1000+ Comments on the Quran: Surah 14 -- Ibrahim (Abraham)

Revelation: Mecca, 621 - 622 AD.

(See general comments on Surahs here: Introduction)


 

The quotes and comments

001 "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captured - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 14/1a "Alif Lim Ra'". See 11/1a above.

003 14/1b: “A Book (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) have revealed - - -”. The same old question: Can a book with so many very clear mistaken facts and other errors really be revealed by an omniscient god? And is it a coincident that many of the mistaken facts are in accordance with what one believed in Arabia at the time of Muhammad – even with fairy tales? Impossible. It is not a god’s stories.

004 14/1c: “...revealed..." See 13/1d+e+f and 13/19b+c above.

005 14/1d: “A Book (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) have revealed unto thee (Muhammad*)- - -”. As no god has revealed a book of such a miserable quality, also no god has revealed it unto Muhammad. There also is the question if any good and benevolent god could use such a warlike representative with such a doubtful moral, ethics, reliability (f.x. al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie - "break even your oaths", etc.), and total lack of empathy, especially with his victims, etc.

006 14/1e: “- - - revealed unto thee (Muhammad*)- - -”. A historical anomaly.

*007 14/1f: “- - - in order that thou (Muhammad – by means of the Quran*) mightest lead mankind out of the depths of darkness and into light - - -“. No book with that many mistakes and that doubtful moral can lead anyone into light. The same goes for any religion so suppressing, inhuman and so full of Nazi-like ideology (before you protest, beware that these are not our words), discrimination, blood and war, and “all power to Muhammad/the leader”.

008 14/1g: "- - - by the leave of their (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". We quote YA1870: "It is insisted that every Prophet speaks not from himself but from Allah". Except for that the Bible tells it was Yahweh, this may be correct - but only for real prophets. For false prophets this possible rule is not valid. Muhammad was no real prophet - he had not the gift of being able to make prophesies - and might have been a false one (all the errors, etc. in the Quran indicates this - in addition to his inability to "see the unseen".).

009 14/1h: "- - - by the leave of their (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says everybody’s Lord/god is Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

010 14/1i: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, but not unmistakably proved one single time in 1400 years.

011 14/1j: "(Allah is*) Worthy all Prize!" Please read the some 22-24 surahs from Medina and see if you agree - there is much dishonesty, rape, suppression, apartheid, and blood. Also see 1/1a above.

012 14/2a: "Of Allah, to Whom do belong all things in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and on earth!" One of the many undocumented claims Muhammad makes for glorification of his god - claims any believer in any religion as cheaply can make on behalf of his god(s) as long as he can evade any question for documentation - Muhammad never - never - proved anything of essence for his religion.

013 14/2b: "Of Allah, to Whom do belong all things in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and on earth!" Contradicted by the Bible, which says it belongs to Yahweh, not to Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

014 14/2c: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

015 14/2d: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Any non-Muslims.

016 14/2e: "For a terrible Penalty (their ("unbelievers") Unfaith will bring them)!" See 3/77b above.

017 14/2f: "(- - - unfaith - - -)". Contradicted by the Bible, at least as far as believers in Yahweh go. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

018 14/3a: "Those who love the life of this world - - -". One of Muhammad's many negative names for non-Muslims.

019 14/3b: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are astray by a long distance". Only if there is a god behind the Quran and the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth + the god(s) they believe in does/do not exist. The mistake is even worse if the Quran is made up and there instead exists a real god somewhere else.

020 14/3c: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are astray by a long distance". Contradicted by the Bible, at least as far as believers in Yahweh go. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

021 14/4a: “We (Allah*) sent not a Messenger except (to teach) in the language of his (own) people - - -.” Wrong. If you can call Moses a Messenger, he had to speak Egyptian in Egypt – not Hebrew. And Lot was from Ur in Chaldea (not too far from the Persian Gulf in Iraq), not from Sodom or Gomorrah – and when the Quran says the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were his people, also that is wrong, this even more so as both the Bible and the Quran makes it very clear that not only was he a stranger, but also he was not integrated with the locals. And Jonah (a Hebrew - Jonah 1/9) was not from Nineveh, Assyria, where he had to preach. Also Abraham was a foreigner (from Ur in Chaldea) with a language foreign to the place he settled down (Canaan and Sinai) – if one reckons him to be a messenger. The same goes for the Hebrew Joseph in Egypt in case.

There also is a related question: Why did Allah send down the Quran only in Arabian? - according to Hadiths Muhammad said it had been sent down in 7 varieties, which all the same all were correct, even if they varied. But why only in Arab. The thousands of Jews in the area could have benefitted from it in Hebrew. And there were big civilizations nearby: Persia, Egypt, the East Roman Empire - but nothing in Persian, Egyptian, Greek or Latin. This is even more strange as at least Persian, Greek and Latin had complete alphabet (Egypt had pictures), and it had been possible to write Allah's exact meaning, which all too often was impossible in the unfinished Arab alphabet (it lacked vowels and the points modern Arab use to write some of its letters). We have seen claimed that the reason was that Muhammad only knew Arab, and thus could not recite it in other languages. But it had cost an omniscient god exactly nothing to send it down in those languages in other ways. But if it was Muhammad who made up the Quran and knew only Arab well enough, an explanation is very easy to see.

022 14/4b: "- - - in order to make things clear - - -". A book where too many things are unclear or even wrong like in the Quran cannot make things clear - clearly demonstrated by all the mistakes, etc. Muslims believe in even today.

023 14/4c: “- - - Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases, and guides whom he pleases - - -.” Not the same god who was behind NH. See f. ex. "the lost lamb".

