Allah in the Quran, Chapter 81

 

Section X: ALLAH AND HUMANS

Chapter 81

ALLAH AND MUSLIMS IN THE QURAN

 

001 As you will understand, only Muslims are good people in the eyes of Allah - or Muhammad(?). Especially if they would go on raids or into wars for Muhammad (Allah?).

No comment except that normal moral codes say: "Do to others like you want others do to you".

002 (Well, one more point. It happens Muslims more or less frustrated ask: "Why do everybody hate us Muslims?!" For one thing it is not true even though the Quran and Hadiths and many an imam, mullah and others claim so - it even is very far from true. But some have come to take a distaste to Islam and Muslims. If you do not understand why, take a close look at Islam's extended moral code - non-Muslims are sub-humans, dishonesty/thieving/robbing/raping of female captives/slaves ok according to the Quran, do not cheat believers at least, al/Taqiyya/Kitman/Hilah, suppression, haughtiness in your religion ("do non-Muslims have half the value of Muslims?"), glorification of fighting, blood, terror, murder, etc. etc., compare it to normal moral codes in normal religions and cultures and see if you need to ask that question again. Even if you do not consciously are living according to this, it automatically will influence your way of thinking and reacting at least some.

###### Another - and serious - point is that to "explain" that the Quran means something different from what it really says, is to corrupt and/or falsify it.

Also: What is sure, is that no god ever made a holy book as full of wrong facts, other errors, contradictions, unclear language, etc. as the Quran. #### Besides: Which one of the 20-30 known versions accepted by Islam of the Quran, see 15/9c (and there were even more versions through the times) - if any - is in case the correct one?

Finally: Always when you read the Quran, Hadiths, and other Islamic books, you should remember that Muhammad accepted the use of and himself used dishonesty in many forms in words and deeds. Even if the names are younger, it was he who institutionalized dishonesty like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing), the use of deceit ("war is deceit" - and "everything" is war), betrayal (f.x. the peace delegation from Khaybar), and even the disuse of oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah could cheat, cheating is ok)), which also includes the disuse of words and promises, as they are weaker than oaths = when oaths can be disused, so can words and promises. On top of this it is very clear from the Quran and all other central Islamic books, that Muhammad also liked respect and power and women. Combine these lusts with his acceptance of and personal use of dishonesty - even the gravest kinds: How reliable are that kind of men normally? - and how true and reliable are their never proved claims and tales?

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

003 2/139f: "- - - that we (Muslims*) are sincere (in our faith) in Him (Allah*)". This is completely without any consequence as a proof for the religion - any strong believer in any religion is sincere in his faith, and it means nothing and proves nothing about the one and only essential question for a religion: Is the religion a real and true religion with a real god (or gods) behind it? Or is it a superstition? As there is no god behind the Quran - too much is wrong in the book for a god to be involved - it is very easy to believe Islam is not a real religion but a superstition. The fact that Allah in no way clearly has proved his existence, plus the knowledge of what kind of a person Muhammad really was, make this belief more or less a certainty. To use mathematics: Alone all the errors in the Quran makes it 100% sure the book is not from any god, and then there are the other points in addition. The fact that the Quran is not from any god + again the fact that the Quran is full of wrong facts and other errors + the fact that Muhammad accepted and used dishonesty + the fact that Muhammad lied sometimes even in the Quran (some 70-80 places in our list, but there are more) prove practically 100% that Allah - if he exists - is not correctly described in the Quran. The additional fact that he in addition has been totally unable to prove even his existence, makes it practically sure Allah does not exist. AND PERHAPS THE MOST CENTRAL CONCLUSION FROM ALL THIS: IT IS 100% SURE THAT THINGS ARE SERIOUSLY WRONG WITHIN THE CLAIMED RELIGION ISLAM.

004 2/143n: "And never would Allah make your (Muslims'*) faith of no effect". If Allah exists. If he is behind the Quran. And if the Quran in addition tells the full and only truth at this point. If not this is wrong. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

005 2/144a: "We (Allah*) see the turning of thy (Muslim's*) face (for guidance) to the heavens (plural and wrong*) - - -". As the Quran is not from Heaven, there is little help in looking that way if you live according to that book - too much is wrong in the Quran.

006 2/156b: "- - - and to Him (Allah*) is our return (at the Day of Doom*)". Another never documented claim - there are hundreds of them in the Quran. (Some undocumented claims could be ok - "he just tells how things are" might be the reaction, if he had at least proofs for some of what he told and in addition was a reliable person. But in the Quran absolutely nothing of the central claims is proved - - - and Muhammad was far from very reliable - al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing) deceit, betrayal, broken oaths even.)

007 2/190f: "- - - Allah loveth not transgressors". Does he then love Muslims with their partly immoral moral code, partly unjust and immoral laws, not to mention their bloody war and looting religion?

008 2/207c: "- - - Allah is full of kindness to (His) devotees". Is he? - if he exists? Life under Islam is a harsh, stagnant life for too many, especially mentally. But there is one exception: The ones who needs a religion to lean to - and beware that these are not only from the weak ones; science has found that the need for religion is in the genes of a minor percent of all humans - there is a longing, and finding a religion gives them a feeling of a fulfilled life. Science even has found one of the implicated gens, named VMAT2 (Ill. Vitenskap 1/2006, p. 70-71 (Norway)). The percentage is unclear, but we have seen numbers up to 10%. Mostly it does not matter what religion, as long as they do believe in it, which is one of the reasons why you meet people in any religion - included Islam - who are sure their religion is the one and only, and feel they live a perfect life in it.

Well, of course there is one more exception: Leaders who get power and sometimes riches - and women.

009 2/211c: "But if anyone, after Allah's favor has come to him, substitutes (something else), Allah is strict in punishment". If you enter Islam and then leave (substitutes Allah with another god), the punishment is strict - if Allah exists and behaves according to Muhammad's teaching. But Muslims do not leave the punishment to Allah - they punish in this world, and often severely. What then if Islam is a made up religion? - the real Muhammad was a man of doubtful morality wanting power, and such men have used religion as a platform of power many a time.

010 2/213k: “Allah by His Grace guided the believers (by means of the Quran*) - - -“. A book with that many mistakes and invalid proofs, etc. is no guidance.

011 2/223b: "And know that ye (Muslims*) are to meet Him (Allah*) (in the Hereafter) - - -". If he exists. If he is behind the Quran. And if the Quran tells the full and only truth here. And not least: If he is a major god after all.

012 2/233h: "But fear Allah and know that Allah sees well what ye do". This is the last resort; "You know that may be you can cheat us, but there is a god working together with us, and him you cannot cheat. Be good and obedient - and go to war - and he will reward you. Be disobedient or cheat, and he will punish you." This is a carrot and a stick - or a whip - which costs nothing for a leader, but which is efficient if the underlings believe in it - the ultimate means of total control and dictatorship. True or not does not matter - what counts is what the underlings believe.

But one impertinent question: If Allah knows everything and even predestines everything according to his own unchangeable Plan like the Quran frequently states, why - why - does he then need to test his followers, f.x. by sending them to war for Muhammad to may be become invalids or be killed? - if he knows everything, he cannot learn anything from testing them. There is no logic in it. And this even more so if Allah as said on top of all really predestines everything you do.

But if this was Muhammad who needed the carrot and the whip, the logic appears.

This kind of whip (and carrot) is much used by Muhammad in the Quran.

###013 2/244a: “Then fight in the cause of Allah - - -". An order not possible to misunderstand - from the good idol Muhammad leading the claimed "religion of peace".

014 2/246f: "- - - fight in the cause of Allah". Even though this is (pretended to be) said to the Jews, it is one of the points behind the laws for war in the sharia laws, and behind even modern time glorification of war in Islam.

015 2/257a: "Allah is the Protector of those who have faith - - -". Only if Allah exists, if he has sent down the Quran, and if the Quran in addition tells the full and only truth about this.

016 2/268d: "Allah promiseth you (Muslims*) - - -". Invalid if he does not exist - - - and remember that his claimed book, the Quran, is not from any god - too much is wrong.

017 2/277f: "- - - on them (good Muslims*) shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve (in the possible next life*)". If Allah exists. If he is a god. If he is behind the stories in the Quran. And if the Quran in addition retells the stories 100 correctly.

018 2/286h: "Thou (Allah*) art our (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Only if Allah exists and in addition is a major god.

##019 3/76g: "- - - Allah loveth those who act right". How can he in case love the ones who live according to the Quran? - a number of its moral rules are so obviously wrong. The "constitution" for all moral rules is: "Do onto others like you want others do onto you". Compare this to the Islamic (im)moral code - and even a number of its laws, not to mention its rules for behavior in war - and weep. The only ones not able to see the horror in it, are Muslims who have been taught that this is "lawful and good" and "our glorious rights and duties" from they were babies. Read modern religious Islamic literature meant for Muslims, and you still find these medieval and pre-medieval ways of thinking and this upside down moral - or immoral - code. This at the same time as they declare that Islam is the "religion of peace". They should mention that Islam also is the culture and mentality of pre-medieval 630 AD and the "Religion of al-Taqiyya" (the lawful lie) - - - and in reality "the religion of war and suppression"..

020 3/103c: "- - - Allah's favor on you (Muslims*) - - -". This only is correct if Allah exists and in addition has done the favors. If not there are other explanations - remember that Muhammad had a strong tendency to credit his god with anything good - see f.x. 11/7a below.

021 3/104f: "- - - they (good Muslims*) are the ones to attain felicity". Strongly contradicted by the Bible - and by most other religions. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

022 3/115c: "- - - Allah knoweth well those who do right". See 2/233h above and 35/38b below.

##023 3/157a: “And if ye are slain, or die, in the way of Allah - - -". But is it really in the way of Allah, when the Quran is not from any god, included Allah?

024 4/26a: "Allah doth wish to make clear to you - - -". Allah or the maker of the Quran? (No god was involved in the making of the Quran - far too much is wrong).

025 4/26c: "Allah doth wish to make clear to you (by means of the Quran*) - - -". No book so full of mistakes and unclear points makes much clear to anybody.

026 4/28: "Allah doth wish to lighten your (difficulties)". By giving you a religion of dishonesty, war, hate, apartheid, and inferior women and slaves?

027 4/31a: "If ye (Muslims*) (but) eschew the most heinous of the things which ye are forbidden to do, We (Allah*), shall expel out of you all the evil in you, and admit you to a Gate of great honor". In plain words: If you do not do big sins, the small sins will be forgiven you, and you will end in Paradise - an easy religion - - - if it is not a made up one (remember that the Quran is not from any god - too much is wrong).

As for Allah forgiving: Also see 2/187d and 67/9c above.

028 4/77h: "- - - never will ye (Muslims*) be dealt with (by Allah*) unjustly in the very least!" If Allah exists, if he is a major god, and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about him. But also see 4/77h just below.

029 4/81c: "- - - put thy (Muslims'*) trust in Allah - - -". A bit risky if he does not exist.

#030 4/95g: “Unto all (in Faith (= all Muslims*)) hath Allah promised good: but those who strive hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by special reward -.” Are any comments necessary? - except f.x. compare this to NT. The Quran is war and murder. Compare it to the pacifistic and anti-war NT or f.x. Buddhism!

What a nice verse for a terrorist!

But what if the Quran is a made up book? - by man or dark forces? (with all its mistakes, etc. it is not from any god). Where will Muslims end if there is a next life?

031 4/95+96a: “- - - those who strive hath Allah distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward – Ranks specially bestowed by Him (Allah*), and Forgiveness (for anything if you are killed in battle*) and Mercy.” No doubt who is the best Muslim and what is the best deed in Islam – the warrior and the war are most pleasing to Allah. (To call Islam “The religion of peace” is an insult to the intelligence of everybody who has read the surahs from Medina with an open mind.)

As for forgiveness see 4/43h and 4/64g - and 2/187d - above.

But remember as for punishment and rewards - and forgiving: They cannot be given unless there are made changes in the Plan of Allah, which several verses in the Quran states nobody and nothing can make. (A predestined reward is not a reward, but theater.)

032 4/100a: “He who forsakes his home in the cause of Allah - - - should he die as a refugee from home for Allah and his Messenger, his reward becomes due and sure with Allah - - -”. Even if you do not die in battle, just die in war - f.x. from illness or accident - or if he has had to flee from persecution, it seems like you go directly to Paradise. (Perhaps this also goes for refugees). War for Allah really is valuable for Muslims - - - if the Quran tells the truth. A fact(?) any terrorist "knows" - most of them are Muslims.

