Allah in the Quran, Chapter 11

 

ALLAH'S CLAIMED "PHYSICAL" AND SUPERNATURAL POWER

 

001 As long as you do not have to back up your words with proofs, it is cheap - yes, totally free of charge - to claim all and any power for your god. Which Muhammad did - claimed all kinds of power for Allah, but fled from or fast talked himself away from all requests for proofs. #####This in spite of that the fact that he demanded proofs from his opponents, proves that he reckoned proofs to be essential.

002 A slick and cheap way to get himself a powerful god - at least very cheap if Allah is a made up pagan god, so that none of the promises about the promised next life has to be kept.

And an as slick and cheap way to get himself a platform of power and lots of young women, also here especially if Allah is a made up god or a god very different from his description in the Quran, so that payment in the claimed next life was a bluff. Which is extremely likely, as no god ever was involved in a book of a sorry quality like the Quran, and as no god like the Allah described in that book, has ever in all the history of humanity proved neither his very existence, nor any of his claimed powers. Lots and lots of claims, but not one single proved case. Yes, not one. (The best proof for this? Islam had lectured the entire world about it, and in magnum letters, if there had been even one proved case. Islam is totally silent, except the whispers about never proved - actually proved wrong by the Quran - claims of miracles made by Muhammad, etc. And those whispers are made to believing followers and proselytes, never in earnest to learned scientists.

003 If the old books included the Quran tell the truth, Jesus and Yahweh delivered at least some proofs for that something or someone supernatural was involved. But Muhammad and Allah? Nothing. Not one valid proof at all through the entire history and prehistory. Yes, not one single trace from a god like Allah, not one trace from prophets or messengers or for such a god - or from a book like the Quran - anywhere in the world, and not even a distant rumor about a religion like Islam at any time before 610 AD, when Muhammad started his sect and later religion.

Muhammad used a lot of strong words about Allah's power, included lots of superlatives. You see some of them below. But never anything but words. And words cost exactly nothing.

004 You all the same of course are permitted to believe them if you are able to. But remember that Muhammad accepted and himself practiced the use of dishonesty as working tools - al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing) (even though the names may be younger than Muhammad) deceit, and even broken words/promises/oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah can cheat, cheating is ok - but how much cheating is it then in the Quran? - by Allah or by Muhammad). One has to be very naive to believe that a man of that moral quality and believing in the use of dishonesty - even a few(?) lies in the very Quran - was totally honest in the Quran and about his god and platform of power.

005 How many Muslims have ever sat down and thought over how much of the texts in the Quran which can be true? - not is true, but at least can possibly be true? And how much cannot? And what may or must be the reason for the "cannots"? There is a lot of naivety in believing only because your forefathers tell you something must be the truth, because their uneducated forefathers told them that their forefathers had claimed so - "taqlid". (This is the real situation for Islam and its Muslims even today.) Few Muslims ever really check the truth of the Quran - and what does it tell that many of those few afterwards leave the religion (3 out of 4 within 3 years)?

006 Some quotable quotes:

"A proof is one or more proved facts which can give only one conclusion".

"Words are cheap, claims are cheap, proofs are reliable, the reality is the truth".

"A claim without a proof may be dismissed without a proof".

"One proof is worth a thousand claims".

"Naivety is the deceiver's easiest field to cultivate".

007 And a psychological fact:

"A psychopath going for power or women, uses any means and may be totally immoral and inhuman".

##########  Another - and serious - point is that to "explain" that the Quran means something different from what it really says - f.x. that Muhammad made miracles or prophesies - is to corrupt it.

Also: What is sure, is that no god ever made a holy book as full of wrong facts, other errors, contradictions, unclear language, etc. like the Quran. ##### Besides: Which one of the 20-30 known versions accepted by Islam of the Quran (see 15/9c) - if any (and there were even more versions through the times) - is in case the correct one?

Finally: Always when you read the Quran, Hadiths, and other Islamic books, you should remember that Muhammad accepted the use of and himself used dishonesty in many forms in words and deeds. Even if the names are younger, it was he who institutionalized dishonesty like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing), the use of deceit ("war is deceit" - and "everything" is war), betrayal (f.x. the peace delegation from Khaybar), and even the disuse of oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah could cheat, cheating is ok)), which also includes the disuse of words and promises, as they are weaker than oaths = when oaths can be disused, so can words and promises. On top of this it is very clear from the Quran and all other central Islamic books, that Muhammad also liked respect and power and women. Combine these lusts with his acceptance of and personal use of dishonesty - even the gravest kinds: How reliable are that kind of men normally? - and how true and reliable are their never proved claims and tales?

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

008 1/2a: "- - - Allah The Cherished and Sustainer of the Worlds (plural and wrong*)". This is one of the very, very many not documented or proved claims in the Quran - claims in the Quran which as easy can be used by any believer in any religion on behalf of his god(s), as long as he can evade the requests for proofs. There nowhere inside or outside Islam ever was a single proof for this lose claim or other lose claims, this in spite of many requests for proofs, which Muhammad was unable to produce. Lose claims and lose statements, etc. built on other not proved claims are very cheap, as long as you do not have to prove anything. Muhammad, the Quran, Muslims and Islam used/use such ones very often.

009 1/4a: "(Allah is*) Master of the Day of Judgment." One more claim which never is proved. And one more every believer in every religion can claim on behalf of his/her god(s) free of charge, as long as requests for proofs can be evaded.

010 2/20b: “And if Allah willed, He could take away their (non-Muslims*) faculty of hearing and seeing; for Allah hath power over all things”. But for 1400 years non-Muslims have had no reduction neither in seeing, nor in hearing.

011 2/20c: "- - - Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed in the Quran - never proved anywhere.

*012 2/21a: "(Allah*)- - - your Guardian-Lord - - -". Yes - if the Quran is not made up - with those many mistakes, contradictions, etc. it is not made by any god - even not if Allah exists, if he is a major god, and if his religion after all is in accordance with the Quran. Nothing of this is proved, even though many asked for proof - Muhammad was unable to deliver any.

*013 2/22e: “(Allah sends down*)- - - rain from the heavens (plural and wrong*) - - -". Rain is one of the many, many natural phenomena Muhammad high-jacked without any proof as an indication or a proof for his god - logically absolutely invalid as long as it is not proved that it really is Allah who sends it down. See 2/22c above and 11/7a below.

014 2/22g: “(Allah*) brought forth therewith fruits for your sustenance - - -”. Nature brings forth fruits - but nowhere has it showed that a god - not to mention Allah - is involved. A logically invalid proof if it is not first proved that it really is Allah who makes the fruits. Also see 11/7a below.

015 2/27c: "- - - what Allah has ordered to be joined - - -". Are there any real proofs for such orders?

016 2/28e: “(Allah*) will cause you to die - - -”. To die is a natural process - unless Islam proves something else (Well, Islam has made many die - some hundreds of millions if our sources are correct (the price for resisting the "good and benevolent god Allah, who wanted no compulsion in religion, has been high - and the same has meeting with Muslim "lawful and good" slave hunters been) - and die in not natural ways, but that is another story). Also see 2/28b just above and 11/7a below - only Yahweh in case has proved power stronger than the death (if the old stories are correct).

017 2/70c: "- - - if Allah wills". See 14/19d below. But beware that just here and some other places in the Quran it may be the standard Muslim reservation meaning something like "I want to do so-and-so if Allah permits". Beware that Allah may be spiteful if you do not say this about things you plan to do in the future - at least according to Islam.

018 2/77a: "Know they not that Allah knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal?". This is a rather obscure verse, but Muslims frequently claim - but do not agree on - that it is about the old Islamic claim that Muhammad was mentioned in the Bible, but that the Jews and the Christians have falsified it or at other points refuse to see what they claim is the real, though obscure, meaning of some verses in the book. Once more the old facts:

  1. Islam has not one single valid proof for Allah - it does not exist, even though uneducated or dishonest Muslims often try to claim the opposite. Serious Muslim scholars admit this, though they normally do not tell their congregations.
  2. Islam has not one single valid proof for Muhammad's connection to a god - which is the likely reason why they cling so strongly to the claimed "miracles" connected to Muhammad in the Hadiths, even though the Quran very clearly proves Muhammad was not connected to any miracle (then friends and foes did not have to ask for proofs, and he himself did not have to explain away his/Allah's lack of miracles - even the learned scholars of Islam admits that "the only miracle connected to Muhammad, is the Quran". The lack of proof for his connection to a god, also is a main reason why Muslims reacts so strongly to skepticism to Muhammad - he is the weak link in Islam, and if this link is broken, Islam is a false religion. They thus cannot afford the slightest doubts about Muhammad or his integrity. After all for Islam belief is more essential than to find out if the belief may be true - this no matter what price Muslims will have to pay, if there is "another side" run by a real god, not Allah - or by an Allah different from what the Quran and all its errors tell.
  3. Muslims feel dire need to find proofs for both Allah and for Muhammad's connection to a god. No matter how strong the belief, it is not the same as a proof.
  4. In addition the Quran in clear words tells that Muhammad is foretold both in OT and NT, and then Muslims HAVE to find him no matter what or how - if not something is wrong with the Quran and hence with the religion.
  5. It is very clear that Muhammad is not openly mentioned anywhere in the Bible - not even Muslims claim that.
  6. Consequently they go searching for him hidden in the texts - and it is so urgent for them to find him, that wishful thinking is far more central than objectivity.

For more see separate chapter in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran" - http://www.1000mistakes.com. Also see 2/76b above and 7/157e below..

019 2/106c: "- - - knowest thou not that Allah hath power over all things?". An easy claim - but never clearly proved, not one single time, in 1400 years.

020 2/109h: “- - - Allah hath power over all things.” Perhaps - and perhaps not. At least he has never shown his power, not even when asked several times by his followers - and by skeptics - for a proof of his existence. Muhammad glossed it over with fast words - not all of them logically even true (f.x. that a real proof of a god would make no-one believe anyhow - rubbish to be polite, a clear lie to be realistic), and Muhammad was too intelligent and knew too much about people not to know it was untrue.

021 2/115b: "- - - whithersoever ye (people*) turn, there is the Presence of Allah - - -". Perhaps, but he has never been provably noticed - and words are cheap.

022 2/115c: “For Allah is All-Pervading, All-Knowing”. Looking at the miserable state the "facts", the “signs”, and the "proofs" in the Quran are in, strong real proofs for this are urgently needed. Also see 2/233h and 35/38b below.

023 2/139a: “Will ye (Jews and Christians) dispute with us about Allah, seeing that He is our Lord and your Lord - - -”. Islam likes to pretend or state without any proof, that Allah and Yahweh/God is the same god. But both the gods and their teachings are very different - as said before especially if you compare the bloody god of war Allah was turned into in and after 622 AD, after Muhammad came to need warriors for highwaymen and later for wars, with the far milder and more benevolent God we meet in NT. The Quran makes a lot of statements, but not one single valid proof, even though it should be easy for Allah to prove something - at least his own existence. Besides: Read history (drop glorifying propaganda and judge from acts and deeds and demands and introduced rules, moral code, etc.- "do against others like you want others do against you") - Muslim history like ibn Ishaq if you want - and the Hadiths, and also the Quran, and see what kind of a man Muhammad really was! We do not accept the word of a man with that kind of moral and ethical standards, without proofs - there has to be limits to being naïve. Also: Contradiction to the Bible.

024 2/148e: "For Allah hath power over all things". A claim. Muhammad never was able to prove it.

025 2/165g: "- - - to Allah belongs all power - - -." Claim - as normal not proved, as Muhammad was unable to prove anything at all of his central claims - only fast-talk for why he could not prove anything. One more of the claims any follower of any religion can claim for his/her god(s), as unproved words are that cheap.

026 2/187b: "- - - what Allah hath ordained - - -". Allah or nature? The Quran and Muhammad never were able to prove anything at all of the central points. There only were and are words and claims. Yahweh at least proved a number of things if the old books (included the Quran) tell the truth - Allah nothing. Also see 11/7a below.

027 2/209d: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly has proved that power.

028 2/220e: "He (Allah*) is indeed Exalted in Power - - -". One more of the never proved or documented claims - he never clearly proved this claimed power. There are so many of these claims - and so easy to find. Look and you will find more - also other places than in the Quran.

#########029 2/225a: “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your heart”. If you swear an oath without thinking it over - or not enough over – you are not bound by it. But how are other people to know if the oath you have made, is binding for you or not - or if you will break it? Besides; you may break also a more serious oath if that will give a better result, but you may have to pay expiation to Allah for it. See f.x. 2/224e-f above.

030 2/228d: "He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". Even one more of the never proved or documented claims - he never proved this claimed power. There are so many of these claims - and so easy to find. Look and you will find more - also other places than in the Quran.

031 2/240d: "He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". Even one more of the never proved or documented claims - he never clearly proved this claimed power. There are so many of these claims - and so easy to find. Look and you will find more - also other places than in the Quran.

032 2/247d: "Allah hath chosen him (King Talut/Saul*) above you (Jews*), and hath gifted him abundantly with knowledge and bodily prowess: Allah granteth His authority to whom He pleaseth". Except for the bodily prowess, do you see the parallels to what Muhammad claimed about himself? There are many, many such parallels in Muhammad's tales. It was a way to illustrate that what problems and disbelief he - Muhammad - met in his society, was similar to what was normal for prophets to meet and experience, and thus that Muhammad was a normal prophet (though the greatest of them all).

033 2/247e: "- - - Allah granteth His authority - - -". Impossible unless he really exists, something which has never been proved.

034 2/255a: "There is no god but He (Allah*) - - -". (Also see 6/106b and 25/18a below). But:

  1. Both according to the Quran and to the Bible the old Jewish god (Yahweh) existed.
  2. Both according to the Quran and to the Bible Yahweh has proved his existence and his power many times, included via Jesus - there (according to both books if one or both of them tell(s) the truth on this point) is no doubt about his existence and his power - if the old books tell the truth.
  3. The Quran claims that Allah and Yahweh are the same god. But this is not true, as the teachings fundamentally are far too different, especially if you compare the Quran with NT and its New Covenant via Jesus - a covenant Muslims never are told about by their imams or mullahs (f.x. Luke 22/20). The same goes for the underlying ethics and moral (parts of it is very twisted in the Quran compared to the most basic rule; "do onto others what you want others do onto you") and the stressing of the value of empathy (empathy hardly is to be found in the Quran, and non-existing towards victims and non-Muslims), etc., not to mention that this also goes for the view on thieving (looting), lying (f.x. al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie), killing, etc. The only possible exception is if the god is strongly schizophrenic. (See separate chapter about this in http://www.1000mistakes.com (planned completed in the final edition in 2015 or at latest in 2016 and copied in this book). Demand proofs from the next Muslim telling you that Yahweh is the same god as Allah.
  4. The Quran tries to explain away the differences between the Bible and the Quran, and thus the differences in the teachings, by claiming - as normal for Muhammad without a single document or proof - that the Bible is falsified. But this is not true, as science long since has proved there is no falsification. May be some mistakes - f.x. in Genesis - but no falsification. What is even more convincing, is the fact that also Islam has proved the same, and most strongly, by not being able to find one single documented falsification among all the tens of thousands relevant old manuscripts.(There exist some 300 copies or fragments of the Gospels older than 610 AD, 13ooo other manuscripts or fragments from other parts of the Bible and 32ooo other documents/fragments with quotes or references from the Bible, from before 610 AD (before that there was no reason to falsify anything to expel Islamic teaching) - parts of this also older than 325 AD and council that year in Nicaea. (The numbers can vary some from one source to another, but around these ones.) All have exactly the same and invariable texts within minor variations normal for hand-copied documents, and not one shows any traces of being tampered with - falsified - in ways that modern science can find. And modern science is good at finding falsifications, as it a frequent kind of crime. No scratching out of text, no other tries of removing old text, no putting in new words, no new words written with another kind of ink, no new words with another handwriting, etc. Islam also never even has tried to explain how it could be possible to make identical falsifications in the 40-45ooo and more different manuscripts spread over the whole known world and wider - or how it was possible for Jews and Christians to agree on identical falsifications. Muslims often claim the falsifications of OT were done by the old prophet Ezra, but for one thing that was an impossibility, and for another the Quran indirectly, but strongly proves that even OT in case could not be falsified until after 33 AD (Jesus used it, and then it could not have been falsified until after his death) - and the Qumran scrolls prove it cannot have been falsified later, too. Further Islam claims that NT was falsified at the mentioned meeting of bishops in Nicaea in 325 AD. But for one thing the agenda for that meeting is well known and nothing like this was on that agenda. For another ting a lot of manuscripts older than 325 AD exist - not one of them falsified. And for a third: It is exactly as difficult to get bishops change the Bible, as it is to make ayatollahs change the Quran.