024 14/4d: (A14/4): “Now Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases.” Or may be “- - - Allah lets go astray him that wills - - -”? The first one is the literal meaning, though both are possible from the Arab text. But it paints a truly unsympathetic picture of the benevolent god Allah, so Muslim scholars to a large degree agrees on that something like the second meaning must be the true one. If it is clear, but do not fit the picture one likes, then explain that it is unclear and in reality means something else - the god has not been able to express himself correctly. And as said many times before; these variants also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word(s) there has/have more than one meaning.

025 14/4e: "- - - guides - - -". No reliable guiding is possible by means of a guide-book full of mistakes.

026 14/4f: "- - - He (Allah*) is Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, never proved. If it had been proved even one single time in these 1400 years, it had been impossible not to know it - Muslims had told about it whenever there was a chance.

027 14/4g: "- - - (Allah is*) full of wisdom." Read "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran" in http://www.1000mistakes.com , check if the quotes there are correct, and then see if you agree in this claim.

028 14/5a: "We (Allah*) sent Moses with Our Signs - - -". According to the Bible it was Yahweh who sent him and who gave him the signs. (The Quran likes to claim - as always without any documentation - that the two are the same god, but the teachings are so fundamentally different, that this is not correct.

029 14/5b: "- - - Moses - - -". A time anomaly.

030 14/5c: "Bring out thy (Moses’*) people from the depth of darkness into light - - -". Perhaps possible if Moses used the words of Yahweh - but the Quran implicates he got a book similar to the Quran. There is not much light in a teaching based on a book like the Quran with that much wrong - and consequently also not from a god.

###031 14/5d: “Bring out thy (Moses’*) people (the Jews*) from the depth of darkness into light, and teach them to remember the Days of Allah”. We just remind you that Muhammad claimed Allah = Yahweh - a claim which is easy to see is wrong, as the fundamental ideas and ideologies in the teachings are too deeply different (Jesus love and peace and empathy, Muhammad Nazi-like haughtiness, discrimination and war - and lawful dishonesty (al-Taqiyya, etc)). Because of this claim, he uses the name Allah for Yahweh. This mistake is so obvious and so easy to see, that often we do not bother to comment on it.

032 14/5e: (A14/5): “Bring out thy (Moses’*) people (the Jews*) from the depth of darkness into light, and teach them to remember the Days of Allah”. What is meant by the Days of Allah? – the Exodus from Egypt? – or the Day of Doom? – or for that case some other day? Nobody knows. But when a god gives an order like this, it is far from unimportant that his followers get a chance to understand what he is talking about. Would a god forget that information?

033 14/5f: “Bring out thy (Moses’*) people (the Jews*) from the depth of darkness into light, and teach them to remember the Days of Allah”. According to the Bible, the involved god was Yahweh, not Allah.

034 14/5g: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

035 14/5h: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b and 13/2m above. Besides: Moses hardly met Allah - he in case met Yahweh. We remind you that Allah and Yahweh in spite of the Quran's repeated, but never documented claims are not the same god - too fundamental differences. And that science long since has proved that also the Quran's many, but never documented (like always for central questions in the Quran) claims that the Bible is falsified are wrong. Actually Islam has proved it stronger by not finding one single falsified manuscript among the many thousands of relevant old such ones.

036 14/5i: "- - - such as are firmly patient and constant - - -". = Muslims.

037 14/6a: "- - - Moses said to his people - - -". Historical anomalies.

038 14/6b: "- - - the favors of Allah - - -". According to the Bible the god involved in this case was Yahweh, not Allah.

039 14/6c: “(Moses said about Pharaoh that he*) slaughtered your sons and let your women-folk live - - -.” Actually this is in accordance with what the Bible tells (The Quran tells the baby Moses was put to the Nile (20/39) but do not give a reason for such a crime. The Bible tells that it was because of a royal order to kill all Jewish boy babies (2. Mos. 1/22), and his mother put him on the river in a desperate try to save him.) But it contradicts two verses in the Quran that told not that it was done, but that Pharaoh would start doing it during the confrontation with Moses. (Similar in 2/49 and 7/141).

7/127: “He (Pharaoh*) said: ‘Their male children will we slay: (only) their females will we save alive - - -“. And it is clear that this is to start fast.

40/25: “Slay the sons of those who believe in him (Moses*)”.

(2 contradictions).

040 14/6d: "(Pharaoh Ramses II*) slaughtered your (the Jews'*) sons, and let your women-folk live: therein was a tremendous trial from your Lord". According to the Bible this was a misdeed from the Pharaoh, not a trial from the god.

041 14/6e: "- - - a tremendous trial from your Lord (Allah*)". See 8/28a above.

042 14/7a: "- - - truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

043 14/7b: "- - - my (Allah's*) punishment is terrible indeed". See 3/77b above.

044 14/7c: "- - - indeed". See 2/2b above.

045 14/8a: "- - - Moses - - -". A historical anomaly.

046 14/8b: "- - - Allah (is*) - - - Worthy of all praise." Please read the harsh surahs from Medina - as they are the youngest, those mainly are the ones which count according to Islam's rules for abrogation (making points and verses invalid). Also see 1/1a above. Then you afterwards decide if you agree.

048 14/9a: "- - - Noah - - - 'Ad - - - Thamud - - -". Historical anomalies.

049 14/9b: "- - - 'Ad, and Thamud - - -". 2 tribes who according to old Arab folklore lived in Arabia in really old times, and whom you meet several times in the Quran. According to Islam they lived around and a little later than the times of Abraham but before Moses. Abraham lived - if he is not fiction - around 1800-2000 BC according to science and Moses around 1300 BC. There exists no real information about them, except maybe one or two small mentionings. The tales in the Quran are from Arab folklore, adjusted to fit Islam by Allah or by someone else. For the ones who do not know the Bible well - we f.x. know that quite a few Hindus read this, as there are problems with Islam in India - we mention that Noah is one of the very early persons in OT - the one who with his family survived the Big Flood.

