1000+ Comments on the Quran: Surah 33 -- Al-Ahzab (The Confederates)

Revelation: Medina 625 - 629 AD

(See general comments on Surahs here: Introduction)


 

The quotes and comments

001 "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captured - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

*002 33/1a: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person who:

Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not see the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion.

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

003 33/1b: "O Prophet (Muhammad*)!" A historical anomaly.

004 33/1c: "Fear Allah - - -". No reason unless he exists and is something supernatural (but may be double reason if he in case belongs to the dark forces.

005 33/1d "- - - hearken (listen*) not to the Unbelievers - - -". A clear order.

006 33/1e "- - - Unbelievers - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

007 33/1f: "- - - verily - - -". See 32/22c above.

008 33/1g: “- - - Allah is full of knowledge and wisdom.” The mistakes, etc. in the Quran proves the opposite – or that something else is wrong.

009 33/1h: "- - - knowledge - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it normally (nearly always) means religious (Islam) and related knowledge. This later used to be called "Islamic knowledge" and was good. All other sciences were "foreign knowledge" and were bad - even violently persecuted at times (a fact never mentioned by Muslims boasting about how Islam saved the old Greek and Persian knowledge (after they had destroyed the old Persia) - which largely was done not because of Islam, but in spite of Islam).

010 33/2a: "But follow that which comes to thee (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

011 33/2b: “- - - that which comes to thee (the words of the Quran to Muhammad*) by inspiration from thy Lord (Allah*) - - - “. Can a book with that many mistakes and contradictions, that many “signs” and “proofs” without logical value, and absolutely without one single valid proof, told by a man of such a “good” quality (see 31/30) really and surely come from a benevolent, kind, good and omniscient god? Or is anything wrong with Allah? Actually also Islam most reluctantly accepts that there is no proof of Allah, or of Allah’s sending down the Quran or of Islam. A book like “The Message of the Quran” dismisses this with that intellectually it is impossible not to see from the texts of the Quran that the book is made from Allah, and that it is a primitive way of thinking and reasoning, to have to ask for proofs to accept the full truth of the Quran (actually that is to turn reality upside down; one has to be very primitive - and naive - to accept something to be true, just because a rather suspect book repeats and repeats that it must be true - repeat a lie often enough, and people will start to believe it, Goebbels said.)

Nyet - a good English word meaning doubly no: Such a book is from no-one omniscient.

012 33/2c: "- - - by inspiration - - -". A very convenient way to get information, at least if you need some extra help from your god f. x. in your family life. Also impossible for others to check. The word is not mentioned in connection with the prophets in the Bible Yahweh only used direct contact, visions, and dreams for giving information (4. Mos. 12/6-8).

013 33/2d: "- - - thy Lord (Allah*) - - -". Allah is nobody's lord unless he exists and is something supernatural (but beware that he can be somebody's lord if he exists, even if he belongs to the dark forces).

014 33/2e: "- - - for Allah is well acquainted with (all) that ye know". The old reminder: Do not try to cheat Allah or your leaders. But also see 2/233h above.

015 33/3a: "- - - put trust in Allah - - -". Rather risky as long as nothing is proved about him, and most likely he does not even exist.

016 33/3b: "- - - trust in Allah - - -". See 2/2b above.

017 33/3c: "- - - (Allah is*) a Disposer of all affairs". Allah decides everything - predestines everything.

018 33/4a: “Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body - - -“. Wrong. This really has happened – like almost anything else in the complicated creation which is man.

019 33/4b: "- - - divorce by zihar - - -". - an extra sadistic form for divorce: You tell your wife she is to you like your mother's back. Then you are free from her, but she is not free to marry again, and in a society where women hardly could find work, this could make life very difficult for her - she more or less had to stay on as his slave.

020 33/4c: "- - - nor has He (Allah*) made your adopted sons your son". In the old Arabia an adopted son was a real son, and it was prohibited for you to marry his wife if she became a widow or was divorced. But Muhammad had an adopted son, Zaid, and fell on love - or in desire - with Zaid's wife. The convenient (?) solution was that Allah (?) happened (?) to send down (?) verses telling that in spite of the old laws, an adopted son was not a son, and thus that Muhammad could marry her if she was divorced - which she quickly was and they married shortly after. But no matter Allah or not - the Arabs had a bad feeling about this marriage, and even today Muslims often are extra thorough when they explain about this marriage - the thoroughness of a small and denied bad feeling. And no matter how thorough an explanation: It was betrayal against Zaid.

021 33/4d: “But Allah (the Quran*) tells (you) the truth - - -”. May be Allah does, but the Quran does so only now and then - see all the mistakes and invalid signs and proofs.

022 33/4e: "- - - truth - - -". See 2/2b and 13/1g above and 40/75 below.

023 33/4f: “- - - He (Allah*) shows the (right) Way.” Not possible if the Quran is the words of Allah – too many mistakes, etc. A book that at best is partly true is a bad map. And also not possible if Allah does not exist.

024 33/4g: "- - - the (right) Way". The claimed road to the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

025 33/5a: "Call them (adopted sons*) by (the names of their) - - -". See 33/4c above.

026 33/5b: "- - - that (name adopted sons after their real fathers*) is juster in the sight of Allah". This may be correct, and also zoologically there is no reason for not marrying the widowed or divorced wife of your adopted son. But Muhammad's motif for this change of the old law was highly doubtful.

027 33/5c: "(What counts is) the intention of your (Muslims'*) heart - - -". How many times was the real motif behind Muhammad's "holy" raids loot, extortion, slaves and riches? - and how often was this the real motif behind the Muslim warriors' lust for such raids?

028 33/5d: "- - - Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." See surahs from Medina, the immoral and sometimes inhuman parts of the Islamic moral code, and the unjust parts of sharia - read them and see if you agree. Whenever there are divergences - not to mention an abyss - between nice words and actual life, we always believe in the actual life.

029 33/6a: “The Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person who:

Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not see the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran”; prophesying is a kind of miracle -seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracle connected to Muhammad also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f. x. Al-Bukhari) states that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden and what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet.

Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F. x. 1. Sam. 9/9, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1.Chr.29/29, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen".

Many liked the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for the name - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***And this is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

030 33/6b: "The Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

031 33/6c: "The Prophet (Muhammad*) is closer to the Believers than their own selves - - -". His followers hardly were aware of it, but this is an extremely strong demand on them.

032 33/6d: "- - - the Decree of Allah - - -". There is no proof for that it is from Allah - - - if he exists. False prophets often claims to be quoting their god when they in reality are not - sometimes even quoting only themselves.

033 33/6e: "- - - believers - - -". Muslims.

034 33/6f: "- - - Muhajirs - - -". Muslims who fled from Mecca because of persecution in and before 622 AD.

035 33/7a: "- - - We (Allah*) took from the Prophets their Covenant - - -". Even if we omit the fact that the Bible talks about Yahweh and the Quran about Allah - 2 obviously very different gods - there still remains the fact that Yahweh did not make that kind of a covenant with his prophets like said in verses 7 and 8, for the very obvious reason that he did not need that kind of information - according to the Bible Yahweh is really omniscient for things which happens, and then why should he ask for what he already knew? One more clear difference between Yahweh and Allah. Not the same god. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

036 33/7b: "- - - We (Allah*) took from the Prophets their Covenant: as (We did) from thee (Muhammad*) - - -". There is no proof for a covenant between Allah and Muhammad - or the Muslims. A number of claims, but not one proof. Worse: The only "documentation" for his very existence is a made up - at least from no god - book based only on the words of a man with highly dubious moral and reliability, liking power and women (not uncommon for self proclaimed "prophets"./p€>

037 33/7c: "- - - thee (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

038 33/7d: "- - - Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus - - -". 4 historical covenants. It also is not correct of Muhammad to compare himself to those 4, as their teachings are so different from Muhammad's, that he clearly does not belong in that line of prophets/messengers - this in spite of Muhammad's claim (even if things are claimed, they are not necessarily true).

039 33/7e: "- - - Jesus the son of Mary - - -". See 5/110a above.

040 33/8a: “That (Allah) may question the (custodians (see 33/7 and 33/8a just above*)) of Truth concerning the Truth they (were charged with) - - -”. The Quran says/pretends that the old scriptures of Israel were the same as in the Quran, but that bad Jews distorted them. If that had been true, they at best were charged with bits and pieces of truth - see all mistakes, lofty “explanations” and invalid “signs” and “proofs” in the Quran. (Besides science has proved the Bible - here OT - is not falsified. Islam has proved it even stronger by being unable to find any falsification in all the thousands of relevant old manuscripts. There may be some mistakes, but no falsifications.) One more thing: No omniscient god like what Yahweh is according to the Bible, needs to ask about anything which has happened. (It is done some times in the Bible, but for rhetoric reasons.)

041 33/8b: “- - - the (custodians (those whom the Quran reckons to be prophets or other teachers of religion*)) of Truth (the teachings of Islam*) - - -”. The teachings of Islam as represented by the Quran, at best is partly true - see all the mistakes (and contradictions and invalid “proofs” and “signs“, etc.).

042 33/8c: "- - - Truth - - -". See 2/2b and 13/1g above.

043 33/8d: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Non-Muslims.

044 33/8e: "- - - a grievous Penalty". See 3/77b above.

045 33/9a: "- - - ye who believe!" Muslims.

046 33/9b: "- - - when there came down on you (Muslims*) hosts (to overwhelm you - - -". In the 3 battles between Muslims and Mecca, the Muslims each time were outnumbered. But it is a military fact that attack is more difficult and dangerous than defence, and the will to fight - plus the trench and the weather in the last case - decided the outcome: Muslims won at Badr, lost at Uhud, but for a price which made Mecca wait too long before following up the narrow victory, and a draw at Medina, which in reality won the war.

047 33/9c: "Remember the Grace of Allah, (bestowed) on you (Muslims*) - - -". There never in all history and before was a documented case of Allah bestowing anything on anyone - Muslims or not. A lot of claims, but not one documented case. And for comparison: Muslims claimed there were several hundred thousand Hadiths - the collectors found that only a very small percent of them may be - may be - true.

048 33/9d: "- - - We (Allah*) sent - - - a hurricane - - -". See 11/7a above.

049 33/9e: "- - - a hurricane - - -". This refers to "the Battle - or rather siege* - of the Trench" at Medina. It hardly was a hurricane, but a lasting, strong and cold wind was part of the reason why Mecca gave up the attack.

050 33/9f: "- - - and forces ye (the people of Medina*) saw not - - -". After the siege was lifted, Muhammad claimed that part of the reason for the "victory" was an army of warrior angels sent down by Allah.

051 33/9g: "- - - Allah sees (clearly) what ye (people*) do". The standard warning and promise - "the carrot and the stick" - but also see 2/233h above.

052 33/9-10: There were a few cases where Muhammad claimed they had got help from Allah - but only claims, no real indication, not to mention a clear-cut case. Such claims are cheap.

053 33/11a: "In that situation where the Believers tried - - -". Why - WHY -does an omniscient god need to try his followers? The question is quite different if the is an explanation Muhammad used for the cost in difficulties for his raids and wars. 

054 33/11b: "- - - the Believers - - -". The Muslims.

055 33/12a: "- - - those in whose hearts is a disease - - -". "Quran-speak" for non-Muslims. A sympathetic name?

056 33/12b: "- - - (non-Muslims*) (even) say - - -". A historical anomaly.

057 33/12c: "- - - (non-Muslims*) (even) say: 'Allah and - - -'". How could this reliably be written into the claimed "Mother Book" (of which the Quran is a copy according to Muhammad) billions of years before it was said or happened? One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

Also see 3/154e, 6/149a, 7/34a, 14/22b, and not least 27/22-26 above.

