figuratively - but only figuratively - refer to Yahweh as the “Father in Heaven” or humans as "Children of God".)

##062 5/18d: “Why then doth He (the god*) punish you for your sins (if he loves you*)”. Wrong psychology, and a naïve question, as anyone knows you sometimes have to punish even children you love, to teach them how to behave.

063 5/23f: “- - - but on Allah put your (Jews*) trust if you have faith”. It is highly unlikely Jews at the time of Moses told their fellow Jews to trust Allah, as the name of the god of the Jews was Yahweh (and besides the name Allah was introduced only some 2000 years later (as a substitute for al-Lah). Actually Muhammad often uses the name Allah where it should have been Yahweh. The switching of names is so obvious, that mostly we do not comment on it.) Contradicted by the Bible. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

064 5/28c: "- - - I (Cain*) do fear Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says his god was Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

######065 5/35g: “- - - strive with might and main (see 5/35a-b*) in His (Allah’s*) cause - - -”. For us this is one of the most detestable points in the entire Quran and Islam: Fight and steal and rob and mutilate and rape and enslave and hate and murder and get rich and suppress in the name of your god, and as a service to your god - a claimed good and benevolent god!

The same god as Yahweh? Jesus and Muhammad in the same religion? Don't ask silly questions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

066 5/41k: "(For non-Muslims or hypocrites*) it is not Allah's will to purify their hearts". Compare with f.x. "the lost sheep" (Matt. 18/12-14). One more strong indication, not to say proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

067 5/44e: "- - - to them (the learned Jews*) was entrusted the protection of Allah's Book - - -". The often repeated claim: The Jews got a book similar to the Quran from Allah, but falsified it so that it became OT. (And the Christians falsified Jesus' teaching of the Quran into NT. Believe one or both these claims if you are able to.) Strongly proved wrong by both science and Islam by being unable to find even one proved falsification.

068 5/49e: "- - - it is Allah's purpose to punish them (non-Muslims*)". See 3/77b above

069 5/50c: "But who - - - can give better judgment than Allah?". Judging from some unjust sharia laws and some immoral parts of the Islamic moral code: Quite a number of judges.

070 5/60a: “Those who incurred the curse of Allah and his wrath, those of some he transformed into apes and swine - - -”. Hardly likely. This needs strong proofs. (This story Muhammad took from an old legend.)

071 5/61c: "But Allah knoweth fully what they hide". Se 2/233h above and 35/38b below.

072 5/64i: "Every time they (here mainly the Jews*) kindle the fire of war - - -". Irony to say the least of it - and a lot of gall - as practically all raids, wars, and armed skirmishes during Muhammad's stay in Medina (82 in all?) were initiated by and aggression from Muhammad and his followers.

073 5/64j: "And Allah loveth not those who do mischief". Whom Allah dislikes naturally is for "us" to detest. On the other hand: Muslims did and do a lot of mischief according to all normal moral rules - what about their relationship to a possible god? - this question is even more urgent if Allah is a made up god and if there exists another, benevolent god somewhere, not liking lies (al-Taqiyya, etc.), stealing, rape, mistreatment of innocents, torture or murder.

074 5/67f: “For Allah guideth not those (“infidels”) who reject Faith (Islam*).” No, only good Muslims are worth guiding.

075 5/68f: "- - - their ("the People of the Book") obstinate rebellion and blasphemy". Very bad people. Stay away from them - or fight them. Characteristics like this leads up to dislike and worse - - - and the possibility for raids against them and suppression or even enslavement or killing, like we see in Islamic history.

076 5/71b: "_ - - Allah (in mercy) turned to them (the Jews*) - - -". According to the Bible, their god was Yahweh, not Allah.

077 5/71c: "But Allah sees well all that they do". See 2/233h above and 35/38b below.

078 5/72a: “They (Christians*) do blaspheme who say: ‘God is Christ the son of Mary.’ - - - and the Fire will be their abode.” This clearly contradicts – and abrogates:

  1. 2/62: “- - - those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabeans any who believe in Allah (Yahweh = Allah according to the Quran*) and the Last Day, and work in righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord - - -.”
  2. 5/69: “Those who (believe in the Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabeans – any who believe in Allah (here included Yahweh/God*) and the Last day, and work righteousness – on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.”

(2 abrogations)

(2 contradictions)

079 5/72m: "For the wrongdoers there will be no one to help". For those of what Muhammad called "wrongdoers" who were Jews or Christians there perhaps is Yahweh.

080 5/74a: "Why turn they (Christians*) not to Allah - - -?" For the very simple reasons:

  1. They believed - and believe - in another religion and another god, and saw/see that Islam was/is so far away from that religion, that it could not be the same one.
  2. They saw that the teachings were so very different, that it impossibly could be the same god, preferred their own Yahweh, and believed Allah was something made up.
  3. They saw that Muhammad was teaching a very different religion - he impossible could be a prophet from Yahweh.
  4. They saw that f.x. according to 5.Mos. 18/21 he could be no prophet at all - he did not even make wrong prophesies, he made no real prophesies at all. He consequently - and also because his teachings were wrong - was a false prophet. (Even Muhammad himself said he was unable to see the future.)
  5. Muslims like to claim the reason why Jews and Christians did not accept Muhammad, was that Muhammad was no Jew, but that only is a smokescreen to hide and explain away the real reason: Allah could and cannot be the same god as Yahweh - too much and too fundamental parts of the teachings are too deeply different; Muhammad did not represent Yahweh.

081 5/76a. "Will ye (Christians*) worship, besides Allah (Jesus*) - - -". No Christian worships something besides Allah. They do not believe in Allah at all, and worship another god, Yahweh, INSTEAD OF Allah. There is a huge difference between these two concepts. (Oh, we know the Quran claims - and as normal for the Quran without proofs - that Yahweh and Allah are the same god, but their teachings are far too different for that to be true.)

082 5/76b. "Will ye (Christians*) worship, besides Allah, something which hath no power either to harm or benefit you?" The word "something" here must refer to Mary and Jesus in the previous verse. When it comes to Mary and the Catholics, Muhammad here may have a point - saints are not an idea you find in the Bible. (On the other hand Catholics do not pray to a divine Mary, only to what they believe may be a helper to reach the divine.) As for Jesus we are back to the fact that he several places told he could help - - - and to the old fact that science and Islam both clearly has showed that the Bible is not falsified, even though Islam is dependent on this never documented claim for their religion to survive. (If the Bible is not falsified, it is ever so clear that then the Quran is a made up - falsified - book, because so much of what it claims the Bible tells or should tell, is not from the Bible, and thus that things are seriously wrong in the Quran.)

083 5/81a: “If only they had believed in Allah, in (Muhammad*) - - - never would they (Jews and Christians*) have taken them (non-Muslims or Pagans*) for friends - - -”. It is just tragic - most religions are today able to live together in peace and reasonable harmony. But Islam is so bent on distaste and superiority complex against all non-Muslims, and on the idea of conquering all other religions and suppressing its peoples, that integration is difficult. The only position Islam really can accept, is superiority.

084 5/81c: "- - - believed in Allah, in the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -".A variant of Muhammad's main mantra to glue himself to his god and his platform of power.

085 5/83a: "And when they (Christians*) listen to the revelations received by the Messenger (Muhammad*), thou (Muslims*) wilt see their eyes overflowing with tears - - -". Pure propaganda which was possible for Muhammad to use, as there were few Christians in the area, so that Muhammad's followers could not see it was untrue. Today it is easy for all and every Muslim to see that Christians are not moved by the contents of the Quran, and especially not the ones who really has studied that book.

This surah is from 632 AD, and by then Muhammad knew very well that Christians just did not storm to embrace his new religion - he knew he was lying when he said this.

086 6/11b: “- - - see what was the end of those who rejected the Truth”. The truth is not more reliable here than in f.x. 6/5 and 6/11. Also see 6/6 and 13/1g.

087 6/14e: "- - - those who joins gods with Allah". = Non-Muslims. And also one of Muhammad's many negative names for them.

088 6/20a: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (here the Bible*) - - -". = Jews, Christians, Sabeans. Besides according to the Bible the Bible is backed by Yahweh, not by Allah.

089 6/20b: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book know this (that the Quran was revealed to Muhammad, etc*) as they know their own sons”. Very wrong – they had lots of reasons to suspect that something was wrong – very wrong – with both Muhammad and with his religion. F.x. too many points that differed from the Bible/Torah (which Muhammad claimed were from the same religion) and too many other mistakes. Islam will have to prove this claim to be believed.

090 6/22e: "- - - the partners (to Us (Allah*)) whom ye (non-Muslims*) (invented and) talked about - - -". The big question here is, however: Is also Allah an invented god? As the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god, that is highly likely. Personally we do not even believe Allah is even from the dark forces - the errors in the Quran are too many and too grave.

091 6/26: "- - - they (disbelievers*) only destroy their own souls (by not believing in Allah*) - - -". This only is true if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about everything. If f.x. Allah is a made up god, and the disbelievers also believe in other gods which do not exist, it does not matter if also Allah exists or not, or is not the god described in the Quran. And if they on the other hand happen to believe in a god who exists, the Quran's claim here is very wrong.

092 6/31a: "Lost indeed are they who treat it as a falsehood that they (humans*) must meet Allah - - -". They are lost only if the Quran is from a god, if that god is Allah, and if in addition the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

093 6/39a: "Those who rejects Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

094 6/39b: "Those who rejects Our (Allah's*) Signs are deaf and dumb - - -". The fact that there does not exist one single valid sign which proves Allah, may instead indicate that someone has tried a little cheating and then has been looked through by people with knowledge and/or intelligence - here the opposite of deaf and dumb. But we may remind you that to believe blindly often has the same effect as being deaf and dumb.

##095 6/41a: “Nay - On Him (Allah*) would ye (people*) call (if you were in distress*) - - -", Definitely not for non-Muslims, as most likely he is a made up god - the Quran proves that the chances for that he exists are practically nil - and if he exists, the question is if he is a god (not f.x. a dressed up Iblis/the Devil or something - the moral code, etc. in the Quran does not make such an explanation impossible).

####096 6/45b: "Of the wrongdoers (non-Muslims*) the last remnant was cut off (killed*). Praise be to Allah - - -". This "Praise be to Allah" is one of the points which makes Islam a morally sick and distasteful religion. A claimed benevolent and good god who is to be praised for stealing, rape, repeated atrocities, apartheid, and mass murder, and for the reason they had another religion only, is distasteful outside our vocabulary, and as wrong morally. We are sorry - we have big vocabularies from lives in reading and learning, but we do not have strong enough words for this.

097 6/47a: "Think ye (people*), if the punishment of Allah comes to you - - - will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?" The tsunami of 26. Dec. 2004 hit Muslims much harder than all other religions put together. The numbers are unsure, but some 250ooo+ vs. some 50ooo. Were all those 250ooo+ Muslims bad people?

098 6/47b: "Think ye (people*), if the punishment of Allah comes to you - - - will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?" Remember this in the cases in the Quran where Muhammad explains that the reason why Allah did not punish non-Muslims, was that he would not risk hurting Muslims at the same time (an "explanation" which in case shows that Allah is not omnipotent).

099 6/64c: "- - - yet ye (non-Muslims*) worship false gods!" As far as Jews and Christians go, this is contradicted in the Bible - a book which on top of all neither mentions Allah nor Muhammad nor many of the most essential parts of Islam - like the duty to pray 5 times a day, the duty to go on pilgrimage to Mecca, the duty to wage war for the religion, etc. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs. Because as long as it is clear the Quran is not from any god, it may be Allah who is a false god.

100 6/70e: "- - - there is no protector or intercessor except Allah - - -". Contradictions:

  1. The Quran tells that some ones can be intercessors if Allah permits it.
  2. It also is made clear that Muhammad has got the right to be intercessor even on the Last Day.
  3. And then there is the question about f.x. Yahweh.

101 6/70i: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) persisted in rejecting Allah". Not strange as they saw things in Muhammad's teaching were much wrong - his sources often said other things than he claimed they said, and this especially goes for the Bible. The reason here is likely to be that Muhammad knew legends, etc. about and/or based on the Bible, but not the Bible itself - at least only very superficially. (It is clear that Muhammad had little or no knowledge directly from the Bible until after he fled to Medina in 622 AD (this surah is from 621 AD). In Medina there were many Jews, and it is quite likely he may have got some contact at least with the real OT, but by then it was too late - Muhammad had to stick to his stories and claim the Bible falsified, or admit that he was wrong and loose his platform of power.)

102 6/80c: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said: (Come) ye (his people*) to dispute with me, about Allah, when He (himself) hath guided me?" Contradicted by the Bible which says his god was Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words, like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

103 6/80d: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said: (Come) ye (his people*) to dispute with me, about Allah, when He (himself) hath guided me?" Even omitting the fact that the Bible never mentions Allah (or Muhammad), this is not from the Bible.

104 6/81d: "Which of (us) two parties (Arab/Muslims vs. non-Muslims*) hath more right - - -". That is more of a question than most Muslims like to believe.