050 14/9c: "- - - none knows them but Allah". Again: Not unless he exists.

051 14/9d: "To them (Noah, 'Ad, Thamud, etc.*) came messengers - - -". Wrong as far as Noah goes. The Quran clearly indicate and the Bible directly says (1. Mos. 7/13) that the god contacted Noah directly.

052 14/9e: “- - - Clear (Sign) - - -“. There are no clear signs for Allah or for Muhammad in the Quran and nowhere else – not one. See 2/39b and 2/99 above.

053 14/9f: "- - - we ('Ad, Thamud and others*) are really in suspicious (disquieting) doubt about that which ye invite us". As the Quran claims they were invited by means of a copy similar to the Quran to Islam, the reason may well have been that they understood something was seriously wrong.

###054 14/10a: "Is there a doubt about Allah - - -?" Yes, there clearly is:

The absolute only source for the claims of his existence, the Quran, is a book so full of mistakes, contradictions, etc. that it is highly unreliable.

This book was dictated by a man with lust for power, a moral which was pretty amoral - cfr. his acceptance of lying (al-Taqiyya, Kitman and breaking of oaths), thieving, enslaving, womanizing/rape, murder, etc. - and possibly with a mental illness (TLE?).

It is claimed that the religion is from Adam and before, but not one single trace of any kind older than 610 AD exists anywhere.

There never was any kind of reliable proof for any of the claims - including the existence of Allah. Absolutely nothing."

Allah has never - neither before Muhammad, nor during Muhammad's life, nor after Muhammad given one single reliable sign showing that he exists".

The only possible conclusion is that there are good reasons for strong doubts about Allah's existence.

And even if he should exist there are good reasons for strong doubts about how he wants his followers to behave - partly because there is so much difference between Islam before 622 AD and after 622 AD when Muhammad started to need warriors, and partly because so much is wrong in the book, that also the claim about a possible Allah may be wrong.</0l>

055 14/10b: "- - - Allah, the Creator of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". See 11/7a above.

056 14/10c: "- - - Allah, the Creator of the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says this was done by Yahweh, not by Allah. (And by a number of other religions - it is one of those claims anybody can use free of charge on behalf of their god(s) as long as no proof is required.) Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

057 14/10d: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

058 14/10e: "- - - it is He (Allah*) Who invites you (to Islam*) - - -". Only if he exists and is behind the Quran and Islam. But this at least was what Muhammad claimed.

059 14/10f: "- - - forgive your sins - - -". There only are 2 who can forgive: The victim and a god. Is Allah a god even if he should happen to exist? - he at least is not behind a book of a quality like the Quran.

060 14/10g: "- - - respite for a time appointed!" The predestination again - Allah has decided, and nothing can change his Plan.

061 14/10h: "They (the non-Muslims*) said (to the claimed messengers*) - - -". Time anomalies.

062 14/10i: "They (the non-Muslims*) said (to the claimed messengers*): 'Ah! Ye are no more than humans - - -". How could this end up in the claimed "Mother Book" (of which the Quran is a copy according to Muhammad) billions of years before it was said or happened? One more of the many texts or quotes in the Quran which could not have been reliably written into the claimed "Mother Book" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in Heaven (of which the Quran is claimed to be a copy) eons ago, unless predestination was and is 100% like the Quran claims many places (if you look, you will find more cases than we mention - we only mention some of the obvious ones). If man has free will - even partly only (an expression some Muslims use to flee from the problem full predestination contra free will for man (and also contra that there is no meaning in praying to Allah for help, if everything already is predestined in accordance with a plan "nobody and nothing can change" - a problem which Muslims seldom mention), and an expression no Muslim we have met has ever defined) - and can change his mind, full and reliable clairvoyance about the future, not to mention the distant future, is impossible even for a god, as the man always could/can change his mind or his words once more, in spite of Islam's claims. There are at least 3 reasons - 2 of them unavoidable - for this:

When something is changed, automatically the future is changed.

The laws of chaos will be at work and change things, if even a tiny part is made different.

The so-called "Butterfly Effect"; "a butterfly flapping its wing in Brazil may cause a storm in China later on" or "a small bump may overturn a big load".

This that Allah predestines everything like the Quran claims and states many places, is an essential point, because besides totally removing the free will of man (in spite of the Quran's claims of such free will, or some Muslims' adjusted "partly free will for man" - to adjust the meanings where the texts in the Quran are wrong, is typical for Islam and its Muslims) - it also removes the moral behind Allah's punishing (and rewarding) persons for what they say and do - Allah cannot reward or punish people for things he himself has forced them to say or do, and still expect to be believed when he (Muhammad?) claims to be a good or benevolent or moral or just god. Also see 2/51b and 3/24a above.

And as mentioned above, full predestination also makes prayers to Allah meaningless, as everything already is predestined according to Allah's Plan - a Plan which no prayer ("nobody and nothing") can change.