But as so much is wrong in the Quran that the book definitely is not from any god, no reward from Allah is sure.

033 4/125a: "Who can do better in religion than one who submits his whole self to Allah - - -". Anybody if Allah does not exist - and there are at least 3 very good indications for that he is fiction: 1) Muhammad was never able to prove anything. 2) Allah has never in 1400 years given the slightest clear indication for his existence. 3) And the Quran is not from a god - no god would ever be connected to a book of that quality.

And what if Allah exists, but is from the dark forces, like several points in the religion, the moral code, and the laws may indicate?

034 4/128d: "- - - Allah is well acquainted with all ye (Muslims*) do". See 2/233h above and 35/38b below. Though in just this case it may be meant as a "carrot" for a peaceful settlement.

035 4/141b: “And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers”. Go to war – in the long run you are sure to win. The development seemed to justify this verse for Muslims for 110 years - they lost battles, but hardly ever a war, at least not as they stormed westwards. Not until they lost the war in France against Carl Martell (battle of Tours in 732 AD). That made an impression - at least for some - and for a time made some doubt the infallibility of the Quran. The same effect - and stronger - one got over the losses against the west during the 1800s and early 1900. Allah - why did he not let Muslims win?

But the verse is meant as pep talk. And an efficient pep talk it really is. Most active Muslims expect to win total power on Earth sooner or later in accordance with Allah’s/Muhammad’s word.

Will it be like living in Saudi Arabia, Algeria, North Pakistan, Libya, Ethiopia, or Iran? Or Afghanistan? Or like in the Islamic State" - IS - in Iraq/Syria "anno" 2014?

036 4/141c: "And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers". Wrong. This has happened many, many times.

037 4/162l: "- - - to them (Muslims*) shall We (Allah*) soon give a great reward". Only possible if Allah exists and is a god.

038 4/173c: "- - - He (Allah*) will give (the good Muslims*) their (due) rewards - - -". If he exists. If he is behind what is told in the Quran. And if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

But remember as for punishments and rewards - and forgiving: They cannot be given unless there are made changes in the Plan of Allah, which several verses in the Quran states nobody and nothing can make. (A predestined reward is not a reward, but theater.)

039 4/175b: "- - - soon He (Allah*) will admit them (good Muslims*) to (Paradise*) - - -". If he existed. If he is a god. If he is behind the texts in the Quran. And if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

040 5/6f: "Allah doth not want to place you in difficulty - - -". Perhaps not on after all minor points like cleanliness, but he demanded that you fought, suffered hardship, was crippled (never mentioned in the Quran) and died. You may call that difficulties, too.

041 5/7b: "- - - His Covenant, which He (Allah') ratified with you (Muslims*), when ye said: 'We hear and we obey'- - -". Once upon a time some Boers in South Africa made what they called a covenant with Yahweh/God. They promised that if Yahweh/God would help them, they would do so-and-so. What they over-looked was that a covenant must be agreed on by at least two parts; and as Yahweh/God was not an involved participant in an agreement about the case, they in reality only made promises, not a covenant. Is this something of the same? Another point: According to the Bible the god did not make any covenant with Ishmael and his descendants, only with Isaac and his line (1.Mos. 17/21). This even more so as in spite of Arabs' claims of being descendants of Ishmael, it is unlikely they are so. For one thing and for what it is worth the Bible tells that Ishmael's descendants settled not in Arabia, but in vest Sinai "near the border of Egypt" (1. Mos. 25/18) where they became 12 tribes with "twelve tribal rulers" (1. Mos. 25/16) = the god's promise of making Ishmael's descendants mighty. But easier and more solidly proved: Modern DNA analyses have showed that the Arabs not are and never were a pure "race". The original Arabs seems to have been people from here and there who settled in the desert something like 4ooo - 5ooo years or later ago (earlier along the coast), partly because the introduction of tamed camels around that time made life in the desert a real possibility (NB: The camel did not come into wide use until around 1ooo - 900 BC modern science has found, and not introduced further north until around 800 BC, when the Assyrians stated trade with Arabia). And this mixed group has been even much more mixed up through the times, partly by traders and others passing through on the caravan "highways" crossing Arabia and leaving off-springs now and then - remember that before Islam, "the two delightful things" in Arabia were sex and alcohol - and also Arab traders bringing home brides from abroad. But perhaps the biggest source for foreign blood to further mix up and dilute the claimed race, was import of slaves from all around, both long before Muhammad and far more later. All the girl and women slaves were definitely not imported just for decoration, and the "pure Arab blood" never was much more than an illusion - originally started by Ishmael or not. (And in addition: Even if Ishmael had settled in Arabia, there also lived many others - so even if this had been true, only a small percent - less than 0.01 percent (= if there at that time lived only 10ooo in all Arabia) - of the Arab DNA could have been from Ishmael already at that time, and it would have been far more diluted by now.)

There is no rational or scientific reason for believing in the claim that the Arabs are descendants of Ishmael and Abraham - on the contrary: What knowledge which exists, makes the claim highly unlikely, and even if there should be a connection, it in case is an extremely diluted one.

042 5/8f: "- - - fear Allah. For Allah is well acquainted with all that ye do". The carrot and the stick: Be good and be obedient and Allah will like you, be bad or disobedient and Allah will punish you. Efficient if the religion is a true one. Efficient for Muhammad and later leaders for keeping the people in line also if Islam is a made up religion. You meet similar sentences many places in the Quran.

043 5/11d: "And on Allah let the Believers put (all) their trust". A bit risky if Allah is a made up god - and remember here that a book of a quality like the Quran is not from a god. It is slander, insult and heresy to blame a god - not to mention an omniscient one - for such work.

##044 5/35b: “Do your duty to Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which means you should do your duty - and ask for help and forgiving - to/from Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

Also: The Quran and all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god. This means that it is extremely unlikely Allah exists - this even more so as Allah nowhere except for in Muhammad's mouth has manifested himself, and that he thus just is a made up mental picture and a mental idol. Is it possible to have a duty to a made up mental idol?

045 5/35f: “- - - strive with might and main (see 5/35a-b just above*) in His (Allah’s*) cause: that you may prosper.” Fight for Allah (and Muhammad) – then you may get a prosperous life. The alternative - death - was glorious. The alternative war cripple is never - not once - mentioned in the Quran. Only the "two glorious fates": Rich from stealing/loot or dead and in Paradise. 20-30-40 years as a cripple dependant on others or as a beggar because you were too much hurt to work - may be in pain - such alternatives are never mentioned. The same for what about your children and your family if you are crippled or killed.

"The Religion of Peace"! - or "The Religion of Honesty"?.

046 5/56f: "- - - the Fellowship of Allah that must certainly triumph". Pep-talk. Besides at least that Muslims "must certainly" triumph is wrong.

047 5/81c: "- - - believed in Allah, in the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -".A variant of Muhammad's main mantra to glue himself to his god and his platform of power.

##048 5/84b: “What cause can we have not to believe in Allah and the truth (the Quran*) which has come to us - - -?” F.x. because it hardly is the truth - see among others 13/1g and 40/75 below. In addition - to answer the question: There are heavy reasons for not believing in Allah or in the Quran: The fact that the Quran - the basis of the religion - contains so many mistaken facts in a book which claims to be sent down from their god. Then how many mistakes are there in the religious points? Is it really sent down from a god, or is it made up by someone here on Earth? And if it is sent down: In that case Allah very clearly is not omniscient - and not benevolent. Or it may be sent from other - darker - forces. Another fact is that Allah is claimed to be a good and benevolent god, whereas the Quran shows he in reality - if he exists - is an unfair god of war liking inhumanities and blood and accepting dishonesty (skip the glorifying big words, and see the realities they hide - or try to hide). Etc.

####And not least: It is difficult to believe in the claimed truth of a religion founder and a religion believing in and practicing dishonesty - al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), etc., deception (practiced by Muhammad himself), broken words/oaths (practices and advised by Muhammad) - how much is true and how much is not in such a religion and in the arguments of its followers?

049 5/92a: "Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". The mantra of Muhammad, here in a strong form - and a form very practical for a warlord (surah 5 is from 632 AD and he is not just a robber baron any more, but a warlord.) Obey Muhammad!

For a comparison: Jesus said: "Follow me", which is a long way from "Obey me".

050 5/92e: "- - - it is Our (Allah's*) Messenger's (Muhammad's*) - - -". With a message (the Quran) that full of mistakes, contradictions, etc., that message - and hence the messenger - is not from any omniscient god.

051 5/105d: "(If you follow the Quran), no hurt can come to you from those who stray". But what about from the Quran if there somewhere is a real god - a god Muslims have been prohibited from looking for?

052 6/36g: "- - - then they (Muslims*) will be turned unto Him". As they hardly will be turned unto Yahweh if they live according to the partly immoral moral code of the Quran, this may be true. The big question in case is that as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is from no god, will he be existing for them to turn to? - or will Allah perhaps exist and is he in case correctly described among all the errors in the Quran - or is he something different from what is described? - f.x. from the dark forces?

##053 6/41b: “Nay - On Him (Allah*) would ye (people*) call (if you were in distress*), and if it be His (Allah’s*) will, He would remove (the distress) - - -”. But why call on Allah, when it is of no use? Allah according to the Quran follows his own predestined Plan which nobody and nothing can change - still according to the Quran. Thus if it is in his Plan that your distress will be removed, it will disappear no matter. Whereas if it is Allah's Plan that it shall go on, it will go on no matter what you say or do or plead. If the Quran tells the truth about Allah and his planning, there thus simply is no use praying to Allah - it will change nothing.

Or is this one more place in Islam where Muhammad wanted both good sides of incompatible good things, which are impossible to combine - like predestination making battles and wars safe, but free will for man (impossible to combine even for a god) giving Allah reason for punishing sinners, included the ones not obeying Muhammad when he wanted a raid or a war? Here: Allah's unchangeable plans, vs. pray to Allah when you want a change in your future = a change in his plans (if it did not happen that it was his Plan to give you a better future, and in that case it was not the prayer which had any effect). And similar with f.x. forgiving.

If Allah is following his unchangeable Plan like the Quran claims, there is no use praying to Allah - things will go according to his predestined Plan no matter ("if it be His will") - - - if the Quran tells the truth. Advising people to pray to Allah in case just is a bluff.

054 6/47b: "Think ye (people*), if the punishment of Allah comes to you - - - will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?" Remember this in the cases in the Quran where Muhammad explains that the reason why Allah did not punish non-Muslims, was that he would not risk hurting Muslims at the same time (an "explanation" which in case shows that Allah is not omnipotent - any omnipotent god is able to punish only the ones he wants punished, even when they are parts of a crowd).

055 6/61b: "He (Allah*) is - - - (watching) from above over His servants (Muslims*)- - -." Allah looks after you. But also remember: Allah sees what you do, so remember your discipline; be good and obedient! - and obedience on Earth in reality meant - and means - to Muhammad and his successors."

056 6/61c: "- - - He (Allah*) sets guardians over you." Here is a contradiction. Guardians mean angels, and other places in the Quran makes it clear it is more than one who looks after you at the same time - and all the time. But f.x. 6/8 says: "If We did send down an angel, the matter would be settled at once, and no respite would be granted them" = your life would come to an end or it would be the Day of Doom according to Islam. 6/61 says guardians (= angels, plural) take care of you. And for that case it is several places in the Quran said that the angel Gabriel is sent down to Muhammad. And Abraham, Lot, Mary, inhabitants in Sodom and Gomorrah saw angels. But 6/8 says no angel can be sent down because then everything will be over. A clear contradiction.

057 6/62c: "- - - Allah, their (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Only if he exists, is a god, and is correctly described in the Quran.

058 6/64a: "It is Allah that delivereth you from these and all (other) distresses - - -". A claim - but only a claim. Like normal the Quran never proves anything - is unable to prove anything. Is it strange that Muhammad idolized and preached blind belief for his followers? But not proved claims in reality are so weak that "any not proved claim can be dismissed without a proof" - another way of saying that the duty of proof rests on the one who claims something. It is not the duty of the opponent to disprove it.

059 6/70e: "- - - there is no protector or intercessor except Allah - - -". Contradictions:

  1. The Quran tells that some ones can be intercessors if Allah permits it.
  2. It also is made clear that Muhammad has got the right to be intercessor even on the Last Day.
  3. And then there is the question about f.x. Yahweh.

