1000+ Comments on the Quran: Surah 45 -- AL-JATHIYAH (The Kneeling Down)

Revelation: Mecca, 616 - 620 AD.

(See general comments on Surahs here: Introduction)


 

The quotes and comments

001 "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captured - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 45/1: "Ha Mim". This is one of the many surahs which start with - in this case two - Arab letters the meaning of which no-one understands. (In some cases the letters make a word by design or co-incidence, but the word in those cases has no meaning relevant for that surah.) They are called abbreviated letters, and no-one knows why they are placed there. Clear language in the Quran?

003 45/2a: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) - - -.” Was it really revealed? - in case from whom? There never were any proofs for anything. So many things are wrong with the Quran, that it has to be proved it really was revealed.

004 45/2b: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) is from Allah - - -”. No omniscient god ever was involved in a book of a quality like the Quran - too much is wrong. See 13/1j and 40/75.

005 45/2c: "- - - Allah the Exalted in Power - - -". If he is, he at least never clearly has shown it. Never.

006 45/2d: “(Allah is) Full of Wisdom.” For words related to knowledge, see 26/83a above.

007 45/3a: "Verily - - -". In a book with so many mistakes, etc. words like "verily" and similar cannot be accepted at face value unless there are additional proofs.

008 45/3b: “Verily, in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth are signs for those who believe”. Yes, there are lots of signs - but not one single sign indicating, not to mention proving Allah, unless it is first proved that it really is Allah who is behind the “signs”. Not one single. Yes, even the number of heavens (plural) here is wrong.

009 45/3c: "- - - signs for those who believe”. A religious parallel to 26/83a above.

010 45/3d: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

011 45/3e: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

012 45/3f: "- - - those who believe". Muslims.

013 45/4a: "And in the creation of yourself, and the fact that animals are scattered (throughout the earth), are signs for those of assured Faith". But the claimed signs in case have no relevance to Allah unless it first is proved that it really is caused by Allah. As it is, any believer in any religion can do just the same as Muhammad: Claim it for glorification and indication of his god - totally free of charge, but also totally without real value as indication or proof, as long as it is not proved the god really causes it. After all "a proof is one or more proved facts which can give only one conclusion".

014 45/4b: "- - - creation - - -". There often are claims in the Quran about Allah creating thing and living being, but there never is anything but words, and words are cheap. The situation is extra interesting because if either the Bible or the Quran tells the truth on this point, Yahweh on the other hand, proved his power here.

015 45/4c: "- - - Signs for those of assured Faith". Probably - but not for anyone who is not blinded by belief and not looking for the truth, but for confirmation of what they wish to believe. For anyone with a minimum of knowledge and a minimum of training in seeing realities - also called critical thinking - there is not one valid sign for Allah (Quran-speak for proof for Allah) neither in the Quran, nor anywhere else.

016 45/4d: "- - - those of assured Faith". Muslims. Only Muslims have faith according to the Quran.

017 45/4e: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

018 45/4f: "- - - Faith". Islam.

**019 45/5a: “And the alternation of the Night and Day - - - are Signs for those who are wise”. Not unless Islam proves it is Allah who alternates night and day. They may say that Allah made the physical laws - but then they will have to prove this - - - “strong claims demand strong proofs and words are cheap”. And of course they will have to compete with all other religions trying to say and do the same, with the same cheap words. Words are cheap as long as you do not have to prove them - and very little in the Quran is proved.

***In Islam the educated ones in reality knows nothing is proved (for humans to prove a god is impossible - only a god can do that, and Allah never proved anything, and Muhammad only gave fast-talk, in spite of serious requests). The defence is that “any intelligent person can see from the texts in the Quran that they have to be sent down by an omniscient god” (!!). For one thing such claims are mumbo-jumbo, and for another all the mistakes and all the invalid “proofs” etc. disapprove this. The second line of defence is that it is “primitive” thinking to have to rely on proofs!!! (F. ex. in “The Message of the Quran” that on top of all is “certified” by a top university - Al-Ahzar in Cairo). The reality is the 180-degree opposite: It is primitive - and naïve - thinking to accept so - and so often - loose claims and often obviously wrong and unlikely statements without some sorts of proofs. Also see 11/7a above.