063 14/10j: "Ye (the claimed prophets*) are no more than humans, like ourselves! We wish to turn us away from the (gods) our fathers used to worship: then bring us some clear authority". Do you see the close parallel to Muhammad's own position in 621-622 AD when this surah was released? There are dozens of such parallels to Muhammad in the Quran - each story about a claimed prophet or good man in the book parallels Muhammad's situation at the time of releasing the relevant surah. This simply is Muhammad's way of explaining away for his followers his difficulties and problems with being accepted by most people, and at the same time "documenting" that such problem were normal for prophets, and thus "proving" that Muhammad was a normal prophet. To quote Mr. Stalin: "Once is coincidence, twice is suspicious, thrice is proof". Muhammad did not make such parallels twice or thrice, but more or less every time he told tales about earlier real or claimed prophet (with a partly exception for Jesus - he was too special and too well known). Would a god need to prove himself or his prophet in such a clumsy way? - then who made the Quran?

064 14/10k: “Ye (the claimed prophets*) wish to turn us (pagan Arabs*) away from the (gods) our fathers used to worship: then bring us some clear authority.” These pagans did not say no - they asked for proof. Proofs would have made an impression, but like Muhammad Islam's(?) prophets(?) also at these times could prove nothing. But no doubt: People asked for proofs.

065 14/10-17: One of the many stories claiming that more or less all former prophets had had similar problems like Muhammad (this was in 621-622 AD before Muhammad started gaining power). Such stories were confirmations to his followers and alibis for his claims towards others that he was a "bona fide" prophet. As most of these stories ended with that the opponents were severely punished, they also were pep-talks for his followers, and it was good for their moral to "know" the "enemy" will be punished, whereas "we" go to Paradise. True or not - it often is what you believe which counts for many. There are many storied like this in the Quran - they are easy for you to find. Also see 14/10j above.

066 14/11a: "Their (earlier peoples*) messengers said to them: 'True, we are humans like yourselves - - -.'" It seems to have been essential for Muhammad to tell his followers that he was a normal prophet, and met problems and distrust prophets normally met - that made it easier for his followers to believe in him. Nearly all former prophets - real or not - he told about, he claimed had identical stories to his own = he was identical to the old accepted prophets = Proof - I am a real prophet. Also see 14/10j above.

067 14/11b: "- - - Allah doth grant His grace to such of His servants as He pleases". This and similar sentences normally in the Quran is an "explanation" for why good persons often had a bad life and the other way round - Allah's unfathomable wisdom. But just here it can be an answer to those who found an Arab prophet strange - Muhammad used it about himself a few times.

068 14/11c: "- - - Allah doth grant His grace to such of His servants as He pleases". Beware of that this also was Muhammad's standard answer when asked how he could be a prophet for the god even though he was no Jew.

069 14/11d: "It is not for us (Muhammad*) to bring you an authority - - -". = something that really proves the claims. One of Muhammad's many "explanations" for why it never was possible for him to prove anything.

070 14/11e: "It is not for us (claimed earlier prophets*) to bring an authority except as Allah permits". Muhammad never was able to prove one atom of his central claims. Here in his tale the situation was the same for claimed former prophets = Muhammad's inability to prove anything was normal for prophets - at least this is Muhammad's not proved claim. Also see 9/98b above. But here he keeps an opening open: If Allah will. Which explains why some Jewish prophets included Jesus and even f. ex. Paul made miracles - Allah did it.

071 14/11f: "And in Allah let all men of faith put their trust". Rather risky as long as there are no proofs and not even any reliable indication for that he exists - and if he exists; is he from dark or good forces? - he is no god if he is behind the Quran, as too much is wrong in that book for a good to have been involved.

##072 14/12a: “No reason have we (Muslims*) why we should not put our trust in Allah”. Wrong. All the mistakes, etc. in the Quran proves 100% that it is not from a god. And all the mistaken facts which are in accordance with wrong science in the Middle East at the time of Muhammad, strongly indicate that it is made by one or more humans in Arabia at the time of Muhammad. In both cases the religion is a made up one, and Allah may not even exist. In addition one has the fact that Muhammad simply lied when it fitted him and did not even respect his own oaths. There is every reason for not putting any trust in Allah. Similar claim in 5/84.

073 14/12b: “No reason have we (Muslims*) why we should not put our trust in Allah”. Very wrong f.x. for believers in Yahweh.

074 14/12c: "Indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

075 14/12d: "Indeed He (Allah*) has guided us (Muslims*) to the Way we (follow)". But going where? - with a guidebook full of mistakes and not from a guide/(god)! (If Allah here should happen to be from the dark forces, then "bonne voyage" - - - and mercy to the followers!)

076 14/12e: "- - - certainly - - -". See 2/2b above.

077 14/12f: “For those who put their trust should put their trust in Allah.” Wrong. See 14/12a+d above.

078 14/12g: “For those who put their trust should put their trust in Allah.” Incompatible with the Bible.

079 14/13a: "- - - the Unbelievers said - - -: 'Be sure we shall - - -'". See 14/10i above.

080 14/13b: "- - - Unbelievers - - -". Any non-Muslim.

081 14/13c: "- - - revealed - - -". See 13/1f above.

082 14/13d: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

083 14/13e: "We (Allah*) shall cause the wrongdoers to perish". See 3/77b above.

084 14/13f: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". Normally "Quran-speak" for non-Muslims.

085 14/14a: "- - - Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

086 14/14b: "- - - such as fear the Time when they shall stand before My tribunal - - -". = Muslims.

087 14/14c: "- - - My (Allah's*) tribunal - - -". The Day of Doom - but also see 3/77b above.

088 14/15: "- - - transgressor - - -". One of Muhammad's negative names for non-Muslims.

089 14/16: "- - - he is given, for drink, boiling water - - -". Also in Hell you need food and drink.

090 14/17: Hell is pure and brutal sadism. Is it fair punishment for the after all limited sins most sinners have made?

091 14/18a: The same parable should be usable for the Muslims, as the Quran is from no god - no god delivers that quality.

