1000+ Comments on the Quran: Surah 6 -- Al-An'am (The Cattle)

Revelation: Mecca, 621 AD (except 2-3 verses)

(See general comments on Surahs here: Introduction)


 

The quotes and comments

 

001 "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captured - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 6/1a: “Praise be to Allah - - -". Please see 1/1a above - is he worth it? (- if he exists).

003 6/1b: “Praise be to Allah, who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -.” Often claimed, never proved. This simply is one of the many claims in the Quran every believer in any religion can use on behalf of his god(s) free of charge, as long as he/she can evade all requests for proof. Also see 2/22d above and 21/56c below.

004 6/1c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

005 6/1d: “Praise be to Allah, who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -.” Contradicted by the Bible which claims Yahweh did this - both may be wrong (see 11/7a). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

006 6/1e: “Praise be to Allah, who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -.” And what does it look like? In short (included Earth, the Universe and living beings): According to the Quran the “everything” = this:

High above everything - above the 7. heaven - resides Allah.

Under him are the seven heavens – one on top of the other.

The heavens are from something material - if not one could not fasten the stars to one of them.

The heavens are held up by invisible pillars - if not they of course would fall down.

The heavens contains Paradise - and better the higher a Heaven (= closer to Allah).

The Paradise for normal good Muslims seems according to Hadiths to be in 1. heaven. It consists of 4 or 6 or more (exact number not clear) Gardens, one more luxurious than the other

In between the heavens are the sun and the moon (the sun is not said, only indicated to be just here).

Also the sun moves across the sky. (It in reality is the Earth that spins around.)

The sun raises in the east from the Earth, and sets in a pool of dirty water on Earth in the west.

The places for sunrise and sunset was found by Dhu'l Quarnayn = Alexander the Great.

Under the sun and moon, and fastened to the lowest of the 7 heavens, are all the stars. (The movements of the planets are not explained.)

Stars also are used as shooting stars to chase away bad spirits and jinns spying on Heaven.

Under the heavens and stars are clouds.

The clouds Allah sometimes breaks to pieces (raindrops).

Under the clouds the birds are kept aloof by only the will of Allah.

Then there is our flat Earth.

On the Earth mountains are set down - not grown up, but set down.

The Earth is kept steady by the mountains.

Without the steadying mountains Earth might start wobbling and tip around

(today Islam points to earth-quakes, but that was not the original meaning according to Muslim scholars of the old).

On "our" Earth are rivers. Hadiths tell that 2 of them - the Nile and the Euphrates - start in Paradise.

On Earth there further are highways - made by Allah.

On the Earth also all kinds of beings live – created from clay or something or nothing.

The first man was Adam - a single man - created in somewhere between 5 and 13 different ways*.

Under our Earth (Hadith) there are more flat Earths – 7 all together.

Islam has named for all the different Earths - and tells (in Hadiths) that the lower down, the more hellish life for the inhabitants.

And at the bottom (Hadith) is Hell.

Hell has seven gates, each leading to a separate part of Hell - one worse than the other.

* Modern Islamic literature seems to indicate that the official point of view of Islam is that man really was created by clay or similar.

Just like what your school and modern science tell you?

(This is one of the really strong and easy to see proofs for that the Quran is not made by an omniscient god - no omniscient god makes mistakes, and absolutely not of this quantity, magnitude and stupidity.)

007 6/1f: "- - - (Allah*) made the darkness and the light". The sun made and makes the light, and darkness just is lack of light. Also see 11/7a below.

008 6/1g: "- - - those who reject faith - - -". = One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

009 6/1h: "- - - faith - - -". = Islam - only Islam is faith according to the Quran.

010 6/1i: "- - - hold (others) equal with their Guardian-Lord (Allah*)". See 2/165c above and 25/18a below.

011 6/1j: (YA834): “- - - hold others as equal (“adala”) with their Guardian-Lord (Allah*).” But the Arab word “adala” has many meanings: A: Hold as equal. B: Balance nicely. C: Deal justly. D: To give compensation or reparation. E: (Hold) something as equivalent to something else. F: To give a just bias or proportion. G: To turn the balance the wrong way. Etc. Twist the text a little and get nearly what meaning you want. The text here in the Quran is nearly as crystal clear as texts come(?).

012 6/1k: "- - - Guardian-Lord (Allah*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which means that the guardian-Lord is Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

***013 6/2a: “He (Allah*) it is Who created you - - -”. Contradicted by the Bible who says it was Yahweh who did it - and they may both be wrong according to science. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

014 6/2b: “He (Allah*) is it who created you from clay - - -“. But how man was created, is complicated in the Quran; the one and first man - Adam - was made in no less than 13 different ways (or 5-6-7 if you say that some of them were different names for the same raw material). This even though one man cannot be created in more than one way. The Quran says he was made:

From clay:  6/2, 7/12, 17/61, 32/7, 38/71, 38/76.

From sounding clay:  15/26,  15/28,  15/33.

From ringing clay:  55/64

From sticky clay:  37/11

From essence of clay:  23/12

From mud:  15/26,  15/28,  15/33.

From dust: 3/59, 22/5, 35/11, 40/67.

From earth: 20/55

From a clot of congealed blood: 96/2

From semen: 16/4, 75/37, 76/2, 80/19.

From nothing: 19/9, 19/67.

From water: 21/30, 24/45, 25/54.

From base material: 70/39.

#(It is not told where the semen came from).**

** Mostly when the book talks about semen, it is in connection with (making) children. But also children are not made from semen - it only is 50% of the truth. A child is made from semen + an egg cell, but an egg cell is so small, that Muhammad did not know about it - human eggs can hardly be seen in the blood and gore in a carcass or a slaughtered animal. Actually at the time of Muhammad one did not know how conception happened - one theory was that semen was a seed that grew when placed in a woman - though far from each time. Strangely this is how the Quran explains it. Any god had known better.

Strictly speaking all the different ways of creating man/Adam, means that the Quran tells that man/Adam was created in 13 different ways, even if Adam was created only once (in reality he never was created and never existed – man developed from earlier primates). If one lump similar “creations” together, there still remains at least 5-7 different creations. Only one can even according to the Quran be right (as Adam was created only once even according to the Quran and to the Bible) - and the irony is that science long since has shown that all alternatives are wrong, as man as said evolved from a prehistoric primate.

Some Muslims explain that Adam was created from a little clay, a little dust, a little earth, a little blood, a little semen, a little nothing and some water. But that is far from what the Quran tells - and even if it were the true story of the Quran, it is wrong. For one thing man does not consist of clay, etc., and for another he as mentioned was not created, but developed from prehistoric beings.

(Yes, we know about the Eve from archaeology who lived in East Africa some 160ooo - 200ooo years ago, and the corresponding Adam that lived in Asia some 60ooo - 70ooo (64ooo?) years ago, but that is something different).

Contradicting even 3. form primary school knowledge.

***015 6/2c: “He (Allah*) it is Who created you from clay - - -”. This is one of the many ways man (Adam) was created according to the Quran - even if Adam was created only once, according to that book. See 6/2b and 21/56c below.

016 6/2d: “- - - and then (Allah*) decreed a stated term (for you).” Predestination once more. From other places (Hadiths) we know that your “stated term” (= how long you are to live) is decided by Allah when the fetus is 4 months old = 5 months before you are born. Which means you can as well go to war for Muhammad and perhaps become rich by looting, because you will die at a predestined day no matter. A related claim: At the same time as Allah decided your time of death, he also according to Hadiths decided whether you were to end in Paradise of Hell, and there is nothing you can do to change that diction. Any comments about f.x. a benevolent god or free will for man?

017 6/2e: "And there is in His (Allah's*) presence another determined term - - -". One more point of unclear language in the Quran according to Muslim scholars: Does also this refer to the end of your life, or does it refer to the Day of Doom? Muslim scholars disagree. Clear language in the Quran? (Day of Doom is most likely.)

018 6/2f: "- - - yet ye (people*) doubt within yourselves!" Wrong - we have no doubt: With so much wrong in the book, the Quran is not from a god.

019 6/3a: "- - - heavens - - -". Plural and wrong. This refers to the 7 (material) heavens Islam believes in, but there are no 7 heavens.

020 6/3b: "He (Allah*) knoweth what ye hide, and what ye reveal - - -". The Quran makes it clear that Allah knows absolutely everything. But see 2/233h above.

021 6/3c: "- - - He (Allah*) knoweth the (recompense) which ye (people*) earn (by your deeds)". Then why - WHY - does he need to test his followers and others to find out what he already knows??! This even more so as he decides everything which happens according to the Quran! There is no logic in this. Also see 2/233f above.

022 6/3d: "- - - He (Allah*) knoweth the (recompense) which ye (people*) earn (by your deeds)". Of course he knows if it is true like the Hadiths tell that Allah decides whether you are to end in Hell or Paradise 5 months before you are born, and that nothing you do can change this diction - then he of course know all the time where you will end.

023 6/4: "- - - signs - - -". "Signs" is "Quran-speak" for indication or proof for Allah. There exists not one single valid such one in the whole Quran, or anywhere else in Islam, as it never is proved first that it really is caused by Allah. Any priest in any religion can say exactly the same about his god(s). Words and claims are that cheap.

024 6/5a: “And now they (non-Muslims*) reject the truth (the Quran*) - - -“. With that many mistakes, etc. the Quran at best is partly the truth. Also see 13/1g and 40/75 below.

025 6/5b: “And now they (man/wrongdoers*) reject the truth (Muhammad’s teachings*) when it reaches them: - - - “. May be the real reason was that they saw that something was seriously wrong f. ex. when Muhammad claimed his new religion was from the same god as the Jews' and Christians' god.

026 6/5c: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

027 6/5d: "- - - soon they (non-Muslims*) shall learn the reality of what they used to mock at". One thing is that this just is pep-talk - a well-known technique even. Another is that many non-Muslims already knew the reality; that the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god. No god ever was involved in a book of that quality.

028 6/6a: "See they (non-Muslims*) not how many of those before them We (Allah*) did destroy?" There were scattered ruins in and around Arabia and there were legends about earlier people. Muhammad told that all of them had been destroyed by Allah as punishment for sins. Science tells there are many other possible reasons for a house or a hamlet or a village or a town to become empty in a harsh, warlike area.

As normal in the Quran this claim is put forth without a proof. It is tempting to quote Christopher Hitchens: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" - they have to bring proof to be believed by rational minds.

029 6/6b: "- - - We (Allah*) poured out rain from the skies - - -". Often claimed, never proved. This is one of the many natural phenomena Muhammad claims for his god. See 11/7a below.

030 6/6c: "- - - for their sins We (Allah*) destroyed them (claimed no-good people*) - - -". See 6/6c above.

031 6/6d: "- - - raised in their (died out, killed or moved earlier people*) wake fresh generations (to succeed them)". But A6/5 explains: The Arab word "quarn", which here is translated with "generations", more often means "an epoch", or people belonging to one particular epoch" or "civilization" (in the historical sense of that word)". Like so often in the Quran, the language is not clear and distinct.

032 6/7a: “If We (Allah*) had sent unto thee (Muhammad*) a written (message) on parchment, so that they (Muslims and non-Muslims*) could touch it with their hands, the Unbelievers have been sure to say: ’This is nothing but obvious magic!’” Muhammad never ever was able to prove anything about what he told his mostly naïve and uneducated audience. But he got questions about and demands for such proofs many times from followers and others – this is mentioned repeatedly in the Quran. He had to evade those requests and demands, and an obvious way was to find ways of explaining them away. Here the technique he uses is “No matter what proofs I produce, they will not believe anyhow, so why produce proofs at all?” Swindlers and cheats frequently use such techniques. It is obvious for anyone able to think for himself or herself that the logic is twisted and wrong – but the ones wanting to believe or the very naïve might believe in it. What is more serious is that Muhammad was an intelligent man and a man knowing a lot about how to treat and sway people. There is no way he did not know he used twisted logic and dishonest psychology and story, and that a real miracle - or more than one - had made new believers, even if some would try to call it magic. And no way that he did not know that if he produced real evidence that would strengthen his followers enormously and make huge numbers of unbelievers become believers. In a short sentence: There is no way an intelligent man did not know this excuse was a lie.

033 6/7b: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". = Non-Muslims - only Muslims are believers according to the Quran.

034 6/8a: “They (people*) say: ’Why is not an angel sent down to him (to Muhammad to prove his religion*)”. So many angels that Allah is said in the Quran to send up and down each day (even though it says differently later in this verse - inconsistency), this would be an easy proof. But: See 6/7a above and 6/8b just below).

035 6/8b: “They (people*) say: ’Why is not an angel sent down to him (to Muhammad to prove his religion*)”. One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

036 6/8c: “They (people*) say: ‘Why is not an angel sent down to him?’ If We (Allah*) did send down an angel, the matter would be settled at once, and no respite would be granted them”. This question – a proof f.x. by means of an angel – arose frequently. Muhammad’s often used “explanation” was this: Allah will not send down an angel until The Last Day (the Day of Doom). That means that if he sends down angles, that day becomes the Last Day (“the matter will be settled at once, and no respite would be granted them”), and in that case the unbelievers would lose their chance to become believers (“- - - no respite would be granted them”.) This “explanation” is nonsense even according to the Quran. That book tells that the angel Gabriel visited Muhammad often, it tells that angels come down to fetch the souls of the dead, it tells that angels come down to fetch your soul when you fall asleep and to return it when you wakes up, it tells that angels surround you to note down your good and bad deeds – not to mention the thousands of angels Allah sends down to do battles together with Muslims time and again. And angels visiting f. ex. Abraham, Lot, and Mary.

There was not one single reason why Allah could not use one of the myriads of angles he daily and frequently sends down as a proof for Muhammad.

On the contrary: There were all reasons for Allah to prove himself and his claimed messenger - in stark contradiction to Muhammad's claim, it had given lots of followers. Proofs: 1) Human psychology. 2) The Pharaoh's sorcerers all became Muslims because Moses made a miracle (a story which proves Muhammad knew he was lying when he said miracles would convince no-one. 3) Jesus made miracles and got many followers from this, which Muhammad knew.

A very obvious bluff and a piece of fast-talk.

037 6/9a: "- - - We (Allah*) should have sent him (the angel*) as a man - - -". Why? A real angel would make quite another impression. But even as a man - why not? If this "man" could prove he was an angel, it would make a huge impression, and there is no way Muhammad did not know this. More explaining away from Muhammad about why he could prove not one single sentence of his claims about connection to a god - or the existence of the god. Worse: There is no way Muhammad did not know this was an invalid - and thus dishonest - explaining away.

038 6/9b: “If We (Allah*) had made it (the proof*) an angel, We should have sent him as a man, and We (= our proof/angel*) should certainly have caused them confusion in a matter (religion*) which they have already covered with confusion.”

There is no reason for Allah to camouflage an angel like a man. Allah is omnipotent and could send them in any shape he wanted. This argument is invalid.

The arrival of an angel – no matter in what gestalt as long as it was clear it was an angel – might only confuse the most skeptical ones. All the other would become believers.

Any intelligent man understanding people would know all this. Not to mention that any god, however tiny, would be sure to know it. Muhammad knew this was fast-talk – by himself, by a helper (if the Quran was made by a helper like some rumors said), or by the dark forces if they were behind the Quran, or by Allah (if the Quran – or this piece of it – really was made by Allah). Muhammad was too intelligent and knew too much about people – he knew this was a lie – both that an angle had to look like a man, and that no unbeliever would believe if they got real proofs.

039 6/9c: “If We (Allah*) had made it (the proof*) an angel, We should have sent him as a man, and We (= our proof/angel*) should certainly have caused them confusion in a matter (religion*) which they have already covered with confusion.” Actually this is contradicted by Hadiths, which tell that Muhammad saw Gabriel - an angel - and he had 600 wings. Not much like a man. (But we man add that you nowhere in the Bible find angels described with wings - seraphs, yes, cherubs, yes, angels, no. Angels in Christian art got wings around 300 AD, simply because it was the only way of flying the artists at that time knew - but Muhammad gave his angel Gabriel 600 wings (which aerodynamically is hopeless for flying,))

040 6/10a: "Mocked were (many) Messengers before thee (Muhammad*) - - -". Muhammad was mocked. By claiming this was more or less normal for prophets, he tried to reduce the effect of the mocking - and quite likely succeeded, at least among his followers. This kind of arguments has such effect.

041 6/10b: "- - - but their (former prophets*) scoffers were hemmed in by the thing that they mocked". The meaning here is that the scoffers met their punishment and the mocked prophets from the earlier times won in the end. If it is true like the Quran claims that there had been 124ooo prophets before Muhammad (the number is from Hadiths), and with the exception of a few Jewish ones not one single of them left even a tiny trace of their preaching and work, whereas their contemporary scoffers went on living like before, this claim simply is not true.

*042 6/11a: “Travel through the earth and see what was the end of those who rejected the Truth”. Scattered around in Arabia and neighboring countries there were ruins of old houses, villages and towns, and there also were folk tales about older tribes and people now gone. Muhammad told these were the remains and rumors left by people destroyed by Allah because of not believing in or sins against Allah - which hardly is true in most cases. To tell the truth: Not one serious professor of history believes in this. And not one serious scientific book about history mentions such claims as a credible reason for why houses or villages or towns or cities became empty. It will take heavy proofs from Islam to convince them.

043 6/11b: “- - - see what was the end of those who rejected the Truth”. The truth is not more reliable here than in f. ex. 6/5 and 6/11. Also see 6/6 and 13/1g.

044 6/11c: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b above, and 13/1g and 40/75 below.

045 6/12a: "'To whom belongeth all that is in the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth?' Say: 'To Allah'". Often claimed, never proved - and one of those things any believer in any religion can say about his god(s) free of charge, as long as he/she can evade all requests for proofs, as loose words and claims are that cheap.

046 6/12b: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

047 6/12c: "'To whom belongeth all that is in the heavens and on Earth? Say: 'To Allah'". Contradicted by the Bible which says it belongs to Yahweh (and a number of other religions say it belongs to their gods). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

048 6/12d: "He (Allah*) hath inscribed for Himself (the rule of) Mercy." See 1/1a and 2/233g above. A rule of mercy? In cases where populist words shall cover harsh realities, we always believe the realities.

049 6/12e: "He (Allah*) hath inscribed for Himself (the rule of) Mercy". How much mercy is to be found concerning non-Muslims in the surahs from Medina? - the ones which really counts, as they are the youngest ones, and thus the ones which mainly are not abrogated (made invalid).

050 6/12f: “That He (Allah*) will gather you together for the Day of Judgment, there is no doubt whatever.” With so many mistakes, contradictions, so much wrong logic in the teachings, there is serious doubt about anything in the Quran and in Islam – and with a good reason – included the so-called last day and judgment by a god like Allah. Besides it is contradicted by the Bible, which claims this will be the job of Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

051 6/12g: "- - - no doubt - - -". See 2/2b above.

052 6/12h: "It is they who have lost their souls, that will not believe". As far as Jews and Christians go, this is contradicted by the Bible. There also is a serious question about the Muslims’ souls, as it is clear that the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

053 6/13a: "To Him (Allah*) belonged all (living beings*) - - -." One more of the many never documented claims. Keep your eyes open and your brain and knowledge engaged, and you will find many such ones in the Quran. Islam will have to prove them to be believed by us. It is again tempting to quote Christopher Hitchens: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" - they have to bring proof to be believed by rational minds.

054 6/13b: (YA845): “- - - all that dwelleth (or lurketh) in the Night and the Day.” But the Arab word “sakana” has many meanings: A: To dwell. B: To rest. C: To be still. D: To stop. E: To lurk. F: To quiescent. And may be more. Any comments needed about clarity in the Quran?

055 6/13c: "For He (Allah*) is the One Who heareth and knoweth all things." Just a reminder to Muslims: Stay in line! Also see 2/233h above.

056 6/14a: "- - - Allah, the maker of the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth - - -". One more of the many never documented claims. Keep your eyes open and your brain and knowledge engaged, and you will find many such ones in the Quran. Islam will have to prove them to be believed by us.

057 6/14b: "- - - Allah, the maker of the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh did this - and according to science, both may be wrong as may be nature did this itself. Also see 11/7a below. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

058 6/14c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

059 6/14d: “But I (Muhammad*) am commanded to be the first of those who bow to Allah (in Islam) - - -“. This obviously is wrong according to Islam (though in reality it may be 100% correct - may well be that Muhammad was the very first Muslim), as the Quran claims that many were Muslims before Muhammad. (Muslims often claim - as "always" without documentation - that what the Quran really means here, is the first of a group, in this case the Arabs. But for one thing at least the claimed prophets Hud and Salih were good Muslims according to the Quran, and both lived in Arabia before Muhammad - even before Moses, as Moses mentioned them according to the Quran. For another thing that is not what the Quran says - it nowhere indicates that it means the first of a group, but the first. And the language in the Quran is perfect and not to be misunderstood according to Islam. Besides: If the book here means something else than what is clearly said, how many other places in the Quran does it mean something other than what the text really says? Other Muslims claim it means the first in quality. But in a book with perfect and unmistakable language that would be written "I am the best of those - - -."

Well, it is contradicted by at least:

2/37: “Then learnt Adam from his Lord (Allah*) the words of inspiration (the Quran*) - - -.” It is clear that according to the Quran, Adam was the first Muslim (even though he according to science never existed, as man developed from earlier primates) – and then the first to bow to Allah in Islam.

2/127-132: This is too long to quote, but it is clear that according to the Quran Abraham was a devoted Muslim and bowed to Allah in Islam long before Muhammad. This verse thus clearly contradicts the verse 6/14 and some others in one of the two possible meanings of that verse.

3/67: “Abraham - - - bowed his will to Allah’s (which is Islam) - - -.”

4/163: “We (Allah*) have sent thee (Muhammad*) the inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the messengers after him: We sent it to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the tribes (the Jews?), to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms.” It is very clear that according to the Quran there were many Muslims who of course bowed to Allah in Islam before Muhammad.

7/143: “(Moses said*) “- - - and I am the first to believe.” Obviously only one could be the first.

26/51: Pharaoh’s magicians said: “Only, our desire is that we shall but return to our Lord (Allah*), and that we may become foremost among the Believers”. One more group of devote Muslims (according to the Quran) practically 2000 years before Muhammad.

If Muhammad meant he was the first in time to bow to Allah, he may well have spoken the very truth if the Quran is wrong also on this point, but according to the Quran, what he in that case said, was very wrong.

If he meant he was the foremost among 'unequals', he may according to the Quran have been right - - - though persons like Abraham and Moses might have wanted a debate about just that – and with Jesus as a strong outsider (also he was a Muslim according to the Quran), as he clearly was a much greater prophet than Muhammad. Muhammad did not have the gift of making real prophesies – the minimum requirement for being a real prophet. Neither was he able to make or have made miracles. According to both the Bible and the Quran Jesus was good at both. And when Muhammad in reality was no prophet at all, whereas Jesus was a great one – still according to both books – there is no doubt who was the greatest prophet.

Islam/Muslims may debate Muhammad’s other titles – Messenger and Apostle – but as for who was the greatest prophet, there is no doubt at all in spite of all the claims from Islam.

(6 contradictions).

060 6/14e: "- - - those who joins gods with Allah". = Non-Muslims.

061 6/14f: "- - - joins gods with Allah". See 25/18a below.

062 6/15a: "I (Muhammad*) would, if I disobeyed my Lord (Allah*), indeed have fear of the Penalty - - -". Only if Allah exists and is correctly described in the Quran. But if f.x. the book is made up, what had Muhammad to fear if he knew it?

063 6/15b: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

064 6/15c: "- - - a Mighty Day". = The Day of Doom.

065 6/16: "- - - Allah's Mercy - - -". See 1/1a above.

066 6/17: "He (Allah*) hath power over all things." Well, that is Muhammad's many times repeated but not documented claim - which Allah was totally unable (or unwilling ?) to prove, even if it obviously would have worked (in spite om Muhammad's words to the opposite - one of the times when Muhammad clearly knows he is lying in the Quran, as he was too intelligent to believe this himself. This even more so as he told about the sorcerers of the Pharaoh and about listeners to Jesus being influenced by miracles).

067 6/18a: "He (Allah*) is the Irresistible - - -". One more of the never proved claims any believer can make free of charge on behalf of his god(s) is he/she can evade any requests for proofs. Words are that cheap.

068 6/18b: "- - - (Allah is looking at you from above*), and He is the Wise, acquainted with all things." Mind your steps - and be obedient - - - which on Earth meant obedient to Muhammad in reality". Also see 2/233h above.

069 6/18c: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Wise - - -". Not if the Quran with all its wrongs is representative for his knowledge and intelligence.

070 6/18d: "- - - He (Allah*) is - - - acquainted with all things". See 2/233h above.

071 6/19a: “’What thing is the most weighty in evidence (of the Quran*)?’ Say: ’Allah is witness between me (Mohammad*) and you (Muslims*) - - -”.

It is nowhere proved that Allah had anything to do with the Quran - on the contrary: All the mistakes etc. in the book prove that no god was involved, at least no omniscient one.

Can a book with that many mistakes, loose statements and invalid “signs” and “proofs” really be evidence for anything at all? - except an evidence for that something is wrong? And this verse 6/19 tells it is the weightiest evidence for Allah! (An invalid claim if not Allah really did witness.)