060 6/81d: "Which of (us) two parties (Arabs/Muslims vs. non-Muslims*) hath more right - - -". That is more of a question than most Muslims like to believe.

061 6/105c: "- - - We (Allah*) may make the matter clear to those who know". Those who know are completely aware of that it is not possible to make things clear by means of a book full of mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, etc. And some of them are too intelligent to be moved by cheap flattery.

####062 6/108d: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”.

Comment A6/92 (A6/93 in the 2008 English edition): “Lit., ‘thus godly have we made…', etc. implying that it is in the nature of man to regard the belief which have been implanted in him from babyhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones – whit the result that a polemic against those beliefs often tends to provoke a hostile psychological reaction.” This is said as an explanation why Islam sometimes meets a negative reaction. But the book skips the fact that this also goes for Muslims: If they are strongly indoctrinated, they may react strongly to arguments and facts they do not like – and without thinking over – or being mentally able to think over – even true facts. This is likely to be the explanation for why most Muslims are able to be blind to all the mistakes and for the many proofs for that things are very wrong in the Quran, and thus with Muhammad and in Islam.

A harsh and hard reality: Think this over, and you see that the quoted sentence reveals MUCH about Islam and Muslims.

#########063 6/108e: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”. This sentence should be extremely thought-provoking also to Muslims. All the mistakes, etc., in the Quran proves 100% and more that the book is not from any god. And large parts of the religion and its moral code may - may - indicate that dark forces are involved (whereas all the wrong knowledge one believed was correct science in Arabia at that time + all the tales "borrowed" from Muhammad's surroundings strongly indicates that the Quran is made by one or more humans in Arabia at the time of Muhammad - with Muhammad as the prime suspect.)

Also see 8/48a below.

###064 6/109i: “- - - what will make you (Muslims) realize that (even) if (special) Signs came, they (non-Muslims*) will not believe?” Wrong. If there were real proofs of a god - miracles - at least a good number of people would believe - that is a psychological fact (look f.x. at the Pharaoh’s magicians and at the results of Jesus' miracles). The sentence really is fast-talking to “explain” away why Allah/Muhammad was unable to produce real proofs for Allah. Worse: An intelligent man like Muhammad knew this argument is a lie - and all the same he used it frequently. This simply is one of the places in the Quran where Muhammad knew he was lying.

065 6/122b: "Can he who was dead, to whom We (Allah*) gave life - - - be like him who is in the depth of darkness - - -?" Alternative explanation: Can a man who has become a Muslim be compared to something as lowly as a non-Muslim? Of course not. (But what if the Quran is a made up book? - it at least is from no god with all those mistaken facts, etc.)

066 6/132b: "- - - thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah) is not mindful of anything that they (good Muslims*) do". Allah knows everything you do, and reacts accordingly. Why, if he has predestined everything and humans just are "puppets on strings"? And there also is the problem of 2/233h above.

067 6/152e: "- - - thus doth He (Allah*) command you - - -". As the Quran is not from a god, the relevant question is: Allah or someone (f.x. Muhammad)/something (f.x. the dark forces) else?

068 6/153e: "- - - thus doth He (Allah*) command you, that you may be righteous". Is it righteous ("just and good") to steal or rob in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to enslave in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to extort in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to attack peaceful people in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to rape captive or slave women in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to rape captive or slave children in the name of Allah? - is it righteous to punish a raped woman because she cannot produce 4 men - men - who have seen the very act, to prove it was a rape? (one of the most disgusting and unjust laws in this complete world)! - is it righteous ("just and good") to lie, or cheat or break your word or your oath (al-Taqiyya, Kitman, "break your oath if that gives a better result" (Muhammad))? - is it righteous ("just and good") to murder opponents because they do not agree with you or your likely made up religion? - is it righteous ("just and good") to kill persons because they do not believe in Islam or wants to leave it - a religion based on a book full of mistakes, contradictions, wrong logic, etc., dictated by a man believing in al-Taqiyya, in Kitman, and in breaking his words and his oats even - is it "lawful and good" or even "just and good"? The horrible truth is that many Muslims will answer "yes" to some or all of these questions. These rules of moral and justice - or rather immoral and injustice - have been so strongly imprinted on them since they were babies, that they are unable to see the horror and the places of inhuman injustice in their code of so-called moral - and moral philosophy which could have mended the terrible cultural rules does not exist in Islam - and the as disgusting injustice in some of their laws. They really believe those are the best of rules, and that everybody not living by them are second rate "Untermench" (sub-humans) - In parts of Pakistan imams/mullahs have debated if non-Muslims have half the value or less compared to Muslims. No Comments. But also see 6/108d above and 23/24b (A23/11) and 26/74c below.

But even if many Muslims honestly believe the Quran's moral code is just and righteous - because they are too used to it to be able to see immoral, injustice and often horror it accepts or even advocates - this claim in the Quran is wrong, and sometimes horribly wrong.

069 6/165a: "It is He (Allah*) who hath made you (Muslims*) (His) agents - - -". One more never proved claim. And one which among other things depends on if he really exists, if he really is a central god - or a god at all - and on if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about this. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

070 7/3d: "- - - follow not, as friends or protectors, others than Him (Allah*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which says you should follow Yahweh.

071 7/32b: "They (the good things*) are - - - purely for them (Muslims*) on the Day of Judgment". If Allah exists, if he is a central god - and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

072 7/32c: "They (the good things*) are - - - purely for them (Muslims*) on the Day of Judgment". Strongly contradicted by the Bible, which states that the good things - Paradise - are for believers in Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

073 7/35e Verse 7/35 is a little complicated written - the Quran often is not very clear. In plain words: When prophets for Allah come to your community, good Muslims will benefit. (Whether it is true or not is another question.)

074 7/42d: "- - - Companions of the Garden - - -". = They will end in Paradise. Also remember that the big differences between the Bible's Paradise and the one of the Quran, are one of the strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

075 7/50c: "- - - Companions of the Garden - - -". = The ones who ended in Paradise. Also remember that the big and fundamental differences between the Bible's Paradise and the one of the Quran, are one of the strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

076 7/53g: "- - - the things they (non-Muslims*) have invented will leave them in the lurch". Will this also be the case for Muslims if the Quran is a made up book and Allah an invented god? - remember no god made a book of a quality like the Quran.

077 7/56f: "- - - the Mercy of Allah is (always) near to those who do good". Does this include the Muslims living also in accordance with the immoral parts of the Quran's moral code?

078 7/74a: "- - - He (Allah*) made you inheritors - - -". Yet another not proved claim.

079 7/74c: "- - - the benefits (ye (Muslims*) have received) from Allah - - -". There is not documented one single case of benefit clearly given by Allah in the entire history of Islam - a number of claims, but only claims based on air or belief, and nothing provably from him. The best proof: If there had existed clear cases, Islam had told about the proofs often and in big words. There are no such words.

080 7/89g: "In Allah is our (Muslims*) trust". Rather risky as most likely he is a nonexistent, made up god - at least there is no god behind the only claims for his existence, the Quran (too much is wrong in that book for any god to have been involved in it).

081 7/102a: “Most of them (people*) We (Allah*) found not men (true) to their covenant - - -“. “The Message of the Quran” (A7/81 - A7/83 in 2008 English edition) tells (in the Swedish edition) that the exact word-for-word translation is: “We found by them nothing that tied them to what is truth and right”. And that book continues by telling that this may include #####man’s capability to instinctively(!!!*) to see the difference between right and wrong.

Now the fact that some of the most fundamental moral questions get the same answer in many societies, indicates that something deep inside man tells some common moral truths (though to call it this a "capability to instinctively to see what is truth and right" is deeply wrong - this and similar claims from Islam solely is dictated from the deep lack of proofs for anything at all of the central points in the religion): You shall not steal, you shall not be a nuisance – or worse – to others, you shall not rape, you shall not kill, etc. But Islam and the Quran is the best proof for that these inner messages are easy to override for a charismatic leader and for a society, and make immoral behavior praiseworthy and a moral code: To steal/rob, rape, enslave, murder, and more – it all is “good and lawful” if you just observe the right formalities in Islam. To what claimed covenant are they true?

Besides: Is there really a clear covenant between Allah and the Muslims, or have Muhammad and his followers just made promises and believe it is a covenant? - and if there is a covenant: What is it worth if Allah is a made up god? - not to mention if he is from the dark forces?

082 7/170c: "- - - never shall We (the god*) suffer the reward of the righteous (here; among Jews and Christians?*) to perish". In clear language: Also the righteous among Jews and Christians will go to Heaven - - - if not the god changed his mind and abrogated (made invalid) this verse later (this was in 621 - before Islam was changed to a harsh war religion). But see 7/169a and 7/170a above.

083 7/173: "Our fathers before us may have taken false gods, but we are (their) descendants after them: wilt Thou (Allah*) then destroy us because of the deeds of men who were futile?" As the Quran with all its mistakes, contradictions, etc. is not from a god, this may be relevant for the Muslims - f.x. on the possible Day of Doom.

084 8/9d: "- - - He (Allah*) answered you - - -". In the entire history and prehistory there is not one single proved case of an answer - or anything else - from Allah. Guess if Muslims had bashed you in the head with it, if there had been even one single proved case!!

085 8/48a: "Remember Satan made their (sinful) acts seem alluring to them - - -". A number of acts accepted or advocated or even ordered in the Quran are from sinful to extremely sinful in all other of the large religions - and nearly all of the small ones - and also conflicting human rights and against all normal moral laws and rules. Not to mention the it conflict with the very basis of all inter human moral: "Do onto others like you want others do onto you". The Quran is not made by any god, not to mention a good or benevolent god - too many errors, etc. and too horrible moral - or immoral - code. If the Quran is made by dark forces or even by one or more selfish humans, it is not strange if Satan has made the Muslims' sinful acts just and alluring to them. May thus Muslims be included here?

Also see 6/108d and 6/108e above.

086 8/60e: “Whatever (money, time or your life*) ye shall spend in the Cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly”. Resources counts – for you to go to Paradise, for Muhammad (and Allah) to be able to make war. And warriors like you count – for you to gain loot or be sure to go to Paradise, for Muhammad (and Allah? – an omnipotent god really should not need war and mass murder and inhumanities? – especially not a good god), to be able to make war and gain riches for f.x. “oiling” (bribes), and power and followers for his religion and platform of power.)

087 9/13f: "- - - it is Allah Whom ye (Muslims*) should more justly fear - - -". If he exist and if he is something powerful. (If he is from the dark forces, there is a real reason to fear him.)

088 9/19j: "- - - Allah guides not those who do wrong". Something to think about the next time you do something which is lawful according to sharia, but obviously wrong? - like punishing a raped woman, to take a clear example. - or treating other human beings - male or female - in ways you would dislike to be treated yourself. Or anything conflicting with "do to others like you want others to do to you".

*089 9/21a: “Their (terrorists/warriors*) Lord (Allah*) doth give them glad tidings of a Mercy (that terrorists/warriors for Allah are forgiven practically any sin, especially if they are killed*) from Himself (from Allah personally*), of His good pleasure (from the fighting and murdering they have done for the good and kind and benevolent god*), and the Gardens for them, wherein are delights (earth-like riches, luxury and women*) that endures”. The ultimate pep talk for war, terror and murder? In the name of a presumably peaceful religion and a kind and good and benevolent god?

As for forgiving from Allah: Also see 2/187d and 67/9c above.

###090 9/39a: “Unless ye (Muslims*) go forth (in war/battle for Islam/Muhammad*), He (Allah*) will punish you with a grievous penalty (normally in the Quran a synonym for Hell*) - - -”. An order not possible to misunderstand for a pious - or fanatic - Muslim.

Yes, a religion built on peace, goodness and heavenly ethics.

THIS IS THE ORDER ALSO TODAY - JUST LISTEN TO SOME IMAMS, ETC. - see 9/38d.

THIS VERSE TELLS HORRIBLY MUCH ABOUT ISLAM AS IT IS TAUGHT IN THE QURAN.

One of the really strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - not to mention that Jesus and Muhammad were not in the same religion.

091 9/44e: “And Allah knoweth well those (the Muslims going to war for Allah/Muhammad*) who do their duty”. It is not possible to deny - like most Muslims and many politically correct other ones try to do today - that war (against “unbelievers”) is a duty for Muslims. It is impossible to say it more directly than the Quran does here. And also that Allah knows the ones who goes to war - and the ones who do not. Ominous for the ones who do not. Also see 2/233h above. "The Religion of Peace"?