105 6/94b: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) have left behind you all (the favors) which We (Allah*) bestowed on you - - -" - because you did not believe and obey Allah and Muhammad - in this world Muhammad. As for Jews and Christians at least this is strongly contradicted by the Bible. Not to mention that it may be contradicted by reality as the Quran is not from a god - too much is wrong in the book for any god to be involved. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

106 6/100c: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) - - - attribute to Him sons and daughters." In the old pagan religion al-Lah/Allah (the name means "the god" - not "God" but "the god" - Muhammad changed the name slightly to only Allah) was the main god and often said to be the moon god. Many Arabs thought other gods (and the angels) were his children, with three of his daughters, al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat, as the three main ones - the 3 Muhammad accepted in the famous "Satanic Verses" (but later changed his mind).

107 6/106f: "- - - turn aside from those who join gods with Allah". Do not mingle with non-Muslims.

108 6/107c: “- - - but We (Allah*) made thee (Muhammad*) not one to watch over their (“infidels’) doing - - -.” This verse is abrogated – made invalid - by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

####109 6/108d: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”.

Comment A6/92 (A6/93 in the 2008 English edition): “Lit., ‘thus godly have we made….', etc. implying that it is in the nature of man to regard the belief which have been implanted in him from babyhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones – with the result that a polemic against those beliefs often tends to provoke a hostile psychological reaction.” This is said as an explanation why Islam sometimes meets a negative reaction. But the book skips the fact that this also goes for Muslims: If they are strongly indoctrinated, they may react strongly to arguments and facts they do not like – and without thinking over, or being mentally unable to think over – even true facts. This is likely to be the explanation for why most Muslims are able to be blind to all the mistakes and proofs for that things are very wrong in the Quran and thus with Muhammad and in Islam.

#########110 6/108e: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”. This sentence should be extremely thought-provoking also to Muslims.

111 6/110a: "We (Allah*)(too) shall turn to (confusion) their hearts and their ("unbelievers'*) eyes - - -". Jesus and Yahweh were searching for "the lost lambs". Muhammad and Allah make their way back to belief difficult or impossible. The same god? No.

112 6/110b: "We (Allah*) shall leave them ("unbelievers") in their trespasses - - -." See 6/110a just above.

###113 6/111a: “Even if We (Allah*) did send unto them (non-Muslims*) angels, and the dead did speak unto them, and We gathered together all things before their very eyes, they are not the ones to believe, unless it is Allah’s plan”. This may be understood in two ways – both quite fast talk:

  1. Another and strengthen variety of no. 7/120a and others - with Muhammad lying in the Quran.
  2. Some of Muhammad’s audience questioned the obviously wrong logic and psychology in that clear proofs would not impress anybody, and needed a reason why not – and got the all-encompassing and ultimate answer to all difficult or unanswerable questions: It is Allah’s will - sometimes the fastest of all fast-talk.

This is one of the places in the Quran where Muhammad knew he was lying - produce some real miracles, and at least some will believe, and this even more so in old times with naive, uneducated, superstitious people, not as skeptical towards such things as people nowadays - it was easier to make people believe.

114 6/111b: “- - - they (non-Muslims*) are not the ones to believe, unless it is Allah’s Plan”. This is even worse than 6/107a above - Allah simply has made it impossible for non-Muslims to become Muslims, if it does not fit him. But still he condemns them to Hell!!! Predestination at its worst - perhaps except when luring people to their death or mutilation in battle.

No comment could possibly explain our point of view or distaste.

115 6/114e: "They (non-Muslims*) know full well, to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (the Quran*) - - -". Wrong - and a correction: What some of them knew full well, was that the Quran was not from the same god as the Bible - too many fundamental points were too different.

116 6/115g: "- - - He (Allah*) is the One Who heareth and knoweth all". See 2/233h above.

117 6/117a: "Thy (Muslims'/Muhammad's*) Lord (Allah*) knoweth best who strays from His Way - - -". See 2/233h above.

118 6/122b: "Can he who was dead, to whom We (Allah*) gave life - - - be like him who is in the depth of darkness - - -?" Alternative explanation: Can a man who has become a Muslim be compared to something as lowly as a non-Muslim? Of course not. (But what if the Quran is a made up book? - it at least is from no god with all those mistaken facts, etc.)

119 6/138d: "- - - soon will He (Allah*) requite them (non-Muslims*) for their inventions". See 3/77b above.

120 6/139d: "- - - He (Allah*) will soon punish them (non-Muslims*) - - -". See 3/77b above.

121 6/144c: "For Allah guideth not people who do wrong". He guides absolutely no-one if he does not exists - a strong probability as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is not from a god.

122 6/147a: "If they accuse thee (Muhammad*) of falsehood, say: 'Your Lord (Allah*) is full of Mercy all-embracing; but from people in guilt never will His wrath be turned back.'" Muhammad never was able to prove even a comma about Allah or about his own connection to a god - even though it should have been easy for an omnipotent god to do so. He had to resort to fast words and explaining everything away. Here he uses a treats for waylaying the debate.

123 6/150b: "- - - such (persons*) as treat our (Allah's*) Signs as falsehood - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

124 6/159b: "He (Allah*) will in the end tell them (the not good Muslims and others*) the truth of all that they did". But if Allah knows the truth about everything, why then does he have to test people, f.x. by sending them to war for Muhammad and later leaders? Also see 2/233h above.

125 6/161j: "- - - he (Abraham*) (certainly) joined not gods with Allah". Very naturally if the Bible is correct when it tells that Abraham believed in Yahweh and was not involved with Allah at all.

126 7/18: "- - - Hell will I (Allah*) fill with you all". A god who fills a hell with predestined victims, is he a good and benevolent god?

127 7/27b: "- - - We (Allah*) made the Satan friends (only) to those without Faith". Parts of the Quran's moral code and also parts of sharia, not to mention its rules for raids and war, may indicate another truth and make one wonder who are really the friends of Satan.

128 7/28c: "- - - do ye (non-Muslims*) say of Allah what ye know not?" But is the Quran saying about Allah what it knows not, like all the mistakes, etc. indicate? - and may this in case be because there is no god behind the Quran, like all the mistakes, etc. prove?

129 7/36a: "- - - those who reject Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative - at least to Muslims - names for non-Muslims.

130 7/36c: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are Companions of the Fire - - -". See 3/77b

131 7/40a: "- - - those who reject Our (Allah's*) Signs and treat them with arrogance - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

132 7/50e: "- - - those who rejected Him (Allah*) - - -". One of Muhammad's negative names for non-Muslims.

133 7/55b: "- - - Allah loveth not those who trespass beyond bounds". See 7/56a just below.

##134 7/65a: "To the 'Ad people, (we (Allah*) sent) Hud - - -". The stories about Ad and Hud you find different places in the Quran are not from the Bible. As far as we have been able to find out, they are from no written sources.

135 7/65e: (Hud said:) "You (the Ad tribe*) have no other god but Him (Allah*)." As mentioned; according to Muhammad Allah throughout all times have been the one and main god to all people. He only has been overwhelmed and his teachings falsified by humans believing in pagan gods. Also see 6/106b above.

########It is a strange claim that an omnipotent, predestined god is not stronger than claimed made up gods - they outcompeted him all over the world.

136 7/69d: "- - - He (Allah*) made you (the 'Ad tribe) inheritors after the people of Noah - - -". Noah is supposed to have lived in what is now south Iraq, the 'Ad tribe in Arabia. The Quran several places mention that the Arabs had inherited land, houses, etc. from people Allah had exterminated. But 'Ad at least inherited little of such things from the people of Noah - wrong geography.

137 7/72b: "- - - We (Allah*) cut off the roots of the (non-Muslims*) - - -". See 3/77b above.

138 7/73d: "To the Thamud people (we (Allah*) sent) Salih - - -." Salih is another claimed and self-proclaimed Arab prophet - may be and may be not from Arab folklore (if not, the original source is Muhammad). According to Islam he came some time later than Hud. Also he - like Hud - is a contradiction to the claim in the Quran that the Arabs had had no (self proclaimed) prophet before Muhammad.

139 7/85e: "- - - ye (the Madianites*) have no other god but Him (Allah*)". See 6/106b above.

140 7/99d: "- - - those (doomed) to ruin!" But Allah only can doom somebody if he exists and in addition is a god - - - and in addition his predestined Plan cannot be changed.

141 7/101e: "Thus doth Allah seal up the hearts of those who reject Faith (Islam*)". One more 100% proof for that Yahweh and Allah is not the same god. Read f.x. Luke 15/8-10 and 15/11-31 plus Matt. 18/12-14 and 20/8-13 and get a good laugh - or weep - over the claim that Allah = Yahweh.

142 7/102a: “Most of them (people*) We (Allah*) found not men (true) to their covenant - - -“. “The Message of the Quran” (A7/81 - A7/83 in 2008 English edition) tells (in the Swedish edition) that the exact word-for-word translation is: “We found by them nothing that tied them to what is truth and right”. And that book continues by telling that this may include #####man’s capability to instinctively(!!!*) to see the difference between right and wrong.

Now the fact that some of the most fundamental moral questions get the same answer in many societies indicates that something deep inside man tells some common moral truths (though to call it this a "capability to instinctively to see what is truth and right" is deeply wrong - this and similar claims from Islam solely is dictated from the deep lack of proofs for anything at all of the central points in the religion): You shall not steal, you shall not be a nuisance – or worse – to others, you shall not rape, you shall not kill, etc. But it also is possible that these rules simply are a result of the experience that life is better and safer when one treat each others reasonably fair and ok. And Islam and the Quran is the best proof for that these inner messages in case are easy to override for a charismatic leader and for a society, and make immoral behavior praiseworthy and a moral code: To steal/rob, rape, enslave, murder, and more – it all is “good and lawful” if you just observe the right formalities in Islam. To what claimed covenant are they true?

The obvious conclusion: There may be a tendency in a child to know that there are rules in life. But what these rules are, have to be learnt, and what they learn, may as well be morally wrong as morally right - which Islam is a strong proof for. The claim that man has the capability to instinctively see the difference between right and wrong, is a wrong claim - which also Islam is a strong proof for. The claim also is not even tried to be proved.

Besides: Is there really a clear covenant between Allah and the Muslims, or have Muhammad and his followers just made promises and believe it is a covenant? - and if there is a covenant: What is it worth if Allah is a made up god?"

143 7/105c: "- - - your (the Pharaoh's*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". Science says that if the exodus ever happened, it took place around 1235 BC. That means under the mighty and well known Pharaoh Ramses II (Islam wants it to have happened earlier under pharaohs whose reason for death is not known - Ramses II did not drown (guess if 3 religions had vocalized about it if this had been the case!)). What is very sure, is that Allah was no known god to Ramses II, except perhaps as one of many gods - and under an older name, perhaps al-Ilah, the moon god of Arabia (it is no co-incidence that the crescent moon is the symbol of Allah and of Islam) or Il - in a distant country. And what is as sure, is that he was a polytheist.

144 7/130a: “We (indicated Allah*) punished the people of the Pharaoh with years (of draught) - - -.” There is nowhere said directly how long time it took Moses to get his people free and out of Egypt neither in the Quran nor in the Bible. But the few sources indicate a limited time. The Bible has one piece of information that gives a clear indication – and we had better once more mention that science has proved beyond any legal and reasonable and any unreasonable doubt that the Bible never was falsified, in spite of never documented lose claims and lose statement from the Quran and from Islam. Moses was 80 years old when he came to the Pharaoh to get the freedom for the Jews. Afterwards he and his people spent 40 years in Sinai, and he died 120 years old – which means it must have taken less than one year, perhaps weeks or a few months, because if not the numbers do not add up. Also the texts in the Bible indicate weeks or months, even though it is not directly said. Further there is no mentioning of draught or shortness of food or anything else in the Bible connected to this incident. This verse may be a mix up with Joseph and the 7 bad years 430-440 years earlier.

145 7/136b: "- - - We (indicated Allah*) drowned them (Ramses II and his people*) in the sea - - -". Wrong as far as Ramses II goes - we know from history that he did not drown.

146 7/152c: "- - - thus do We (Allah*) recompense those who invent (falsehood (= claims not in accordance with Muhammad's teachings*))". What is the value and consequence of this sentence if the Quran is a made up book (with a made up god)?

147 7/180b: "- - - they (bad persons*) will soon be requited". Once more: If Allah exists and is a god, and if the Quran tells the truth and only the truth - and if he can "requite" without changing his predestined and unchangeable Plan.

148 7/182-183b: "Those who reject Our (Allah's*) Signs - - - Respite will I grant unto them - - -". This also is the standard explanation in the Quran for why non-Muslims often have a better life than Muslims; it is Allah who in his wisdom has decided it like this - given them respite. But sooth yourself; they will be punished and you better off than them in the claimed next life at least.

149 7/186b: "To such (persons*) Allah rejects from His guidance - - -". For comparison: Yahweh/Jesus rejects no-one who is honestly searching - not even heavy sinners in the 11. hour (f.x. Luke. 15/8-10 and 15/11-31, Matt 12-14 and 20/8-13). They have to reject themselves.