058 33/12d: "- - - Allah and His Messenger - - -". Muhammad's main mantra to glue himself to his god - his platform of power.

059 33/12e: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/6a below.

060 33/12f: "- - - Allah and His Messenger promised us (non-Muslims at the time of Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

061 33/12g: "- - - Allah and His Messenger promised us nothing but dilution". Already at that time there were many who saw that something was seriously wrong with Muhammad and with his new religion.

062 33/12-15 Pep-talk for the lukewarm - not all wanted to wage war, but Muhammad demanded this - or maybe it was the benevolent, good god Allah?

063 33/13a: "Ye man of Yathrib! Ye cannot stand (the attack)! Therefore go back!" There was some pessimism before the siege and some wanted out of the war. But it may also refer to the battle of Uhud, where some 300 left Muhammad before the battle. Or it may refer to some raid or something - it was common that the ones not wanting to go to war, tried to find an excuse for staying at home.

064 33/13b: "- - - Yathrib - - -". The original name of the town Mecca. Little by little the name Medina took over. Medina is short for "The town of the prophet".

065 33/13c: “- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

066 33/13d: "- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly. 

067 33/13e: "Truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

068 33/13f: "Truly our houses are bare and exposed - - -". See 3313a above - and it is symptomatic that the houses in reality were not really exposed.

069 33/14: Not all Muslims wanted to go to war - and it should be remembered that the same is the case today.

070 33/15a: "- - - they (Muslims*) had already a covenant with Allah - - -". Is this sure and secure as there are so many other things which are wrong in the Quran? - And what if the book is all false? - it at least in no case is from any god (too many mistake, contradictions, cases of wrong logic, etc.). Some Dutch settlers in South Africa once made a "covenant" and a deal with Yahweh/God - - - but "forgot" to invite him to talks about how the covenant should be, and forgot to ask him if he accepted the deal. As there is no god behind a book of such a sorrowful quality (except the superficial and irrelevant fact that the language later was polished to good standard - irrelevant because the only thing which counts in a religion is: Is it a true religion with a true god?) like the Quran, this verse makes us think about that parody.

071 33/15b: "- - - they (Muslims*) had already a covenant with Allah not to turn their back (in war/battle) - - -". Quite a covenant for any dictator to push his warriors - would have been a dream for any such one - - - and Muhammad had it! Not to mention: Compare this with NT!!!

##072 33/15c: "- - - they (Muslims*) had already a covenant with Allah not to turn their back (in war/battle) - - -". Also quite a theme for a covenant with/from the claimed good and benevolent god of "the religion of peace". Try to compare this with: "You shall not kill (or sometimes translated 'murder')" (The 10 Commandments, 2. Mos. 20/13), not to mention "Turn the other cheek" in the time of the New Covenant (Luke.22/20).

There also is another fact which often strikes us when the Quran claims that Yahweh and Allah is the same god: The Mosaic religion had a rather strict god - Yahweh could be harsh and strict and bloody. But his harshness and his tendencies to be bloody had a limited purpose: To make the Jews a believing people and to create space for a homeland for them. When this was done - at least after a fashion - - - and when there for the first time in history came a period of peace and international open connections - the Pax Romanum - long enough for a peaceful religion to set strong enough roots to survive later harsh times in this normally unruly part of the world, he let the more peaceful and human sides of his religion take over. All this for suddenly changing his mind around 622 AD when Muhammad started to need warriors and moral explanation for his raids of thieving, enslaving and murder, and not only return to the harsher version of his religion from OT, but taking it far into Odin's and Thor's Valhalla (gods and the Paradise of the Vikings) and blood and war, or Djingis Khan's pure religion of war - or actually even further.

And the thought which strikes us is: This god must have a "jumbled up" "top floor" to change his mind frequently and much:

If Muhammad and the Quran are correct on this point, the god drifted form a rather benevolent, but strict religion (OT) with some harsh spots, towards a religion (NT) dominated of mildness and love. (Before you fire your machine-guns: Remember we are talking about how the book tells the religion should be, not how it in reality was practiced or disused some times and places).

Then suddenly in 622 AD in the space of a few months, the god not only returns to his stricter and obsolete OT-ideas, but creates a new and full-fledged hate and war religion (that Islam is "the religion of peace" is pure al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and propaganda - just read the Quran and the Hadiths and see for yourself, only remember that when nice words are contradicted by harsh demands and deeds and rules, it is the demands and deeds and rules which are telling the truth, not the nice, but cheap words).

And our thoughts continue: This god is a master of mental slalom - or he is undecided. Or of inability to make up his mind.

To our knowledge there never before - or after - was a religion which drifted from benevolent, but strict, to peace and love, for them to change once more, and now to the very opposite: A religion of discrimination, superiority complex, and a pure and war religion - from politeness and from a small feeling that the word "hate" is just a little too strong, we omit that word here.

To our knowledge there also never in history was another religion which change so completely - here from relatively peaceful to a full war religion - in such a short time: Just some months, maximum 2 years (in the period 622 - 624 AD).

Did Allah find peace too boring and changed his mind ones more to get more action and blood and human misery?

Or was it Muhammad who suddenly wanted warriors for his raids?

073 33/15d: "- - - (surely) - - -". See 2/2b above.

074 33/16a: "Say (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

075 33/16b: “Running away will not profit you, if you are running away from death or slaughter; and even if (ye do escape) , no more than a brief (respite) will ye be allowed to enjoy”. Wrong. It is very easy to prove by means of statistics, that if you get away from a battle, your chances for being alive one year later, greatly improve. Any god had known – but Muhammad did not know statistics. (Actually the claim also is contra-intuitive and against common sense – he had to know they were lies even if he knew no statistics, but predestination was good propaganda for getting more warriors and more ferocious warriors. Also see 3/154 below). Besides: Even a short piece of time + another place are divergences from Allah's omniscient previous predestination and knowledge.

**076 33/16c: “Running away will not profit you (Muslim warriors*), if ye are running away from death or slaughter, and even if (ye do escape), no more than a brief (respite) will ye be allowed to enjoy”. Well, this proves two things: It is not possible to escape predestination - no matter what Islam tries to tell you today that "it is not real predestination" (with predestination man has no free will, and it is immoral by Allah to punish for sins) - and that in spite of the Quran, you at least can change your destination with “a brief respite“. A respite that at least has to be for some hours or days - if not there had been newly-dead frightened warriors laying around the nearest tens and more kilometers from some battlefields - dead for no obvious reasons after fleeing from battle.

This in addition to that modern statistical science long since has proved this verse nonsense.

But Muhammad got many and terrific, but naïve warriors - - - and was so intelligent that he had to know he was lying.

077 33/16d: “Running away will not profit you (humans/Muslims*), if ye are running away from death and slaughter; and even if (ye do escape), no more than a brief (respite) will ye be allowed to enjoy.” This is one of the really clear declarations: Go to war for Muhammad (and his successors), because you will not die until your time is up anyhow – and when it is up, you will die no matter. (It is likely this was the main reason behind Muhammad's strong claims about predestination, and also for the fact that he seems to have put more stress on predestination in later years, than in the more peaceful times in Mecca.

078 33/16e: “Running away will not profit you (humans/Muslims*), if ye are running away from death and slaughter; and even if (ye do escape), no more than a brief (respite) will ye be allowed to enjoy.” This is one more 100% proof for that something is wrong: Even if it had been true that they would be given only a brief respite, the laws of chaos had changed the future because of that respite, and thus changed Allah's claimed unchangeable Plan.

079 33/17a: "Say (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

080 33/17b: "Who can screen you (people*) from Allah - - -". Anyone if Allah does not exist - and there also is the Question of f.x. Yahweh.

081 33/17c: "- - - Punishment - - -". See 3/77b above.

082 33/17d: "- - - Mercy (from Allah*) - - -". See 1/1a above.

083 33/17e: "Nor will they (people*) find for themselves, besides Allah, any protector or helper".

This only can be true if Allah exists and is a major god. There are no real indications for that this is the case.

And it only can be true if no other god exists - and the Quran admits that the old Jewish god exists, even though they try to call him Allah instead of Yahweh (the two cannot be the same god in spite of the Quran's claims - the basic ideas of the teachings are too different.

084 33/18a: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b and 32/22e above.

085 33/18b: "Verily, Allah knows those among you who keep back (men) - - -". According to the Quran Allah knows absolutely everything - do not try to cheat.

086 33/18c: "- - - those who say (to Muhammad's warriors*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

087 33/18d: "- - - those who say (to Muhammad's warriors*) - - -". See 33/12c above.

088 33/18e: "- - - (some bad men*) come not to fight except for a little while". Compare this to NT. Definitely not the same god - and Jesus and Muhammad even more surely not in the same line of prophets (even if Muhammad had been a real prophet).

089 33/19a: “- - - when fear comes, thou (Muslim warrior*) wilt see them looking to thee, their eyes revolving, like (those of) over one whom hovers death: but when the fear is past, they will smite you with sharp tongues, covetous of goods.” They – the bad ones – are no good. You certainly are of better stuff? Pep-talk.

##090 33/19b: "- - - covetous of goods". Stealing/robbing - and raping, enslaving and suppressing - were heavy motifs for many of the warriors. And Islam never debates the economic, cultural and human catastrophes "the religion of peace" under a good and benevolent god and a semi-saintly self proclaimed prophet inflicted on millions. They only talk about the glorious warriors, stolen riches, lots of slaves and slave women, and power. Where is the ethics, the moral, the empathy? If you read Muslim religious literature, you will see that the fundamental mentality and ideology are the same today.

"Do unto others like you want others do unto you"?

091 33/19c: "Such men (who do not want to fight*) have no faith - - -.” – and are not good. Pep-talk: You of course are better?

#####092 33/19d: "Such men (who do not want to fight*) have no faith - - -.” What does it tell about Muhammad and Islam that they stated that unless you were a willing warrior, you were no good Muslim? Some contrast to propaganda about "Islam is the religion of peace"!!

093 33/19e: "- - - faith - - -". Islam - only Islam is faith in the Quran.

094 33/19f: "- - - that is easy for Allah". Similar claims you find several places in the Quran - but not one time a proved case.

095 33/20a: "They (non-Muslims and bad Muslims in Medina*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

096 33/20b: "They (non-Muslims and bad Muslims in Medina*) think that - - -". See 33/12c above.

097 33/20c: "- - - the Confederates - - -". The army attacking Medina in 627 AD - mainly Meccans.

098 33/20d: "- - - the Confederates - - -". A historical anomaly.

099 33/20e: "- - - they (no good Muslims*) would fight but a little". Pep-talk: You of course are better?

###100 33/21a: “Ye (Muslims*) have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the final Day - - -“. Wrong. Thieving/robbing, womanizing, raping, lying, betraying, extorting, suppressing, murdering, hate mongering, war mongering, mass murder, raids for robbing and killing, and wars of aggression – that is no “beautiful pattern” according to any human moral or ethical philosophy, except in some war religions, included Islam. It tells volumes about Islam that this man is their greatest hero and shining idol. The claim is strongly contradicted by the realities in his teachings and his life, based on Islamic historical sources.

But it is worth remembering that Islam uses the same glorious words about Muhammad and all his deeds and "undeeds" today, like the ones Muhammad here used about himself. It tells something about Islam and about some Muslims - especially about the leaders and the scholars who really know the Quran and Muhammad.

101 33/21b: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

102 33/21c: "- - - the Messenger of Allah - - -". One of Muhammad's mantras to glue himself to his god and his platform of power. But the message Muhammad told about, was the Quran. And as the Quran with all its errors, etc. is not from a god, can then Muhammad be a messenger from a god?