020 45/5b: “- - - the fact that Allah sends down Sustenance from the sky - - -.” As “always” the Quran makes a claim only, and proves nothing. As long as it is not proved, it is not a fact – words are too cheap. Actually this is one of the very many cases where the Quran takes a natural a phenomenon – here rain – and unceremoniously say it is "a fact" that it is Allah who makes it - - - just like any priest in any religion can say about his god or gods, just as cheaply.

***021 45/5c: “- - - the fact that Allah sends down Sustenance from the sky - - -.” This is one of the lies in the Quran. Not the claim that Allah sends down rain - in this connection that may be said to be may be or may be not true , or a guess. But that it is a fact. Until it is proved it is done by Allah, it is no fact.

**022 45/5d: “- - - and the fact that Allah sends down Sustenance (rain?*) - - - are Signs for those who are wise.“ The only sign this sentence is for those who are wise IS THAT SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG, AS IT NOWHERE - NOWHERE - IN OR OUT OF THE QURAN IS ESTABLISHED AS A FACT THAT ALLAH SENDS DOWN ANY SUSTENANCE OR RAIN!!!! There are lots of lose statements and claims but not one single proof - even though the slogan “tell a lie often enough, and people will believe it” carries merit, it still does not make words taken from thin air a fact. On the contrary: Use of loose words, invalid statements, invalid “signs” or “proofs”, not to mention false and made up “facts” all are hallmarks for cheats, swindlers and deceivers - an honest, omniscient god would never let his teachings rest on such arguments.

Who made the Quran - an honest god or someone else? Do not forget the Devil in disguise - if there is a real and true religion somewhere that is not Islam, a teaching like this would be a sweet dream for a devil wanting to keep as many as possible away from that religion, and especially using such a bloody and brutal substitute. (The teachings of Muhammad after he landed in Medina, makes this alternative possible).

#####023 45/5e: "- - - the fact - - -". Beware that the Quran - and Muslims and Islam - often are very free and liberal when using words like "fact", "proof", etc. Always check it the claims really are fact or proofs, etc. before you believe in such words from Muslim/Islamic sources. And do not judge a Muslim if you find out he is lying about this or that, and especially not concerning the religion. Remember that in Islam it often is not a sin to lie - yes, when it comes to defending or promoting the religion, it even is advices to do so "if necessary". Cfr. "Al-Taqiyya" (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), "war is deceit" (and "everything" is war), and the rules for breaking even words/promises/oaths in the Quran (f.x. 2/225a, 5/89a+b, 16/91d, 16/92a+b, and 66/2a). All this are moral "specialties" you do not find in normal religions - not to mention in the Bible or NT. But then the moral code in the Quran is a bit "special" on too many points.

024 45/5f: “(Allah*) revives thereafter the earth after its death (by sending rain*) - - -”. One thing is that the Quran in no way proves that it is Allah who sends the rain - the book has a strong tendency to give Allah credit without any documentation for natural occurrences. But: If earth comes alive just because of water, it was not dead - it only looked like that.

025 45/5g: "- - - the change of the winds - are Signs - - -". See 11/7a above.

026 45/5h: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

027 45/5i: "- - - for those who are wise". See 13/3j above.

**028 45/6a: “Such are the Signs of Allah, which we (Allah*) rehearse to thee (Muhammad*) in truth - - -”. A strange saying, as all “Signs” in the Quran are logically invalid, as they either are claims or statements based on nothing or based on other invalid (not proved) claims, statements, “proofs”, etc. There may be a few exceptions for some taken from the Bible, but they in case indicate Yahweh.

029 45/6b: “- - - Signs - - -”. Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

030 45/6c "- - - which we (Allah*) rehearse to thee (Muhammad*) - - -". No god would rehearse invalid signs (Quran-speak for proofs)." A god could tell that "I did this and this", but to use it for a proof without showing that it really was he who did it - well, he at least would know that as a proof it was invalid.

031 45/6d: "- - - truth - - -". In a book with so much of the content wrong like in the Quran, words like "the truth" cannot be taken at face value without additional proofs. Also see 13/1g and 40/75 above.

032 45/6e: "- - - in what exposition will they believe after (rejecting) Allah and His Signs?" This may have multiple answers, but at least things or acts or information - or god(s) - where it is not proved that something is seriously wrong and the "holy" book full - more than full - of errors, etc. like in the Quran and in Islam. Preferably also in a religion not started by a person similar in moral standing and reliability to Muhammad.