150 8/13e: (A16): “This because they contended against Allah and his Messenger - - -.” But the Arab word “shaqqahu” in reality means “he separated (or cut) himself off from him”. Is the correct meaning: “This, because they have cut themselves off from Allah and his Apostle - - -“? The meanings vary and the texts in the Quran is as unclear here as so many other places.

151 8/23a: "If Allah had found in them any good, He would indeed have made them (non-Muslims*) listen - - -". Take it easy - there is nothing wrong with "our" belief. The reason why they do not believe in "our" claimed truth, is that they are so bad that Allah do not want them. Muslims use the same logic today: If anyone does not believe in Islam, it is because they do not know what they are talking about, or because they are bad, or because they are Islam-haters, or things like that - easy ways to flee from the fact that many who rejects Islam are intelligent people with much knowledge, and perhaps there is real a reason why they reject it.

152 8/53a: "- - - until they (a people*) change what is in their (own) souls - - -". This is not possible for them if Allah predestines everything like the Quran tells many places. Then only Allah can change it. Full predestination + free will - even partly free will - is an impossibility even for an omnipotent god. As said before, in the realm of the immaterial world there are things impossible even for gods.

153 8/55a: "For the worst beasts in the sight of Allah are those who reject Him - - -". Quite likely - - - if the Quran is not a made up book and Allah a fiction. At least that book is not from a god - too much is wrong.

###154 8/67a: “It is not fitting for a Prophet (Muhammad*) that he should have prisoners of war until he hath thoroughly subdued the land”. One of the moral and ethical real pinnacles in Islam. It takes an effort - and resources - to take care of prisoners. This Muhammad did not like - and voila! - Allah ordered him to kill all prisoners (of course with the exception of the ones one wanted for slaves or wanted to keep for extorting money for from their families - or women and girls for "personal use").

No doubt at all: A morally and ethically superior god and religion, and with lots of empathy - not to forget the perfect and good and kind and good-hearted Muhammad who was free from sins. (Actually there never were philosophers thinking on morality and ethics in Islam like f.x. in the old Greece or later in the West. Muhammad just picked from the contemporary traditions - in some cases he picked good ideas, in other cases he chose rather inhuman ones, and that was it, as it never later has been permitted to think about whether his rules are good - or the best - or not.)

Does anybody wonder why Muslim warriors and terrorists sometimes murder prisoners - guilty or not?

155 9/2e: "- - - Allah will cover with shame those who reject Him". Not unless he exists. Not to mention if he does not exist, but f.x. Yahweh does.

156 9/9b: "The Signs of Allah they (non-Muslims*) have sold for a miserable price - - -". The Quran often insinuates that the ones not accepting Islam, does so because they prefer good time in this world - "a miserable price" - and not because they honestly believe the Quran and Islam are wrong and a false religion. For leaders of sects to use such claims is good psychology for two reasons:

  1. It indicates that "we" are better than the "others".
  2. It adverts thoughts like "if 'they' really believe here is something wrong, maybe there is a reason for that, and maybe we should see into it'. Leaders of fringe sects - like Islam was in its early years - normally do not want facts from the outside.

Also see 3/77a above.

157 9/12f: "- - - for their (non-Muslims*) oaths are nothing to them - - -". Strange words from a man who practiced himself and impressed on his followers that it is better to break an oath if that gave a better result, and who lived by his slogan "war is betrayal" or "war is deceit". (F.x. 2/225a and 5/89a+b above, and 16/91e and 66/2a below, + al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth, Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing), etc.)

158 9/14b: "Fight them (the Unbelievers*) - - -". Compare this to "- - - turn the other cheek - - -" (f.x. Matt.5/38-42). Jesus and Muhammad in the same line of prophets? - stop joking.

159 9/16i: "- - - take none for friends or protectors except Allah, His Messenger (Muhammad*) and the (community of) Believers (Muslims*) - - -". Strongly contradicted by Yahweh and by Jesus in the Bible.

160 9/17a: “It is not for such as join gods with Allah (f.x. God/Yahweh*) - - -. - - - in Fire shall they dwell”. No hope for Christians with their Jesus – in spite of 2/62. (Non-Muslims do not join gods with Allah, but have (one) god(s) instead of Allah.)

161 9/19k: "- - - Allah guides not those who do wrong". Allah can guide nobody if he does not exist - and even if he could guide; where do you end up if you follow a guidebook of a quality like the Quran?

###162 9/20b: “Those who believe, and suffer exile and strive with their might and main (= fight in raids/wars*), in Allah’s cause, with their goods (= giving money to war expenses*) and their persons (= fighting personally in raids/war or terrorism - “any stratagem of war”*), have the highest rank in the sight of Allah - - -”.

Terrorists (- any stratagem of war" -) and other warriors are doubtlessly the very best Muslims.

In possible future times of troubles - remember that Muslims are ordered to make Islam the dominant religion and to suppress the members of all other religions - the few (? - 30% of Muslims “understands why terrorists do what they do“ according to international polls, though that number varies some*) Muslims living according to the highest “ethics” for Muslims, will make a powerful and efficient 5. column in the West and other places. That is a simple military and security fact.

163 9/51c: “Nothing can happen to us except what Allah has decreed for us - - -”. Well, Islam tells it is the free will of man that brings on bad incidents and life. This verse contradicts that, to say the least of it. So just go safely to war.

A warrior or terrorist can only win - riches and glory or Paradise. (Mutilation, becoming a cripple etc. is never mentioned).

Well, as said he may become a cripple f.x. and live a long life in misery - but that is never mentioned. Also his family may live in misery - also never mentioned.

Also the Quran NEVER mentions that the non-Muslims are humans and what the devastation of their culture and lives means to them - it is of absolutely no consequence and without the slightest interest. The destruction of Persia - and for that case the East Roman culture or the terror in Pakistan/India and Africa - represented long series of terrible dramas and catastrophes for people and culture and science, but the only things which counted - and still counts - for Islam, was a lot of spoils of war - and power and riches for their leaders, and like it or not: Frequently forcing people to become Muslims - frequently by weapons, and always using social and other kinds of pressure - and by extra tax (jizya), often high. Even today we have never met a Muslim able to see this side of their wars or murders or suppression, not to mention what rape and enslavement meant to millions of victims - never to this day, not one single time have we heard a Muslim regret this. Only in the western culture the ability to see the fate of the victims is widespread - a military weak spot, but one of the points which perhaps make the western culture better than some others of the big ones. (To say anything good about the West is politically incorrect, but we do not care for what is politically correct - we are able to think ourselves, and what counts is what is correct, not what is politically correct).

164 9/68e: "- - - for them (the ones not really believing in Muhammad and his Islam*) is the curse of Allah, and an enduring punishment". See 3/77b above.

165 9/74d: "- - - they (hypocrites*) uttered blasphemy (disbelief in Muhammad and the Quran*), and they did it after accepting Islam - - -". One of the greatest sins in Islam is for a Muslim to disbelieve in anything in the book, not to mention leaving the religion - there is in principle death penalty for leaving Islam, and this still is to a degree practiced some places.

166 9/74n: "- - - they (some non-Muslims*) shall have none on earth to protect or help them". Well, there always is the question about f.x. Yahweh - a god the Quran admits exists, even though it wrongly mixes him up with Allah. If he exists and is a god like described in the Quran (= the god borrowed from the Bible) and in the Bible, he is a powerful protector and helper.

167 9/77c: "- - - they (hypocrites*) broke their covenant with Allah - - -". The Quran here tells they had promised Allah something - but that is not a covenant. A covenant is an agreement which all implicated parts say they agree on. Allah in this case had said nothing - claims, but not proved. Thus they had made a promise, not a covenant. Also see 9/75c above.

168 9/93c: "- - - Allah hath sealed their (not believing strong enough to want war*) hearts - - -". See 9/46b+c.

169 9/109d: "And Allah guideth not people that do wrong". What consequence does this have for Muslims, as the Quran partly advices deeds obviously wrong and immoral (f.x. punish a raped woman if she has no 4 male witnesses. And also permits to lie, steal/rob, rape, suppress, kill, etc.). "People who do wrong" also is one of Muhammad’s many negative names for non-Muslims.

Compare "do to others like you want others do to you" to the Quran's moral code. Who are often doing wrong/bad things?

170 9/126a: "See they (non-Muslims*) not that they are tried every year - - -." But why does an omniscient god have to try people, if he knows everything on beforehand? - and what value has a trial if Allah has already decided what is going to happen? - Allah decides everything according to the Quran. The only case where all this makes sense and logic, is if it in reality was Muhammad who had to find "explanations" for why raids for riches and power, and wars for power, were necessary.

171 9/127b: "- - - Allah hath turned their (non-Muslims'*) hearts (from the light) - - -". A good and benevolent god? But then; how much light is there in a book so full of errors and worse, that it is not from any god?

172 10/22b: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) cry unto Allah - - -". Wrong. In desperate need humans - if they seek help from divine powers - call for the god(s) they believe in. This means that if they do not believe in Allah, they call for other god(s) they believe in, and definitely not for Allah.

173 10/23c: "- - - We (Allah*) shall show you (humans*) the truth of all that ye did". Only possible if Allah exists and is a god, none of which is proved - there only exist claims and fast-talk for it.

174 10/31c: “- - - who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?’ They (non-Muslims) will soon say, ‘Allah‘”. Wrong. People of other religions would name their own god (or gods). (Though non-Muslim Arabs at that time might say al-Lah - the old polytheistic Arab top god, a name which sounds like Allah. (In addition the name Allah was somewhat used also before Muhammad, but meaning the old polytheistic god.))

175 10/35h: "What is the matter with you (when you do not believe Muhammad)?" What is matter is simply that one knows too much, and has learnt critical thinking - not only accepting claims - and sees that things are very wrong in the Quran.

176 10/36a: "But most of them (non-Muslims*) follow nothing but fancy." This is true if none of the other religions is a true religion. It also is true for Muslims if the Quran is a made up book - a fancy - - - and it at least is not from a god with that many mistakes, etc. (not to mention if it is from dark forces). It is wrong if the Quran is not from a god, and there somewhere else is a true religion. There f.x. are indications for that Yahweh is not fantasy - if the old books included the Quran tell the truth on this point.

177 10/36e: "Verily, Allah is well aware of all that they (non-Muslims*) do". This definitely is no proved verity/truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) See 2/233h above - if he exists.

178 10/45f: "- - - assuredly those will be lost who denied the meeting with Allah - - -". Often claimed in a book full of mistakes, never documented.

179 10/45g: "- - - assuredly those will be lost who denied the meeting with Allah - - -". Strongly contradicted by the Bible, which do not even mention Allah or Muhammad. According to the Bible what is wrong is to deny Yahweh and/or to accept any other god than him - which of course also has to include the undocumented claimed god Allah, a dressed up pagan god originally named al-Lah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

180 10/71e: "- - - I (Noah*) put my trust in Allah". Contradicted by the Bible, which says his god was Yahweh. (But then Muhammad normally, but wrongly, mixes those two gods - or claimed god(s)). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

181 10/81b: "Moses said: 'What ye (sorcerers*) have brought is sorcery. Allah will surely make it of no effect: for Allah prospereth not the work of those who make mischief". This and much more in this story is not from the Bible. In addition according to the Bible Moses' god was Yahweh, not Allah.

182 10/90e: "I am of those who submit (to Allah in Islam) (= became a Muslim*)". Wrong: We know Ramses II never became a monotheist, not to mention a Muslim - and that he lived for years after the Exodus (if it ever happened) and was a polytheist. This also is one reason for why Islam wants Exodus to have happened earlier and under pharaohs we know less about, included no knowledge's about how they died - Islam propose 1500 - 1600 BC f.x, and even earlier. But this conflicts with what science knows about this - science agree on ca. 1235 BC if it ever happened, which means under Ramses II (or perhaps, perhaps under his son and successor Merneptah).

183 10/93d: "Verily (it definitely is no proved verity/truth*) Allah will judge between them (the Jews*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells this will be Yahweh's job. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

184 10/96-97: “Those (non-Muslims*) against whom the Word of thy Lord (Allah*) hath been verified (the claimed words of Allah = the Quran, have never in any place been verified – there ONLY are the words of Muhammad. Even worse: Muhammad/the Quran use a lot mistaken facts and invalid statements, “signs”, etc. - no omniscient god would ever do that*) would not believe, Even if every Sign was brought unto them - - -”. It may be right that they would not believe those signs, if one talks about the signs in the Quran not borrowed from the Bible, because not one of them is logically valid – they are just unproved statements anyone can use about his/her god(s). But real proofs would have had an effect. And Muhammad was more than intelligent enough to know this, and knew this argument was a lie.

185 10/106d: "(If you call on another god than Allah) "you (a human*) shalt certainly be of those who do wrong". This not proved statement only is correct if the Quran is from a god and in addition tells the full truth and only the truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

186 11/15: "Those who desire the life of the Present and its glitter - to them We (Allah*) shall pay (the price of) their deeds therein - without diminution". At the same time explaining why non-Muslims may have a good life, and claiming they would be punished in the next life - as normal for Muhammad none of these two claims were documented.