092 9/49c: “(Many say*) ‘Grant me exception (from going to war*) and draw me not into trial’. Have they not fallen into trial already?” The Muslims not wanting war are already judged and doomed.

BUT THERE IS AN EXTRA POINT HERE: MUSLIMS SHOULD NOT BE JUDGED BAD JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE MUSLIMS - WITH A PARTLY HORRIBLE MORAL CODE, ETC. - THE MAJORITY IS JUST AS HUMAN AS NON-MUSLIMS, f.x. not wanting wars.

093 9/59i: "- - - to Allah do we turn our (Muslims') hopes!" It has never to our knowledge been showed that such hopes have been fulfilled to a larger degree than what other causes than a god may explain.

##094 9/85b: “Allah’s plan is to punish them (the ones not wanting to go to war*) with these things in this world, and that their souls may perish in their (very) denial of Allah”. Refusing war means:

  1. Social contempt.
  2. To most likely end in Hell.
  3. To deny Allah.

Is it possible to put more social and religious pressure on a man to make him go to war - willing or not? Anyone saying Islam is peaceful, either has not read the Quran, is repeating “correct” words but wrong meanings, or is a Muslim (who believes it or not believes it).

095 9/99a: "- - - some of the desert Arabs (nomads*) believe in Allah and the Last Day, and look on their payments (tax/zakat*) as pious gifts bringing them nearer to Allah - - -. Aye, and indeed they (and perhaps Muhammad's prayers*) bring them nearer (to Him (Allah*))". No comments except: A nice reward - - - if Allah exists and is a god (quite a surprise to some Muslims if he turns out to be someone from the dark forces, who sometimes dressed up like the angel Gabriel to meet Muhammad - a possibility which the f.x. immoral parts of the Quran's moral code may point to.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are taught that a question or problem which really can have only one valid solutions, can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. F.x. in cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. Islam teaches differently. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1): Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. Islam is teaching differently. 2): The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other. Islam is teaching differently.)

Another fact: Today it is easy by means of statistical methods to check if prayers have any effect. (Let f.x. 1ooo persons each pray for one among 1ooo unknown persons sick or in other ways in need. compare the result after some time with a similar group of 1ooo who has not been prayed for, and see if there is a difference. If there is a positive difference, this would be a strong indication or perhaps even a proof for something - a proof Islam strongly and dearly needs, as they have not any proof for even a single of its central claims. But it has not even tried to make such a test. Why?)

096 9/109d: "And Allah guideth not people that do wrong". What consequence does this have for Muslims, as the Quran partly advices deeds obviously wrong and immoral (f.x. punish a raped woman if she has no 4 male witnesses. And also permits to steal/rob, rape, suppress, kill, etc.). "People who do wrong" also is one of Muhammad’s many negative names for non-Muslims.

Compare "do to others like you want others do to you" to the Quran's moral code. Who are often doing wrong/bad things?"

097 9/111a: “Allah hath purchased of the Believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the Garden (of Paradise): they fight in His (Allah’s) Cause, and slay and are slain (and go to Paradise afterwards*) - - -.” It may be a good, if de-humanizing (war mostly is) deal - - - if Allah and the Paradise exists. If not the only person gaining anything was Muhammad (and all the mistakes, etc. in the Quran proves absolutely that at least something is seriously wrong).

098 9/111d: “- - - they (warriors/terrorists*) fight in His (Allah’s (or Muhammad’s?*)) cause, and slay and are slain: (and get great reward in Paradise*)”. Can anyone really read the Quran - even a Muslim - and afterwards believe the Quran represents a good, peaceful, benevolent god? One is reminded of the blood orgies of the Mayas and Incas, except that Islam mostly kills at the spot - like the Assyrians. And "the Religion of Peace"?? Wrong.

099 9/112a: "Those who turn (to Allah); that serve Him, and praise Him, that wander in devotion to the Cause of Allah; that bow down and prostrate themselves in prayer; that enjoins good and forbid evil, and observe the limit set by Allah - (these do rejoice)". Only if Allah exists and is a god (not f.x. something from the dark forces like parts of the Quran may indicate - or not simply is a fiction from one or more human brains, sick or not sick).

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are taught that a question or problem which really can have only one valid solutions, can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. F.x. in cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. Islam teaches differently. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1): Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. Islam is teaching differently. 2): The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other. Islam is teaching differently.)

Another fact: Today it is easy by means of statistical methods to check if prayers have any effect. (Let f.x. 1ooo persons each pray for one among 1ooo unknown persons sick or in other ways in need. compare the result after some time with a similar group of 1ooo who has not been prayed for, and see if there is a difference. If there is a positive difference, this would be a strong indication or perhaps even a proof for something - a proof Islam strongly and dearly needs, as they have not any proof for even a single of its central claims. But it has not even tried to make such a test. Why?)

100 9/116f: "Except for Him (Allah*) ye have no protector nor helper". Wrong according to the Quran - the book tells that angels may be protectors, that Muslims are the protectors of each other (and non-Muslims of each others), and that Muhammad even may protect, or at least intercede for, the ones he wants, even at the Day of Doom - one of the reasons for being friendly and obedient to him?

101 9/117a: "Allah turned with favor to - - -". in the entire history there is not one proved case of Allah showing any favor to anybody - not even to Muhammad (f.x. many a leader has built his power from scratch - some by means of religion, some by other platforms of power).

102 9/120e: “It was not fitting for (them - see 9/120a just above*) to refuse to follow Allah’s Messenger, nor to prefer their own lives to his - - -”. Incitement to war. What does just this tell about Islam? What it does tell about Muhammad and Islam is that the Quran is - not a fairy tale, but a demon tale?

And: Make Muhammad a powerful warlord! Hitler said similar things (actually some intellectuals compared Nazism to Islam before WW2.)

103 9/123d: "- - - know that Allah is with those who fear him". If he exists. If he is a god. And if the Quran has described him correctly.

104 9/129a: "Allah sufficeht me (a Muslim*) - - -". This only can - can - be true if he exists.

#105 10/9b: “Those who believe, and work righteousness (included fighting in wars, stealing, raping, and killing*) – their Lord (Allah*) will guide them because of their Faith: beneath them will flow rivers in Gardens of bliss.” The paradise of a primitive warrior from the hot desert - most boring in the long run to say the least of it. Has an omniscient, omnipotent god nothing better to offer? A curiosum: According to Hadiths 2 of "our" rivers - the Nile and the Euphrates - start in Heaven/Paradise.

106 10/12a: "When trouble toucheth a man, he crieth (prays loudly*) unto Us (Allah*) - - -. But when We (Allah*) have solved his trouble - - -". How is it possible to explain that Allah "solves trouble" because of prayers, when the Quran many places makes it 100% clear that Allah has predestine every detail of what happens on Earth according to his Plan long time before, and that nothing and no-one, and thus no prayer from anyone, can change anything in that Plan?

107 10/14a: "Then We (Allah*) made you heirs in the land after them - - -". In and around Arabia there were remains from earlier habitations - plus old tales and legends about earlier tribes and people. Muhammad claimed they all had been exterminated for sins by Allah - if Yahweh could be hard sometimes in OT, he was an amateur compared to Allah - and that his time's Arab were their inheritors - by the grace of Allah.

108 10/23c: "- - - We (Allah*) shall show you (human*) the truth of all that ye did". Only possible if Allah exists and is a god, none of which is proved - there only exist claims and fast-talk for it.

109 10/36a: "But most of them (non-Muslims*) follow nothing but fancy." This is true if none of the other religions is a true religion. It also is true for Muslims if the Quran is a made up book - a fancy - - - and it at least is not from a god with that many mistakes, contradictions, etc. It is wrong if the Quran is not from a god, and there somewhere else is a true religion. There f.x. are indications for that Yahweh is not fantasy - if the old books tell the truth.

110 10/62b: "- - - on the friends of Allah there is no fear - - -". The old truth: If Allah exists and is a major god.

111 10/103c: "- - - thus it is fitting on Our (Allah's*) part that We should deliver those who believe!" Yes, it is very fitting - especially if all Muslims have been led by the nose by a deceiver. But the old fact: The claim only is possible if Allah exists and in addition is a god of some standing (and not f.x. from the dark forces like among other things his partly immoral moral code, his dishonesty, his lust for and inhuman rules for war and blood, and his partly unjust laws may indicate).

112 10/105a: "- - - (the*) Religion with true piety - - -". Islam only has true piety if the Quran is from a god, and even then only for good Muslims.

113 10/106b: "- - - such (other gods than Allah*) will neither profit thee (humans*) nor hurt thee - - -". But as the Quran is not from a god - too many mistakes, etc. - the question is: Does this also go for Allah - if he exists? If he is made up, he is just a pagan god.

114 11/34d: "He (Allah*) is your (people's*) Lord". Only if he exists and is a real god and a top god.

115 11/123d: "- - - put thy (human/Muslim*) thrust in Him - - -". Risky if he does not exist. Risky if he exists, but belongs to the dark forces. (If he made the Quran, he is no god - too much is wrong).

116 12/56c: "- - - We (Allah*) suffer not to be lost, the reward of those who do good". If he exists and is a major god. And if the Quran has described him correctly.

117 12/90f: "- - - never will Allah suffer the reward to be lost, of those who do right". If he exists and is a major god. And if the Quran has described him correctly. (But the Quran with all its mistakes, etc., and with Muhammad's lust for power is very unreliable.)

Besides Allah can reward nobody unless his Plan is changed at that point - something nobody and nothing can do, according to several statements in the Quran.

118 13/18a: "For those who respond to their lord (Allah*) are (all) good things". Ever so often claimed in the Quran, but never proved.

119 13/36b: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (the Quran?*) - - -”. If it here is meant the Quran, the infernal question: Is a book with that many mistakes sent down by a god? No - simply out of the question.

120 14/4c: “- - - Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases, and guides whom he pleases - - -.” Not the same god who was behind NT. See f.x. "the lost sheep".

121 14/18a: The same parable should be usable for the Muslims, as the Quran is from no god - no god delivers that quality.

122 14/34a: "And He (Allah*) giveth you (Muslims*) of all that ye ask for". A questionable claim - we have met a lot of dissatisfied Muslims.

####123 15/46: "(Their (the righteous'*) greeting will be): 'Enter ye here (Paradise*) in Peace and security". This is all very nice - but who are the really righteous ones? Remember here that real morality and ethics do not build on Muhammad's selfish, self centered, and primitive war related "moral" code, but on something like "Do unto others like you want others do unto you", and here the Quran falls through on all too many points.

124 16/2f: "- - - do your (Muslims'*) duty onto Me (Allah*)". Duties which by coincidence (?) mostly happened to be in accordance with Muhammad's wishes and ideas. And the foremost duty for a Muslim was - and according to the Quran still is - to go to war. This even though nearly all Muhammad's and his successor's armed "incidents" were raids, etc. of aggression to steal/rob, take prisoners and little by little to force Islam on others by the sword or by other means backed by the sword.

125 16/23e: ""- - - verily He (Allah*) loveth not the arrogant". Muslims sometimes are pretty arrogant, perhaps especially those from among the Arab ones.

126 16/41d: "(Good Muslims*) We (Allah*) will assuredly give a goodly home in this world; but truly the reward in the Hereafter will be greater". This is a pep-talk to Muhammad's followers in a difficult time. This surah is from 622 AD, shortly before Muhammad had to flee the town - good words are cheap, but often helps the spirit. Some of it even became true, as a number of his followers later gained riches and power from stealing/robbing, extortion, and enslaving.

127 16/52d: "- - - to Him (Allah*) is duty due always - - -". Only if he exists and is a god.

128 16/63d: "- - - but Satan made, (to the wicked), their own acts seem alluring - - -". But how could this happen, when the Quran so clearly states that Allah decides - even predestines and according to his unchangeable Plan - everything? Remember that free will for man is one of the things not possible even for an omnipotent god if there is full predestination - not even limited free will. (This is one more claim which is wrong in the Quran). See 14/22b above.

129 16/81j: "- - - that ye (Muslims*) may bow to His Will (in Islam)". What for? - there is nowhere any proof for his deeds, his superiority, or even for his very existence.

##130 16/90h: "He (Allah*) instructs you (Muslims*) - - -". Is it Allah or someone else who instructs? The instructions are via Muhammad and his Quran, and Muhammad did not hide that he did use dishonesty - even the breaking of words/oaths (2/225a, 5/89a+b, 16/91e, 16/92a+b) - and there are facts like lies in the Quran (6/7a, 6/28c, 6/35b, 7/120a, 7/146b, 20/70a), and words like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), and "war is deceit". (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) The question is even more relevant as the Quran is of such a quality, that no god was ever involved in the making or delivery of it, not to mention revered it in his own "home" as the "Mother of Books" (13/39b, 43/4b+b, 85/21-22), but that one theory for the Quran's creation is that it is made by dark forces - perhaps by Allah if he belongs to those forces and just cheated Muhammad.