092 14/18b: "- - - straying far, far (from the goal)". As the Quran with all its errors is not from any god, this may be the fate of the Muslims, too. But perhaps not for all non-Muslims - some may be believing in a real god.

093 14/19a: "Seest thou not that Allah created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". No, in this case we only see a book so full of mistakes that it is not from a god. Such a not documented claim in such a book, has no value.

094 14/19b: “- - - Allah created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved - and possible to claim on behalf of any god as long as no proof is required.

095 14/19c: “- - - Allah created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth in Truth - - -”. It is impossible to know if it is true, as long as the Quran only offers words and not a single proof. Words are very cheap - especially when it is clear that there are MANY mistakes etc. in the book. Also see 11/7a above.

096 14/19ca: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

097 14/19cb: "- - - in Truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

098 14/19d: “If He (Allah*) so will - - -". This and similar sentences you often meet in the Quran. Muhammad tells about what Allah could/can do if he only will. The point, though, is that he seems never to will. It is like when you hear boys or youths or immature adults trying to impress others with powers or riches or something they in reality do not have - bragging, if you want. Or bluffing?

But who except for immature persons rely on bluffs in real life? - cheats, deceivers, swindlers, etc. - the same persons who like blind belief and no difficult questions from their victims.

099 14/19e: “If He (Allah*) so will, He can remove you (man*) and put (in your place) a new Creation”. At least he never did so - able to or not.

100 14/20: "Nor is that for Allah any great matter." If he exists, and if the Quran has told the truth about him and his power.

101 14/21a: "They (non-Muslims*) will all be marshaled before Allah together - - -" - at the Day of Doom.

102 14/21b: "They (non-Muslims*) will all be marshaled before Allah together - - -". Contradiction: According to the Bible the Day of Doom is marshaled by Yahweh, not by Allah.

103 14/21c: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". See 3/77b above.

104 14/21d: "- - - the guidance (the Quran*) of Allah* - - -". Little guidance in a crooked guidebook.

105 14/22a: “It was Allah who gave you a promise of Truth (the Quran*) - - -.” With that many mistakes the Quran at best is partly true. Also see 2/2b above.

106 14/22aa: "- - - Truth - - -". See 2/2b above.

107 14/22b: "- - - reproach your (sinners'*) own souls (for sinning*)". Why? Why, when the Quran so clearly and so often states that Allah decides everything and has 100% predestination? It was Allah who decided that you should sin - how can he then punish you for it when he forced you to do it? As for "free will for man" which the Quran and Muslims blame, that is not even theoretically possible when there is full predestination by Allah - even Islam has given in explaining how that can be possible. (But Islam cannot drop the claimed free will - for one thing there then will be more mistakes in the Quran, and the religion a false one, and for another Allah then will be a morally very bad god, punishing man for sins he himself has forced them to do. Therefore they say: "Even if it is impossible, it all the same must be true, because Allah says so in the Quran" (A6/141) - likely the lamest of all "explanations" you meet from Islam. In the immaterial sphere of existence there are things impossible even for omnipotent gods.) Also see 3/154e, 6/149a, and 7/34a above and not least 16/35e below.

108 14/22d: (14/A32): “I (the Devil*) cannot listen to your cries (for help*), nor can ye (sinners in Hell*) listen to mine”. Or does it really mean: “I cannot respond to your call for help, just as you should not have, in your lifetime, responded to my call”? Islam simply does not know. And these variants of course also are in the Arab text, as the relevant word(s) there has/have more than one meaning. Clear language in the Quran?

109 14/22e: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". In the Quran this word normally means non-Muslims - one of Muhammad’s negative names for them.

110 14/22f: "- - - grievous Penalty". See 3/77b above.

111 14/23a: Rather like 13/35 above, with the addition: “Their greeting therein will be: ‘Peace’” This word is about the only one referred to as permitted talk in Paradise, in all the Quran. The intellectual level is just not indicated to be high there.

112 14/23b: "- - - those who believe - - -". = Muslims - only Muslims believe according to the Quran.

113 14/23c: "- - - righteousness - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

114 14/23d: "- - - Gardens - - -". Paradise. See 10/9 f below.

115 14/23e: "- - - Gardens beneath which rivers flow - - -". The most frequently used Arabism in the Quran.

116 14/23f: "- - - to dwell therein (Paradise*) for aye - - -". 11/108c hints that it may not be forever.

117 14/24: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

118 14/24-25: This must be understood like if a man brings forth good deeds, he will receive admonition. And of course the best of deeds was to go to war when Muhammad wanted.

119 14/26a: "- - - evil Words - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

120 14/26b: An evil tree - and thus a not good Muslim - will be uprooted and thrown away (to Hell of course). Also see 14/24-25 above.

121 14/27a: "- - - those who believe - - -". = Muslims - only Muslims believe according to the Quran.

122 14/27b: “- - - with the Word (the Quran*) that stands firm - - -.” Can words with that many mistakes and bent logic, etc. like in the Quran stand firm on other platforms than cheating, brain washing, pressure and wish for power?

123 14/27c: "- - - Allah will leave to stray, those who do wrong. Allah doeth what He willeth". 4 facts: "The lost lamb", etc. And "the 11. hour" (Luke 15/8-10 and 15/11-31 + Matt. 18/12-14 and 20/8-13). One more fact: Here is so deep difference between the Quran and the Bible that only this point alone proves that Allah and Yahweh is not the same god - and remember: Science has proved that also the claim in the Quran that the Bible is falsified, is wrong. And Islam has proved the same even stronger by not finding any falsifications at all among all the old manuscripts.

124 14/27d: "- - - do wrong - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. Refusing to raid or go to war for Muhammad, f. ex. was very wrong.