     

    As for OT Muslims claim that it like mentioned was falsified by Ezra, when it "had to be rewritten". But for one thing not all Jews were deported to Babylon (f.x. 2. Kings 25/12), and you bet the ones who remained took care of their holy scriptures - religion is a comfort in difficult times (according to science some 25ooo were deported, whereas some 75ooo remained). And for another thing also the Jews in exile had managed to keep some copies of the scriptures. And for a third: Jews lived in many countries also at that time, and in each and every synagogue, there always was and is at least one copy of the scriptures - in addition to what was owned by members of the congregations. (F.x. Ezra "was a teacher well versed in the Laws of Moses" = the Books of Moses (Ezra 7/6) - which meant they had the books) The OT simply never was rewritten - there never was a reason for that.) There simply never were any falsifications of any part of the Bible - as proved by science. But it is as said even better proved by Islam: If there had existed one single falsification, Islam had found it and screamed about it. Nobody has ever heard such a scream. And if the - according to the Quran - good Muslim Jesus had discovered falsifications in the old books in the synagogues when he went around teaching, such a prophet had been most clear about it (remember here that the prophets - Jesus was a great prophet also according to the Quran - received a copy of the holy scriptures from the god, and he thus at once had seen if the copies in the synagogues had been falsified). He spoke against new rules from the Pharisees, etc., making the old texts unnecessarily strict, but not one word about falsifications of the old texts - not in the Bible, and not in the Quran. Thus even the OT in case cannot have been falsified until after Jesus' death in 33 AD. And science knows ever so well that it was never falsified later (like mentioned f.x. from the Qumran scrolls). Islam will have to bring proofs for falsification of OT as well as of NT, and not only lose claims, if they want to be believed.

  5. As Yahweh clearly existed if the old books tell the truth, and as clearly was/is not the same god as Allah, and as Islam's "explanation" ("falsification") is wrong, Islam here has a problem when claiming there only is one god - Allah. Even if we omit all other (claimed) gods, there still remains Yahweh, whose existence they have admitted, even though they wrongly mix him up with Allah.
  6. This problem grows even more interesting when one remembers that Yahweh has proved his existence and power many times if either the Bible or the Quran or both tell the truth on this point, whereas Allah has proved exactly nothing - there only are words and claims from a man with a very doubtful moral, but wish for power and women (even according to Muslim books, included the Quran - take away the glorious words and see what remains) behind the claims for Allah's existence and power.
  7. And: If there then exists one, but only one, god - who is most likely to exist? - Yahweh or Allah?

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We repeat because it is so essential:

Some Muslims as mentioned claim Ezra falsified OT, but in addition to other facts:

THERE IS ONE STRONG FACT CONNECTED TO JESUS AND THE OTHER OLD JEWISH PROPHETS: ACCORDING TO THE QURAN THEY ALL WERE GOD MUSLIMS - AN IMPOSSIBILITY IF THEIR CLAIMED HOLY BOOKS FROM ALLAH WERE FALSIFIED. THUS THE CLAIMED FALSIFICATION OF ALSO OT CANNOT HAVE HAPPENED UNTIL AFTER JESUS (F.X. EZRA COULD NOT HAVE FALSIFIED OT - IF HE HAD, JESUS HAD RECEIVED WRONG INFORMATION AND HAD BEEN NO GOOD MUSLIM). THIS IN ADDITION TO THAT THE BOOKS WERE SENT DOWN (DIRECTLY) FROM ALLAH TO THE PROPHETS, ACCORDING TO THE QURAN, AND ERRORS IN THEM THEREFORE SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE. ALL THE OLD GOOD MUSLIM PROPHETS INCLUDED JESUS THUS MUST HAVE HAD CORRECT HOLY BOOKS - THE OLD JEWISH SCRIPTURES/OT. IF NOT F.X. JESUS HAD BEEN TEACHING WRONG THINGS, WHICH HE DID NOT DO ACCORDING TO THE QURAN (and if the scrolls he read from in the synagogues had differed from what he received from Heaven, he had told about it - JESUS WOULD HAVE SEEN IT AT ONCE IF THE HOLY BOOKS IN THE SYNAGOGUES WERE DIFFERENT FROM THE COPY THE QURAN TELLS WERE SENT TO EACH PROPHET)). THE ONLY POSSIBLE CONCLUTION HERE IS THAT ALSO NO PART OF THE OLD SCRIPTURES - OT - CAN HAVE BEEN FALSIFIED UNTIL AFTER JESUS TIME = AFTER THE YEAR 33 AD..

BUT THERE EXIST PLENTY OF MANUSCRIPTS AND FRAGMENTS OLD ENOUGH TO PROVE THAT OT WAS NOT SIMILAR TO THE QURAN AT THAT TIME!!! IT WAS SIMILAR TO THE SCRIPTURES OF TODAY!!! (f.X. the mentioned Qumran scrolls).

In addition there is the problem: How in case make Jews and Christians agree on what new texts to use when they falsified (parts of) the Quran into OT??? And how to make ALL Jews spread over large parts of the world unprotestingly accept the new and falsified holy scriptures - and destroy all the old copies so thoroughly that not one piece of any of them has been found later? This in addition to the claimed falsification of NT and all the impossibilities and improbabilities which have to be "explained" away concerning the claimed falsification of NT.

THIS IS ONE OF THE CLAIMS MUHAMMAD MADE UP.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

035 2/255e: "Who is there can intercede in His (Allah's*) presence except as He permiteth?" Perhaps one or more - especially if Allah is a made up god - - - and he only exists in a book so full of mistakes, etc. that it is from no god, told by an unreliable man wanting power, riches - at least for bribes - and women, and using his religion for his platform of power, like so many a self proclaimed prophet through the times.

036 2/255i: "For He (Allah*) is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)". One thing is the question if he really exists - there never was the slightest proof or valid sign for him. But see 1/1a above and see if he really deserves glory - - - if he exists.

037 2/259h: "- - - Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed, never proved - also not here as it is not proved Allah really did what this old Jewish legend told. Legends often have good stories, but zero reliability.

038 2/260f: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power - - -". - which he in case never has proved.

039 2/269a: “He (Allah*) granteth wisdom to whom He pleaseth - - -”. Wisdom is a result of genes/intelligence and knowledge (with a possible exception for Yahweh). Many gods say they provided it - not one single of them has proved it till this date, with the possible exception of Yahweh. Words and lose statements are much cheaper than proofs and proved facts.

040 2/284f: "For Allah hath power over all things". He in case never has proved this.

041 2/286g: "- - - Thou (Allah*) is our (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Only if he exists. If he is a god. If he is behind the stories in the Quran. And if the Quran in addition retells the stories 100% correctly.

042 3/4e: "(Allah is*) - - - the Exalted in Might - - -". He in case never clearly proved it.

043 3/6c: "(Allah is*) - - - the Exalted in Might - - -". He in case never clearly proved it.

044 3/18g: "(Allah is*) - - - the Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly proved it.

045 3/26b: "O Allah! Lord of Power (and Rule)- - -". Contradicted by the Bible which claims that all power belongs to Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

046 3/26h: "- - - over all things Thou (Allah*) hast Power". See 3/26a+b above.

047 3/29c: "And Allah has the power over all things". Well, at least the Quran claims so. There are so many lose and never proved or documented claims in the Quran, that you just can go looking, and you will find - they are easy to see. Claims like this any priest in any religion can as easily claim for his god(s) as long as one can evade all requests for proofs - words and lose claims are that cheap.

048 3/29a: "Whether ye hide what is in your hearts or reveal it, Allah knows it all". See 2/233h above and 35/38b below.

049 3/55e: "- - - I (Allah*) will judge - - -". Only if he exists, and only if he in addition is a major god.

050 3/62d: "(Allah is*) - - - the Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly proved it.

051 3/68f: "- - - Allah is the Protector of those who have faith". If Allah exists. If he is a god. If he is behind what is told in the Quran. And if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

052 3/79g: "- - - Him (Allah*) Who is truly the Cherisher of all - - -". This only can be true if Allah exists and is a major god. In addition see 1/1a above.

053 3/122f: "- - - in Allah should the Faithful (ever) put their trust". A doubtful advice if the Quran - and thus Allah - is made up (and at least it is from no god - far too many errors, etc.).

###054 3/126e: "- - - Allah, the Exalted - - -". Read the Quran like it ought to be read if you want to find the reality behind the religion: First you arrange the surahs according to age, so that you see the development of the religion, and especially the big and never explained change in the god and the religion around 622-624 AD from a rather peaceful religion to a full-fledged religion of war, included dishonesty, apartheid, suppression, rape, and blood, at the time Muhammad started needing warriors. Further you skip the glorifying cheap words, and read what is demanded, what rules, ethical and moral codes, etc. are introduced or glorified, what is done, etc. - in other words the realities, not the propaganda. Is Allah - if he exists - really exalted? And for that case what about Muhammad and what about Islam?

055 3/150a: "- - - Allah is your Protector- - -". Once more: If he exists. If he really is a god. If he is behind what is told in the Quran. And if the Quran in addition tells the full and only truth on this point.

056 3/165b: "- - - Allah hath power over all things". Why then does he have to make humans fight wars for himself?

057 3/189d: "- - - Allah hath power over all things." Allah decides everything - the Muslim teaching of predestination in addition to his total power - - - and again the impossibility even for a god to combine total predestination (- all things -) with free will of man = one more reminding of that something is wrong. And if it here is meant physical power, such power from Allah never is proved - - - well, actually none of his claimed kinds of power has ever been reliably proved. And his power? He has never clearly proved it.

We also remind you that f.x. prayers or forgiving will have no effect in Islam, as Allah long since has predestined everything according to a Plan nobody and nothing - f.x. prayers or forgiving - can change. And what about morality and ethics behind punishments and rewards if Allah predestines everything like the Quran clearly and the Quran, without reservations states many places = no free will for man!?

058 4/1aa: "- - - Guardian-Lord - - -". Not possible unless he exists - if not he f.x. does not have the necessary power. Besides: He is some guardian if he belongs to the dark forces, something the fact that all the errors in the Quran proves it is not from a god + parts of the laws, moral and ethical codes in the Quran may indicate (f.x. many laws and rules are not in accordance with "do to others like you want others do to you", but fits the dark forces better than they fit a claimed good an benevolent god).

059 4/1e: "- - - for Allah ever watches over you (Muslims*)". See 4/1a above.

060 4/6c: "- - - but all-sufficient is Allah in taking account". Do not try to cheat - Allah will punish you.

061 4/30c: "- - - it is easy for Allah". Allah is omniscient and omnipotent If he exists and if he in addition is a god.

062 4/34j: "- - - Allah is Most High, Great (above you (people*)) all". If he exists. And if he in addition is like told in the Quran - the full and only truth. And if not f.x. Yahweh is higher and greater. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

063 4/47g: "- - - the decision of Allah must be carried out". Only if Allah is a reality. (And whose decisions were they if they in reality were not from Allah? - and no god ever was behind a book of a quality like the Quran.

064 4/56f: "(Allah is*) - - - Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly proved it.

065 4/70c: "- - - and sufficient is it that Allah knoweth all". This is strongly contradicted by the fact that Allah time and again and again had and has to test his followers - Allah's knowledge is not enough, so he has to test to find out. Or was it Muhammad's wish for warriors which dominated?

066 4/70d: "- - - and sufficient is it that Allah knoweth all". All the mistakes, etc. in the Quran prove beyond not only any reasonable doubt, but beyond any doubt at all, that he knows far from all - - - if it is he who made that book.

067 4/81e: "- - - enough is Allah as a disposer of affairs". If he exists, if he is a major god, and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

068 4/84i: "- - - for Allah is the strongest in might - - -". A might he in case never clearly has proved.

069 4/84j: "- - - for Allah is the strongest in might - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh is strongest - and Yahweh has proved himself if the old books tell the truth, whereas nothing is proved about Allah, except that he has not sent down the Quran - no omniscient god is behind a book of that quality. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

070 4/85e: "- - - Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed, never proved. (And remember a proof is not just a claim or a reference to an authority. A proof is "one or more proved facts which can give only one conclusion". The reason why claimed proofs from Islam normally are invalid, is that they do not build on proved facts, only on lose words or claims - or on thin air. Sometimes also because more than one conclusion is possible - then it at best is an indication, but not a proof.

071 4/126d: "- - - He (Allah*) is it that encompasseth all things". We are back to the old black fact: This claim only can be true if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about everything. And if Allah really exists and is a major god.

072 4/132d: "- - - and enough is Allah to carry through all affairs". Only if he exists and only if he in addition is a god of some power, neither of which is in any way proved.

073 4/133d: "- - - for Allah hath power this to do". He in case never clearly has proved that power - not once in 1400 years.

074 4/135e: "- - - Allah can best protect - - -". If he if he is a god, if he sent down the Quran, and if Muhammad told the truth and only the truth about this when reciting(?) it. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

075 4/158d: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power". He in case never clearly has proved it.

076 4/165a: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power". He in case never clearly has proved it.

077 4/171v: "And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs." One more claim which never was proved.

078 5/17f: "Who then hath the least power against Allah - - -". Many if Allah is a fiction. Perhaps f.x. Yahweh if not - and certainly if Allah in case belongs to the dark powers.

079 5/17l: "For Allah hath power over all things". A power he in case never clearly has demonstrated.

080 5/28d: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher of the worlds". Only if he exists and is correctly described in the Quran.

081 5/40h: "Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed. never really proved.

082 5/54i: "- - - Allah encompasseth all - - -". Similar often claimed, never proved.

083 5/95g: "- - - Allah is - - - Lord of Retribution". No comments necessary (though you may see 3/77b above).

084 5/116e: "For Thou (Allah*) knowest in full all that is hidden". See 2/233h above.

085 5/118b: "- - - Thou (Allah*) art the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, never clearly documented.

086 5/120d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) who hath power over all things". Often claimed, never clearly proved.

087 5/120e: "- - - it is He (Allah*) who hath power over all things". Strongly contradicted by the Bible, which says that the powerful one is Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

088 6/17: "He (Allah*) hath power over all things." Well, that is Muhammad's many times repeated, but not documented claim - which Allah was totally unable (or unwilling ?) to prove, even if it obviously would have worked (in spite of Muhammad's words to the opposite - one of the times when Muhammad clearly knows he is lying in the Quran, as he was too intelligent to believe this himself. This even more so as he told about the sorcerers of the Pharaoh and about listeners to Jesus being strongly influenced by miracles).

089 6/18a: "He (Allah*) is the Irresistible - - -". One more of the never proved claims any believer can make free of charge on behalf of his god(s) if he/she can evade any requests for proofs. Words are that cheap.

090 6/34b: "- - - there is none that can alter the Words (and Decrees) of Allah". At least when it comes to what is claimed sent down in the Quran, reality alters quite a lot of it. (But this is indicating the predestination - Allah decides and nobody can change his decisions, according to the Quran. Incompatible with the Bible. May be worse: Incompatible with the claim that man has free will.)

091 6/57d: "The Command rests with none but Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims it rests with Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

092 6/61a: "He (Allah*) is the Irresistible - - -". This and similar are often claimed, but never proved. It takes blind belief to believe in it - but then Muhammad glorified and Islam glorifies blind belief, as none of them could/can prove any of their central claims. In all other aspects of life, blind belief is the easiest way to be deceived, but in religion Muhammad glorified it and Islam glorifies it, in spite of that all claimed information comes only from a hardly reliable man believing in lies, etc. (f.x. al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie - and Kitman - the lawful half-truth) and even in deceit and in broken words/promises/oaths, but liking power and riches (at least for bribes), and women. Is there a connection?

093 6/62c: "- - - Allah, their (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Only if he exists, is a god, and is correctly described in the Quran.

094 6/62e: "- - - is not His (Allah's*) the Command?". Only if Allah exists and is a god according to the tales of the Quran - - - and if the Quran's tales are true in every detail about this.

095 6/70e: "- - - there is no protector or intercessor except Allah - - -". Contradictions:

  1. The Quran tells that some ones can be intercessors if Allah permits it.
  2. It also is made clear that Muhammad has got the right to be intercessor even on the Last Day.
  3. And then there is the question about f.x. Yahweh.

096 6/95c: "It is Allah who causeth (more or less everything*)." Well, we point to some of the very many lose and never documented and thus invalid claims in the Quran (you meet even more when you debate with Muslims). There are many. Use your brain and your knowledge, and you will find plenty of them. But this like the others: Never a valid proof.

097 6/96d: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, never clearly proved. Never.

098 6/102c "- - - He (Allah*) hath the power to dispose of all affairs". Never proved, often claimed.

099 6/109f: "Certainly (all) Signs are in the power of Allah - - -". A power often claimed, but never proved".

100 6/115f: “- - - none can change His (Allah's*) Words “. Perhaps no Muslim can, because that means that something is wrong in the foundation and fundamentals of Islam - they cannot afford to change any word in the Quran for that reason. But f.x. reality and science can show if some - a lot - of the words in the Quran are wrong. Which they are. And then there is Yahweh - according to the Bible it is Yahweh who has the final say on every point he wants to act on. Also there are changes in the Quran – the differences in the old Qurans, the different “ways of reading” (a camouflaged way to talk about what in reality are varieties of the texts), the abrogated verses and the change in the religion around/after 622 AD – by whom and why? Well, whoever the maker of the Quran is, he is contradicting himself, as he clearly changes it himself when something forces him to – try and fail? Or change his mind about more blood and injustice from 622 AD on? – or because of other problems or things he has learnt in between?

  1. 2/106: “None of our revelations do We (Allah*) abrogate or cause to be forgotten, But We substitute something better or similar”. Words can be changed.
  2. 16/101: “When We (Allah*) substitute one revelation for another – and Allah knows best what He reveals - - -“. No doubt that he can change his own words, at least – when he did not do things right at once. (##############################################These two verses – 2/106 and 16/101 – are the main fundamentals under Islam’s rules for abrogation – making verses invalid when there are contradictions. See separate chapter about abrogation).

(2 contradictions).

101 6/150g: "- - - their Guardian-Lord (Allah*) - - -". Only if he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran in addition has described him correctly.

102 6/162c: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells this is Yahweh's job. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

103 6/164a: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Cherisher of all things - - -". See 6/162b+c.