33 45/6f: "- - - (rejecting) Allah and His Signs - - -". Wrong. You do not reject Allah by rejecting invalid signs and instead ask for valid ones. Reject Allah you only do when there are no proofs, and in addition all the mistakes in the Quran prove 110% that no omniscient god was involved in the delivery of it, plus the at least 8 places in the Quran where Muhammad himself is speaking in a book pretending to be a copy of a book in Heaven made before the Universe - a fact which in itself proves at least 100% that something is wrong a fact strengthened by the 1 - 2 places where angels are speaking, which alone proves that the book must have been made after at least the first angels were created, and thus after the heavens (7 the book claims) - a part of the Universe - were created. The really serious point here is that no god was involved in a book of such a quality. What then is the book? - at most an apocryphal one. And what then is Islam? And where do Muslims end if there is an next life with no Allah, but perhaps a god not accepting followers of a made up book and a war religion (?) like Islam?

034 45/6g: "- - - His (Allah's*) Signs - - -". Wrong. There never existed one single sign clearly showing Allah behind it.

035 45/7a: "Woe to each sinful dealer in Falsehoods - - -". A sentence provoking thoughts as so much is false - and a little even clear and willful lies - in the Quran. But as many a Muslim believe it is a good argument to murder the tellers of facts one does not like, so as to be able to go on believing old beliefs - even wrong ones - we omit to mention we are thinking about Muhammad, as we do not like to be murdered for pointing to true facts.

036 45/7b: "Woe to each sinful dealer in Falsehoods - - -". Does this also go for Muhammad if he knew that the Quran was not from a god? - and he at least suspected this strongly, because if not he had not dared to lie in the book (f. x. "no-one will believe even if Allah sends proofs, and that is the reasons why Allah do not send proofs" - quoted from memory. Any intelligent person knows such a claim is not true - at least some would believe if they got divine proofs.)

037 45/7c: "- - - sinful dealer in Falsehoods - - -". One of the stronger of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

038 45/7d: "- - - sinful - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

039 45/7e: "- - - Falsehood - - -". In the Quran this means any other religion than Islam, any information, etc. not consistent with the Quran and even any fact not consistent with the Quran. (Well, for proved facts they often tries to find explanations which makes the fact fit the Quran or the Quran fit the fact - some twisting often is used).

040 45/7f: "- - - Falsehood - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

041 45/8a: "He hears the Signs of Allah - - -". Wrong, as there in the entire world and in all the history never was one single sign indisputably from Allah. In each and every case they could as logically be claimed for other never proved gods - not to mention for the one who MAY BE is proved (if you accept relevant text in the Bible and/or the Quran to be true, Yahweh is proved, even though the Quran wrongly mixes him with Allah) - and there may be other causes.

042 45/8b: “- - - Signs of Allah - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39a above.

043 45/8c: "- - - he (the skeptic*) is obstinate and lofty, as if he had not heard them (Allah's "signs") - - -". Psychologically this was a much better "explanation" for Muhammad to give his followers and others, than to admit the plain truth: That many saw that something was seriously wrong in the new religion. There may have been other reasons, too, but f. x. for the majority of the Jews, this was the main reason.

044 45/8d: "- - - a Penalty Grievous!" See 3/77b above.

045 45/9a: "- - - Our (Allah's*) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39a above.

046 45/9b: "- - - he (the non-Muslim*) takes them (the claimed signs for Allah*) in jest - - -". Wrong: He takes them for what they are - unproved claims invalid as neither signs, nor indications, nor proofs for anything at all, as long as it is not proved it really is Allah who makes the claimed signs. Words simply are too cheap propaganda if there is nothing behind them.

047 45/9c: "- - - such - - -". Here referring to non-Muslims and/or skeptics.

048 45/9d: "- - - a humiliating Penalty". See 3/77b above.

049 45/10a: "In front of them (skeptics*) is Hell - - -". Not true unless for one thing Islam is a true religion and correctly described in the Quran, and for another thing the skeptic's religion is untrue. And if it should happen that Islam is a made up religion - like all the errors in the Quran may indicate - and another religion - f. x. Yahweh's - is real, the quote is extra wrong.

