Comments in this book numbered by 3 numbers (included 00 or 0) a few places followed by one small letter = clear cases. Comments numbered by 00 or 0 followed by 1, 2 or 3 letters (big or small) = likely cases.
Not ready yet – more will be added not later than 2010.
Muslims are not always bent on fair play in debates - the main thing is to win the discussion, not how they wins it or what is right or wrong. We have a private small theory saying that may be it is the tradition for al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth) at work - and not only tradition; when it comes to defending or forwarding Islam, it is a duty to use it if it is necessary.
Even if we do not have this chapter ready for Internet yet, we will mention one recent exemple:
This happened to one of our out contacts on Internet (and we checked that it really was true) - on the pages for debate on the Internet edition of one of the two largest newspapers in Norway, Aftenposten. (www.aftenposten.no).
A rather activ person in the debates about Islam and about Muslims was an eager Muslim calling himself Kartal.
Now Kartal was not of the brightest and he was not one of the best educated ones. His arguments mostly did not meet success.
But he was clever with computers - and he found a way: He simply falsified "letters" pretending to be sent in by opponents that were too clever for him. If you are clever with computers, you can do a number of things on Internet.
In the "letters" - addressed to Kartal - the "opponents" admitted this and that, and sometimes really bad things like sex with small boys, etc. - - - and Kartal got good points against them.
One exemple: Alleged "letter" from the strong opponent XXX: "I admit that we Christians love to have sex with small boys". And the good and benevolent Kartal answered: "That is good XXX. Admittance is the first step"..
One thing is that no scentinent being admits things like this at a place where the police easily can trace you - and that tendencies to pedofeli are more or less equal for all the world - give or take a little for cultural, religious, etc. influsence (remember all the child slaves that were sent to Muslim areas - and few to the Americas). But in the short sentence he claimed XXX had sent, he - who was an immigrant - made no less than 4 grammatical errors (whereas XXX always wrote more or less perfect). And in addition search at the debate page among other things showed that XXX never in all his hundreds of lettere to that debate forum had used the word "smaagutter" (= small boys).
As said: Kartal had ideas, but not the necessary knowledge and intelligence.
But naturally people reacts to this kind of dishonesty. (But he was defending Islam, and then this kind of lies are laudable for Muslims - see the rules for al-Taqiyya).
But as mentioned Kartal was neither of the sharpest, nor well educated. He had ideas, but not the intelligence and knowledge to make the "letters" believable. He was quickly seen through.
All the same it is a small, but good everyday example of to what extremes and to what low levels some - we stress some - Muslims go to "kill" the ones that oppose against Islam.
And: KARTAL LIVED UP TO THE IDEALS AND THE ORDERS OF AL-TAQIYYA.
A final small point: In the book “The Message of the Quran”, certified by Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Islamic Research Academy in Cairo (one of the 2-3 top universities in the Muslim world on such subjects) in a letter dated 27. Dec. 1998, it is admitted rather reluctantly that there are no proofs for Allah, and that it is not possible to prove him. An additonal point here is that if there are no ptoof for Allah and impossible to ptove him, automatically there also is no proof for, and impossible to prove Muhammad's claimed connection to Allah.
THIS CHAPTER WILL BE FINISHED NOT LATER THAN 2010.