A claimed witness from Allah has no value if Allah did not really witness and in an indisputable way.

072 6/19b: "Allah is witness between me (Mohammad*) and you (Muslims*) - - -”. Not unless he exists - a witness who does not exist, is no witness.

073 6/19c: "- - - this Quran hath been revealed to me (Muhammad*) by inspiration - - -”. Information transferred "by inspiration" is a very unreliable way, as it is impossible to know from where the inspiration came - one may believe, but not know. It also is very convenient to claim inspiration if one needs or wants to add a little - some texts in the Quran has nothing to do in holy books, but were very convenient for Muhammad. It also is contradicted by the Bible: (4. Mos. 12/6) "When a prophet of the Lord, I (Yahweh*) reveal myself to him in visions, I speak to him in dreams, (or sometimes speak to him directly*)" - there never in the whole Bible is mentioned "by inspiration" in such cases. Also see 26/52a below. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

074 6/19d: "- - - revealed - - -". See 4/47c and 5/9a above, and 15/1b below.

075 6/19e: "- - - in truth - - -". There are so many mistakes, etc. in the Quran, that one cannot just believe what it claims is true - proofs in addition are necessary. See 2/2b above and 13/1g and 40/75 below.

076 6/19f: "Can ye possibly bear witness that besides Allah there is another God?". The expression "besides Allah" demands that Allah really exists. This is nowhere proved - there only are Muhammad's not too reliable words and claims for this. The expression is invalid unless it is proved that Allah exists.

077 6/19g: "Can ye possibly bear witness that besides Allah there is another God?". This is typical for Muhammad's technique of debating - he claims without even trying to prove it that Allah exists, but just states it as a "fact", and then demands proofs form everyone else for anything. "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" - Islam will have to bring proofs to be believe by rational brains, especially as the one making the claim was such an unreliable and immoral man. (Read the Quran - skip the cheap, glorious words and read the reality; what he demanded and did, his view on the use of dishonesty and what moral rules he introduced - before you protest.)

078 6/19h: "- - - in truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

079 6/19i: "- - - He (Allah*) is the One God - - -". For one thing: The Quran is not more reliable than that its claims have to be proved - and the Quran never is able to prove anything. For another thing: The Bible talks about Yahweh (and other books about other gods). As Yahweh and Allah is not the same god - too fundamentally too different teachings - there either has to be more than one god, or at least one of the two (not to mention claims about other gods) cannot exist. (And a small point here: Yahweh has proved his existences and his power according to both the Bible and to the Quran - Allah has proved absolutely nothing.)

080 6/19j: "- - - truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

081 6/19k: "- - - blasphemy - - -". To disbelieve in Allah only is blasphemy if Allah really exists and really is what the Quran claims, but never was able to prove - there only are the words of a not very reliable man, who on top of all had much to gain from making people believe in his tales. At least it is very clear that there is no god behind a book so full of mistakes, etc. as the Quran - and what then about the claims about Allah?

082 6/19l: "Truly I (Muhammad*) am innocent of - - - joining gods with Him (Allah*)". A very relevant question for Muslims here is: Is he innocent of making up Allah?

083 6/19m: "- - - joining others (other gods*) with Him (Allah*)". Not with him - instead of him. See 2/165c above and 25/18a below

084 6/20a: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (here the Bible*) - - -". = Jews, Christians, Sabeans.

085 6/20b: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book know this (that the Quran was revealed to Muhammad, etc*) as they know their own sons”. Very wrong – they had lots of reasons to suspect that something was wrong – very wrong – with both Muhammad and with his religion. F.x. too many points that differed from the Bible/Torah (which Muhammad claimed were from the same religion) and too many other mistakes. Islam will have to prove this claim to be believed.

086 6/20c: (YA850): “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (Jews, Christians*) know this as they know their own sons.” But “this” instead here may mean “him” – the Arab word has double meaning. Then the meaning becomes: “- - - know him (Muhammad) as - - -.” A tiny wee bit different. Clear language in the Quran?

087 6/20d: "Those who have lost their own souls - - -". One of the many negative and discriminating names Muhammad has for non-Muslims - here mainly Jews and Christians.

088 6/20e: "(Jews and Christians*) refuse therefore (because of their blasphemy*) to believe". Wrong. The reason was that they easily and clearly saw that Muhammad was not telling the truth when he claimed that Yahweh and Allah was the same god, and further claimed that their religions and Islam was the same religion.

089 6/21a: “Who doth more wrong than he (non-Muslim*) who invented a lie (said something else than Muhammad*) against Allah and His Signs (none of whom is logically valid proofs*)?” No, it is not possible to be more wrong than the non-Muslims. “We” (the Muslims) are morally and in other ways far superior. But: Do Islam really have a moral or ethical philosophy? - in any case we have never met it. They have some commandments and a codex from Muhammad - and some of them are horrible - and that is all we have found. Islam f.x. is the only one of the big religions which accepts the use of dishonesty and lies, etc. as a working tool.

090 6/21b: "Who doth more wrong than he who invented a lie (said something else than Muhammad*) against Allah - - -". But is it a lie against Allah if Allah - and the Quran - is invented? (He has not one single time proved himself, and the Quran is full of mistakes). Well, at least it is not a lie against Allah if Allah does not exist.

091 6/21c: “- - - His (Allah's*) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

092 6/21d: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

093 6/21e: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". Normally "Quran-speak" for non-Muslims.

094 6/22a: "One Day (the Day of Doom*) shall We (Allah*) gather them all (humans*) together - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it is Yahweh who is going to do this. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

095 6/22b: "We (Allah*) shall say to (non-Muslims*) - - -". This only will be the case if Allah exists and if he really is a god like the Quran claims.

096 6/22c: "- - - the partners (to Us (Allah*)) - - -". For most non-Muslims the fact was that they had another god or other gods, not that they had gods in addition to Allah - a technique of debating where one tries to make the opposite part forget that one’s argument only is a claim, not a fact - one meets this technique many places in the Quran (Muhammad was intelligent and smart). Also see 25/18a below - and 2/165c above.

097 6/22d: "- - - the partners (to Us (Allah*)) - - -". Here other gods.

098 6/22e: "- - - the partners (to Us (Allah*)) whom ye (non-Muslims*) (invented and) talked about - - -". The big question here is, however: Is also Allah an invented god? As the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god, that is highly likely.

099 6/23a: "- - - joined gods with Allah". See 25/18a below.

100 6/23b: (YA851): “- - - no subterfuge (“fitnah”) for them - - -.” But the Arab word “fitnah” has many meanings: A: Trouble. B: Tumult. C: Oppression. D: Persecution. E: Discord. F: Subterfuge. And more. To find an interpretation you like, just choose the meaning you like. Then all becomes crystal clear. Clear language in the Quran?

101 6/24a: "- - - they lie against their own souls - - -". They lie knowingly and will hurt their future in the claimed next life. At least this is what Muhammad claimed.

102 6/24b: "- - - the (lie) which they non-Muslims*) invented - - -". But what if their beliefs - at least for some of them - were not invented? As the Quran is not from a god, unproved claims there are not reliable. (And for that case: What about Muslims if the Quran is an invented book? - the fact that a book with so much wrong facts, etc. is not from a god makes this a disturbing possibility, not to say probability.)

103 6/24c: "But the (lie) which they (non-Muslims*) invented will leave them in the lurch". This i typical kind of pep-talk religious - and sometimes political and other - leaders frequently use. "The others will lose and we will win". It works well among believers and often among others with little knowledge (among people with knowledge it only works if it is likely the claim is true - in this case it did not work among f.x. the local Jews who know something was much wrong with Muhammad's teaching, and thus that thus it was unlikely the claim was correct).

104 6/25a: "- - - We (Allah*) hath thrown a veil on their hearts, so they understand it not - - -". Allah often denies people the possibilities of finding Islam and believing in it. And then he sends them to Hell as sinners. A fair and benevolent god? - compare to f.x. "The Lost Lamb" or "- - - in the 11. hour - - -" (Luke 15/8-10 and 15/11-31, Matt. 18/12-14 and 20/8-13) in NT: Definitely not the same god as Allah. (Islam often tries to explain that it is the person who is the really guilty one, not Allah, because Allah doing things like this grates against claims that Allah is a good and benevolent god. But when they make such explanations, they never mention the fact that according to MANY places in the Quran, Allah decides and predestines everything which happens in the world - and thus everything you do. Thus there is no rational way of getting around what is told here: Allah denies you the possibility to find the way to Paradise if he just decides so.

105 6/25b: "- - - if they (non-Muslims*) saw every one of the Signs (intended to mean indication or proof for Allah*), they would not believe in them - - -". Which far from is strange, as there is not one single sign in all the Quran or anywhere else which proves there is a god, not to mention proves that the claimed god in case is Allah. Any believer in any religion can disuse the claimed signs on behalf of his/her god just as easily and cheaply as Muhammad did. In not one single case it is proved that it is Allah who is behind the phenomena Muhammad uses as "signs", and thus the claims are invalid. (There is a possible exception for some of the signs "borrowed" from the Bible, and where there were witnesses, but they in case prove Yahweh, not Allah.)

106 6/25c: "- - - Signs - - -". Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

107 6/25d: "The Unbelievers say: 'These (the tales in the Quran*) are nothing but tales of the ancient.'" One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

108 6/25e: "- - - the Unbelievers - - -". One of Muhammad's many - to Muslims - negative names for non-Muslims.

109 6/25f: "The Unbelievers (non-Muslims contemporary of Muhammad*) say: 'These (the tales in the Quran*) are nothing but tales of the ancient.'" A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

110 6/25g: "These (the tales in the Quran*) are nothing but tales of the ancient." This skeptic's had good reason to say. None of the tales in the Quran is made by any god - and hardly any even by Muhammad. They practically without exception are histories, legends, fairy tales, etc. which were known or well known in Arabia at that time. Muhammad just "borrowed" them, twisted them some, and told he had got that version from Allah. But we honestly doubt an omniscient god was unable to tell his own tales - and if he had to borrow from Earth, why only from in and around Arabia if he wanted to be god for the whole Earth? Only if humans in Arabia made the verses and surahs that was necessary.

111 6/26: "- - - they (disbelievers*) only destroy their own souls (by not believing in Allah*) - - -". This only is true if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about everything. If f.x. Allah is a made up god, and the disbelievers also believe in other gods which do not exist, it does not matter if also Allah exists or not, or is not the god described in the Quran. And if they on the other hand happen to believe in a god who exists, the Quran's claim here is very wrong.

112 6/27a: "If thou (Muslims`) couldst but see them when they (non-Muslims*) when they are confronted with the Fire!" Psychological pep-talk of a standard kind frequently used by religious and other leaders: "Just wait and see; "they" will be the losers and "we" the winners - and "they" will fare badly. An ever so well known technique - but it often works. You meet this kind of pep-talk MANY places in the Quran - we mention just some of them.

113 6/27b: "- - - the Fire - - -". = Hell.

114 6/27c: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

115 6/28a: "- - - in their (non-Muslims'*) eyes will become manifest what before they concealed". Only if the Quran tells the full and only truth, and definitely not if the non-Muslims believe in a perhaps existing god like f.x. Yahweh. Also see 6/24c above.

116 6/28b: "- - - manifest - - -". See 2/2b above.

##117 6/28c: "But if they (sinners in Hell*) were returned (to a second chance on Earth*), they would certainly relapse to the things they were forbidden - - -". This is one more of the places in the Quran where Muhammad knew he was lying. There is not one chance that a man as intelligent and with so much knowledge about people as Muhammad, did not know that after really experiencing a place like Hell, each and everybody would do their outmost not to end there again - and after such a terrifying lesson, most of them would succeed. This even more so as such an experience would make more or less all of them believers, as they had got a solid proof for that the religion was true. It is nearly incredible that intelligent people - not to mention educated modern people of today - are able to believe a claim like this.

118 6/28d: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are indeed liars". At least a clear message to Muhammad's followers - if it is true, is another question. Besides it is an ironic message from the only of the big religions which accepts lies in the religion (f.x. Muhammad was too intelligent not to know he was lying when he claimed miracles would not make people believe - but he needed to explain away the lack of proofs for Allah), and as work tools - f.x. al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth) and worse.

119 6/28e: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

120 6/29a: "And they (non-Muslims contemporary of Muhammad*) (sometimes) say: 'There is nothing except our life on this earth, and never shall we be raised up again.'" A historical anomaly - see 4/13d below.

121 6/29b: "And they (non-Muslims contemporary of Muhammad*) (sometimes) say: 'There is nothing except our life on this earth, and never shall we be raised up again.'" One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

122 6/29-31: Pep-talk to followers: See how badly "they" are going to fare - we are better.

123 6/30a: "- - - the Truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

124 6/30b: "Taste ye (non-Muslims*) the Penalty - - -". See 3/77b above.

125 6/30c: "- - - Faith". = Islam - only Islam is faith according to the Quran.

126 6/31a: "Lost indeed are they who treat it as a falsehood that they (humans*) must meet Allah - - -". They are lost only if the Quran is from a god, if that god is Allah, and if it in addition the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

127 6/31b: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

128 6/31c: "Lost indeed are they who treat it as a falsehood that they (humans*) must meet Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims they must meet Yahweh. Also the Bible states that the ones believing in Yahweh and following his teaching, are not lost. Whereas Muslims and Muhammad are not mentioned in the Bible at all, not to mention as believers. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

129 6/31d: "- - - a falsehood that they (humans*) must meet Allah - - -". One of the Quran's many, many never documented claims. Claims without proofs can be contradicted without proofs - they are invalid.

130 6/31e: "- - - falsehood - - -". See 2/2b above.

131 6/31f: "'Woe unto us (non-Muslims*) that we took no thought of it;' for they bear their burdens on their backs, and evil indeed are the burdens that they bear". One of Muhammad's many pep-talks. (The main thing with pep-talks is not to be true, but to make followers believe it is true and good for them or bad for the opposition).

132 6/31g: "- - - the hour - - -". The Day of Doom.

133 6/32a: "But best is the Home in the Hereafter - - -". This may be true if there really is a god somewhere - but only for the ones who believe in a real god. An interesting point, as according to both the Bible and the Quran both Yahweh and Jesus have proved they are or are involved in something supernatural, whereas the only thing Allah and Muhammad have proved is that they have been unable to bring forth one single real proof, and instead resorts to unproved claims and logically invalid "proofs" - the hallmark of cheats, deceivers and swindlers.

134 6/32b: "- - - righteous". beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

135 6/32c: "Will they (non-Muslims*) not understand?" But that was just what at least some of them understood very clearly; that there were so big and so fundamental differences between the Bible and the Quran, that Yahweh and Allah were not the same god. 

136 6/33a: "- - - it is not thee (Muhammad*) they (non-Muslims*) reject - - -". Wrong. They also rejected Muhammad.

137 6/33b: "- - - the Signs of Allah, which the wicked condemn". When you know that there does not exist one single sign which really proves Allah - are they then wicked or intelligent?

138 6/33c: "- - - the wicked - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims - here in a very clear word.

139 6/33d: “- - - Signs of Allah - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

140 6/33e: "- - - the wicked - - -". One of the many negative and discriminating names Muhammad had for non-Muslims. No wonder many Muslims do not want unnecessary contact with non-Muslims, and that some have a superiority complex towards them.

141 6/34a: "Rejected were the Messengers before thee (Muhammad*) - - -." Muhammad was rejected by many. But cheer up: Rejection was normal for real prophets! - "ergo" Muhammad is consequently a prophet like other prophets. Pep-talk. There is some pep-talk in the Quran.

142 6/34b: "- - - there is none that can alter the Words (and Decrees) of Allah". At least when it comes to what is claimed sent down in the Quran, reality alters quite a lot of it. (But this is indicating the predestination - Allah decides and nobody can change his decisions, according to the Quran. Incompatible with the Bible.)

143 6/34c: "- - - already thou (Muhammad*) hast received - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

144 6/35a: “- - - yet if thou were able to seek a tunnel in the ground or a ladder to the skies and bring them (people – because also Muslims asked for proofs*) a Sign – (what good?)” Yes, the rhetoric question would be: What good would a real proof do? And the as rhetoric – but wrong because of twisted logic and even more twisted psychology – would be: Nothing, because the unbelievers would not believe anyhow. Who but deceivers need to twist logical and psychological facts? The real fact is that some proofs had given many new followers. Also see 6/7–9 above and 6/35b just below.

145 6/35b: "(If you Muhammad could*) bring them (unbelievers*) a Sign (a proof*) - (what good?)". Again Muhammad's explaining away the questions for proofs for his claims. One more case where Muhammad knew he was lying when indicating that proofs would mean nothing. Jesus worked for three - 3 - years only and attracted huge crowds, partly because he proved his connection to something supernatural. Muhammad worked for 12 - 13 years in Mecca and attracted only a number of dozens of followers - not until he started as a highway-man and his followers could get good money and later power, did he start to get many followers. He knew ever so well that a few miracles had made - yes, miracles.

146 6/35c: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

147 6/35d: "If it wert Allah's Will - - -". One of the many places in the Quran where Muhammad is telling what Allah could do, "if he only willed" - - - but he never will. Like tales from a child or immature person wanting to impress his surroundings. Boasting?

148 6/35e: "- - - true - - -". See 2/2b above.

149 6/35f: "- - - true guidance - - -". There is no true guidance in a book as full of mistakes, etc. as the Quran.

150 6/35g: "- - - those who are swayed by ignorance - - -". Who is the ignorant one? - the one who knows the Bible and sees that it tells things very different from what Muhammad claimed it told, and who in addition uses their brain for thinking things over? - or those who just blindly believe? After all in all other aspects of life to believe blindly what one is told, is the most sure way to be cheated.

151 6/35h: "- - - ignorance - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words which has to do with knowledge - or like here lack of knowledge - it normally refers to knowledge about Islam. Knowledge not related to the religion was less respected, or even thought to be negative.

152 6/36a: (YA857): “Those who listen (in truth), be sure, will accept - - -.” Here is a double meaning: “If people listen to the truth sincerely and earnestly, they must believe.” Or: “The sincere will believe”. Clear speech like so many times before.

153 6/36b: “Those who listen (in truth), be sure, will accept - - -.” Pep-talk - the ones who does not accept Muhammad, is because they do not really listen to him. That it for many was not true, did - and does - not matter very much for pep-talk, as long as his believers believed/believe it.

154 6/36c: "- - - (in truth) - - -". See 2/2b above.

155 6/36d: "- - - be sure - - -". See 2/2b above.

156 6/36e: "- - - as to the dead, Allah will raise them up - - -". If Allah exists. If he is behind what is told in the Quran. And if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth.

157 6/36f: "- - - as to the dead, Allah will raise them up - - -". This is an interesting claim you meet several places in the Quran - interesting because Allah never proved he could resurrect dead ones - often claimed, but never proved - whereas Yahweh proved it several times if the old books tell the truth (f.x. 1. Kings 17/22, 2. Kings 4/35-36, Mark 5/41, John 11/44, Luke 7/15, Matt. 27/52, Acts 9/40, Acts 20/10 - and the Quran 5/110a).

158 6/36g: "- - - then they (Muslims*) will be turned unto Him". As they hardly will be turned unto Yahweh if they live according to the partly immoral moral code of the Quran, this may be true. The big question in case are as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is from no god, will he be existing for them to turn to?

159 6/37a: “They (people*) say: ’Why is not a Sign sent down to him (Muhammad*) from his Lord (Allah*)?” People saw things might be - or was - seriously wrong. Many had questions and requests - but Muhammad was not able to deliver one single unmistakable proof. Only lots of fast-talk to explain it away, and the many, but logically invalid claimed "signs".

160 6/37b: “They (people*) say: ’Why is not a Sign sent down to him (Muhammad*) from his Lord (Allah*)?” One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

161 6/37c: “Allah hath certainly power to send down a Sign - - -”. But he never did - and Muhammad never was able to produce anything but fast words and less than convincing “explanations”. That is to say: Muslims are indoctrinated to believe it - and not to think for themselves, but only to obey and believe the imam. Because of this many of them honestly and without thinking things over, believe that invalid claims are proofs.

162 6/37d: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

163 6/37e: "- - - most of them (non-Muslims*) understand not". That was just what many of them did - understood that something was seriously wrong.

164 6/38a: “There is not an animal (that lives) on the earth, or a being that flies on its wings, but (forms part of) communities like you”. Wrong. There are many animals and birds, not to mention insects, that live alone and do not form communities- among insects and some carnivores and even birds it even may be dangerous to come close to one of your own species, especially if you are male.

165 6/38b: “There is not an animal (that lives) on the earth, or a being that flies on its wings, but (forms part of) communities like you”. his is not from the Bible. Beware that there is so much which is not from the Bible - even of things pretending to be from there - that we only mention some of it.

*166 6/38c: “Nothing have We (Allah*) omitted from the Book (the Quran*)”. Wrong. A lot is omitted even of essential things (that f.x. is why Islam has had to make many more laws than quoted in the Quran), and a lot of the facts - and may be other statements - are wrong. (There also is another possible meaning of the word "Book" here - the book in Heaven in which Allah is said to write down everything which happens. In this case this sentence is meant as a warning. But why does an omniscient god need to write down things?).

167 6/38d: "- - - they (all) shall be gathered to their Lord (Allah*) in the end". A bit strange sentence, as "they (all)" seems to refer to all animals and living beings. Normally the Quran only claim that humans are resurrected at the Day of Doom.

168 6/39a: "Those who rejects Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

169 6/39b: "Those who rejects Our (Allah's*) Signs are deaf and dumb - - -". The fact that there does not exist one single valid sign which proves Allah, may instead indicate that someone has tried a little cheating and then has been looked through by people with knowledge and/or intelligence - here the opposite of deaf and dumb. But we may remind you that to believe blindly often has the same effect as being deaf and dumb.

170 6/39c: “- - - Our (Allah'*) Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

171 6/39d: "- - - in the midst of darkness profound - - -". The question is who is in darkness: The ones who see that something is seriously wrong in the Quran, and thus with Muhammad and Islam, or they who believe blindly in a book so full of errors, contradictions, etc. that it is heresy to blame a god for it, and a book dictated by a man liking power, riches (at least for bribes) and women, and a man believing in lies and dishonesty as work tools (al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie, Kitman - the lawful half-truth, betrayal, and broken words/promises/oaths.

172 6/39e: "- - - whom Allah willeth, He leaveth to wander (end in Hell*) - - -". This refers to predestination. According to Hadiths (al-Bukhari) Allah decides 5 months before you are born whether you are to end in Paradise or in Hell. Compare this to "the lost coin" (Luke 15/8-10), "the lost sheep" (Matt. 18/12-14), "the lost son" (Luke 15/11-31), "the 11. hour" (Matt. 20/8-13), and weep. Yahweh and Allah the same god? Just guess!!

173 6/39f: "- - - a way that is straight". The road to the Quran's paradise - see 10/9f below.

174 6/40a: "(In*) - - - the Hour (that ye dread), would ye then call upon other than Allah?" When in danger or difficulties humans often call on a deity, this even some not strong believers. But they call on the god they believe in - which means that no-one but Muslims call on Allah.

Besides in a time of distress one would not call on a god who has never proved himself, so that most likely he does not exist. One would choose one who perhaps exists.

175 6/40b: "- - - truthful - - -". See 2/2b above. In connection with words like this, also beware of al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth), which both may be claimed to be the truth.

##176 6/41a: “Nay - On Him (Allah*) would ye (people*) call (if you were in distress*) - - -", Definitely not, as most likely he is a made up god - the Quran proves that the chances for that he exists are practically nil - and if he exists the question is if he is a god (not f.x. a dressed up Iblis/the Devil or something - the moral code, etc. in the Quran does not make such an explanation impossible).

##177 6/41b: “Nay - On Him (Allah*) would ye (people*) call (if you were in distress*), and if it be His (Allah’s*) will, He would remove (the distress) - - -”. But why call on Allah, when it is of no use? Allah according to the Quran follows his own predestined Plan which nobody and nothing can change - still according to the Quran. Thus if it is in his Plan that your distress will be removed, it will disappear no matter. Whereas if it is Allah's Plan that it shall go on, it will go on no matter what you say or do or plead. If the Quran tells the truth about Allah and his planning, there thus simply is no use praying to Allah - it will change nothing.

Or is this one more place in Islam where Muhammad wanted both good sides of incompatible good things which were impossible to combine - like predestination making battles and wars safe, but free will for man (impossible to combine even for a god) giving Allah reason for punishing sinners, included the ones not obeying Muhammad when he wanted a raid or a war? Here: Allah's unchangeable plans, vs. pray to Allah when you want a change in your future = a change in his plans (if it did not happen that it was his Plan to give you a better future, and in that case it was not the prayer which had any effect.

If Allah is following his unchangeable Plan like the Quran claims, there is no use praying to Allah - things will go according to his predestined Plan no matter ("if it be His will") - - - if the Quran tells the truth. Advising people to pray to Allah in case just is a bluff.

178 6/41c: “- - - if it be His (Allah’s*) will, He would remove (the distress) - - -”. He or nature or chance or yourself or a helper? There is no case in all the history where Allah undisputedly clear has helped anyone. Also see 6/41a just above.