050 45/10b: "- - - nor any protector they (non-Muslims*) may have taken to themselves - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells that at least the followers of Yahweh may have taken Yahweh for a protector. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

051 45/10c: "- - - protectors (other gods*) - - - taken - - - besides Allah". See 25/18a above.

052 45/10d: "- - - a humiliating Penalty". See 3/77b above.

053 45/11a: “This (the Quran*) is (true) Guidance - - -”. A book with perhaps 3ooo mistakes, invalid statements, contradictions, etc., etc., is no true guidance. See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

054 45/11b: "- - - (true) - - -". See f.x. 2/2b and 45/6d above.

055 45/11c: "- - - those who reject the Signs of their Lord (Allah*) - - -". One of Muhammad's man negative names for non-Muslims.

056 45/11d: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

057 45/11e: "- - - a grievous Penalty of abomination". Hell. Also see 3/77b above.

058 45/12a: "It is Allah Who has subjected the sea to you - - -". One more of the nearly innumerable unproved and thus invalid claims in the Quran trying to glorify and prove Allah - in ways f.x. most pagans use for their claimed gods, too. Muhammad had few, if any, original ideas. Also see 11/7a above.

059 45/12b: "- - - that ships may sail upon it (the sea*) by His (Allah's*) command - - -". Similar to 45/12a just above. Also see 11/7a above.

060 45/12c: "- - - His (Allah's*) Bounty - - -". Everything you earn in an honest way by work or trade, or by stealing or robbing or murdering, are gifts from Allah's bounty according to the Quran - what you do yourself seems to be of less consequence - - - and may be it has to be like this in a religion where the god predestines everything you do according to its claimed holy book.

061 45/12d: "- - - that ye (Muslims/people*) may be grateful". Grateful for what as long as there only are lose words and not a single proof even for that Allah exists, not to mention that he has done anything at all. And everything just claims from a man of doubtful moral and reliability even according to central Islamic books, but liking power, riches for more power, and women.

062 45/13a: "And He (Allah*) has subjected to you - - - all that is in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and on earth - - -". See 45/12a-d above.

063 45/13b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

064 45/13c: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

065 45/13d: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

066 45/13e: "- - - in that are Signs for those who reflect." Yes, for those who reflects AND use their knowledge and their brain, there are clear signs for that something is seriously wrong with the Quran, and thus with Islam.

#067 45/13f: "- - - in that are Signs for those who reflect." Sentences like this are totally invalid both as arguments and as proofs, as they build just on unproved claims. The only thing arguments and claims like this prove, is that the user have no real arguments and no real proofs, because then he/she had used them instead.

068 45/13g: "- - - those who reflect". See 13/3j above.

##069 45/14a: “Tell those who believe, to forgive those who do not look forward to the Days of Allah.” But the word “forgive" was slowly forgotten after 622 AD – when they also took on the duty of also being enforcers. With the result: This verse is contradicted and often abrogated and “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

070 45/14b: "- - - those who believe - - -". Muslims.

071 45/14c: "- - - those who do not look forward to the Days of Allah - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

072 45/14d: "- - - the Days of Allah - - -" The meaning is unclear - different Muslim scholars give different guesses - but may be the Day of Doom, or the days of the kingdom of Allah after the Day of Doom. As we have mentioned before, the texts in the Quran frequently are unclear (in spite of what both the Quran and Muslims like to claim).

#####073 45/14e: "- - - it is for Him (Allah*) to recompense (for good or ill) each People - - -". Tell this to aggressive Islamic clergy, to Muslim warriors and terrorists.

074 45/14f: "- - - it is for Him (Allah*) to recompense (for good or ill) each People - - -". Tell this to aggressive Islamic clergy, to Muslim warriors and terrorists. But this was in Mecca, where Muhammad led a peaceful religion. Much was changed when he changed the religion to one of discrimination and blood and war after 622 AD.

075 45/14g: "- - - (- - - good - - - ill) - - -)." Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

076 45/14h: "- - - according to what they (people*) have earned". But beware of that also this is meant in accordance with the Quran's partly immoral moral code.

