Allah in the Quran, Chapter 46


Chapter 46



001 Fear is one of the two main elements in many religions. On one side the hope for a good next life. On the other side the fear for punishment and the wrath of the god. Islam has its portions of both.

002 But how real is the threat of the god's claimed anger and wrath, in a religion built on a book not from any god (no god delivers a book of a quality like the Quran)? - and dictated by a man who believed in the use of dishonesty as a working tool, and liking respect, power, and riches for bribes for more power - and women? And a man who had his claimed, but never proved god as his only platform of power.

Finally: Always when you read the Quran, Hadiths, and other Islamic books, you should remember that Muhammad accepted the use of and himself used dishonesty in many forms in words and deeds. Even if the names are younger, it was he who institutionalized dishonesty like al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), Hilah (the lawful pretending/circumventing), the use of deceit ("war is deceit" - and "everything" is war), betrayal (f.x. the peace delegation from Khaybar), and even the disuse of oaths (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2 - and the star case 3/54 (if Allah could cheat, cheating is ok)), which also includes the disuse of words and promises, as they are weaker than oaths = when oaths can be disused, so can words and promises. On top of this it is very clear from the Quran and all other central Islamic books, that Muhammad also liked respect and power and women. Combine these lusts with his acceptance of and personal use of dishonesty - even the gravest kinds: How reliable is that kind of men normally? - and how true and reliable are their never proved claims and tales?

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

003 3/112a: "- - - the wrath of Allah - - -". If he exists and if he is something similar to what the Quran claims.

004 3/162b: "- - - the wrath of Allah - - -". Once more we are back to the old fact that the only claim for Allah's very existence, rests on a man believing in dishonesty when this paid, and on the same man's book full of mistakes, etc. If Allah does not exist, there is no wrath of Allah. And just to mention it: There never has been even one proved case of his wrath - many claims, but not one proved case. Not one. - and none for even his very existence.

005 5/60a: “Those who incurred the curse of Allah and his wrath, those of some he transformed into apes and swine - - -”. Hardly likely. This needs strong proofs. (This story Muhammad "borrowed" from an old legend.)

006 6/147a: "If they accuse thee (Muhammad*) of falsehood, say: 'Your Lord (Allah*) is full of Mercy all-embracing; but from people in guilt never will His wrath be turned back.'" Muhammad never was able to prove even a comma about Allah, or about his own connection to a god - even though it should have been easy for an omnipotent god to do so. He had to resort to fast words and explaining everything away. Here he uses a treats for waylaying the debate.

007 8/16a: “If any (Muslim warrior*) do turn his back to the (enemy*) on such a day (during battle) - - - he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is Hell - - - “. Fight for Allah and Muhammad or end in Hell. One verse is the carrot, this one the whip. War is a central part of the life and the religion - - - "the Religion of Peace"!!! (This claim is a joke for anyone who really has read the Quran with an open mind.)

008 8/16aa: “If any (Muslim warrior*) do turn his back to the (the enemy*) on such a day (during battle) - - - he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is Hell - - - “. Incompatible with NT. In reality also with OT as in OT the fighting was for securing a national territory, not to fight "holy" wars. Yahweh and Allah the same god? Jesus and Muhammad in the same line of prophets - if Muhammad had been a real prophet? Answers not necessary.

009 8/16b: “If any (Muslim warrior*) do turn his back to the (enemy*) on such a day (during battle) - - - he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is Hell - - - “. This also is mirrored in the sharia laws.

###010 12/107a: "Do they feel secure from the coming against them - - - the wrath of Allah - - -". Psychology - a leading question leading up to an expected "no" for an answer - Muhammad understood people. But yes: So much is wrong, etc. in the Quran, that it is clear there is no god behind it. Muhammad does not get the answer he tried to pressure from us (and all others). There is no doubt that Islam is a made up religion - there is no god behind a book of that quality (only the linguistics are good, and they were polished for some 250 years by top Muslim brains - at least top on linguistics, if not on logic.