179 6/41d: "- - - (the false gods) which ye (non-Muslims*) join with Him (Allah*)!" See 25/18a below.

180 6/42: "Before thee (Muhammad*) We (Allah*) sent (messengers)to many nations - - -". Muhammad claimed there had been sent messengers to all groups of humans through the history - and prehistory. The number 124ooo prophets through the millenniums are mentioned in Hadiths. The problem, however, is that no traces of all these claimed prophets or of the teaching of a monotheistic religion have ever been found, neither in history, nor in legends, nor in architecture (temples, etc), art, archeology, or anywhere - not even in fairy tales. The only exception is Israel, where a "narrow string" - often only one of any consequence at a time scattered through many centuries - kept the one god religion alive and mainly dominant. There is nothing else. Well, there are episodes like Akn Aton and his sun god in Egypt, but those few do not count here, especially as they clearly were pagan religions. Nothing. No traces. And when you compare to the results of a few dozen real prophets in Israel + the traces Muhammad - one single claimed prophet - and are told that 124ooo others did not leave a single trace, you simply do not believe there ever were all those prophets - you believe it all is fantasy simply. If not Islam proves anything, but they never do - only claims. And remember: "Claims without proofs can be dismissed without proofs" - and even more so if there are strong indicia or even proofs for that they are wrong. The number 124ooo is not true - like so much else within Islam. Most likely the correct number is nil - and this may include Muhammad's claim about being a prophet (he according to the Quran was unable to make prophesies - "see the unseen" - and a man unable to make prophesies is no prophet).

181 6/43a: "- - - why did they (non-Muslims*) not learn humility?" Is such a question worthy an omniscient god?

###182 6/43b: "- - - their hearts became hardened, and Satan made their (sinful) acts seem alluring to them". This is an interesting sentence, as it is clear that the Quran with all its mistakes is not from a god, but that one of the real possibilities is that it came from a devil dressed up like the angel Gabriel. A number of immoral and even horrible things seem alluring to Muslims, and one has to have a much hardened heart to be able to do some of the things Muslims have done through the times, and some still do.

183 6/45a: "Of the wrongdoers the last remnant was cut off (killed*). Praise be to Allah - - -". Yes, praise be to Allah for that all non-Muslims and sinners there (actually many places) were killed - lots of millions of non-Muslims have been killed or murdered by Muslims. Tales like this in a claimed holy book plus the preaching in accordance with such verses has its effect on the mentality of the followers. This verse is one of the reasons for the disregard Muslims have for non-Muslims ("half human value? - or less?" - from a recent debate in Pakistan), and the disregard for other peoples' property and well-being and lives: Rape a girl in Eritrea - it is "good and lawful" as we call this a Jihad, and her well-being does not interest neither us nor Islam. Kill an American - if he had been old enough, he had had to pay tax to America, and thus he is guilty of fighting Islam and merits to be killed (believe it or not, but this argument really is not only used, but widespread: "All Americans are guilty and can be killed, because they have to pay tax to USA" - - - Jihad = "self defense in the widest meaning of the word", so wide that it is a parody).

####184 6/45b: "Of the wrongdoers the last remnant was cut off (killed*). Praise be to Allah - - -". This "Praise be to Allah" is one of the points which makes Islam a morally sick and distasteful religion. A claimed benevolent and good god who is to be praised for repeated atrocities and mass murder, is distasteful outside our vocabulary, and as wrong morally. We are sorry - we have big vocabularies from lives in reading and learning, but we do not have strong enough words for this.

185 6/45c: “Praise be to Allah - - -". Please see 1/1a above - is he worthy of praise? (if he exists).

186 6/45d: “Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds”. Often claimed, never clearly proved - not in 1400 years.

187 6/45e: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds". Contradicted by the Bible which says it is Yahweh who is this.

188 6/45f: "- - - the Worlds - - -". There are no 7 worlds like this refers to (65/12).

189 6/46a: "- - - if Allah took away your hearing and your sight - - - (who but Allah could restore it)?" The strategic word here is "if" - there never was any reality in it. Just one more claim or bluff any priest in any religion could make free of charge - words are that cheap. Till now in all history there has not been one clear-cut case of Allah restoring any kind of health problem - Islam has not documented one single case, there only are wonderful words resting on no reality.

190 4/46b: "See how We (Allah*) explain the Signs - - -". There are in all the Quran no explanations of any of the claimed "signs" - only claims regarding them.

191 6/46c: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

192 6/46d: "- - - explain - - -". In the Quran this word often does not in reality mean explain, but "explain" or explain away. Also see 2/2b above.

193 6/47a: "Think ye (people*), if the punishment of Allah comes to you - - - will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?" The tsunami of 26. Dec. 2004 hit Muslims much harder than all other religions put together. The numbers are unsure, but some 250ooo vs. some 50ooo. Were all those 250ooo Muslims bad people?

194 6/47b: "Think ye (people*), if the punishment of Allah comes to you - - - will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?" Remember this in the cases in the Quran where Muhammad explains that the reason why Allah did not punish non-Muslims, was that he would not risk hurting Muslims at the same time (an "explanation" which in case shows that Allah is not omnipotent).

195 6/47c: "- - - those who do wrong - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

196 6/47d: "- - - those who do wrong - - -". One of Muhammad's many distaste inducing names for non-Muslims.

197 6/48a: "We (Allah*) send the Messengers only to give good news and to warn." In that case Muhammad was no messenger from Allah - he was too much of a thief/robber/enslaver and of a bloody robber baron/warlord/murderer and more. And later an enforcer: "Become Muslim or fight us and die"- that was the choice much of Arabia (and others) got. "- - - only to give good news - - -"? Not even wrong, but much stronger than wrong. (But this was in 621 AD before he started to become powerful and either became morally destroyed or could show his true moral and personality. Absolute power often works like that.

198 6/48b: "- - - nor shall they (good Muslims in the claimed next life*) grieve". That will entirely depend on what they in reality meet in the possible next life - remember that the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is not from any god.

199 6/49a: "- - - those who reject Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

200 6/49b: “- - - Our (Allah's) Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

201 6/49c: "- - - them (non-Muslims*) shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not to transgress". Some irony when you know that practically all armed strife was a result of armed aggression from Muhammad. "I hit you, because you hit me afterwards". "You are bad because you defended yourself against our thieving, enslaving and murder raids". Also see 3/77b above.

###202 6/50a: "- - - nor do I (Muhammad*) know what is hidden - - -". Muslims and Islam often tell about things Muhammad foresaw, and claims this and this prove Muhammad was connected to something supernatural - in spite of Muhammad's problems with explaining away his total lack of proofs and miracles, including foreseeing. Also in spite of Aishah's clear statements in Hadiths that the ones claiming Muhammad could foresee the future, were wrong. And here he himself states that he does not know what hidden.

This verse - 6/50 - also is a clear proof for that Muhammad was no prophet: A person unable to make prophesies - "know what is hidden" - by definition is no prophet. (F.x. 5. Mos. 18/21 - in the same speech of Moses where Islam claims Moses foresees Muhammad when talking about "a prophet like me" - quite an irony when 18/21 indirectly, but clearly tells Muhammad was not even a prophet. (And among many others 18/2 tells Moses were speaking about Jewish "brothers" - Islam has cherry-picked and twisted 18/15 and 18/18 in an al-Taqiyya.)).

### Surah 6 is a bit hard upon the wishful thinking of Muslims. In 6/50 Muhammad confirms he cannot see what is hidden - the future - killing all the claimed miracles claimed in Hadiths to be made by Muhammad concerning seeing what was hidden, and indirectly also documenting he was no prophet - not knowing the future = unable to make prophesies, and a person unable to make prophesies is no prophet. Also connected to 6/50;(A.6/39): "This denial on the part of the Prophet (Muhammad*) of any claim to supernatural power - - -". This states that Islam admits Muhammad had no supernatural power at all = absolutely no prophet. In connection to 6/108 "The Message of the Quran" (comment6/93) explains "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been implanted in him from childhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones" - which explains in details why Muslims believe in spite of all facts proving something is seriously wrong with the religion. In connection with 6/148 (comment 6/141 in the same book) Islam has to admit that the claim that Allah decides everything - predestination - is impossible to combine with the claimed free will for man (and without free will it is morally wrong to punish man for sins) - but "it all the same must be true, because Allah says so (in the Quran*)" the ultimate defeat for brain against blind belief. And in 6/151 may be the most well-known of the mistakes in the Quran accepted by Islam to be a mistake: "You are prohibited from - - - being good to your parents" (well, may be "Mary, sister of Aaron" is even more well-known, but that one is frequently tried explained away).

203 6/50b: "I (Muhammad tell you - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

204 6/50c: "I (Muhammad*) but follow what is resealed to me". Was it really resealed? - and in case by whom? As no god was ever involved in a book of a quality like the Quran, there remains dark forces, a mental illness (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - like modern medical science suspects), or a cold brain - f.x. Muhammad's.

205 6/50d: "- - - revealed - - -". See 4/47b and 15/59e above and 15/1b below.

206 6/50e: "Can the blind be held equal to the seeing?" - can a non-Muslim be held equal to a Muslim? Stupid question.

207 6/50f: "Can the blind be held equal to the seeing?" Can one blind from religion be as able to see facts as normal people? - or can he be as able to see through wishful thinking? - or through what he believes in just because he has been told so? Who is blind and who is not?

208 6/50g: (A. Comment 6/39 to verse 6/50): "This denial on the part of the Prophet (Muhammad*) of any claim to supernatural power - - -". That Islam accepts and states that Muhammad had no supernatural powers, is worth remembering when Muslims talk about all his miracles - f.x. from Hadiths (which the Quran by means of among others this verse proves are all made up). But far worse: It is here - and other places in the Quran - clear that Muhammad had no supernatural powers, and that in addition Allah made no miracles connected to him, and all the same Islam in its books and through its imams etc. tells and boasts about and uses for proof for Allah and for Muhammad's connection to Allah, to all its followers the shining miracles Muhammad is claimed to have performed - miracles they know the Quran proves are fairy tales! What does this tell about Islam as an institution, about the religion, and about the religious leaders in Islam?! Not to mention the question: Can a religion be a true one when its leaders have to use what they know are made up tales and lies? - and how much of the teaching and arguments then are lies?

Also: His admitted total lack of supernatural power strengthens the proof in 6/50a for that he was no real prophet.

209 6/51a: “- - - they will be brought to (Judgment (= Day of Doom*)) before their Lord (Allah*): except for Him they will have no protector nor intercessor - - -.” But:

20/109: “On that Day (Day of Doom*) shall no intercession avail, except for those whom permission has been granted by (Allah) - - -.” Here it is possible if Allah permits.

34/23: “No intercession can avail in His (Allah’s*) Presence (= on the Day of Doom*), except for whom He has granted permission.” Intercession ok if Allah permits.

43/86: “And those whom they invoke (“gods”, saints*) besides Allah have no power of intercession – only he (has*) who bears witness to the Truth - - -.” The word “he” hardly refers to Allah, because the Quran normally use capital 1. letter (“He”) then. But according to the Quran the prophets and messengers are to be called forth “to witness to the truth”. “He” therefore must likely be referring to each and every prophet and messenger (or at least to Muhammad - - - who according to the Quran has been given power to intercede).

Intercession is not impossible in spite of 6/51 – it only takes permission.

(3 contradictions)

210 6/51b: "- - - (against evil) - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

211 6/52a: "- - - those who call on their Lord (Allah*) - - -". Muslims.

212 6/52b: "- - - unjust - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

213 6/53: "Thus did We (Allah*) try some of them (Muslims*) - - -". Once more: Why does an omniscient god need to try anyone? - he knows everything already, and especially if he predestines everything, like the Quran claims many places. (But there is logic if it is Muhammad who needs to be able to explain hardship his followers meet.)

214 6/54a: "- - - those - - - who believe in Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". = Muslims.

215 6/54b: "- - - Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

216 6/54c: "- - - your Lord (Allah*) hath inscribed for Himself (the rule of) Mercy - - -". This surah is from 621 AD and Mecca - a time when Islam still was a quite peaceful religion, and perhaps these words were not too bad at that time. But the religion changed very much form 622 AD on and the flight to Medina - a fact Muslims never mention, and always tries to avoid explaining - to a brutal religion of war. This sentence was not true after ca. 624 AD. Besides: Why does Allah - or Muhammad - suddenly change the religion so brutally much, from relatively peaceful to a religion of war?

217 6/54d: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

218 6/54e: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

219 6/54f: "- - - He (Allah*) is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful". See 1/1a above.

220 6/55a: "Thus do We (Allah*) explain the Signs in detail - - -". How are his claimed signs explained here? They are explained nowhere in the entire Quran - there are lots of claims, but no valid explanations.

221 6/55b: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

222 6/56a: "- - - the Path - - -". = The road to Allah and his paradise - see 10/9f below.

223 6/56b: "- - - the company of those who receive guidance - - -". Muslims.

224 6/56c: "- - - those who receive guidance (Muslims*)." You do not receive much real guidance from a book full of errors and with a partly detestable moral and ethics" and even accepting dishonesty in many cases. (F.x. Al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie, Kitman - the lawful half-truth, and worse.)

225 6/57a: “- - - clear Sign - - -“. There are no clear signs for Allah or Muhammad in all the Quran. See 3/39b and 2/99 above.

226 6/57b: "What ye (non-Muslims*) would see hastened - - -". Some skeptics asked Muhammad to make his god punish them for sins, to prove for them that Allah really existed and had power. Muhammad was unable to produce also such proofs.

227 6/57c: "The Command rests with none but Allah - - -". The decision and predestination: Allah commands - decides - everything, and of course according to his predestined Plan.

228 6/57d: "The Command rests with none but Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims it rests with Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

*229 6/57e: “He (Allah) declares the Truth”. May be he does, but in that case outside the Quran, as what is referred in the Quran, is at best only partly the truth - too many mistaken facts, too many contradictions, too many mistakes in the Arab language according to literature, too many invalid “signs” and “proofs” - and may be some other mistakes, too - - - perhaps even religious mistakes (why should they be exceptions?) Plus a lot of unclear language. Actually: With so many mistakes that you find in the Quran, it at best is partly the truth.

230 6/57f: "- - - the Truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

231 6/57g: "- - - He (Allah*) is the best of judges". Not if he judges according to some parts of the morality code in the Quran, and some of the rules in sharia - a couple of those are the most horrible and unjust laws we have met in any judicial system.

 

 

232 6/58: "- - - those who do wrong - - -". Normally one of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

233 6/59a: "- - - the treasures that none knoweth but He (Allah*)" If he exists - and if not. f.x. Yahweh knows about it.

234 6/59b: "He (Allah*) knoweth whatever is on the earth and in the sea". See 2/233h above.

235 6/59c: “Not a leaf doth fall but with his knowledge - - -”. (A sign according to 6/97-99). Well, then he is very busy with what are not even trifles. But that aside: Any leaf fall sooner or later - that is according to nature. No god has ever proved he - or she - causes it.

236 6/59d: “Not a leaf doth fall but with his knowledge - - -”. If Allah has so detailed knowledge about everything, why then does he have to test his followers and others?! - this even more so if it is true like the Quran claims, that Allah decides and predestines everything!

237 6/59e: "- - - a Record - - -". A reference to Allah's Book of Records. But: Why does an omniscient god need a record?

238 6/59f: "- - - a Record clear - - -". But why does an omniscient good need a record?

239 6/60a: "It is He (Allah*) who doth take away your soul at night - - -" = makes you sleep - sleep is like a kind of death, as Allah takes away your soul. Muhammad often took natural phenomena and told they were because of Allah - like any believer in any religion can say about his god(s) as long as he can evade demands to prove it - there are few things so cheap as words.

240 6/60b: "- - - (Allah*) hath knowledge of all that ye have done by day - - -". See 2/233h above.

241 6/60c: "- - - that a term appointed be fulfilled - - -". = That Allah's predestination that you are to wake up again is fulfilled - Allah predestines EVERYTHING. (Incompatible with the Bible>).

242 6/60d: "- - - in the end (at the Day of Doom*) unto Him (Allah*) will be your return - - -". If Allah exists and is a god according to the tales of the Quran - - - and if the Quran's tales are true in every detail about this.

243 6/60e: "- - - in the end (at the Day of Doom*) unto Him (Allah*) will be your return - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which claims your return will be to Yahweh (for the Day of Doom). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

244 6/60f: "- - - then (at the Day of Doom*) He (Allah*) will show you the truth of all that ye (humans') did". If Allah knows and can tell everything about you, why then does he have to test you? There is no logic in this - not unless it in reality is Muhammad who needed an explanation for your problems and for why he wanted you to go to war. This even more so as the tests from this benevolent god is not tests in goodness, but in brutality and war, which made Muhammad more powerful and gave him and others power, riches and women.

245 6/60g: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

246 6/61a: "He (Allah*) is the Irresistible - - -". This and similar are often claimed, but never proved. It takes blind belief to believe in it - but then Muhammad glorified and Islam glorifies blind belief, as none of them could/can prove any of their central claims. In all other aspects of life, blind belief is the easiest way to be deceived, but in religion Muhammad glorified it and Islam glorifies it, in spite of that all claimed information comes only from a hardly reliable man believing in lies, etc. (f. ex. al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie - and Kitman - the lawful half-truth) and even in broken words/promises/oaths, but liking power and riches (at least for bribes), and women. Is there a connection?

247 6/61b: "He (Allah*) is - - - (watching) from above over His servants (Muslims*)- - -." Allah looks after you. But also remember: Allah sees what you do, so remember your discipline; be good and obedient! - and obedience on Earth in reality meant - and means - Muhammad and his successors."

248 6/61c: "- - - He (Allah*) sets guardians over you." Here is a contradiction. Guardians mean angels, and other places in the Quran makes it clear it is more than one who looks after you at the same time - and all the time. But f. ex. 6/8 says: "If We did send down an angel, the matter would be settled at once, and no respite would be granted them" = your life would come to an end or it would be the Day of Doom according to Islam. 6/61 says guardians (= angels, plural) take care of you. And for that case it is several places in the Quran said that the angel Gabriel is sent down to Muhammad. And Abraham, Lot, Mary, inhabitants in Sodom and Gomorrah saw angels. But 6/8 says no angel can be sent down because then everything will be over. A clear contradiction.

249 6/61d: "- - - when death approaches one of you, Our (Allah's*) angels (plural*) take his soul - - -". This is another contradiction, because another place in the Quran it is said Allah takes your soul, and yet another place that it is the Angel of Death (name - singular) who does it.

250 6/61e: "- - - Our angels take his soul - - -". But the Arab word used for Angel here, is "rusul" - the same word which the Quran uses for Muhammad in the meaning "messenger". If you instead inserts this meaning of the word in this claimed clear and distinct language, you get "- - - Our messenger (Muhammad*) take his soul - - -". Knowing something about the real Muhammad, this may provoke a few thoughts.

251 6/62a: "Then (the Day of Doom*) are men returned unto Allah - - -". If Allah exists and is a god according to the tales of the Quran - - - and if the Quran's tales are true in every detail about this.

252 6/62b: "Then (the Day of Doom*) are men returned unto Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible - there they are returned to Yahweh. And a problem here is that by all normal rules for evaluation, the Bible is likely generally to be more reliable than the Quran - and in addition there are all the Quran's errors, etc, which totally destroys its credibility. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

253 6/62c: "- - - Allah, their (Muslims'*) Protector - - -". Only if he exists, is a god, and is correctly described in the Quran.

254 6/62d: "- - - Allah - - - the (only) Reality - - -". Incompatible with the Bible, and: Is he a reality? There exists not ones single documentation - ONLY the word of a not very reliable man unable to prove one single of his words - a man with very doubtful morality, a man who clearly lied sometimes, a man who made lying, half truths (al-Taqiyya and Kitman) parts of his religion, a man who advocated breaking even your oaths if that gave a better result - and a man lusting for riches for bribes and for power - and for women - and not "specific" on how to lay his hands on any of those three.

255 6/62e: "- - - is not His (Allah's*) the Command?".Only if Allah exists and is a god according to the tales of the Quran - - - and if the Quran's tales are true in every detail about this.

256 6/62f: "And He (Allah*) is the Swiftest in taking account (included punishing*)". See 3/77b above.

257 6/63: "If He (Allah*) only deliver us from these (dangers) - - -". The strategic word here and many other places is "if". Besides: If Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims, and if nothing can change his predestinations and his Plan, why then pray for help? Either Allah has predestined that you will end in a mess, or he has predestined that you will not - prayers will not influence the predestination and the Plan, and thus is without any meaning or effect. The Quran very clearly states that nobody and nothing can change Allah's Plan.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

258 6/64a: "It is Allah that delivereth you from these and all (other) distresses - - -". A claim - but only a claim. Like normal the Quran never proves anything - is unable to prove anything. Is it strange that Muhammad idolized and preached blind belief for his followers? But not proved claims in reality are so weak that "any not proved claim can be dismissed without a proof" - another way of saying that the duty of proof rests on the one who claims something. It is not the duty of the opponent to disprove it.

259 6/64b: "It is Allah that delivereth you from these and all (other) distresses - - -". Of perhaps f.x. Yahweh delivered you from some of them?

260 6/64c: "- - - yet ye (non-Muslims*) worship false gods!" As far as Jews and Christians go, this is contradicted in the Bible - a book which on top of all neither mentions Allah nor Muhammad nor many of the most essential parts of Islam - like the duty to pray 5 times a day, the duty to go on pilgrimage to Mecca, the duty to wage war for the religion, etc. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

261 6/65a: More claims. See 6/64a above.

#262 6/65b: "See how We (Allah*) explains the Signs - - -", This somewhat cryptic claim you find several places in the Quran - cryptic because the claimed "signs" never are explained. Not once is it really explained how come that this and this really is a sign for Allah, neither anything about the claimed "signs" have any deeper meaning. It only is claimed that this and this and this are "signs" - intended to mean proofs (the word "proof" is even used a few times) - for Allah, and that is all - - - and the claims all have that in common that they are logically invalid, mostly just because it is not proved that Allah really is behind it (there may be a few exceptions for things "borrowed" from the Bible, but they in case prove Yahweh, not Allah).

263 6/65c: "- - - Signs - - -". There exist no signs proving Allah, neither in nor outside the Quran. In each and every case it for one thing never is proved that the effect or thing even is made by a god, and in each and every case any believer in any religion can claim exactly the same for his god(s). Utterly invalid indications or proofs - and who uses invalid proofs and fast talk? - the cheater and deceiver.

264 6/65d: "- - - that they (Muslims/people*) may understand". But if you accept wrong facts which the Quran is full of, what do you then understand?/p>

265 6/66a: "But thy (Muhammad's*) people reject this (Muhammad's preaching and his claimed signs*), though it is the Truth". The reason was that many of them saw it was not the truth, or at least that something was very wrong. Especially for the ones knowing the Bible, this was very easy to see, as much of what Muhammad claimed was from the Bible, was not from that book, but from religious legends, apocryphal (made up) books, folklore and even fairy tales.

266 6/66b: "- - - it (the signs*) is the Truth." The Quran claims they are true, but for one thing no documentation for that Allah is even involved is ever available, even though it should be easy for an omnipotent god, for another any priest in any religion can say just the same on behalf of his god(s), and not least: The Quran is so full of mistakes and of invalid claims, that it is difficult to believe anything without external proofs in addition.

267 6/66c: "- - - the Truth." See 2/2b above.

268 6/66d: “Not mine (Muhammad’s*) is the responsibility for arranging your (religious*) affairs.” This was in 621 AD – Muhammad got other ideas after 622 AD. This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 29 contradictions).

269 6/67: "For every Message is a limit of time". Islam explains that the reason why new messages had to be sent now and then, was that the times changed and new messages were needed to cover the changes. But neither the Quran nor Islam ever explained:

The Quran claims it is a copy of the revered and timeless ”mother book" in Heaven - a book which is from the beginning of time or perhaps from eternity. How was it possible to change the "mother book" to make copies adjusted for new times? - new editions of the scriptures/Qurans sent down.

Times have changed more since 1789 (French revolution) - yes only the last century - than it did during all the many millenniums from the dawn of Homo Sapiens till Muhammad. How come no new teaching - yes, not even a single small prophet is needed now? - the world really could need something!

The teaching of the Bible - which the Quran claims is from the same god as the Quran - changed from partly strict in OT to a lot milder with Jesus - may be the god saw that during the long (172 years and plus) Pax Romanum in a wide area a more mild and beneficial version of his teaching finally had a chance to take hold and grow strong enough to meet the ups and downs of the future. How come that his next claimed change - Islam - then was not back to the old and partly harsh teaching, but back to something much worse; a pure war religion built to a large degree on haughtiness and disregard for others, blood, war, suppression and lies? - and contradicting the most fundamental parts of his moral code in the Bible?

270 6/68a: "When thou (this might mean Muhammad, but Muhammad hardly would forget - see further down in the same verse - so it must mean Muslims*) seest men engaged in vain discourse about Our (Allah's*) Signs, turn away from them - - -". Do not engage in a debate which can give you information Muhammad did not want you to have?

271 6/68b: "- - - Our (Allah's) Signs - - -". See f.x. 2/39b and 6/65b above.