187 11/17a (= Medina?): “Can they (non-Muslims*) be like those (Muslims*) who accepted a Clear (Sign) from their Lord (Allah*) - - -?” For building up his followers’ feeling of being superior to “the masses”, this is good psychology. This even more so if you want your followers to become a separate group, feeling distance to other people or groups.

188 11/19b: "Those who would hinder (men) from the path of Allah - - - these were they who denied the Hereafter". Some of them may have denied a next life altogether. But religions with a next life were well known, and nothing strange. But the difference was that Muhammad claimed you would be resurrected in body - piece for piece and atom for atom (but as a young adult) - and this was difficult for many to believe.

189 11/26a: "That ye (the people of Noah*) serve none but Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that the involved god was Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

190 11/26b: "That ye (the people of Noah*) serve none but Allah: verily, I do fear for you the Penalty of a Grievous Day". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See 11/25c above.

191 11/34d: "He (Allah*) is your (people's*) Lord". Only if he exists and is a real god and a top god.

192 11/48b: "- - - Peoples (non-Muslims*) whom We (Allah*) shall grant their (some people*) pleasures (for a time), but in the end will a grievous Penalty reach them from Us (Allah*)". Muhammad's standard explanation for why non-Muslims often had a better life than Muslims: It was/is Allah's unfathomable decision - but take comfort; he will punish them in the end and you will come out on top. There is much comfort to be found in such a belief, especially for small souls.

193 11/75b: "- - - Abraham was - - - given to look to Allah". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells his god was Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

194 11/102a: "- - - He (Allah) chastises - - -". A parallel comment to all other comments about the fact that Allah can do nothing unless he exists - though if he exists and belongs to the dark forces, there are things he can do.

195 11/113e: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) have no protectors other than Allah - - -". Well, omitting everything else, both the Bible and the Quran mention the old Jewish and Christian god - in the Bible named Yahweh or simply God - though the Quran wrongly mixes him up with Allah.

196 12/21h: "And Allah hath full power and control over His (Allah's*) affairs; but most among mankind know it not". With a good reason if Allah does not exist - and hopefully wrong if he exists, but belongs to the dark forces (he definitely is not a god - not to mention a good and benevolent god - if he is behind the Quran and all its errors and the partly immoral moral code, etc.).

197 12/40f: "He (Allah*) hath commanded that ye (Egyptians*) worship none but Him - - -". Wrong. For one thing there nowhere are traces from such an order at that time, and for another there is no such religious debate in the Bible. From where did Muhammad get the information about it?

198 12/52d: "- - - Allah will never guide the false ones". Muhammad had as slogans "War is deceit" and "War is betrayal" - did Allah guide him in such falseness? And what about al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), and Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing)? - or broken oaths (2/225a, 5/89a+b, 16/91e, 66/2a)? (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

199 12/56a: "We (Allah*) bestow Our Mercy on whom We please - - -". There was one under-laying question where there was no rational answer: Why do many bad persons and many non-Muslims have a good life, whereas many Muslims had a difficult life, no matter how pious they were, and no matter how powerful and benevolent the "right" god was?

There may be rational answers to this, but no simple rational answers - and a number of them would be disliked, like 'They work more than you', 'They are cleverer or better educated than you', 'They are more intelligent than you' etc. An intelligent and populist leader should be careful with such answers.

Muhammad came up with the ideal answer. It is irrational, but looks rational, at least for the naive ones, and it fits all situations: 'It is Allah who in his great and unfathomable wisdom who for some reason has decided it so - "on whom We please". Besides it only looks like a good life, because - cool down and sooth yourself and be glad - in the next lift they will be punished hard, whereas you will be rewarded, if you keep on being good and obedient'.

Who can ask questions about an omniscient and benevolent god's fairness and wisdom? And who - at least among the ones who are small inside - does not like to "know" that "they" will be punished? - sometimes it helps nearly as much to know that, as to "know" that you yourself will be rewarded.

200 12/101d: "Thou (here indicated Allah*) art my (Joseph's*) Protector in this world and in the Hereafter". Not possible unless Allah exists and is a god. Also contradicted by the Bible.

201 12/101f: "Take Thou (Allah) my (Joseph's*) soul (at death) as one submitting to Thy (here indicated Allah's*) Will (as a Muslim) - - -". For one thing there is nothing even remotely similar to this in the Bible, and for another: This text is incompatible with the Bible to say the least of it - according to the Bible Joseph's god was Yahweh, not Allah, and according to facts neither science, nor Islam has found one single trace of Muslims/Islam older than 610 AD - Joseph (if he is not fiction) lived some 2500 years earlier.

###202 12/107a: "Do they feel secure from the coming against them - - - the wrath of Allah - - -". Psychology - a leading question leading up to an expected "no" as an answer - Muhammad understood people. But yes: So much is wrong, etc. in the Quran, that it is clear there is no god behind it. Muhammad does not get the answer he tried to pressure from us (and all others). There is no doubt that Islam is a made up religion - f.x. all the wrong facts and other errors in the Quran make that conclusion unavoidable.

Also (we quote): "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar are very often used.

203 12/110b: "But never will be warded off Our (Allah's*) punishment from those who are in sin." We are back to the old fact: This only is true if Allah exists and is a major god - and if the Quran has happened to describe him correctly without the help from any god.

204 13/5d: "- - - their (non-Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". Only if Allah really exists and is a major god, and if the god the non-Muslim happen to believe in, is not a real one - f.x. Yahweh if he is real.

205 13/13b: "Yet these (are the men) who (dare to) dispute about Allah - - -". It takes very little guts to dispute and doubt a claimed god you very honestly believe is a made up one, especially as the doubt and dispute are based on the proved facts that for one thing the only basis for the belief in him is a book of a sorrowful quality, and so full of mistakes, etc. that no god ever was involved in it, and for the other the man behind that book is described even in his own "holy" book as a morally no-good character liking power and money for more power and women - like so many such men through history. Psychologically the belief in Muhammad is worth a study in human ability for being duped by good words, superstition, feelings, fear, and wish for something strong to lean to, and for study of superstition's dominance over knowledge, logic and brain. Allah clearly is a dressed up, non-existing pagan god (al-Lah).

Islam and all its errors in its claimed holy book, also is worth a study of the influence of the fathers' and the surroundings' on the forming of an infant's and child's - and adult's - mind, belief, morality, and life.

206 13/18c: "But these who does not respond to Him (Allah*) (are lost*)." See 13/18a above.

207 13/32d: "- - - I (Allah*) granted respite to the Unbelievers, and finally I punished them - - -". Muhammad's standard explanation for why non-Muslims often had a better life than Muslims: For some reason or other Allah in his unfathomable wisdom had chosen to do it like that - but mind you; sooner or later he was to punish them - if not before, then in the claimed next life. And if there is a next life, and if Allah is the ruler there, and if the Quran has told the truth and only the truth at least about him, it may be true. (For some reason or other Islam - but Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

208 13/37g: "- - - then wouldst thou (non-Muslim or one who has left Islam*) neither protector nor defender against Allah." Not necessary unless he exists - but beware that he may exist in the dark forces, even if he cannot be a god if he is behind something like the Quran.

209 13/37h: "- - - then wouldst thou (non-Muslim or one who has left Islam*) neither protector nor defender against Allah." Contradicted by the Bible, at least regarding believers in Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

210 14/4c: “- - - Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases, and guides whom he pleases - - -.” Not the same god who was behind NT. See f.x. "the lost lamb".

211 14/13e: "We (Allah*) shall cause the wrongdoers (non-Muslims*) to perish". See 3/77b above.

212 14/39b: "Praise be to Allah who granted unto me (Abraham*) in old age Ishmael and Isaac - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Ishmael was a result of Sarah's wish for children in the family (1. Mos. 16/1-4), and Isaac was given by Yahweh (1. Mos. 18/10). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

213 15/3b: “Leave them (the disbelievers*) alone, to enjoy (the good things of this life) and to please themselves - - -.” This was in 621 AD. It did not take long before Allah needed to change and contradict his word, when he started to change his rather peaceful religion to one of inhumanity and blood after the flight to Medina in 622 AD (luckily many Muslims do not live according to those parts if the Quran). This verse is contradicted – made invalid - and often “killed” (abrogated) by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

###214 15/14: "Even if We (Allah*) opened out to them a gate from heaven, and they (disbelievers*) were to continue (all day) ascending therein (they would not believe*) - - -". This is one of the places in the Quran where Muhammad explains away the difficult question why he could prove nothing. ######And it is one of the places where he knew the fast-talk was a lie: If there was opened a gate to Heaven, and people knew it led to Heaven, there would have been a run for it, and "seeing is believing", at least in cases like this - and Muhammad was too intelligent and knew too much about people not to know this. The same goes for any intelligent person today - they know this would be the result. Even intelligent, but brainwashed Muslims know this deep down.

215 15/14+15: “- - - They would only say (when experiencing a miracle*): ‘Our eyes have been intoxicated - - -”. Wrong. At least some had come to believe. These two verses are a piece of fast-talk. There is some fast-talking in the Quran - trying to explain away things and facts and ideas and not least questions which are difficult to explain or answer. See the chapter about fast talk in the Quran. And there are even more fast-talk among Muslims today, trying to explain away mistakes, abrogation, changes in Islam around 622 AD, etc., not to mention trying to present Islam as a peaceful religion. Just in this case one tries to explain away questions for proofs for Allah and for Muhammad's connection to a god.

#####But the really bad thing about this point is that it is one of the points where Muhammad himself knew he was lying – at least some would believe in Islam if he produced miracles or could in other ways prove his claims. He was too intelligent and knew too much about people not to know this – this even more so as he himself told about heathens becoming Muslims after they had experienced miracles (f.x. the magicians of Pharaoh), and he also had a good example in Jesus who got many believers from making miracles – some refused to believe no matter, but quite a number of others did after miracles made by Jesus (made also according to the Quran).

216 15/27a: “And the Jinn race, We (Allah*) had created before - - -". According to this, the jinns were created before man. Jinns are a typical Arabism - something special for Arabia and its surroundings (you f.x. may find djinnies in Jewish folklore and fairy tales - though not in the Bible). They have a not small, but very unclear share of the supernatural part Islam's world, together with spirits, etc.

217 16/23d: ""- - - verily (though it definitely is no proved verity/truth*) He (Allah*) loveth not the arrogant". He does not love even Muslims if he does not exist.

218 16/27b: "- - - He (Allah*) will cover them (non-Muslims*) with shame". The old fact: This only is possible if he exists, and if he in addition is something supernatural - black or white.

219 16/37e: "- - - Allah guideth not such as He leaves to stray, and there is none to help them (non-Muslims*)". As for non-Muslims believing in Yahweh, this is contradicted by the Bible. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

220 16/39a: "(They (non-Muslims*) must be raised up (at the Day of Doom*)), in order that He (Allah*) may manifest to them the truth in what they differ, and that the rejecters of Truth may realize that they had indeed (surrendered to) Falsehood - - -". You are free to believe this if you want.

221 16/45b: "- - - (do non-Muslims*) feel secure that Allah will not cause the earth to swallow them up, or that the Wrath (of Allah*) will not seize them - - -". Pep-talk from Muhammad to his followers.

222 16/61a: “If Allah were to punish men for their wrongdoings - - - - - but He gives them respite for a stated (but unknown*) Term - - -”. This means nothing has to be proved by Muhammad. Good for Muhammad who never was able to prove anything at all.

223 16/63d: "- - - but Satan made, (to the wicked), their own acts seem alluring - - -". But how could this happen, when the Quran so clearly states that Allah decides - even predestines and according to his unchangeable Plan - everything? Remember that free will for man is one of the things not possible even for an omnipotent god, if there is full predestination - not even limited free will. (This is one more claim which is wrong in the Quran). See 14/22b above.

224 16/75a: “Allah set forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave (here aka "infidel") under the dominion of the other - - - and (the other) a man (= Muslim*) on whom We (Allah*) have bestowed goodly favors from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal?” A rhetoric question with only one answer – of course "we" are better than those who are slaves under pagan gods. (Though it is an open question who really were/are blind slaves under their religion, at least in this life – the Pagans/People of the Book or the Muslims? In intense and extreme sects the followers frequently are informal slaves of the leaders – not of the god(s) but of the leader(s)). And what then if there is no Allah in the perhaps next life?

225 16/87a: "That day (the Day of Doom*) shall they (non-Muslims*) (openly) show (their) submission to Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells it will be Yahweh who rules that day, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

###226 16/106a: "Anyone who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief (= doubt or wish to leave Islam*) - - - on them is Wrath from Allah - - -". It is prohibited not only to leave Islam (though many does so nowadays), but even to doubt the teachings - full of mistaken facts or not. Here it is indicated that the punishment is for Allah - remember this is in 622 AD and Muhammad still is weak - it changed later. But you bet this verse counts for the ones who wish to "help" Allah with the punishment.

227 17/10b: "- - - We (Allah*) have prepared for them (non-Muslims*) a Penalty - - -". If he exists - if not this just is a bluff from someone. The fact that the Quran is too full of wrong facts and other errors to come from a god, may indicate this.