104 7/54a: "You (people’s*) Guardian-Lord is Allah - - -". One more of the many not proved claims you find in the Quran - claims any believer in any religion can make on behalf of his or her god(s), free of charge as long as no proofs are required, and claims which are totally without value as proofs as long as it is not first proved it is the god who really is behind what happens. In this case the claim only may be - may be, not is - true if Allah really exists, if he really is a dominant god, and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about this. But not even the existence of Allah is proved, and it is thoroughly proved that the Quran is full of mistakes, etc., both of which prove that Islam has to produce proofs for the claim, if they want to be believed - and proofs, not just lose words or more unproved claims.

NB: According to psychologists you should be careful when somebody uses rhetorical questions as arguments, because such questions very often indicate that they lack real arguments or real facts. They warn that such methods often are used by deceivers. We quote: "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar - and "surely" - are very often used.

105 7/54k: "Is it not His (Allah's*) to - - - govern?" Only if he exists and is a top god.

106 7/54l: "Is it not His (Allah's*) to create and to govern". A rhetoric question expecting a certain answer. But it is impossible to know as long as one does not have reliable information, and as long as it is not documented even that Allah exists, and if he in case is a major god. There only are Muhammad's never proved claims - a man of very doubtful reliability. He even according to central Islamic literature, is a doubtful and unreliable person (read the realities and omit the glorifying cheap words, and see what picture emerges of him).

107 7/54m: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds (plural and wrong*)". Often claimed, never proved - and a claim easy to make for any believer in any religion on behalf of his/her god(s). Wrong unless Islam proves the opposite.

108 7/54+58f: “He (Allah*) created - - - the moon - - - thus do We explain the Signs - - -”. See the one just above. Wrong unless Islam proves the opposite.

109 7/67c: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord and Cherisher of the Worlds (plural and wrong*)!" Often claimed, never proved.

110 7/71b: "- - - without authority from Allah - - -". Allah has no authority unless he exists and in addition is a god.

111 7/104c: "- - - (Allah*) the Lord of the Worlds - - -". Never proved - and contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh is the Lord of everything. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

112 7/190b: "- - - Allah is exalted high above (anything*) - - -". Often claimed, never proved. There only are the words of Muhammad for this claim - and judge for yourself how reliable a man Muhammad was with his al-Taqiyyas (lawful lies), Kitmans (lawful half-truths), etc., broken promises/words/oaths ok according to the Quran (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah can cheat, cheating is ok - but how much is then cheating in the Quran?), and his "War is deceit", etc.

113 7/196a: "For my (Muhammad's*) Protector is Allah - - -". The old, bitter fact: Only if he exists and is a god.

114 8/26c: "- - - He (Allah*) provided you a safe asylum - - -". Claimed - but only a claim like normal in the Quran.

115 8/29f: "- - - Allah is the Lord - - -". Often claimed, never proved. Not even his very existence is proved.

116 8/33a: "But Allah was not going to send them a Penalty whilst thou (Muslims*) wast amongst them - - -". - you, too, could be hurt. One of the weaker of Muhammad's ways of explaining away requests for proof of Allah and of his own claimed, but never proved connection to Allah; there is no problem for an omniscient and omnipotent god exactly to pick his victims. Also see 8/32-33 just above.

117 8/40c: "(Allah is*) - the Best to protect and the Best to help". Strongly contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the best one for this. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

118 8/41n: "For Allah hath power over all things". A power never really proved in case.

119 8/49c: "Allah is exalted in Might - - -". Two more of all the never proved or documented statements or claims the Quran is overflowing with. Use your brain and your knowledge, and not only your eyes and ears, and you will find lots of them - in the Quran and in the words from Islam and from Muslims. In this case it is told about often claimed, never proved might.

120 8/52e: "- - - Allah is strong - - -". Often claimed, never proved.

#121 8/63a: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in might - - -". One of the many never proved claims in the Quran. Just look for them - they are so many and so easy to see. Claims anyone can make on behalf of his god(s) free of charge - words are that cheap. If either the Bible or the Quran is correct about this, both Jesus and some of the older prophets in the Bible - at least Elisha /1.Kings 17/22 and 2. Kings 4/34-35), the disciple Peter (Acts 9/40) and even Paul (Acts 20/10) proved their connections to a god by resurrecting the dead, and many others by other miracles and/or real foretelling (a special kind of miracles). Muhammad was totally unable to prove anything at all - just claims and fast words. Even Islam (though not all Muslims) admits there exists no proofs for Allah - a main reason why Islam praises blind belief and scorns questions for proofs so much.

122 8/67d: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in might - - -". One of the many never proved claims in the Quran. Just look for them - they are so many and so easy to see. Claims anyone can do on behalf of his god(s) free of charge - words are that cheap. If either the Bible or the Quran is correct about this, both Jesus and some of the older prophets in the Bible and f.x. Peter and Paul proved their connections to a god by miracles and/or real foretelling (a special kind of miracles). Muhammad was totally unable to prove anything at all - just claims and fast words. Even Islam (though not all Muslims) admits there exists no proofs for Allah - a main reason why Islam praises blind belief and scorns questions for proofs so much.

123 9/39d: "For Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed, never proved. Reality or boasting?

124 9/40h: "- - - Allah is Exalted in might - - -". Often claimed, never proved.

125 9/71j: "- - - Allah is Exalted in power - - -". Often claimed, never really proved. Boasting?

126 9/79b: "- - - Allah will throw back their (some bad persons*) ridicule - - -". The old fact: Only possible if he exists and is something supernatural - plus that he is correctly described in the Quran - - - in contradiction to all the Quran's mistakes, etc.

127 9/129d: "- - - He (Allah*) the Lord of the Throne (of Glory) Supreme!" Yes - if the Quran is not a made up book, and if it speaks the truth. And if Allah exists - nothing of which is proved.

128 10/3g: "- - - (Allah*) is firmly established on the throne (of authority) - - -". Similar is often claimed, but never proved. Claims are very cheap, especially for a man even Islam admits did not respect truth very much if untruth or broken words gave a better result - and a man liking power, riches for bribes and more power - and women.

129 10/3h: "- - - (Allah is*) regulating and governing all things". See 10/3d just above. If there had been even one single proved case of Allah regulating anything at all throughout the times, Muslims had screamed about it.

130 10/3i: "No intercessor (can plead with Him (Allah*)) except after his leave hath been obtained)". One more never proved claim - and a claim in strict contradiction to the Bible and Yahweh.

131 10/10a: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) - - -". Similar claims many places in the Quran, but never a proof - only claims".132 10/22a: "It is He (Allah*) who enableth you to traverse (travel*) through land and sea - - -". No comments - and none should be necessary.

133 10/32a: "- - - Allah, your (peoples*) real Cherisher and Sustainer - - -". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere - and one of those cheap claims any religion can claim for their god(s) free of charge as long as they do not have to prove anything.

134 10/59b: "Hath Allah indeed permitted you (people*), or do ye invent (things) to attribute to Allah?" The underlying meaning is that only the Quran/Muhammad/Islam has the right rules. This may - may - be correct if Allah exists, is a major god, and the Quran has described him and his sometimes doubtful moral code correctly. (Though he in case is no good and benevolent god.)

135 10/65a: "- - - all power - - - belong to Allah - - -". Such power is often claimed in the Quran, but nowhere really documented.

136 10/65b: "- - - all - - - honor belong to Allah - - -". Please read 1/1a above and see if you agree.

137 11/4b: "(Allah*) hath power over all things". A claim which never was proved - like everything in the Quran and in Islam (for comparison: If either the Quran or the Bible is correct on this, Jesus proved his father's(?)/god's power and his own connection to something supernatural many times - Muhammad never).

138 11/52d: "- - - (Allah will*) add strength to your (Muslim's*) strength - - -". There never was documented such a case - lots of claims, but never a proved case.

139 11/56c: "There is not a moving creature, but He (Allah*) hath grasp in its forelock". = Allah directs it = the predestination once more: Allah decides everything. (To hold the forelocks is an Arab expression for that the one grasped has to obey whatever you decide. The universal god often uses Arab references, and like here references only Arabs understand if they are not explained. There seldom are similar references from other parts of the world - strange for a universal god who has had thousands of prophets all over the world during thousands of years according to the Quran.)

140 11/57b: "For my (Hud's*) Lord (Allah*) - - - watch over all things". See 2/233h above.

141 11/66a: "- - - thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) is the Strong One - - -". Often claimed, never proved.

142 11/66b: "- - - (Allah is*) Able to enforce His Will". Often claimed, never proved.

143 11/107d: "- - - (Allah*) is the (sure) Accomplisher of what He planneth". = Nothing can change Allah's predestined plan. (But why then f.x. pray to Allah when you have problems - it will change nothing, as nothing can change his predestination? And why go to a doctor, if Allah already has decided how your illness will end?)

144 12/21f: "And Allah hath full power and control over His (Allah's*) affairs - - -". Allah decides everything, and nothing can change his Plan. Full predestination.

145 12/39b: "- - - Allah, the One, Supreme and Irresistible - - -". Similar are frequently claimed in the Quran, but never proved anywhere. Besides: According to the Bible, only Yahweh is the supreme.

146 12/40e: "- - - the Command is for none but Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says the command is for Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

###147 12/107a: "Do they feel secure from the coming against them - - - the wrath of Allah - - -". Psychology - a rhetorical (leading) question leading up to an expected "no" as an answer - Muhammad understood people. But yes: So much is wrong, etc. in the Quran, that it is clear there is no god behind it. Muhammad does not get the answer he tried to pressure from us (and all others). There is no doubt that Islam is a made up religion.

Also (we quote): "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar are very often used.

##148 13/2b: “Allah is He Who raised the heavens (plural and wrong*) without any pillars that ye can see: - - -”. A Muslim information organization was in ca. 2007 asked to explain this sentence. They replied not 100% politely, that anyone with an IQ of 60 or more had to understand that this meant that the pillars did not exist. The person who asked, replied that he knew the difference between non-existent and invisible - the meaning in the sentence above is “invisible” - and asked them please to give him a real explanation. They never answered.

There exist no pillars - visible or invisible. And actually the idea is ridicules, as there exists no material heaven which needs to be kept in position - the heaven we see is just an optical illusion. Any god - even small ones - would know this, but Muhammad naturally not. Then who made the Quran?

Besides no man or animal or bird has ever banged into such an invisible pillar – and no airplane collided with one. Also see 31/10b below.

149 13/2e: "- - He (Allah*) is firmly established on the Throne (of Authority) - - -". Similar often claimed, but never proved. It also is contradicted by the Bible, which says it is Yahweh who has authority. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

150 13/2k: "He (Allah*) doth regulate all affairs - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that Yahweh regulates a lot - though not like in the Quran where the claimed god regulates absolutely everything, so that f.x. free will of man and the value of prayers or forgiving just are illusions, if the total predestination is true. And what is the situation if the claims about total predestination are not true? Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are taught that a question or problem which really can have only one valid solutions, can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. F.x. in cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. Islam teaches differently. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1): Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. Islam is teaching differently. 2): The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other. Islam is teaching differently.)

Another fact: Today it is easy by means of statistical methods to check if prayers have any effect. (Let f.x. 1ooo persons each pray for one among 1ooo unknown persons sick or in other ways in need. compare the result after some time with a similar group of 1ooo who has not been prayed for, and see if there is a difference. If there is a positive difference, this would be a strong indication or perhaps even a proof for something - a proof Islam strongly needs, as it has not any proof for a single of its central claims. But it has not even tried to make such a test. Why?)

151 13/9b: "He (Allah*) is the Great, the most High". Often claimed, never proved - and one of the many claims any believer in any religion can use on behalf of his/her gods free of charge, as long as no proof is required".

152 13/9c: "He (Allah*) is the Great, the most High". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh is on top. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

153 13/13c: "- - - His (Allah's*) power (supreme)!" It is in case a power he never unmistakably have shown.

154 13/16a: "Who is the Lord and Sustainer of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth? Say: '(It is) Allah". One more of the many undocumented claims in the Quran. Claims anyone in any religion can use on behalf of his or her god(s) free of charge. There are so many of these in the book and they are so easy to see, that it just is to go hunting for them and you will find more. Also see 11/7a above.

155 13/16b: "Who is the Lord and Sustainer of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth? Say: '(It is) Allah". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

156 13/16k: "He (Allah*) is the One, the Supreme and Irresistible." Similar often claimed, never proved - and like so much in the Quran it is claims any priest in any religion can make free of charge on behalf of his god(s) as long as no proofs are required - words are that cheap.

157 13/21: "- - - (that*) which Allah hath commanded - - -". This can only be true if Allah exists and has power.

158 13/31d: "- - - the command is with Allah in all things!" = Allah decides everything - we in reality are back to his claimed predestination and Plan.

159 13/33a: "- - - He (Allah*) Who standet over every soul - - -". Incompatible with the Bible - and also never proved (like everything else of central claims in the Quran).

160 13/34d: "- - - defender have they (non-Muslims*) none against Allah". The Bible contradicts this, at least for believers in Yahweh.

#####161 13/39a: "Allah doth blot out or confirm what He pleaseth - - -". If this refers to the claimed "mother book", this means that the book in case is not unabridged from eternity like some Muslims claim (not all). It is not an eternal one if it is changed. Islam is not eternal and unchangeable if the holy book is changeable. And there is no reason for Allah to revere - like Islam says - a book he can change as he pleases. If the claimed "Mother Book" can be changed, parts of the ground under Islam disappears - and every reason for that Allah should revere it if he is the maker or can change it at will. (And if it on top of all is not from any god - like all the errors, etc. in the book documents - all the ground under Islam disappears.)

162 13/41c: "(Where) Allah commands, there is none to put back his commands - - -". As Islam is a war and fascistic apartheid religion, we must hope some more benevolent god, f.x. Yahweh, may be able to do something.

163 14/1i: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, but not unmistakably proved one single time in 1400 years.

164 14/4f: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, never proved. If it had been proved even one single time in these 1400 years, it had been impossible not to know it - Muslims had told about it whenever there was a chance.

165 14/11e: "It is not for us (claimed earlier prophets*) to bring an authority except as Allah permits". Muhammad never was able to prove one atom of his central claims. Here in his tale the situation was the same for claimed former prophets = Muhammad's inability to prove anything was normal for prophets - at least this is Muhammad's not proved claim. Also see 9/98b above. But here he keeps an opening open: If Allah will. Which explains why some Jewish prophets included Jesus and even f.x. Paul made miracles - Allah did it (according to this verse).

166 14/20: "Nor is that for Allah any great matter." If he exists, and if the Quran has told the truth about him and his power.

167 14/21c: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". See 3/77b above.

168 14/27e: "Allah doeth what He willeth". Allah decides and predestines everything - and from other places in the Quran, we know he predestines according to his inflexible Plan which nobody and nothing can change.

169 14/47c: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, not one single time in 1400 years unmistakably proved. (Jesus and Yahweh at least proved both their existence and their powers if either the Bible or the Quran or both tell(s) the truth on this point.)

170 14/48d: "- - - Allah, the One, the Irresistible". Similar often claimed, but never proved - and words are cheap.

171 16/1b: "(Inevitable) commeth (to pass) the Command of Allah - - -". It is inevitable only:

  1. If Allah exists - but with all which is wrong in the Quran, also this may be wrong (Muhammad after all just took over a pagan god, al-Lah, and claimed he was not pagan).
  2. If Allah, in case he exists and is a major god, is correctly described in the Quran - again; with all which is wrong in the Quran, there might be mistakes also here, especially as all the mistakes make it clear that the book and hence the description is not made by a god, and perhaps even more so as Allah was a peaceful god as long as Muhammad was in Mecca, but became a war god when Muhammad started to gain power and needed warriors in Medina. ####The change in the god and in the religion in 622 - 624 AD is very striking, but never mentioned by Muslims or Islam. As the surahs from Mecca - some 85-90 - and the ones from Medina - some 22-28 (there are some one does not know the age of, though one believe one knows from which period), are mixed helter-skelter in the Quran, it is a bit difficult for readers who do not know the book well, to see this. But if you first read the surahs from Mecca, and then the ones from Medina separately, it is very easy to see this change from a peaceful to a war religion. And the point here is: An eternal god cannot change that much in just 1-2 years from Muhammad's arrival in Medina. At least one of the descriptions has to be wrong. Which of the descriptions - if any - is correct? Mecca and peaceful? - or Medina and blood and stealing and rape and terror? (There is a list over which surahs are from Mecca and which from Medina in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran".)
  3. If the Quran's claims about total predestination are correct (but in that case man has no free will, no matter what the Quran says about this - there are some of the immaterial laws which are impossible to break even for omnipotent gods.)

172 16/1c: "(Inevitable) commeth (to pass) the Command of Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that the only beings whose firm decisions are inevitable is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

173 16/1g: "- - - far is He (Allah*) above having the partners (likely the other gods of the pagan Arabs, but non-Arab gods and Jesus may be included*) they (the pagan Arabs and perhaps the Jews and Christians*) ascribe unto Him (Allah*)!" Is Allah far above anything at all if the Quran is a made up book - and Allah perhaps a made up god?

According to the Bible he at least is not above Yahweh. And Allah is above nothing if he just is a pagan, made up god.

174 16/12a: "- - - the Night and the Day; the Sun and the Moon; and the Stars are in subjection by His (Allah's*) Command - - -". Similar is claimed many times in the Quran, but never proved. One of those easy, seemingly impressive claims any believer can make on behalf of any god and religion, as long as no proof is necessary. It is valid nothing neither as a sign nor as a proof, until it is proved that it really is Allah who is behind it. Also see 11/7a above.