272 6/68c: “- - - sit not thou (Muslim*) in the company of those who do wrong (non-Muslims*)” A very clear order. And a warning of possible social reactions from fellow Muslims. And may be Muhammad also did not want rational questions or facts from the outside - leaders of sects (at this time - 621 AD - Islam just was a fringe sect) often do not like true information that does not fit his teaching, or rational questions.

273 6/68d: "- - - those who do wrong". One of Muhammad's many not flattering names for non-Muslims. All these negative names had and has an effect.

274 6/68e: "- - - do wrong". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

275 6/69a: "On their (non-Muslims*) account no responsibility falls on the righteous, but (their duty) is to remind them (everybody*), that they may (learn to) fear Allah". A complicated way to say this: "It is the duty of all good Muslims to work for spreading Islam – procelyting". Something to remember and beware of - especially as using also al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth) both are recommended if they will give a better effect at defending or forwarding – procelyting - Islam.

276 6/69b: "- - - the righteous - - -". The Muslims - no-one else normally is righteous in the Quran.

277 6/69c: "- - - righteous - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

278 6/70a: “Leave alone those who take their religion to be mere play and amusement - - -.” Muhammad got more power – and other ideas – later. Then he changed his mind. This verse is contradicted and often “killed” - abrogated - by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 29 contradictions).

279 6/70b: (A6/58 – in 2008 edition A6/60): “Leave alone those who take their religion to be mere play and amusement - - -.” But the Arab words “attakhadu dinahum la’iban wa-lahwan” also can mean the exact opposite: “They have made play and fun their religion”. Which meaning is the correct one? – nobody knows, not even a top ayatollah. Clear speech that is impossible to misunderstand in the Quran? And these variants as usual also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word there has more than one meaning.

280 6/70c: "- - - (truth) - - -". See 2/2b above.

##281 6/70d: "- - - every soul delivers itself to ruin (Hell*) by their own acts - - -". Here we are back to one of Islam's impossible contradictions: Muhammad needed the predestination, because it gave many and unafraid warriors - they were not to die until Allah had when decided, so war was not dangerous. But if Allah predestined everything there was no moral reason for him to punish humans for sins he had predestined they should do - thus man had to have free will. Muhammad was and Islam is unable to explain the very serious contradiction: Allah decides and predestines everything, but man had free will and decides for himself. Islam only has the weak claim "it is impossible for man to understand, but has to be true as Allah says so in the Quran" - see 6/149a below. Some Muslims tries to explain that what is meant, is that man has partly free will, but that is a nonsense explanation. For one thing no human had fully free will - he always was partly dependant on nature and on others, and never had any more than partly free will at best, so then it is not a way out of the problem to claim he only had partly free will. And for another: When it is made totally clear that Allah decides and predestine absolutely every detail on Earth, there is no kind of free will left for man, not even a partly one. And not forget that for a third: The laws of chaos would make even partly free will, spoil Allah’s predestination and unchangeable Plan,

282 6/70e: "- - - there is no protector or intercessor except Allah - - -". Contradictions:

The Quran tells that some ones can be intercessors if Allah permits it.

It also is made clear that Muhammad has got the right to be intercessor even on the Last Day.

And then there is the question about f.x. Yahweh.

283 6/70f: "- - - those who deliver themselves to ruin by their own acts - - -". How is that possible if Allah has predestined absolutely everything like the Quran claims other places?

284 6/70g: "- - - have for drink (only) boiling water - - -". But the Arab word "hamim" which here is translated to "boiling" has more meanings, f.x. "painfully cold" - exactly the opposite. (A6/60 - in the 2008 edition in English 6/62). A clear language in the Quran?

285 6/70h: "- - - punishment, one most grievous - - -". See 3/77b above.

286 6/70i: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) persisted in rejecting Allah". Not strange as they saw things in Muhammad's teaching were much wrong - his sources often said other things than he claimed they said, and this especially goes for the Bible. The reason here is likely to be that Muhammad knew legends, etc. about and or based on the Bible, but not the Bible itself - at least only very superficially.

287 6/71a: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

288 6/71b: "Shall we indeed call on others besides Allah - - -". If Allah is a made up god, one might instead try to call on others instead of Allah. Based on a book full of mistakes, there is not much of a chance that the god Allah exists, this even more so as he never has proved or manifested himself. Never (guess if Islam had screamed about it if our information here had been wrong!)

289 6/71c: "- - - things (other gods*) that can do us neither good nor harm - - -." It is clear that made up gods have no effect. What also is clear, is that Allah has never done anything which is documented, not one thing - there are lots of claims for him being a god, but not one single documentation. But "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been imprinted in him from childhood, and which he shares with his social environments, as the only true and possible ones - - -", to quote Islam (M.A. comment 6/93 to verse 6/108). So Muslims believe uncritically he is a god.

If Yahweh according to the Bible and to the Quran could let Jesus make proofs for connection to something supernatural, and if Allah = Yahweh like the Quran claims, it just is fast-talk outside any logic that Allah could not send proofs to Muhammad if Muhammad was his representative. This even more so as people believed in Jesus to a large part because his miracles - and Pharaoh's sorcerers came to believe because of a miracle Moses did - whereas Muhammad's excuse is that no-one would believe even if he made miracles. (To be very polite: Muhammad knew he was lying each time he used this excuse - he was too intelligent not to see this.) And: There has been proved not one single act of good or bad from Allah himself since he was launched by Muhammad 1400 years ago! He has himself never done an documented good or harm - the teaching about him, yes, he himself never (Muslims had told about it with letters made by fire and more if there had been even one single case). Allah personally has been able to "do neither good nor harm".

290 6/71d: "- - - receiving guidance from Allah - - -". Not one proved case of guidance from Allah is registered any place any time. Not one.

291 6/71e: "- - - guidance from Allah - - -" = the teachings of Muhammad. But a teaching based on a book with so much wrong, is no real guidance.

292 6/71f: "- - - the Path - - -". The claimed road to the Quran's Paradise.

293 6/71g: "Allah's guidance is the (only) guidance - - -". But if Allah's guidance = the teachings of the Quran, there are too many mistakes, etc. to be any reliable guidance.

294 6/71h: "Allah's guidance is the (only) guidance - - -". Strongly contradicted by the Bible, which claims that the only reliable guidance is from Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

295 6/71i: "- - - the Lord of the Worlds - - -". The Quran claims this is Allah. The Bible says it is Yahweh - and all real scientists say that the Bible is a more reliable source that the Quran (no real scientist use the Quran as a source for anything older than 610 AD, whereas the Bible sometimes is used - with care - by scientists and often has proved to be correct - there even exists a some 40 (?) years old book about practical use of information from the Bible in modern Israel + checking of some of its other controllable information. The name if we remember correctly is "But the Bible was right".

296 6/71j: “- - - worlds - - -“. Referring to the 7 worlds that exist according to the Quran. Wrong. See 65/12.

297 6/72a: "To establish regular prayers - - -". This with 5 - or another number - of prayers a day at regular times is something you do not find in the Bible neither in OT nor in NT. There you pray when you feel for it or when there is an extra reason. This fact that for Allah the fixed prayers are so essential that it is one of the five official "pillars" of the religion of Allah, whereas Yahweh is totally uninterested in such formalism, is one of the many 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god. It simply is incompatible with the Bible.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

297a 6/72b: "To establish regular prayers - - -".What is the idea of prayers in Islam? If Allah predestines everything long before, like the Quran frequently states, prayers can have no effect at all, as nobody and nothing can change Allah's unchangeable Plan.

298 6/72c: "- - - for it is to Him (Allah*) that we shall be gathered together". If Allah exists. If he is behind the tales of the Quran. And if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth.

299 6/72d: "- - - for it is to Him (Allah*) that we shall be gathered together". Contradicted by the Bible, which states that it is to Yahweh you shall return for the Day of Doom. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

300 6/73a: "It is He (Allah*) Who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved. This just is one of the many claims in the Quran any believer can make free of charge on behalf of any god, as long as no proof has to be produced.

301 6/73b: "It is He (Allah*) Who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible which claims this was done by Yahweh - and as it in reality may have been created by nature, both may be wrong.

302 6/73c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

303 6/73d: "- - - He (Allah*) saith, 'Be', behold, it is." The Quran other places claims Jesus could not be the son of the god, because the god had no woman (wrong: In the very old Hebrew religion there was a female - Yahweh's Amat - but over centuries and millenniums she was forgotten in that very masculine society. Source: New Scientist and others, and thus the god might have got a son in the "normal" way in spite of the Quran's words about this a couple of places). But may be the god said: "Be a son", and behold, Jesus was. And who are we who say that a god does not like a son?

304 6/73e: “His (Allah’s*) Word (the Quran*) is the Truth”. With that many mistakes, it at best is partly true.

305 6/73f: "His (Allah's*) Word is the Truth". See 2/2b above.

306 6/73g: "- - - (the Quran is*) the Truth - - -". See 13/1g and 40/75 below.

307 6/73h: "His (Allah's*) will be the dominion - - -". Often claimed, never proved. This just is one of the many claims in the Quran any believer can make free of charge on behalf of any god, as long as no proof has to be produced.

308 6/73i: "His (Allah's*) will be the dominion - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it will be Yahweh's. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

309 6/73j: "- - - the day the trumpet will be blown". = The Day of Doom.

310 6/73k: "He (Allah*) knoweth the Unseen as well as that which is open". = Allah knows everything. See 2/233h above.

311 6/73l: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Wise - - -". Not if the Quran represents his wisdom - too much is wrong there.

312 6/73m: "- - - He (Allah*) is - - - well acquainted (with all things)". Stay in line and be good and obedient - Allah sees you. Among other things a small reminder.

313 6/73n: "- - - He (Allah*) is - - - well acquainted (with all things)". See 2/233h above.

314 6/74a: "- - - Abraham - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

315 6/74b: "Lo, said Abraham to his father Azar". Also Azar is a historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

316 6/74c: "Lo, said Abraham to his father Azar". Contradiction to the Bible: There his father's name is Terah. (But to be fair one must mention that Talmud - Jewish scriptures - sometimes calls him Zarah, and that also the name Athar has been used in a history book from around 300 AD (Eusebius Pamphili)).

317 6/74d: "Lo, said Abraham to his father Azar: 'Takest thou Idols for gods? For I see thee and thy people in manifest error". This is not from the Bible. In the Bible there is not even a hint about that Terah/Azar or his people had other gods than Yahweh. There also is not one hint about a disagreement between Abram (his original name according to the Bible - the name Abraham he got from Yahweh much later (not mentioned in the Quran - Muhammad hardly knew this)) and his father or between Abram and his people. Also there is no hint about religious disagreement and there further is no other reason to believe that another god than Yahweh was involved - though this early they may have used f.x. the name El for him. From where did Muhammad get this story? No god was involved in a book with so much wrong like the Quran, and but for a god there is no other source about Abram/Abraham than the Bible. Oh, well, there are the dark forces, there are the legends and fairy tales, and there is the fantasy (though Muhammad seems not to have had a very creative fantasy - he normally "borrowed" stories from where he found them and just twisted them so as to make them fit his new religion).

318 6/74e: "Lo, said Abraham to his father Azar: 'Takest thou Idols for gods? For I see thee and thy people in manifest error". A time anomaly. See 4/13d above.

319 6/74f: "Lo, said Abraham to his father Azar: 'Takest thou Idols for gods? For I see thee and thy people in manifest error". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

320 6/74g: "- - - manifest - - -". See 2/2b above.

321 6/74-83: These stories about Abram/Abraham are not from the Bible. There also is no mentioning about religious disagreement between Abram/Abraham and his father in the Bible.

322 6/75a: "So also did We (the god*) show Abraham the power and the laws of the heavens and the earth - - -". This is not from the Bible.

323 6/75b: "- - - Abraham - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

324 6/75c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

325 6/76a: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (a star*) is my Lord'". Not from the Bible.

326 6/76b: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (a star*) is my Lord'". See 6/74d above.

327 6/76c: "- - - he (Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

328 6/77a: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (the moon*) is my Lord'". Not from the Bible.

329 6/77b: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (the moon*) is my Lord'". See 6/74d above.

330 6/77c: "- - - he (Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

331 6/77d: "Unless my (Abram/Abraham*) Lord (Allah according to the Quran*) guide me - - -". As for guide, see 16/107 below.

332 6/77e: "Unless my (Abram/Abraham*) Lord (Allah according to the Quran*) guide me, I (Abram/Abraham*) shall surely be among those who go astray". Not from the Bible.

333 6/78a: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (the sun*) is my Lord'". Not from the Bible.

334 6/78b: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'This (the sun*) is my Lord'". See 6/74d above.

335 6/78c: "- - - he (Abram/Abraham*) said: 'O My People! - - -". See 6/74d above.

336 6/78d: "- - - he (Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

337 6/78e: "- - - your (Abram's/Abraham's people*) (guilt) of giving partners to Allah". This is not from the Bible. There is no indication for a religious conflict between him and his people. Han between him and his father there is no indication of any serious conflict of any kind. According to the Bible (1. Mos.11/31) Abram/Abraham travelled together with his father from Ur in Chaldea in what is now south Iraq to Haran in what is now north Iraq and settled there. Later left his father in Haran (1. Mos. 12/1), not because of a disagreement with his father, but because Yahweh called him to go to his promised land, Canaan - now roughly Israel.

338 6/78f: "- - - giving partners to Allah". See 25/18a below.

339 6/79a: "(Abram/Abraham said:*) 'For me, I have set my face, - - - (etc.')". See 6/74d above.

340 6/79b: "- - - Him (here claimed to be Allah*) who created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved. And a claim anyone can make on behalf of any god, as long as demands for proofs can be pooh-poohed. But remember: "Any claim which is without a proof, can be dismissed without a proof".

341 6/79c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

342 6/79d: "- - - partners to Allah". See 25/18b below.

343 6/80a: "His (Abram's/Abraham's*) people disputed with him." This is not from the Bible. There is no indication of a dispute, not to mention a religious dispute, here in the Bible (1. Mos. 11/26 - 12/4).

344 6/80b: (YA 901): "His (Abraham's*) people disputed with him - - -". Quote from the comment: "If spiritual enlightenment goes so far as to take a man (even today Islam says ""a man", not "a person" - women counts little*) beyond his ancestral worship, people will come and worship with him".

1. "Spiritual enlightenment" may take a person "beyond his ancestral worship". This may happen to Muslims, too, especially as they only believe in what their ancestors worshiped, told to their ancestors again by a man with very dubious morality, a man accepting lies, a man unable to prove even an atom of his claims - and a man who liked power.

2. The trouble with Islam is that Muhammad did not trust his religion enough to rely on words to convince people. If someone got enough "spiritual enlightened" to want to leave Islam, one should use all kinds of pressure and baits and even murder to make leaving difficult or impossible. (Muhammad himself often used both baits - money - and pressure, and Muhammad is the shining idol in Islam; "do like him").

345 6/80c: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said: (Come) ye (his people*) to dispute with me, about Allah, when He (himself) hath guided me?" Contradicted by the Bible which says his god was Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

346 6/80d: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said: (Come) ye (his people*) to dispute with me, about Allah, when He (himself) hath guided me?" Even omitting the fact that the Bible never mentions Allah (or Muhammad*), this is not from the Bible.

347 6/80e: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said: (Come) ye (his people*) to dispute with me, about Allah, when He (himself) hath guided me?" See 6/74d above.

348 6/80f: "He (Abram/Abraham*) said - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

349 6/80g: "- - - guided - - -". Muhammad claimed Abraham was guided by something like the tales of the Quran, but see 16/107 below.

350 6/80h: "- - - (the beings (gods*)) ye (the people*) associate with Allah - - -". See 25/18a below.

351 6/80i: "- - - unless my Lord (here indicated to be Allah*) willeth, (nothing can happen) - - -". See 14/19d below.

352 6/80j: "- - - unless my Lord (here indicated to be Allah*) willeth, (nothing can happen) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible to say the least of it - Yahweh is said to be powerful. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

353 6/80k: "- - - my (Abram's/Abraham's*) Lord (here claimed to be Allah*) comprehendeth in his knowledge all things". Not if the Quran is a sample of his knowledge and comprehension.

354 6/81a: "(Abram/Abraham said:*) 'How should I - - - (etc.*)". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

355 6/81b: "- - - I (Abram/Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

356 6/81c: "- - - partners to Allah - - -". See 25/18a below.

357 6/81d: "Which of (us) two parties (Arab/Muslims vs. non-Muslims*) hath more right - - -". That is more of a question than most Muslims like to believe.

358 6/82a: "(Abram/Abraham said:*) It is those who believe (in the Quran*) - - - that are (truly) in security - - -". See 6/81a above.

359 6/82b: "It is those who believe (in the Quran*) - - - that are (truly) in security - - -". Are they? Relying on a book full of mistakes, dictated by a man relying at least partly on untruth and dishonesty, and a man wanting riches for bribes, wanting power, and wanting women - - - and not being too mindful about how he got hold on any of those three. If Allah does not exist or if he exists but is not correctly described in the Quran, the one thing they may be secure about is that they have no security. Yes worse: If Allah is made up, at least the ones of them living according to the harsher parts of the Quran can be pretty sure not to end in a paradise - yes, this may be the case for all Muslims, if they believe in a non-existing god. (And at least the Quran with all its mistakes, etc. is from no god.)

360 6/82c: "- - - those who confuse not their beliefs with wrong - - -". With so much wrong in the Quran, it is a very open question who confuse belief with wrong.<

361 6/82d: "- - - (truly) - - -". See 2/2b above.

362 6/82e: "- - - wrong - - -": Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

363 6/82f: "- - - (right) guidance (the Quran*) - - -". Too much is wrong in the Quran to give right guidance.

364 6/82g: "- - - (right) - - -". See 2/2b above,

365 6/82h: "- - - guidance - - -". See 2/2b above.

366 6/83a: "- - - Abraham - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

367 6/83b: "We (Allah*) rise whom We will - - -". The standard explanation for why some had a better life than others - even being non-Muslims: Allah in his unfathomable wisdom decides. But it also is an argument in the debate: Why an Arab prophet in a line where all documented prophets were Jews? (Hud etc. were not documented).

268 6/83c: "- - - thy Lord (Allah*) is full of wisdom and knowledge". Not if he made the Quran.

369 6/83d: "- - - Knowledge". Remember that when the Quran uses words like this, it normally means knowledge about the Quran, Islam and related topics.

370 6/84a: "- - - him (Abram/Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

371 6/84b: "- - - Isaac and Jacob - - -". 2 historical anomalies - see 4/13d above.

372 6/84c: "- - - We (Allah*) guided - - -". Allah or Yahweh? Muhammad claimed - as normal without any proof - that Allah just is another name for Yahweh (a claim proved wrong by the fact that the teachings fundamentally are too different). This is so often claimed in the Quran, that we comment on it just now and then.

373 6/84d: "- - - Noah - - - David, Solomon, Job, Joseph, Moses, and Aaron - - -". 7 historical anomalies. See 4/13d above.

374 6/85a: "And Zakariyya and John, and Jesus and Elias - - -". 4 historical anomalies. See 4/13d above.

375 6/85b: "- - - in the rank of the Righteous - - -". In just this case this may be true. But normally when the Quran uses such expressions, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

376 6/85c: "And Ishmael and Elisha, and Jonah, and Lut - - -". 4 historical anomalies. See 4/13d above.

377 6/87a: "- - - We (Allah*) guided (by means of Quran-like books*) - - -". But no twin of the Quran can give much guidance.

378 6/87b: "- - - a straight Way". The claimed road to Allah and to his paradise - see 10/9f below.

379 6/88a: "This (the Quran*) is the Guidance of Allah - - -". No god would send down a book with so much wrong like the Quran as guidance to his followers.

380 6/88b: "- - - guidance - - -". See 2/2b above.

381 6/88c: "- - - He (Allah*) giveth guidance to whom He pleaseth, of His worshippers". Allah guides whom he pleases - Yahweh anyone who honestly asks for it according to the Bible. No comments.

382 6/88d: "- - - join other gods with Him (Allah*) - - -". See 25/18a below.<(p>

383 6/89a: "These were the men (the ones mentioned in verses 6/83 through 6/87*) to whom We (Allah*) gave - - -". Contradicted by the Bible which says that it was Yahweh who gave them what they got. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

384 6/89b: "These were the men (the ones mentioned in verses 6/83 through 6/87*) to whom We (Allah*) gave the Book". At least Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Ishmael had no book, let alone something like OT or the Quran which is meant here.

385 6/89: "These were the men (the ones mentioned in verses 6/83 through 6/87*) to whom We (Allah*) gave - - - Prophethood - - -". Not all of this is from the Bible. Of the names mentioned only Jesus, Elias (Elijah), Elisha, and Moses are reckoned to be prophets, though Abraham, Joseph, and perhaps Jonah can be reckoned among them. As for Moses it is correct to reckon him among the prophets, but he was a special case. The same goes even more for Jesus. The others are not reckoned among the prophets in the Bible.

386 6/90a: "Those were the (prophets) who received Allah's guidance - - -". There is documented only one (self proclaimed) prophet who has (claimed he has) got anything from Allah. And he only (claimed he) got the Quran. Muhammad. The others got it from Yahweh according to the Bible - a piece of information never proved wrong by the Quran - claims yes, proofs no.

387 6/90b: "- - - the guidance they received (the Quran*) - - -". See 6/88a above.

388 6/90c: "- - - guidance - - -". See 2/2b above.

389 6/90d: "No reward do I ask of you - - -". This was one of Muhammad’s claims, and then it was good to have the earlier prophets say the same - indicating this was what real prophets said. And Muhammad took nothing? No, only 1/5 of everything stolen or robbed, included slaves - 100% if the victims gave in without fighting - (for comparison: Yahweh once in the Bible (4. Mos. 31/28) demanded 1/500 - Allah via his representative (?) Muhammad demanded 1/5 = 100 times as much! The same god?), tax = 2.5% on average of everything you own (not earn, but own) each and every year (if you are not too poor) and 10% of everything dug out of the earth + plenty of women + total obedience and total power over you. No, Muhammad demanded "nothing" from his followers!(Reality incompatible with at least NT).

390 6/90e: "- - - this (the Quran*) is no less than a Message for the nations." There have been many messages to the nations through the times - some may have been true and some definitely not. And the Quran at least is from no god - too many facts, etc. are wrong. Is also this a wrong claim?

391 6/91a: Claim: Allah (sent it (the books of Moses*) down). Contradicted by the Bible: Yahweh sent it to Moses (the 2 stone tablets with the 10 Commandments. In addition he told Moses the Law, which Moses later wrote down - a scripture sometimes called "the Book of Covenance" (2. Mos. 24/7)). And we repeat two things: Science and even more so Islam have proved the Bible is not falsified. Plus see 6/91b just below. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs./p>

392 6/91b: “Allah (sent it (the books of Moses*) down)”. Moses only got the 2 stone tablets with the 10 Commandments + he was told the law (later parts of the 5 "Books of Moses") which he himself later wrote down, this according to the Bible. The books thus were not sent down by anyone. They were written several hundred years later, according to science. But see 6/91a just above.

##393 6/91c: "Who then sent down the Book which Moses brought?" This is intended as a rhetoric question with only one possible answer: Allah.

One thing is that the Bible tells he got what he got not from Allah (neither Allah nor Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible). More essential just here is that Moses did not get any book(s) - both according to the Bible which says he got 2 stone tablets + vocal information, and according to science which tells that the Books of Moses were written long time after his death. This simply is a try to make up a "proof" for that Allah might have sent down the Quran, but as the god did not send down the Bible, this claim is a total miss. Any god had known this and not made such a flop. Then who made the Quran?

Actually surah 6 is a bit hard upon the wishful thinking of Muslims:

In 6/50 Muhammad confirms he cannot see what is hidden - the future - killing all the claimed miracles claimed made by Muhammad concerning seeing what was hidden, and indirectly also documenting he was no prophet - not knowing the future = unable to make prophesies, and a person unable to make prophesies is no prophet. (F. ex. 5. Mos. 18/21 - in the same speech of Moses where Islam claims Moses foresees Muhammad when talking about "a prophet like me" - quite an irony when 18/21 indirectly, but clearly tells Muhammad was not even a prophet - he only "borrowed that impressive and imposing title" to quote an unknown wise man. (And among many others 18/2 tells Moses was speaking about Jewish "brothers" - Islam has cherry-picked and twisted 18/15 and 18/18 in an al-Taqiyya.)

Also connected to 6/50;(A6/39): "This denial on the part of the Prophet (Muhammad*) of any claim to supernatural power - - -". This states that Islam admits Muhammad had no supernatural power at all = absolutely no prophet.

In connection with 6/108 "The Message of the Quran" (comment 6/93) explains "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been implanted in him from childhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones" - which explains in details why Muslims believe in spite of all facts proving something is seriously wrong with the religion.

In connection with 6/148 (comment 6/141 in the same book) Islam has to admit that the claim that Allah decides everything - predestination - is impossible to combine with the claimed free will for man (and without free will it is morally wrong to punish man for sins) - but "it all the same must be true, because Allah says so (in the Quran*)" the ultimate defeat for brain against blind belief.