131 16/91g: "- - - indeed ye (Muslims*) have made Allah your surety - - -". What is this worth if he does not exist and in addition is a god? - not to mention: What is it worth if he exists and belongs to the dark forces?

132 16/97a: "Whoever works righteousness - - - and have Faith, verily, to him (what about her?*) will We (Allah*) give a new Life (= Paradise*) - - -". If Allah exists and is a major god, and if the rest of the Quran is true.

It definitely is no proved verity/truth.

###133 16/106a: "Anyone who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief (= doubt or wish to leave Islam*) - - - on them is Wrath from Allah - - -". It is prohibited not only to leave Islam (though many do so nowadays), but even to doubt the teachings - full of mistaken facts or not. Here it is indicated that the punishment is for Allah - remember this is in 622 AD and Muhammad still is weak - it changed later. But you bet this verse counts for the ones who wish to "help" Allah with the punishment.

134 17/18a: "If any do wish for transitory things (of this life), We (Allah*) readily grant them - - -". This simply is not true. There are millions of people living in poverty wishing a little more for the daily life, without getting it. And there are millions more not quite as poor longing for a little luxury, and gets nothing. And even millions more who do need this or that - and getting nothing. (And remember this verse also talks about non-Muslims*).

135 17/19b: "- - - they (good Muslims*) are the ones whose striving is acceptable (to Allah)". If Allah exists. And if he has sent down the Quran. And if the Quran tells only the plain and full truth.

136 17/19c: "- - - they (the good Muslims*) are the ones whose striving is acceptable (to Allah)". But if now Allah does not exist - and too much indicates that (f.x. the fact that the Quran is from no god) - will then a religion built on Muhammad's war ideology, ethical and moral codes, etc., make them acceptable for a good god if there all the same is a next life? - f.x. Yahweh?

137 17/23c: “Thy Lord (Allah*) hath decreed that ye worship none but Him, and that ye be kind to parents.” This last part actually is strongly contradicted by 6/151 which prohibits you from being kind to your parents. (We honestly think the words in 6/151 represent an accident during f.x. the Uthman’s edition of the book. But it is a clear and strong contradiction - and how many more "accidents" are there in the Quran?).

  1. 6/151: This is a really strange contradiction: “Come, I (Muhammad*) will rehearse what Allah hath (really) prohibited you from – - (to*) - - be good to your parents - - -.” Read it once more: You are prohibited from being good to your parents!! – the opposite of what is said everywhere else in the book and contradicts it strongly. The Muslim sources we have found, all agree on that this is wrong – and actually we agree with them – this is so far out of the Quran’s style, that it must have been an accident and wrong. (It also in the same verse is prohibited "not to kill your children" if you are poor - also an obvious mistake and contradiction of the rest of the Quran).

    But this means that here you have a (actually 2) clear mistake(s) in the Quran – certified by Islam as a mistake – to serve for free to any Muslim or non-Muslim claiming that the book is perfect and without mistakes “to the last comma”. Just ask them if they have ever red 6/151? (And ask if they are aware of that the comma did not exist in Arab when the Quran was written around 650 AD).

    And: When this is wrong – how much more is wrong in the book?

    It may have meaning, though, if the Quran here had been talking about "infidel" parents, but the book here is not doing so - and actually Muhammad said you should be kind to your parents even if they were non-Muslims. But we include:

  2. 9/23: “Take not for protectors your fathers and your brothers if they love infidelity above Faith (= if they are not Muslims).
  3. 58/22: “Thou wilt not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, loving those who resist Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their fathers or their sons - - -.” (You find similar rules in extreme sects even today. The rationale behind such rules, is to cut as many as possible of sources of balanced or correcting information, to hinder that the one-sided propaganda from the sect is contradicted and nullified by facts.)

These are ugly verses. But as it is possible to be superficially kind to your parents (only superficially, as the main thing that counts for many parents – the love from their children – is gone), even if you are prohibited from loving them, this is a borderline case. We include it partly because it is so ugly and inhuman and tells so much about extreme sects and religions like Islam, and partly because it in reality is nearly impossible to be really kind to them if you are ordered to keep them away from you as humans.)

138 17/45a: "When thou (Muslims*) dost recite the Quran, We (Allah*) put - - -". Back to the old fact: Allah can do nothing unless he exists - and if he exists, but belong to the dark forces, be a bit careful with what you permit him to do. As mentioned before: He at least is no god if he is behind the Quran - too much is wrong in that book.

####139 18/2b: “(He (Allah*) hath made it) Straight (and Clear) - - -". #####This is one of the verses you like we said should remember each time a Muslim tries to explain away a clear mistake by "no, this is not literally meant - - -", which is one of the 3 most used last ditch defenses (the two others are: "You cannot understand a text in the Quran alone - you have to see the whole Surah (or the whole Quran)". And: "You cannot really understand the Quran unless you read it in Arab". Both of which are rubbish. (Well, there are 3 more: "You do not know the Quran/what you are talking about", and: "You just are an Israel lover/Muslim hater quoting what you have heard or read". And the strong one in all religions: "I know better than you about this - even if the proofs show I am wrong". ####(Science has shown that it is typical for religious persons in all religions to believe not because their religion is proved, but to be able to believe in spite of all proofs showing that things are wrong. Such proofs are just dismissed, simply because they do not want to believe them - Muslims are very typical here.)) There are places where you have to know more than the actual verse and the nearest few ones to understand the meaning, but mostly the simple answer is: "If you are not able to see the essence in a meaning or something said, you should stay out of debates" - this Muslim claim simply is a means to make the opponent unsure, because few know the Quran well enough to see that mostly this claim is invalid. And as for reading in Arab to understand it: For one thing the Arab of Muhammad mainly was the language of primitive desert nomads even though it later is linguistically polished - there is no problems for rich modern languages like f.x. English to compete with it in vocabulary. (Also in Japan they had the same haughty self-centered meaning once upon a time: Primitive foreigners impossibly would be able to express what a highly refined language like their could. They stopped claiming it after many enough had learnt foreign languages, to see the nonsense in it. And that really was a refined cultural language, not something from primitive tribes, even though polished afterward. Well, there always will be some words which are special for a language, and which need explanation, but that is it - and this goes for any language and is nothing special for Arab.) The remaining fact is that what one brain can think and express, another brain of the same quality and similar education can understand, at least with a little explanation. But the claim is difficult to leave for Muslims, because they need it as an "explanation" when they lack real arguments.

And not to forget: Scientists of language tell that Arab only is a medium difficult language to translate.

An ironic point here is that Islam and Muslims themselves frequently quotes words or expressions out of context, and make them sound very different from what they say in the texts - sometimes by added twisting. (F.x. Paul one place tells that humans are unreliable and perhaps also he is not able to tell the full truth always, and then he warns about this human weakness. Muslims twists it to that Paul admits NT are full of lies. One rule about honesty for others and one about dishonesty for themselves.)

140 18/17e: "- - - he whom Allah leaves to stray - for him wilt thou find no protector to lead him to the Right Way". If the Quran is 100% correct, this may be right - - - if Allah exists. It is wrong if another god exists. It is irrelevant if no god exists.

141 18/20: "- - - force you (claimed Muslims*) to return to their (Pagan*) cult - - -". But this should not be too terrible? - a Muslim forced to do such a thing, is not sinning (as he is forced to do so). Besides: If Allah is made up god - and he only exists in a book where no god was involved - they just were going from one pagan god to another. And if Allah is what the Quran claims, one is not sinning at all, because then it is Allah who has predestined it - and what Allah has predestined hardly is your sin? - remember that if it is true that Allah predestines everything, man has no free will (in spite of the Quran's and Islam's claims, even a bit of free will for man is impossible if Allah has full predestination and/or precognition).

142 18/30g: This verse is one of the many promising Paradise to good and obedient Muslims. It is valid if Allah exists, if the Quran is from him, and if the Quran is fully truthful concerning this point.

143 20/123b: "- - - whosoever follows My (Allah's*) Guidance, will not lose his way, nor fall in misery". As the Quran is not Allah's guidance (if he exists) (as no god would ever be involved in a book with a miserable quality like the Quran (with the possible exception of the polished language)), this does not concern the Quran.

144 20/123d: "- - - whosoever follows My (Allah's*) Guidance, will not lose his way, nor fall into misery". This is strongly contradicted by the Bible - incompatible really. F.x. some of the moral codes are so different that if a Muslim lives according to them, and then meets Yahweh at "the other side", he will not only get a ticket to Hell, but be placed on the fast track for it. Look f.x. at the fundamental basis for all inter-human morality: "Do unto others like you want others do unto you". The Quran and its war and suppressing religion and ideology and accepted dishonesty does not live up to that by far, on all too many points.

As Allah's(?) guidance includes dishonesty in words and deeds, suppression, slave taking, extortion, war, etc. this sentence influences Islam's moral code in those directions.

145 21/112d: “(Allah*) is the One Whose assistance should be sought against blasphemies.” Well, that was in 621 (?) AD. After 622 AD the sword was handier – blasphemy soon carried a death penalty - - - and there came a number of contradicting texts. This verse is contradicted and often “killed”/abrogated by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

146 22/1a: "O Mankind! Fear your Lord (Allah*)!" Muhammad claimed Allah was the god of the entire world. At present he is the nominal god - existing or not existing - for roughly 20% of the world's population (the actual number is very uncertain, but some 1.2 billion). But the number is increasing, partly because of active proselyting (and at the same time hinder or forbid proselyting for other religions or even for telling facts about the Quran or Muhammad in their own countries), and partly because Muslims produce many children - even in modern times when it has become clear that the production of food and other necessities are reaching limits (unless science makes new breakthroughs, but no such ones are expected shortly). One opposing tendency, though, is that 3. generation emigrants into other cultures seems to a degree to lose faith - but this possible tendency is not 100% proved yet.

147 22/36f: "- - - that ye (Muslims/people*) may be grateful". There is no reason to be grateful unless it really is Allah who has done it - there only are lose claims and lose words for that this is the case. See f.x. 11/7a above.

148 22/38b: "Verily, Allah will defend (from ill) those who believe - - -". An easy claim, but never in the entire history and prehistory one documented case. Lots of claims, by not one proved case. Words are cheap, deeds are more reliable.

149 22/40h: "Allah will certainly aid those who aid His (cause) - - -". in the entire history and prehistory there exists not one proved sample of Allah aiding anyone. There are lots of claims and even belief, but not one proved case. Just like you find in f.x. most of the Pagan religions.

####150 22/46d: "Truly it is not their eyes that are blind (as they do not believe in the Quran and in Muhammad*) - - -". What the Quran forgets(?) to mention, is that Muslims are victims for just the same human dilutions like others: A blind heart and a blind brain are blinder than a blind eye or a deaf ear. This is the only possible reason why they do not see all the many big and small errors, etc. in the Quran - they are unable to or unwilling to see, or are unable to face the terrifying fact that something is horribly wrong with one of the basic elements they have built their lives on.

151 22/48a: "And how many populations did I (Allah*) give respite, which were given to wrongdoings?" A theme often returned to in the Quran: Why some non-Muslims live a good life - and many Muslims not: It is Allah's decision - but be soothed; he will punish them in the end.

##152 22/58c: "Those who leave their home in the cause of Allah, and are then slain or die - on them will Allah bestow, verily, a goodly Provision (Paradise*) - - -". Except for real martyrs (the Quran calls everything martyrs, included aggressive warriors, terrorists, and whatever) guess if here is a difference between Yahweh and Allah, between Jesus and Muhammad! Not the same god and not the same kind of representatives on Earth by far - and Jesus and Muhammad definitely not in the same religion.

153 22/58d: "- - - on them (Muslims killed for Muhammad*) will Allah bestow, verily, a goodly provision - - -". If he exists, if he is a major war god, and if the Quran has told the truth and only the truth about this.

154 22/71d: "- - - things for which no authority has been sent down to them, and of which they have (really) no knowledge - - -". As the Quran is not from a god - no god makes such and so many mistakes, contradictions, cases of invalid logic, etc. - what is then the authority behind the Quran and Islam? This even more so as all the believed knowledge only rests on a book full of mistakes, dictated by a man of very doubtful morality, and nothing more - except the never proved belief of the forefathers who believed in that book.