103 33/21d: "- - - the Messenger of Allah - - -". See 63/5a above.</>

104 33/21e: "- - - the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

105 33/21f: "- - - the Final Day - - -". The Day of Doom.

106 33/21g: "- - - the Praise of Allah". But does he deserve it - if he exists? See 1/1a above.

107 33/22a: When the really believing Muslims in Medina saw the attacking force in 627 AD (Battle of the Trench) “it only added to their faith and their zeal in obedience”. Tales of heroism induces lust for heroism – a psychologically right story.

108 33/22b: "- - - Believers - - -". Muslims.

109 33/22c: "- - - the Confederate - - -". The forces which attacked Medina and its Muslims.

110 33/22d: "- - - Allah and His Messenger - - -". Muhammad's most used mantra to glue himself to Allah - his platform of power.

111 33/22e: "- - - His (Allah’s*) Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

112 33/22f: "- - - His (Allah’s*) Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

113 33/22g: "- - - true". See 2/2b above.

114 33/22h: "- - - their zeal in obedience". Glorify obedience and it induces willingness to obedience in naive minds - a psychologically good phrase if Muhammad wanted obedience. Leaders often do - and dictators more than others.

115 33/23a: "- - - Believers - - -". Muslims.

116 33/23b: "- - - true to their (some Muslims*) Covenant - - -". Psychological parallel to 33/22h above.

117 33/23c: "- - - their (some Muslims*) Covenance with Allah - - -". See 33/15a+b+c above.

118 33/23d: "- - - some (Muslims*) have completed their vow (to the extreme) - - -". = They have been killed in raids and wars for riches, Allah and Muhammad - or at least for riches and Muhammad (nearly all the raids during the lifetime of Muhammad were for stealing riches - and Muhammad god 20% to 100% of what they stole (20% if there was a fight, 100% if the victims gave in without a fight). For comparison we may mention that one single time in the Bible - in the OT - Yahweh asked for a tribute from spoils taken in a war. He asked for 1:500 (= 0.2% - 4. Mos. 30/28). Allah/Muhammad demanded 100 to 500 times as much - and each and every time. The same god? Please use your brain, not only your ears.

119 33/23e: "- - - some (of Muhammad's warriors*) (still) wait - - -". A historical anomaly.

120 33/24a: "That Allah may reward the men - - -". This will depend entirely on for one thing if he exists, for another if he wants to (= if the Quran has told the truth about him being a god of war and blood), and if he in case is able to = if he is something supernatural (and remember that if he in case belongs to the dark forces, the "reward" may be surprising).

121 33/24b: "- - - Truth - - -". See 2/2b and 13/1g above and 40/75 below.

122 33/24c: “- - - Allah may reward the men of Truth (Muslims*) - - - and punish the Hypocrites if that be His Will - - -”. A sure way to always have an explanation: "If that be Allah’s will". And the same can explain any injustice Allah or Muhammad would not - or could not - rectify.

123 33/24d: "- - - if that be His (Allah's*) Will - - -”. See 14/19d above.

124 33/24e: "- - - Mercy - - -". See 2/2b above.

125 33/24f: "- - - Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful". See f.x. 1/1a or 33/5d above.

126 33/25a: "And Allah turned back the Unbelievers - - -". This refers to the battle of Medina - also called the Battle of the Trench. The Muslims had dud a deep and wide trench around the town. The attackers were unable to cross it under fire. Then there came cold and windy weather, and after some time the attackers gave in and left.

127 33/25b: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Non-Muslims - in this case Mecca and its helpers attacking Medina.

128 33/25c: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Non-Muslims - in this case Mecca and its helpers attacking Medina. A historical anomaly.

129 33/25d: "- - - Believers - - -". Muslims.

130 33/25e: "And Allah is Full of Strength, Able to enforce His Will". Why then has he not one single time showed so? Not one single time in all history has he clearly shown his power. Yahweh showed his power many a time according to the Bible - claims which are confirmed in the Quran in connections to some of the old Jewish prophets, included Jesus (though the Quran wrongly call Yahweh Allah in the Quran - the two are fundamentally too different to be the same). But Allah never one single time.

131 33/25f: "- - - to enforce His (Allah's*) Will". The thought-provoking fact here is that nothing provably came from Allah - and the Quran definitely did not come from any god. Was it Allah's will or Muhammad's will?

132 33/26a: "And those of the people of the Book (in this case the Jews in and around Medina*) who aided them (Muhammad accused these Jews of helping his enemies*) - Allah did take then down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts". Not Allah, but Muhammad attacked and conquered their villages. The first ones were chased away because one of the Arab tribes refused Muhammad to kill and enslave them. Later - when he was military stronger - the later victims fared worse (see 33/26b).

133 33/26b: "And those of the people of the Book (in this case the Jews in and around Medina*) who aided them (Muhammad accused these Jews of helping his enemies*) - - -2. A historical anomaly.

134 33/26c: "And those of the people of the Book (in this case the Jews in and around Medina*) who aided them (Muhammad accused these Jews of helping his enemies*) - - -". It is clear that they stayed out of the fighting. We have not found reliable proof for that they acted against the Muslims. But they represented intellectual and religious - and thus political - opposition, and he wanted to get rid of that. The first psychological moment came after the defeat at Uhud - he needed a "victory", and riches to the followers would give them other things to think about. And then after "the Battle of the Trench" ha was strong enough to finish off - in the horrible meaning of the word - the last strong opposition. We may add that if the behavior of the Muslims during the mass murders of the men from Qurayza tribe - the last big Jewish tribe in Medina - is correctly described, it tells a lot about what kind of people it was who followed Muhammad and brought him to power.

**135 33/26d: “And those of the People of the Book (the Jews of the Quraiza tribe - see above*) who had aided them - Allah did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror in their hearts. (So that) some ye (the Muslims/Muhammad) slew, and some ye made prisoners.” Very simple and “good and lawful” - to quote another verse - mass murdering, enslavement, rape, and robbery. The same happened to most of the ones who earlier had been chased away from Medina, but not fled far enough - the ones who had stopped in Khaybar had men killed and the women and children raped and enslaved. Allah is good and benevolent and gave the Arabs much loot and many slaves to and use in other ways. Muslims - not even today - never reflected over that to steal and rape and enslave and murder you had to ruin and destroy the lives of other humans. This fact is never mentioned by "the religion of peace", never reflected on, never compared to ethics or moral or sympathy or empathy in any Islamic media or publication we have met or heard about.

Well, on thinking it over we are wrong - it is compared to the Quran's moral code: The Quran clearly says "it is lawful and good". Which tells a lot about the religion.

A good and loving god and a peaceful religion - and this was far from the only pogrom in Muslim countries through the times. But it is typical that Allah sanctified the attack only afterwards. (Perhaps except Khaybar - if Muhammad told the truth).

136 33/26e: "- - - the People of the Book - - -". A name used in the Quran - and by Muslims - for Jews, Christians, and Sabeans (likely the people from Saba/Sabah/Sheba in what is now Yemen). "The Book" in this case is the Bible.

137 33/26f: "- - - the People of the Book who aided them (they were accused of aiding Mecca*) - - -". See 33/12c above.

#138 33/26g: "- - - some (the Jewish men and male youths*) ye (Muslim's*) slew, and some (= the Jewish women and children) ye made prisoners." The word "slave" is a loaded word today - and Muslims not always 100% honest. Muhammad did not make them prisoners, but slaves, and he sold and gave them away. Muhammad also personally raped first Rayhana bint Amr, and when Khaybar finally was taken a couple of years later, Safijja bint Huayay - Safiyya was 17, and married very shortly before - and Muhammad raped her after he had tortured her husband Kinana to death (he lit a fire on his chest, let it burn till Kinana was practically dead, and then beheaded him - he believed Kinana knew about hidden money Muhammad wanted to steal). We do not know if he raped more women - or children - but the casual way his men reacted to the rapes, may indicate something. Muslims are very right: Muhammad is a moral idol for Muslims - Islam after all is a war religion.

139 33/27a: (Continued from 33/26 above): "And He (Allah*) made you heirs of their land, their houses, their goods, and of land ye had not frequented (before) - - -". Muhammad "on the war-path" stole everything - in this case also their homes and land - - - in addition to making the women and children slaves and murdering the men (some 700 men and youths).

140 33/27b: “And He (Allah*) made you heirs of their land, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things”. Some rich spoils of war can justify much, and quiet many a man’s conscience - especially when a god sanctifies it. Could such things happen today or in the future? - we do not mention names like Darfur or Indonesia or East Timor or the Turks against Christian underlings around 1900 AD - f.x. in Armenia and Smyrna. It is accepted in the Quran as "lawful and good" and the Quran cannot be changed - a fact those forget who talks about liberalizing Islam. If Islam gains the upper hand, things like this may happen again, as it is part of the Quran's unchangeable and partly immoral moral code.

141 33/27c: ""And Allah hath power over all things". Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved. Allah also sometimes is used - like here - to justify immoral, injustice, and inhumanities.

142 33/28a: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god. But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

143 33/28b: “O Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

144 33/28c: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)! Say to thy Consorts - - -". Allah frequently took part in the private life of Muhammad - via a book may be made before the universe was made (13.7 billion years ago) and in any case revered by Allah and his angels as the "Mother Book" (13/39, 43/4, 85/21-22). Believe it if you want - if it is true, it is a 1000% (one thousand %) proof for that no living being ever had a trace of free will throughout the billions of years, and that physicians are wrong about things like chaos and entropy - some of the most basic elements of physics.

145 33/28d: “- - - thy (Muhammad's*) Consorts - - -". A historical anomaly.

146 33/28-29: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)! Say to thy Consorts: ‘If it be that ye desire the life of this World, and its glitter – then come! I will provide for your enjoyment and set you free in a handsome manner. But if ye seek Allah and His Messenger, and the Home of the Hereafter, verily, Allah has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward”. Muhammad had his women problems – and Allah (?) helped him – this is not the only time. Look at this text, take into account the intense religious fervor of Medina at that time, the impression and one-mindedness that is the normal effect on people in intense, one-sided religious hotspots – Islam is just not the only one through history or resent history - plus the naivety that follows lack of education and one-sided propaganda, plus the fact that the women knew what they had, but had every reason to fear the future if they were alone in a society with small possibilities for earning their own living, and in a society where they would forever be stamped for leaving “the Prophet” if they were “set free” - - - there is no doubt that Muhammad knew his psychology and people. He used one of the age-old strategies the powerful and resourceful through ages has used, and uses, to manipulate his surroundings – included his women. And at places in the Quran he is backed up by his god – is that really a task for a god? – and is it something that belongs in a “Mother Book” revered by the omniscient and omnipotent god in his Heaven? (And if man – and women – has free will, so that the future is not locked – how could these details be written in the book billions of years before it happened? – that could only be done if man and animals all are puppets on a string totally without a free will.)

Muhammad was intelligent and manipulating.

And to the degree this story could be a model for others, this was how life were and is for Muslim women for all future, for Muhammad was and is the great idol and moral ideal.

Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proven efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god is very normal.

147 33/28-33a: This about Muhammad's wives and rules to make them stay quiet and satisfied - double punishment and double reward, etc., and other places in the Quran forbidden to remarry, ordered to talk from behind a curtain, his daughter Fatime promised a top position in Heaven, etc. contradicts the Bible in that such rules were not given to any of the Biblical prophets The same god would give at least somewhat similar rules to all his representatives - which he did to all the Biblical prophets, but not to Muhammad. Muhammad even had permission to rape women (f. ex. Rayhana bint Amr and Safiyya bint Huayay), an absolutely NO for all other prophets. Very clear indications for that Muhammad did not belong to the same line of prophets as the Biblical prophets, and did not get his claimed revelations from the same god. Too different rules.