175 16/14: “It is He Who has made the sea subject - - -”. Also the sea Muhammad claims for his claimed god - without anything to show for himself but empty words any priest in any religion can use for a "proof" for his pantheon.

##176 16/40: "- - - to anything which We (Allah*) willed, We but could say the Word 'Be' and it is." Allah can predestine or create anything just by saying it - and by the way: ######He also just could say: "Be a son, and Jesus was" (no female necessary).

177 16/60c: "- - - to Allah applies the highest similitude - - -". Words are cheap. But by the way: Higher than to Yahweh?"

178 16/60d: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed but never unmistakably shown.

179 16/70d: "- - - Allah is - - - All-Powerful". Often claimed - never once in 1400 years unmistakably proved.

180 16/77d: "- - - Allah hath power over all things". Often claimed - never unmistakably proved. Not once in 1400 years.

181 16/80a: "It is Allah Who made your habitations homes of rest and quiet for you - - -(etc.*)". Quite similar to 11/7a above.

182 16/98a: "- - - seek Allah's protection - - -". For what it is worth if he does not exist - not to mention if he exists, but is part of the dark forces (with all those errors in the Quran, he is not a god if he is behind that book - and parts of the book and f.x. parts of its moral code may indicate the dark forces, if they exist).

183 17/23a: "Thy (peoples'*) Lord (Allah*) hath decreed - - -". This does not matter unless Allah exists and is a major god.

184 17/43b: "He (Allah*) is high above all that they say! - Exalted and Great (beyond measure)!" We may remind you that when you read the Quran, you should read the claims, deeds, etc., not the glorious words. The demands and deeds and introduced rules are reliable - the glorious words are cheap and may be propaganda. Read 1/1a above and see if you agree to this verse.

185 17/43c: "He (Allah*) is high above all that they say! - Exalted and Great (beyond measure)!" Similar often claimed, never proved.

186 17/65b: "- - - enough is thy (Muhammad's/Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) for a Disposer of affairs", Yes, but only if he exists and has power - and preferably do not belong to the dark forces.

187 17/99f: "Only He (Allah*) has (the power to - - -*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that Yahweh, not Allah, is the ruler over the Day of Doom. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

#188 18/13a: “We (Allah*) relate to thee (Muhammad/Muslims*) their (the 7 sleepers) story in truth: - - -”. No omniscient god related a story like this claiming it to be true, neither to Muhammad, nor to anybody else.

##Actually this is quite a joke: A well known and made up fairy tale is the claimed truth and a claimed proof for Allah and his power!

189 18/14a: "Our ("the 7 sleepers"*) Lord (here intended to be Allah*) is the Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the real ruler. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

190 18/26f: "- - - nor does He (Allah*) share His Command with any other person whatsoever". No, but what about other gods? Even if we omit every other god, there still remains the question of Yahweh - the old Jewish and Christian god whom Muhammad admitted and confirmed existed. As his try to explain that he was the same god as Allah is wrong - too different religions (which cannot be explained away by claims of a falsified Bible, as both science and Islam has proved that also this claim is wrong), there has to be some other explanation.

191 18/27g: "- - - and none wilt thou find as a refuge other than Him (Allah*)". This will depend entirely on how truthful the Quran is. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) If it is telling the full truth and only the truth, and if Allah really exists, this may be correct. If not, there either is no god anywhere - everything is made up. Or there is/are one or more gods somewhere - and we f.x. here are back to the fact that Muhammad accepted the existence of Yahweh - though he tried to make one god out his own Allah and the Jewish and Christian Yahweh. The situation grows extra interesting if Allah does not exist - which seems very likely, as there never was any proof for him, after he suddenly appeared 1400 years ago in 610 AD (well, he existed as a Pagan god some time before that) - a god ought to have a longer life - and as there also never was any kind of manifestation of him or any other kinds of proofs, only words and claims, and on top of all all those lose claims and words without exception came from a man believing in the use of lies (al-Taqiyya, Kitman, Hilah) and broken promises included broken oaths, deceptions ("war is deceit"), and a man who used his religion (like many false prophets) to gain power and women. Not to mention that all the mistakes, etc. in the book tell a lot.

192 18/39b: "There is no power but with Allah". This may be correct if Allah exists - no proof or unmistakable indication for this has ever been seen - if he is behind the Quran, and if the Quran in addition is truthful. Besides: If there are other gods - f.x. Yahweh - it is not true. (Very much is wrong in the Quran - perhaps also this claim).

193 18/44a: "- - - the (only) protection comes from Allah - - -". See 18/39b above.

194 18/44b: "- - - the (only) protection comes from Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that Yahweh is a good protector - and does not know about Allah, etc. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

195 18/45c: "- - - it is (only ) Allah Who prevails over all things". See 28/39b below.

*196 19/18c: “- - - I (Mary, mother of Jesus*) seek refuge from thee to (Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah”. It is highly unlikely that a Jew - and especially one working in Yahweh's temple (though this is another piece of contradiction to the Bible in the Quran, as she lived in Nazareth according to the Bible, days away from Jerusalem (Luke 1/26-27) - should seek refuge from a then highly polytheistic god from another country. As one see from what happened to Jesus, the monotheism and Yahweh were strong in Israel at that time. If the Quran had been telling the truth when it tells that Mary was working in the Temple, it is absolutely impossible - she had got into serious troubles if she addressed any other god than Yahweh (but then the Quran most likely is wrong also on this point - We have found nothing about Mary working in the Temple in the Bible or any other source, and if it had been true, most or all Christian sources had mentioned it, as it would mean one more connection between Jesus and Yahweh. (Actually it is incorrect that she worked in the Temple. This legend is taken from the apocryphal - made up - “’proto gospel’ after Jacob” - - - but Muslims all the same tell that the differences between the Quran and the Bible is because the bad non-Muslims have falsified the latter one – not because Muhammad ever so often used twisted fairy tales as basis for stories in the Quran.) Our Muslim sources also do not mention if there exists any other reliable source for this story in the Quran - which Islam frequently does not do when they have no sources, only statements built on nothing or, like here, on what legends and stories and fairy tales the story-tellers told in long evenings. Her work in the Temple simply is a fairy tale shined up and used like a true story in the Quran (this even more so as out sources tell that all workers in the Temple were men) - by Allah or by Muhammad, and presumably sent down from Allah and copy from the Mother Book in Heaven, a book perhaps made by Allah, but most likely - according to Islam - never made, but existed from eternity (impossible as angels are speaking at least one place in the book - it must be made after the first angels were created. Not to mention that Muhammad speaks some 9 places in the book (1/1-7, 2/286c, 6/104c, 6/114, 11/2b, 19/36b, 27/91a, 42/10a and 51/50-51a + likely 16/63, 84/15-16)).

One more point: Like mentioned ONLY men worked in the Temple, and only men from the Levi tribe. Mary was a woman and from the Judah (David's) tribe.

You are free to believe this quote from 19/18 if you want.

197 19/35c: "- - - He (Allah*) only says to it, 'Be', and it is." May be Yahweh only said "Be", and Jesus was.

198 19/65a: "(Allah is*) Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and of the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved - one of the many never documented claims in the Quran any believer in any religion can make on behalf of his/her god(s) free of charge, as long as any claim for proof can be evaded, as words are that cheap.

199 19/65b: "(Allah is*) Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and of the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible which says it is Yahweh who is this lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words, like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

200 19/87a: "None shall have the power of intercession (on the Day of Doom*), but such a one who has received permission (or promise) from (Allah) Most Gracious. Remarks:

  1. This contradicts the places in the Quran flatly stating that no-one can intercede at that day.
  2. Muhammad had got such permission already - one of his points of power; "better be friends with him, so he can intercede for us".
  3. And there remain the question about Yahweh. He exists also according to the Quran (though Muhammad wrongly claims he is the same god as Allah) - and if the Quran and/or the Bible tell(s) the truth, he has proved his power, something Allah absolutely not have done - there only are big words from a man wanting power and believing in al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), etc., broken promises, even sworn ones, and cheating ("War is deceit").

201 19/94: "He (Allah*) does take an account of them (all), and hath numbered them (all) (all beings*) exactly." Allah decides everything and has everything predestined. Like so much in the Quran a not proved claim.

202 20/5b: "(Allah) Most Gracious is firmly established on the throne (of authority)". Frequently claimed like this or in other ways, but never one single valid proof for it - only Muhammad's never documented words. And even Islam describes Muhammad as a doubtful character, if you look away from all the glorious propaganda words, and judge from what he in reality demanded and did - words are cheap, deeds are reliable.

203 20/5c: "(Allah) Most Gracious is firmly established on the throne (of authority)". Contradicted by the Bible which says that there sits Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

204 20/114a: “High above all is Allah, the King, the Truth!” Allah as shown in the Quran at best represents partly truth and partly mistakes. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) And does he even exist?

205 20/114b: “High above all is Allah, the King, the Truth!” Contradicted by the Bible, which says this is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

206 21/22e: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Throne - - -". One of the hundreds of never proved claims - mostly cheap claims any believer in any religion can claim for his god(s) as long as he can evade requests for proofs.

207 21/22f: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Throne - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that on the Throne you find Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always uses instead of proofs.

208 21/42a: "Who can keep you safe by night and by day from the (wrath of) (Allah) Most Gracious)?" This anyone can do if Allah just is a character in a made up book. If Allah after all happens to exist and is a god, the answer will depend on how many gods exist, and on Allah's strength compared to possible others. Unlike the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh (according to the Bible and - wrongly claimed to be the same god as Allah - also according to the Quran) proved his existence and power, but Allah not. And if Allah is from the dark forces - like f.x. many pints in the Quran and also f.x. in its moral code may indicate - we will have to hope any god is stronger than him.

209 21/79e: “- - - it was Our (Allah’s*) power that made the hills - - - celebrate Our (Allah's) praise - - -.” Hills express no feelings or anything – they are totally inanimate. Simply animism - normally found in primitive religions and fairy tales. Not from the Bible.

210 21/79f: “- - - it was Our (Allah’s*) power that made the hills and the birds celebrate Our (Allah's) praise - - -.” Hills express no feelings or anything – they are totally inanimate. Animism. Birds? In old times religious people claimed they sang to praise God - or Allah or gods. But science has long since found that the reasons for their songs are more prosaic – mainly to declare their territory and/or to attract mates. Besides they do not have the brain power for abstract thinking like praising a god. Animism and anthropomorphism in one verse - things normally found in primitive religions and in fairy tales.

211 21/79h: "- - - it was We (Allah*) who did (all these things)". Similar often claimed, but never proved. Also: Not dissimilar to 11/7a above.

212 21/81a: "(- - - Our (Allah's*) power - - -)". This often claimed power is nowhere documented or in other ways proved or clearly demonstrated - not one single time in 1400 years. The best proof for this, is Islam's silence about such a proof - not one single word ever.

213 21/92b: "- - - I (Allah*) am your (people's*) Lord and Cherisher - - -". Often claimed, never proved. And the claims are from a not reliable man who had much to gain on making people believe this.

214 22/5e: "- - - in order that We (Allah*) might manifest (Our power) to you - - -". There is nowhere in or outside the Quran manifested anything about Allah's claimed power, for the simple reason that there nowhere is proved that Allah really is behind what is claimed to be a manifestation or sign or proof for his claimed power. It even is nowhere proved Allah exists - Muhammad on top of that took him over from a pagan religion. This makes all such claims in the Quran just that: claims.

215 22/6d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who has power over all things". Often claimed, not once in 1400 years clearly proved.

216 22/6e: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who has power over all things". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh, not Allah is the really powerful one. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

217 22/18h: "- - - for Allah carries out all He wills". Predestination and Allah's Plan which no-one can change. Similar to 22/14d above. Also see 3/154 and 14/22b above.

218 22/37b "He (Allah*) has thus made them (animals*) subject to you (people*) - - -".See 11/7a above.

219 22/39d: "- - - Allah is Most Powerful - - -". A power often claimed, but never really proved. Hot air only?

220 22/39e: "- - - Allah is Most Powerful for their (Muslims*) aid - - -". This is a claim you frequently meet in the surahs from Medina and in the war religion Islam there developed into: Allah is powerful and will help you in battles - aiding you f.x. with thousands of angels of war.

VERY different from NT. And remember: Both science and - against their wish - Islam thoroughly have proved that the Bible, included NT, is not falsified, in spite of Muhammad's - like normal - never proved claims about this. It may be true or not true, but it is not falsified.

Interesting here may be that according to the Quran, the OT cannot have been falsified until after the death of Jesus - the good Muslim Jesus had spoken up in case. There were young scriptures from the Pharisees he spoke up against, but not the ones from what is now OT. That means there were no falsifications until after 33 AD. But from the Qumran papers one has the whole or parts of all the "books" in OT except Ester - identical to the present OT except for minor details/variations normal for handwritten books. These are from 50 - 150 BC or older. The only possible conclusion: The OT is not falsified - the Quran's claim concerning this is wrong. When it comes to NT, also there the oldest known copies - f.x. the Chester Beatty Papyrus II from ca. 100 AD and the so-called John Rydland Manuscript from ca. 130 AD are like what you see in the present Bible. (Remember hare that the claims about a falsified Bible often claim the falsification was done in connection to the meeting in Nicaea in 325 AD). There was no reason for falsifying Arabia or a prophet from there out from the Bible, until after 610 AD, when a man there suddenly claimed to be a prophet with a very different religion.

221 22/40k: "- - - Allah is Full of Strength, Exalted in Might - - -". This power of Allah is often claimed, but never reliably proved.

222 22/62d: "- - - verily, Allah is He, Most High, Most Great". Beautiful words - but never proved, and words are cheap, even superlatives. It definitely is no proved verity/truth. By the way: Superlatives often are used in propaganda - for one thing they look superb, and for another thing they cost nothing - - - just ask any politician or self proclaimed prophet or businessman or others hunting for power or riches. Also see 1/1a above.

223 22/62e: "- - - verily, Allah is He, Most High, Most Great". We are back to the disturbing, but relevant question about Yahweh.

224 22/74b: "- - - Allah is He Who is strong and able to carry out His Will." A claim many times repeated, but never demonstrated.

225 22/78m: "- - - (Allah is*) the Best to protect and the Best to help!". In all the history of Islam, there exists not one single really proved case of protection by Allah, and not one single really proved case of help from Allah. Guess if Islam had told you, if such a case had existed!

226 23/18b: "- - - We (Allah*) certainly are able to drain it (water*) off (with ease)". Allah or nature? See 11/7a above.

227 23/29: "- - - Thou (here indicated to be Allah*) art the Best to enable (us) to disembark". Once more: According to the Bible the god involved was Yahweh, not Allah.

228 23/52c: "- - - I (Allah*) am your (the prophets'*) Lord and Cherisher - - -". Wrong - see 23/52b just above - unless Islam brings solid proofs for their undocumented - like always - claim. He may have been Muhammad’s god or made up god, but he was not the god of the Biblical prophets, included Jesus - too much is different in the teachings and the traditions. Compare f.x. the teachings of Jesus and Muhammad yourself - they are so different that they are not even of the same planet.

229 23/72d: "He (Allah*) is the Best of those who give sustenance". Well, there is the always recurring question: Yahweh?

*230 23/86a: “Who is the Lord of the seven heavens - - -?” Wrong. There are no 7 heavens (and remember: They had to be material ones, because according to the Quran, the stars are fastened to the lowest heaven (37/6-7, 41/12), and you can fasten nothing to something non-material). All the same you find these claims about 7 heavens/firmaments/tracts in 2/29d+e, 17/44a, 23/17a, 23/86a, 41/12a+b, 65/12a, 67/3a+b and 71/15a+b - all together the Quran mentions "heavens" in plural at least 199 times; there is no doubt the Quran means there are 7 heavens (and as the stars are fastened to the lowermost of them - f.x. 67/5a - they have to be material ones - if not the stars could not be fastened to it). In 67/3 you also are told they are places one above the other, which means they of course are built successively higher above the Earth - which also is clear from most places in the Quran where the place of the heavens are indicated. Some modern Muslims try to place the heavens in space, deep space included. But among others 67/3 prohibits this, as "up" and "down" ("one above the other") has no meaning as part of the real space.

By the way: 67/12b also claims there are 7 Earths, and gives their names according to Islam.

It is some irony to see such a huge scientific mistake used as verification for Allah. And it is not the only time a "proof" for Allah simply is scientifically wrong.

We may add that each time Muhammad uses wrong science or other wrong facts as indication or "proof" for something, we find it a little ironic and amusing.

A final point: This is a rhetoric question. We remind you that NB: According to psychologists you should be careful when somebody uses rhetorical questions for arguments, because such questions very often indicate that they lack real arguments or real facts. They warn that such methods often are used by deceivers. We quote: "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar - and "surely" - are very often used.

231 23/86b: "- - - the Lord (indicated Allah*) of the Throne (of Glory) Supreme - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which means Yahweh is the one and supreme power, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

232 23/88c: "Who is it in Whose hands is the governance of all things - - -". The intended answer to this rhetoric question is "Allah". But the Bible instead answers "Yahweh".

233 23/116a: “Therefore exalted be Allah, the King, the Reality - - -“. If there is one thing which is not proved in Islam, it is the reality of Allah. Everything in the religion rests only on blind belief in a tale told by a man with very dubious moral, but a strong wish for power and for wealth for bribes - - - and women – a man using his religion as his platform of power (like many others). And a self proclaimed prophet unable to make prophesies (= a stolen or “borrowed” title).