155 22/78c: "He has chosen you (Muhammad/Muslims*) - - -". The old fact: Allah could choose no-one unless he existed (but of course he could even if he belonged to the dark forces, if he existed).

156 22/78f: “It is He (Allah*) Who has named you Muslims, both before and in this (Revelation) - - -“. Wrong. The name was never used before Muhammad – there is no kind of trace of it (or of the religion) anywhere. This is one of the cases where Islam will have to prove their claim.

157 24/38b: "- - - Allah may reward them (good Muslims*) according to the best of their deeds - - -". Everything also depends on if Allah exists and if he in case has supernatural power (and preferably not dark power). But how can Allah reward without making changes in his predestined Plan? - a plan nobody and nothing can change according to several points in the Quran.

158 24/48a: "When they (Muslims*) are summoned to come to Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". In reality always to Muhammad. But by connecting the two names, the summon became much stronger.

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran. Power was the main thing Muhammad sought - and riches to gain more power. The Quran clearly indicates that power - and respect - meant even more for him than women. And he was eager for (young) women - willing ones and not willing ones - and at least one child.

159 24/51a: "The answer of the Believers, when summoned to Allah and His Messenger (= always to Muhammad in praxis*) - - - is no other than this: they say, 'We hear and we obey'". Muhammad demanded absolute power over his followers. (Strongly contradicting his claims saying he demanded nothing from them.)

This verse tells very much about Islam, and especially so as the Quran itself by means of all its mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, etc. proves it is not from a god. Is the Quran just a powerful tool for a ruthless dictator? - or perhaps for dark forces? Also see 24/51b just below.

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran. Power was the main thing Muhammad sought - and riches to gain more power. The Quran clearly indicates that power - and respect - meant even more for him than women. And he was eager for (young) women willing ones and not willing ones and at least one child.

###160 24/51b: "The answer of the Believers, when summoned to Allah and His Messenger (= always to Muhammad in reality*) - - - is no other than this: they say, 'We hear and we obey'" = "der Fürer denkt für uns". This represents a mentality that does not only chill your spine, but makes it freeze. It took Europe and the West 300 years, long and hard mental and cultural strife, and several wars, included 2 world wars to get rid of this mentality. We do not need to have it introduced once more. And especially not on behalf of the leaders of a religion where central parts are seriously wrong. Also see 24/51a just above.

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran.

161 24/52a: "It is such who obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - - that will win (in the end)". See 24/51a and 24/51b above. The serious point is that there is a reasonable chance that they will succeed - because of ruthlessness, dishonesty, terror, strong discipline, perseverance, etc.

162 24/52b: "It is such who obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - - that will win (in the end)". Win what? The world? Paradise? Everything? There is a possibility for everything, as it is a war religion - but Paradise is excepted because no god is behind the Quran and all its mistakes, and thus not behind Islam.

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran.

#######Also note how different this is from Jesus' "Follow me". One of the proofs for that Jesus and Muhammad were not in the same religion or line of prophets.

163 24/54a: "Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger (Muhammad - in real life always Muhammad*) - - -". See 24/48b and also see 24/51a and 24/51b above. A strengthened version of Muhammad’s standard mantra for gluing himself to his god and thus to his platform of power.

164 24/55g: "- - - the one (religion*) He (Allah*) has chosen for them (Muslims*) - - -". As no god has been involved in the making of the Quran - so much is wrong in that book that it is heresy and slander even to accuse a god of haven taken part in a work of such a quality, not to mention claiming that he reveres it as or like a "mother book" (13/39, 43/4, 85/21-22) in his own "home"/Heaven - also no god has chosen the Quran as a basis for their religion. And as no god has chosen the Quran/Islam, this also includes Allah - if he exists. (And who then made the choice?) #####Also beware that in principle - and many places even today - it is not permitted for Muslims to choose a religion themselves - - - unless they choose or "choose" Islam.

165 24/62a: "Only those are Believers, who believe in Allah and his Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". It is not enough to believe in Allah - the claimed god. One also must believe in one specific of his many, many claimed messengers - Muhammad. Here is something strange - if Muhammad is not divine, the religion should be complete without one of its very many claimed prophets. What is wrong here? - or is Allah incomplete without Muhammad, one of his 124ooo (= 620 at any time for 5ooo years or 12-15 for 160-200ooo years if they on average worked for 25 years. No traces from them found. Believe it if you can.) claimed prophets?

166 24/63f: "- - - Allah doth know those of you who slip away (from Muhammad's orders*) under shelter of some excuse - - -". Do not try to cheat Muhammad - the god sees you if you do not really and in servility obey him.

167 24/64h: "- - - Allah doth know all things". = do not try to cheat. But another point: Why does a god who knows all things, have to test his followers? - Muhammad's main explanation for why Muslims have to go to war and for why they experience setbacks. Also see 2/233h above.

#168 25/42d: "- - - who is most mislead in the Path!" As the Quran with all its errors is from no god, this is a very open question. But there is a chance that "the narrow road" of Jesus is real. If all religions are made up - which is not unlikely as no gods show their existence - the war and suppression religion Islam is one of the most inhuman ones, whereas Christianity like it is described in NT (do not protest until you have read the NT) and Buddhism likely are the most human ones, at least of the big religions, and thus alternatives for the ones needing or unable to give in the "higher spheres". Islam is the only of the big religions which itself (in the Quran) really proves things are seriously wrong with the religion, as all the wrong facts, contradictions, other mistakes, etc. in a book pretended made/sent down by a god, prove it is from no god.

169 26/89a: "But only he (will prosper) that brings to Allah a sound heart - - -". Correct only if Allah exists, if Allah sent down the Quran, and if the Quran tells the full and only truth. Wrong if not.

170 28/50f: "For Allah guides not people given to wrongdoing." One may ask who - if anyone - then guided the Muslims the next centuries? - you find much wrongdoing and worse in Islamic history during that period. Cfr. "do to others like you want others do to you".

171 28/61c: "- - - one to whom We (Allah*) have made a goodly promise (Muslim*) - - -". But for one thing it has never been documented that Allah ever gave a promise - there only is the word of a man with a doubtful morality and reliability - even according to central Islamic literature - for it. And for another thing there never was documented that Allah ever kept a promise. Yes, not even his existence is in any way documented - there only are Muhammad’s claims. (This is a main reason why Islam can accept nothing negative about Muhammad - true or not. He was in many ways a doubtful person, but he is all they have to build on - if his true nature should be highlighted, Islam might collapse.)

172 28/83a: "That Home of the Hereafter We (Allah*) shall give to those who intend not high-handedness nor mischief on earth - - -". The behavior of Muslim warriors, assassins, terrorists and others through the times - is that mischief? If not: What kind of religion and what kind of god is this? And if it mischief: What then about Muslim warriors, assassins, terrorists and others through the times, in the possible next life?

173 28/83e: "- - - the End is (best) for the righteous". If Allah exists and is a god. And if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth. And if the righteous are the ones living according to the Quran, not according to "do to others like you want others do to you" + believing in an existing god (if one exists).

174 29/7e: "- - - We (Allah*) shall reward them (good Muslims in the possible next life*) according to their best deeds (and the best deed for Muslims, is war or raids for Allah and Muhammad and his successors*)". This only is true if Allah exists and is a major god, and if the Quran in addition has told the full truth and only the truth on relevant points - and if he can reward/punish without changing his own unchangeable predestined Plan. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

175 29/11a: "And Allah most certainly knows those who believe, and as certainly those who are Hypocrites". See 2/233h above.

176 29/69g: "- - - Allah is with those who do right". One more never proved claim. Claims are cheap, proofs are reliable. (But who are doing right - the ones living according to the moral laws of the Quran, or the ones living according to "do to others like you want others do to you"? - the ones living according to a claimed holy book so full of errors that it itself strongly proves it is not from any god, or someone searching to find if there is a real god somewhere?

177 30/15e: "(In Paradise good Muslims*) shall be happy in a Mead of Delight". Only true if there is the god Allah, and his Paradise is correctly described in the Quran.

178 30/53a: "Nor canst thou (Muhammad*) lead the blind (the ones refusing to believe in Muhammad*) back from their straying (and to Islam*)". Non-Muslims = blind. But who is most blind; the one able to see, but who is accused of being blind, or the one refusing to see?

179 31/8c: "(For good Muslims*) there will be the Gardens of Bliss". If Allah exists and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about him. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

Also remember that the enormous differences between the Paradise of Yahweh and the one of Allah, are one of the really strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god. If they had been, their paradise had been one and the same.

180 31/8-9: "(For good Muslims*) there will be the Gardens of Bliss, to dwell therein". If Allah exists and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about him.

181 31/22a: "Whoever submits his whole self to Allah - - -", - runs a great risk, as long as Allah most likely does not exist. Even worse: The only claim for his existence is a story telling that a former pagan god is Allah, a story choke full of mistaken facts and other errors, and told by a man of very moderate moral standard and reliability.

182 31/33h: "- - - nor let the Chief Deceiver deceive you about Allah." But if the Quran is a made up book - and at least it cannot be from a god with that many mistakes - who but Muhammad is then one of the chief deceivers? (If he is not himself deceived by something or somebody - f.x. by a mental illness (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - like modern medical science suspects) or by the dark forces, like a number of points in the Quran may indicate).

183 31/33j: "- - - deceive - - - about Allah". Who is deceived - the blind believer or the one who sees that serious things are wrong in the Quran?

184 33/35f: "- - - for them (good Muslims*) has Allah prepared forgiveness - - -". Allah can forgive nobody unless he exists and is a god (well, may be also if he belongs to the dark forces, but it is questionable what value the forgiveness in case has).

As for forgiving from Allah: Also see 2/187d and 67/9c above.

185 33/35g: "- - - for them (good Muslims*) has Allah prepared - - - a great reward". If he exists and is a major god, and if he is like described in the Quran. Also see 10/9f above.

#####186 33/36a: "It is not fitting for a Believer (Muslim*) - - - when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision - - -". Full control - absolute power - no thinking, only obedience. The ultimate dream for any dictator. One extra point here is that in reality it was Muhammad who made the decisions here on Earth - not even Muhammad claimed he got all details dictated from Allah. And the final touch: No god dictated the Quran - too much mistakes, contradictions, etc. - then who in reality dictated here that one should obey among others - and the only one on Earth - Muhammad absolutely blindly?

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran. Power was the main thing Muhammad sought - and riches to gain more power. The Quran clearly indicates that power - and respect - meant even more for him than women. And he was eager for (young) women - willing ones and not willing ones - and at least one child.

187 33/36h: "- - - (if) anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." In plain words: If anyone here on Earth disobeys Muhammad, he will end in Hell. The ultimate dictatorship.

188 33/47c: "- - - they (good Muslims*) shall have from Allah a very great Bounty". You find similar claims here and there in the Quran, not one of them is documented or in other ways proved fulfilled. Many claims, but not one proved case.

###189 33/60e: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad or not Muslims*) - - -". To twist an old proverb: This sentence alone tells more than a 1000 choice slogans about "the religion of peace". What you say when you forget to guard your words or do not think it necessary, always by far is more reliable than carefully chosen claims. Also see next comment just below.

#####190 33/60f: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad or not Muslims*), then they will not be able to stay in it (the city*) as thy neighbor’s for any length of time". This tells as much as the comment just above. Something to remember when you accept Muslims to your city? There already are demands for special treatment for Muslims many places. But we remind you that most - at least 70% on average according to research - are as ok as you and me, and most of the rest not too bad. But the problem is: Who is who?.

#191 35/15a: "O ye men! It is ye that have need of Allah - - -". Only if Allah exists and is a major god. That is to say, there are humans (5-10%?) who like or need something strong to lean to, but they only need the belief. They are helped if they just believe strongly enough in a god/gods. It does not mean anything which one or ones, as long as they believe it is reality. Because of this human trait, you find such persons in any and all religions - 100% sure that they are right and with the right god(s). Partly because of the strong religious social and judicial pressure in Islam, you find a lot of them in that religion, as such pressure combined with one-sided information makes it easier for such tendencies to manifest themselves.

192 35/24g: “Verily We (Allah*) have sent thee (Muhammad*) in truth as a bearer of Glad Tidings and as a warner - - -.” (See 35/24f just above.) This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

It definitely is no proved verity/truth.