148 33/28-33b: One question: Do private stuff like this belong in a holy book?

149 33/29a: "- - - Allah and His Messenger - - -". Standard mantra for Muhammad to glue himself to his platform of power; his god.

150 33/29b: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

151 33/29c: "- - - His (Allah's*) Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

152 33/29d: "- - - the Home of the Hereafter - - -". The Quran's and Islam’s paradise. See 10/9f above.

153 33/29e: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

154 33/29f: "- - - Allah has prepared - - -". Impossible unless he exists.

155 33/29g: "- - - well-doers - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is relative to the book's own partly immoral moral code. Compared to the one and fundamental "constitution" of all moral all ethics and of moral and ethical rules: "Do unto others like you want others to do unto you", the Quran's - and thus Islam's - moral code is unethical and immoral a number of places, even horrible some places. (F. x. the best deeds were raids and wars in the name of Allah - most of them in reality for riches, slaves and power. Muslims defends this with that such behviour only is premitted during jihad - holy war. But that is no defence - doing it in the name of the god in reality makes stealing, rape, enslavement, torture, and murder, etc. even more despiceable).

156 33/29h: "- - - a great reward (Paradise*)". If Allah exists. If Allah is behind the Quran. If the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth. Also see 10/9f and 13/1g above and 40/75 below.

157 33/30a: “O Consorts of the Prophet! - - -". Historical anomalies.

158 33/30b: “O Consorts of the Prophet! If any of you were guilty of evident unseemly conduct, the Punishment would be doubled for her, and that is easy for Allah”. For comments see 33/28-29 above – and also note that the god is easy to use, for Muhammad like for many self centered human manipulators in societies where religion is a dominant presence.

Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god is typical for many such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – and hence the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life - we include it also in the chapter about women’s life under Islam.

This strong warning also means that Muhammad did not trust his women too much - his reaction to Aishah's "adventure" proves the same.

159 33/30c: “- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

160 33/30d: "- - - and that is easy for Allah". One of the very many claims in the Quran which never was or is proved.

161 33/31a: “But if any of you is devout in the service of Allah and His Messenger (also to solve such problems he glues himself to his platform of power – the god*), and works righteousness – to her shall We (Allah*) grant her reward twice: and We have prepared for her a generous sustenance.”

As said above: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proven efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god, is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but all what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – and hence the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life - for everybody and for all times.

33/30+31 together make a case of "the stick and the carrot" - presumable from Allah. But does private details from the claimed prophet's wives' and other women's private life belong in a holy book delivered by a god?

162 33/31b: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". Muhammad's standard mantra to glue himself to his god and platform of power. Besides: A man preaching a tale full of mistakes, partly immoral moral code, etc., is he the messenger of a god?

163 33/31c: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A time anomaly.

164 33/31d: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

165 33/31e: "- - - works righteousness - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

166 33/31f: "- - - We (Allah*) have prepared for her (any of Muhammad's wives and other women*) a generous Sustenance (in Paradise*)". Also for the wives of Muhammad parts of the reward were promises of a nice next life - - - if Allah and his paradise exist. And if not Muhammad had his pleasure for cheap money.

167 33/32a: “O Consorts of the Prophet! - - -". Historical anomalies.

168 33/32b: “O Consorts of the Prophet! If any of you were guilty of evident unseemly conduct, the Punishment would be doubled for her, and that is easy for Allah”. For comments see 33/28-29 above – and also note that the god is easy to use, for Muhammad like for many self centered human manipulators in societies where religion is a dominant presence.

Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god is typical for many such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – and hence the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life - we include it also in the chapter about women’s life under Islam.

This strong warning also means that Muhammad did not trust his women too much - his reaction to Aishah's "adventure" proves the same.

169 33/32c: “- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

170 33/32d: “O Consorts of the Prophet! Ye are not like any of the (other) women: if ye do fear (Allah), be not too complaisant of speech lest one in whose heart is disease should be moved with desire: but speak ye a speech (that is) just.

Once more: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god, is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – it is the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life. Here Muhammad puts extra pressure on his women to make sure they "behave".

Another question: Does Muhammad's private sex life and problems with all his women - married and not married - belong in a timeless holy "Mother Book" revered by the god and his angels in Heaven? And how come it could be reliably written in that book before the world was created, if Muhammad or his women or anybody else had free will and could change their minds and thus history?

171 33/32e: "- - - one in whose heart is disease - - -". A non-Muslim. One of Muhammad's many negative names for them (though in just this case he may have included bad Muslims).

172 33/32f: "- - - speech (that is) just". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral and judicial codes - remember f.x. al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), and Muhammad's view on cheating, betrayal and keeping words/promises/oaths.

173 33/33a: “And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger (!!*). And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye Members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless.” Yes, this is how the omnipotent, mighty god speaks to solve Muhammad's daily family life according to the revered "Mother Book" in his own home in his Heaven (of which the Quran is a copy, according to Islam).

As said before: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use of the god, is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – it is the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life. Allah orders Muhammad's wives to be good girls - a nice help for Muhammad. But is it a job for a god? - and is it text worthy a "Mother Book" that an omniscient god reveres - reveres - in his Heaven?

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not, many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

174 33/33b: "- - - your (Muhammad's women*) - - -". A historical anomaly

175 33/33c: "- - - the former Times of Ignorance - - -". It may be difficult to believe, but this is the Quran's and Islam's official name for the times before Islam. This in spite of the clear fact that many places in the now Islamic area were much better educated and had much more knowledge about many things before they were conquered by Islam, than 1 or 5 or 20 generations later - Islam destroyed many cultures, some of them advanced ones (but as they did not believe in Muhammad and his god, they were "ignorants", living in "the Times of Ignorance".

#176 33/33d: "- - - regular Prayer - - -". This demand for regular prayers - 5 times a day - was so essential for Allah (he even wanted more often according to Hadiths) that it became one of the 5 "pillars" of Islam. For Yahweh such formalism was so totally without any interest, that no similar rule - not even the idea - at all is mentioned in the entire Bible: Pray when there is a reason or a need or a wish. One of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

177 33/33e: "- - - give regular Charity - - -". As mentioned before the Quran's stressing the value of charity, is one of its (few?) positive aspects. And as also mentioned before this moral plus is diminished by the fact that the reason for giving charity, was to gain merit in Heaven, not because of empathy or sympathy with the needy ones, and that you gained the same merit in Heaven from helping your wife or child as from helping others - and then why help strangers? (Oh, it was done, but it was not too high on the priority list always).

178 33/33f: "- - - obey Allah and His Messenger - - -". A stronger version of Muhammad's standard mantra to glue himself to his platform of power, Allah.

179 33/33g: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A time anomaly.

180 33/33h: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

181 33/33i: "- - - Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you (Muhammad's women, included his wives*) - - -". Does this belong in a holy book sanctified and revered by a god?

182 33/33j: "- - - pure and spotless." Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

183 33/34a "- - - in your (Muhammad's women's) homes (they had one each*) - - -". The women are historical anomalies for everyone reading a copy of the timeless claimed "Mother Book" - like the Quran - before this took place. There are legion such anomalies in the Quran.

184 33/34b: "- - - Signs of Allah - - -". Wrong. There does not exist clear signs for Allah anywhere, inside or outside the Quran.

185 33/34c: “And recite - - - Allah and His Wisdom (= the Quran*) - - -“. There is limited wisdom in a book full of mistakes, and in addition: How to pick what is wisdom – if any – among all the mistakes, twisted words and logic, and even some outright lies?

186 33/34d: "- - - Allah understands the finest mysteries and is well acquainted with them". Why then f.x. 2/233h and 35/38b above.

187 33/35a: "- - - believing men and women - - -". Muslims.

188 33/35b: "- - - devout men and women - - -". Muslims.

189 33/35c: "- - - true - - -". See 2/2b above.

190 33/35d: "- - - give in Charity - - -". As mentioned before the Quran's stressing the value of charity, is one of its (few?) positive aspects. And as also mentioned before this moral plus is diminished by the fact that the reason for giving charity, was to gain merit in Heaven, not because of empathy or sympathy with the needy ones, and that you gained the same merit in Heaven from helping your wife or child as from helping others - and then why help strangers? (Oh, it was done, but it was not too high on the priority list always).

191 33/35e: (A36 – in 2008 edition A38): “- - - the men and women who fast (and deny themselves) - - -.” But is it only denying themselves what the fast demands? The Arab word “sa’im” really means “one who denies himself from or abstains from anything”. Then the meaning changes to: “- - - all the self-denying men and self-denying women - - -.” In a way the same, but the meaning is much wider. And these variants of course also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word(s) there has/have more than one meaning. Allah (?) really uses a clear language.

192 33/35f: "- - - for them (good Muslims*) has Allah prepared forgiveness - - -". Allah can forgive nobody unless he exists and is a god (well, may be also if he belongs to the dark forces, but it is questionable what value the forgiveness in case has).

193 33/35g: "- - - for them (good Muslims*) has Allah prepared - - - a great reward". If he exists and is a major god, and if he is like described in the Quran. Also see 10/9f above.

#####194 33/36a: "It is not fitting for a Believer (Muslim*) - - - when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision - - -". Full control - absolute power - no thinking, only obedience. The ultimate dream for any dictator. One extra point here is that in reality it was Muhammad who made the decisions here on Earth - not even Muhammad claimed he got all details dictated from Allah. And the final touch: No god dictated the Quran - too much mistakes, contradictions, etc. - then who in reality dictated here that one should obey among others - and the only one on Earth - Muhammad absolutely blindly?

195 33/36b: "It is not fitting for a Believer (Muslim*) - - - when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision - - -". (YA3721): "We (Muslims*) must not put our own wisdom in competition with Allah's wisdom." If a Muslim knows something is wrong in the Quran, he shall all the same believe what the Quran says(!!). No comment - and not a single one necessary!!

196 33/36c: "- - - a Believer - - -". A Muslim.

197 33/36d: "- - - by Allah and His Messenger - - -". Muhammad's standard mantra to glue himself to his platform of power; his god.

198 33/36e: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A time anomaly.

199 33/36f: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

200 33/36g: "- - - (if) anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." With so much wrong in the teaching/the Quran, at least it is wrong that they clearly are on a wrong path. Another point: Women does not count enough in Islam to be mentioned here.

201 33/36h: "- - - (if) anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." In plain words: If anyone here on Earth disobeys Muhammad, he will end in Hell. The ultimate dictatorship.

202 33/36i: "- - - disobeys Allah and His Messenger - - -". Dangerous.

203 33/37a: This verse does not at all belong in any holy book - this is solving of Muhammad's family affairs. (Muhammad fell in love - or in desire - with the wife of his adopted son, Zaid. According to old Arab law an adopted son was a son, and a father-in-law could not marry his daughter-in-law. But Allah changed the law for Muhammad, there was a divorce - what could Zaid say against his mighty "father"? (Muslims claim the marriage was not a good one - that be as it may, it anyhow was a betrayal of Zaid, and even most Muslims do not feel entirely well about this marriage) - - - and Muhammad had himself yet another wife. Also see 33/37 just below.

204 33/37b: "- - - didst thou (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

205 33/37c: "- - - one who had received the grace of Allah and thy (Muhammad's*) favor - - -". This refers to Muhammad's adopted son Zaid bin Harithah. Muhammad became interested in his wife, and with some help from Allah (?) he got her.

206 33/37d: "- - - one who had received the grace of Allah and thy (Muhammad's*) favor - - -". This refers to Zaid - Muhammad's adopted son. A historical anomaly.