234 24/44a: “It is Allah Who alternates the Night and the Day - - -“. It is nature which alternates night and day – but words are cheap, and any religion can tell it is their god(s) who does it. Islam will have to produce proofs for that it really is Allah who makes the Earth spin around in the light from the sun – the reason for the alternation. Muhammad here is contradicted by astronomical realities. But Islam rarely proves anything – only claims. And Islam also has Al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie. No other of the big religions has it.

235 24/45e: "- - - Allah hat power over all things". Often claimed, never once in the entire history and prehistory clearly proved.

236 25/54b: "- - - thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) has power over all (things)". Often claimed, never proved. One of the many claims any priest in any religion can make on behalf of his god(s) as long as he does not have to prove anything.

237 25/59c: "- - - (Allah*) is firmly established on the Throne (of authority) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that throne belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

238 26/9b: "- - - (Allah is*) - - - the Exalted in Might - - -". A might often claimed, but never proved in or outside the Quran. Not once.

239 26/23b: "- - - the Lord (intended to mean Allah*) and Cherisher of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". The Jews did not reckon their god to be for all and everything, only for the Jews (though a couple of places it is indicated also in OT that Yahweh is for the world). Islam will have to document that Moses said this to Ramses II (or perhaps - perhaps - to his successor Merneptah). It also is not in the Bible.

240 26/68b: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". Perhaps, but in case he has never clearly shown it (besides - the story with Moses according to the Bible was about Yahweh's miracles, and Yahweh and Allah are so different, that they cannot be the same god - at least Islam will have to prove it, not only give lose words for it).

241 26/98a: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) -- -". Often claimed, never proved - not even Allah's very existence is proved.

242 26/98b: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Worlds - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

243 26/104b: "(Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". See f.x. 26/68b above.

244 26/109c: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) -- -". Often claimed, never proved - not even Allah's very existence is proved.

245 26/140b: "(Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". But during 1400 years there was not one single proof for that claimed might - only claims based on the words of a man with doubtful moral and who on top of that liked power and was not adverse to lying (f.x. "Miracles will make no-one believe anyhow"), and deception (f.x. "War is deception"), ad not to mention even disuse of words/promises/oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah can cheat, cheating is ok - but how much cheating is it then in the Quran? - by Allah or by Muhammad).

246 26/145d: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Often claimed in the Quran, never documented anywhere. Words are cheap.

247 26/145e: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

248 26/159b: "(Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

249 26/164d: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Often claimed in the Quran, never documented. Words are cheap.

350 26/164e: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Contradicted by the Bible, which says the lord is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

251 26/180d: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Often claimed in the Quran, never documented. Words are cheap.

252 26/180e: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Contradicted by the Bible, which says the lord is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

253 26/191b: "(Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -." Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

254 26/192c: “- - - (Allah is*) Lord of the Worlds.” Often claimed in the Quran, never documented anywhere. Words are cheap.

255 27/8d: "- - - (Allah - *) the Lord of the Worlds". Often claimed, never proved. Words are cheap.

256 27/8e: "- - - (Allah - *) the Lord of the Worlds". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that the Lord is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

257 27/63g: "- high is Allah above what (other gods*) they associate with Him!" If he exists. And if the Quran tells the truth on this point. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) Not to mention: If he is not one of them.

258 27/63h: "- high is Allah above what (other gods*) they associate with Him!" Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the highest - may be because they do not associate two so different gods with each other - - - and actually does not even believe in other gods than Yahweh. (Only Muslims mix those two - they have to to have an old religion - - - and because if not there are more mistakes in the Quran to gloss over.) Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

259 28/30d: "Verily, I am Allah the Lord of the Worlds..." Often claimed in the Quran, but never proved. On the other hand the Bible claims it was Yahweh - another god with fundamentally another teaching - who was speaking. Yahweh has proved himself if the Quran and/or the Bible speaks the truth on this point, Allah not.

260 28/68e: "And far is He (Allah*) above the partners they ascribe (to Him)". If he is a real god and there are no other gods: Yes. If he is made up: No.

261 28/68f: "And far is He (Allah*) above the partners they ascribe (to Him)" There also is the question about Yahweh. No believer in Yahweh - at least none who also have studied the Quran some - recons Yahweh to be a "partner" of Allah - a god beside Allah. He is instead of Allah. And what then about Islam? - especially if Allah does not exist or belongs to the dark forces?

262 28/70e: "- - - for Him (Allah*) is the command - - -". Similar claims are often made in the Quran and by Muslims, but never proved anywhere. The only basis for the claim, is a book full of mistakes, contradictions, etc. based only on the word of a man believing in al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), etc., plus deceit ("War is deceit" - and "everything" is jihad/holy war), and the breaking of words/promises/oaths according to the Quran itself (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah can cheat, cheating is ok - but how much is then cheating in the Quran?) - a man liking power and riches for bribes - - - and women.

263 29/19d: "- - - that is easy for Allah". Often claimed, never proved. Claims are cheap.

264 29/20e: "- - - Allah has power over all things". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

265 29/20f: "- - - Allah has power over all things". Contradicted by the Bible, which says this power it is Yahweh who has - a book which not at all even mentions the claimed god Allah or his followers or his somewhat special "moral" codes. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

266 29/42c: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted (in power) - - -". Well, in case he has never clearly proved his power.

267 30/4b: "With Allah is the decision, in the Past and in the Future - - -". Allah decides everything - predestination. (As for the number of years in this case, see 30/2-4 just above).

268 30/4c: "With Allah is the decision, in the Past and in the Future - - -". Often claimed, never proved - and may be f.x. Yahweh wants a word - if he exists (if the old books tell the truth on this point, there are some indications for his existence - there are none for Allah's (only claims)).

269 30/5c: "- - - He (Allah*) is exalted in Might - - -". He in case never has proved his might.

270 30/27e: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Might - - -". A might he in case never has proved.

271 30/40h: "And High is He (Allah*) above the partners they (non-Muslims) attribute (to Him)!" At least this is the Quran's claim - but a never proved claim, like most claims in the Quran. Any priest in any religion easily can claim just the same about his god(s), if claims are all which is needed.

272 30/48a: "It is Allah Who sends the wind - - -", See f.x. 11/7a or 30/27a above.

###273 30/48b: “- - - then does He (Allah*) spread them (the clouds*) in the sky as he wills, and break them into fragments, until thou seest raindrops issue from the midst thereof - - -”. It is not possible to get it more wrong than this. What happens is not that the clouds break apart to raindrops, but straight opposite: That droplets come together to form drops. No further comments. But ANY god had known better. Then who made the Quran? Also see 16/65 – 25/49 – 30/24 – 36/33 – 50/11.

274 30/50e: "- - - He (Allah*) has power over all things". We have not counted, but we think similar claims are to be found at least 100 places in the Quran alone. But not one single place inside or outside the Quran do you find even the smallest real proof for this claim. No place and never in the entire history or prehistory.

275 30/54e: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who have all knowledge and power". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that this belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

276 30/54f: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who have all - - - power". See f.x. 11/7a and 30/27e above.

277 31/9c: "He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". Perhaps, but he has never showed it.

278 31/16d: "- - - Allah will bring it forth - - -". This only is possible - possible - if Allah exists, and in addition is something with supernatural power - white or dark.

279 31/27d: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power - - -". Perhaps, but in case he never clearly has shown his power.

280 31/29a: "Seest thou(Muhammad/people*) not that Allah merges Night into Day and He merges Day into Night - - -". If Islam does not prove - not claim or state, but prove - the opposite, it is nature which does this - one of the many natural phenomena Muhammad claimed for his god without any documentation or anything - - - just like any believer in any religion can do on behalf of his god(s). Words are that cheap. Also see 11/7a above.

281 31/29c: “- - - He (Allah*) has subjected the sun and the moon (to His Law) - - -“. A nice proof for Allah - - - but only if it is proved that it really is he who moves them in their trajectories - and he who has made the laws of nature. Without such proofs, these just are cheap words in a valueless claim anyone can use totally free of charge – for Allah or for any other god, real or invented.

282 31/30g: "- - - Allah - He is Most High, Most Great". Similar claims you find many places in the Quran, but you never find a proof - inside or outside the book.

283 31/32a: "- - - when He (Allah*) has delivered them (some persons*) safely to land - - -". Not possible unless Allah exists and is something supernatural - white or black.

284 32/2f: “- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the Worlds (plural and wrong).” Often claimed, never proved. It is not even proved that Allah is reality.

285 32/2g: “- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the Worlds (plural and wrong).” Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord of the world, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

286 32/4d: "- - - firmly established Himself (Allah*) on the Throne (of authority) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is placed there, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

287 32/5a: "He (Allah*) rules (all) affairs - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it is Yahweh who does this, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

288 32/22d: "- - - his Lord (Allah*) - - -". Allah is the lord of no-one if he does not exist and definitely not of followers of Yahweh, if Yahweh exists.

But remember that if Allah in reality belongs to the dark forces - many points in the Quran may indicate this - he can be the lord of many.

289 32/24b: "And We (Allah*) appointed, from among them (the Jews*), leaders - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that the involved god was Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

290 33/2d: "- - - thy Lord (Allah*) - - -". Allah is nobody's lord unless he exists and is something supernatural (but beware that he can be somebody's lord if he exists, even if he belongs to the dark forces).

291 33/3c: "- - - (Allah is*) a Disposer of all affairs". Allah decides everything - predestines everything.

292 33/19f: "- - - that is easy for Allah". Similar claims you find several places in the Quran - but not one time a proved case.

293 33/25e: "And Allah is Full of Strength, Able to enforce His Will". Why then has he not one single time showed so? Not one single time in the entire history has he clearly showed his power. Yahweh showed his power many a time according to the Bible - claims which are confirmed in the Quran in connections to some of the old Jewish prophets, included Jesus (though the Quran wrongly mixes Yahweh up with Allah in the Quran - the two are fundamentally too different to be the same one). But Allah never one single time.

294 33/27c: ""And Allah hath power over all things". Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved. Allah also sometimes is used - like here - to justify immoral, injustice, and inhumanities.

295 33/30d: "- - - and that is easy for Allah". One of the very many claims in the Quran which never was or is proved.

296 33/37h: "And Allah's command must be fulfilled". If he is a god and exists, this is a matter of course. But how to know what are Allah's demands, when it is clear that the Quran is not from Allah? - no god makes that many mistakes, contradictions, etc.

297 33/48d: "For enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs". If he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth about him.

#298 33/48e: "For enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs". Muslims - who are presumed to really believe in the Quran - should remember this before using inhuman punishment for religious mistakes or sins.

299 34/23f: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Most High, Most Great". Similar is often claimed, but never proved.

300 34/23g: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Most High, Most Great". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that position belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

301 34/26f: "- - - He (Allah*) is the One to decide - - -". Allah decides and predestines everything - then where is the free will of man?

302 34/27c: "- - - He is Allah, the Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly has demonstrated that power.

303 35/1h: "- - - Allah has power over all things". Perhaps - but he has never in a clear way shown he claimed power. Never. Yahweh has if either the Bible or the Quran tells the truth about this, but never Allah. (In spite of Islam's claims those two gods are not the same one, as the teachings are too different, and as science has proved that the handy, but never documented way out Muslims always use - the claim that the Bible is falsified - is wrong.

304 35/2b: "What Allah - - - doth bestow on mankind there is none that can withhold: what He doth withhold, there is none can grant - - -". Allah decides.

305 35/2c: "What Allah - - - doth bestow on mankind there is none that can withhold: what He doth withhold, there is none can grant - - -". This is true only if Allah exists, if he is a major god, if there is no other god - f.x. Yahweh (whom the Quran admits exists, though they wrongly mix him up with Allah) - and if the Quran describes him and his power correctly - in a book full of mistakes, etc.

Besides the Bible tells that only Yahweh is almighty.

306 35/9a: "It is Allah Who sends forth the Winds, (etc.*) - - -". See 11/7a above.

307 35/9c: "- - - and We (Allah*) drive them (the clouds*) - - -". Only possible if Allah exists and is something supernatural - but also see 11/7a above.

308 35/9d: “- - - and revive the earth therewith (with rain) after its death - - -”. Land that can be revived by only adding rain is not dead. It is alive with seeds and perhaps roots. Also see 11/7a above.

309 35/10a: "- - - to Allah belong all glory and power". Two more of the many never proved claims in the Quran.

310 35/10b: "- - - to Allah belong all glory and power". Contradicted by the Bible, which says this belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

311 35/10d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who exalts each Deed of Righteousness". Yet another of the many never proved claims in the Quran - words are cheap, but not even Allah's existence is proved.

312 35/11h: "All this is easy to Allah". Often claimed, never proved.

313 35/13a: “He (Allah*) merges Night into Day, and he merges Day into Night - - -“. The alternation between day and night happens because the Earth spins around, swimming in the sunshine in space. Muhammad very often takes natural phenomena and calls them proofs/signs for/from Allah. It is untrue unless Islam first really proves both that this is done by a god, and that this god is Allah. But Islam proves nothing essential – it only claims and states and demands blind and naïve belief without documentation - - - even in the face of solid proofs for that something is very wrong.

314 35/13b: "- - - He (Allah*) has subjected the sun and the moon (to His Law) - - -". An easy claim, but like normal for the Quran not a proof.

315 35/17: "Nor is that (at all) difficult for Allah". Often claimed, never proved.

316 35/27a: "- - - Allah sends down rain from the sky - - -". Muhammad often took natural phenomena and claimed it was Allah who made it. Not one single of these claims was ever proved, in spite of many requests for proofs for Allah and for Muhammad's connection to a god. Muhammad demanded proofs from everybody else (which means that he reckoned proofs to be essential), but never was able to prove any of his central claims himself. Also see 11/7a above.

317 35/27b: "With it (rain*) We (Allah*) then bring out produce of various colors". See 11/7a above.

318 35/31f: "- - - Allah is assuredly - - - well acquainted and fully Observant". If he exists, if he has the power of a god, and if he is correctly described in the Quran.

#319 35/41a: "It is Allah Who sustains the heavens (plural and wrong) the earth - - -". We have till now not seen one Islamic try to explain this sentence which is not either un-scientific, trying to adjust the text to modern scientific reality, which is not possible if you look at the whole book, or fast, but lose talk. Also see 11/7a above.

320 35/44e: "(Allah*) is - - - All-Powerful". Well, he has never clearly showed his power - till now it is all ONLY words.

321 36/25: "- - - the Lord (Allah*) of you all - - -". Often claimed, never proved.

322 36/38a: “And the sun runs his course for a period determined to him - - -”. The sun runs no course as related to the Earth, though that was the accepted astronomy of that time. It is the Earth which revolves – around itself and around the sun. See 36/38c+d+e below.

Scientifically wrong, but correct belief at the time of Muhammad. Who made the Quran?

323 36/68a: "If We (Allah*) grant a long life to any - - -". Not possible unless Allah exists and is something supernatural - white or black.

324 36/72: "- - - We (Allah*) have subjected them (cattle, etc.*) to their (people's*) (use) - - -". See 11/7a and 36/71a above.

325 36/79c: "He (Allah*) will give them (humans*) life Who created them for the first time!" See 6/2b, 11/7a and 21/56c above.

###326 36/82b: "Verily, when He (Allah*) intends a thing, His Command is 'Be', and it is!" It is not for mere humans to speculate about why a god might want company, but if the god for some reason did want it, he according to the Quran just could say "Be a son" and Jesus was. This as a comment to Muslims' - and the Quran's - repeated question about how the god could have a son when he had no consort. (Besides in the very old Hebrew religion there also was a female deity - the male god's Amat. (Source "New Scientist" and others). Thus Jesus well could have been created "the natural way" if that is necessary for gods. The Amat was over time forgotten - the strictly masculine society of the old Hebrews did not respect a female, even not a female deity.)

327 37/5a: "Lord (Allah*) of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth, and all between them - - -". A standard, but never proved - not even a good, clear indication - Islamic claim, and a claim any believer in any religion can make to glorify his god free of charge as long as he flees from proving anything.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

###328 37/6b: “We (Allah*) have indeed decked the lower heaven (in) stars - - -”. The Quran tells this in some varieties some places in the book: The stars are fastened to the lowest (37/6-7, 41/12) of the 7 heavens (which also means that the heavens have to be made from something material - if not it was not possible to fasten the stars there). The stars also are lower than the moon, as other places in the Quran tell that the moon are in between the heavens - in addition to that it here is said the stars are fastened to the lowest heaven, and as also the moon was fasten to a heaven according to the astronomy of that time, in addition to that the Quran tells it is between the heavens, it has to be higher than the lowest heaven. The mistake actually is borrowed from Greek and/or Persian astronomy at the time of Muhammad (a fact mistake - any baby god had known better. Muslims generally tries to evade questions about this - or give you a lot of diffuse words (and never tell it is from local, wrong astronomy)). We have hardly ever seen a reasonable – not correct, but at least logically reasonable - explanation of this mistake, except the standard one when something is so wrong that even “explanations” are not possible: It is “figurative”, "allegorical” - or something similar - explanations or stories.

###329 37/6c: “We (Allah*) have indeed decked the lower heaven with - - - stars - - -”. The nature has produced billions of stars - of which man with his naked eyes is able to see 6ooo-7ooo. But in no way he used them to deck a non-existing lower heaven (below the moon according to the astronomy of that time - - - and to the Quran as the moon is "between the heavens") - and neither do nature use the stars as weapons (shooting stars) to chase away evil spirits or jinns like in the Quran, next verse (37/7). Also if the stars - suns - were below the moon, Earth had been pretty hot (in addition to all other nonsense this verse would imply if it had been true, compared to the reality). Is this a proof for that nature knows what it is doing, whereas Muhammad was bluffing?