077 45/15a: "- - - a righteous deed - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

078 45/15b: "- - - if he (anyone*) does evil, it works against (his own soul)." Wrong in some cases: If he/she also destroys the soul of others it does not only work against his own soul. A thought very close here: Muhammad! The Quran is not from a god - too much is wrong. If Muhammad consciously made it up, all or parts of it, and if he is existing in some second world - what kind of burden is he carrying?. And another: If Muhammad made up the Quran, consciously to gain power, etc., or unconsciously because of an illness like TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) - where are all the Muslims ending, living in accordance with such a harsh and largely immoral war and discrimination religion?

079 45/15c: "- - - does evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

080 45/15d: "In the end (at the Day of Doom*) will ye (people*) (all) be brought back to your Lord (Allah)". Only if Allah is an existing god.

081 45/15e: "In the end (at the Day of Doom*) will ye (people*) (all) be brought back to your Lord (Allah)". Contradicted by the Bible, which tells one will be brought back to Yahweh, not to Allah. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

082 45/16a: "We (Allah*) did aforetime grant to the Children of Israel the Book (here the Bible/Torah*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says the involved god was Yahweh, not Allah. Also historical facts very strongly indicates that no god with a teaching like Muhammad's ever was involved in the Mosaic (Jewish) religion before 610 AD. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

083 45/16b: "- - - the Children of Israel - - -". The Jews, but literally the children of the Jewish patriarch Jacob, who was renamed Israel.

084 45/16c: "- - - the Children of Israel - - -". A historical anomaly.

085 45/17a: “- - - Clear Signs - - -.” See 2/39b and 2/99 if here is meant signs of Allah. The Jews in reality got signs from Yahweh, according to the Bible.

086 45/17b: "- - - it was only after (religious*) knowledge had been granted to them (the Jews*) that they fell into schisms, through insolent envy among themselves". You must have a very special point of view on or (lack of) knowledge of Jewish history to agree to this claim.

087 45/17c: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a above.

088 45/17d: "Verily - - -". See f.x. 45/3a above.

089 45/18a: “Then We (Allah*) put thee (Muslims*) on the (right) way of Religion - - -”. All the mistakes, contradictions, invalid statements, invalid “signs” and “proofs”, etc., give reason for serious doubts about this claim.

090 45/18b: "- - - the (right) Way of Religion - - -". Claimed to be Islam.

091 45/18c: "- - - follow not the desire of those who know not". But who are the ones who know not? - the ones who accepts all the mistakes, etc. in the Quran without questions and without checking wrong "facts", etc.? - or the ones who use their knowledge and their brain and see that something is seriously wrong with Muhammad, with the Quran, and with Islam?

092 45/18d: "- - - the ones who know not". One of Muhammad’s many negative names for non-Muslims. Also note here something which is typical for the Quran - whether people are knowledgeable or not, only depends on how much they know about Islam and if they accept the religion or not. So much for Islam and knowledge.

093 45/18e: "- - - the ones who know not". This implicates that you and your fellow Muslims know and are knowledgeable. See 13/3j above. And for that case also 26/83a above.

094 45/19a: "- - - it is only wrongdoers (that stand as) protectors (of non-Muslims*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says the followers of Yahweh have a protector in Yahweh. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

095 45/19b: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". One of Muhammad's many enemy picture inducing names for non-Muslims.

096 45/19c: "- - - Allah is the Protector of the Righteous". If He exists and is not one more mistake in the Quran. And if he in case is correctly described in that book - well, he may also be a protector if he belongs to the dark forces, but what kind of a protector?

097 45/19d: "- - - the Righteous". Muslims - only Muslims are righteous in the Quran.

098 45/19e: "- - - Righteous". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes and sometimes also in accordance with its own partly unjust sharia laws.

**099 45/19+20: “- - - Allah is the Protector of the Righteous. These are clear evidence to men - - -”. Yes, but only if it is documented that Allah really is a protector. There are no proofs for that in the Quran or anywhere else - only claims or statements based on invalid (not proved) claims or loose statements, etc. There in reality is not even a single valid proof for Allah himself. (But then it is not possible for humans to prove a god - only a god can do that. That is one of the reasons why all the “proofs” in the Quran turn out invalid – Allah refused to or was unable to prove anything). This claim is logically invalid.

100 45/20a: "- - - clear evidence - - -". There exists nowhere inside or outside the Quran a logically valid proof neither for Allah nor for Muhammad's contact with a god. The best proof for this is Islam's science about it - if even one had existed, you had met in every Islamic media - clear and often.