207 33/37e: "- - - thou (Muhammad*) didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah - - -". This easily - oh, so easily - could be hypocrisy.

208 33/37f: "- - - We (Allah*) joined her (Zaid's wife Zainab*) in marriage to thee - - -" Historical anomalies.

209 33/37g: "- - - We (Allah*) joined her (Zaid's wife Zainab*) in marriage to thee (Muhammad*): in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marrying with the wives of their adopted sons (after divorce - widows not mentioned*)". This is perhaps the thinnest excuse we have ever heard for a serious selfish deed.

For one thing: Is this a situation which happens so often that it merits a dramatic demonstration?

For another: Many a doubter would be willing to bet that if Muhammad had not been "hot" on this woman, this old Arab law - forbidden to marry your adopted son's former wife - had existed today.

For a third and the main point: A verse from Allah had had JUST the same effect.

Hypocrisy.

210 33/37h: "And Allah's command must be fulfilled". If he is a god and exists, this is a matter of course. But how to know what are Allah's demands, when it is clear that the Quran is not from Allah? - no god makes that many mistakes, contradictions, etc.

###211 33/37i: "And Allah's command must be fulfilled". In this case pure hypocrisy. And this may be a main reason for many Muslims' bad feeling about this story - the hypocrisy is too obvious.

212 33/38a: "There can be no difficulty to the Prophet in what Allah has indicated him to do (here: To marry Zaid's wife Zainab)". Anyone able to believe Muhammad married her because it was a duty, are permitted to do so - but it will tell a lot about their brain. Also see 33/37i just above.

213 33/38b: “- - - the Prophet - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

214 33/38c: “- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” A historical anomaly.

215 33/38d: "- - - what Allah has indicated to him (Muhammad*) as a duty (to marry Zaynab*) - - -". More too easy to see hypocrisy. See 33/37g+i above.

216 33/38e: "It was the practice (approved) of by Allah amongst (earlier prophets*) - - -" - - - to obey Allah. The same comment as to 33/38d just above.

217 33/39a: For the total of this verse: See 33/38d above.

218 33/39b: "- - - the Messages (the Quran*) of Allah - - -". No god sent down a book of a quality like the Quran - a thought provoking fact also for Muhammad's marriage to Zaynab.

#########219 33/39c: "And enough is Allah to call (men) to account." This is a sentence in the Quran Muslims have forgotten - and keeps forgetting - when they punish humans for religious or religiously related mistakes or "crimes". And this even is a relatively late surah. Are they sinning or is this sentence abrogated? (We may here remind you that many Muslims denies the rule of abrogation, as abrogations are profs for that the god has to correct earlier mistakes - which in case are more proofs for that Allah makes mistakes.

220 33/40a: "Muhammad is not the farther of any of your men - - -". Muhammad had no son who lived (and only one daughter, Fatima, who survived him, and just by half a year (some ones have asked if this was a punishment for his sins)).

221 33/40b: "Muhammad - - -". A historical anomaly.

222 33/40c: "(Muhammad is*) the Messenger of Allah". No god sends a messenger bringing so much wrong information.

223 33/40d: "(Muhammad is*) the Messenger of Allah". A variety of Muhammad's standard slogan to glue himself to his platform of power, his god.

224 33/40e: “(Muhammad was*) the Seal of the Prophets - - -.” Muhammad was no real prophet - a messenger or an apostle for something or someone perhaps, but no real prophet. See 33/28a above and 33/45 below:

225 33/40f: "- - - the Seal of the Prophets - - -." See 33/40c just above: How could Muhammad be the seal of the prophets (the last and greatest prophet), when he in reality was not a real prophet? – he neither had, nor pretended to have, nor claimed to have the gift of prophesying!!! Also See 33/28a above and 33/45 below.

226 33/40g: “- - - Allah has full knowledge of all things.” The Quran proves this is not true – lots of mistakes, etc. Or maybe it is not Allah that made the Quran? But it is an often repeated warning in the Quran - do not try to cheat, because Allah knows everything (well, it was not only bad, because he also saw the good things - both the whip and the carrot). Also see 2/23h above.

227 33/41a: "- - - ye who believe - - -". The Muslims.

228 33/41b: "Celebrate the praise of Allah - - -". Please read 1/1a and see if you think he deserves it - if he exists.

229 33/42: "And glorify him (Allah*) morning and evening." Please read 1/1a and see if you think he deserves it - if he exists.

230 33/43a: "He (Allah*) is it Who sends blessings on you - - -". Allah cannot send blessings on anyone unless he exists and in addition is a god.

231 33/43b: "- - - His (Allah's*) angels - - -". Allah has no angels unless he exists and is a god (we have seen no angels of Iblis/the Devil in the Quran*).

232 33/43c: "- - - He (Allah*) may bring you out from the depths of Darkness into Light - - -". Well, not by means of a book so full of errors and immoral moral like the Quran.

233 33/43d: "- - - He (Allah*) is full of Mercy to the Believers". There never was a god of a war religion who really was full of mercy even towards his believers. Also see 1/1a above.

234 33/43e: "- - - Believers - - -". Muslims.

235 33/44a: "- - - the Day they meet Him (Allah*) - - -". The Day of Doom.

236 33/44b: "He (Allah*) has prepared for them (good Muslims*) a generous Reward". Impossible for Allah unless he exists and is something supernatural - white or dark.

237 33/44c: "- - - a generous Reward". Here intended to mean the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

***238 33/45a: “O Prophet (Muhammad)! - - -“. But was Muhammad really a prophet? A prophet is a person that has the gift of being able to make distinct prophesies – and does it. Then there is the difference between the real and the false prophet – because there were lots of false prophets, as it was (and still is) an easy way to make a good living if you are clever. According to the Bible the distinction between a real prophet and a false one, is that the real prophet made prophesies and they came true, whereas what the false ones make of prophesies do not come true (except sometimes by coincidence). Muhammad did not even try to make prophesies or pretend he could make such. There are a few times where what he said happened to come true by coincidence – and were remembered by his followers just because it came true, whereas what he said that did not come true, were not remembered. It is like that with each and every human being; we say and we talk so much, that sometimes something has got to be correct now and then – In Scandinavia they even have a special expression for it: To “gaa troll i ord” – which means something like a troll makes your words come true – but it has no implication of you being clairvoyant or a prophet. Muhammad did not even try to make real prophesies – one of the tree absolute requirements for being a prophet. (And then he did not even test the second requirement: Did his prophesies mostly/always come true?) He simply was too smart to try to show off with things he knew he was unable to do. And then of course he also lacked the other requirements: Prophesies that came true, and prophesies as a part of his mission. Muhammad simply had none of the three requirements for being a prophet:

Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

Muhammad simply was no prophet – he did not have that gift. He just stole or “borrowed” a distinguished title. As a prophet he only was an impostor – an eloquent leader, but unable to do what makes you a prophet: To make prophesies – and prophesies that regularly come true.

***He may have been a messenger, if it is true he had a message. But no prophet. (Islam likes to tell that to be a messenger is something much more than being a prophet. But to be a prophet, you have to have special gifts, whereas to be a messenger simply means that you more or less passively bring messages from one place to another – an errand boy.) But another question in case is: A messenger boy for whom? – for himself? – for other humans? – for some dark forces? Two things are 100% sure:

*He was not a messenger boy for any omniscient god – too many mistakes, contradictions, twisted arguments and as twisted logic, etc. in the Quran.

**He in any case was not a messenger boy for any good or benevolent god – too much stealing, hate, discrimination and inhumanity, not to mention rape, blood, extortion, suppression, enslavement, murder and war. (It is said that Muhammad just was another robber baron and warlord – no worse than other robber barons and warlords living from stealing, extortion and slave trading in those hard times. That may be true. But he definitely was no better than the others, too – and he should have been much better than all the others if he represented a good and benevolent god). His behavior and his real message from all the years in Medina prove far beyond any doubt that if he represented a god, it was so absolutely not a good god. Also cheating and lying and breaking even one’s oats, are the hallmarks of a cheat and a deceiver and a swindler – and of a dark god or worse.

All the mistaken facts in the Quran that are in accordance with wrong “science” in Arabia (mainly from old Greece and Persia) at the time of Muhammad, clearly indicates that the Quran is made by one or more humans there and then. But if there was a god involved, the inhuman surahs from Medina most clearly show he definitely was not a good one. - - - But may be a devil in disguise?

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

239 33/45b: “O Prophet (Muhammad)! - - -“. A time anomaly.

240 33/45c: "Truly - - -". In a book with so much wrong like the Quran, nothing can be called "truly" unless it is proved. Also see 2/2b above.

241 33/45d: “Truly We (Allah*) have sent thee (Muhammad*) - - -“. Muhammad was not sent by Allah if Allah was a good god – his (Muhammad’s*) teachings were too bloody and too inhuman to represent a good god (but they made a good platform of power for Muhammad). He also was not sent from any omniscient god - too much is wrong, included wrong facts, in the Quran. See also 33/45a just above.

242 33/45e: "- - - a Witness - - -". In normal speech this is a word only used about persons from whom one demands truth and only the truth. All the errors in the Quran, included some clear lies, proves that the word does not belong in this verse - and in some others.

243 33/45f: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -“. Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for the ones not suppressed and those of them who could rob and steal and rape and become rich – and really glad only for the ones near the top of the pyramid. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the minor percent of people that needs a religion to lean on (the exact percentage is not known, but science indicates 5 – 10 %, though some more in difficult times.) In Islam these small percents have usurped all the power and force everybody not only to live, but also to think and believe like themselves.

244 33/45g: "(Muhammad was*) a Warner - - -". At this time (625-629 AD) Muhammad no longer was only a warner - he had started also to become an enforcer, and much of Arabia and the rest of the Muslim area was made Muslim by means of the sword or by milder pressure backed by the sword.

245 33/46: “(Muhammad be*) as a lamp spreading light.” Did Muhammad spread most light or most darkness? A rhetoric question needing no answer.

246 33/47a: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -“. See 33/45a and 33/45c above.

247 33/47b: "- - - Believers - - -". Muslims.

248 33/47c: "- - - they (good Muslims*) shall have from Allah a very great Bounty". You find similar claims here and there in the Quran, not one of them is documented or in other ways proved fulfilled. Many claims, but not one proved case.

249 33/47d: "- - - a very great Bounty". The Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

250 33/48a: “And obey not (the behest) of the Unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and heed not their annoyances, but put thy Trust in Allah.” This may be seen as comforting and a pep-talk to Muhammad’s followers against the still strong non-Muslims, or as an advice not to mind the meanings of the non-Muslims too much and, not to take too much offence from what they said and did. If it is meant to cool down the strife between Muslims and non-Muslims in Medina, it is one of the last such verses, as it came in 627 AD or a little later – around the attack and obliteration of Khaybar or somewhat later, (but before the final symbol of the Muslims’ taking over the power; the conquest of Mecca) – and before some of the harshest verses like “The Verse of the Sword”, 9/5, which most likely came in 631 AD.

251 33/48b: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

252 33/48c: "- - - put thy (Muslims'*) Trust in Allah". How is that possible when there is no proof neither for Allah's claimed existence, for his claimed being a god or for his claimed power, especially as the claims on top of all come from a book full of mistakes, dictated by a man of very doubtful moral but with a strong liking for power, for riches for bribes for more power, and for women?

253 33/48d: "For enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs". If he exists, if he is a god, and if the Quran has told the full truth and only the truth about him.

#254 33/48e: "For enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs". Muslims - who are presumed to really believe in the Quran - should remember this before using inhuman punishment for religious mistakes or sins.