228 17/18c: "- - - in the end have We (Allah*) provided Hell for them (sinners*) - - -". Allah, not Iblis provided - a good and benevolent god? Who really is the ruler in Hell? See 3/77b above.

229 17/41a: "We (Allah*) have explained (things) in various (ways) in this Quran - - - but it only increases their (non-Muslims) flight (from the Truth)!" Sometimes explanations make also mistakes more obvious and easy to see.

230 17/45b: "When thou (Muslims*) dost recite the Quran, We (Allah*) put, between you and those who believe not in the Hereafter, a veil invisible". If Allah does not exist and thus is unable to put up a veil, may be a real god does so if any exists - except for War gods, he/she/they might not be interested in souls from war and apartheid religions.

231 17/54d: “We (Allah*) have not sent thee (Muhammad*) to be a disposer of their (“infidels’”*) affairs for them”. Allah or Muhammad started to change his mind about this one year later – in 622 AD – when Muhammad started to gain enough military power to decide “their” religion for them. (In spite of what Islam likes to tell, Islam to a large degree was introduced by the sword – and by the wish for taking part in the looting/robbing/stealing, raping and slave taking – in Arabia). This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

232 17/83b: "When We (Allah*) bestow our favor on man, he turns away - - -". Not strange if he understood that something was very wrong, like f.x. most Jews in Medina did.

###233 17/103c: “- - - We (Allah*) did drown him (Pharaoh Ramses II) and all who were with him.” According to the Bible it was Yahweh, not Allah who did this. (Besides: Ramses II did not drown.)

###234 17/107a: “Say: ‘Whether you believe it or not, it is true that those who were given knowledge beforehand (= Christians and Jews mainly*), when it (the Quran*) is recited to them, fall down on their faces in humble prostration”. One word: Nonsense. Or a stronger word: Propaganda. And what is even worse: The one that composed this verse knew it was a lie – which also Muhammad knew when he made or recited it. A few Jews and Christians are said to have converted by 650 - 656 AD when the Quran is said to be written, though very few if any in 621 when this surah was made, but as a general rule: Utter nonsense. Just look at the history of conflicts between Islam, Jews and Christians, not to mention all the Jews in and near Medina who rather became fugitives or were killed, than to accept Islam – f.x. the Qurayza - and no more is necessary to say. You sometimes meet dishonesty like this in new, emerging religions and sects. It is a way of gaining “weight” for their statements, especially when they have few facts or proofs to show for themselves. Just one small fact that disproves this fairy tale: The 700 Jews of the Qurayza tribe - the last big Jewish tribe in Medina - could have saved their lives and possessions by becoming Muslims in time. To a man they chose not to. This verse contradicts solid historical science and knowledge. And one more fact: Remember that Muslims not only are permitted to lie to defend or forward Islam, but are urged to do it "if necessary" (al-Taqiyya and Kitman - the lawful lie and the lawful half-truth, etc.).

235 18/17e: "- - - he whom Allah leaves to stray - for him wilt thou find no protector to lead him to the Right Way". If the Quran is 100% correct, this may be right - - - if Allah exists. It is wrong if another god exists. It is irrelevant if no god exists.

236 18/28c: "- - - those whose hearts We (Allah*) have permitted to neglect the remembrance of Us - - -". = non-Muslims (= dismissed by Allah = no good ones). As you understand it is Allah who decides who can stay outside Islam - at least according to the Quran (actually it has to be so, as Allah decides and predestines absolutely everything according to Muhammad and the Quran).

237 18/57a: "And who doth more wrong than one who is reminded of the Signs of his Lord (Allah*) but turns away from them - - -". As there never existed any unmistakable signs for Allah (see f.x. 2/39b above), this has little relevance. This may mean Muslims leaving Islam - few sins are greater, and at times and places there have been and are harsh punishment for this - official and/or private.

238 18/106a: "That is their (non-Muslims*) reward, Hell, because they rejected faith - - -". See 3/77b above, and also 18/106a just above.

239 19/69a: "Then We (Allah*) shall certainly drag out from every sect all those who were worst - - -". This just is a claim, not a certainty, among other facts because exactly nothing is proved neither about Allah's existence, nor about his power - or if he in case belongs to the dark forces. And everything is built only on claims from a man of very suspect moral and reliability according to the realities - not the glorious words, but the realities - even in central Islamic books. The only fact which is certain, is that if he is behind the Quran and all its mistakes, etc., Allah is no god.

240 19/72d: "- - - and We (Allah*) shall leave the wrongdoers therein (in Hell*) - - -". Similar answer to 19/72a above, except that this is possible also if he belongs to the dark forces.

241 19/79b: "- - - and We (Allah*) shall add and add to his (non-Muslim's*) punishment". See 3/77b above.

242 19/83b: "Seest thou (Muhammad/Muslims*) not that We (Allah*) have set the Satan against the Unbelievers, to incite them with fury?". An interesting claim - impossible if Allah does not exist, and doubly possible if he exists and belongs to the dark forces (if he is behind the Quran and all its errors, he at least is no god).

243 20/98a: "- - - god of you all (Jews*) is Allah - - -". The Bible disagrees. And so does science, as neither it nor Islam has found a single clear trace of Allah older than 610 AD. And actually also the Quran disagrees, as it proves Yahweh and Allah is not the same god (their teachings are too different, etc.), and it is clear that the god of the Jews was Yahweh (who also in spite of Muhammad's many claims was another and different god).

244 20/124a: "- - - whosoever turns away from My (Allah's*) Message, verily for him is a life narrowed down - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See 20/123d just above.

245 20/131a: "Nor strain thine eyes in longing for things We (Allah*) have given for enjoyment to parties of them (the ones richer than you)". Do not envy the rich ones and the ones with a better life than you - Allah has in his deep wisdom decided it like this - and in the next life you will be the one on top. At least an explanation of differences in life - and a cheap one.

246 21/12b: "- - - when they (non-Muslims*) felt Our (Allah's*) punishment (coming) - - -". There also (see 21/9b) never was one single proved case of Allah punishing anybody. Lots and lots of claims, but never one tingle proved case.

##247 21/30a: “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We (Allah*) clove them asunder?” Heaven is an optical illusion - a fact that is well known today, but Muhammad did not know it - and an illusion cannot be “cloven asunder” from a material thing (like Earth). We also have met Muslims saying that the theory of the Big Bang proves the Quran. But the Big Bang “clove something asunder” 13.7 billion years ago, whereas our sun (Helios or Sun*) is a 3. generation star, and it and the planets included Earth are just 4.6 billion years old (the latest numbers actually are 4.567 billion years). The differences in age, and far more the fact that our sun is 3. generation, (which means that the stuff the earth - and the sun – is made from, has been through two cycles of being fluid and mixed parts of (former) suns that became super novas (exploding stars) and were spread over large parts of cosmos where it mixed with remnants of other exploded super novas and with gas, and at last coalesced to make a new sun and planets) makes the Big Bang totally irrelevant in this connection – for all the first 9 billion years the Earth and the sun and the planets just were scattered atoms, molecules and fragments in a celestial “mixer” – not an Earth, etc. which could be identified and could “be joined together” or “cloven asunder” with the sky. At least the professors at Al-Azhar University know this because these are very well known facts, and it is dishonesty to try to cheat people by using this “argument” in f.x. “The Message of the Quran” - a book pretending to give, as seen from the Muslim point of view, correct information on and explanations of the Quran, certified by one of the highest authorities on the Quran in the Muslim world, the above-mentioned university.

Conclusions: According to the Quran Allah created a quantity of something like smoke, ordered the smoke to “come together”, and afterwards split that mass in 2 – the Earth (actually 7 Earths) in one part, and the heaven as we see it (but actually 7 material heavens according to the Quran - and Islam) in the other part. It should be unnecessary to mention that this has no similarity to what really happened. The Big Bang spread gas – nearly only hydrogen (H), but with traces of helium (He) and perhaps a little lithium (Li), in ionized and thus opaque form – and absolutely no smoke, because even micro particles did not exist yet - over vast realms. After some 300ooo – 380ooo years the gas had cooled enough to be able to combine to molecules (mainly H2) that could condense to stars. The first stars tended strongly to be super giants because the gas in space was by far more tightly packed than today, and thus easier to mop up to make big stars. In the stars H2 was transformed to different atoms up to iron by means of atomic reactions that releases the energy stars “live” from.

But in super giants these reactions runs fast because of very high temperature and pressure. Already after some 10 million years – or more if they were smaller - they explode in super-novas. In the extreme conditions of those explosions the heavier stuff is created – and spewed out into the universe (see 51/47c). There it became parts of the gas clouds which over eons condensed to new stars. The average size now was smaller, for natural reasons – the gas clouds were less dense. Because of somewhat smaller average size, the average “life” was somewhat longer. But even so a large percentage also of this 2. generation stars were big enough to go supernova sooner or later (often still pretty fast) – and then a new circle started. Gas clouds – which now contained a small percentage of other matter than H2 and He – condensed once more to new stars.

And here finally our star – Helios or Sun – fits in. Our sun is a 3. generation star – and because of that there were enough heavy material to make "rock planets" like the Earth.

But heaven and Earth never was smoke. The stars and the sun never made up one mass with a recognizable Earth (another fact that made that impossible: Earth was made 9.1 billion years and trillions of stars later than the universe (see 51/47c)). Not to mention that a recognizable Earth and heaven/stars/etc never were one mass which was split apart leaving the Earth like we know it ready for life and living beings.

The Quran and Muhammad could hardly have been more wrong even if they really had tried to.

248 21/67b: "Have ye (non-Muslims*) no sense (believing in other gods than Allah*)". Muhammad often pretended that to believe in Allah is logical if you are intelligent - for who does not like to be reckoned among the intelligent ones, especially if you are not very intelligent. You meet varieties of this argument not a few places in the Quran. Also see 13/3j above.

249 21/67c: "Have ye (non-Muslims*) no sense (believing in other gods than Allah*)". May be good sense was just what they had - and then saw something was very wrong in the new religion.

250 22/1a: "O Mankind! Fear your Lord (Allah*)!" Muhammad claimed Allah was the god of the entire world. At present he is the nominal god - existing or not existing - for roughly 20% of the world's population (the actual number is very uncertain, but some 1.2 billion). But the number is increasing, partly because of active proselyting (and at the same time hinder or forbid proselyting for other religions or even for telling facts about the Quran or Muhammad in their own countries), and partly because Muslims produce many children - even in modern times when it has become clear that the production of food and other necessities are reaching limits (unless science makes new breakthroughs, but no such ones are expected shortly). One opposing tendency, though, is that 3. generation immigrants into other cultures seems to a degree to lose faith - but this possible tendency is not 100% proved yet.

251 22/3a: "Yet among men there are such as dispute about Allah". Already then - this was approximately 616 AD - many saw that something was very wrong with Muhammad’s new religion. (But most of them were silenced - some by Muhammad's growing military power, some by honest belief, some by their lust for joining the Muslims in looting, enslaving, rape, etc., and some because of pressure or threats or terrorism.)

252 22/3c: "(Some*) - - - dispute Allah, without knowledge - - -". The reason why many of them disputed, was just that they had knowledge and saw something was seriously wrong. But the claim here was better psychology and propaganda.

253 22/8a: "- - - there is among men such a one who disputes about Allah - - -". Some of them because they already at that time saw that something was very wrong in this new religion - f.x. that Muhammad's references to the Bible often were wrong, sometimes horribly wrong. Quite likely some even recognized the real sources - apocryphal (made up) scriptures, legends, and fairy tales - for his tales.

254 22/8c: "- - - disputes about Allah, without Knowledge - - -." In religion like in all other aspects of life there exists no knowledge without proofs - only belief. The belief may be strong - even so strong that you believe it is knowledge or feel sure it is knowledge. But just the same goes for all strong believers in all religions - - - and most of all those religions are wrong if one of the big excluding religions is right. Islam is one of the many religions where absolutely nothing is proved - Islam even admits that Allah cannot be proved, but only when they are forced to speak the truth. Islam is only built on belief. There is no real knowledge.

255 22/35e: "- - - out of what (wealth*) We (Allah*) have bestowed upon them (Muslims*)". It is Allah who gives you everything according to the Quran - not unlike 11/7a above. But they had to produce or steal the wealth themselves - NOTHING ever was proved to really be a gift from a god, not to mention for the claimed god Allah.

256 22/44c: "- - - I (Allah*) granted respite to the Unbelievers - - -". This is Muhammad's most used "explanation" for why bad people living a good life are not punished at once by Allah.

####257 22/46d: "Truly it is not their eyes that are blind (as they do not believe in the Quran and in Muhammad*) - - -". What the Quran forgets(?) to mention, is that Muslims are victims for just the same human dilutions like others: A blind heart and a blind brain are blinder than a blind eye or a deaf ear. This is the only possible reason why they do not see all the many big and small errors, etc. in the Quran - they are unable to or unwilling to see, or are unable to face the terrifying fact that something is horribly wrong with one of the basic elements they have built their culture and lives on.