###193 35/24j: “- - - and there never was a people, without a warner (a prophet for Allah*) having lived among them (in the past) - - -”. As said before: Neither in archaeology, nor in anthropology, nor in architecture, nor in art, nor in history, nor in literature, nor in folklore, nor in folk tales - not even in fairy tales - do we find a single trace of any teaching of monotheism before 610 AD, with two well known exceptions (Jews and Christians) and two or three less known exceptions (Pharaoh Akn-Aton, praying to the sun, a semi-Christian sect in Persia, an Arab sect around 600 AD - likely inspired by the two monotheistic religions in the area – plus the Zoroastrians after a fashion). Some places one or a few gods dominated, but no monotheism.

  1. In the Americas - absolutely nothing.
  2. In Australia - absolutely nothing.
  3. In the Pacific - absolutely nothing.
  4. In Europe - absolutely nothing except Christians and some Jews.
  5. In Africa - absolutely nothing with the exception of one single man: Pharaoh Akn-Aton - but he so definitely was not speaking about Allah. He wanted the sun for the only god. (+ Jews and Christians).
  6. In Asia - absolutely nothing, except in what we now call the Middle East: The Christians, the well known Jews and as already mentioned the Zoroastrians mainly in Persia (after a fashion) and a couple of monotheistic old sects. Of course there was Buddha, but he was/is no god, and besides he accepted that gods existed, but told they were on wrong ways not leading to nirvana - no monotheism.

124ooo (= 620 at any time for 5ooo years or 12-15 for 160-200ooo years. No traces from them found. Believe it if you can.) or more - the number is said to be symbolic, as there may have been more - prophets had to have left some traces somewhere, if the tale was true.

This statement simply is not true. If Islam still insists, they will have to produce strong proofs. “Strong statements demands strong evidence”, to quote science. And not just lose claims, invalid “signs” and “proofs”, and more lose statements like Islam normally produces - real proofs are needed.

194 35/30a: "For He (Allah*) will pay them (Muslims*) their meed - - -". See 35/29e just above.

195 36/54c: "- - - ye shall be repaid the meeds of your past Deeds". Even though the goodwill of the god and also his forgiveness is essential also in Islam, it is less essential and the balance between your god and bad deeds more essential to your acceptance to Paradise, than the same in especially NT, where the goodness of the god and his forgiveness is more central than in the Quran - and consequently your deeds less central.

As for forgiving from Allah: Also see 2/187d and 67/9c above.

196 37/110a: "Thus indeed do We reward those who do right". How? - by not forcing him (Abraham) to sacrifice his son? Practically nobody throughout history has done so, so where is the reward compared to practically everybody else?

197 39/10j: "Those who patiently persevere will truly receive a reward without measure!" Yes, if Allah exists, if he is a major god, and if the Quran in addition has told the full truth and only the truth about him.

With a Quran clearly from no god - too much is wrong - this at least is not "truly".

198 39/18g: "- - - those (Muslims*) are the ones endued with understanding". If the Quran is from a god, the understanding - the religion - is correct. If it is not from a god, the understanding is wrong - and no god ever made a book that full of mistaken facts, contradictions, etc. etc. NB: Also see 13/3j.

199 39/34b: "They (good Muslims*) shall have (in Paradise*) all that they wish for, in the presence of their Lord (Allah*) - - -". But only if Allah exists, is a major god, and only if the Quran is reliable at least on this point.

p>200 39/73c: "Enter ye (Muslims*) here (in Paradise*), to dwell therein". If Allah exists and is a major god, and if the Quran has told 100% the truth and only the truth for once. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) Also see 10/9f above.

201 40/4a: “None can dispute about the Signs of Allah but the Unbelievers”. This may be absolutely correct, though the correct expression may be "are permitted to" not "can":

  1. It is a reason for social extrication in Muslim societies to doubt any word in the Quran.
  2. It is a reason for imprisonment in some Muslim countries to doubt too much or deny belief in the Quran. (March 2008: A woman in Malaysia, Kamariah Ali, was just (2007? AD) sentenced to 2 years of prison for being inconsistent with Islam. The judge, Mohammad Abdullah, told she had committed a grave offence, and that the sentence was in the public interest.)
  3. It is a good reason in some countries and in some societies for being murdered by Muslims if you express too much doubt in the Quran, not to mention in Muhammad - the weak link in the religion (the only claimed witness and not a very holy character).
  4. It still is a reason for death penalty - official or unofficial - in some Muslim areas to doubt too much in the Quran, not to mention to want to leave Islam.
  5. The marriage is automatically void and ended the moment a Muslim leaves Islam - and not everyone wants to lose his wife or her husband or the mother or father of their children (not to mention lose their children).
  6. Even for non-Muslims it is dangerous to doubt the signs and the Quran - they may be murdered. Islam do not trust the power of the word - with a reason, thinking about all the mistakes and invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”, etc. in the Quran - and resort to murder. It is better to believe in the never proved religion of the fathers, than to try to find out if it really is true. Like Islam says when “hunting” for proselytes: It is difficult to question your (heathen*) deepest beliefs and what you were imprinted as a child". They forget that this also goes for Muslims: Better not to control if what you believe in is right or wrong - and to run the risk of not finding the right religion (if one exists) in time, if Islam is wrong.

Yes, many places only non-Muslims can - or actually are permitted to - discuss or dispute the signs of Islam. And even for us it is so dangerous, that this book cannot be printed unless the printer is very brave, in spite of the book being very down-to-earth and based entirely on the Quran and other central Islamic literature + correct scientific knowledge.

202 40/35e: "- - - Grievous and odious (is such conduct) in the sight of - - - the Believers". Obviously - but because they are right or because they - in other cases - are blind and in addition unable to or refuse to think?

203 40/44b: "- - - Allah (ever) watches over His Servants". The old warning: Do not try anything. The old promise: Everything good will be remembered, too. If Allah exists and is a god.

204 41/8a: "For those who believe and work deeds of righteousness are a reward that will never fail". True only if Allah exists, if he in addition is a major god, and if the Quran in addition has made no mistakes when describing him.

205 41/40h: “Which is better? - he that is cast into the Fire, or he that comes safe through - - -”. But as the Quran is not from any god - Allah or whoever - who is who?

206 41/52c: "Who is more astray than one who is in a schism far (from any purpose (here Islam*))?" The answer depends on two things: Does Allah exist - and is he in case a major god. And on: Do other gods - f.x. Yahweh exist?

Besides: Who is most astray - the one strongly believing in a book bull of errors, or the one able to ask questions about the mistakes and worse?

207 42/8i: "- - - the wrongdoers will have no protector or helper". See 42/8g just above. In addition there is this big gap between who is a wrongdoer in the war religion Islam, and in the NT. A wrongdoer in Islam, simply may be a god or even very good person in a normal religion - - - and then he may qualify for f.x. Yahweh's Paradise.

208 42/27d: "- - - He (Allah*) is with his Servants (see just above*) Well-Acquainted - - -". The old warning: Be bad and get punishment, be good and get reward. But if it is true that Allah knows everything: WHY THEN DOES HE HAVE TO TEST THEM - F.X. BY SENDING THEM ON RAIDS FOR RICHES AND CAPTIVES/SLAVES - LIKE THE QURAN TELLS TIME AND TIME AGAIN?!

209 43/35a: "- - - the Hereafter, in the sight of thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*), is for the Righteous (good Muslims*)". Often claimed in the Quran, but not one proof - only lofty words and claims built on nothing.

210 45/30b: “- - - those who believed and did righteous deeds, their Lord (Allah*) will admit them to His Mercy - - -.” Plain and simple. (And of course the best deed was and is to go to war.) But it is totally dependent on that Allah exists, is a god, and is correctly described in the Quran.

211 46/13d: "- - - on them (Muslims*) shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve (in the possible next life*)". Correct if Allah exists, is a major god and is correctly descried in the Quran. Wrong if not.

212 47/2g: "- - - He (Allah*) will remove from them (Muslims*) their ills and improve their condition". This is on par with much which is said in the Quran, but which has never been proved Allah did. Many Muslims got better economical conditions from stealing, robbing, extortion, and enslaving, but that was not Allah, but their own ill deeds - - - and neither Islam nor Muslims ever mention what price other humans had to pay for this, in the form of ruin, of ruined lives, of deaths, of pain and sorrow. They only see their own big heroes - they lack the necessary moral, and even the moral code, telling that others had to pay a too high price for their own life in luxury, and they lack the backbone to see the dark side.

213 47/4a: “Therefore, (because Allah wants it!! - see 47/3*) when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks - - -.” A clear order.

##214 47/4b: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight (and remember the Muslims practically always were the aggressors – to gain riches and slaves and power - - - and some new proselytes*)), smite at their necks - - -.” Surah 47 is from 622 AD and Mecca, but some verses likely from Medina – and it is possible to see the change towards war already. It contradicts and abrogates a lot of peaceful verses. This verse contradicts (and abrogates) at least these verses (here are 88 out of the 124 Muslim scholars say are abrogated by 9/5): 2/109, 2/190, 2/256, 2/272, 3/20, 4/62, 4/81, 4/90, 5/3, 5/28, 5/48, 5/99, 6/60, 6/66, 6/70, 6/104, 6/107, 6/112, 6/158, 7/87, 7/188, 7/193, 7/199, 8/61, 9/68, 10/41, 10/99, 10/102, 10/108, 11/12, 11/121, 13/40, 15/3, 15/94, 16/35, 16/82, 16/125, 16/126, 16/127, 17/54, 18/29, 18/56, 19/39, 20/130, 21/107, 21/112, 22/49, 22/68, 23/54, 23/96, 24/54, 26/216, 27/92, 28/50, 28/55, 29/18, 29/46, 32/30, 34/25, 34/28, 35/23, 35/24a, 36/17, 39/41, 41/34, 42/6, 42/15, 42/48, 43/83, 43/89, 44/59, 45/14, 46/9, 46/135a, 46/135b, 46/135b, 50/39, 50/45, 51/50-51, 51/54, 52/45, 52/47, 53/29, 67/26, 73/10, 73/11, 79/45, 86/17, 88/22, 109/6. They are all quoted under 9/5. (At least 91 contradictions).

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

####215 47/4c: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them) - - -.” BUT OUR SOURCES TELL THAT THE WORDS “(in fight)” IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE ARAB TEXT – IT IS ADDED BY THE TRANSLATOR (and by more than one). Muslims primarily shall read the Quran in Arab, and there, in case our sources are correct, ######the text is: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers, smite at their necks - - -“. It in case simply is a permanent order to be aggressive.

The real religion of peace. And of honesty.

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

216 47/5c: “Soon will He (Allah*) guide them (Muslims slain for Allah/Muhammad*) and improve their conditions, And admit them to the Garden which He has announced for them”. Vague promises - it can of course be no less than Paradise, but you will find much more epic - and lyric - descriptions not much later. Allah quickly had found a good receipt - or perhaps Muhammad had. Nice promises for the warriors and cheap promises for Muhammad. This claim/promise is invalid if the Quran is a made up book - and no god made a book of that quality.

217 47/7b: “O ye who believe! If ye will aid (from the context it is clear it means in war*) (the cause of) Allah, He will aid you, and plant your feet firmly.” Seemingly a good deal. A strengthening of the morality of Muhammad's warriors. But the deal is good only for Muhammad and his successors if Allah does not exist or is not a god.

218 47/21c: "- - - true to Allah". Not possible unless he exists and is something supernatural. If he does not exist, one only is cheating our self - - - and giving power to one or more leaders. If he on top belongs to the dark forces, one also is cheating oneself, and likely with an even worse result.

###219 48/17c: “- - - but he (the Muslim*) that obeys Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - (Allah) will admit him to Gardens beneath which rivers flow - - -”. The great War God (Allah) and his representative and High Commander on Earth (Muhammad) will admit any dead warrior (aka robber, murderer, terrorist, rapist, etc., “good and lawful” according to the Quran) to their warriors’ paradise with riches and women. Also see 48/16a and 48/16b above + 10/9f above.

220 49/7f: "- - - but Allah has endeared the Faith to you, and made it beautiful in your hearts - - -". Allah or someone else? The Quran's many mistakes, its partly immoral moral code, and its inhuman war religion may make one think about forces very different from benevolent gods.

Another point: If Allah was able to make Islam "beautiful" to some people, why then did he not do the same to the rest of mankind and save them from Hell? There only are 2 possible real answers: He was not able to - which means that either he do not exist, or he for other reasons is unable to do it = not omnipotent. Or he do not want to - and knowing the extreme sadism and horror in Hell, no "explanation away" is valid, and there only is one possible explanation: He is not a good and benevolent god.