255 33/49a "- - - ye who believe - - -". Muslims.

256 33/49b: “When you marry believing women, and then divorce them before ye have touched them, no period of Iddah have ye to count in respect of them: so give them a present.” As mentioned further up: Marriage may be quite a casual affair in Islam. And note that the information about not having to wait before the next man is permitted, is given to the (formal) husband or to men in general, not to the woman. This is a religion centered on the men and warriors.

257 33/49c: “When you marry believing women, and then divorce them before ye have touched them, no period of Iddah (waiting*) have ye to count in respect of them: so give them a present.” Compare the Quran's rules for divorce to f. x. Matt. 10/5-12. Yahweh and Allah the same god? Jesus and Muhammad in the same line of anything? Do not ask stupid questions. The laws concerning divorce is one of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - by far too - and too fundamentally - different.

258 33/49d: “When you marry believing women, and then divorce them before ye have touched them, no period of Iddah have ye to count in respect of them: so give them a present.” Part of the basis under the sharia laws.

259 33/49e: "- - - Iddah - - -". Waiting period without sex for the woman, to be sure one knows who the father is if there is a pregnancy.

260 33/50a: “O, Prophet! - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

261 33/50b: “O, Prophet (Muhammad*)! - - -.” A historical anomaly.

262 33/50c: “O Prophet! We (Allah*) have made lawful (for sex*) to thee (it is not unusual that the god "permits" this towards the founder of a religion or a sect – it happens not infrequently*) thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers: and those to whom thy right hand possesses out of the spoils of war (which was quite a huge number*) whom Allah has assigned to thee; and the daughters of thy parental uncles and aunts, and the daughters of maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makkah (= Mecca*)) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her – this is only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); we know that We have appointed for them (permitted sex*) as to their wives and those whom their right hands possess – in order that there should be no difficulty for thee.” As for slaves, a huge number passed through Muhammad’s hands – perhaps 2000 or more only from the Qyrayza tribe. We do not know if and in case how many of them he personally raped, except Rayhana bint Amr and Safiyya bint Huayay (which we know about because the first later became one of his concubines, and the other one of his wives), but the casual way and the minimal fuzz with which two rapes happened and made, makes it easy to think that they neither were the first, nor the only ones – to rape ones captives and slaves was (and formally still is) completely ok in Islam. That just was the way life was/is for slave women and captive women under Islam.

And once more: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use or disuse of the god, is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam, it became the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life under Islam.

###263 33/50d: "- - - We (Allah*) have made lawful for you (Muhammad and Muslims*) - - - those whom thy right possesses (= your slaves*) out of the spoils of war - - -". This plainly tells that Muslims are permitted to rape any female captive of war (and remember all wars in reality are named jihad, so Muslims cannot explain that it only is for jihads - and honestly it is quite a god who says: "When you fight for me - or at least your leaders claim you are - you are permitted to rape any female child (at least if she is 9 years or older - Muhammad's start of sex with Aisha), girl, woman or married not pregnant woman you come across if you just can call her your captive. But just look at armed conflicts the last couple of generations included Bangladesh and Eritrea - that is just what even regular Muslim armies have practiced - with inhuman examples in Bangladesh, where the hundreds of thousands of or more rape victims even were fellow Muslims (We have read that in Bangladesh there after that war was born some 200ooo illegitimate children from the rapes. This in case means a few million cases of rape of fellow Muslim girls and women. On average each Pakistanis soldier in case made several rapes.) This sentence tells more about reality in the Islamic moral code and about the benevolence of Allah, than all the nice claims about such things in the Quran combined - acts and rules showing reality, always are more reliable than nice claims. And honestly: To do it in the name of their god makes the deeds even more disgusting, and tells a lot about the real Allah - - - if he exists.

###264 33/50e: "- - - We (Allah*) have made lawful (for sex/rape)for you (Muhammad and Muslims*) - - - those whom thy right possesses (= your slaves*) out of the spoils of war - - -". "Do unto others like you want others do unto you".

There are other moral rules in Islam which are worse and more immoral, but this is the one we find most repulsive - this one and the one permitting sex with/rape of children.

265 33/50f: "(Muhammad may have for a wife*) any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet (Muhammad') - - -". The literally correct translation according to M. Azad (A33/59 - A33/60 in the English 2008 edition): "if she offered herself as a gift (Arab: "in wahabat nafsaha") to the Prophet (Muhammad*)". Here is an interesting piece of information: Most Muslim commentators take this to mean "without demanding or expecting a dower". The dower was and is an integrated part of the Muslim formalities of a wedding. Here it seems that also here Muhammad god special treatment from Allah: Cheap wives. This in addition to that he could take a prisoner of war, make her slave, marry her and "give" her her freedom - except from her new husband - as a dower. Muhammad did this at least with Safiyya bint Huayay - a very cheap wife, as the dower cost him nothing.

266 33/50g: “- - - to the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” See 33/50a above.

267 33/50h: “- - - if the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” See 33/50a above.

268 33/50i: "- - - this (the permission for a nearly unlimited number of women - he had at least 36 (not some 11 like Muslims often mention - those only were his long-time wives) is only for thee (Muhammad*) - - -". Special rules for self proclaimed prophets far from are unheard of in fringe sects and religions - like Islam was at that time. Normally they have turned out in the end to be false prophets.

269 33/50j: "And Allah is Oft-Forgiving - - -". Allah can forgive no-one unless he exists and in addition is a god.

270 33/50k: "And Allah is - - - Most Merciful". As said many times before: Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Islamic moral code, and the immoral parts of sharia - and the remark just above this one - and see if you agree.

271 33/50-52: Some serious questions: These verses - 33/50-52 - are about how many women Muhammad was permitted to have and have sex with - nearly any woman and more or less as many as he wanted for marriage plus any not pregnant captive or slave girl or woman. And like some other founders of sects and religions there were special rules for this and that for himself. Does this really belong in a holy book - a book which is a copy of the claimed "mother book" which is revered by the god and his angels in Heaven (13/39b, 43/4, 85/21-22)? And how does this compare with the real prophets in the Bible - the ones he claims to be in the same line of? (Remember that in the Bible men like David and Solomon are not reckoned among the prophets, but among the kings.) And finally: How does rape/forced sex with captive or slave women compare with NT's view of rules for sex?

Yahweh and Allah the same god? Perhaps - if he is strongly schizophrenic.

272 33//51a: "Thou (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

#273 33//51b: "Thou (Muhammad*) mayest defer (the turn of (for sex*)) any of them (Muhammad's women - wives and slaves*) that thou pleasest, and thou mayest receive any (of his women for sex*) thou pleasest: and there is no blame on thee if thou invite one whose (turn (for sex with Muhammad*)) thou hadst set aside". Honestly what has this to do in a claimed holy book for all times, a book which is claimed to be a copy of the claimed "Mother Book" in Heaven - a "Mother Book" all the may be 124ooo or more claimed earlier prophets got their copies of (but a claimed "Mother Book" not giving the same rights to the 124ooo claimed earlier prophets who Muhammad claimed were in the same line of prophets as himself), and a "Mother Book" claimed revered by the god and his angels in Heaven. What kind of god reveres texts like this - a sex freak?

274 33/51c: “Thou (Muhammad*) mayst defer (the turn (of having sex*) of) any of them that thou pleasest, and thou mayst receive any thou pleasest (for your bed/sex*): and there is no blame on thee if thou invite one whose (turn) thou hast set aside.” It is the man’s wish and pleasure which counts, and here this fact is confirmed by the almighty god in his "Mother Book" of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy – though written only to Muhammad and nothing similar is said in that book to any of the thousands of former prophets (124ooo ?) or to ordinary men. But as Muhammad is the great idol, this like everything he (or Allah?) said and did was and is the correct thing to do if nothing special is said that prohibits it.

Once more: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use or disuse of the god is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam – it is the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life.

275 33/51d: (A33/61 - A33/62 in the English 2008 edition): "Thus, the Prophet (Muhammad*) was told (by Allah*) that he need not observe a strict "rotation" in the conjugal attentions due to his wives - - -". Really some stuff for a "holy" book - and for 124ooo earlier prophets who had gotten copies of the claimed "Mother Book". Not to mention an interesting text in the "Mother Book" from which the Quran is copied, for Allah to revere in his Heaven.

276 33/51e: "- - - Allah knows (all) that is in your hearts - - -". Why then 2/233h above?

277 33/51f: "- - - Allah is All-Knowing - - -". Not if he made the Quran - too many mistaken facts, etc.

###278 33/51g: "- - - Allah is All-Knowing - - -". How can it then be possible he does not know that to be made a slave is destroying for the life of any human? - and how can it be possible that he does not know that to be raped is destroying for the life of a woman - not to mention a child?. Or does he know, but does not care as long as his warriors and terrorists get money and pleasure and power?

279 33/51h: "- - - Allah is - - - Most Forbearing". See 1/1a above and see if you agree.

280 33/52a: “It is not lawful for thee (Muhammad*) (to marry more) women after this - - - except any thy right hand should possess - - -”. Slave women did not count, so Muhammad still had a way out if he wanted more women.

281 33/52b: “- - - for thee (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

282 33/52c: (A64 – in 2008 edition A65): “It is not for thee (Muhammad*) (to marry more) women after this - - -.” Does this relate to no more than the 4 categories women that he in verse 52 was told were lawful for him? Or does it refer to all women – except slaves? Islam tends to believe the last, but f. ex. Tabari said the first. And no-one will ever know. Clear language? (This verse is from 629 AD or later according to Islam - it has to be, as he married his last wives, Maymuna bint al-Harith, in February 629 AD, and Safiyya bint Huayay around the same time, and if the verse is older, he broke the rule of the Quran on this point). Muhammad then was nearly 60. May be he felt the pressure from having to satisfy a dozen wives and concubines?) plus short-time wives and women one does not know if he was married to or not. (Muhammad over the years had 11 wives, 2 concubines, 16 short-time wives and 7 with unclear status known by name = 36 all together which are known by name.) All the same some Muslim scholars believe this verse is from 627 AD - before he married Zainab. Not good in case.

283 33/52d: "- - - Allah doth watch over all things". Perhaps - if he exists and is something supernatural, white or dark.

284 33/53a: "- - - ye who believe - - -". Muslims.

285 33/53b: "Enter not the Prophet's (Muhammad's*) house - - -". Special rules for Muhammad here, too. Not uncommon for self proclaimed prophets in many a sect/emerging religion, like Islam was at that time.

286 33/53c: “- - - the Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet was a person who could see at least parts of the unseen, and thus a person who:

Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.

Makes prophesies which always or at least mostly come true.

Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for any person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said which did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens if it is nothing spectacular). But he did not guess the future correctly often - actually he statistically and according to the laws of probability should have "hit the mark" far more often by sheer chance than he did - there just are a few cases where Muslims will claim he foretold something correctly, and few if any of them are "perfect hits". But then the Quran makes it pretty clear that even though he was intelligent, he had little fantasy, and that he also was nearly unable to make innovative thinking (nearly all his tales and his ideas in reality were "borrowed" ones - though often twisted to fit his new religion).

The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, that he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying - of "seeing the unseen" - that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2 above), and finally that both he and Islam said and says that Muhammad was unable to see the unseen (extra revealing here is that the old Biblical title for a prophet, was "a seer" - one who saw the unseen (f.x. 1. Sam. 9/9)) and also that Islam even today admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” (prophesying is a kind of miracle - seeing what has not yet happened). (This fact that Islam admits there were no miracles connected to Muhammad "except the revelation of the Quran" also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in the Hadiths, are made up stories - but all the same many a mullah and imam and scholar use these stories, which Islam admits are made up ones, as "proofs" for that Muhammad had supernatural powers and was a prophet. Honesty is not the strong side of Muslim religious leaders.) Also see 30/40a and 30/46a, and we also should add that his favorite wife (and infamous child wife) Aishah according to Hadiths (f.x. Al-Bukhari) stated that anyone saying Muhammad could foresee things, were wrong.