258 22/48a: "And how many populations did I (Allah*) give respite, which were given to wrongdoings?" A theme often returned to in the Quran: Why some non-Muslims live a good life - and many Muslims not: It is Allah's decision - but be soothed; he will punish them in the end.

259 22/71d: "- - - things for which no authority has been sent down to them, and of which they have (really) no knowledge - - -". As the Quran is not from a god - no god makes such and so many mistakes, contradictions, cases of invalid logic, etc. - what is then the authority behind the Quran and Islam? This even more so as all the believed knowledge only rests on a book full of mistakes, dictated by a man of very doubtful morality, and nothing more - except the never proved belief of the forefathers who believed in that book.

260 22/72e: "It is the (Fire of Hell)! Allah has promised it to the Unbelievers!" A promise worth nothing if Allah is a made up god. But for that: See 3/77b above.

261 22/74a: "No just estimate have they (non-Muslims*) made of Allah - - -". If Allah sent down the Quran, many non-Muslims have made a just estimate of him. And if he does not exist, but is a made up pagan god, also many or most non-Muslims have made just estimates.

162 23/55-56b: “Do they (people*) think that because We have granted them abundance in wealth and sons, We would hasten them on in every good? Nay, they do not understand”. The rich ones have gotten their fortunes from Allah whether they are Muslims or not (the non-Muslims will be punished in the next life, though). Also see 12/57 above.

263 23/64c: "Until We (Allah*) seize in Punishment those of them (bad people*) who received the good things of this world - - -". This is a subject Muhammad often returned to: The reason why what he claimed were bad people could have a good life whereas good Muslims often had a miserable one, was that the wise Allah in his deep wisdom and for reasons mere humans could not understand had decided it so. But be soothed - he will punish them in the next life if not before, and then you will be the better off. "Schadenfreude" helps quite a lot - good psychology.

264 25/4b: "But the Misbelievers say: "Naught is this but a lie which he (Muhammad*) has forged - - -". Already then some people saw that things might be seriously wrong - but Muhammad became military too strong. (Arabia to a large degree was won for Islam by the sword (and not only Arabia) and the by attraction of becoming rich from stealing/looting.)

265 25/11e: "We (Allah*) have prepared a Blazing Fire for such (non-Muslims*) - - -". If he exists and in addition is either a god or a devil (dressed up like Gabriel, Muhammad would not have a chance to see the difference between a dressed up Iblis/the Devil and Gabriel - this even more so as he had never seen Gabriel before in case).

266 25/21b: "Such as fear not the meeting with Us (Allah*) - - -". (The Swedish translation here says: "Such ones who have no hope of meeting us"). Non-Muslims. But there is little reason for such fear, because it is clear there is no god behind the Quran - too much is wrong in that book.

267 25/37d: "- - - We (Allah') have prepared for (all) wrongdoers a grievous Penalty". Who wants to befriend such people? (It is easy to forget that it only is true if Allah exists and is a major god - and if the Quran in addition has described him correctly.)

268 25/38-39b: “- - - also ’Ad and Thamud and the People of the Rass (3 large tribes “borrowed” from Arab folklore, except one does not know who "the People of the Rass" refer to*), and many generations between them - - - and each one We (Allah*) broke to utter annihilation - - -”. It is not easy for Yahweh/God to compete with all this wholesale slaughter, even if Yahweh was a bit bloody until the Jews had found their home and for some time after that. We may add that at least the 'Ad and the Thamud according to the Quran lived before Abraham = some 2ooo or more years BC, whereas the correct - it is likely they once existed - according to science is some 1500 years or more later - later than Abraham, later than Moses. Quite a mistake.

269 25/39a: "- - - and each one ('Ad, Thamud, the Rass*) We (Allah*) broke to utter annihilation (for their sins)". There were ruins and there were folk tales about former tribes in and around Arabia. Muhammad claimed they were all from people destroyed because of sins against Allah. Science points to other possibilities in a harsh and warlike area.

#270 25/42d: "- - - who is most mislead in the Path!" As the Quran with all its errors is from no god, this is a very open question. But there is a chance that "the narrow road" of Jesus is real. And if all religions are made up - which is not unlikely as no gods show their existence - the war and suppression religion Islam is one of the most inhuman ones, whereas Christianity like it is described in NT (do not protest until you have read the NT) and Buddhism likely are the most human ones, at least of the big religions, and thus alternatives for the ones needing or unable to give in the "higher spheres". Islam is the only of the big religions which itself (in the Quran) really proves things are seriously wrong with the religion, as all the mistakes in a book pretended made/sent down by a god, proves it is from no god.

271 25/50b: "- - - most men are averse (to aught) but (rank) ingratitude". It is not ingratitude not to thank Allah, if he did not do the job - and nothing about neither his existence, nor about his job was ever documented.

272 25/55f: "- - - his (the skeptic's*) own Lord (Allah*) - - -". Only if Allah exists and is a major god, and only if the non-Muslim does not happen to believe in a real god.

273 25/77b: "- - - if ye (non-Muslims*) call not on Him (Allah*) - - -". But what would be the idea of calling on him when everything all the same is predestined according to many places in the Quran?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

###274 26/46-47: "Then did the sorcerers fall down, prostrate in adoration, Saying 'We believe in the Lord of the Worlds - - -". For one thing this is not from the Bible. But much more serious in this connection is that #### this is one of the proofs for that Muhammad knew he was lying each time he explained away his inability to produce any miracle as a proof for his god and for his own connection to a god, with that Allah did not want because it would make no-one believe in Allah anyhow. Here Muhammad is telling - early in his career and before many of those "explaining" away - about a minor miracle which made all those sorcerers suddenly become ardent believers in just Allah. Also see 26/51 below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

275 26/89a: "But only he (will prosper) that brings to Allah a sound heart - - -". Correct only if Allah exists, if Allah sent down the Quran, and if the Quran tells the full and only truth. Wrong if not.

276 26/97b: "By Allah (an oath*), we (non-Muslims*) were truly in error manifest". Only true if Allah exists, is a major god and is correctly described in the Quran. Definitely not true if they follow an real god (if such one do exist).

277 26/205-206: “Seest thou? If We (Allah*) do let them enjoy (this life) for a few years (anything is “few” compared to eternity*), Yet there comes to them at length the (punishment) which they were promised!” Even if you think it is unjust that non-Muslims do well and you not, calm down – it just is a result of Allah’s Plan and his endless wisdom, and rest assured; they will be punished in the next life and you come out on top.

278 27/60f: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are a people who swerve from justice". Not if they happen to believe in a real god (if such one exists). And especially not if the Quran is a made up book - and it proves itself that it is not from any god, as no god would sully his name by being involved in a book where so much is wrong. Besides: Many nations have laws more just and with better moral and ethics than the sharia laws of Islam. (Some of the paragraphs in sharia are horrible).

#279 28/50e: "For Allah guides not people given to wrongdoing." Once more a deep difference in the teachings of the Quran and the NT: Just these ones are "the lost lambs" NT/Jesus/Yahweh tries to reach more than any others with guidance. (Luke 15/8-10 + 15/11-31 and Matt. 18/12-14 + 20/8-13).

280 28/59c: "- - - nor are We (Allah*) going to destroy a population except when its members practice iniquity". Does this mean that whenever there are f.x. natural catastrophes the victims are bad people? - f.x. the Muslims of North Sumatra in the Tsunami? (Also others were hit in that tsunami, but Muslims by far hardest.)

281 28/61d: "- - - one to whom We (Allah*) have given the good things of this life, but who, on the Day of Judgment, is to be brought up (for punishment) - - -". Muhammad's standard explanations for why some non-Muslims had a good life, whereas some Muslims had a miserable one: Allah’s unfathomable decision. But sooth yourself: They will be punished in the end, and Muslims come out on top (this is a strange thing - in all ideologies the leaders tells that the ones who obeys them and follow the ideology, are the ones who will in some way or other come out on top).

282 28/75e: “- - - then they (the non-Muslims*) shall know that the Truth is in Allah (alone) - - -”. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) That is to be hoped that if Allah is a god. But judging from the Quran, at most in him is partly the truth.

283 29/11a: "And Allah most certainly knows those who believe, and as certainly those who are Hypocrites". See 2/233h above.

284 29/49f: "- - - none but the unjust reject Our (Allah's*) Signs." Wrong. They also are rejected at least by everyone who see that the claimed "signs" are just lose and never proved claims, and thus without value as indication or proof for Allah or for Muhammad's connection to a god. And they are not "believers", but "knowers".

285 29/63a: “And if indeed thou ask them (non-Muslims*) who it is that sends down rain from the sky - - - they will certainly reply, ’Allah’”. Wrong. If they at all had mentioned a god, they had mentioned their own god – or the one of them that has to do with rain. Also see f.x. 11/7a and 29/61a+d above.

286 30/45e: "For He (Allah*) loves not those who reject Faith". One more deep difference between the Quran and NT: According to the Bible Jesus and Yahweh loves every human being and tries to give them the chance for salvation till the very end (f.x. Luke 15/8-10 + 15/11-31 and Matt. 18/12-14 + 20/8/13). Allah loves only the Muslims. The same god and religion?

287 30/53a: "Nor canst thou (Muhammad*) lead the blind (the ones refusing to believe in Muhammad*) back from their straying (and to Islam*)". Non-Muslims = blind. But who is most blind; the one able to see, but who is accused of being blind, or the one refusing to see?

288 31/24a: "We (Allah*) grant them (well off non-Muslims*) their pleasure for a while: in the end shall we drive them to their chastisement unrelenting." There is a saying: "Good luck is good, but others' bad luck is not too bad either" - especially when you are envious. Muhammad was a good knower of humans and utilized this psychological effect frequently. This also was Muhammad's standard explanation for why some "bad" persons had a good life whereas good Muslims sometimes had a bad one - Allah's unfathomable wisdom.

289 31/25a: “If thou ask them who it is that created the heavens (plural and wrong once more*) and the earth, they will certainly say, ‘Allah’”. Wrong. If they believe a god created this, they certainly will name their own god(s) - though in the old Arabia this might have been the polytheistic god al-Lah. (But here is a hidden, but clear Arabism: The likeness of the pronunciation of al-Lah and Allah hides the difference when spoken - just like when the Muslims use the word God instead of Allah speaking to non-Muslims - it on the surface camouflages some of the fundamental differences there are between Allah and God/Yahweh for people with little knowledge.)

It is very clear according to the Quran that the creator is Allah. You find that statement – but never a proof – at least in these verses: 10/3 – 11/7 – 21/30 – 21/32 – 23/17 – 25/59 – 30/22 - 32/4 – 35/1 – 39/5 – 41/11 – 41/12 – 50/38 – 51/47 – 79/28. Also see 11/7a and 21/56c above.

290 31/32d: "But none reject Our (Allah's*) Signs except only a perfidious ungrateful (wretch)!" There is at least one group more: The ones who are intelligent enough and with enough knowledge to see that none of the so-called signs or proofs tell anything clear at all about Allah, unless it is proved he really causes the effect. Totally without any logical value, and something anyone can say about his/her god(s) free of charge.

291 31/33j: "- - - deceive - - - about Allah". Who is deceived - the blind believer or the one who sees that serious things are wrong in the Quran?

292 32/22a: “And who does more wrong than one to whom are recited the Signs of his Lord (Allah*), and who then turns therefrom?” There is nothing wrong in being skeptical to a religion built only on a book with many mistakes and not one single valid proof, but with many “signs” and “proofs” without any value or even 100% wrong, which may have the effect of cheating uneducated or not intelligent persons - and on top of all told only by a man whose honesty normal, intelligent people would suspect because of the morality of his deeds and some of his words – when a man preaches good, but does and demands many things bad, we any day believe in his deeds and demands more than in his words. This even more so that it is clear he accepted - and personally used - dishonesty as a working tool.

293 33/17b: "Who can screen you (people*) from Allah - - -". Anyone if Allah does not exist - and there also is the Question of f.x. Yahweh.

294 33/24c: “- - - Allah may reward the men of Truth (Muslims*) - - - and punish the Hypocrites if that be His Will - - -”. A sure way to always have an explanation: "If that be Allah’s will". And the same can explain any injustice Allah or Muhammad would not - or could not - rectify.

295 33/57b: "Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger - Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter - - -". You had better not annoy Muhammad (Allah is able to take care of himself). The ultimate dream position for any dictator.

###296 33/60e: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad Muslims or non-Muslims*) - - -". To twist an old proverb: This sentence alone tells more than a 1000 choice slogans about "the religion of peace". What you say when you forget to guard your words or do not think it necessary, always by far is more reliable than carefully chosen claims. Also see next comment just below.

#####297 33/60f: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad or not Muslims*), then they will not be able to stay in it (the city*) as thy neighbor’s for any length of time". This tells as much as the comment just above. Something to remember when you accept Muslims to your city? There already are demands for special treatment for Muslims many places. We remind you that most - at least 70% on average according to research - are as ok as you and me. But the problem is: Who is who?.

298 33/64c: "Verily, Allah has cursed the Unbelievers - - -". Only perhaps true if Allah exists and is a major god - - - and if the Quran in addition has told the full truth and only the truth about him.

