PART II, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter 4, Section 6 (= II-1-4-6)

MISTAKES AND ERRORS - MISTAKEN FACTS - IN THE QURAN, THE HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. THE "COMPLETE" LIST - THE "ENCYCLOPAEDIA" - BASED ON SURAH AND VERSE NUMBER

(PART II, CHAPTERS 1 - 10 included subchapters = MEGA MISTAKES, MISTAKES, ERRORS, CONTRADICTIONS, INVALID LOGIC, ABROGATIONS, ETC. IN THE QURAN - THE HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH. AT LEAST 100% PROOF FOR THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG - NO OMNISCIENT GOD MAKES MISTAKES)

For the fact mistakes and errors based on themes, see Part II, Chapter 1, Subchapter 3, Sections 1 through 16.

SOME CLEAR FACT MISTAKES AND ERRORS IN SURAHS 41 THROUGH 60 IN THE QURAN - THE HOLY BOOK OF MUHAMMAD, MUSLIMS, ISLAM, AND ALLAH

Comments numbered by 3 numbers (included 00 or 0) a few places followed by one small letter = clear mistakes. Comments numbered by 00 or 0 followed by 1, 2 or 3 letters (big or small) = likely mistake.

SURAH 41:

001 41/2: “A revelation (the Quran*) from (Allah) - - -”. See 38/29 and 40/75.

*002 41/3: “A Book (the Quran*) whereof the verses are explained in detail - - -”. Many verses are not explained in detail - see f. ex. all the extra explanations that has been necessary concerning Islamic laws.

003 41/9a: “(Allah first*) created the earth in two Days - - -”. Wrong. Earth was far from created first. The universe was created some 13.7 billion years ago – our sun and the Earth some 4.6 billion years ago (or actually 4.57 billion) - - - and trillions of stars and most likely plants were created in the more than 9 billion years in between. Any god had known, but Muhammad not. Then who created the Quran?

004 41/9b: “(Allah*) created the earth in two Days - - -”. Wrong. It took the better part of 4.6 billion years to get it like today - and hundreds of million years just to make it fit for life.

005 41/9c: “- - - the Worlds - - -“. The famous 7 flat Earths of the Quran – one above the other and named, according to f. ex. Al-Bukhari. See 65/12.

***006 41/9-12: “(Allah*) created the earth in two Days - - -. He set on the (earth) mountains standing firm high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth, and measured therein all things to give them (living entities*) nourishment in due proportions, in four Days - - - (and*) So he completed them (the sky*) as seven firmaments, in two Days - - -”. This makes 8 days - very inconsistent and very wrong compared to what the Quran normally says: 6 days. (Not to mention the 4.6 billion years science has found out). One more contradiction. We have been told we have to be very stupid who does not understand that the two first days are included in the next four. We admit that is the only way Islam can try to “explain” this away - but that very clearly is not what the text says. (“The Message of the Quran” has “doctored” the Quran a little (at least in the Swedish translation) to make the “explanation” not quite so dumb - but only “not quite so”, as Yusuf Ali’s translation is very clear).

007 41/10a: “He set on the (earth) mountains standing firm, high above it - - -“. Wrong. The mountains were not set (down) on Earth – they grew up.

008 41/10b: “He set on the (earth) mountains standing firm - - - - - and measured therein all things to give them (animals or humans?*) nourishment in due proportions, in 4 days - - -”. Wrong. That took millions of years - only the cooling down of the Earth to make any kind of life possible, took at least 300 million years. And the development from the first life to the first real animal took some 2.5 - 3 billion years. That happened in late Pre-Cambrium, in the periode that a few years ago was named Ediacarian, which makes up the end of the long Pre-Cambrium periode some 500 – 550 million years ago. (And then animal life “exploded” during the period named Cambrium.)

***009 41/11a: “- - - it (the sky) had been (as) smoke - - -)”. The sky according to Muhammad was something material (the stars were fastened to the lowermost heaven, f. ex.) and had to be made from something. But it is wrong. The sky as we see it, is just an optical illusion.

Some Muslims discover the Big Bang and the cloudlike state after that, and in triumph present you for this “proof” of Islam being scientific and correct. But the Big Bang happened 13.7 billion years ago according to science. The cloudlike state lasted for 300ooo – 380ooo years and was not clouds (micro particles floating in gas) but only ionized gas, mainly hydrogen + a little helium. - - And our sun and earth did not coalesce until 9 billion years later – 4.6 billion years ago - and are on top of all 3. generation creations. The connection between the "clouds" after the Big Bang and Earth is highly feeble and has nothing to do with our sky.