And in 6/151 may be the most well-known of the mistakes in the Quran accepted by Islam to be a mistake: "You are prohibited from - - - being good to your parents" (well, may be "Mary, sister of Aaron" is even more well-known, but that one is frequently tried explained away).

*394 6/91d: "- - - Moses - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

395 6/91e: “- - - ye (Jews*) conceal much (of its (the Torah’s = first part of the OT*) contents - - -)“. The old and never proved claim from Muhammad that the Bible is falsified - his only possible defense against the fact that the Bible says a lot of things differently from what he claimed it said. Science has ever so clearly - and Islam even more clearly - shown that this Islamic claim is wrong: Many really old documents (the numbers vary some, but some 300 copies or fragments of the Gospels, some 12ooo of other parts of the bible + some 32ooo other manuscripts with quotations from the Bible) have shown that the texts of today are like the really old ones. Not even Islam has found a proved falsification!! Islam will have to bring real proofs for this repeated claims in the Quran and elsewhere – till now they only have produced claims; unfunded claims and loose words, and we are back to the old fact: If Islam had found one single hard fact showing that the Bible in any way was falsified, the world had been told quickly and with large letters. This because Islam does not have one single real proof for the existence of Allah, for Gabriel as a messenger to Muhammad, for Muhammad’s connection to a god or anything at all – everything rests only – only – on what Muhammad told, and the historical Muhammad (in contradiction to the Islamic glossy picture) was a man that would not have been accepted in any serious court as a reliable witness. A proof for falsification of the Bible would be an indication for that the Quran was correct at least on this one point, and thus very welcome. But in 1400 hundred years no real proof has been found – only claims and words. Therefore a real proof for a falsified Bible had been big news in all Muslim media and for all Muslims debating religion forever after. No such proof has ever been produced by Islam or anyone else.

Also see 3/24, 5/13, 5/14, 5/15. Similar claims in 2/42 – 5/14 – 5/15. And the chapter about differences between the Bible and the Quran, which will be added in 2011 or 2012 AD.

396 6/91f: "Allah (sent it (the Quran*) down) - - -". See 6/91a above.

397 6/91g: "- - - then leave them (non-believers*) to plunge in vain discourse and trifling." But to leave them was what they had to do before they became strong enough to react strictly. This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 28 abrogations).

398 6/91h: "- - - vain discourse and trifling - - -". See 2/2b above.

399 6/91i: "- - - vain discourse and trifling - - -". Pep-talk - there is no reason to listen to what they tell. A wise "advice" from any leader who does not want his followers to get correcting facts.

400 6/92a: "And this is a Book (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) have sent down". No omniscient god has sent down a book with so much wrong contents like the Quran.

401 6/92b: "- - - (the Quran is*) bringing blessings - - -". Can a book not from any god bring blessings in the religious meaning of that word? No.

*402 6/92c: "(The Quran is*) “confirming (the revelations) which came before it (the Bible*)”. Wrong. There are so many fundamental differences, that the Quran is no confirmation of the Bible. See f. ex. 2/89 and 3/3 for further explanation. Similar claims in 26/196 - 35/31 – 46/12 – 46/30. See also separate chapter about the Bible in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran".

403 6/92d: "- - - the Mother of Cities - - -". = Mecca (beware that the name also is written Makkah - and a few times also Bakkah). Strange name for an after all young city and not too big.

404 6/92e: "- - - and all (people*) around her (around Mecca)". Muslims like to claim this means all humanity. And why not be grandiose when the Quran like so often is unclear enough to give an opening for wishful thinking - here by using not normal meaning of words?

*405 6/92f: “Those who believe in the Hereafter believe in this (Book) (the Quran*), - - -”. Wrong. There are many who believe in a next life, but do not believe in the Quran - f. ex. Jews and Christians, but also many others.

406 6/92g: “Those who believe in the Hereafter believe in this (Book) (the Quran*), - - (-”. Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that you have to believe in Yahweh and his book to end in the good part of the claimed Hereafter. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

407 6/92h: "- - - they (Muslims*) are constant in guarding their Prayers". Why? - if it is true what the Quran claims many places, that Allah has predestined everything for you in accordance with his unchangeable Plan, which nothing and no-one can change, no prayer can change his predestinations - prayers to Allah thus are meaningless and a waste of time. (Muslims never - never - mention this).

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

408 6/93a: "Who can be more wicked than one who inventeth a lie against Allah, or saith, 'I have received inspiration', when he hath received none - - -." A very ironic verse if the Quran is made up - and it is from no god with all those mistakes, etc. But if Muhammad made it up he had one big truth to rely on: He could lie and he could make up anything he wanted; there was no Allah to punish him.

409 6/93b: "Who can be more wicked than one who inventeth a lie against Allah, or saith, 'I have received inspiration', when he hath received none - - -." Something to think about for Muslims if Muhammad or someone made up the Quran

410 6/93c: "- - - inspiration - - -". Muhammad claimed he got most of his claimed information from his god by means of inspiration - a very convenient way, especially if some things in reality are made up, as it is impossible for others to check if it is true, and also easy for a claimed prophet to add or subtract or simply to make up. Remember here that all the mistakes etc. in the Quran proves at least 110% that it is not from a god, and someone or someone(s) has/have to have made it. In this verse two things are the subject: Prevent that others got the idea to make (competing?) inspirations", and to stress the claim that his own "inspirations" were reliable. We may here remind you that the word "inspiration" never is used in such connection in the Bible - 4. Mos. 12/6-8 tells that Yahweh speaks to his prophets directly, in visions or in dreams - inspiration is not an alternative. Muhammad also never tells how he sees the difference between Allah's inspirations and his own - all humans have inspirations now and then. Neither does he mention how he can be sure the ones not his own, are from a god and not from a sick brain (remember TLE) or from a dressed up member of the dark forces (Muhammad would have no chance to see the difference if it was f.x. a dressed up Iblis (the Muslim devil) posing as Gabriel).

411 6/93d: "- - - reveal - - -". See 2/2b and 4/47c above.

412 6/93e: "- - - what Allah hath revealed (the Quran*) - - -". If Allah has revealed the Quran, he is no omniscient god - far too much is wrong.

413 6/93f: "- - - see how the wicked (do fare) in the flood of confusion at death!" See 3/77b above.

414 6/93g: "- - - the wicked - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names mainly for non-Muslims - names which even today influence Muslims' view of non-Muslims; non-Muslims are no good. (If the Quran had been a modern novel, it had been prohibited in many or most civilized countries for among other things incitement to discrimination.) 

415 6/93g: "- - - this day (the Day of Doom*) shall ye (non-Muslims*) receive your reward - a penalty of shame - - -". If Allah exists and is a god like described in the Quran, and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about this. Also see 3/77b above.

416 6/93h: “- - - His (Allah's*) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

417 6/94a: "- - - We (Allah*) created you - - -". Frequently claimed, never proved. Also see 2/22d above and 21/56c below.

418 6/94b: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) have left behind you all (the favors) which We (Allah*) bestowed on you - - -" - because you did not believe and obey Allah and Muhammad - in this world Muhammad. As for Jews and Christians at least this is strongly contradicted by the Bible. Not to mention that it may be contradicted by reality as the Quran is not from a god - too much is wrong in the book for any god to be involved. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

419 6/94c:"- - - your (non-Muslims'*) intercessors whom ye thought to be your partners - - -". = Other gods than Allah.

420 6/94d: "- - - your (pet) fancies have left you in the lurch!" = Your other gods than Allah cannot help you. This may be true, but only on two conditions:

That Allah really exists and is a mighty god - correctly described in the Quran.

That no other god - f. ex. Yahweh - exists.

*421 6/95a: “It is Allah Who causeth the seed grain and the date stone to split and sprout.” (A sign according to 6/97-99). Once more a natural phenomenon - or two - which Muhammad gave Allah the credit for, without one single proof. It is impressive to give a god so much credit - - - especially if the audience is uneducated and naïve enough to believe without proof, or really to believe in spite of invalid proofs and in spite of proofs for that something is really wrong. Easy victims for cheaters and deceivers f.x.

422 6/95b: "He (Allah*) causeth the living to issue from the dead - - -". This is an interesting claim, because there nowhere and at no time was proved that this is anything but cheap words; Allah never proved he could create life or resurrect the dead - many claims, no proofs - whereas if the Quran and/or the Bible tell the truth here, Yahweh has proved it many times. F.x. there are at least 8 resurrections + Jesus - 1. Kings 17/22, 2. Kings 4/34-35Mark 5/11 (+ Matt. 9/25, 8/55), John 11/44, Luke 7/15, Acts 9/40, Acts 20/10 + Jesus himself - of dead humans in NT (general confirmation in the Quran in 5/110i).

423 6/95c: "It is Allah who causeth (more or less everything*)." Well, we point to some of the very many loose and never documented and thus invalid claims in the Quran (you meet even more when you debate with Muslims). There are many. Use your brain and your knowledge, and you will find plenty of them".

424 6/95d: “- - - then how are ye (non-Muslims*) deluded away from the truth? (the Quran*)”. With that many mistakes and that much wrong logic, etc., the Quran at best is partly the truth. And it is an open question who is deluded away from the truth - the ones blind from religion or the others. Mentally blind persons normally are the easiest ones to delude.

425 6/95e: “- - - then how are ye (non-Muslims*) deluded away from the truth? (the Quran*)”. With that many mistakes like in the Quran, it is quite likely it is the Muslims who are deluded - at least the Quran with all its errors is not from a god.

426 6/95f: "- - - the truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

427 6/96a: "He (Allah*) is it that cleaveth the daybreak (from the dark) - - -". One more of the many places where Muhammad without proving anything takes a natural phenomenon and tells this is done by Allah. Totally without value as an indication or a proof for Allah unless it first is proved that it really is Allah who does this - for one thing it is only a claim, and for another any priest in any religion as cheaply can claim just the same on behalf of his god(s). Also see 11/7a below.

428 6/96b: “He (Allah*) makes the night for rest and tranquility - - -“. One more natural phenomenon that Muhammad claimed for his god (see 11/7a below) – and as always without a single proof. But the main thing just here is that night for sleep is not a prerequisite for life – on the contrary sleep at night (or at day for some animals) is an adaptation made by life to the fact that it is dark parts of the time. There is much life in total darkness - and a lot of life in perpetual daylight during summers in the far south and far north - any god had known.

429 6/96c: “He makes - - - the sun and the moon for the reckoning (of time)”. Wrong. They - and especially the sun - are natural phenomena which are essential to life on Earth (the moon may have been essential to the emergence of life, at least on dry land). It so happens that they are ok for reckoning time, but they are not made for it. (Actually they hardly are made even especially for sustaining life on Earth.)

It is very clear from the following verses and notes that Islam claims the Quran is sent down from a god – revealed by the god to Muhammad - and to his followers via Muhammad. Muslims also claim the book is clear and that everything is easy to understand - - - except when there are points that clearly are wrong. Then the texts suddenly are allegories and/or must be understood from a special context – or “cannot be understood correctly unless you have the full overview over the whole book”.

430 6/96d: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, never clearly proved. Never.

431 6/96e: "- - - (Allah is*) the Omniscient". Not if he made the Quran - too much is wrong there.

**432 6/97a: “It is He (Allah*) Who maketh the stars (as beacons) for you - - -” - and fastened to the lowest heaven, as we know from other places in the Quran - and also used as shooting stars to chase away bad spirits, according to the same book. That the stars are lights and weapons fastened to the lowest heavens - below the moon according to the astronomy of that time - destroys the credibility of Muhammad concerning this unproved statement about a natural phenomenon like the stars. Even worse: It is not just a statement; it is a sign for Allah - invalid like all the others. A small remark: Use of false proofs often is the hallmark of cheats and deceivers.

More essential just here: That the mighty and distant stars are made just for being beacons for tiny beings on a far-away minor planet is unlikely to a very high power.

433 6/97b: “It is He (Allah*) Who maketh the stars (as beacons) for you that ye may guide yourself, with their help, through the dark spaces of land and sea: We detail Our Signs for people who know”. Well, but where is the proof for that Allah had anything to do with the making of the stars at all? The Quran even flagrantly proves that Allah/Muhammad have not the faintest idea neither of what the stars are nor where they are (according to the Quran they are points of fire that even can be used for weapons against bad spirits, fastened to the nonexistent lowest of 7 material heavens - which means that according to the astronomy of that time they are situated somewhere between the Earth and our moon (as the moon was fastened to another heaven, that could not be the lowest one + it is said it is between the heavens)). Some “sign” and some "detailed explanation"!

434 6/97c: “- - - Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

435 6/97d: "- - - for people who know." This is quite an ironic sentence, as the stars hardly were made for the purpose of being bacons for people on tiny Tellus (Earth) for an (astronomically) short time. But there is psychology behind the words: Who does not want to be reckoned among knowing, intelligent people - and who wants to admit he/she does not belong to those? Flattery often works.

436 6/98a: “It is He (Allah*) Who hath produced you (man*) - - -". Often claimed, never proved - and as easily claimed about their god(s) for believers of other religions - - - free of charge for them as well as for Muhammad as long as no proofs are required. Besides, if you take a look at how the Quran claims man was created (11/7a below) it does not leave the book much credibility.

437 6/98b: “It is He (Allah*) Who hath produced you (man*) from a single person (Adam*) - - -”. According to science it takes two to make a baby. But that aside: Where is the proof for that any god - not to mention Allah - is involved at all? One thing is that Adam never existed – man developed from earlier primates according to science. Another thing is that 1 person – even 1 pair of persons – would give too little DNA-variety to make man as a viable race. One more invalid sign.

438 6/98c: (A6/82 – in 2008 edition A6/83): “- - - here is a place of sojourn and a place of departure - - -.” But the word “mustaqarr”, literal meaning (translated from Swedish): “destination”, “decision”, is a source for wild disagreement among the Muslim scholars. It may be meant a place to live, it may be meant the womb of your mother (as a fetus), it may mean a point where things reach its end or fulfillment. Just pick your choice. Allah uses a clear and distinct language in the Quran? - easy to understand and impossible to misunderstand?

439 6/98d: "We (Allah*) detail Our Signs - - -". There is no help in detailing them when everything is wrong and/or invalid.

440 6/98e: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

441 6/98f: "- - - people who understand". But who is it who really understands? - the one who can be flattered into admitting or accepting Muhammad and his religion? - or he who really thinks thing over and find out what is right and what must be wrong? Also see 6/97d above.

442 6/99a: “It is He (Allah*) Who sendeth down rain from the skies - - -". One more natural phenomenon any believer can claim for his god(s) glory - just like Muhammad does. Such claims cost nothing as long as one does not have to prove anything. See 11/7a below.

443 6/99b: “It is He (Allah*) Who sendeth down rain from the skies - - - in these things there are Signs for people who believe”. Yes, but only if Islam proves it really is Allah who causes it, or (wrongly) if they believe blindly and has no education about how the water cycle works - without any traces from an involved god and absolutely no sign specific for Allah. Flattery added is cheap oil.

**444 6/99c: “- - - with it (rain) We (Allah*) produce vegetation of all kinds - - - in these things there are Signs for people who believe.” Well vegetation grows no matter in the nature. We only have the words of one single man for that Allah is involved - a man who Islam itself admits is a highwayman, an extorter, an assassin of opponents, a mass murderer of helpless prisoners, a womanizer, a rapist, a breaker of his words (f. ex. by killing 29 men - 1 got away - he had promised safe conduct), an enslaver "en masse", etc., aspiring for power - all in all a perfect and absolutely reliable witness according to himself and to Islam. And not to mention his slogan according to Ibn Ishaq: "War is betrayal" - betrayal and even breaking of one’s oaths was ok. Well, flattery feels good at least – especially for people naïve enough to believe everything they want to believe.

445 6/99d: “- - - from some We (Allah*) produce green (crops) - - - in these there are Signs for people who believe”. See the 6/99a and 6/99b above.

446 6/99e: “- - - out of which (green crops*) We (Allah*) produce grain - - - in these there are Signs for people who believe”. See 6/99a and 6/99b above. Flattery is cheap.

447 6/99f: “- - - out of the date palm and its sheaths (or spathes) (come) clusters of dates hanging low and near: and (then there are) gardens of grapes, and olives, and pomegranates, each similar (in kind) yet different (in variety) - - - in these things are Signs for people who believe”. See 6/99a-e above.

448 6/99g: "- - - Signs - - -". Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

449 6/100a: "Jinns" - beings "borrowed" from pagan Arab religion and Arab fairy tales. They are strange creatures to tell about for universal god, as they mainly exist only in old Arab pagan religion and folklore (though they do exist also in old Jewish tales, but not in their religion) Islam even today disputes what they really are, but most agree on that they are individuals of quite another kind than humans, but all the same not dissimilar. There exist Islamic laws for marriage between jinns and humans, so they have to be material beings. They are not demons, but another kind of invisible beings - ruled by Allah like en, and like man claimed in a not explainable way to all the same have free will. Most of them seem to end in Hell in the claimed next life.

450 6/100b: "Jinns" - an Arabism. You only find them in and around Arabia (included traces of them in the old Jewish culture, though slightly different spelled).

451 6/100c: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) - - - attribute to Him sons and daughters." In the old pagan religion al-Lah (the name means "the god" - not "God" but "the god" - Muhammad changed the name slightly to Allah) was the main god and often said to be the moon god. Many Arabs thought the other gods were his children, with three of his daughters, al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat, as the three main ones - the 3 Muhammad accepted in the famous "Satanic Verses" (but later changed his mind).

452 6/100d: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a below.

453 6/100e: "- - - sons - - -". Simply Jesus. Muhammad could not accept that Jesus perhaps was son of the god. For one thing he thought it would spoil his claim about only one god (not correct - Christians believe in Jesus, but all the same only one god, Jesus' father Yahweh). For another: Muhammad wanted to be the greatest of prophets, which was impossible if Jesus is the son of the god.

454 6/100f: "Praise and glory be to Him (Allah*)!" See 1/1a above and see if you think he is worth this - - - if he exists and is correctly described in the Quran.

455 6/100g: "- - - (Allah is*) above what they (many non-Muslims*) attribute to Him!" Here is meant he is above having children - but who knows what a god likes? And when it comes to Yahweh and Jesus, Jesus many times called Yahweh his father, and called himself the son - and even the Quran tells that Jesus was reliable.

456 6/101a: “To him (Allah*) is due the primal origin (= creation*) of the heavens (plural and wrong*) - - -”. Proof? Claims are easy and cheap, and can be used by anybody. But in so serious a case as Heaven versus Hell Islam demands blindness - blind belief. Yes, not even blind belief, but blind belief in a very unreliable and immoral man.

457 6/101b: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

458 6/101c: “- - - how can he (Yahweh*) have a son when He hath no consort?” Wrong - and the Quran has itself given one possible solution: It declares that the god may just say “Be” and it is. May be Yahweh just said “Be a son”, and Jesus was.

**But there is another, but little known fact: In the very old Jewish religion there was a female god, too. They spoke about the god and his Amat (source among others “New Scientist”). In the very masculine society of the old Hebrews, the goddess was forgotten, though, - - - but it was possible for Yahweh to have a son “the natural way”. Gods would know this, but Muhammad not. Also see 17/111.

But why should gods make children the same way as humans and animals? Similar claim in 18/5 – 112/3.

###459 6/101d: "He (Allah*) created all things - - -". A glorifying claim - but as normal for Muhammad never proved. Big words are easy to use when you do not have to prove them. We remind you of "claims without proofs can be dismissed without proofs" (this even more so at it is the one who makes a claim, who has the duty of proving it - not the others to disprove it like Muslims claim. Muslims has found the easy way here to dupe and trap the naive and the uneducated ones. Demand proofs from Muslims for what they claim before starting an argument. You will find they never are able to prove any of the central claims in Islam. Would you risk your money in a "Nigerian Bluff" or "Nigerian swindle"? - some naive ones do, and every single of them till this day has lost. More than a billion humans - many of whom would laugh at gambling their money on demands for blind belief - gamble their possible next life on demanded blind belief in a documented - even documented by Islam - unreliable and immoral man wrapped in glorious words, and in his never proved, but often clearly proved wrong, claims.

Such is the truth about man's intelligence.

460 6/101e: “- - - He (Allah*) hath full knowledge of all things.” Something is seriously wrong here: The Quran and all its mistakes prove that either Allah did not make the Quran, or he had far from knowledge of all things. Also see 2/233h above.

461 6/102a: "There is no god but He (Allah*) - - -". Well, not mentioning other claimed gods in different religions, there still remains Yahweh. The basics of Islam and the basics especially of NT are so different that they cannot be the same god, no matter what wishful thinking and not documented claims the Quran or Muslims put forth. (One possibility: The two may really be one god, if the god is strongly schizophrenic.) If there is one, but just one god, that means that only Allah or only Yahweh can exist. And Allah only is to be found in a book with hundreds and more mistakes, told by a man with very suspect moral and liking power, using Allah - real or made up - as his platform of power. Well, of course Allah is to be found in the old pagan Arab religion, then obeying(?) the name al-Lah - "the god". Whereas there after all is a chance for that Yahweh exists - there f.x. were so many witnesses to Jesus' miracles, death and resurrection, that one may wonder.

462 6/102b: "- - - (Allah is*) the Creator of all things - - -". See 6/101e above and 21/56c below. Also contradicted by the Bible, which claims Yahweh was the creator. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

463 6/102c "- - - He (Allah*) hath the power to dispose of all affairs". Never proved, often claimed.

464 6/103a: "He (Allah*) is above all comprehension - - -". Not if he is a made up god.

465 6/103b: "(Allah*) is acquainted with all things" - so watch your steps. Also see 2/233h above.

466 6/104a: “Now have (the Quran*) come - - - from your Lord (Allah*) - - -”. No omnipotent god ever created a book with so many mistakes, so many contradictions, so much wrong logic, and honestly so low quality literature (in spite of all the glorious words from religious Muslims), not to mention kept it as a revered "Mother Book" in his own Heaven, like the Quran itself claims at least 2 places. See 13/39, 43/4, 85/21-22 below.

467 6/104b: “Now have (the Quran*) come to you (Muslims*), from your Lord (Allah*), proofs - - -”. Wrong. In all the Quran there is not one single valid proof for Allah or for Islam - or for Muhammad being a real messenger (he definitely was no prophet, as he had not – and did not even claim or pretend to have – the ability to make prophesies). Not one single proof that proves any god at all the Quran and in all Islam. There MAY BE a few exceptions in the tales taken from the Bible, but they in case talk about Yahweh not Allah, and Islam in case will have to prove that Allah and Yahweh really is the same god - a statement only based on unproved claims in the Quran and in Hadith, and a statement which have never in any way been documented - and a statement clearly disproved by the many deep and central and essential differences between the fundamentals of teachings. All the statements are only based on thin air and cheap words - words that any priest in any religion can use about his or her god(s). They are worth nothing as proofs.

The Quran some places talks about “proofs” and many places where it talks about “signs”. They all have that in common that they without exception are without value as proofs for Allah of for Muhammad's connection to a god. After all a proof is one or more PROVED facts which can give only one conclusion - and the Quran and Islam NEVER proves the claims they build their "signs" and "proofs" for Allah or for Muhammad's connection to a god on. NEVER. If f. ex. heaven and earth shall be proofs for Allah, Islam first has to prove that it really was Allah that made them - not only say so. If rain shall be a proof for Allah, Islam first has to prove that it really is Allah that makes and directs the rain, not just say so, because this any religion can say - valueless as a proof (Baal makes the rivers run downwards. Allah cannot make them run upwards. ERGO: Baal is the real god and Allah just an impostor. Etc., etc., etc. Valueless “proofs“.) If life on Earth is to be a proof for Allah, Islam first have to prove that it really was Allah that created it - not just use empty statements any priest in any religion can use free of charge. Etc., etc., etc.

The Quran is very good at demanding proofs from all other religions, but it never, NEVER, offers any valid proofs about Allah or the Quran or Muhammad’s connection to a god itself when it comes to disputed “truths” (it offers “proofs“ and “signs“, but they are not valid). And it is extra thought-provoking that the times it says that this and this is a proof, and the many, many times it says that this and this is a sign, the statements are without exception just statements taken out of thin air or in other ways not built on proved facts - nothing that a judge would accept as proofs in a neutral, good quality court. Nothing. Any god would know the statements were without value as real proofs, and not call them - or hint that they are - proofs. It is just cheap words and demagogy that any priest in any religion can use free of charge. Sorry, but that is the very plain truth.

And in reality it is even worse: Who use loose statements, invalid arguments and invalid proofs and demands for blind belief? - cheats and impostors and swindlers! It actually tells something about a god if he is trying to cheat the simple and the simpleminded and the uneducated ones - not to mention what it tells about him if he did not understand that one time humans would get enough knowledge to see through the cheating, and even more so if Allah did not understand what effect such “proofs” made up of mistakes and bluffing would have on educated, thinking persons when they discovered the claims were untrue.