Actually it is not 100% correct to say that Muhammad told everything about the heavens according to the astronomy of that time. If we remember our Greek astronomy (which was the going one until long after Muhammad) correctly, it was like this:

  1. The outer layer or ceiling: The stars.
  2. The 7. Heaven Saturn.
  3. The 6. Heaven Jupiter.
  4. The 5. heaven Mars.
  5. The 4. Heaven The Sun.
  6. The 3. Heaven Venus.
  7. The 2. Heaven Mercury.
  8. The 1. Heaven The Moon.

The outer layer some "astronomers" reckoned to be the 8. heaven. We stress that you may find old "charts" with a different design or with a somewhat different sequence of the heavenly bodies. But as far as we have found, Islam is the only one with the stars fixed to the 1. Heaven. And the Moon claimed to be between the heavens(!)

All the same: The Quran here is scientifically wrong, but correct belief at the time of Muhammad. Who made the Quran?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!! NB!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

330 37/87a: "- - - the Lord of the Worlds - - -". This is a title used in the Quran for Allah. According to f.x. reality the titles is wrong. It also is wrong if Allah does not exist.

331 37/126: "Allah, your (the Jews'*) Lord and Cherisher, and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of the old (like Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, etc*)". No comments - and none necessary. But we mention that from around the time of David slowly start getting written sources from that area. Not one of them mentions a god like Allah, a book like the Quran, or a religion like Islam anywhere in the region, not to mention connected to the Jews - not until after 610 AD and Muhammad.

332 37/182b: "- - - Allah, the Lord and Cherisher of the Worlds (plural and wrong)". Often claimed, never proved.

333 37/182c: "- - - Allah, the Lord and Cherisher of the Worlds". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that these titles belong to Yahweh, not to Allah. Islam will have to prove this quote.

334 38/9c: "(Allah*) the Grantor of Bounties without measure". Also a never proved claim. Many Muslims grew rich by stealing/robbing from non-Muslims and often killing them or in other ways destroying their lives - acts forever after glorified by Islam and by Muslims. But many a Pagan other places grew rich the same way - it was not the work of an Allah, but of injustice, immoral and inhumanity. And as for a possible next life, the claimed benefits only are claims in a book full of wrongs, and told by the man who institutionalized things like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), "break even your oath if that gives a better result", deceit, and "war is betrayal" (and everything outside Islam is the "land of war") simply by accepting it or even use it or advice it himself.

335 38/65f: "(Allah is*) Supreme, Irresistible - - -". The Bible does not agree - there Yahweh is said to be the supreme one.

##336 39/4e: (MA 39/4)"He (Allah*) is "limitless in His glory" - i.e. complete in His excellence and utterly remote from all imperfection - He is 'ipso facto' ('eo ipso' in the more reliable Swedish 2002 edition) remote from the incompleteness inherent in the need of, or desire for, progeny, which logically precludes the possibility of His having a son". The logic here is wrong - a wish for company or a co-worker does not have to be because of an imperfection. And wrong also because:

1. Mr. Azad here presumes he knows how a god thinks or wishes. No-one knows that. Then it impossible to make logical conclusions about a god's thoughts, conclusions and deeds, like Mr. Asad here does, as one does not have the necessary knowledge.

2. From Mr. Azad's logic there also would be no angels - no omniscient and omnipotent god needs angels. According to the Quran there all the same are thousands and millions and more of them.

##This argument is an "ad hock" construction made up - partly outside the rules for logical conclusions - for to explain away a problem. You find quite a number of such ones in Islam - frequently outside the rules for logical conclusions like here (often simply omitting facts which would make the conclusion invalid - like here omitting the fact that no human really can know how a god thinks or feels).

337 39/10c: "- - - your (people's*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". Allah is nobody's lord unless he exists and is something supernatural (remember he can be your lord/ruler even if he belongs t the dark forces).

338 39/37d: "((Allah is*) Able to enforce his Will.))" Often claimed, never proved - and even big words are cheap.

339 39/37e: "((Allah is*) Able to enforce his Will.))" Why then does he have to use humans to do the dirty work for him - destroying the lives of others, killing, raiding, waging war, raping, terrorizing, stealing?

340 39/44b: "To Allah belongs (the right to grant) intercession - - -". One more of Muhammad's never proved claims - claims any believer in any religion can make free of charge on behalf of his/her god(s) as long as one can fast-talk requests for proofs away, as lofty claims are that cheap.

341 39/44c: "To Allah belongs (the right to grant) intercession - - -". Contradicted by the Bible which tells that this right belongs to Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

#342 39/55c: "- - - from your (Muslims*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". No god was involved in the making or delivery of a book so full of mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, unclear language, little or no innovation (most are from surrounding religions and cultures, or from the old Arab pagan religion and culture, included the god al-Lah/Allah), bad composition, etc. like the Quran. It simply is an insult and heresy to blame a god for something of a quality like the Quran.

343 39/62b: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Guardian and disposer of all affairs." Allah decides everything - the predestination.

344 39/67d: "High is He (Allah*) above (all others*) - - -". Only if he exists and is a major god. And what about Yahweh?

345 39/75c: "- - - Allah, the Lord of the Worlds! (Plural and wrong*)". Often claimed in the Quran, never really documented anywhere. One of the very many never proved claims in the Quran.

346 39/75d: "- - - Allah, the Lord of the Worlds! (Plural and wrong*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that the lord of the world is Yahweh, not Allah. (And we remind you: When we some places - far from all - points to contradictions between the Bible and the Quran, we do not say that the Bible is right. We just point to differences, and give Islam the possibility to do what they never have done through all times: Prove that it is they who are telling the truth.)

347 40/3e: "- - - (Allah*) hath a Long Reach (in all things)." Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved anywhere. Many claims, not one proved case.

348 40/8f: "(Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". At least he has never clearly proved his might.

349 40/12e: "The command is with Allah - - -". Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved.

350 40/12f: "- - - Allah, most High, Most Great". Is he really when the Quran is not from a god? - too many wrong facts, etc. for that.

351 40/15b: "- - - (He (Allah*) is the Lord of the Throne (of Authority) - - -". One of the many, many never proved claims in the Quran.

352 40/15c: "- - - (He (Allah*) is the Lord of the Throne (of Authority) - - -". According to the Bible that throne belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah.

353 40/16f: "- - - Allah, - - - the Irresistible!" Similar claims are legion in the Quran - but never anything but claims.

354 40/22c: "- - - He (Allah*) is Full of Strength - - -". He has in case never one single time clearly documented his strength.

355 40/23d: "- - - an Authority manifest (from Allah*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it was from Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

356 40/33b: "- - - no defender shall ye (non-Muslims*) have from Allah - - -". Now we are back to the fact that many moral, ethical and even judicial codes are very different between especially NT and the Quran. This means that Yahweh may think you are a good person who at least try to live according to his basic ideal: "Do unto others like you want others do unto you", even if Allah wants to send you to hell for not wanting to steal/rob, enslave, suppress, rape, and murder for him and Muhammad. So may be Yahweh will interfere? - if any of them exists. (Well, to interfere against Allah should not be too difficult, as it is highly unlikely he exists - the only rumor about him is in a book full of mistakes, dictated by an man with doubtful morality, believing in the use of dishonesty, and liking respect, power, riches - at least for bribes - and women.

367 40/62a: "- - - Allah, your Lord (god*) - - -". If he exists and in addition is a god, then perhaps.

358 40/65f: "- - - Allah, Lord of the Worlds - - -". Often claimed, never proved.

359 40/65g: "- - - Allah, Lord of the Worlds - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

360 40/66d: "- - - Allah, Lord of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) - - -". Often claimed, never proved".

###361 40/68b: " - - - He (Allah*) says to it, 'Be' and it is". And who knows - maybe he once said: "Be a son" and Jesus was. What human is able to understand the unfathomable thoughts and wishes of an omniscient god?

362 41/9f: "He (Allah*) is the Lord of (all) the Worlds (plural and wrong*)". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

363 41/9g: "He (Allah*) is the Lord of (all) the Worlds (plural and wrong*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the Lord of the World, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

364 41/12g: "(Allah*) the Exalted in Might - - -". Might he in case never have clearly proved.

365 41/15g: "- - - Allah - - - was superior to them (the 'Ad*) in strength - - -". The old fact once more: Not unless he existed and was something supernatural.

366 41/39i: "For He (Allah*) has power over all things". He in case never has unmistakably demonstrated his power - in Islam everything just is only unproved claims, unproved words, demands for and glorification of blind belief - normally a sure way to be deceived - etc.

367 41/54b: "It is He (Allah*) that doth encompass all things!". If he exists. If he is a major god. And If the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about him and his or Muhammad's religion.

368 42/3e: "- - - Allah, Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly has proved his power.

370 42/9b: "But it is Allah - He is the Protector - - -". This only may be true if Allah exists, and if he is a major god. And it only is true if the Quran describes him and his religion correctly (if he belongs to the dark forces, he may be quite a protector!)

If Allah happens to be from the dark forces - like many points in the Quran may indicate, and even more so parts of the Quran's moral code, even though we believe that not even a devil had sent a "holy" book of a quality like the Quran (unless he was forced to use that partly helpless quality) - then he really is some protector./p>

371 42/9d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who has power over all things". He in case never clearly has proved such power.

372 42/19c: "- - - He (Allah*) has Power and can carry out His Will". Thought provoking here: Allah NEVER clearly has demonstrated his claimed power - yes, not even his existence. Everything only is words from a man whom even central and relevant Islamic literature shows wanted riches (for attracting and keeping followers) and power - and women - and had a doubtful moral (al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing),break your oaths if that paid, rob and rape and enslave your victims, murder your opponents, etc.). Whenever reality tells one story, and nice words another, we always believe the reality, not the nice propaganda.

373 42/28a: "He (Allah*) is the One that sends down rain - - -". Muhammad is totally shameless when it comes to use natural phenomena without the slightest documentation, for glorification and "proof" for his claimed god - just like any pagan priest. All such cases are entirely without value, as long as it is not proved it really is Allah who does it. The only thing the use of invalid claims""signs"/"proof" really prove, is that the user has no real arguments or proofs - if he had had, he had used them instead. More sinister: Who is it normally who uses invalid arguments and "proofs"? - the cheat, charlatan, swindler, and deceiver.

Also see 11/7a above.

374 42/28b: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Protector - - -". Only possible - possible - if he exists and is something supernatural, white or black.

375 42/29e: “- - - He (Allah*) has the power to gather them (the living creatures*) together when He wills.” A never proved power - as far as science knows, this has never happened since the first living beings populated the Earth (the Big Flood may be an exception, but neither science nor Islam has been able to find traces from such a big flood some thousands years ago). May be Allah has never willed? Or is the reason something else?

376 42/29f: "- - - when He (Allah*) wills". (= he can do what he wills when he wills.) This claim is similar to the ones in 14/19d above.

377 42/33b: “If it be His (Allah’s) Will, He can still the Wind - - -”. That we can, too - - - as long as we do not have to prove it.

378 42/34a: "Or He (Allah*) can cause them to perish - - -". Similar often claimed, never proved. (That is to say: Muslims can cause people to perish.)

379 42/47b: "Because of (the ordainment of) Allah". One more of the very many never proved claims in the Quran. Exactly not one single central thing concerning his claimed god, his claimed connection to a god, or about his new religion, was Muhammad able to prove - it all just are lose words and lose claims from a man of a doubtful moral standard.

380 42/49d: "He (Allah*) creates what He wills - - -". Perhaps there was a reason why he wanted a son, and then he "creates what He wills". The argument used in the Quran at least one place that he could have no son because he had no consort, is thus invalid (and perhaps wrong - remember the very old information about an "Amat").

381 42/49e: "He (Allah*) creates what He wills - - -". This is one of the Quran's more interesting claims - like normal for Muhammad and the Quran never documented - interesting just because neither Allah nor Muhammad ever was able to prove anything, neither about his power for creation, nor about his power for recreation, whereas Yahweh proved a lot, it either the Bible or the Quran tells the truth at this point.

382 42/50d: "- - - He (Allah*) is full of - - - power". He in case never, not one single time in 1400 years, clearly has proved his claimed power.

383 42/53d: "Behold (how) all affairs tend towards Allah". We at least are unable to see that - not unless we block our knowledge and our brain, and also block the facts told in the Quran, and only judges from the glorifying words, the lose words and claims and the as lose and invalid "signs" and "proofs".

384 43/11a: "(Allah*) sends down - - - rain - - -". There are very many cases like this in the Quran, where Muhammad claims his god makes the natural phenomena - just like the same phenomena is claimed for many a relevant pagan god like Allah/al-Lah was originally. Muhammad never proves such claims - it only is lose words resting on nothing. Also see 11/7a above.

385 43/12d: "(Allah*) has made for you (humans*) ships - - -". No comments - and none necessary; wrong as wrong can be - they all were handmade and to designs man had found out little by little through millennia.

386 43/82b: "- - - (Allah*) the Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved - many gods or their followers make the same or similar claims. Claims are cheap as long as proofs are unnecessary.

387 43/82c: "- - - (Allah*) the Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

388 43/82e: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of the Throne (of Authority!". A claim parallel to 43/82b and 43/82c above.

389 43/84a: "It is He (Allah*) Who is God in heaven and God on earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved. This was just one of those things Muhammad's contemporaries asked for proofs for, but Muhammad never was able to prove anything at all, included this - one of the reasons for why he glorified blind belief, and for why he talked so much about his claimed, but never proved - and invalid for proofs - "signs" and "proofs".

390 43/84b: "It is He (Allah*) Who is God in heaven and God on earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says this belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

391 44/7a: "The Lord (Allah*) of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth and all between them - - -". Often claimed, never proved - neither Allah nor Muhammad were ever able to prove anything at all of any essence. And in all other aspects of life blind belief is the surest way to be cheated.

392 44/7b: "The Lord (Allah*) of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth and all between them - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that Yahweh, not Allah is lording this. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

393 44/8c: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord and Cherisher to - - - your earliest ancestors". The Quran claims that Islam was the original religion and the religion of even the first humans. Man is much older - a few million years since our very first forefather - but modern man - Homo Sapiens - emerged 160ooo - 200ooo years ago (the latest findings may indicate ca. 195ooo years ago). During all that time there is not one single trace of a god like Allah, a book like the Quran (even though Muhammad told it was sent down to all prophets through the times - in spite of that it only is a few thousand years since man first learnt how to read, so that no prophet in case understood anything in the book for the first 150ooo years and more = one more wrong claim in the Quran), or a religion like Islam until after 610 AD, when Muhammad started his preaching (actually he started it for real in 613 AD) - not in old artifacts, not in architecture, not in stone carvings, not in history, not in literature, not even in legends or fairy tales. What comes closest, were the Mosaic and the Christian religions, but their god was Yahweh, not Allah - two clearly different gods, as the basic elements of their religions were very different on too many points (especially easy to see if you compare the Quran to NT and its New Covenant).

394 44/42c: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Might - - -". This is often claimed in the Quran, but never clearly showed - if showed at all.

395 45/2c: "- - - Allah the Exalted in Power - - -". If he is, he at least never clearly has showed it. Never.

396 45/12b: "- - - that ships may sail upon it (the sea*) by His (Allah's*) command - - -". Similar to 45/12a just above. Also see 11/7a above.

397 45/19c: "- - - Allah is the Protector of the Righteous". If He exists and is not one more mistake in the Quran. And if he in case is correctly described in that book - well, he may also be a protector if he belongs to the dark forces, but what kind of a protector?

398 45/26c: "- - - then He (Allah*) gives you death - - -". Yes, it is well known that Allah and his followers give death to many. Many of them even murders prohibited by the Quran (according to the Quran you f.x. shall not kill women, children and old ones, and not people who are not guilty in anything - and no indiscriminate killing.)

Also see 11/7a above.

399 45/36b: "- - - Allah, Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong) and Lord of the earth - - -". Two more never proved and thus totally invalid claims Muhammad uses to glorify and prove his god - and his own platform of power.

400 45/36c: "- - - Allah, Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong) and Lord of the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

401 45/36e: "- - - (Allah is*) Lord and Cherisher of all the Worlds (plural and wrong*)!". See 45/36b+c above.

402 45/37c: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly has proved it.

403 46/2d: "- - - Allah the Exalted in Power - - -". Power he in case never clearly has shown.

404 46/32c: "- - - no protection can he (non-Muslim*) have besides Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is a good protector. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

405 46/33d: "Yea, verily He (Allah*) has power over all things". He in case never has proved his power - there only are words and claims, both of which are cheap.

406 47/11a: "- - - Allah is the Protector of those who believe (in him*) - - -". If we had a choice, we would prefer a protector who had proved his existence - not only have to rely on lose words from a man whom even the Quran and Hadiths, etc. describe as power-hungry, ruthless, unreliable, and a liar - if you read his demands and deeds, not his nice, but cheap and never proved words. In 1400 years there is not one single act which clearly is made by Allah - only words and claims from an unreliable man, greedy for power, for money for bribes - and for women. And the blind belief in the words of the fathers - taqlid - for Muslims, the words insisting on that a book full of mistakes and thus from no god, represents the only god and salvation.

407 47/17c: "- - - He (Allah*) increases - - -". Impossible unless he exists.