125 14/27e: "Allah doeth what He willeth". Allah decides everything - and from other places in the Quran, we know he decides according to his inflexible Plan which nobody and nothing can change.

126 14/28a: "- - - those who have changed the favor of Allah into blasphemy - - -". Non-Muslims or persons who have left Islam.

127 14/28b: "- - - blasphemy - - -". Nothing here is blasphemy unless Allah really exists and is a god. (How do you f.x. blaspheme him if he belongs to the dark forces?)

128 14/28c: "- - - the House of Perdition". = Hell.

129 14/30a: "- - - the Path - - -". = The road to the Muslim paradise.

130 14/30b: "But, verily, ye (non-Muslims*) are making straightway to Hell!" Only if the Quran is from a god and in addition is telling the full truth and only the truth.

131 14/30c: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

132 14/31a: "- - - my (Allah's*) servants who have believed, that they may establish regular prayers - - -". This seems to be about persons who have left Islam - a wish that they shall return (this was in 621-622 AD before Muhammad was able to use force).

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not, many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

133 14/31b: "- - - regular prayers - - -". This demand for regular prayers - 5 times a day - was so essential for Allah (he even wanted more often according to Hadiths) that it became one of the 5 "pillars" of Islam. For Yahweh such formalism was so totally without any interest, that any similar rule is not at all mentioned in the whole Bible. One of the 100% for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

134 14/31c:"- - - the Sustenance We (Allah*) have given them (Muslims*) - - -". It is Allah who gives you everything (and as everything is predestined and you will get what Allah has decided, then why work?)

135 14/31d: "- - - a Day - - -". In this case the Day of Doom.

136 14/32a: "It is Allah Who hath created the heavens (plural and wrong*) the earth - - -". See 11/7a above.

137 14/32b: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22d.

138 14/32c: "It is Allah Who - - - sendeth down ea in from the skies - - -". See 11/7a above.

139 14/32d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) who hath made the ships subject to you, that they may sail across the sea by His command - - -." No comments.

140 14/33a: "And He (Allah*) hat made subject to you the sun and the moon - - -". Are the sun and the moon really subjects to humans?

141 14/33b: "- - - and the Night and the Day hath He (Allah*) (also) made subject to you". See 14/33a just above.

142 14/33-34: These words are quite big - - - and as normal for the Quran never proved.

143 14/34a: "And He (Allah*) giveth you (Muslims*) of all that ye ask for". A questionable claim - we have met a lot of dissatisfied Muslims.

144 14/34b: "- - - if ye (people*) count the favors of Allah, never will ye be able to number them". Similar often claimed, but never proved. Also see 11/7a above.

145 14/34c: "Verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

146 14/34d: "- - - injustice - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

147 14/35a: "- - - Abraham - - -". A historical anomaly.

148 14/35b: “Remember Abraham said: ’O my Lord! Make this city (Mecca*) one of peace and security; - - - “. Abraham never visited Mecca. Besides: There was no city at the time of Abraham – this both according to reality and to the Quran. Remember how Hagar run back and forth there without finding people and without finding water. And even the nearby verse 14/37 mentions a valley, but no town. Mecca as a town was only some generations old at the time of Muhammad - some 2500 years after Abraham. Wrong and a contradiction with both the Quran and with reality. Also see 2/127a above and 14/35c just below.

149 14/35c: “Remember Abraham said: ’O my Lord! Make this city (Mecca*) one of peace and security; - - - “. Contradicted also by the Bible. The Bible gives Abraham's movements from he arrived in Canaan and till he died (1. Mos. ch.12 - 25). He according to this never was within hundreds of miles (or kilometers) from Mecca - at that time just a dry, somewhat narrow desert valley in the middle of nowhere. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

150 14/36a: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

151 14/36b: "(Allah is*) Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful". See the comment to f.x. 1/1a and 14/8b above.

152 14/36c: "- - - I (Abraham*) - - -". A historical anomaly.

153 14/37a: "- - - I (Abraham*) have made some of my offspring to dwell in a valley without cultivation - - -". It here is referred to Muhammad’s never documented claim that Ishmael - Abraham's son out of wedlock with the slave girl Hagar - settled in Mecca (which did not exist then, but is situated in a dry, quite narrow desert valley)". This is directly contradicted by the Bible, which clearly states that Ishmael and his descendants settled on the border of Egypt some place north of the Red Sea (1. Mos.25/18: "His (Ishmaels*) descendants settled in the area from Havilah to Shur, near the border of Egypt - - -"). And NB: This was written down at least 1ooo years before there was any reason for the writers not to give correct information. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

But to claim to descend from Abraham gave both Muhammad and his new religion weight. Such things have been done many a time through history.

154 14/37b: "- - - a valley without cultivation - - -". Remember this when Muslims claim Abraham lived in or near the Valley of Mecca when he sent away Hagar and Ishmael, and that they therefore ended up living in that valley and town (the town/city did not exist then, also according to the Quran - Hagar could not find people at all). This valley was a dry and rather narrow desert valley - according to the Quran not even the Zamzam well existed then. Abraham was a rich nomad with big flocks of all kinds of domesticated animals - so big that according to the Bible Lot and he had to split up because their flocks were so big that the land could not feed and water them when they stayed together (1. Mos. 13/5-9). A man with so big flocks of animals should travel with his everything deep into the desert and settle in a dry desert valley without food or water for his animals - and far from where he lived in Canaan - now ca. central Israel west of Jordan. This on top of everything else we know about Abraham and his travels.

Believe it who is able to. (Singular with a reason - there cannot be many, except perhaps in religious blindness.)