For similar claims see 2/41 – 2/91 - 2/117 – 2/147 – 2/176 – 2/213 – 3/3 – 3/7 - 3/60 – 4/105 – 4/113 – 4/140 – 5/15 – 6/91 – 6/92 - 6/104 – 6/114 – 6/155 – 7/52 – 10/94 – 10/108 – 11/17 – 12/2 – 13/36 – 15/9 – 16/64 – 17/73 – 17/82 – 17/105 – 17/106 – 18/27 – 18/29 – 20/113 – 21/10 – 21/45 - 22/54 – 23/90 – 24/1 - 24/25 – 25/1 – 25/6 - 28/47 – 38/53 – 32/2 – 32/3 – 35/31 – 38/29 – 39/1 – 39/2 – 39/23 – 39/41 – 40/2 – 41/2 – 42/17 – 43/78 – 55/2 – 64/8 – 69/43 – 76/23.

Have you ever noticed that the one who needs to boast – loudly and frequently – about how truthful he is, is the cheater and deceiver, and the one boasting about his knowledge is the mediocre to rather ok, but not top intelligent and learned one? – the really honest and the really intelligent and knowledgeable persons never need to boast about those things. Real honesty and real intelligence makes itself felt after some time of close connection – if there is a need for boasting, something is wrong. And as it here are lots of claims about speaking the truth, we may quote the Nazi-German Minister for Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels: “If you tell a lie often enough, people starts believing it is true.” (There is a lot of similarity between the ideology behind Nazism and the one behind Islam).

And we also remind you: "Claims without proofs can be dismissed without proofs" as they are without value.

##468 6/104c: "Now have (the Quran*) come - - - from your (Muslim's) Lord (Allah*) - - - I (Muhammad*) am not here to watch over your (people's) doings". THIS IS A SERIOUS ONE: Here it is Muhammad who is speaking - - - in a book presumably made eons ago in Heaven!!! - an impossibility and a clear contradiction of the Islamic claim that it is a copy of the Mother Book in the Heaven. (There are some 8 such cases in the Quran, and at least one case where angels are speaking - see 6/114a below.) Clear proof(s) for that the Quran is not from Heaven - at least not all of it. This lines up with facts like:

There are lots and lots of mistakes in the book.

There are lots and lots of invalid “signs” and “proofs” in the book.

There are lots and lots and lots of invalid statements in the book.

There are lots and lots of contradictions in the book.

There are lots and lots of unclear language in the book.

This proves 100% or more that the Quran is not made by an omniscient god.)

469 6/104d: "- - - if any will see (the claimed truth in the Quran's teaching*) it will be for (the good of) his own soul - - -". Islam is "to one’s own good" only if the Quran is from a god - which it is not with all those errors - and tells the full truth and only the truth.

470 6/104e: "- - - is any will be blind, it will be to his own (harm) - - -". Here it is symptomatic that it is the Quran which demands blindness - blind belief - whereas skepticism towards that book permits open eyes.

471 6/104f: “- - - I (Muhammad*) am not (here) to watch over your doings.” One year later Muhammad started to watch everybody’s’ doing, too – and strictly so little by little. This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 29 contradictions).

472 6/105a: "Thus do We (Allah*) explain the (claimed*) Signs by various (symbols) - - -". You will find similar claims here and there in the Quran, but the Quran never explains anything about its claimed "signs" and "proofs", it only makes claims about them.

473 6/105b: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

474 6/105c: "- - - We (Allah*) may make the matter clear to those who know". Those who know are completely aware of that it is not possible to make things clear by means of a book full of mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, etc. And some of them are too intelligent to be moved by cheap flattery.

475 6/105d: "- - - those who know". Psychology. The expression indicates it is a truth accepted by the learned ones - though it in reality only is a not proved claim. And in addition: Who wants to admit he/she has no knowledge+

476 6/106a: "Follow what thou (Muhammad*) are thought (the Quran*) by inspiration from thy Lord (Allah*) - - -". No god did teach the Quran - too much is wrong.

##477 6/106b: "- - - there is no god but He (Allah*) - - -". Often claimed in Islam, but never proved.

There actually is no natural law prohibiting more than one god. (The Quran tries to claim this one or a few places, but uses invalid arguments and invalid logic). Or prohibiting even no god.

But if we for the sake of simplicity say that polytheism is out, there still remains the problem with Yahweh - the god of Jews and Christians.

Yahweh is an old god - he (his religion) can be traced by science all the way back through history and far into prehistory. If the books are reliable on this point, there is no doubt about his existence and his power - this according to both the Bible and the Quran.

There is not one single trace of the Muslim version of Allah - or of his claimed earlier prophets (except the Biblical ones) - older than 610 AD, not within ANY kind of science: Archeology, architecture, art, literature, history - not even in legends or in fairy tales.

Allah only - only - exists in a book full of mistakes, and dictated by a man believing in al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), etc., and wanting power and money for bribes and women - - - and according to Islamic sources with few qualms about how he got hold of it (including using a new religion as his platform of power).

To make matter worse: That book is so full of mistakes, contradictions, etc. and except for polished language of such an amateur quality, that no god was involved in it - to claim the opposite is slander and an insult and heresy against the god one blames the work on.

There is nowhere even the smallest trace of a mosque older than 610 AD (Kabah in Mecca may partly be older, but that was a pagan temple taken over by Muhammad).

There nowhere exists one single proof for the existence of Allah or for Muhammad’s connection to a god

There are hundreds and more of mistakes, contradictions, unclear language, etc. and even some obvious lies in the Quran - 110% proofs for that it is not from a god.

Muhammad tried to claim - and with considerable success - that Yahweh was the same god as Allah, and that Allah thus was an old and mighty god.

But the fundamental differences between the two teachings and also between the codes of moral and ethics of the two, and other things, are so many and so deep, that this claim simply is not true (one possible exception: If the god is deeply schizophrenic).

Muhammad tried to explain the differences by claiming - as always without a proof - that the Bible is falsified. Modern science has long since proved that this is not true (some 44ooo relevant manuscripts and each and every one of them without any trace of falsification). Islam has proved it even stronger: If there had existed one single real falsification, the world had been told about it several times a day.

Then there is the question of the Bible, which both in OT (f.x. several places in Isaiah 44 and 45) and many places in NT declare that there is no god but Yahweh - in spite of Muhammad's claims a very different god.

And not to forget: If Allah all the same exists, there remains the question: What is he? He is no god - no god delivers a book of a quality like the Quran. But he may be something from the dark forces dressed up to cheat Muhammad. Muhammad would not have a chance to see the difference. (Personally we doubt that even a devil would make such a sorry book like the Quran - he had to know all the errors would be discovered sooner or later, and he would loose credibility. But there is the chance that may be there was a god prohibiting him to use anything better - - - and he also might have taken into account the standard human religious blindness - the inability many humans have to see what they do not wish to see.

Decide for yourself: What are the chances for that Allah exists and in case is a lone god?

478 6/106c: "- - - by inspiration - - -". Convenient claim: Impossible to check - and easy to change or add or falsify. But also: Inspiration from where? No god - too much is wrong in the book. Hardly a devil - too much is wrong in the book, and he knew he would be looked through sooner or later (though possible if the god made the mistakes a condition for permitting the Devil to make the book - to make it possible for man to see the trap). An illness - like TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy)? A helper - or some helpers? Muhammad himself? Make your own guess.

479 6/106d: "- - - by inspiration - - -". Muhammad claimed he mainly got his messages from his claimed god by inspiration, and he frequently claimed that the old Jewish prophets got their messages the same way. This is contradicted by the Bible. This way of communication is never mentioned there - Yahweh stated he used 3 ways: Direct contact, visions and dreams (4. Mos. 12/6-8) - inspiration was not an alternative. Thus Muhammad's claim here is wrong at least concerning the old prophets included Jesus. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

480 6/106e: "- - - and turn aside from those who join gods with Allah." But to turn aside was what Muslims had to do before they became strong enough to react strictly. This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

481 6/106f: "- - - turn aside from those who join gods with Allah". Do not mingle with non-Muslims.

482 6/106g: "- - - join gods with Allah". See 25/18a below.

483 6/107a: “If it had not been Allah’s Plan, they (non-Muslims*) would not have taken false gods - - -” There is a certain class of people who find out where people wants to go, then walks in front of them, telling everyone that they are leading the people. You often find them in politics and in organizations. They make us think of this verse. If only Allah willed - - -! In addition: HOW - H O W!! - can an omniscient and omnipotent god presumed to be a good and benevolent god, damn humans to Hell for taking other gods, when they did so because of his own plans???! This also is incompatible with the Bible.

484 6/107b: "- - - Allah's Plan - - -". This is the reason for and the origin of all predestination: Allah's Plan which nobody and nothing can change even a nanometer.

485 6/107c: “- - - but We (Allah*) made thee (Muhammad*) not one to watch over their (“infidels’) doing - - -.” This verse is abrogated – made invalid - by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

586 6/107d: "- - - nor art thou (Muhammad*) set over them (non-Muslims*) to dispose of their affairs". Similar to 6/107c just above.

487 6/108a: "Reveille not ye (Muhammad/Muslims*) those whom they call upon besides Allah, lest they out of spite reveille Allah in their ignorance." This you could forget when Islam became strong enough to punish instead of being polite. This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

488 6/108b: "- - - those they call upon besides Allah - - -". = Other gods.

489 6/108c: "- - - (other gods*) besides Allah - - -". See 25/18a below.

####490 6/108d: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”.

Comment A6/92 (A6/93 in the 2008 English edition): “Lit., ‘thus godly have we made….', etc. implying that it is in the nature of man to regard the belief which have been implanted in him from babyhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones – whit the result that a polemic against those beliefs often tends to provoke a hostile psychological reaction.” This is said as an explanation why Islam sometimes meets a negative reaction. But the book skips the fact that this also goes for Muslims: If they are strongly indoctrinated, they may react strongly to arguments and facts they do not like – and without thinking over – or being mentally able to think over – even true facts. This is likely to be the explanation for why most Muslims are able to be blind to all the mistakes and proofs for that things are very wrong in the Quran and thus with Muhammad and in Islam.

491 6/108e: “Thus have We (Allah*) made alluring to each people its own doings”. This sentence should be extremely thought-provoking also to Muslims.

492 6/108f: "In the end (at the Day of Doom*) will they (people*) return to their Lord (Allah*) - - -". Only if Allah exists and is a major god - and if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

493 6/108g: "- - - the truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

494 6/109a: "They (non-Muslims contemporary to Muhammad*) swear their strongest oaths - - - (etc.*)". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

495 6/109b: "They (non-Muslims contemporary to Muhammad*) swear their strongest oaths by Allah, that if a (special) Sign came to them, by it they would believe". This is entirely in accordance with human nature - produce miracles and most people will believe. But Muhammad was unable to produce any miracle, and instead had to use fast-talk to "explain" away the request and the clear logical fact.

496 6/109c: "They (non-Muslims contemporary to Muhammad*) swear their strongest oaths by Allah, that if a (special) Sign came to them, by it they would believe". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

497 6/109d: "- - - (special) Sign - - -". See 2/39b above.

498 6/109e: "Certainly (all) Signs are in the power of Allah." A big claim. But a big claim anyone can make on behalf of his god(s) as long as there only are words - words are that cheap. An invalid claim and an invalid proof. Also see 14/19d below.

499 6/109f: "Certainly (all) Signs are in the power of Allah - - -". A power often claimed, but never proved".

500 6/109g: "Certainly - - -". See 2/2b above.

501 6/109h: "- - - (all) Signs - - -". See 2/39b above.

##502 6/109i: “- - - what will make you (Muslims) realize that (even) if (special) Signs came, they (non-Muslims*) will not believe?” Wrong. If there were real proofs of a god - miracles - at least a good number of people would believe - that is a psychological fact (look f.x. at the Pharaoh’s magicians and at the results of Jesus' miracles). The sentence really is fast-talk to “explain” away why Allah/Muhammad was unable to produce unmistakable proofs for Allah. Worse: An intelligent man like Muhammad knew this argument is a lie - and all the same he used it frequently. This simply is one of the places in the Quran where Muhammad knew he was lying.

503 6/109j: "- - - (special) Sign - - -". Wrong. See 2/39b above.

504 6/110a: "We (Allah*)(too) shall turn to (confusion) their hearts and their ("unbelievers'*) "eyes - - -". Jesus and Yahweh were searching for "the lost lambs". Muhammad and Allah make their way back to belief difficult or impossible. The same god? No.

505 6/110b: "We (Allah*) shall leave them ("unbelievers") in their trespasses - - -." See 6/110a just above.

506 6/111a: “Even if We (Allah*) did send unto them (non-Muslims*) angels, and the dead did speak unto them, and We gathered together all things before their very eyes, they are not the ones to believe, unless it is Allah’s plan”. This may be understood in two ways – both quite fast talk:

Another and strengthen variety of no. 7/120a and others - with Muhammad lying in the Quran.

Some of Muhammad’s audience questioned the obviously wrong logic and psychology in that clear proofs would not impress anybody, and needed a reason why not – and got the all-encompassing and ultimate answer to all difficult or unanswerable questions: It is Allah’s will - sometimes the fastest of all fast-talk.

This is one of the places in the Quran where Muhammad knew he was lying - produce some real miracles, and at least some will believe, and this even more so in old times with naive, uneducated, superstitious people, not as skeptical towards such things as people nowadays - it was easier to make people believe.

507 6/111b: “- - - they (non-Muslims*) are not the ones to believe, unless it is Allah’s Plan”. This is even worse than 6/107a above - Allah simply has made it impossible for non-Muslims to become Muslims, if it does not fit him. But still he condemns them to Hell!!! Predestination at its worst - perhaps except when luring people to their death or mutilation in battle.

No comment could possibly explain our point of view or distaste.

508 6/111c: “But most of them (non-Muslims*) ignore the (truth (the Quran*)).” With that many mistakes, that much wrong logic, etc., that book at best is only partly the truth.

509 6/111d: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

510 6/112a: "- - - by way of deception". Muhammad Ali here has an interesting comment: "- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) was asked: 'Are there Satans from among men?' - and he replied, 'Yes, and they are more evil than Satans from among the invisible beings - - -". When one knows about all the inhumanities, immoral parts of the moral code, etc. Muhammad introduced, and when one knows all he demanded and did, one may start thinking from such a piece of information.

511 6/112b: "- - - (non-Muslims*) inspiring each other with flowery discourses by way of deception." This is a nice piece of pep-talk, explaining-away, and inducement for his followers not to believe what non-Muslims told them. But is it true?

512 6/112c:"If thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) had so planned - - -". See 14/19d below.

513 6/112d: "If thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) had so planned, they (non-Muslims*) would not have done it (believed in other gods*) - - -". What kind of god is planning so as to send millions and even billions of humans - and jinns - to Hell?!!

514 6/112e: “- - - so (Muhammad*) leave them (opponents*) and their inventions (gods*) alone.” This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

515 6/112f: “- - - so (Muhammad*) leave them (opponents*) and their inventions (gods*) alone.” This also has another meaning: Do not mingle with or listen to what the non-Muslims say - they just make up things (an easy claim for Muhammad to make).

516 6/113a: "To such (deceit) (see the verse above*) let the hearts of those (non-Muslims*) incline who have no faith in the Hereafter: let them delight in it, and let them earn from it what they may". This verse is one piece of pep-talk.

517 6/113b: "- - - (deceit) - - -". See 2/2b above.

518 6/113c: "- - - those who incline (to deceit) - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

519 6/113d: "- - - those who incline (to deceit) - - -". An ironic name and point of view, as the Quran/Islam is the only one of the big religions which in many cases accepts dishonesty - al-Taqiyya, Kitman, deceit, broken words/oaths - as working tools.

520 6/113e: "- - - let them (skeptics*) delight in it - - -". Here it is unclear whether the text refers to the Bible or to the Quran (perhaps the Quran). As mentioned before, the texts in the Quran often are unclear (in spite of Muslims' claims about it being clear and impossible to misunderstand).

##521 6/114a: “Say ‘Shall I (Muhammad*) seek for another judge than Allah?” The point here is that according to Ibn Warraq: “Why I am no Muslim” p.174, the word “Say” is not in the Arab text. Besides making a clear contradiction of claims many places in the Quran, it means two things:

It is not Allah, but Muhammad himself that is speaking. How can that be in a book claimed to be made eons ago? See 1/1-7a above.

Even a top Muslim translator like Abdullah Yusuf Ali “doctors” his translations a “tiny wee bit” to make the Quran sound more correct. How much more is “doctored” – and how much is "doctored" in translations of the Quran from lower quality translators? (And it was the same at least in 2/286c - we have been told there at least are 8 cases of this.)

522 6/114b: "Shall I (Muhammad*) seek for judge another than Allah?" It might be an idea - if he judges according to the sharia laws he sometimes is quite unjust. And parts of his moral code is even worse.

523 6/114c: “- - - He (Allah*) it is Who hath sent unto you (Muslims*) the Book (the Quran*)”. Wrong. Taken into account the many mistakes, etc. that at least needs d proofs. No god delivers a book of a quality like the Quran with all its errors, etc.

##524 6/114d: "- - - the Book (the Quran*), explained in detail - - -". If it is explained in detail, then made up claims about other explanations or allegories to explain away mistakes, etc. clearly are wrong.

525 6/114e: "They (non-Muslims*) know fully well, to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (the Quran*) - - -". Wrong - and a correction: What some of them knew fully well, was that the Quran was not from the same god as the Bible - too many fundamental points were too different.

526 6/114f: “- - - it (the Quran*) hath been sent down from thy (Muslims’*) Lord (Allah) - - -“. No omniscient god ever sent down a book with that many mistakes, contradictions, logical blunders, etc., not to mention kept is as a revered "mother book" in his own Heaven (13/39, 43/4, 85/21-22), like the Quran also claims – as usual without any documentation or proof.

527 6/114g: “- - - it (the Quran*) hath been sent down from thy (Muslims*) Lord (Allah*) in truth”. At best partly the truth. Also see 2/2b above.

528 6/114h: (A6/99 – in 2008 English edition A6/101): “They know full well, to whom We (Allah*) have sent the Book (in this case: The Bible or the Quran?), that it hath been sent down from thy Lord in truth.” Well, is it here the Bible or the Quran that is sent down in truth? Who knows? Clear language in the Quran?

529 6/114i: "Never be then of those who doubt". - not even when there is reason for doubt! - yes, not even when the Quran is proved multiple wrong.

530 6/115a: "The words (the Quran*) of your Lord (Allah*) - - -". Wrong. No god made or sent down a book with that much wrong.

531 6/115b: “The words (the Quran*) of thy Lord (Allah*) doth find its fulfillment in truth”. As said many times: With that many mistakes, contradictions, cases of invalid logic, etc., it maximum is partly the truth. Also see 2/2a above and 13/1g and 40/75 below.

532 6/115c: “The words (the Quran*) of thy Lord (Allah*) doth find its fulfillment in truth”. Some Muslims claim this is a reference to the wrong claim that Muhammad is foretold in the Bible, but the Quran here does not indicate such a reference.

533 6/115d: "- - - in justice - - -". Not unless some parts of sharia law and large parts of the Quran's moral code is omitted.

534 6/115e: “- - - none can change His (Allah's*) Words “. Predestination and his Plan. Allah decides everything, and no-body can change anything. (Then why f. ex. pray for help or a better future, when everything already is decided and the decisions impossible to change, because nothing can change his Plan?

535 6/115f: “- - - none can change His (Allah's*) Words “. Perhaps no Muslim can, because that means that something is wrong in the foundation and fundamentals of Islam - they cannot afford to change any word in the Quran for that reason. But f.x. science can show if some - a lot - of the words in the Quran are wrong. Which they are. Also there are changes in the Quran – the differences in the old Qurans, the different “ways of reading” (a camouflaged way to talk about what in reality are varieties of the texts), the abrogated verses and the change in the religion around/after 622 AD – by whom and why? Well, whoever the maker of the Quran is, he is contradicting himself, as he clearly changes it himself when something forces him to – try and fail? Or change his mind about more blood and injustice from 622 AD on? – or because of other problems or things he has learnt?

2/106: “None of our revelations do We (Allah*) abrogate or cause to be forgotten, But We substitute something better or similar”. Words can be changed.

16/101: “When We (Allah*) substitute one revelation for another – and Allah knows best what He reveals - - -“. No doubt that he can change his own words, at least – when he did not do things right at once. (These two verses – 2/106 and 16/101 – are the main fundamentals under Islam’s rules for abrogation – making verses invalid when there are contradictions. See separate chapter about abrogation).

(2 contradictions).

536 6/115g: "- - - He (Allah*) is the One Who heareth and knoweth all". See 2/233h above.

537 6/116a: "They (non-Muslims*) follow nothing but conjecture." With that many mistakes, etc. in the Quran, it is an open question if also Muslims are following conjectures - - - and if perhaps some of the others are following a real religion (who knows?) In that case; where will all the Muslims who were denied the possibility to search for the truth - about Islam and about other religions - end in a possible next life?

538 6/116b: "- - - they (disbelievers*) do nothing but lie". Wrong: Some of them at least points to real errors, etc. in the Quran and hence in Islam.

539 6/116c: "- - - they (disbelievers*) do nothing but lie”. Is it strange that Muslims are reluctant to associate with such people? Muhammad's very negative characteristics of non-Muslims has an effect.

540 6/116d: "- - - they (disbelievers*) do nothing but lie". The irony once more: The only one of the large religions which accepts - even sometimes advices - the use of lies and dishonesty (al-Taqiyya, Kitman, deceit, betrayal, broken words/oaths), is accusing others of lying - - - and as normal for the Quran without proofs behind the claim. A lie?

541 6/117a: "Thy (Muslims'/Muhammad's*) Lord (Allah*) knoweth best who strays from His Way - - -". See 2/233h above.

542 6/117b: "- - - His /Allah's*) Way". = The road to Allah and his paradise - see 10/9f below.

543 6/117c: "- - - His (Allah's*) guidance (the Quran*)." There is no divine guidance in a book full of mistakes. Also see 7/192a and 16/107 below.

544 6/118a: "So eat of (meats) on which Allah's name hath been pronounced, if ye (Muslims*) have faith in His Signs". One of the many abrupt changes of topic which is one of the reasons why the Quran is not good literature.

545 6/118b: “- - - His (Allah's*) Signs.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

546 6/119a: "- - - except under compulsion of necessity - - -". If a Muslim is forced to or if there is strong hunger and nothing else to eat, a Muslim is not sinning even if he eats forbidden food. (The same goes if he is cheated into eating such food, honestly believing it is ok food - which means you score no point and only is impolite by f.x. cheating Muslims to eat food containing pork or blood).

547 6/119b: "- - - knowledge". See 26/83a below.

548 6/119c: "Thy Lord (Allah*) knows best those who transgress". Just a reminder: Watch your steps or Allah will punish you. But also see 2/233h above.

549 6/120: "- - - those who earn sin will get due recompense for their 'earnings'". See 3/77b above.

550 6/121: "Eat not of (meats) on which Allah's name hath not been pronounced: that would be impiety." Contradicted and abrogated 11 years later (632 AD) by 5/5: "The food of the People of the Book (here the Bible = Jews and Christians*) is lawful unto you - - -". (Though of course you can say or think the name of Allah yourself).

551 6/122a: "Can he who was dead, to whom We (Allah*) gave life - - -". This interesting claim again: Allah never proved his power over life or death - or over anything else, or even his existence. Yahweh proved it many times if either the Quran or the Bible speaks the truth on this point. This makes one think.

552 6/122b: "Can he who was dead, to whom We (Allah*) gave life - - - be like him who is in the depth of darkness - - -?" Alternative explanation: Can a man who has become a Muslim be compared to something as lowly as a non-Muslim? Of course not. (But what if the Quran is a made up book? - it at least is from no god with all those mistaken facts, etc.)

553 6/122c: "- - - a light (the Quran*) whereby he (a man*) can walk amongst men - - -". There is little light in a dark book (see the surahs from Medina) which on top of all is full of mistaken facts and other mistakes, etc.

554 6/122d: "- - - to those without Faith their own deeds seem pleasing". The same goes for Muslims, and here it is very serious, as much of what they are permitted or expected to do, sin against the constitution of all inter-human ethical and moral code, and against what a really benevolent and good god would have ordered: "Do onto others what you want others do onto you".

555 6/122e: "- - - Faith - - -". = Islam - only Islam is faith according to the Quran.

556 6/124a: “- - - a Sign (from Allah) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

557 6/124b: "We (non-Muslims*) shall not believe until we receive one (proof*) (exactly) like those received by Allah's messengers". Wrong - the only thing they asked for, was a clear proof for Allah and his power, which Muhammad never was able to deliver. Here Muhammad has twisted the truth a little - lawful in Islam (this is a Kitman - a lawful half-truth) - to be able to explain it away and to be able to make his opponents look bad.

558 6/124c: "- - - they (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say: 'We shall not believe until we receive one (proof*) (exactly) like those received by Allah's messengers". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

559 6/124d: "- - - the wicked - - -". One of the many negative names Muhammad used for non-Muslims.

560 6/124e: "- - - humiliation before Allah - - -". If Allah exists. If he in addition is a central god. And if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth about this. Also see 3/77b above.

561 6/124f: "- - - and a severe punishment - - -". See 3/77b above.

###

562 6/125a: "Those whom Allah (in his Plan) willet to guide - - -". One of the fundamental differences between Yahweh and Allah: Allah predestines your life from even before the beginning, included whether you are to end in Heaven or Hell (according to Hadiths this is decided when the fetus is 4 months old). Yahweh gives man freedom of choice, but accepts anyone - not only the ones "he willeth" - to his Paradise who honestly want and qualify. Yahweh and Allah the same god? plainly and simply no.