101 45/20b: “These are clear evidence to men and a Guidance - - - to (the Muslims*).” See 45/19+20 above - how can an invalid “proof” be guidance? After all a proof/evidence is one or more proved fact(s) which can give only one conclusion whereas Islam/Muhammad/the Quran far too often use unproven claims or statement only as basis for new claims, instead of proved facts – and then any conclusion is invalid.

102 45/20c: "- - - Mercy - - -". See 1/1a above.

103 45/20d: "- - - those of assured Faith". Muslims.

104 45/20e: "- - - assured - - -". See 2/2b above.

105 45/20f: "- - - Faith". Islam.

106 45/21a: “What! Do those who seek after evil ways (non-Muslims*) think We (Allah*) shall hold them equal with those who believe (Muslims*) and do righteous deeds - - -?” In a religion and a society of discrimination and apartheid like described in the Quran, this just is a rhetoric question.

107 45/21b: “What! Do those who seek after evil ways (non-Muslims*) think We (Allah*) shall hold them equal with those who believe (Muslims*) and do righteous deeds - - -?” Except for that there is a question whether it is a righteous deed, f.x. for a thousand years to give their believers education only in Muslim sciences - all knowledge that was needed to study Islam, mainly religion and Arab and related knowledge - but block as many believers as possible from all “foreign sciences” = all other knowledge, which was the case at least from al-Ghazali ("The Incoherence of the Philosophers") at the end of the 11th century (in Spain about 100 years later) - except for things like that, may be the Quran is right: Muslims are the top of qualities.

108 45/21c: (YA4759): “What! do those who seek after evil ways think that We (Allah*) shall hold them equal with those who believe and do righteous deeds - - -?” Here 3 different meanings are possible: 1) The evil ones are not in Allah’s sight like the righteous ones. 2) The evil ones and the good ones are not the same in this life and in the next life – the evil ones may flourish in this life, but the good ones in the next. 3) The real life of the righteous is not like the one of the evil ones – their spiritual life is different.

109 45/21d: "- - - those who seek after evil - - -". One of Muhammad's many enemy picture inducing names for non-Muslims.

110 45/21e: "- - - those who believe - - -". Muslims. The Quran uses such words only for Muslims.

111 45/21f: "- - - do righteous - deeds - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes and sometimes also in accordance with its own partly unjust sharia laws.

112 45/21g: "- - - (do the bad non-Muslims believe*) that equal will be their (and Muslims*) life and their death? Ill judgment that they make." Clear words for your money - they even may be true if Allah exists, is a major god and is correctly described in the Quran - among all the mistakes there. Not to mention how correct it is - but the other way around - if Allah is a made up god, which is highly likely as the Quran is not from a god. And even more so if there on top of all somewhere exists a real god, f.x. Yahweh, the non-Muslim believes in.

113 45/21h: "Ill is the judgment they (non-Muslims believing they are on par with Muslims*) make". The sentence tells something about Muslims. It also shows what Muslims of today are thought and told about non-Muslims. It reminds one of ideas from fascism, Nazism, extreme communism, etc. Further comment not necessary.

114 45/22a: "Allah created - - -". The Quran and Islam both are strongly creationistic.

115 45/22b: "Allah created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and earth - - -". One more of the many never proved claims Muhammad makes on natural phenomena for glorification of and proof for his god. Logically totally invalid as he never proves it really is Allah who is behind it.

116 45/22c: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.

117 45/2d: "- - - for just ends - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust judicial code, etc.

118 45/22e: "- - - wronged - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes and sometimes also in accordance with its own partly unjust sharia laws.

119 45/23a: "- - - such a one as takes as his god his own vain desire - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative for - here at least some - non-Muslims.

120 45/23b: "Allah has - - - sealed his (a non-Muslim*) hearing and his heart (and understanding), and put a cover on his sight (to make it impossible for him to find the way to Paradise*)". Read the NT and see if this can be the same god Jesus told about - f.x about the lost sheep (Matt. 18/12-14). Not by long miles!!

121 45/23c: "- - - after Allah (has withdrawn guidance) - - -". If Allah does not exist or is no god, there is no guidance to withdraw. And even if he should happen to exist, there is not much true guidance to find in his guidebook - too much is wrong there.

122 45/23d: "- - - guidance (the Quran*) - - -". There is not much reliable guidance in a book full of errors.