Verse 7/188b also is very relevant here: "If I (Muhammad*) had knowledge of the Unseen (= what is hidden or what has not happened yet*), I should have - - -". IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD DID NOT HAVE THE PROPHETS' ABILITY TO SEE "THE UNSEEN" - he was no real prophet. Similar in 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c+d, 10/49a+b, and 72/26. 

As mentioned: Also relevant here is that the original title of the Jewish prophets as mentioned was not "prophet" but "seer" - one who saw at least parts of the unseen. (F.x. 1. Sam. 9/9#, 1. Sam. 9/11, 1. Sam. 9/18, 1. Sam. 9/19, 2. Kings. 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 1. Chr. 26/28, 1. Chr. 29/29, 2. Chr. 9/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 2. Chr.16/10, 2. Chr. 19/2, 2. Chr. 29/25, Amos 7/12, Mic. 3/7 - some places the two titles even are used side by side). Muhammad thus so definitely was no seer - prophet - even according to his own words; he had no "knowledge of the unseen". One more proof for that he was not in the same line - not to say league - as Jesus, if the Bible and/or the Quran tell the truth about Jesus on this point.

Many liked - and like - the title prophet, and there have been made other definitions for this title - the most common of these are "one who brings messages from a god", or "one who represents a god", or "one who acts/talks on behalf of a god". But the fact remains: Without being able to prophesy, he or she is no real prophet. A messenger for someone or something - ok. An apostle - ok. But not a real prophet.

***This is a fact no Muslim will admit: Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet or seer. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

It also is remarkable that Muhammad relatively seldom used the title "prophet" about himself in the Quran. He mostly used the title "Messenger", even though messenger in reality means an errand-boy (Muslims try to make this title something big and imposing, but this is the meaning of it). "Prophet" on the other hand is a heavy and impressive title telling a lot about the person. May the reason for why he did not use it so often, be that he knew he did not have what it took to merit that title, and was a little careful using it, so as not to provoke questions or comments? (And is this also the reason why Muslims try to pretend that "messenger" is something more impressive and heavy than "prophet"?)

If the Quran simply belongs among the apocryphal books, many things are easy to understand, and it at least belongs in that line and tradition, even if it is further "out" than most of the others. Muhammad also fits the picture of the leader of an apocryphal sect, admittedly more immoral and bloody than most of the others.

Also see 30/40h and 30/47b above.

287 33/53d: “- - - the Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*) houses - - -.” A historical anomaly.

288 33/53e: “- - - annoys the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -.” See 33/53c above.

289 33/53f: “And when ye (Muslim men*) ask (his (Muhammad’s*)) ladies for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen - - -.” Note: A screen, not a veil. This is all that is said about the hiding of women in the Quran. Nothing more: A screen, not a veil, and only concerning the wives – and likely also his other women – of Muhammad. (But you find veils in the Hadiths – which is written 200 – 250 years later, and where it is very clear that a lot is made up stories (the Quran f.x. proves that all the stories in the Hadiths about miracles around Muhammad are made up ones)).

Further: Read 33/28-29 through 33/33 + 33/50 and 33/51 together to get a picture of his – and very many other dominant religious persons in strong and dark religious societies – technique. One of the much used – and proved efficient – ways of manipulating dependant persons. Even the use or disuse of the god is typical for such persons. All this formally is about Muhammad’s private intimate life, but as what he said and did was and is the correct ethical and moral code in Islam, this is the norm for all women concerning this aspect of life under Islam.

290 33/53g: "- - - Allah's Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A variety of Muhammad's standard mantra to glue himself to his platform of power; his god.

291 33/53h: "- - - Allah's Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -" No god sends a messenger to give so much wrong information and facts.

292 33/53i: "- - - (nor*) that ye (Muslims*) should marry his (Muhammad's*) widows after him at any time". Jealousy? Selfishness? - his wives were young compared to him, and surely good-looking.

293 33/53j: "Truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

294 33/53k: The whole of this verse is about Muhammad's private life. It does not belong in a claimed "holy" book. It also does not belong in a claimed "Mother Book" copied to 124ooo earlier prophets for whom this was totally irrelevant. Not to mention that no god would revere texts like this in his Heaven, like claimed in the Quran (13/13b, 43/4, 85/21-22).

295 33/53l: "- - - in Allah's sight an enormity". Allah's or Muhammad's?

296 33/54a: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

297 33/54b: "- - - Allah has full knowledge of all things." The old reminder and warning - here connected to: Do not have sex with my widows. A self centered man? But also see 2/233h above.

298 33/55a: “There is no blame (on the ladies if they appear (indecently dressed*)) before their fathers or their sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the (slaves) whom their right hands possess.” It is unclear what the two last groups really cover. “Their women” may mean their slave women – literally “their”. Or their close female friends or relatives. Or – if this verse is directed mainly to Muhammad’s wives like some commentators mean – Muslim women in general. As for “the (slaves) whom their right hands possess” that simply means the slaves they owns, but it is not clear if it means of both sexes – that male slaves counted so little that it was ok – but commentators mostly wants it to mean “female slaves.”

299 33/55b: “There is no blame (on the ladies if they appear (indecently dressed*)) before their fathers or their sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the (slaves) whom their right hands possess.” Part of the basis for the sharia laws.

300 33/55c: (A71 – in 2008 edition A72): “- - - or their (believing women*) women - - -“. To what women does this relate? – as slaves are mentioned separately later in the sentence, it cannot be slave women. Close relatives? Other close or not very close ones? Or all women? Islam tends to believe the last, but the verse is open for all those meanings. And these variants as normal also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word(s) there has/have more than one meaning. Allah (?) really uses a clear language worthy a god.

301 33/55d: "- - - Allah witness to all things". The standard warning and reminder - here connected to that women should not try to cheat and be indecent. But also see 2/233h above.

302 33/56a: "Allah and His Angels send blessings on the Prophet: O ye that believe! Send ye blessing on him, and salute him with all respect". Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Idi Amin and many others would like to be able to use words like this and be believed.

303 33/56b: "- - - the Prophet - - -". See 33/53c above.

304 33/56c: "- - - the Prophet (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

305 33/56d: "- - - ye who believe - - -". Muslims.

306 33/57a: "Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

307 33/57b: "Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger - Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter - - -". You had better not annoy Muhammad (Allah is able to take care of himself). The ultimate dream position for any dictator.

308 33/57c: "- - - Allah and His Messenger - - -". Muhammad's standard mantra to glue himself to his god and platform of power. (But no god ever sent a messenger telling so many errors, etc.)

309 33/57d: "- - - His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

310 33/57e: "- - - His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

311 33/57f: "- - - a humiliating Punishment". See 3/77b above.

312 33/58a: “And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.” But for Muslims to steal and extort from, rape, suppress, and murder non-Muslims without being provoked, was/is “good and lawful” as long as you can name it jihad – and anything is called jihad as long as the opponent is non-Muslim, not to mention Pagan. No doubt Muslims are something much better, yes.

313 33/58b: "- - - believing men and women - - -". Muslims.

314 33/58c: "- - - a glaring sin - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exists.

315 33/59a: “O Prophet! (Muhammad*) - - -.” See 33/55c above.

316 33/59b: “O Prophet! (Muhammad*) - - -.” A historical anomaly.

317 33/59c: “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad) - - -.” What is “outer garments”? – the veil at least is neither mentioned nor indicated. And what is “when abroad”? - his wives never left Arabia.

318 33/59d: “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad) - - -.” Part of the basis for the sharia laws.

319 33/59e: "And Allah is Oft-Forgiving - - -". See 33/50j above.

320 33/59f: "And Allah is - - - Most Merciful". See f.x. 1/1a above".

321 33/60a: "Truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

322 33/60b: “Truly, if the Hypocrites, and the ones in whose hearts is a disease - - - desists not - - - they will not be able to stay in it (a city) as thy neighbor’s for any length of time - -”. Bad people are to be chased away.

323 33/60c: "- - - those in whose hearts is a disease - - -". One of Muhammad's many disgust inducing names for non-Muslims - in this case included hypocrites who pretended to be Muslims.

324 33/60d: “- - - those (non-Muslims, hypocrites, etc.*) in whose heart is a disease - - -“. A good slogan that you meet many places in the Quran: If you are not a good Muslim, that means you are sick. But like many slogans it may be a twisted truth – or simply a lie.

###325 33/60e: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad or not Muslims*) - - -". To twist an old proverb: This sentence alone tells more than a 1000 choice slogans about "the religion of peace". What you say when you forget to guard your words or do not think it necessary, always by far is more reliable than carefully chosen claims. Also see next comment just below.

#####326 33/60f: "- - - We (Allah*) shall certainly stir thee (Muslims*) up against them (bad or not Muslims*), then they will not be able to stay in it (the city*) as thy neighbor’s for any length of time". This tells as much as the comment just above. Something to remember when you accept Muslims to your city? There already are demands for special treatment for Muslims many places. We remind you that most - at least 70 on average according to research - are as ok as you and me. But the problem is: Who is who?.

###327 33/61a: “They (hypocrites - not good enough Muslims – or non-Muslims*) shall have a curse on them whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain (without mercy).” If you are not good enough Muslims – and sometimes others – you are to be killed without mercy. A most clear order. Only do not mention it, because the propaganda lines are f.x.: “The Religion of Peace” and “No compulsion in Religion". This verse contradicts (and abrogates) at least these verses (here are 88 out of the 124 Muslim scholars say are abrogated by 9/5): 2/109, 2/190, 2/256, 2/272, 3/20, 4/62, 4/81, 4/90, 5/3, 5/28, 5/48, 5/99, 6/60, 6/66, 6/70, 6/104, 6/107, 6/112, 6/158, 7/87, 7/188, 7/193, 7/199, 8/61, 9/68, 10/41, 10/99, 10/102, 10/108, 11/12, 11/121, 13/40, 15/3, 15/94, 16/35, 16/82, 16/125, 16/126, 16/127, 17/54, 18/29, 18/56, 19/39, 20/130, 21/107, 21/112, 22/49, 22/68, 23/54, 23/96, 24/54, 26/216, 27/92, 28/50, 28/55, 29/18, 29/46, 32/30, 34/25, 34/28, 35/23, 35/24a, 36/17, 39/41, 41/34, 42/6, 42/15, 42/48, 43/83, 43/89, 44/59, 45/14, 46/9, 46/135a, 46/135b, 46/135b, 50/39, 50/45, 51/50-51, 51/54, 52/45, 52/47, 53/29, 67/26, 73/10, 73/11, 79/45, 86/17, 88/22, 109/6. They are all quoted under 9/5. (At least 91 contradictions).

###328 33/61b: “- - - whenever they (hypocrites and non-Muslims, whoever decides whom they are*) are found, they shall be sized and slain (without mercy)”. A good verse for many a mullah and imam and for terrorists - and for starting pogroms. What disturbs us is that this may be the future many places, as the Quran is forever.

###329 33/61c: “(Hypocrites and non-Muslims and those who make unrest*) shall have a course upon them: wherever they are found, they shall be sized and slain (without mercy)”. More plainly it is difficult to tell it - and who is to decide what is unrest and who starts and continues it? Pogroms happen - f. ex. in Indonesia and Malaysia against Chinese not long ago - they were richer than the Muslims (Chinese work more and often have more education). Will there be unrest against others because they are richer than Muslims somewhere in the future? - or simply because non-Muslims never should be the boss of a Muslim (not likely to be a rule today, except perhaps in conservative areas, but it used to be a rule during for hundreds of years many places)?