408 48/7a: "For to Allah belong the Forces of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that it belong to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

409 48/21b: "- - - Allah has power over all things". Claims like this are very frequent in the Quran, but has never been clearly proved one single time in 1400 years. Not one single time - only words. (Before you protest: Try to find one single proof - proof - from Islam for the power of Allah. They launch claims "en masse" - and demands for and glorification of blind belief - but never one single real proof.)

410 49/7f: "- - - but Allah has endeared the Faith to you, and made it beautiful in your hearts - - -". Allah or someone else? The Quran's many mistakes, its partly immoral moral code, and its inhuman war religion may make one think about forces very different from benevolent gods.

411 49/18b: “Verily Allah knows the secrets of the heavens (plural and wrong - some proofs or statements the Quran chooses) and the earth - - -”. Not if he reveres a “Mother Book” (43/4) he has copied the Quran from, in his heaven”. See 40/75, 41/12 and 49/16a above.

412 50/9a: "And We (Allah*) send down from the sky rain - - -". See f.x. 11/7a and 50/6a above.

#413 51/23a: "- - - by the Lord (Allah*) of the heaven and the earth, this is the very Truth". The Quran is swearing by Allah that its tales are true. Sentences in the Quran starting with "by" normally are oaths. It is to be hoped that the claim really is true, because if not Muhammad has made a false oath. But then broken oaths are permitted in the Quran, if that gives a better result - you only may have to pay expiation to Allah. The swearing in the Quran and its point of view to swearing, and added Muhammad's and the Quran's points of view to breaking oats are one - at least - more 100% proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god and for that Jesus and Muhammad are not in the same line of anything essential and definitely not in the same moral world: The Bible, and especially NT is very clear on that you shall not swear at all (f.x. Matt. 5/34), and if you all the same do it, you are obliged to honor your oath.

414 51/23b: "- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the heaven and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved - and big words are cheap.

415 51/23c: "- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the heaven and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that Yahweh is the lord of this, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

416 51/47a: "- - - We (Allah*) construct(ed*) the Firmament - - -". The fact that it is very wrongly described in the Quran, proves that something is wrong here: A constructor knows how his construction is constructed. Also see 11/7a above.

417 51/58c: "For Allah is - Lord of Power - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord of power. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

418 52/43b: "Exalted is Allah far above the things they (non-Muslims*) associate with Him!" Perhaps - if he exists, and if the Quran tells the true story about him. And also: On the other hand the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh has proved his power if either the Bible or the Quran tells the truth about this - Allah has proved not a thing.

419 53/5b: “- - - one Mighty in Power (Allah - by means of the Angel Gabriel*) - - -.” But is Allah mighty in power? – there is not one single proof for that. Lots and lots of words – even big words – but not one single proof. NB: It also may be that "one mighty in power" here means the angel Gabriel himself, not Allah.

If Muhammad's Gabriel in reality was someone from the dark forces dressed up like Gabriel, there also may have been power included.

420 53/23b: "- - - for which Allah has sent down no authority (whatever)". Allah has no authority whatever to send down if he does not exist or if he is no major god, none of which is proved - there only are Muhammad's undocumented and little reliable words for it. A man believing in the use of lies, deceit, broken oaths, etc. and wanting power and riches - at least for bribes - and dozens of women, is not very reliable.

421 53/26a: "However many be the angels in the heavens, their intercession will avail nothing, except after Allah has given leave for whom He pleases - - -". Other places in the Quran states that there will be no intercessors, but at least there are if Allah permits.

422 53/49a: “- - - He (Allah) is the Lord of Sirius - - -". Claims are cheap as long as you are able for flee from all requests for proofs. There are nearly legion unproved claims in the Quran. F.x. this one.

423 53/49b: “- - - He (Allah) is the Lord of Sirius (the Mighty Star) - - -”. Sirius it not very mighty, even if it may look like that from Earth. Even if it is big, it is a dwarf compared to stars like Betelgeuse, Aldebaran and millions more. Not to mention compared to the real super giants. And just a firecracker compared to f.x. the enormously potent Eta Carinae (borderline enormous, and unstable for exploding, and expected to go supernova in the astronomically near future).

424 54/31: "And We (Allah*) sent against them (the Thamud*) a single Mighty Blast - - -". A never documented point - like so many in the Quran. But a curiosity - and some contradictions: In 11/67 and 54/31 they were killed by a mighty blast - an explosion of some kind (they are said to have lived in Hirj some 150 miles/240 km north of Medina, in a mountainous country and we have been told it is volcanic - though sleeping such (the main activity came to an end some 400ooo years ago) - area, so a blast/explosion might perhaps have been possible), but in 7/78 they are killed by an earthquake, and in 69/5 by a terrible storm.

At least 3 contradictions.

Comment YA2004 to 15/83 where they were killed by a mighty blast: "The mighty rumbling noise and wind accompanying an earthquake". There is no wind (and no blast, thunder or lightning) accompanying earthquakes - the mechanism producing wind is totally different, a fact even educated Muslim scholars know, but all the same they produces arguments like this. Intellectual dishonesty - there is a bit much of this in Islam. And in a religion using dishonesty/lies for arguments, how much is true of their other arguments? - and of their religion?

#####The reason for this dishonesty, is that it is believed that "the people of the rocky tract" just is another name of the Thamud tribe. And in 7/78 the Thamuds were killed by an earthquake. 11/67 and 15/83 they were killed by a mighty blast. And in 69/5 they were killed by " terrible Storm of thunder and lightning!". Voila!: Make wind/blast accompany earthquakes or let the noise represent a blast to hide this mistake in the Quran - but forget the thunder and lightning! But neither wind nor blasts nor thunder nor lightning is a part of an earthquake.

#####Honesty too often is not essential for Muslims and Islam. The main thing is to make the Quran and thus Islam look like they are true. But when even persons like Muhammad Yusuf Ali uses dishonesty - here an la-Taqiyya (a lawful lie), how many more lies are there then in Islamic literature and argumentation? - and in the Quran and in Islam?

425 54/42c: "- - - (Allah is*) able to carry out his Will". Sometimes claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

426 54/55b: "- - - a Sovereign Omnipotent (Allah*)". If he exists and is a major god with power - neither of which is ever proved. (And actually contradicted by the Bible by not even being mentioned there, neither Allah nor any of his claimed prophets, except prophets the Bible tells were from Yahweh). Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

427 55/24a: “And His (Allah’s) are the Ships sailing - - -”. We never heard about a god owning ships. It cannot be literally meant. But the Quran says it is to be read literally.

428 55/27b: "- - - (Allah*) - full of Majesty, Bounty and Honor". Often claimed - but f.x. 1/1a seriously questions this. Though "bounty" Allah has plenty of as long as Muslims can produce it themselves by stealing/robbing it from non-Muslims "lawful and good".

429 55/29a: "Of Him (Allah*) seeks (in need) every creature in the heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth - - -". One of the many never proved claims in the Quran - actually very wrong, as very many living beings included the large majority of humans (and likely all non-human beings) do not seek Allah. Also see 11/7a above.

430 55/29c: "- - - every day in (new) Splendor doth He (Allah*) (shine)!" No comment until Islam produces at least a small proof for that Allah really exists and is a major god, or at least a god and really is the maker of this, none of which Muhammad and Allah were ever able to prove in spite of repeated requests. Muhammad only was able to produce excuses and "explanations" for being unable to prove even a nanometer of his claims.

431 55/33c: "Not without authority - - -". Here is implicated that it means authority from Allah, but the bitter truth is that may be there exists no Allah, and even if he exists, maybe he has no power. Nothing is proved about Allah or his powers - there only are lose claims. Many believe - some even strongly - but it only is belief, not knowledge.

432 55/78: "- - - (Allah*), full of Majesty, Bounty and Honor". Please read 1/1a above and see if he deserves it - if he exists. As for bounty, he may have plenty as long as Muslims can steal/rob it from non-Muslims "lawful and good".

433 56/60a: "We (Allah*) have decreed Death to be your common lot - - -". This only is possible if Allah exists and is a major god. And it is one more of Muhammad's never proved claims.

435 56/64a: "Is it ye (humans*) who cause it (seeds*) to grow, or are We (Allah*) the cause?". A rhetoric question. But if Allah is the cause, he at least never has proved it - one of the many, many natural phenomena Muhammad claims for glorification and indication of his god, but always without proving that it really is Allah who does it. Totally invalid as glorification. Totally invalid as indication or proof. See 11/7a above.

Also (we quote): "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar are very often used.

436 56/69: "Do ye (bad people*) bring it down (in rain) from the Cloud or do We (Allah)". As dishonest a question as in 56/59 and 56/64a+b. Also see 11/7a above.

Also (we quote): "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar are very often used.

437 56/70a: “- - - We (Allah*) could make it (all rain*) salt - - -”. Not without changing both natural and physical laws. Salt simply does not evaporate, and then as simply cannot rain down. If Islam insists it is true, they will have to prove it - words are cheap. (There is one extra comment here though: Droplets blown up from the sea may dry before they reach the sea again, and micro particles of salt may drift in the wind. But this effect is too small to give salty rain.)

438 56/74b: "- - - (Allah*), the Supreme!" This only can be - not is, but can be - true if Allah exists and is the top god (he cannot be the only god in case, as the Quran accepts that the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him up with Allah).

439 56/80b: “A Revelation (the Quran*) from the Lord of the Worlds (Allah*) - - -”. Can it really be so? See 41/12 - and 40/75. Impossible – no omniscient god would make/deliver a book with so many mistakes, contradictions, etc. – not to mention keep it in his own Heaven as a revered Mother Book (13/39 - 43/4 - 85/21-22). Can this be a revelation from a god? Or the other way around: Can something producing a book with so many mistakes, contradictions, so much invalid, logic, be lord and god of even one world? Also see 2/131 – 6/155 – 7/196 – 8/41 – 11/14 – 13/1 - 13/19 – 13/37 – 14/1 – 15/1 – 16/102 – 20/4 – 26/109 – 26/127 – 26/192 – 31/21 – 32/2 – 34/6 – 36/5 – 43/43 – 45/2 – 46/2 - 47/9.

440 56/96b: "- - - (Allah*), the Supreme". This only can be - not is, but can be - true if Allah exists and is the top god (he cannot be the only god, as the Quran accepts that the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him up with Allah).

441 56/96c: "- - - (Allah*), the Supreme". This actually is contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the supreme - and though it mentions a number of pagan gods "en passent", it never mentions al-Lah/Allah (and in spite of the Quran's, Islam's and Muslims vehement claims also never Muhammad). Also see + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

442 57/1d: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Exalted in Might - - -". He in case never has proved that might.

443 57/2e: "- - - He (Allah*) has Power over all things". He in case never in 1400 years one single time clearly has shown that power. And never before, too.

444 57/3a: "He (Allah*) is the First and the Last - - -". Claims of similar contents - that Allah is the one and supreme god - you find many places in the Quran. It is one of the many never proved claims Muhammad put forth.

445 57/3b: "He (Allah*) is the First and the Last - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the top ruler, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

446 57/4e: "- - - (Allah*) is firmly established on the Throne (of authority) - - -". Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved anywhere - and for what it is worth contradicted by the Bible, which says that throne belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

447 57/4g: "And He (Allah*) is with you (Muslims*) wheresoever you may be." A soothing sentence if you are a good and obedient Muslim, a sobering sentence for the not good ones - - - and an untrue sentence if Allah does not exist or is not a major god. (Not to mention what it is if he belongs to the dark forces.)

448 57/5c: "- - - all affairs are referred back to Him (Allah*)". = In the end of all cases it in reality is Allah who decides everything - the in the Quran well known predestination; everything have to be run by "Allah's Plan", which nothing and nobody can change.

*449 57/6a: “He (Allah*) merges Night into Day, and Day into Night - - -”. Wrong. It is the sun and the revolving of the Earth which do this - any god knew it, but Muhammad not. Then who made the Quran? If Islam still says Allah does it - or made the natural laws behind it - they will have to bring proof - - - but proofs, and not just words or statements any priest can use for any god, as statements and words are very cheap.

NB: This verse Muslims use to say Muhammad knew the Earth was spherical, because this only could happen if the Earth is spherical. But:/p>

  1. a. The Quran tells that night and day follow their courses = it is they who move, not Earth. In that case the shape of Earth does not matter - the gradual change between night and day could happen no matter what shape the Earth had, included flat - because it would depend on the movement of night and day.
  2. b. Muhammad saw how day and night changed. He did not need to know the shape of Earth - he only described what he saw.
  3. c. Also every time the Quran compares the Earth to something, it is to something flat.

The claim is invalid.

450 57/10b: "For to Allah belongs the heritage of the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth". Often claimed, never proved. Claims like this one are cheap as long as you do not have to prove anything.

451 57/10c: "For to Allah belongs the heritage of the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims it belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

452 57/14e: "- - - the Command of Allah". This undocumented claim only can be true if Allah exists and is a major god. (Well, he can have issued a command even if he should happen to belong to the dark forces).

453 57/22f: "- - - that is truly easy for Allah - - -". At least the words are truly easy for anyone.

454 57/25j: "- - - Allah is full of Strength, Exalted in Might - - -". But strength and might he has never clearly shown - only words, and words are cheap.

455 57/25k: "- - - (and (Allah is*) able to enforce His Will)". Comment similar to 57/25j just above.

456 58/10d: "- - - except as Allah permits - - -". The old fact: Allah can neither permit nor prohibit unless he exists and is something supernatural.

457 58/21f: "- - - Allah is One full of strength, able to enforce His Will". But not in one single case since 610 AD - 1400 real years and some 1442 of the artificial Muslims years (in 2010 AD) - has Allah clearly been able to enforce his will, except by means of the sword, of human followers, or by other means of force or pressure backed by such swords, included terrorism - and there it always was brutality, not proved divine engagement which did the deed - - - or misdeed.

458 59/6f: "- - - Allah has power over all things". Often claimed, never - not once - proved. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) And in this case the real truth likely is closer to Napoleon: "The god is with the strongest armies".

459 59/16a: "- - - Allah, the Lord of the Worlds! (plural and wrong*)" Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved - and contradicted by the Bible which says Yahweh is the lord of the world (you do not meet the 7 worlds in the Bible), not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

460 59/23d: "- - - (Allah is*) the Sovereign - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the sovereign one, not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

461 59/23g: "- - - (Allah is*) the Guardian of Faith - - -". Allah can be the guardian of nothing unless he exists and is something supernatural - white or dark.

462 59/23i: "- - - (Allah is*) the Preserver of Safety - - -". There never was a god of war who was the preserver of safety - war always means risk and danger and being unsafe - - - and death to many.

463 59/23k: "- - - (Allah is*) the Irresistible - - -". There are many who have been able to resist him - by not becoming Muslims or by leaving Islam. But is the real reason for being able to do so, may be that he does not exist?

464 59/23l: "- - - (Allah is*) the Supreme - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the supreme one, not Allah. In the Bible Allah is so insignificant that he is not even mentioned - and the same goes for his preachers and followers and his very religion of dishonesty, apartheid, hate, and war. That is to say he may have been lumped together with others under the name "false gods", and his preachers under "false prophets". But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

465 62/1d: "- - - (Allah*) the Sovereign, the Holy One - - -". This only may be true if he exists and in addition is a god, none of which is ever proved.

466 62/1e: "- - - (Allah*) the Sovereign, the Holy One - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the sovereign - and holy - god. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

467 62/1f: "(Allah*) the Exalted in Might - - -". He in case never unmistakably has shown his might.

468 62/3a: "- - - He (Allah^*) is Exalted in Might - - -". He in case never unmistakably has shown his might.

469 64/7g: "And that is easy for Allah". Only if he really exists and has such power.

470 65/1e: "- - - Allah your (Muslims'/humans'*) Lord - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

471 65/3c: "For Allah will surely accomplish His purpose - - -". Only if he exists and is powerful, none of which was ever proved.

472 66/2c: "- - - Allah is your (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Not unless he exists and is something supernatural - preferably a god.

473 66/4c: "- - - truly Allah is his (Muhammad's*) Protector - - -". The same old fact: Only if Allah exists and is something supernatural. The same goes for Gabriel, who is not necessarily (unlikely) Yahweh's arch angel Gabriel, even if the name is the same. This will especially be the case if Muhammad's Gabriel in reality was someone from the dark forces, dressed up like Gabriel.

474 66/6d: "- - - the Commands they (angels*) receive from Allah - - -". This only can be the case if Allah exists and if he in addition has power over angels. By the way: Why does a claimed omnipotent god who just can say "Be" and things are, need to order angels to do this and that?

475 66/8j: "- - - Thou (Allah*) hast power over all things". He at least never clearly has showed that power - till now it all has been only empty words.

##476 67/5b: “- - - and We (Allah*) have made such (lamps (stars*) as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones - - -”. Well, well. Any secondary school child able to see that the entry from the same verse 67/5a were wrong, would laugh from this: Stars fastened to the lowest heaven and then doubling as shooting stars to drive this away! Today it is clear such "information" only belongs in fairy tales. Also see 67/3 and 67/5a. Who made the Quran?

No further comments - except that you find similar in 15/17-18 - 37/10 – 72/8.