299 35/10i: "- - - and the plotting of such will be void (of result)". Sometimes true, sometimes not true. But is it Allah who decides? - never proved in case.

#300 35/15a: "O ye men! It is ye that have need of Allah - - -". Only if Allah exists and is a major god. That is to say, there are humans (5-10%?) who likes or needs something strong to lean to, but they only need the belief. They are helped if they just believe strongly enough in a god/gods. It does not mean anything which one or ones, as long as they believe it is reality. Because of this human trait, you find such persons in any and all religions - 100% sure that they are right and with the right god(s). Partly because of the strong religious social and judicial pressure in Islam, you find a lot of them in that religion, as such pressure combined with one-sided information makes it easier for such tendencies to manifest themselves.

301 35/26e: "- - - how (terrible) was My (Allah's*) rejection (of them) (non-Muslims*)!" One of the many things Allah cannot do unless he exists and is something supernatural.

302 35/39c: "- - - if, then, any do reject (Allah), their rejection (works) against themselves - - -". This may be correct if Allah exists and is a god - but only if that god is correctly described in the Quran. If he does not exist, it is better to leave the Quran, partly because of that the ethical, moral, and judicial codes at points are very immoral and inhuman there. And if Allah exists and is part of the dark forces, it definitely is better to look for some other leader.

303 36/8a: "(Allah has) their (non-believers*) heads forced up (and they cannot see (the road to Paradise*))". One more case of serious difference between the Quran and NT with its new covenant: Yahweh would never, never, make the slightest hindrance for anyone at all, on the way to Paradise according to NT - at least not without a good reason, and here the reason just is that they are not Muslims, and here are robbed the possibility to become such. Yahweh and Allah so definitely are not the same god - and Jesus and Muhammad not in the same religion.

304 37/34b: "Verily that is how We (Allah*) shall deal with Sinners". If Allah is reality, and if there is reality and truth in the Quran. Also see 37/12b above.

305 39/45a: "When Allah, the One and Only, is mentioned, the hearts of those who believe not in the Hereafter are filled with disgust and horror - - -." This may be because of the war mentality and the partly immoral moral and ethical codes. In addition there are disbelief, because something is seriously wrong in the Quran, and thus in the religion of Islam.

306 39/51d: "- - - and they ("wrongdoers"*) will never be able to frustrate (our (Allah's*) Plan)". The predestination again: Allah decides everything and nothing can change his decisions and Plan.

###307 37/63aa: "For We (Allah*) have truly (definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim*) made it (to eat the fruit of the zaqqum tree - a tree said to grow in Hell*) as a trial for the wrongdoers".### One more strong indication for that Allah also is the creator and ruler of Hell. What then is left of the claimed good and benevolent god Allah?

308 39/67a: "No just estimate have they (non-Muslims*) made of Allah - - -". But the reality is: If they have understood the problem with all the errors, etc. in the Quran correctly, maybe it is they who have understood the book and the religion correctly.

309 40/4a: “None can dispute about the Signs of Allah but the Unbelievers”. This may be absolutely correct, though the correct expression may be "are permitted to" not "can":

  1. It is a reason for social extrication in Muslim societies to doubt any word in the Quran.
  2. It is a reason for imprisonment in some Muslim countries to doubt too much or deny belief in the Quran. (March 2008: A woman in Malaysia, Kamariah Ali, was just (2007? AD) sentenced to 2 years of prison for being inconsistent with Islam. The judge, Mohammad Abdullah, told she had committed a grave offence, and that the sentence was in the public interest.)
  3. It is a good reason in some countries and in some societies for being murdered by Muslims if you express too much doubt in the Quran, not to mention in Muhammad - the weak link in the religion (the only claimed witness and not a very holy character).
  4. It still is a reason for death penalty - official or unofficial - in some Muslim areas to doubt too much in the Quran, not to mention to want to leave Islam.
  5. His/her marriage is automatically void and ended the moment a Muslim leaves Islam - and not everyone wants to lose his wife or her husband or the mother or father of their children (not to mention lose their children).
  6. Even for non-Muslims it is dangerous to doubt the signs and the Quran - they may be murdered. Islam do not trust the power of the word - with a reason, thinking about all the mistakes and invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”, etc. in the Quran - and resort to pressure or murder. It is better to believe in the never proved religion of the fathers, than to try to find out if it really is true. Like Islam says when “hunting” for proselytes: It is difficult to question your (heathen*) deepest beliefs and what you were imprinted as a child". They forget that this also goes for Muslims: Better not to control if what you believe in, is right or wrong - and to run the risk of not finding the right religion (if one exists) in time, if Islam is wrong.

Yes, many places only non-Muslims can - or actually are permitted to - discuss or dispute the signs of Islam. And even for us it is so dangerous, that this book cannot be printed unless the printer is very brave, in spite of the book being very down-to-earth and based entirely on the Quran and other central Islamic literature + correct scientific knowledge.

*310 40/4b: “None can dispute about the Signs of Allah but the Unbelievers”. Wrong in reality - Muslims can, but only are not permitted to. There is no reason why it is not possible for Muslims to discuss them, too, except religious ideas and prohibitions. And they should do so, as none of the religious claims in the Quran are valid proofs (they rest on thin air or unproved claims or statements) of Allah. A few taken from the Bible may prove Yahweh, but absolutely none proves or even indicates Allah. They f.x. can be used by any priest in any religion about his god(s).

311 40/47a: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) will dispute with each other in the Fire!" Nonsense. If they are resurrected in a body like on Earth, like the Quran states many places, and if the pain is even in the neighborhood of what the Quran states - and like anybody who has burnt themselves a little has felt - they will be unable to dispute.

312 40/61d: "- - - most men give no thanks (to Allah*)". For the simple reason that at least many of them see that something is seriously wrong with that religion.

313 40/74b: "Thus does Allah leave the Unbelievers to stray". This he only can do if he exists and in addition is a god. If not, their behavior is because of something else.

Besides: Compare this to "the lost coin" (Luke 15/8-10), "the lost sheep" (Matt.18/12-14), "the lost son" (Luke 15/11-31), "the 11. hour" (Matt.20/8-13). Not the same gods, Jesus and Muhammad not in the same religion.

314 41/40h: “Which is better? - he that is cast into the Fire, or he that comes safe through - - -”. But as the Quran is not from any god - Allah or whoever - who is who?

315 41/52c: "Who is more astray than one who is in a schism far (from any purpose (here Islam*))?" The answer depends on two things: Does Allah exist - and is he in case a major god. And on: Do other gods - f.x. Yahweh exist?

Besides: Who is most astray - the one strongly believing in a book full of errors, or the one able to ask questions about the mistakes and worse?

316 42/8h: "- - - the wrongdoers will have no protector or helper". This may be wrong if there exist other gods - f.x. Yahweh, whom also the Quran admits exists, even though it wrongly mixes him up with Allah. This even more so if the Quran is a made up book and Islam thus a made up religion - and Allah a made up god.

317 42/8i: "- - - the wrongdoers will have no protector or helper". See 42/8g just above. In addition there is this big gap between who is a wrongdoer in the war religion Islam, and in the NT. A wrongdoer in Islam, simply may be a god or even very good person in a normal religion - - - and then he may qualify for f.x. Yahweh's Paradise.

318 42/13h: "- - - to those (non-Muslims*) who worship other things (gods*) than Allah, hard is the (way) to which thou (Allah*) callest them". If Allah exists. If he is a major god. And if he is correctly described in the Quran in spite of all its errors, etc.

319 42/13i: "- - - to those (non-Muslims*) who worship other things (gods*) than Allah, hard is the (way) to which thou (Allah*) callest them". As far as followers of Yahweh go, this is contradicted by the Bible. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

###320 43/19d: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) will be called to account!" By whom? As the Quran is not from any god, it is highly unlikely that the old pagan god al-Lah/Allah really is a real god, named only Allah or not.

321 43/25a: "So We (Allah*) exacted retribution from them (non-Muslims*) - - -". One of the nearly legion never proved claims and tales in the Quran - and not possible unless Allah existed and was something supernatural, white or dark.

322 43/40a: "Canst thou then make the deaf hear, or give directions to the blind or to such as (wander) in manifest errors?". The contra question here is: Can Allah? There have been many big words about Allah in the Quran and in Islam, but not one single clear act or proof. There are many such cases of big words in the Quran, and the reason why we stop at just this verse, is that this was just the kind of things Jesus did if the books - included the Quran - tell the truth about such things. But Muhammad and the Quran did exactly nothing except using lose words, excuses, and not the shaved whisker of a mosquito of an act or a proof - - - and cheap words are the domain of cheats and deceivers, bluffers and swindlers.

323 43/42d: "- - - verily We (Allah*) shall prevail over them (non-Muslims*)". Only if Allah exists and is a major god - - - and only if they do not believe in an existing god - f.x. Yahweh, whom both the Bible and the Quran claims exists (even though the Quran wrongly mixes him up with Allah).

324 43/54b: "- - - truly were they (the people of Egypt*) a people rebellious (against Allah). (Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim*.)" Allah was not a known god in Egypt around 1235 BC. You cannot rebel against something or someone you do not even know about. (Though of course Muhammad here meant Yahweh, and wrongly mixed him up with Allah).

##325 43/56: “And We (Allah*) made them a people of the past - - -”. Wrong. Neither Ramses II nor the people of Egypt became a people of the past around the year 1235 BC (the approximate year of the possible Exodus, according to science). That did not happen until much later – and the final doom came in 659 AD when the Arabs under Mu’awiya conquered the country and took over - forever (?). Muslims like to “explain” that “a people” mean the soldiers of Pharaoh. But the expression “a people” has a wider meaning than that.

326 46/5a: "And who is more astray than one who invokes besides Allah such as will not answer him (also Allah has never clearly answered anybody - if Islam could prove such an unmistakable answer, you bet they had told about it*) to the Day of Judgment, and who (in fact) are unconscious to their call (on them)- - -" If the Quran is without mistakes and tells only and the full truth, all non-Muslims are astray. If there are mistakes in the Quran, then all Muslims are astray - because then the book is not from a god, and Islam is a false religion - (and most likely also a lot of non-Muslims, as hardly all gods are real). (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

327 46/10g: "- - - Allah guides not a people unjust". Allah is no good guide for anyone if his guidebook is the Quran with all its errors, etc.

328 47/4a: “Therefore, (because Allah wants it!! - see 47/3*) when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks - - -.” A clear order.

##329 47/4b: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight (and remember the Muslims practically always were the aggressors – to gain riches and slaves and power - - - and some new proselytes*)), smite at their necks - - -.” Surah 47 is from 622 AD and Mecca, but some verses likely from Medina – and it is possible to see the change towards war already. It contradicts and abrogates a lot of peaceful verses. This verse contradicts (and abrogates) at least these verses (here are 88 out of the 124 Muslim scholars say are abrogated by 9/5): 2/109, 2/190, 2/256, 2/272, 3/20, 4/62, 4/81, 4/90, 5/3, 5/28, 5/48, 5/99, 6/60, 6/66, 6/70, 6/104, 6/107, 6/112, 6/158, 7/87, 7/188, 7/193, 7/199, 8/61, 9/68, 10/41, 10/99, 10/102, 10/108, 11/12, 11/121, 13/40, 15/3, 15/94, 16/35, 16/82, 16/125, 16/126, 16/127, 17/54, 18/29, 18/56, 19/39, 20/130, 21/107, 21/112, 22/49, 22/68, 23/54, 23/96, 24/54, 26/216, 27/92, 28/50, 28/55, 29/18, 29/46, 32/30, 34/25, 34/28, 35/23, 35/24a, 36/17, 39/41, 41/34, 42/6, 42/15, 42/48, 43/83, 43/89, 44/59, 45/14, 46/9, 46/135a, 46/135b, 46/135b, 50/39, 50/45, 51/50-51, 51/54, 52/45, 52/47, 53/29, 67/26, 73/10, 73/11, 79/45, 86/17, 88/22, 109/6. They are all quoted under 9/5. (At least 91 contradictions).

####330 47/4c: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them) - - -.” BUT OUR SOURCES TELL THAT THE WORDS “(in fight)” IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE ARAB TEXT – IT IS ADDED BY THE TRANSLATOR (and by more than one). Muslims primarily shall read the Quran in Arab, and there, in case our sources are correct, ######the text is: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers, smite at their necks - - -“. It in case simply is a permanent order to be aggressive.

The real "religion of peace". And of honesty.

331 47/4h: "- - - He (Allah*) could certainly have exacted retribution from them (non-Muslims*) (Himself) - - -". This may be a bluff as there never was a single proved such case - numbers of claims, but never a proved case.

332 47/8d: "- - - (Allah) will send their (non-Muslims'*) deeds astray (from their mark)". Also this Allah cannot do unless he exists and is something supernatural. And as bad deeds according to the Quran may be good deeds according to especially NT and its new covenant (f.x. Luke 22/20), and the other way around - and the differences at places are huge - perhaps Yahweh will intervene?