And even more: When Lot and Abraham split up, Lot choose the eastern part with Jordan Valley and down along the Dead Sea (where it is likely Sodom and Gomorra lay) - and thus the "neighborhood" of the border of Arabia - whereas Abraham settled in Canaan = further west towards the Mediterranean Sea. To get to Mecca a normal way, he thus had to cross all the territory of Lot with his huge flocks of animals, and march some 750 miles (some 1200 km) away from home, partly through harsh desert, to get to Mecca - a place where nothing existed at that time.

Any further comments necessary?

155 "- - - the Sacred House - - -". This refers to the Kabah Mosque in Mecca. To take its history according to Islam:

It was originally built by Adam. Now, science and for that kind religion, believe that if Eden ever existed, it was in the wetlands of what is now South Iraq. All the same Adam went all the way from his home in or outside Eden, to this dry desert valley some months grueling march to the west, and built a big mosque there - what for we have never heard any Muslim explain.

But during the Big Flood and during the millenias the mosque was destroyed. Some say that Noah repaired it, but that time passed and wore it down. when Ishmael grew old enough to be a helper - it is not said how old - Abraham, therefore, rebuilt the big mosque. No Muslim have ever explained us why he built it so big for just his own after all small family, or why he built it a thousand miles from where he lived - and thus a place where he and his family never could use it, and in a place where still nearly no-one lived.

But new millennia took its toll. Some years before Muhammad became a Muslim, the Kabah was rebuilt. But the now rich merchant city could not afford to use the foundations of Abraham - that big he had built his far of and far into the wilderness mosque for his family. The rich Mecca had to build smaller.

There are times one starts wonder what brainwashing - included religious such - does to a man's brain and his ability to use his brain.

The very plain story is that neither Adam, nor Noah, nor Abraham, nor any other biblical person ever was in the Mecca Valley, not to mentioned built anything on a mosque there. But it is good propaganda as long as anyone believes it. Also see 2/127a above.

156 14/37c: "- - - Sacred House - - -". The Kabah in Mecca. Muhammad claimed its original foundation was made by Adam, and its next one by Abraham and Ishmael = some 3800 - 4ooo years old. In addition to all the other improbabilities here which deny this, it today is possible to find out how old the oldest parts of Kabah are. As far as we know, Islam has not tried to find out - their own belief in the Quran is not strong enough to run the risk of finding an age of f. ex. 1900 years.

Besides they have a problem: They will have to use a non-Muslim expert to find out. Because of al-Taqiyya no-one will really believe any Muslim claiming he has found an age of f.x. 3850 years for Abraham's stones (f.x. the one with his claimed foot-marks), and f.x. some 5700 for Noah's part if he was involved, not to mention if they found an age compatible with Adam's life.

157 14/37d: "- - - regular prayers - - -". This demand for regular prayers - 5 times a day - was so essential for Allah (he even wanted more often according to Hadiths) that it became one of the 5 "pillars" of Islam. For Yahweh such formalism was so totally without any interest, that any similar rule is not at all mentioned in the whole Bible. One of the 100% for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not, many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

158 14/38a: "Truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

159 14/38b: "Truly Thou (Allah*) dost know what we (humans*) conceal and what we reveal: for nothing whatever is hidden from Allah - - -". See 2/233h above."

160 14/39a: "Praise be to Allah - - -". This is said by Abraham, but the Bible contradicts and says Abraham's god was Yahweh, not Allah.

161 14/39b: "Praise be to Allah who granted unto me (Abraham*) in old age Ishmael and Isaac - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Ishmael was a result of Sarah's wish for children in the family (1. Mos. 16/1-4), and Isaac was given by Yahweh (1. Mos. 18/10). Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

162 14/39c: "- - - granted unto me (Abraham*) in old age Ishmael and Isaac - - -". 3 historical anomalies.

163 14/39d: "- - - truly - - -". See 2/2b above.

164 14/39e: "- - - the Hearer of Prayer (here indicated Allah*)!" One thing is that Allah can hear no prayers unless he exists. Another: Prayers what for - if what the Quran tells that Allah predestines everything years and decades and more on beforehand, and that nothing can change his predestination, prayers just is naive waste of time in Islam - they can change nothing.

165 14/40a: "- - - make me (Abraham*) one - - -". A historical anomaly.

166 14/40b: "- - - regular prayers - - -". This demand for regular prayers - 5 times a day - was so essential for Allah (he even wanted more often according to Hadiths) that it became one of the 5 "pillars" of Islam. For Yahweh such formalism was so totally without any interest, that any similar rule is not at all mentioned in the whole Bible. One of the 100% for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

167 14/40c: "And accept Thou (here indicated Allah*) my (Abraham's*) prayer". What for? If everything is predestined like the Quran states many places, prayer have no effect - nothing can be changed.

As for the value of prayers in Islam, also see 62/9c. And if you combine 62/9c with 67/9c - a strong one - you get something thought-provoking. (And relevant here: Muslims often are thought that a question or problem can have 2 or more true and correct solutions - Islam is forced to teach this, because if not, many of the mistakes and contradictions in the Quran become too obvious. But this ONLY is true if parallel true solutions are possible. In cases where 2 or more possible solutions are mutually excluding each other, maximum 1 of the mutually excluding ones can be true. It should be a bit thought provoking for Muslims, that just this "small" difference in theoretical thinking and teaching, was one of the reasons (there were several of course) for why Europe and the West exploded into the Technical Revolution, while the Muslim area stagnated). Two star examples are: 1) Full predestination is not possible even for an omnipotent god to combine with even the smallest piece of free will for man - the two are mutually excluding. The same for full and unchangeable predestination long time before, combined with any claimed effect of prayers - the two are mutually excluding each other.)