221 49/7h: “- - - He (Allah*) has made hateful to you (Muslims*) unbelief - - -”. To hate unbelief for most Muslims means to hate the unbelievers/non-Muslims.

Also see 49/7g just above - a close parallel.

222 49/15b: “Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*), and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons (= made war*) in the Cause of Allah - - -.” Use your wealth and your life in war for Muhammad/Allah – only then you are a real Muslim. A clear message.

223 49/15c: “Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*), and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons (= made war*) in the Cause of Allah: such are the sincere ones". Sugar to terrorists included the self murder ones.

224 52/24: “Round about them (Muslims and their houris*) will serve (devoted) to them, youths (handsome) as pearls well guarded”. These are the servants in Paradise – forever young, handsome men. There is said nothing about from where they come, and like normal in the Quran it is said not a word about how secondary persons in a story feel or like life, or how Paradise is for them. The central persons - you and the ones similar to you - are in Paradise "rich" and on top, and that is what counts – others are of little interest. Empathy with underdogs (f.x. women, houris, servants, slaves) does not exist in the Quran . Well, some to the poor Muslims (but do not give too much) and to orphans, but but for that you find nothing.

And there is another aspect to these handsome youths. The Quran frowns strongly at homosexuality, but all the same it at least some places is silently accepted ("caravan wives", "the 3. gender", etc.). Are these youths a silent temptation - or more - in such a connection?". Muhammad wanted to attract also these warriors? - after all a warrior is a warrior.

Yet another proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god: One more serious difference between their paradise. There are no servants in Yahweh's Paradise. (There cannot be servants in a perfect paradise, because to be servants is not perfect for the servants, and a paradise which is not perfect for everyone living there, is not a perfect paradise. Similar can be said about houris, who have to be sex-dolls for even the most selfish, rough, and primitive warrior.)

225 53/30c: "- - - (Allah*) knoweth best those who stray from His Path, and He knoweth best those who receive guidance". See 2/233h above.

226 57/7e: "- - - whereof He (Allah*) made you (Muslims/people*) heirs". Everything in the world is thanks to Allah, according to the Quran. Then why work or anything yourself?

227 57/10i: "But to all (good Muslims*) has Allah promised a goodly (reward)". All good Muslims end in Paradise. But Paradise has several parts (at least 4 according to the Quran, may be even 6 or more according to the Hadiths - in both cases plus the higher heavens), and one is better than the next it seems. (Also this is very different from the Bible's Paradise - Yahweh and Allah the same god with such fundamental differences of their paradises? Impossible - if they were the same god, it had to be the same Paradise).

228 57/19g: "- - - they (good Muslims*) shall have their Reward and their Light". This only may be true if Allah exists and is a major god, and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

229 57/28f: "- - - He (Allah*) will bestow on you (Muslims*) a double portion of his Mercy". One of the many things impossible if he does not exist and is a god. (If he had been a politician before an election, the newspapers had said "populism". There is a lot of promises of related kind in the Quran - just go looking, and you will find it.)

#230 58/22j: "- - - (Allah has*) strengthened them (Muslims*) with a spirit from Himself". This only may - may - be true if Allah exists and is a god - - - or is from the dark forces. Another thing is that strong believers often feel strengthened by their religion - even clearly false ones - but this goes for believers in any religion.

231 58/22n: "- - - they (Muslims - will be pleased*) with Him (Allah - in Paradise*)". If he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth about him and about the next life.

232 58/22o: "Truly it is the Party of Allah that will achieve Felicity". This will partly depend on the word "Truly" (see 2/2b or 57/22g above), but overwhelmingly on if the Quran is from a god or not.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

233 61/10c: "- - - (Allah can*) save you (people/Muslims*) from a grievous Penalty - - -". Only if he exists and is a god.

234 61/12d: “(If you go to war and/or are killed for Muhammad*) He (Allah*) will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of eternity - - -.” Try to find something even remotely similar to this in the NT!! The same god? Make a bet.

235 64/9f: "- - - He (Allah*) will remove from them (Muslims bound for Paradise*) their ills, and He will admit them to Gardens beneath which rivers flow - - -". If he exists, if he is benevolent, and if he has the power.

236 67/21e: “- - - flight (from the Truth)". But who are fleeing from the truth and the fact that much is wrong in the Quran? - and from the fact that a god does not make mistakes? (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) Also see 13/1g and 40/75 above.

######237 68/35+36: “Shall We (Allah*) treat the people of Faith like the People of Sin? What is the matter with you? How judge you?” Yes, “how judge ye” to believe non-Muslims can be of as good quality humans as Muslims? (But to be down-to-earth: These two verses tell something sinister about the Quran and thus about Muhammad and about Islam. No comments necessary.)

238 69/48a: "But, verily, this is a Message for the God-fearing". Perhaps, but in case from whom, as no god was involved in the making of a book of a quality like the Quran?

####239 69/52d: (YA5674): "- - - Allah has given us (man*) his absolute Truth (a claim, not a proved fact - actually all the errors, etc. prove the claim wrong*) through his Revelations - - -". This is the reason why Muslims and Islam can admit no mistake in the Quran, no matter how obvious it is - a mistake will prove that things are wrong in Allah's "absolute Truth". And this also is why the myriad of mistaken facts and other errors in the Quran, prove 110% and more that something is seriously wrong with the Quran and that it is not from a god - no omniscient god makes mistakes.

A cold fact here: No book as full of errors, etc. as the Quran is the truth - and no such book is from any god (no omniscient god makes mistakes, contradiction, uses invalid logic, uses helpless or unclear language/explanations, etc.)

240 72/13c: "- - - any who believes in his Lord (Allah*) has no fear - - -". This may be correct - like in most other religions. But if the god or gods are made up, they all the same may have a reason to have fear. And as the Quran is not from a god, Muslims have such a reason for fear - it is highly likely Allah is a made up god, like the Quran is a made up book (as it is from no god and no god behind it, it is made up in religious meaning).

241 73/8: "- - - devote yourself thyself (Muslim*) to Him (Allah*) wholeheartedly". Not a too good idea if Allah does not exist - or if he exists, but belongs to the dark forces. That is to say: It might be a good idea for the god's claimed representative on Earth, as on Earth this in praxis for a large part meant: Devote yourself to the god's claimed representative on Earth".

####242 73/20d: “He (Allah*) knoweth that there may be (some) among you - - - fighting in Allah’s cause”. This is the only mentioning of fighting up to around 616 AD - and there was nearly nothing more before 622 AD when Muhammad started to need warriors for his raids for wealth, etc. - in a period where Muhammad had brought nearly 50 - fifty - surahs, not one of which even mention the word fighting (more than 80 by 622 AD. And like is showed below, there is no other unmistakable mentioning of fighting in all the 13 years before Muhammad had to flee to Yathrib (now Medina) - and even this verse may simply mean mental fighting by means of words and deeds, not by means of the sword. This in spite of how central the war for Allah and for Muhammad became. Did Allah change his mind after some years? Or was it Muhammad who changed as he gained power? This early Muhammad did not have enough followers to really fight with weapons. But in case it at this time only meant fighting with words it is even stranger that Allah later so totally changed his mind, from a peaceful religion to one of war and hate, and with so much stress on the duty to fight and die for Allah and Muhammad. If he was omniscient, he should from the very beginning have known what a gift it was to Allah that humans fought and killed each others in reverence to him - not to mention how unfair it was not to tell his first followers about this sure way to Paradise and the houris, etc., and deny them this easy way to the Next Life. Not to mention how unfair it was against the bad ones of his followers not to tell them that they really had a chance to come to Paradise: Be killed in war for Allah, and everything was forgiven, nearly no matter how bad a man you had been. But the really great mystery is: Why did and does an omnipotent god need humans to fight for him? There is no logic in this claim. (But there is logic if Muhammad wanted them to fight for himself.)

It is worth mentioning that Muslim scholars means the contents in this verse concerning fighting, does not belong here. Some - f.x. A73/12 (A73/13 in the English 2008 edition) - means it is written in the future tense, and thus about something which may happen (and did happen) later. The majority - f.x. YA5774 - means that these words were from Medina many years later, but included here (that verses are included in surahs from a different time, is not unusual in the Quran). If any of these explanations is correct, there in reality was no - not one single - case of incitement to war in the Quran until after Muhammad started to need warriors for raids for riches and later for conquests in and after 622 AD. (The "tone" in the verse is so typical for Medina and the war religion Islam developed into there, that it is highly likely the majority of the Muslim scholars are right - that this is a verse from Medina inserted in this surah from the much more peaceful time in Mecca.)

243 74/31j: "- - - those in whose heart is a disease - - -". Another place in the Quran where Muslims looking for hidden meanings in the Quran, are described as "those in whose heart is a disease", as hidden meanings in the Quran only is for Allah to understand. Normally in the Quran this is a name for non-Muslims, but in just this case it may mean Muslims who are doubting Islam and/or hypocrites, as non-Muslims ("Unbelievers") are mentioned separately.

244 74/40-42: “(They (good Muslims*) will be) in Gardens (of Delight): they will question each other, and (ask) of the Sinners: ‘What led you into Hell-Fire?’” There is not a longer distance between Paradise and Hell - communication is possible. This is not the only case of such communication in the Quran.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

245 74/55: "Let any who will, keep it (the Quran/Islam*) in remembrance!" What one at least ought to keep in remembrance, is that no god ever was involved in a book of a quality like the Quran.

#246 76/9: "We (Muslims*) feed you for the sake of Allah alone - - -". Here is one of the differences between the Quran and NT: In the Quran you do good deeds to gain merit from Allah , and according to this verse for this alone. In NT you do good deeds partly to help fellow humans, and partly to gain merit. But beware that we here are speaking about the teachings. In praxis many a Muslims helps also to help fellow humans. But if this is done from personal morality and humanity, it is not a part of the religion (just check before you protest - every place in the Quran where one is recommended to help the poor and others, the motif given is to gain merit in heaven). Also see 76/8a above.

247 78/39e: "- - - let him (Muslim*) take a (straight) Return to his Lord (Allah*)!" This is not possible unless Allah really exists. On the other hand if Allah exists, it is possible no matter whether he is a god or only something from the dark side posing as a god.

248 79/41a: "Their (Muslims'*) abode will be the Garden". If Allah exists and is a god - and if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth.

249 84/8-9: "Soon will his (Muslim's*) account be taken by an easy reckoning, and he will turn to his people, rejoicing!" Only if Allah exists, is a major god, and if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth. (If f.x. the Bible has told the truth, few Muslims will rejoice - and it is very clear the Quran at least has not told neither only nor the full truth, as too much is wrong in that book).

250 89/5a: "Is there (not) in these (verses 1-4*) an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand?" No, there is not. There exists nowhere any valid proof at all for Allah or for Islam or for Muhammad - why do you think Muhammad and Islam so much glorifies blind belief and are so aggressive if anyone says that Muhammad is not reliable like a holy saint? If there had existed the smallest proof, Islam had long since seen to it that every person on Earth had known it.

251 89/29: "- - - My (Allah's*) devotees - - -". See 89/28 just above - except if he exists, it is possible to be his devotees no matter whether he belongs to the good or the dark forces.

252 92/17a: "But those most devoted to Allah shall be far removed from it (hell*) - - -". If Allah exists, and if he is a good and benevolent god (and not f.x. Iblis/the Devil dressed up like the arch angel Gabriel).

253 93/3b: "Thy (Muslims'*) Guardian-Lord (Allah*) hath not forsaken thee (Muhammad?/Muslims?) - - -". Wrong if the Quran is not from a god or if it for some other reasons does not tell the only and full truth. Well, may be it in an ironic way is true then: If Allah never was, he never did forsake anyone. And also if he never was and not is, he also is not displeased.

254 93/4b: "And, verily, the hereafter will be better for thee (Muslim*) than the present". Yes, but in a general meaning only if the Quran is from a god and if it in addition tells only the truth and the full truth. (This surah is from early Mecca, and the few Muslims mostly were poor, uneducated and not well treated, so words like those were a comfort).

255 98/8a: "Their (Muslims') reward is with Allah - - -". If Allah exists, if he in addition has power - white or black (in the last case the reward meeting Muslims in the perhaps next life, will differ quite a bit from what they expect), and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

255 comments. Sub-total = 9228 + 255 = 9483.


>>> Go to  Next Chapter

>>> Go to  Previous Chapter

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".