123 45/23e: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., with partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes - and even some unjust laws? Dictated by a man of dubious moral and reliability, liking power, riches for more power - and women?

124 45/24a: "- - - they (opponents of Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

125 45/24b: "- - - they (opponents of Muhammad*) say: 'What is there - - -'". How could this reliably be written in the claimed "Mother Book" (of which the Quran is a copy according to Muhammad) billions of years before it was said or happened? One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

Also see 3/154e, 6/149a, 7/34a, 14/22b, and not least 27/22-26 above.

126 45/24c: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a above.

127 45/24d: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) merely conjecture" But if the Quran is not from a god or from a dressed up devil - what is it but conjecture?

128 45/25a: “- - - Our (Allah's*) Clear Signs - - -.” There are no clear signs of Allah – or of Muhammad’s connection to a god – in all the Quran. See 2/22.

129 45/25b: "- - - they (opponents of Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

130 45/25c: "- - - they (opponents of Muhammad*) say: 'Bring (back) - - -'". See 45/24b above.

131 45/25d: "Bring back our (skeptics'*) forefathers, if what ye (Muhammad*) say is true!" Already then Muhammad and Islam had questions for proof - they never were able to prove any - not one - of their central claims.

132 45/26a: "Say (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

133 45/26b: "It is Allah who gives you (persons*) life - - -". See 6/2b, 11/7a and 21/56d above.

134 45/26c: "- - - then He (Allah*) gives you death - - -". Yes, it is well known that Allah and his followers give death to many. Many of them even murders prohibited by the Quran (according to the Quran you f. x. shall not kill women, children and old ones, and not people who are not guilty in anything - and no indiscriminate killing.)

135 45/26d: "- - - He (Allah*) will gather you (people*) together for the day of Judgment - - -". Only possible if Allah exists and is a god (well, perhaps also if he belongs to the dark forces).

136 45/26e: “- - - the Day of Judgment, about which there is no doubt - - -”. Because of all the mistakes, etc., in the Quran, there is every reason for doubt, and especially about a Muslim style Day of Judgment.

137 45/26f: "- - - but most men do not understand". But who are they? - the ones accepting wrong facts, etc. from blind faith and without questions or checking anything? - or the ones understanding that something is wrong in Islam and thus do not understand any reason for blind and wrong faith?

138 45/27a: "To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -." See f.x. 45/22b above.

139 45/27b: "To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth - - -." Contradicted by the Bible, which says this belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

140 45/27c: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

141 45/27d: "- - - the Day (belongs to Allah in which*) the Hour of Judgment is established". The time for the Day of Doom is predestined according to Allah's Plan.

142 45/27e: "- - - the dealers in Falsehood - - -". One of Muhammad’s many distaste - and stronger - inducing names for non-Muslims.

143 45/27f: "- - - the dealers in Falsehood - - -". Whom does this include as the Quran with all its errors is not from a god, and as there are much, much falsehood in it?

144 45/27g: "- - - Falsehood - - -". All religions except Islam. But this is contradicted by the Bible, which tells it is telling the truth - and both science and Islam has thoroughly proved the Bible is not falsified. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

145 45/27h: "- - - that Day (of Doom*) the dealers of Falsehood perish". Pep-talk for followers, warning for others. But also see 3/77b above.

146 45/28a: "- - - Record - - -". Why does an omniscient god need a record?

147 45/28b: "This Day - - -". The Day of Doom.

148 45/28c: "This Day shall ye (people/sects*) be recompensed for all that ye did!" This may well be - but by whom? As the Quran is form no god, and there never has been a real proof for Allah, he is highly unlikely to be anything but the old pagan god al-Lah in a new suit, and thus no existing god. Then who will recompense people for good and bad deeds, prayers for forgiving, etc.? One may hope for a good and benevolent god, but what then about all the Muslims who have lived according to the Quran's harsh war religion laws?

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not, many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

149 45/29a: "This Our (Allah's*) Record speaks about you with truth - - -". Why does an omniscient god need a record?

150 45/29b: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

151 45/29c: "- - - for We (Allah*) were wont to put on record all that ye (humans*) did". Similar to 45/29a above.

152 45/29d: "- - - put on record all that ye (people*) did". According to the Quran, your deeds count very much on the Day of Doom - a convenient whip for religious leaders to use to keep followers obedient and willing. Especially cheap for the leaders if the religion is a made up one.