168 14/41a: "- - - Thy (here indicated Allah*) Forgiveness - - -". Allah can forgive nothing unless he exists and is a god.

169 14/41b: "- - - Believers - - -". = Muslims.

170 14/41c: "- - - the Day that the Reckoning will be established!" The Day of Doom.

171 14/42a: "Think not that Allah doth not heed the deeds of those who do wrong. He but gives them a respite against a Day (the Day of Doom*) - - -". One more - and a much used - "explanation" for why bad people often had a good life.

172 14/42b: "- - - do wrong - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. Refusing to raid or go to war for Muhammad, f.x. was very wrong.

173 14/42c: "- - - a Day (of Doom*) when the eyes (of non-Muslims*) will fixedly stare in horror - - -". See 3/77b above.

174 14/42d: "- - - a Day (of Doom*) when the eyes (of non-Muslims*) will fixedly stare in horror - - -". The Day of Doom.

175 14/44a: "- - - the Day when the Wrath will reach them (the non-Muslims*) - - -". = The Day of Doom.

176 14/44b: "- - - wrongdoers - - -". In the Quran this word normally means "non-Muslims" - a nice name created by Muhammad and used by Muslims and Islam.

177 14/45: "- - - men who wronged their own souls - - -". See 14/22b above.

178 14/46: "- - - indeed - - -". See 2/2b above.

179 14/47a: "Never think that Allah would fail His messengers in His promise - - -". That will highly depend on if Allah exists, if he is behind the Quran, and if the Quran on top of this tells the full truth and only the truth. But good propaganda for stiffening up the power of Muhammad.

180 14/47c: "Never think that Allah would fail His messengers in His promise - - -". There never was a proved case neither of Allah giving a promise, nor of keeping one - neither to a prophet, not to anybody else. If such a proved case had existed, every person on this Earth had been told about it - and repeatedly.

181 14/47c: "- - - Allah is Exalted in Power - - -". Often claimed, not one single time in 1400 years unmistakably proved. (Jesus and Yahweh at least proved both their existence and their powers if either the Bible or the Quran or both tells the truth on this point.)

182 14/47d: "- - - (Allah is*) the Lord of Retribution". In that case f.x. 3/77b may be understandable.

183 14/48a: "One day the Earth will be changed to a different Earth, and so will the Heavens (plural and wrong*) - - -." Unclear what it means - the Quran sports a very clear language sometimes. Muslims guess it refers to the changes on Earth at the Day of Doom, but few tell why there will be a new heaven, except vague guesses for "changes for something even better" (which would not take much, as the Islamic Paradise just is a luxury earthly life + plenty of women/sex - and for Muslim women even less".

184 14/48b: “- - - Heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See2/22.

185 14/48c: "- - - (men) will be marshaled forth, before Allah (on the Day of Doom*" - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says the god present will be Yahweh, not Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

186 14/48d: "- - - Allah, the One, the Irresistible". Similar often claimed, but never proved - and words are cheap.

187 14/49a: (A14/64): “And thou (Muslims*) will see the sinners that day (of Doom*) bound together in fetters - - -.” In real fetters? Or is it a metaphor for their evil deeds (Razi)? Or perhaps a picture of the chain reaction their bad deeds caused in this life (Asad)? Your guess is as good as ours and theirs, and neither the Quran nor Islam can answer – but would a real god leave so much of his holy book to sheer guesswork? Any topic in the Quran Muslims still after all these centuries are unable to understand or agree on, are proved insufficiently or not clearly enough explained – and any omniscient and clairvoyant god had long before he sent down (?) the book, known which points needed better or clearer explanation. Then who made the Quran with its often unclear words and meanings?

188 14/49b: "...Sinners..." Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

189 14/49-50: “And thou (Muhammad/Muslims*) wilt see the Sinners that day (Day of Doom*) bound together in fetters - their garments of liquid, and their faces cowered with Fire”. A bad place and distress similar to the most painful possible on Earth. Also see 3/77b above.

190 14/51a: "...Allah may (on the Day of Doom*) requite each soul according to its deserts..." Once more contradicted by the Bible, which says this will be done by Yahweh, not by Allah. Also see 67/9c below - a strong one. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

191 14/51b: (YA1930): “And verily Allah is swift to call into account.” Does this mean: Even if the “infidels” do well in life, it only means that Allah is waiting, and will react swiftly when his time comes? Or: Allah will work swiftly with the “infidels” at the Day of Doom? No Muslim can tell you the answer for sure.

192 14/51b: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

193 14/51d: "- - - Allah is Swift in calling to account". See 3/77b above.

194 14/52a: "Here is a message (the Quran*) for mankind - - -". Ok, but from whom? No god ever was involved in a book of a quality like the Quran, so who then? Dark forces? A sick brain? A cold brain? - or a combination of 2 or 3 of these?

195 14/52b: "- - - He is (no other than) Allah (the only god*) - - -". But see 2/255a above.

196 14/52c: "- - - men of understanding - - -". See 13/3j above.

Surah 14: Sub-total 196 + 8299 = 8495 comments.

000000000000000000000000000000000000

NB: If you find any mistakes anywhere, please inform us. If it is a real mistake, it will be corrected. Please also inform us if we have overlooked points or errors.

000000000000000000000000000000000000

(A6/92 - English 2008 edition A6/93): "- - - it is in the nature of man to regard the beliefs which have been implanted in him(!) from his childhood, and which he now shares with his social environment, as the only true and possible one - - -". He forgot(?) to mention that this also goes for Muslims.

10/32: "- - - apart from the Truth, what (remains) but error?"


>>> Go to Next Surah

>>> Go to Previous Sura

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".