As parts of the moral code in the Quran are very negative and far from in normal moral codes, and very "black", there is a possibility for that the moral code - and by implication thus Islam - is dictated by the dark forces, if such ones exists. But it can also have been dictated by a cold and/or scheming human brain - or a sick brain. If dictated by a human brain - in case likely Muhammad's - the wish for power is/was a sufficient motif. In the case of Muhammad the wish for power in case was strengthened by a wish for riches for bribes and for women. All these 3 wishes is easy to see behind the words many places in the Quran and not less in the Hadiths.

333 47/9a: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) hate the Revelation of Allah (the Quran) - - -". Some may do so, as they see how dark the Quran is, and that it cannot come from a god with all those errors - and definitely not from a good god with that moral code. But most just wonder what is wrong with the intelligence and nature of man, which make it possible for millions to believe in a book where so much obviously and clearly is so seriously wrong that no god can be involved. And marketed by a man of that quality!

334 47/11d: "- - - (non-Muslims*) have no protector". We are back to what is claimed in the Quran vs. f.x. in the Bible. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs. Besides according to the Bible: The Bible tells that Yahweh is a good protector for his followers. And also the Quran admits that Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him up with Allah.

335 47/16e: "- - - men whose hearts Allah has sealed - - -". "The lost lamb/sheep", "the 11. hour", etc. The same god as Yahweh in the Bible, not to mention in the "new covenant" (= Jesus' teaching in the NT)? "Nyet" - which is a good English word meaning a very strong NO. (The word actually is Russian - the most well-known Russian word in the times after WW2.)

336 47/23c: "- - - He (Allah*) made them (sinners, non-Muslim*) deaf and blinded their sight". Compare to Yahweh and f.x. his "lost sheep" (Matt. 18/12-14). Yahweh the same god as Allah? Impossible.

337 47/28c: "- - - He (Allah*) made their (non-Muslims'*) deeds of no effect". This Allah could not do unless he exists. Besides history shows that non-Muslims' deeds often had more effect than Islam's. And as there are big differences in what is good and bad for Yahweh and for Allah, may be Yahweh liked them? Such big gaps as there are at many points between especially NT and the Quran, that easily would be possible.

338 47/32f: "- - - He (Allah*) will make their (non-Muslims'*) deeds of no effect". This Allah could not do unless he exists. Besides history shows that non-Muslims' deeds often had more effect than Islam's. And as there are big differences in what is good and bad for Yahweh and for Allah, may be Yahweh liked them? Such big gaps as there are at many points between especially NT and the Quran, that easily would be possible.

###339 48/6b: "- - - He (Allah*) may punish (non-Muslims*) - - - who imagine an evil opinion about Allah". Whether the opinion is true or not, is not a question - if they even imagine a bad opinion about Allah, that is punishable. A fact to be remembered: If you think or express something negative about Allah, you can be punished. Also if you are not a Muslim yourself.

In practical life Muslims often are not too quick to punish for not being too strong in the belief in Allah - though there are wide areas where you should be careful. But be more careful with saying negative things about Muhammad, even very true things. The reason is that all Islam is built only on the words of Muhammad, and the historical, real Muhammad was very far from the glorious semi-saint Islam wants him to look like. If something is wrong with Muhammad or his Quran - and a lot is - all Islam is wrong. Therefore no negative information can be accepted - true or not true. If Muhammad is showed in his real being, the Quran, and thus Islam is proved invalid and wrong (the same if there are proved mistakes in the Quran - which there are plenty of, but which Muslims refuse to see). And it is better to believe strongly in the religion your fathers and surroundings claim is the correct one, than to face the fact that your life may be built on a false religion. This no matter what price you may have to pay if there is a next life and a real god, but not the one of your and your fathers' fiction.

340 48/6f: "- - - He (Allah*) has cursed them and got Hell ready for them (non-Muslims*)". This he cannot do unless he exist and in addition is either a god or a devil.

341 48/16i: "- - - He (Allah*) will punish you (Bedouins*) with a grievous Penalty (for not going on raids and to war*)". The good and benevolent god for "the religion of peace"?

342 50/14b: "- - - My (Allah's*) warning was duly fulfilled (in them (the sinning people*))". There has never in the entire history and before been even one proved case of a warning from Allah, not to mention the fulfilling of one - Just listen to Islam's total silence about proved cases. Lots of lose claims, never a proved case.

##343 50/28: "I (Allah*) had already sent you (non-Muslim*) Warning". To what avail and for what reason if you had predestined everything for me according to your Plan which nothing and nobody can change, so that I had no choice but to do and say exactly what you had predestined?!

344 50/45b: “We (Allah*) know best what they (the “infidels”*) say; ###and thou (Muhammad*) art not one to overawe them by force.” Knowing the 22 – 24 surahs from Medina, and knowing the later history of aggression that Islam has behind it, this verse is a big, ironic or sardonic joke. This surah is from 614 AD: Just you guess if it was contradicted and abrogated from 622 AD on!! This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by reality and by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

345 51/14a: "Taste ye (non-Muslims*) your trial (Hell*)!". But why - WHY - does a predestining, omniscient god need to try and test people!??? ###And does Allah's sending them to Hell indicate that he also is the master of Hell? - many points in the Quran indicate this, and also a number of Muslim scholars believe so. What does this in case tell about the claimed "good and benevolent" Allah?

346 52/43a: "Or have they (non-Muslims*) a god other than Allah?" Many had - some might even have a true god, like Yahweh perhaps was and is (for sure if one believes either the Bible or the Quran on this point - though the Quran wrongly mixes him up with Allah).

347 53/30c: "- - - (Allah*) knoweth best those who stray from His Path, and He knoweth best those who receive guidance". See 2/233h above.

348 55/41a: "- - - the sinners will be known by their Marks - - -". Does an omniscient god need marks to recognize sinners?

349 58/19d: "- - - he (Satan*) has made them (non-Muslims*) lose the remembrance of Allah". This in case means Satan has more influence than Allah.

This sentence also referring to Muhammad's claim that once upon a time everyone were Muslims, but false teachings and falsified holy books lead all people astray. The claim is proved wrong, as neither science nor Islam has found one single unmistakable trace of Muslims older than 610 AD, when Muhammad started his teaching.

The claim, though, tells that Allah in case was such a weak god, that any made up god(s) beat him every place all over the world.

350 58/20a: "Those who resists Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) will be among those most humiliated". So whatever you do, do not even think about resisting Muhammad! Allah is a dream god for any dictator - is he really real? - or is he made to measure for Muhammad? The fact that the Quran is too full of mistaken facts, etc. to be from a god, and also that the god so often was used as a factor in his private life or to intervene for him in the community, may make one think.

351 61/7c: "And Allah guides not those who do wrong". Allah cannot guide anyone very well as long as he uses a guidebook full of mistakes and with a partly immoral moral code.

352 62/7d: "And Allah knows well those who do wrong". The hard fact: Not unless he exists and is something supernatural.

353 63/3d: "- - - a seal were set to their (the ones leaving Islam*) hearts - - -". The claimed benevolent god Allah blocked their chances to find back to the religion. Compare this to "the lost sheep" or similar in the Bible (Luke 15/8-10, Matt. 18/12-14, Luke 15/11-31). Yahweh and Allah the same god? Impossible is a too weak word. In many ways NT and the Quran are not only different, but totally opposed - 180 degrees from each other.

354 63/9b: "If they (non-Muslims*) act thus (forget Allah*), the loss is their own". There is no loss whatsoever unless Allah exists and in addition is a god (and not f.x. a camouflaged something from dark forces).

355 65/1f: "- - - any who transgress the limits of Allah, does verily wrong his (own) soul". As the Quran is not from a god, the relevant question is: Are the limits from Allah? - from dark forces pretending to be a god? - or from humans, f.x. Muhammad?

356 67/20d: "In nothing but delusion are the Unbelievers". This may be true if: 1): Allah exists. 2): If he in addition is a major god (and not f.x. something from dark forces pretending to be a god). 3): If in addition the god(s) the non-Muslim believe in, do(es) not exist. Also see 67/9c above.

357 67/20e: "In nothing but delusion are the Unbelievers". If Allah does not exist, or if he is a figure from the dark forces pretending to be a god - or if he is a fiction from a human brain - this also is the case for Muslims - and an extra dark possibility surfaces if there in addition exist(s) one or more real gods Muslims are prohibited from searching for.

358 67/21e: “- - - flight (from the Truth)". ####But who are fleeing from the truth and the fact that much is wrong in the Quran? - and a god does not make mistakes. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) Also see 13/1g and 40/75 above.

359 67/27d: "- - - which ye (non-Muslims*) were calling for!" This refers to non-Muslims who were daring Muhammad to ask Allah punish them as proof for his existence and as proof for Muhammad's connection to him. Muhammad never was able to do neither this, nor to bring any other proof.

360 68/16a: "Soon We (Allah*) shall brand (the beast) on the snout". If Allah exists and in addition either is a strict god or something from dark forces camouflaged as a god - and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

######361 68/35+36: “Shall We (Allah*) treat the people of Faith like the People of Sin? What is the matter with you? How judge you?” Yes, “how judge ye” to believe non-Muslims can be of as good quality humans as Muslims? (But to be down-to-earth: These two verses tell something sinister about the Quran and thus about Muhammad and about Islam.) No comments necessary.

362 69/33a: "This was he (who was punished in Hell*) that would not believe in Allah Most High". The underlying meaning: People who do not believe in me, Muhammad, end in Hell.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

363 72/15b: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are (but) fuel for Hellfire". One of Muhammad’s many negative - often distaste or stronger inducing - characteristics of non-Muslims.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

364 74/40-42: “(They (good Muslims*) will be) in Gardens (of Delight): they will question each other, and (ask) of the Sinners: ‘What led you into Hell-Fire?’” There is not a longer distance between Paradise and Hell - communication is possible. This is not the only case of such communication in the Quran.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

365 76/31e: "- - - for them (non-Muslims*) He (Allah*) has prepared a grievous Penalty". This only is right if Allah exists, and if they in addition have had free will, so that they sinned from choice, not from being forced to by Allah's predestination - but punish he can do it even if he should happen to be from the dark forces, just cheating Muhammad by pretending to be a god.

366 77/17-18: "so shall We (Allah*) make later (generations) follow them (non-Muslims of the old*). Thus do We deal with men of sin". Allah cannot deal with anybody unless he exists. (But he can deal with people if he exists, even if he should happen to be a devil or something dressed up like a god - the question in that case is how he would deal with them.)

367 78/30c: "- - - no increase (in your good marks in Heaven*) shall We (Allah*) grant you (non-Muslims*) - - -". Allah can grant nothing, unless he exists and is something supernatural.

368 80/17a: "Woe to man! What made him reject Allah?" Perhaps simply the fact that most of them understood something was and is seriously wrong with the Quran.

369 80/17-19: “Woe to man! What hath made him reject Allah? (Used like this it is clear that the word “man” here means the human race/Adam*.) From what stuff hath He (Allah*) created him? From a sperm-drop He hath created him - - -.” But:

This is contradicted by 6/2, 7/12, 17/61, 32/7, 38/71, and 38/76 that tell man/Adam was made from clay, 15/26, 15/26, and 15/33 that tell man/Adam was made from sounding clay, 55/14 that tells man/Adam was made from ringing clay, 37/11 that tells man/Adam was made from sticky clay, 23/12, that tells man/Adam was made from essence of clay, 15/26, 15/28, and 15/33 that tell man/Adam was made from mud, 3/59, 22/5, 35/11, 40/67, that tell man/Adam was made from dust, 20/55 that tells man/Adam was made from earth, 96/2 that tells man/Adam was made from a clot of congealed blood, 21/30, 24/45, and 25/54 that tell man/Adam was made from water (NB! NB! Not in water, but from water!), 70/39 that tells man/Adam was made from “base material”, and not to mention the greatest contradiction in this case: 19/9 and 19/67 which both tell that man/Adam was created from nothing.

Even if here had been meant a man and not Adam, this is wrong. A person is not made from a sperm drop, but from one sperm cell + one egg cell. But Muhammad did not know about the egg cell and exactly what happened. He believed the sperm was seed which could start to grow when planted in a woman. Any god had known better.

(Also see verse 6/2b above.) (Strictly reckoned this contradicts 27 other verses. And actually here are minimum 27 contradictions.)

370 82/9a: "- - - ye (non-Muslims and perhaps bad Muslims*) do reject Right - - -" The intended meaning here is that Islam represents what is right - which only is correct if Islam - the Quran and Muhammad - told the full truth and only the truth. This is not the case.

371 84/6b: "Verily, thou (non-Muslim*) art ever toiling on towards thy Lord (Allah*), but thou (Muslim*) shalt meet Him (Allah*)". Only if the Quran is from a god, and this god is Allah that the Quran tells only the truth and the full truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

372 95/5: "- - - We (Allah*) abase him (non-Muslims*) to the lowest of the low (except the Muslims*)- - -". Non-Muslims are bad quality - stay away from them.

372 comments. Sub-total = 9497 + 372 = 9869.


>>> Go to  Next Chapter

>>> Go to  Previous Chapter

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".