153 45/30a: "- - - those who believe - - -". Muslims.

154 45/30b: “- - - those who believed and did righteous deeds, their Lord (Allah*) will admit them to His Mercy - - -.” Plain and simple. (And of course the best deed was and is to go to war.) But it is totally dependent on that Allah exists, is a god, and is correctly described in the Quran.

155 45/30c: "- - - righteous deeds - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes and sometimes also in accordance with its own partly unjust sharia laws.

156 45/30d: "- - - their (Muslims*) Lord (Allah*) will admit them to his Mercy - - -". If he exists and if the Quran in addition has told the full truth and only the truth.

157 45/30e: "- - - His (Allah's*) Mercy - - -". Here the Quran's and Islam's Paradise - see 10/9f above.

158 45/30f: "- - - that will be the Achievement for all to see". With all the errors in the Quran; is this just another error?

-159 45/31a: "- - - those who rejected Allah - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

160 45/31b: “- - - Our (Allah's) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

161 45/31c: "- - - but ye (non-Muslims*) were arrogant - - -". May be the reality was that they were intelligent.

162 45/31d: "- - - sin - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

163 45/32a: "- - - the promise of Allah was true - - -". In all records there never was one case of a promise clearly from Allah which provably came true by an act from Allah.

164 45/32b: "- - - true - - -". See f.x. 13/1g and 40/75 above.

165 45/32c: "- - - the Hour - - -". The Day of Doom.

166 45/32d: “- - - there was no doubt about its (the Judgment Day*) (coming) - - -”. See 45/26e above.

167 45/33: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

168 45/33-35: These three verses only are true if Allah exists, is a major god and in addition is correctly described in the Quran.

169 45/34a: "This Day - - -". The Day of Doom.

170 45/34b: "- - - the Fire - - -". Hell.

171 45/34c: "- - - no helpers have ye (non-Muslims*)". Contradicted by the Bible, which says that Yahweh will take care of his followers. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

172 45/35a: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) take the Signs of Allah in jest - - -". No, but they are taken for what they are: Invalid and never proved claims which proves not a thing as long as it is not proved it really is Allah who is behind it.

173 45/35b: “- - - Signs of Allah - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b and 2/99 above.

174 45/35c: "- - - deceived - - -". Who are most easily deceived - the ones who use their brains and knowledge and thinks things over, or the ones who tumbles into blind belief? - and not to mention the ones brainwashed from baby age and not even able to think things over?

175 45/35d: "- - - that Day - - -". The Day of Doom.

176 45/35e: "- - - nor shall they (non-Muslims*) be received into Grace". Pep-talk for his followers - if you look for it, you will find much pep-talk for Muhammad's followers in the Quran. And warning to non-Muslims. But also see 3/77b above.

177 45/35f: "- - - received into Grace". Enter the Quran's Paradise - see 10/9f above.

178 45/36a: "- - - Praise be to Allah - - -". Read 1/1a and see if he merits praise - if he exists.

179 45/36b: "- - - Allah, Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong) and Lord of the earth - - -". Two more never proved and thus totally invalid claims Muhammad uses to glorify and prove his god - and his own platform of power.

180 45/36c: "- - - Allah, Lord of the heavens (plural and wrong) and Lord of the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the lord, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

181 45/36d: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

182 45/36e: "- - - (Allah is*) Lord and Cherisher of all the Worlds (plural and wrong*)!". See 45/36b+c above.

183 45/36f: “- - - the Worlds - - -“. The trouble for the Quran is that the 7 Earths this refers to, do not exist. See 65/12b below.

184 45/37a: "- - - to Him (Allah*) be Glory - - -". Read 1/1a and see if he is worth it.

185 45/37b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

186 45/37c: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". He in case never clearly has proved it.

187 45/37d: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom”. Not if he made the Quran. See 13/1g and40/75 above

Surah 45: Sub-total: 187 + 16.536 = 16.723 comments.

THE LIST CONTINUES 4 - 5 A-4 PAGES FURTHER DOWN.

000000000000000000000000000000000000

NB: If you find any mistakes anywhere, please inform us. If it is a real mistake, it will be corrected. Please also inform us if we have overlooked points or errors.


>>> Go to Next Surah

>>> Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".