####330 33/61d: “(Hypocrites and non-Muslims and those who make unrest*) shall have a course upon them: wherever they are found, they shall be sized and slain (without mercy)”. We intended to ask you compare this to NT, but such a comparison is not possible. At least a 200% proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god, and Jesus and Muhammad morally not even distantly connected.

###331 33/61-62: “They (non-Muslims, hypocrites, etc.*) shall have a curse on them: whenever they are found, they shall be sized and slain (without mercy) (‘no compulsion in religion’ 2/256*). (Such was) the praxis (approved) of Allah among those who lived aforetime (f.x. Jews and Christians*). Muhammad claimed that Allah was just another name for Yahweh – but try to find an order telling that all non-Christians shall be murdered “without mercy” in NT and in the new covenant (f. ex. Luke 22/20 in NT) - a covenant Muslims never mention - and NT is what Christianity is built on . Oh, we know very well that persons from Christian countries have done bad things, but that was in spite of their religion – and they were not really Christians deep down – and not in accordance with, or even because of the religion, like the case often is with the “religion of peace” (Muslim-speak for camouflaging the “religion of war”) Islam.

###332 33/62a: “(Such was) the practice (kill non-believers without mercy*) (approved) of Allah among those who lived aforetime: no change wilt thou find in the practice (approved) of Allah.” Muhammad here refers to the Mosaic and the Christian religions (and he wrongly sets Allah = Yahweh) when he talks about “those who lived aforetime”. But even though OT is hard against many non-Jews, the war and the killing was to get room for living for the Jews, not wanton murdering just because they were not Jews or for plunder and slaves. And in NT: Try to find a single place saying that non-believers shall be murdered just because they have another religion – such an order simply does not exist. The Quran here actually is a 180 degree contradiction to the very core of the teachings of Jesus.

Any god had been lying if he said this, but Muhammad did not know the Bible well, so may be – just may be – he thought he spoke the truth. In any case it was a good statement for a warlord trying to secure and enlarge his platform of power. (This surah is believed to be from 627 – 629 AD – before he had gained absolute control by conquering Mecca.)

333 33/62b: “Such (to kill non-Muslims not living according to Islam’s laws of suppression of non-Muslims*) was the practice (approved) of Allah among the ones that lived aforetime: no change wilt thou find in the practice (approved) of Allah (now or in the future*)”. If Islam/Muslims grow strong enough some time, this is what to expect, according to their holy book. How had the world looked today, if the industrial revolution with its superior weapons, ships and economic and military superiority had happened in the Muslim area? - Islam has no moral, ethical, empathetically, ideological or philosophical ideas against suppressing other people - on the contrary it is a religious duty. Actually Islam has no moral or ethical philosophy at all - that was decided once and for all before 1100 AD by the religion, with al Ghazali - "the greatest Muslim after Muhammad" - as the grave digger with his book "The Incoherence of the Philosophers". (There were a few thinkers for some more time - about 100 more years - in Spain, but they got little influence on the mainstream Islam).

334 33/62c: "- - - no change wilt thou (Muslims/Muhammad*) find in the praxis (approved) of Allah". Wrong to say the least of it. Read the NT - it is so different from the war religion of the Quran, that it is not a question of finding changes, but if there exist basic similarities at all. The praxis approved of Yahweh is extremely different from the one approved by Allah - that is to say; Allah has approved nothing if he does not exist.

335 33/63a: "Men (contemporaries of Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

336 33/63b: "Men ask thee (Muhammad*) concerning the Hour - - -". See 33/12c above.

337 33/63c: "- - - the Hour - - -". The Day of Doom.

338 33/63d: "The knowledge thereof (the Day of Doom*) is with Allah alone". Perhaps true - if Allah exists - but at least a very convenient answer for Muhammad - especially if he had no contact with a god

339 33/63e: "- - - perchance the Hour is nigh!" A very common sentence to meet from religious leaders wanting to frighten their congregations to obedience.

340 33/64a: "Verily - - -". There are so many mistakes, etc. in the Quran, that nothing can be called a verity unless it is proved.

341 33/64b: "Verily, Allah has cursed the Unbelievers - - -". Who wants contact with people cursed by the god? A damaging sentence for co-habitation between believing Muslims and others. 

242 33/64c: "Verily, Allah has cursed the Unbelievers - - -". Only perhaps true if Allah exists and is a major god - - - and if the Quran in addition has told the full truth and only the truth about him.

343 33/64d: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Non-Muslims.

344 33/64e: "- - - (Allah has*) prepared for them (non-Muslims*) a Blazing Fire - - -". See 3/77b above.

345 33/64f: "- - - a Blazing Fire - - -". Hell.

346 33/65a: "To dwell therein (Hell*) or ever - - -". But 6/128c, 11/107b, 43/74c, 51/13c, and 78/23 may indicate that Hell is not quite forever.

347 33/65b: "- - - no protector will they (non-Muslims*) find, nor helper". Now Yahweh's rules for who deserves Paradise and who not, at some points are very different from Allah's - one of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god. Not unlikely Yahweh may be a protector and helper at least for his followers.

348 33/66a: "The Day - - -". Here: The Day of Doom.

349 33/66b: "- - - the Fire - - -". Hell.

350 33/66c: ""would that we (non-Muslims*) had obeyed Allah and obeyed the Messenger (Muhammad*)". In a religion it really should be enough to obey the god - which should have been what counted. But one also had to obey Muhammad. A bit thought provoking when you know this is a mannerism followed by many false prophets.

351 33/66d: "- - - Allah and - - - the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A variation of Muhammad's central mantra to glue himself to Allah and thus to his platform of power.

352 33/66e: "- - - the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

353 33/66f: "- - - the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

354 33/67: "- - - the (right) Path". The roar to the Quran's Paradise - also see 10/9f above.

355 33/69a: "- - - ye who believe - - -". Muslims.

356 33/69b: "- - - those who vexed and insulted Moses - - -". See 33/12c above.

357 33/69c: "- - - Moses - - -". A historical anomaly.

358 33/70a: "- - - ye who believe - - -". Muslims.

359 33/70b: "Fear Allah - - -". Why? - it is highly unlikely he exists, and if he exists we know nothing about him - the texts in the Quran are too unreliable.

360 33/70c: "- - - (always) say a word directed to the Right". The Arab word here translated with "the Right", is a word meaning "exactly correct" - true, relevant for the point, and straight to the point. Remember that this is how the Quran demands things should be said - and several places in the book says is how things are said in the Quran - , when they try to explain away mistakes, etc, by claiming it is an analogy or something - a very normal "explaining away" for Muslims to use.

361 33/71a: ""That He (Allah*) may make your conduct whole and sound and forgive you your sins - - -". This only is possible if Allah exists and really is a god.

362 33/71b: "- - - forgive - - -". Allah can forgive nobody if he just is a made up god or a dressed up pagan god (al-Lah) - not to mention if he belongs to the dark forces.

363 33/71c: "- - - your sins - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exists.

364 33/71d: "- - - he that obeys Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See f.x. 33/66c above.

365 33/71e: "- - - he that obeys Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". Muslim.

366 33/71f: "- - - he that obeys Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*), has already achieved the highest Achievement". No comment - except: Good psychology if the listeners are naive, uneducated or in more or less blind belief.

367 33/71g: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". The chief mantra for Muhammad to glue himself to his platform of power - his god.

368 33/71h: "- - - His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

269 33/71i: "- - - His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a below.

370 33/71j: "- - - he that obeys Allah and His Messenger, has already attained the highest Achievement". As Muhammad was the only one of these two the people met, these were the sweetest possible words for Muhammad's lust for power - and for any dictator's such lust.

371 33/72a: “We (Allah*) did indeed offered the Trust (the Quran*) to the Heavens (plural and wrong*) and (the planet*) Earth and the Mountains, but they refused to undertake it - - -”. Neither the planet (or disc like Muhammad believed) Earth, nor its mountains has the brain or consciousness to accept or refuse anything. A fairy tale.

372 33/72b: “We (Allah*) even offered the Trust to the Heavens (plural and wrong*) and (the planet*) Earth and the Mountains, but they refused to undertake it - - -”. A case of animism or even anthropomorphism - things you normally find in primitive religions (and in fairy tales).

373 33/72c: (A33/86 – in 2008 edition A33/87): “We (Allah*) did indeed offer the Trust to the Heavens (plural and wrong) and the Mountains - - -.” But what is the meaning of the Arab word “amanah” which here is called “trust”? The plain reality is that nobody knows. And the as plain truth is that no matter how grandiose a translation you will ever meet (“the trust of reason and volition” f. x.) it is nothing but guesswork. But Muslims have the gall of using the claimed “clear and easily understood language in the Quran” as a proof for that the book is not made by humans. And worse: Many a Muslim with little education really believes it himself.

374 33/72d: “We (Allah*) did indeed offer the Trust (Islam/the Quran) to the (material*) Heavens and the Earth and the Mountains; but they refused to undertake it, being afraid thereof - - -.” Frightened suns and planets and mountains??? Not bad even for a religion – just like in fairy tales.

375 33/72e: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

376 33/72f: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

377 33/72g: "- - - unjust - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

378 33/73a: (Because man – the Arabs – undertook the Trust of the Quran/Islam -) “With the result that Allah has to punish the Hypocrites, men and women, and the unbelievers, men and women - - -.” And Muslims works on behalf of Allah (why? - if Allah is omnipotent, why?) This verse abrogated (and contradicts) at least these verses (here are 88 out of the 124 Muslim scholars say are abrogated by 9/5): 2/109, 2/190, 2/256, 2/272, 3/20, 4/62, 4/81, 4/90, 5/3, 5/28, 5/48, 5/99, 6/60, 6/66, 6/70, 6/104, 6/107, 6/112, 6/158, 7/87, 7/188, 7/193, 7/199, 8/61, 9/68, 10/41, 10/99, 10/102, 10/108, 11/12, 11/121, 13/40, 15/3, 15/94, 16/35, 16/82, 16/125, 16/126, 16/127, 17/54, 18/29, 18/56, 19/39, 20/130, 21/107, 21/112, 22/49, 22/68, 23/54, 23/96, 24/54, 26/216, 27/92, 28/50, 28/55, 29/18, 29/46, 32/30, 34/25, 34/28, 35/23, 35/24a, 36/17, 39/41, 41/34, 42/6, 42/15, 42/48, 43/83, 43/89, 44/59, 45/14, 46/9, 46/135a, 46/135b, 46/135b, 50/39, 50/45, 51/50-51, 51/54, 52/45, 52/47, 53/29, 67/26, 73/10, 73/11, 79/45, 86/17, 88/22, 109/6. They are all quoted under 9/5 in www.1000mistakes.com : 1000 Mistakes in the Quran,. (At least 88 abrogations).

379 33/73b: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Non-Muslims.

380 33/73c: "- - - Allah turns in Mercy to the Believers - - -". There never was a proved case of this - lots of claims, but never a proved case.

381 33/73d: "- - - the Believers - - -". The Muslims.

382 33/73e: "- - - Allah is oft-Forgiving, - - -". Allah can forgive nobody unless he exists and is a god.

383 33/73f: "- - - Allah is - - - Most Merciful". See 1/1a above

Surah 33: Sub-total: 383 + 13.596 = 13.979 comments.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

NB: If you find any mistakes anywhere, please inform us. If it is a real mistake, it will be corrected. Please also inform us if we have overlooked points or errors.


>>> Go to Next Surah

>>> Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".