Also (we quote): "'Surely' (etc.*) and rhetorical questions - whenever you encounter these in a text, stop and think. The author usually wants you to skate over them as if the claim is so obvious as to be beyond doubt, or the answer self-evident. The opposite is often the case." (Graham Lawton.) Try to count such cases in the Quran - they are MANY. Especially the never proved claim "the Truth" and similar are very often used.

011 14/21c: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". See 3/77b above.

012 16/45b: "- - - (do non-Muslims*) feel secure that Allah will not cause the earth to swallow them up, or that the Wrath (of Allah*) will not seize them - - -". Pep-talk from Muhammad to his followers.

###013 16/106a: "Anyone who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief (= doubt or wish to leave Islam*) - - - on them is Wrath from Allah - - -". It is prohibited not only to leave Islam (though many does so nowadays - f.x. in Indonesia), but even to doubt the teachings - full of mistaken facts or not. Here it is indicated that the punishment is for Allah - remember this is in 622 AD and Muhammad still is weak - it changed later. But you bet this verse counts for the ones who wish to "help" Allah with the punishment.

014 16/106e: "- - - Wrath from Allah - - -". There never has been any proved sample of wrath from Allah - not once.

015 17/57d: "- - - the Wrath of your (human's*) Lord (Allah*) is something to take heed of". See 3/77b and 17/57b above.

##016 17/97m: "- - - We (Allah*) shall increase for them (non-Muslims*) the fierceness of the (Hell*) Fire". - or (see 17/97l just above) is it a slip of the tongue of Allah, proving he is from the dark forces who rule Hell? Perhaps a dressed up Iblis/Devil cheating Muhammad? (Muhammad would have no chance to see the difference.)

017 20/81c: "- - - those on whom descends My (Allah's*) Wrath do perish indeed". Just a reminder: According to the Bible, the involved god was Yahweh, not Allah.

018 22/2c: "- - - dreadful will be the Wrath of Allah". If he exists and is a god - or something from the dark forces. And if he in case is correctly described among all the errors in the Quran.

019 29/29c: "- - - they (the people of Sodom and Gomorrah*) said: 'Bring us the Wrath of Allah - - -". How could this reliably be written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39a, 43/4b+c, 85/21+22) - a timeless book written by Allah before the creation of the world or perhaps existed since eternity, and revered by Allah and by his angels, a book of which the Quran is claimed to be an exact copy - how could this be written into this claimed book eons before it happened, if predestination was/is not 100% (and if there are 100% predestination, in spite of the Quran's never documented claims, free will for man is impossible even for an omniscient and omnipotent god - in the nonmaterial realms of life there are things impossible also for gods). And not less: What is the meaning, purpose and effect of prayers in Islam, if everything is predestined, like the Quran states most clearly several times?

020 29/29d: "Bring us (people of Sodom and Gomorrah*) the wrath of Allah if thou tellest the truth". Also in the old times people asked for proofs. Muhammad never was able to bring any, neither for his god nor for his own connection to a god (Sodom and Gomorrah is a proof for Yahweh if it is true, not for Allah).

021 47/28b: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". Something hypothetic if Allah does not exist or is not a major god. (Well, it may be real also if Allah belongs to the dark forces.)

022 48/6e: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". - has never been proved. Numbers of claims, but never a proof.

023 54/39b: "So taste ye (the people of Sodom and Gomorrah*) My (Allah's*) Wrath and My Warning". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it was Yahweh's wrath, not Allah's. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just lose claims and as lose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

024 58/14d: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". This does not exist unless Allah exists. And even if he should happen to exist, his wrath does not matter very much unless he is a major god - or a major devil. There never was a clear indication for that he even exists, not to mention for that he is a major god.

025 60/13d: "- - - the Wrath of Allah". Fiction if he does not exist and in addition is something supernatural - white of black.

026 104/6a: "(It is) the Fire of (the Wrath of) Allah kindled (to blaze) - - -". A number of Muslim scholars believe also Hell is part of Allah's work - Iblis/the Devil could not run Hell against the wish of an omnipotent god. This verse seems to confirm the idea.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

26 comments. Sub-total = 5448 + 26 = 5474.

>>> Go to  Next Chapter

>>> Go to  Previous Chapter

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".