477 67/5d: (A67/5 – omitted in 2008 edition): “We (Allah*) have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven (out of the 7 the Quran frequently tells about, and which Muhammad even visited*) with lamps (stars*), and We have made such (lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones - - -.” But the disagreement concerns: Is it the stones in the shooting stars that chase jinns, etc. away? – the Arab word “rudjum” – plural of “radjm” means “throwing of stones” or “stoning” (one name for the Devil f.x. is “ar-radjim” = “the stoned one”). Or is it the fire? – the Quran really mention the fire. Once more: Start guessing. (The 2008 edition of “The Message of the Quran” even has got a new one – at least new to us: The Quran is not talking about stars used like shooting stars, but used as objects for divination by the bad astrologers. They need a lot of easy words to reach that conclusion, but so what? – as we have indicated before: In Islam sometimes the religion is more essential than honesty and intellectual integrity. Though we have touched this theme before, we ask again: What does it indicate that a religion has to resort to cheating and dishonesty? Normally such methods mean that one does not have real arguments. In religion there also is the serious fact: If there is a next life, and if a religion needs to base its life on lies – even only partly – that is a strong indication for that that religion is not based on the truth. And in that case its believers will not wake up in any Paradise.)

The Islamic universe. 7 Heavens, 7 Earths, and Hell.

According to the Quran the “everything” is like this:

On top of all - above the 7. heaven - Allah has his residence.

Seven heavens above the Earth – one on top of the other. They have names, guardian angel, and gates.

The heavens are resting on the Earth by means of invisible pillars.

In between the heavens are the sun (?) and the moon.

The sun is a flat disk (if not it cannot be folded up like it does at the Day of Doom).

The 7 heavens contain Paradise - the higher heavens are for top Muslims.

The lower heaven is for "normal good" Muslims - split in at least 4 gardens = 4 qualities.

Under heavens, and fastened to the lowest (37/6-7, 41/12) one, are all the stars.

Allah often uses stars as shooting stars to chase away jinns and bad spirits spying on Heaven.

Under the heavens and stars are clouds – which Allah sometimes breaks to pieces (rain).

Under that the birds are kept up there by the will of Allah only.

On the Earth mountains are set down - or really dropped down.

The reason why Allah has set down mountains on Earth is to stabilize it - if not it can start wobbling and tip over (This is the Quran's real meaning).

(Modern Muslims claims the mountains are set down to reduce earthquakes - but mountains do not reduce earthquakes (on the contrary sometimes)).

According to Hadiths 2 of the rivers on Earth starts in Heaven - the Nile and Euphrates.

Earth was – according to the Quran - created together with the heavens from something like smoke which Allah ordered to come together to one mass and then he split asunder. One part became our flat Earth (or really "earths" as there are 7 (65/12) – one on top of the other according to Hadiths) and the other became heaven, or actually the 7 material heavens which lies above Earth. (For more about this, see the Quran about the creation of heaven).

On the Earth also all kinds of beings live – created from clay or something or nothing.

Man - Adam - is created in 13 different ways if you count exactly and strictly (5 - 7 if you are kind-hearted towards Islam).

All this is existing or living on our flat Earth.

There are 7 earths - according to Hadiths the others are under "our" Earth.

According to Hadiths Islam knows the names of the 7 earths - and the name of their people.

Underneath everything is Hell

 

(we have not found out for sure if Hell is situated in the world Ajiba).

The lower the earth the more Hell-like is the situation for its inhabitants, Hadiths tell.

And at the bottom Hell (?)

 

All this (possibly with the exception of Paradise and Hell) was created in 6 - or 8 - days.

That it took 6 days, is mentioned at least in 10/3 – 11/7 – 25/59 – 32/4 – 50/38 - 57/4 (41/9-12 says 8 days). But science tells a very different story.

Just like your teacher of geography told you? And who created this nonsense?

##(YA5570):"He (Allah*) Who creates must necessarily know His own handiwork". This is very correct, so when the Quran shows that the maker of that book clearly do not know the reality, it is a strong proof for that something is very wrong somewhere.

The 7 heavens, its guardian angels, and its gates:

  1. 7.Gharibya, angel Razquel, gate made from shining light.
  2. 6.Rafqa, angel Shamkhael, gate made from white pearl.
  3. 5.Ratqa, angel Kalkael, gate made from gold.
  4. 4.Arqlun, angel Salsael, gate made from silver.
  5. 3.Aun, angel Saadiel, gate made from topaz.
  6. 2.Faydum, angel Michael, gate made from ruby.
  7. 1.Birqi, angel Ismael, gate made from emerald.

The 7 heavens were Greek and Persian astronomy. One observed 7 movements on the firmament in addition to the stars: the sun and the moon, plus Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn (the other planets were not visible to the naked eye) - and thus needed 7 invisible heavens to fasten them to, to explain why they did not fall down on Earth. Any - any - god had known better. Then who made the Quran?

(If we remember our Greek astronomy (which was the going one until long after Muhammad) correctly, it was like this:

  1. The outer layer or ceiling: The stars.
  2. The 7. Heaven Saturn.
  3. The 6. Heaven Jupiter.
  4. The 5. heaven Mars.
  5. The 4. Heaven The Sun.
  6. The 3. Heaven Venus.
  7. The 2. Heaven Mercury.
  8. The 1. Heaven The Moon.

The outer layer some "astronomers" reckoned to be the 8. heaven. We stress that you may find old "charts" with a different design or with a somewhat different sequence of the heavenly bodies. But as far as we have found, Islam is the only one with the stars fixed to the 1. Heaven.)

The 7 Earths and Hell - and their people:

(As you see included "our" Earth - scientific name Tellus - Islam lists 8 Earths, but if you recon Ajiba to contain Hell, there are 7 + Hell. We have not found out of this for sure.)

The scientific name of the people on our Earth is Homo Sapiens. That means "the thinking human" or "knowing human". There are times when there are reasons for believing that this name is an ironical joke - f.x. when leaders demand blindness, blind belief, and acceptance/belief in obviously wrong facts and/or obviously invalid logic.

If there somewhere is a god who is behind the creation or development of man, his second most valuable gift - after life itself - is our brain. If it is a gift from a god, it is an insult to this god to use blind belief instead of the brain. (It also is an insult to that possible god to "explain" that his texts mean something different from what they really say - and it is a falsification of the quranic texts.)

  1. Ramaka. People: Muwasshim, in everlasting torment and divine retribution.
  2. Khalada. People: Tamis, eating their own flesh, drinking their own blood.
  3. Arq. People: Qays, eating dirt, drinking mother's milk. Pest: Mulelike eagles with spearlike tails and poisonous quills.
  4. Haraba. People: Jilla, have no eyes, hands, or feet, but batlike wings. Pest: the snakes of Hell, large as mountains.
  5. Maltham. People: Hajla, eat each other. Pest: carry stones of sulfur around their neck - may burn.
  6. Sijjin. People: Qatat, look like birds, worship Allah. Pest(?): contains the register of Hell.
  7. Ajiba. People: Khasum, black and short, with claws like lions. Pest: Iblis/the Devil lives here (Hell?). Gog and Magog will end here.

According to f.x. Al-Bukhari the Earths are placed one above the other – easy as the Quran tells the Earth(s) is/are flat. The lower down, the more devilish life on the respective layer – and if you are a big enough sinner, you can fall down through them all at the Day of Doom. It is not necessary to say it is all rubbish.

p> Also see 2/131 – 7/61 - 7/67 – 7/104 – 7/121 – 10/3 – 26/16 – 26/23 – 26/47 – 26/77 – 26/98 – 26/109 – 26/127 – 26/145 – 27/8 – 27/44 – 32/2 – 37/87 – 38/87 – 39/74 – 41/9 – 43/46 – 45/36 - 56/80 – 59/16 – 68/52 – 69/43 – 81/27 – 81/29 – 83/6 and many more. All these places mention “the worlds” in plural – f.x. “Lord of the Worlds (Allah*)” – and reference to the 7 worlds. But beware of a stumbling stone here: The Quran also in 1 – 2 cases uses the expression “the Worlds” in another connection – Muslim scholars believe it in that or those couple of cases refers to “man and Jinn” or “man and woman”. In western languages it is not possible to see the difference, because our nouns only have singular and plural. But in Arab (and some other languages) it is different: They have singular, dual (= 2), and plural. We are informed that in all such cases where the original Arab text has plural, it refers to the 7 non-existing Earths (well, one exists, even though it is not flat). But if the Arab text any place has the noun "Worlds" in dual, it just that place is referring to something else - like "man and jinn".

 

The 7 gates of Hell:

Like the heavens also Hell has 7 gates. They open to 7 parts of Hell, one worse than the next.

  1. Gehanna.
  2. Laza.
  3. Hutama.
  4. Sair.
  5. Saquar.
  6. Jahim. (This one is for Jews, Christians, and Sabeans - "the People of the Book".)
  7. Hawiya.

Once more: Just like your teacher of geography told you? And who created this nonsense?

Once more: ##(YA5570):"He (Allah*) Who creates must necessarily know His own handiwork". This is very correct, so when the Quran shows that the maker of that book clearly do not know the reality, it is a strong proof for that something is very wrong somewhere.

478 67/6b: "- - - their (peoples'*) Lord and Cherisher - - -". Here the Quran means Allah. But many people mean they have another "lord and cherisher" - f.x. Yahweh. If one or more of these others - as mentioned f.x. Yahweh - exist(s), they should be in a safe position - and especially will they be better off if their god exists, but Allah not.

##479 67/19a: “None can hold them (the birds*) up except (Allah) - - -”. Wrong. What holds the birds up, are the laws of aerodynamics. (Of course Muslims can use one of their favorite last resorts: Declare that Allah made those laws. But then they will have to prove that - not just use cheap words that any priest in any religion can use about any claimed god.) Also see 11/7a. Similar in 16/79a+b above.

480 67/19d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) that watches over all things". Only possible if Allah exist and in addition is a major god, none of which is ever proved.

481 68/48a: "- - - the Commend of thy (Muslim's*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". It may be a long wait if he does not exist.

482 70/3b: "- - - Allah, Lord of the Ways of Ascent - - -". See 70/2b above.

483 73/9a: "(He (Allah*) is) Lord of the East and the West - - -". The likely but not sure meaning of this - at least according to Muslims from times after Muhammad grew strong enough to get appetite for power also outside the Mecca and later Medina area - is that Allah is the god for all the world. In spite of this when you read the Quran, you find that all the material, tales, legends, fairy tales, etc. used, are specific for Arabia and its nearest surroundings, known in Arabia around 610 - 630 AD, and nothing from the rest of the claimed god's claimed dominion or stuff not known in Arabia at that time (as for the last fact; you meet many, many claims from Muslims about the Quran foretelling scientific facts, etc., but they have without exception one thing in common: They all are made up claims - either the texts in the Quran are twisted to fit modern scientific facts, or scientific facts are twisted to fit the Quran, or the claim simply is pure wishful thinking or an al-Taqiyya (a lawful lie) or a Kitman (a lawful half-truth) using peoples lack of real knowledge). (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.) No omniscient god for the whole world and all times would use only stuff specific just for one small area and from a short period of time, not to mention many wrong facts and other errors.

484 73/9d: "- - - take Him (Allah*) therefore for (thy) Disposer of Affairs - - -". This might be a bad idea if he does not exist, not to mention if he is from the dark forces, something f.x. the partly immoral codes of conduct in Islam after all may indicate.

485 74/11a: "Leave Me (Allah*) alone (to deal) with the (creature (man*)) whom I created (bare and) alone". Well, some years later Muhammad started to "help" Allah with managing those creatures - especially the ones that did not want him as their dictator. This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 28 abrogations).

486 75/23: "Looking towards their (Muslims*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". They may be in for a surprise, as this is one of the many, many points in the Quran which is contradicted by the Bible: They may be looking at Yahweh, not at Allah. Also see 67/9c above - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

487 78/37e: "- - - none shall have the power to argue with Him (Allah*)". Power he in case never clearly have showed - not once in 1400 years.

488 78/37f: "- - - none shall have the power to argue with Him (Allah*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the most powerful, not Allah. Also see 67/9c above - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

489 80/21: "Then He (Allah*) causeth him (man*) to die." Comment similar to 80/20a+b above.

490 81/29b: "- - - (Allah*) the Cherisher of the Worlds". See 1/1a and see how much he cherishes the world and its inhabitants. Besides this is contradicted by the Bible, which says that the cherisher of the world is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c above - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

491 83/5b: "- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the worlds". Similar often claimed, but never proved - not even Allah's existence is proved.

492 84/2: "And hearkens to the (Command of) it’s Lord (Allah*) - and it (the sky*) must needs to (do so) - - -". Allah has never proved he has any power, so why should he have power in this case?

Also animism - something you normally find in primitive religions and fairy tales.

###493 84/15+16: “For his Lord (Allah*) was ever watchful of him (non-Muslim*)! So I (Muhammad*) do call to witness the ruddy glow of Sunset - - -”. A serious one - here it once more is Muhammad who is speaking - in what is said to be the copy of the Mother Book (43/4) in Heaven, made of Allah and existed from eternity. How is that possible?

494 85/12b: "Truly strong is the Grip (and Power) of thy (humans'/Muslims##) Lord (Allah*)". Never proved power in case.

495 85/15a: "(Allah is) Lord of the Throne of Glory - - -". Similar often claimed, but never proved.

496 85/15b: "(Allah is) Lord of the Throne of Glory - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c above - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

497 87/1b: "- - - thy (Muslims'*) Guardian-Lord (Allah*) - - -". He only can be a guardian if he exists and in addition is a god.

498 87/1c: "- - - (Allah*) Most High". Similar often claimed, never proved.

499 89/14: "For thy (Muslims'/people's*) Lord (Allah*) is (as a Guardian) - - -". We are back to the old fact: Not unless he exists - and in this case also not unless he in addition is a good and benevolent god.

500 89/28: "- - - thy (people's*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". If he exists and if he is a god, and if the Quran in addition has explained his relationship to man correctly.

501 92/13a: "And, verily, unto Us (belong) the End and the Beginning." Proof? Proof? Proof? - often claimed, but never proved. And contradicted by the Bible (and by science).

502 92/20b: "- - - (Allah is the*) Lord Most High". Wrong if the Quran is not from a god or if it for some other reasons does not tell the only and full truth. (For some reason or other Islam and its Muslims seldom claim that Islam is the religion of honesty.)

503 92/20c: "- - - (Allah is the*) Lord Most High". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the supreme, not Allah. Also see 67/9c - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words, like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

504 94/8a: "- - - thy (people's/Muslims'/Muhammad's*) Lord (god*)- - -". Allah - if he exists and if he in case is a god, and not f.x. Iblis dressed up and cheating Muhammad - or an illness like TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) cheating him, like modern medical science suspects.

505 96/1a: "- - - thy (Muhammad's? Muslims'?*) Lord (Allah*) and Cherisher - - -". He cannot be a lord/god unless he exists, and he cannot be a cherisher unless he in addition is something powerful - good or bad.

506 98/8g: "- - - Lord and Cherisher". See 96/1a above.

507 99/5: "For that thy (Muhammad's/Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) have given her (Earth) inspiration". If Allah exists and has any power, neither of which is ever proved. Also this is animism or even anthropomorphism - things you normally find only in primitive religions and in fairy tales.

508 106/3: "- - - the Lord of this House - - -". Allah (then still called al-Lah by the majority, at least if the surah is from Mecca) and the Kabah in Mecca.

509 112/2: "Allah, the Eternal, Absolute - - -". Wrong unless he exists and in addition is something supernatural, white or black, none of which is proved. But according to the Bible Yahweh is the top - and the only one.

510 112/4: "And there is none like unto Him (Allah*)". See 112/1.

511 113/1a: “- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the Dawn - - -“. In reality Allah is not god for anything, unless he exists - - - and unless he in addition is a god.

512 114/1a: "(Allah is*) the Lord and Cherisher of Mankind - - -". If he exists, if he is a god, and if there is no other god caring for at least some parts of humanity - f.x. Yahweh, the old Jewish and Christian god who both the Bible and the Quran claim exists - though the Quran wrongly mixes him up with Allah.

513 114/1b: "(Allah is*) the Lord and Cherisher of Mankind - - -". Actually this is contradicted by the Bible, which says the lord is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c above - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

514 114/2: "(Allah is*) the King (or Ruler) of Mankind.". See 114/1a+b above.

515 114/3: “(Allah is*) The God (or Judge) of Mankind - - -”. A statement that is in no way proved. Actually it is rather disproved - especially the use of invalid lose words, invalid lose claims and statements, invalid and wrong “signs” and “proofs” does not point towards an omniscient god.

But perhaps it points towards a man - - - or even towards a devil in disguise, not wanting humans to find the right religion - if such one exists.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

It also is pretty thought provoking that f.x. all the errors, contradictions, wrong facts, etc., only and alone, in the Quran, prove 100% that there is no god behind that book. And that f.x. the fact that Jesus accepted OT as correct, proves to both Christians and Muslims that the OT was not falsified at that time - and that the Qumran scrolls prove that even OT was not falsified any time later, too.

It further is an insult to that possible god to "explain" that his texts means something different from what they really says = you are more clever than him at explaining what the god "really" meant, than the god is himself, even when he tries to explain things "clearly and easy to understand", and says his words are to be understood literally and without hidden meanings. Also only "the sick of heart" look for hidden meanings behind his words, according to the Quran - the very claimed hidden meanings the wise Muslims claim are what Allah really meant, but was unable to express clearly himself, so that they have to help the bumbling god and tell what he "really" tried to say. This in spite of that the Quran clearly states that meanings hidden behind Allah's clear and easy to understand words, only are possible for Allah to understand, and like said above are "only for the sick of heart" to look for.

May be as bad: To claim that the Quran means something different from what the texts clearly say, is to falsify and corrupt the quranic texts.

515 comments. Sub-total = 509 + 515 = 1024.


>>> Go to Next Chapter

>>> Go to Previous Chapter

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".