563 6/125b: "- - - (in His (Allah's*) Plan - - -". The predestination again. Allah has everything planned, and nothing and nobody can change anything (actually why pray to Allah for help in problems, when nothing can be changed?)

564 6/125c: "- - - guide". See 16/107 below.

565 6/125d: "- - - those (humans*) He (Allah*)willet to leave straying - - -". One of the really serious differences between NT and the Quran: Yahweh wills none to stray, according to the Bible (Luke 15/8-10, 15/11-31, Matt. 18/12-14, Matt. 20/8-13 to mention some). The same god? Not a chance.

566 6/125e: "- - - those (humans*) He (Allah*) willet to leave straying, He maketh their breast close and constricted (and makes believing difficult or impossible for them*) - - -". Here are more of the huge and fundamental differences between the Quran and NT: Actively close their hearts vs. search for the lost lamb. Not the same god by far.

567 6/125f: "- - - those (humans*) He (Allah*)willet to leave straying, He maketh their breast close and constricted (and makes believing difficult or impossible for them*) - - -". Is Allah a good god? - and is he a fair or benevolent god blocking the road to belief, and then punishing the victim and damning his/her to Hell for not believing!

568 6/125g: "- - - penalty on those who refuse to believe". See 3/77b above.

569 6/125h: "- - - those who refuse to believe". Non-Muslims.

570 6/126: "- - - Signs - - -." Invalid as proof indication or proof for Allah. See 2/39b.

571 6/127a: "For them will be A Home of Peace - - -". If Allah exists and is a top god, if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about this - and if the Islamic paradise exists.

572 6/127b: "- - - A Home of Peace - - -". Islam's Paradise - see 10/9f below.

573 6/127c: "- - - (righteousness)". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

574 6/128a: "One day - - -". Here the Day of Doom.

575 6/128aa: (A6/110 – in 2009 edition 6/112): “O ye assembly of Jinns - - -“. Normally the word “al-jinn” refers simply and directly to these supernatural beings – and here to the bad ones among them. But here the full expression is “ma’shar al-jinn”, and that complicates the situation, as “ma’shar” means someone close to you or, good friends, something like that, or simply your family. It instead may address bad or misguided people: “You who have lived in close contact to the bad groups of Jinns”. You simply have to guess the real meaning. Clear language in the Quran?

576 6/128b: "- - - Jinns - - -". Supernatural beings only to be found in and around Arabia - an Arabism. See 4/13d above.

577 6/128ba: "- - - much (toll) did ye (Jinns*) take of men". All the same they are not mentioned in the Bible. As Israel was and is near the Arabs, jinns do exist in the periphery of old Jewish folklore (though spelled differently - djinnie if we remember correctly), but not in the Bible. Of some essence for Allah, totally non-interesting for Yahweh. Yahweh and Allah the same god?

578 6/128bb: “- - - we (humans*) reached our term (predestined day of death*), which Thou (Allah) didst appoint for us.” See 6/2d+e above.

579 6/128bc: "The Fire - - -". Hell.

###580 6/128c: "- - - you (sinners and non-Muslims*) will dwell therein (Hell*) for ever, except as Allah willeth." This may - may - be a very essential verse in the Quran. Together with in 11/107 and 10/12 plus some Hadiths this verse make many of the foremost Muslim scholars believe that perhaps Hell is not really forever - for eons, but perhaps not forever. Heaven yes, Hell perhaps no.

581 6/129: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". Normally one of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims - used to make distance between his followers and others, and to make his followers feel superior to others. This technique has been used by many leaders of groups - religious or others - throughout times.

582 6/130a: “O ye assembly of Jinns and men! Came there not unto you messengers from amongst you - - -?” Human messengers to man, Jinn messengers to Jinns. But it is contradicted by:

12/109: “Nor did We (Allah*) send before thee (Muhammad*) (as Messengers) any but men, whom We did inspire – (men) living in human habitations.” No Jinn messengers. Well, in this verse it is possible to explain it away with that it perhaps only is spoken about human habitats. That is not possible in the next two and the last one, because they are without (possible) reservations.

16/43: “And before thee (Muhammad*) also the Messengers we sent were but men - - -“.

21/7: “Before thee (Muhammad), also, the messengers we sent were but men - - .”

22/75: “Allah chooses Messengers from angles and from men - - -.” But not from Jinns.

25/20: “And the messengers whom We (Allah*) sent before thee (Muhammad) were all men...”

Well, 6/130 says that at least not all were men. A nice little contradiction.

(5 contradictions).

583 6/130b: “- - - My (Allah's*) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

584 6/130c: "- - - this Day of yours - - -". Here the Day of Doom.

585 6/130d: "- - - witness - - -". Why does an omniscient god need witnesses?

586 6/130e: "- - - Faith". = Islam.

587 6/131a: "- - - (Allah*) would not destroy for their wrongdoing men's habitations whilest their occupants were unwarned". How many times have f.x. natural catastrophes happened - also in Muslim areas - without any warnings?

588 6/131b: "- - - their wrongdoing - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. F.x. it is wrongdoing not to go to war to steal and enslave and kill when a leader has a jihad ("holy" war) declared, whereas f.x. to rape any captive female, even children, is "lawful and good" (if the female is not pregnant) - and the fact that this formally has to be done in the name of the god, makes both the deeds, the religion and the god even more distasteful, repulsive - and immoral.

589 6/132a: "To all (Muslims in the Quran's paradise*) are degrees (or ranks) according to their deeds - - -". It is many places in the Quran made clear that the Islamic paradise is a class society. (But it is nowhere explained how you can get all your family around you in the paradise, it they do not all merit the same level or class).

590 6/132b: "- - - thy (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah) is not mindful of anything that they (good Muslims*) do". Allah knows everything you do and reacts accordingly. Why, if he has predestined everything and humans just are "puppets on strings"? And there also is the problem of 2/233h above.

591 6/133a: "(Allah is*) Full of Mercy". See 1/1a.

592 6/133b: “- - - if it were His Will, He could destroy you - - -”. Well, he has not done so - able or not. One of the many places in the Quran where Muhammad boasts of what Allah is able to do - - - if he willed (but he never willed).

593 6/133c: "- - - even as He (Allah*) raised you (Arabs/Muslims*) up from the posterity of other people". There were ruins and there were traditions from and about earlier people in and around Arabia. Muhammad claimed they all were destroyed because of sins against Allah, and their lands and habitats given to the people living at his time, in the hope that they would do better.

594 6/134a: “All that hath been promised unto you (for better or worse*) will come to pass: nor can you frustrate it (in the least bit)”: Everything Allah has predestined for you, will happen. (A never answered question here is: Why then bother with praying to Allah, when everything is predestined, and nothing can change the predestinations?)

595 6/134b: "- - - nor can you frustrate it (Allah's predestination*) (in the least bit)". Nobody and nothing can change Allah's predestination and Plan - nothing and nobody at all. Then where is free will of man, and where is the rationale in praying?

596 6/134c: “All that hath been promised unto you (for better or worse*) will come to pass: nor can you frustrate it (in the least bit) - - -”. But is this about this life or the next? Most Muslim scholars think it refers to the next life, but some - f. ex. Zamakhshari - believe it is this life. As mentioned before, the Quran often is unclear - in spite of Muslims strong, but never proved (as normal) claims about the opposite.

597 6/134d: "- - - certain - - -". See 2/2b above.

598 6/135a: “- - - soon will ye (people*) know who it is whose end will be (best) in the Hereafter.” Muslims will fare best of course. One of the many pep-talks in the Quran.

599 6/135b: (A116 – in 2008 edition 118): “- - - soon will ye (people*) know who it is whose end will be (best) in the Hereafter.” Literal meaning: “- - - to whom the (happy) end of the abode (“dar”) shall belong”. This is the meaning if you guess that the word “dar” refers to “dar al-akhirah” = “the abode in the life to come”. But it only is said “dar”, and then it can as well refer to “dar ad-dunya” = “the abode in this life” - - - and in that case the sentence from the Quran indicates that you will have a rich and good future in this world. Pick your choice or guess. Allah is using clear and distinct words? At least 2 meanings. And these variants as usual also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word there has more than one meaning.

600 6/135c: "- - - the wrongdoers will not prosper". See 3/77b.

601 6/135d: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". One of Muhammad's negative and distaste inducing names for non-Muslims.

602 6/135e: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". Remember that also when used like names, in the Quran words like this is meant in accordance with the book's own partly immoral moral code.

*603 6/136a: “Out of what Allah hath produced in abundance in tilth and in cattle - - -”. One more a loose statement about what Allah does just hanging in the air for want of proof or documentation. As they have no proofs of any central claim, it is not strange that Islam glorifies blind belief without proofs, or tells that it is primitive not to be able to see from the texts in the Quran that it is from a god, in spite of all mistakes and invalid “signs” and “proofs” and lose statements - hallmarks of cheats and deceivers and manipulators of men - and as primitive to ask for proofs. Even though what really is primitive is to believe anything and everything without proofs - primitive and naïve. (In all other aspects of life, blind belief is the sure way to be cheated).

604 6/136b: "- - - they (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say - - - 'This is for Allah - - -(etc.*)'". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

605 6/136c: "- - - they (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say - - - 'This is for Allah - - -(etc.*)'". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

606 6/136d: "Evil (and unjust) - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

607 6/136e: "- - - for our (non-Muslims'*) "partners" - - -". Other gods than Allah.

608 6/137a: (A120 – in 2008 edition A122): “- - - their (the Pagans’*) partners made alluring - - -.” Literal translation (translated from Swedish): “- - - their (presumed) helpers/partners measured out for them - - -.” It is clear that for the early Muslims the “partners” according to f.x. Razi meant bad beings or forces. But what does it mean today for people who do not any longer believe in black magic and the corresponding beings? Like the Quran really did not tell the Muslims of that time what it actually meant with “partners”, it is as silent today – nobody really knows – everybody have to guess.

609 6/137b: "- - - the slaughter of their children - - -." Before Islam it happened that not wanted children (most often girls) were killed - often buried alive - and sometimes sacrificed to a god. This Muhammad put an end to - one of his good deeds. But beware that it did not happen often. Muslims have a tradition for telling this was more or less a norm, but modern science, INCLUDED Islamic scientist today agree that it did happen, but not often - Muslims overstated the story to paint "the others" more black.

610 6/137c: "If Allah had willed - - -". This or similar sentences abound in the Quran - - - but Allah never willed. You surely have heard children or immature persons boasting to impress someone - these sentences make us think about such cases. Also see 14/19d below.

611 6/137d: “If Allah had willed (he could have “saved” the pagans*)”. But Muhammad was able to “save” (make them Muslims) only some of them - and far from always by words. There still are some billions pagans and other non-Muslims in the world.

612 6/137e: "- - - but leave alone them (polytheists*) and their inventions." That was in peaceful 621 AD. It soon changed: This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran. (At least 28 abrogations).

613 6/138a: This verse is about some religious traditions and taboos from pre-Islamic Arabia.

614 6/138b: "- - - they (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say - - -". A time anomaly. See 4/13d above.

615 6/138c: "- - - they (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say that such and such crops are taboo (etc.*) - - -". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

616 6/138d: "- - - soon will He (Allah*) requite them (non-Muslims*) for their inventions". See 3/77b above.

617 6/139a: Some more about pre-Islamic traditions and taboos from Arabia. Also see 6/138a above.

618 6/139b: "They (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say - - -". A time anomaly. See 4/13d above.

619 6/139c: "They (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) say: 'What is in the wombs - - - (etc.*)'". See 138c above.

620 6/139d: "- - - He (Allah*) will soon punish them (non-Muslims*) - - -". See 3/77b above.

621 6/139e: "- - - He (Allah*) is full of wisdom and knowledge." Not if the Quran represents his wisdom and knowledge - too much in that book is wrong.

622 6/140a: "- - - those who slay their children - - -". See 6/137b above.

623 6/140b: "- - - inventing (lies) against Allah". Religious rules (in other religions) not in accordance with Muhammad's teachings, are "lies invented against Allah". It here is somewhat ironic that many customs and rules in Islam simply were taken over by Muhammad from the earlier Pagan Arab religion.

624 6/140c: "They (non-Muslims*) have indeed gone astray - - -". But who are horribly astray if the Quran is a made up book? - and it is not from any god with so many errors, etc.

625 6/140d: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2(2b above.

626 6/140e: "- - - heeded no guidance". With a reason, as the guidance in the Quran is doubtful with all its mistakes, etc. See 16/107 below.

627 6/141a: “It is He (Allah*) Who produceth gardens - - -”. Proofs? Documents? Also see 6/141b just below.

628 6/141b: “It is He (Allah’) Who produceth - - - tilth with produce of all kinds - - -”. Profs? Documents? Like so often the Quran takes natural phenomena and claim Allah has made it (see 11/7a below) - just as cheaply as any other religion can use just the same cheap words and cheap, unproved claims for their god(s). Cheats and deceivers often use such methods. Was Muhammad a cheat and deceiver?

629 6/141c: "But waste not by excess - - -". The Quran is against wasting your money and your fortune by excesses. In this way it is similar to Buddhism: Use "the Middle Way". Actually there is a slight chance that Muhammad got the idea about "the middle way" from Buddhism - as known hardly any of his ideas was his own, he "borrowed" more or less everything from others. The Arabs were traders and had business connections also with India, and at least later also with China. The idea of "the middle way" may have come from India where a large percent of the population were Buddhist (until Muslims later murdered them by the hundreds of thousands and ended Buddhism in India (= Pakistan, India and Bangladesh today) nearly completely, even though India was the origin of Buddhism. Islam's demonstrations of "let there be no compulsion in religion" were horrible and grotesque f.x. in Sind - now mainly Pakistan - but also in what is now India. Really worthy the claimed "Religion of Peace". To quote a wise man: "When someone says one thing, but acts differently, I believe in his acts, not in his words").

630 6/142a: "- - - what Allah hath provided for you - - -". Everything you have, is provided for you by Allah - and as normal for Muhammad; no proof - - - and an easy claim for any religion.

631 6/142b: "- - - and follow not in the footsteps of Satan - - -". Here the meaning is: To make restrictions on what Allah has permitted, is to follow Satan (f.x. restrictions on raping captive girls and women during and after a war claimed to be for Allah but which may give riches and power in this world - also for the leaders?).

But it is a curiosa here that Just Satan is one of the theories for who is the real maker of the Quran, as it is clear that a book of that quality is from no god. Some of the moral and judicial rules in the Quran and in Islam may back up that theory.

632 6/143a: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a below.

633 6/143b: "- - - truthful - - -". See 2/2b above.

634 6/143-144: "(Take) eight (head of cattle)in (four) pair: of sheep a pair, and of goats a pair, - - - Of camels a pair, and oxen (cows*) a pair." Other places tell that these were the cattle Allah created for humans. Any god had known there also at least were the water buffalo and the Indian elephant in the east, the reindeer in the north, and the lama and it’s at least 2 relatives in the Americas - cattle Muhammad did not know about. Then who made the Quran?

635 6/144a: "But who doth more wrong than one who invents a lie against Allah, to lead astray men without knowledge?" A most ironic sentence if the Quran is a made up book (and at least it is from no god - no god makes that many mistakes, contradictions, cases of invalid logic, etc.). But if Muhammad himself made up the religion, at least he knew he was safe - he in case knew there was no Allah to punish him.

636 6/144b: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a below.

637 6/144c: "For Allah guideth not people who do wrong". He guides absolutely no-one unless he exists - a strong probability as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is not from a god.

638 6/144d: "- - - guideth - - -". See 16/107 below.

639 6/145a: “I (Muhammad*) find not in the Message received by me - - -". Was it really received? - and in case from whom? As gods are impossible with all those mistakes, there are few alternatives: Dark forces/devil, illness like TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy), or a cold, scheming human mind. Or a combination of 2 or 3 of these.

640 6/145b: “I (Muhammad*) find not in the Message received by me by inspiration - - -". A method easy to claim - and easy to falsify.

641 6/145c: “I (Muhammad*) find not - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

642 6/145d: “I (Muhammad*) find not in the Message received by me by inspiration any (meat) forbidden to be eaten - - - unless it is dead meat, or blood poured forth, or the flesh of swine – for it is an abomination (nobody knows why it is prohibited*) – or - - - (meat) on which a name has been invoked, other than Allah’s”. This surah “appeared” ca. 621 AD. Some 6 years later Allah or Muhammad obviously discovered they had made a mistake and forgotten that also meat from donkey is forbidden for Muslims – this according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari). Then this verse was abrogated in order to add that kind of forbidden meat - to strengthen it simply. This is one of the cases where the Quran is abrogated by Hadith. (But note that if a Muslim is forced to eat these kinds of meat – f. ex. from sheer hunger – or is cheated to eat it – f.x. someone tells him wrongly that the sausage contains no pork and he trusts what is said - then it is no sin).

As for the taboo against the meat of pigs: The most popular theory is the dangers of trichinosis - a danger which any god, though, had known it is easy to guard yourself against. Another is the theory of the distaste factor - especially in hot climate pigs like wallowing in wet filth and mud to cool themselves down, which may look disgusting; "a dirty animal". A third is that some of the food a pig eat, also can be eaten by man, and pigs thus are expensive animals to keep - to save food in lean times leaders in forgotten times may have put this taboo on them to save food for their tribes. A forth is that in really old times the pig may have been a holy animal. But nobody knows the real reason - not even the Quran (a god had known and had been able to give a better reason than just claiming it is an abomination).

643 6/145e: "- - - blood poured forth - - -". This means blood running from the animal when it is killed. But there nowhere in the Quran is explained what is the difference between this blood and the blood remaining in the meat, etc. - it is exactly the same blood.

644 6/145f: "- - - (Allah*) is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful". See 1/1a above.

645 6/146a: “For those who followed the Jewish Law - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

646 6/146b: “For those who followed the Jewish Law, We (Allah*) forbade (to eat*) every (animal) with undivided hoof, and We forbade them the fat of the ox and the sheep - - -“. Skipping the fact that Allah and the god of the Jews, Yahweh, is not the same god – not unless he is schizophrenic – the correct is: - - - “the fat of cattle, sheep or goat” (3. Mos. 7/23). A minor mistake, but an omniscient god had not forgotten the goat.

647 6/146c: (Jews are prohibited from eating much of the fat from cows, sheep (and goat)*) "in recompense for their willful disobedience - - -". This claim is not from the Bible. There is absolutely no indication in the Bible for that this is the reason.

648 6/146d: "- - - True - - -". See 2/2b above.

649 6/147a: "If they accuse thee (Muhammad*) of falsehood, say: 'Your Lord (Allah*) is full of Mercy all-embracing; but from people in guilt never will His wrath be turned back.'" Muhammad never was able to prove even a comma about Allah or about his own connection to a god - even though it should have been easy for an omnipotent god to do so. He had to resort to fast words and explaining everything away. Here he uses a treats for waylaying the debate.

650 6/147b: "Your Lord (Allah*) is full of Mercy - - -". See 1/1a above and see if you agree.

651 6/147c: "- - - from people of guilt never will His (Allah's*) wrath be turned back". See 3/77b above.

652 6/148a: "Those (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) who give partners (to Allah) will say - - -". A historical anomaly - see 4/13d above.

653 6/148b: "Those (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) who give partners (to Allah) will say: "If Allah had wished - - - (etc.*)". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

654 6/148c: “If Allah had wished, we (people*) should not have (had other gods*) - - -” See 6/106 above. And: How can Allah punish people for believing in other gods, when that belief is in accordance with his own predestinations??!! - it is Allah who decides on beforehand anything after all, even your thoughts and acts, according to the Quran.

655 6/148d: "- - - partners (to Allah) - - -". See 25/18a below.

656 6/148e: "Say: 'Have ye any (certain) knowledge? If so, produce it before us." Islam and the Quran are quick to demand proofs from anyone else, but hardly ever prove anything themselves - they rely on unproved claims and on statements built on other unproved claims. Beware of this when you debate with Muslims: They often put forth loose claims without any proofs, and demands that you prove it is wrong - if you are unable to that, they claim they are right, no matter how wrong they are. And if you are able to prove a claim wrong, they utter disbelief and instead make another unproved claim. One technique is quoting a known writer speaking about things he knows no more about than ordinary people - but he is a known writer. By cherry-picking quotes Islam has found a number of "good" claims, and it is not always easy to prove they are wrong, even when they are far from reality. But it is not for you to prove him/her wrong. It is he/she who is making the claim, and thus it is for him/her to prove it. Demand proofs for all claims from them before you at all start answering them - mostly they are unable to prove anything when they are using dishonest arguments or loose claims, and loose claims are especially often used.

657 6/148f: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/18a below.

658 6/148g: "If so, produce it before us (Muhammad*)". In clear text: 'If you non-Muslims have knowledge opposing the Quran, prove it'. Muslims demand proofs from everybody else, but never prove any central claims they put forth themselves. This in spite of that it is the one who claims something who has the burden of proving his claim.

659 6/148h: "Ye (non-Muslims*) follow nothing but conjecture - - -". This may be right or wrong, but a relevant question here is: As the Quran with all its errors, etc. is not from a god - what is then Islam?

660 6/148i: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) do nothing but lie". This is a demonstration of 6/148c just above: Loose claim. But this also is a part of some ones - and not only Muslims' - method of debate: Scolding, etc. Just this accusation in the Quran is a bit ironic, though: The only of the reasonably big religions where dishonesty not only is an accepted, but advised part of religious debates, is Islam (but NB: Only if there is a reason for lying, or if it is necessary to win your point - - - but all the same: How reliable is a religion which relies on lies? - al Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), even broken words/promises/oaths.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

####661 6/149a: (A6/141 – in 2008 edition 6/143): “With Allah is the argument that reaches home (= the decisive arguments = it is Allah who decides*) - - - ". Predestination again - because Allah long since has decided everything according to his Plan. And man's claimed free will?

“The Message of the Quran” has this comment:

“In other words, the real relationship between Allah’s knowledge of the future (and, therefore, the ineluctably of what is to happen in the future) on one side, and man’s free will, on the other – two propositions which, on the face of it, seem to contradict one another – is beyond man’s comprehension; but since both are postulated by Allah, both must be true.

Simply the ultimate pinnacle of clear speech. And the ultimate victory not for blind faith, but for blind faith based on naivety and intellectual unconsciousness.

IT ALSO IS THE ULTIMATE DEFEAT FOR THE CLAIM THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO COMBINE THE CLAIM THAT MAN HAS FREE WILL WITH THE CLAIM THAT ALLAH DECIDES EVERY DETAIL OF YOUR LIFE.

Predestination contra man’s free will actually is a version of “the Time Travel Paradox”, which is long since proved unsolvable. (In short: The king is murdered. A FTL-message (FTL = Faster Than Light) is sent to a star-ship off Sirius. FTL according to Einstein moves backwards in time, and arrives earlier than it was sent. The ship sends a warning to the king, and as it uses FTL, the warning arrives before the murder and the king avoids the murderer. Because of that no message is sent to the ship, which sends no warning to the king - and the king is murdered. The a FTL message is sent to the ship - - - -".) There is no way Allah can even be fully clairvoyant, not to mention decide everything on beforehand, and man at the same time have free will. (More in the chapter about predestination.)

Another proof for that there are things in the non-material parts of life which are impossible even for an omnipotent and omniscient god: Add one mathematical 1 to another mathematical 1. The only possible answer even for a god is the mathematical 2. There simply are things not possible even for gods. And to combine full predestination with even a tiny part of free will for man, is one of them - the laws of chaos inexorably prohibits it. A god may direkt this and that to happen, but full predstination or full precognition is not possible if it is possible for man to change his mind, even if he can change it only now and then.

PREDESTINATION ALSO MAKES PRAYERS MEANINGLESS: IF ALLAH HAS PREDESTINED EVERYTHING, PRAYERS CAN CHANGE EXACTLY NOTHING.

This point perhaps is the pinnacle in all Islam's ability to flee even from facts they see themselves, its inability to face hard facts even when they see them, and its ability and willingness to be blind and to overlook even the strongest facts and proofs for that things are very wrong in the Quran and thus with Muhammad and in Islam. Central claims which cannot be true, are accepted in pure superstition.

"Our fathers told us and our neighbors and mullahs tell us this is true, and then it must be true".

"We built our lives on this belief - it has to be true because it is too difficult for me to face the alternative".

You meet this lack of moral backbone and the ability in Islam and in Muslims to overlook or explain away even the strongest facts, at every point in the Quran where there are mistakes, contradictions or other proofs for that something is wrong in the Quran, and thus with Muhammad and with his religion - proofs they are unable to face for that Islam as told in the Quran is not a religion, but a superstition.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

662 6/149b: "- - -if it had been His Will - - -”. One more sample of Muhammad's telling about what Allah could do if he only would - - - but he never would or will. Bluff? Also see 14/19d below.

663 6/149c: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

664 6/149d: "- - -if it had been His Will He could indeed have guided you”. A guide using the Quran with all its errors as a guide-book is not much of a guide.

665 6/149e: "- - - guided - - -". See 16/107 below.

666 6/150a: "Bring forward your witnesses - - -". See 6/148e above.

667 6/150b: "- - - such (persons*) as treat our (Allah's*) Signs as falsehood - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

668 6/150c: "- - - such (persons*) as believe not in the Hereafter - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

669 6/150d: "- - - our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". There exists nowhere - absolutely nowhere - signs which indicate or prove Allah; absolutely without exception they just are claims which as easily and cheaply can be used by any believer in any religion on behalf of his god(s) - totally invalid as proofs. The only possible exception is the signs "borrowed" from the Bible, but they in case prove Yahweh, not Allah.

670 6/150e: "- - - Our (Allah's*) Signs as falsehoods - - -". The claimed signs mostly in themselves are ok - they normally are real, existing natural phenomena. What are falsehoods is to treat them as signs - read "proofs" - for a god, without first proving that it is that god who causes those phenomena. Without such proofs first, the claim is totally without logic and value. And who is it who has to rely on fast-talk and made up claims? - the cheater, the deceiver, the swindler.

671 6/150f: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) hold others (other gods*) equal to their Guardian Lord (Allah*)". See 25/18a below.

672 6/150g: "- - - their Guardian-Lord (Allah*) - - -". Only if he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran in addition has described him correctly.

###673 6/151a: “Come, I (Muhammad*) will rehearse what Allah hath (really) prohibited you from - - - (f.x.*) be good to your parents”. This very obviously is wrong and a bit of a contradiction compared to other places in the Quran – Muhammad very obviously meant exactly the opposite; that you were ordered to be god to your parents. An omniscient god would not make such a mistake. Who made the Quran? PS: This is one of the verses Muslim scholars (but not always imams or laymen) admits must be wrong - - - and omniscient gods do not make mistakes.

Also practically all Muslim scholars as mentioned agree that here the text is wrong – there is said there are 19 such ones, www.1000mistakes.com lists 15 it is absolutely contrary to what the Quran says about this all other places. Which give you an unbeatable proof against any Muslim boasting that the book being without any mistakes at all. A proof and a fact sanctioned by Islam! (And besides: If here is one mistake, how many more are there?) Just remember: 6/151 (6 in Scandinavian = sex, and 151 has sex in both ends (1 + 5 = 6, and 5 + 1 = 6). Easy to remember.

And besides: If here is a mistake and if Islam admits 15 - or perhaps more (we have heard 19) - how many more are there in reality?

Surah 6 is a bit hard upon the wishful thinking of Muslims:

- In 6/50 Muhammad confirms he cannot see what is hidden - the future - killing all the claimed miracles claimed made by Muhammad concerning seeing what was hidden, and indirectly also documenting he was no prophet - not knowing the future = unable to make prophesies, and a person unable to make prophesies is no prophet. (F. ex. 5. Mos. 18/21 - in the same speech of Moses where Islam claims Moses foresees Muhammad when talking about "a prophet like me" - quite an irony when 18/21 indirectly, but clearly tells Muhammad was not even a prophet - he only "borrowed that impressive and imposing title. (And among many others 18/2 tells Moses was speaking about Jewish "brothers" - Islam has cherry-picked and twisted 18/15 and 18/18 in an al-Taqiyya.)

Also connected to 6/50;(A.6/39): "This denial on the part of the Prophet (Muhammad*) of any claim to supernatural power - - -". This states that Islam admits Muhammad had no supernatural power at all = absolutely no prophet.

Then 6/91c: "Who then sent down the Book which Moses brought?" This is intended as a rhetoric question with only one possible answer: The god. But as Moses did not get any book(s) both according to the Bible and according to science, this try to make up a "proof" for that Allah might have sent down the Quran, was a total miss. Any god had known this and not made such a flop. Then who made the Quran?

In connection with 6/106 (6/106b) Allah's very existence is doubted.

In connection with 6/108 "The Message of the Quran" (comment6/93) explains "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been implanted in him from childhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible ones" - which explains in details why Muslims believe in spite of all facts proving something is seriously wrong with the religion.

In connection with 6/149 (comment 6/141 in the same book) Islam has to admit that the claim that Allah decides everything - predestination - is impossible to combine with the claimed free will for man (and without free will it is morally wrong to punish man for sins) - but "it all the same must be true, because Allah says so (in the Quran*)" the ultimate defeat for brain against blind belief.

And in 6/151 may be the most well-known of the mistakes in the Quran accepted by Islam to be a mistake: "You are prohibited from - - - being good to your parents" (well, may be "Mary, sister of Aaron" is even more well-known, but that one is frequently tried explained away).

674 6/151b: This also is a really strange contradiction: “Come, I (Muhammad*) will rehearse what Allah hath (really) prohibited you from – - (to*) - - kill not your children on a plea of want (poverty*) - - -.” Read it once more: You are prohibited from not to kill your children if you are poor!! – also this (see 6/151a just above) is the opposite of what is said everywhere in the book. The Muslim sources we have found, agree on that also this is wrong – and actually we agree with them – this is so far out of the Quran’s normal points of view concerning children, that it must have been an accident.

But this means that here you have another clear mistake in the Quran – certified by Islam as a mistake – to serve for free to any Muslim or non-Muslim claiming that the book is perfect and without mistakes “to the last comma”. Just ask them if they have ever read 6/151? (And ask if they are aware of that the comma did not exist in Arab when the Quran was written around 650 AD).

And: When this is wrong – how much more is wrong in the book? Also see 6/151a just above.

675 6/151c: “- - - kill not your children - - -.” In pre-Islamic times in Arabia it happened that parents killed their baby (mostly) daughters (often by burying them alive), and sometimes also sacrificed a baby to a god. This Muhammad put an end to. But to be fair both ways: Muslims often pretends that this was a normal thing to do by the Pagans, and that Islam thus has saved huge numbers of girls and some boys through the centuries. Realities – realities admitted also by modern Muslim scholars - are that it only happened infrequently, and perhaps in connection with ceremonies mainly. (All the same it is a plus that he put an end to it).

676 6/151d: "Come not nigh to shameful deeds - - -". Quite an ironic sentence when you remember the shameful deeds the Quran advices or accepts - sex with children (at least from 9 years), rape, slavery, lying, stealing (in connection with raids and wars), suppression, murder, just to mention some.

677 6/151e: "- - - take not life's - - - except by the way of justice (f.x. by killing non-Muslims*) and law (which sometimes fails*) - - -". Contradiction to the Bible: "You shall not kill". Period! Can the two gods be the same?

678 6/151f: "- - - take not life's - - - except by the way of justice and law - - -". This ought to be a thought provoker for terrorists and even more self-murder terrorists: With indiscriminate killing most of the victims will be innocent persons, or at least persons who would not be given a death penalty by the law in a proper court. By killing them you sin against this verse in the Quran.

And another fact: Islam states that the murderer has to carry the victims' loads of sins, because they did not get the chance to repent and ask Allah to be forgiven. Add this to the fact that a self-murder terrorist is not killed in the cause of Allah, but kills himself, something which is forbidden in Islam - how big is the chance for that such a person will end in Paradise?

679 6/151g: "- - - wisdom". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it mostly is connected to knowledge about his religion, Islam.

680 6/152a: “And come not nigh to an orphan’s property, except to improve it - - -.” Muhammad did his best to protect orphans – one of the (too few) pluses for him.

681 6/152b: "- - - no burden do We (Allah*) place on any soul, but that which it can bear." Wrong. There are suicides, there are persons fleeing from their families and/or surroundings, there are mental break-downs also in Muslim societies. Many of these are because life is too tough.

682 6/152c: "Whenever ye (Muslims*) speak, speak justly - - -", - - - except when it is better to use al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth - or may be more exact; making mental reservations against what you say), or when it simply is better to break your word or even your oath to gain a better result. Islam and the Quran has some special rules for speaking the truth - rules you find in no other of the big religions, and rules one has to beware of, as you never can be sure that a Muslim really is speaking the truth. (A problem also for Muslims: If he really is speaking the truth and others do not believe him, he has no way of strengthening his words.)

683 6/152d: "- - - the Covenant of Allah - - -". Once upon a time some Boers of South Africa made a covenant with Yahweh. They promised so-and-so, and Yahweh should do such-and-such. But they forgot to check if Yahweh agreed to be part of that covenant.

Is this claim part of a similar "covenant"? - if Allah at all exists.

684 6/152e: "- - - thus doth He (Allah*) command you - - -". As the Quran is not from a god, the relevant question is: Allah or someone/something else?

685 6/153a: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

686 6/153b: "Verily, this is My (Allah's*) Way - - -". Is it? - when the Quran clearly is not from a god?

687 6/153c: "- - - His (Allah's*) (great) Path - - -". If he exists. If he is the god behind the Quran (and there is no god behind a book that full of errors, etc.). And if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

688 6/153d: "- - - thus doth He (Allah*) command you - - -". As the Quran is not from a god, the relevant question is: Allah or someone/something else?

689 6/153e: "- - - thus doth He (Allah*) command you, that you may be righteous". Is it righteous ("just and good") to steal or rob in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to enslave in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to extort in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to attack peaceful people in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to rape captive or slave women in the name of Allah? - is it righteous ("just and good") to rape captive or slave children in the name of Allah? - is it righteous to punish a raped woman because she cannot produce 4 men - men - who have seen the very act, to prove it was a rape? (one of the most disgusting and unjust laws in this complete world)! - is it righteous ("just and good") to lie, or cheat or break your word or your oath (al-Taqiyya, Kitman, "break your oath if that gives a better result" (Muhammad))? - is it righteous ("just and good") to murder opponents because they do not agree with you? - is it righteous ("just and good") to kill persons because they do not believe in Islam or wants to leave it - a religion based on a book full of mistakes, contradictions, wrong logic, etc., dictated by a man believing in al-Taqiyya, in Kitman, and in breaking his words and his oats even - is it "lawful and good"? The horrible truth is that many Muslims will answer "yes" to some or all of these questions. These rules of moral and justice - or rather immoral and injustice - have been so strongly imprinted on them since they were babies, that they are unable to see the horror and the places of inhuman injustice in their code of so-called moral - and moral philosophy which could have mended the terrible cultural rules does not exist in Islam - and the as disgusting injustice in some of their laws. They really believe those are the best of rules, and that everybody not living by them are second rate "Untermench" - In parts of Pakistan imams/mullahs have debated if non-Muslims have half the value or less compared to Muslims. No Comments. But also see 6/108d above and 23/24b (A23/11) and 26/74c below.

690 6/153f: "- - - righteous - - -". Remember that Words like "righteous" the Quran uses in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

691 6/154a: “We (Allah*) gave Moses the Book, - - -”. As said some times before: The 5 books of Moses – also called “the Book of Moses” - (or the Torah) - were written 400-700 (500-800?) years later according to science. Moses only got the 10 Commandments in writing. That is to say: He also got “the Law” – which later became part of “the Book of Moses”- but only verbally, and then wrote it down himself later according to the Bible (what he wrote down sometimes is called "The Book of Covenant" - f.x. 2. Mos. 24/7). But the law for one thing is just part of the book, and for another: Science as said all the same means the full book is written centuries later. And NB: According to the Bible, he got the Commandments and the law from Yahweh, not from Allah - and the teachings of Jesus and of Muhammad are far too different; it is impossible they represented the same god or the same line of prophethood (in addition to that Muhammad was no real prophet - he was unable to make prophesies or "to see the unseen"). And we remind you: Science have long since proved beyond any reasonable or unreasonable doubt that Muhammad's never documented claims that the Bible is falsified, are wrong. Islam has proved the same even stronger by not finding one single clear case of falsifications in all the tens of thousands relevant old manuscripts or fragments.

692 6/154b: "- - - do right - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

*693 6/154c: “- - - is explaining all things in detail”. It is explaining far from all things, and definitely not in details - among other facts there are not enough laws to run a society. Laws and rules had to be added.

694 6/155a: “And this is a Book (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) have revealed - - -”. Revealed? And with that many mistakes - is it really made by a god? No to both - at least no god was involved.

695 6/155b: “- - - a Book (the Quran*) which we (Allah*) have revealed as a blessing”. A book with many mistakes and invalid and even wrong proofs is no blessing - and is a book with many mistakes and much incitement to hate and war and suppression of other people and of women, a blessing? No.

696 6/155c: "- - - follow it (the Quran*) and be righteous - - -." See 6/153e above and weep.

697 6/155d: "- - - receive mercy - - -". Please read the surahs from Medina - omit the glossy words and read the reality; the demands, the orders, the imposed rules, the deeds. Is Allah able to show mercy? - - - if he at all exists.

*698 6/156a: “The Book (here the Bible, but see 6/156b just below*) was sent down to two Peoples before us (Mohammad and/or the Arabs*)”. Wrong. The OT was for one people primarily - the Jews - and it was mainly written, not sent down (only the 10 Commandments were sent down physically). The NT was written - not sent down - for many people, not only for one or two. Chapters/letters are even addressed to very different people. Besides there were other religions with books – f.x. in Persia. Or to see it another way – like “The Message of the Quran” explains it: The Bible was sent down to the Jews and the Christians “the only ones that according to what the Arabs knew had scriptures based on revelations from a god”. The interesting part of this explanation is the reason Islam gives for the mistake: That reason was that the Arabs – Muhammad - only knew about the book(s) of the Christians and the Jews. What the Arabs knew around 621 AD when Muhammad dictated this surah, should be totally irrelevant for an omniscient god when he made (?) the Quran many eons earlier like Muhammad claimed – a "Mother Book" which Allah and his angels revered in his own heaven, now with one more mistake. Then who made the Quran?

*699 6/156b: “The Book was sent down to two Peoples before us (Mohammad and/or the Arabs*)”. "The Book" in singular. This in spite of that according to verse 6/155 it is clear that Muhammad speaks about the Quran. The clear message or claim is: It is the same book originally, but then the copies the Jews and the Christians received were falsified until it became the Bible. (But both science and Islam have thoroughly proved this claim is wrong, by being unable to prove any falsification among the some 300 copies or fragments of the Gospels, the some 12ooo copies or fragments of Biblical texts, and some 32ooo other manuscripts with quotes from the Bible - all older than 610 AD (= before there was any reason for Jews and Christians to falsify the Bible to omit texts about Muhammad.))

700 6/156c: "- - - two Peoples - - -". Jews and Christians.

701 6/157a: "Or lest ye (contemporaries of Muhammad* should say - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

702 6/157b: "Or lest ye (contemporaries of Muhammad* should say - - -". ne more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

703 6/157c "- - - its (the Quran's*) guidance - - -". See 16/107 below.

704 6/157d: “- - - a Clear (Sign) - - -“. There are no clear signs/proofs neither for Allah nor for Muhammad’s connection to a god in the Quran or anywhere else. See 2/39b and 2/99 above.

705 6/157e: "- - - a Clear (Sign) (in this case the Quran*) from your Lord (Allah*) - - -". No god ever sent down a book with that many errors, etc.

706 6/157f: (the Quran is) "a guide - - -". Wrong. No book with that many mistakes etc., is any reliable guide.

707 6/157g: (the Quran is) "a mercy - - -". Wrong. Read the surahs from Medina and you will find that the only persons on this Earth to whom the Quran was a mercy, were the Muslims who became rich in wealth and women, and the ones of them who in addition gained power. Well, likely there also were some who found strength in the religion, but strength strong believers find in their religion, no matter which one it is - no war religion is necessary for that.

708 6/157h: "- - - who could do more wrong than one who rejected Allah's signs - - -". A pretty ironic sentence if the Quran is a made up book - and with all those errors it at least is not from any god.

709 6/157i: “- - - Allah's Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

710 6/157j: "- - - Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -". Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

711 6/157k: "- - - a dreadful penalty - - -". See 3/77b above.

712 6/158a: “- - - Signs of thy Lord (Allah*) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

713 6/158b: “- - - Signs of thy Lord (Allah*) - - -.” It tells something that Muhammad used and used and used "signs" - read; claimed "proofs" - any god would know were logically invalid. (Actually any human knowing something about logical deduction knows the same.) Also see 2/39b above.

714 6/158c: “The day that certain of the Signs of thy Lord (Allah*) do come - - -.” = The Day of Doom.

715 6/158d: "- - - righteousness - - -". Remember that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

716 6/158e: "- - - Faith". = Islam. Only Islam is faith according to the Quran - not "right faith" like many religions claim about their own religion, but plainly "faith"./p>

717 6/158f: “Wait ye (“infidels”*): we (Muhammad*) too are waiting.” Yes, in 621 AD when this surah was released, Muhammad still had not enough military strength – then the slogan still was to take things easy. This changed later. This verse is contradicted and often “killed” abrogated - by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 29 contradictions).

718 6/159a: "And for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah - - -." That this was an affair for Allah is very strongly contradicted by reality - through the Islamic history many a sect has been persecuted, some even drowned in blood. Also contradicted and abrogated by the Quran itself: This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256 in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (At least 28 abrogations).

719 6/159b: "He (Allah*) will in the end tell them (the not good Muslims and others*) the truth of all that they did". But if Allah knows the truth about everything, why then does he have to test people, f.x. by sending them to war for Muhammad and later leaders? Also see 2/233h above.

720 6/159b: "- - - the truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

721 6/160a: "He that doeth good, shall have ten times as much to his credit - - -." Islam is a religion where it is easy to deserve Paradise - in addition to all other easy ways, you have this. Similar is mentioned a few times in the book.

722 6/160b: "He that doeth good, shall have ten times as much to his credit - - -." This is not to be found in the Bible - it is such an essential point that it should have been if Yahweh was just another name for Allah, like the Quran claims - as normal without the slightest documentation.

723 6/160c: "- - - doeth good - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expression like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

724 6/160d: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expression like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

725 6/161a: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

726 6/161b: "Verily, my (a Muslim*) Lord (Allah*) hath guided me to a Way that is straight - - -". May be, but not by means of a book with so many errors, and at too many points immoral moral code like the Quran. Also see 16/107 below.

727 6/161c: "- - - a Way that is straight - - -". = The claimed road to Allah and to the Quran's paradise. See 10(9f below.

728 6/161d: "- - - a Way that is straight - - -". One of the differences between the Quran and the Bible. In the Quran it is the easy road which leads to paradise, in the Bible the difficult one ("the narrow road"). The Quran here smells of populism. Populism normally is popular, especially among the little thinking part of a population.

729 6/161e: "- - - (Islam is*) a religion of right - - -." No comment except: Study the moral code of the Quran and laugh at this statement, but weep at the reality.

730 6/161f: "- - - right - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

731 6/161g: "- - - the Path of Abraham (Islam*) - - -". One thing is that the Bible disagrees and talks about connection to Yahweh, not to Allah. Another thing is that the Quran never documents any connection to Abraham - there only are claims. And a third is that nearly nothing of the central claims in the Quran agrees with what the only other source about Abraham, the Bible, tells.

732 6/161h: "- - - Abraham - - -". A historical anomaly. See 4/13d above.

733 6/161i: "- - - Faith - - -". = Islam. According to the Quran Abraham and all other good persons i the Bible were good Muslims- as always without any documentation. It should not be necessary to mention that the Bible - and science - disagree.

734 6/161j: "- - - he (Abraham*) (certainly) joined not gods with Allah". Very naturally if the Bible is correct when it tells that Abraham believed in Yahweh and was not involved with Allah at all.

735 6/161k: "- - - he (Abraham*) (certainly) joined not gods with Allah". One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

736 6/162a: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

737 6/162b: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds - - -". This and similar are often claimed, but never proved - - - and often claimed on behalf of many claimed gods.

738 6/162c: "- - - Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds (plural and wrong*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible which tells this is Yahweh's job. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

739 6/162d: “- - - Worlds - - -“. See 65/12 below.

740 6/163a: “No partner hath He (Allah*): - - -”. If the Quran here means Allah, it may be correct. If it is indicating Yahweh, words of Jesus may easily be understood like the Quran here is wrong (not to use stronger words). Also see 6/101d above.

##741 6/163b: “- - - I (Muhammad*) am the first of those who bow to His (Allah’s*) will.“ How is that possible if the Quran is correct and lots of people had been Muslims before him, and bowed to Allah? (Though in reality it is highly likely he was right: That he was the first one ever). Similar claim f. ex. in 6/14. Some Muslims explains that it is meant the first in a special land or something, but that is not what the Quran says.

742 6/164a: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Cherisher of all things - - -". See 6/162b+c above.

743 6/164b: "- - - no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another". Well, at least concerning this life , the Bible says: "Bear each other’s burdens".

744 6/164c: "Your goal in the end is towards Allah". Only if he exists and is correctly described in the Quran

745 6/164d: "Your goal in the end is towards Allah". Contradicted by the Bible, which says it is towards Yahweh. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

746 6/164e: "- - - the truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

747 6/165a: "It is He (Allah*) who hath made you (Muslims*) (His) agents - - -". One more never proved claim. And one which among other things depends on if he really exists, if he really is a central god - or a god at all - and on if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth about this.

748 6/165b: "He (Allah*) hath raised you in ranks, some above others - - -". This is the Quran's explanation for differences and also for injustices in the world: Allah in his unfathomable wisdom has decided it like that."

749 6/165c: "- - - that He (Allah*) may try you (Muslims or people*) - - -". The never answered question: WHY does an omniscient and predestining god who according to the Quran knows every detail and innermost secrets about everybody, have to try anyone?!

750 6/165d: "- - - thy (people's/Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) is quick in punishment - - -". See 3/77b above.

751 6/165e: "- - - He (Allah*) is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful". See 1/1a above.

Surah 6: Sub-total = 751 + 1 + 4147 = 4899 comments.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

#####219a 8/69a-d: "- - - lawful and good - - -". If these words and the context it is taken from ("- - - enjoy what (loot, slaves, and women* + destruction and murder) ye took in war (normally of aggression*), lawful and good - - -"), were all you knew about the Quran and Islam, this alone would be enough to remove it from the civilized world and transfer it to the dark, harsh, and inhuman Medieval ages or earlier. This even more so as this is not "abrogated" by today's Islam, but on the contrary preached and even practiced (during armed conflicts) today in some Islamic fora and groups.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For the mistakes also see "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran" ( http://www.1000mistakes.com ), and for Jihad: "1000+ points on Jihad and on the greed, lust, distaste-mongering, apartheid-mongering, hate-mongering and war-mongering used building up to Jihad in the Quran and in Hadiths" ( http://www.1000mistakes.com/jihad-holywar/index.php ). And for tit-bits from this page see http://www.1000quran-comments.com .

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

NB: If you find any mistakes anywhere, please inform us. If it is a real mistake, it will be corrected. Please also inform us if we have overlooked points or errors.

If you spread our address, more people will get this information. On debate pages remember to repeat it now and then - if not it "drifts" out of view. http://www.1000mistakes.com and http://www.1000quran-comments.com .

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

#####8/69a-d: "- - - lawful and good - - -". If these words and the context they are taken from ("- - - enjoy what (loot, slaves, and women* + destruction and murder) ye took in war (normally of aggression*), lawful and good - - -") were all you knew about the Quran and Islam, this alone would be enough to remove them from the civilized world, and transfer it to the dark, harsh, and inhuman Medieval ages or earlier. This even more so as this is not "abrogated" (made invalid) by today's Islam, but on the contrary are preached many places all over even today in some Islamic fora and groups and countries. (And even practiced during armed conflicts - Bangladesh, East Timor, East Africa, and Indonesia a "short" time ago. Low intensity active in f.x. Indonesian New Guinea and parts of Africa even now (2010).)

Just remember that most Muslims are ok. Only a minority is militant - 1-2% according to Muslims (but 2% of 1.2 billion = 24 million). Then according to international science some 30% (= some 360 million) are willing to help the militants actively or with money, or at least "understand" them. The rest - the majority - are ok. (But our problem is to know who is who.)

But what is absolutely sure, is that apologists telling that "there are verses in the Quran which can be misused by terrorists", are talking nonsense. According to the Quran it is very clear it is the peaceful Muslims who are not good Muslims, and the activists who are laudable and obeying Muhammad and Allah.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

10/32: "- - - apart from the Truth, what (remains) but error?"

(A6/92 - English 2008 edition A6/93): "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been implanted in him(!) from his childhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible one - - -". This goes for Muslims more than for any other, because the imprinting is much stronger.

From 6/149a: "You meet this lack of moral backbone and the ability in Islam and in Muslims to overlook or explain away even the strongest facts, at every point in the Quran where there are mistakes, contradictions or other proofs for that something is wrong in the Quran, and thus with Muhammad and with his religion - proofs they are unable to face for that Islam as told in the Quran is not a religion, but a superstition".

"Religious 'knowledge' nearly always in reality only is belief - often strong belief, but only belief". (In Islam exactly nothing of any consequence is proved - on the contrary: Much is proved wrong and thus that it is from no omniscient god.)

A world dominated by Islam is quite possible - Islam is expanding. Will it end up like North Pakistan or Afghanistan or like Saudi Arabia without oil - or somewhere in between? - and this because of a religion which itself proves that something is seriously wrong with its teaching, and also that there is no god behind its "holy" book (no omniscient god makes mistakes), and thus not behind the religion.

A nice future for our grandchildren?


>>> Go to Next Surah

>>> Go to Previous Sura

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".