More logical but less frequently quoted, are the tales saying the sky was made from the cloud of dust and gas slowly coalescing into the sun, the planets, etc. But that material ended up as the sun, the planets, etc. - an optical illusion like our sky is not made from gas or dust or clouds. It is made from the bending of light in near vacuum only. (And the illusion that makes the night sky seem like a hemisphere is made by our inability to see the 3. dimension at those distances). See 41/11c below.

010 41/11b: “Come ye (Earth and sky*) together - - -”. Earth and sky never were separated in two parts that then could come together. (Islam tries to explain that what is meant is gas, mainly H2 – hydrogen. But hydrogen – or other gases - has nothing to do with smoke – any god had known. (Smoke = micro particles “diluted” in gas – without the particles no smoke).

***011 41/11c: “He (Allah*) said to it (the sky) and the earth: ’Come ye together - - -’”. The sky as we see it by day is just an optical illusion that is a result of the refraction - bending - of light in the rarefied upper atmosphere - it is blue because blue light bends the least. It simply is physical laws at work - there is no question of “coming together”.

The night sky is another optical illusion - the day sky and the night sky are not even “made” in the same way. Here we see a sky because we are unable to see 3 dimensions at those distances. At night it is if possible even more wrong to talk about things coming together.Any god knew this. Muhammad believed in the local wrong astronomy. Who composed the Quran?

012 41/12a: “- - - seven firmaments - - -”. Wrong - there are no 7 heavens. (Firmament is another name for the heaven or sky – mainly used for the night sky).

*013 41/12b: “So He (Allah*) completed them as seven firmaments in two Days - - -”. If the Quran hear means the sky as seen by day, it took as many years as it took the atmosphere to form - some million years. If he means the starry night sky - which most often is meant when one uses the word “firmament” - it all started 13.7 billion years ago according to science, and may be the first stars became visible not much later - - - and the creation is still not completed.

**014 41/12c: “He (Allah*) assigned to each heaven its duty and command”. How could he do that when there were no 7 heavens?

***015 41/12d: “And We (Allah*) adorned the lower heaven with lights (= stars*) - - -”. This is one of the points Muslims are very reluctant to try to explain, as it is obviously and impossibly wrong - and impossible to “explain” away in any believable manner. We know from old astronomy that the moon and the planets were fastened to different heavens, and that means that the stars have to be between us and the moon - at less than some 384ooo km distance - as the stars were fastened to the lowest heaven. (The Quran also says that the sun (?) and the moon are between the heavens). In addition to all the other impossibilities, humans would not be even crisps in a millisecond. Once more: Any existing god knew this, Muhammad not. Is Allah non-existing? Or who composed the Quran?

***016 41/12e: “- - - and (provided it) (the lowest heaven*) with guard”. We know from other places in the Quran, that this “guard” is stars mistaken for shooting stars used against bad spirits wanting to spy on the heavens. The only place such “information” fits today, is in fairy tales. Who composed the Quran?

*017 41/12f: “(Allah is*) full of Knowledge.” Something is wrong. Either Allah is not omniscient - then he may have sent down the Quran. Or he is full of knowledge - omniscient. Then he did not send down a book like the Quran with that many mistakes - see 41/75. If not Allah, then who composed the Quran?

018 41/15: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

Besides: In the book “The Message of the Quran”, certified by Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Islamic Research Academy in Cairo (one of the 2-3 top universities in the Muslim world on such subjects) in a letter dated 27. Dec. 1998, it is admitted rather reluctantly that there are no proofs for Allah, and that it is not possible to prove him. An additonal point here is that if there are no ptoof for Allah and impossible to ptove him, automatically there also is no proof for, and impossible to prove Muhammad's claimed connection to Allah.

019 41/28: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

020 41/30: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for the ones not suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen riches, and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid that got – and get – a lot of power in addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the small percentage of people who need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan religion was not strong enough.

*021 41/37a: “Among His (Allah’s*) Signs are the Night and the Day - - -”. The night and the day are made by the sun and the revolving of the Earth - physical facts at work. If Islam states the sun and the Earth and the physical laws are made by Allah, they will have to prove it - it is nowhere proved neither in the Quran nor in the Hadiths - cheap words and invalid signs anyone can use, f. ex. any priest in any religion: Baal made the sun and makes it rise in the east. Allah can neither unmake it nor make it rise in the west - then Baal is a real god and Allah a false one. It only is cheap words that prove not a thing, except that resorting to such faked arguments are among the hallmarks of cheats, swindlers, and deceivers, which may prove or indicate something or other about the one(s) using such arguments.

022 41/37b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

023 41/39c: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

024 41/39: “He (Allah*) Who gives life to the (dead) earth (by sending rain*)”. Earth which comes alive just by adding water, is not dead - only looks like that. It is alive with seeds and perhaps roots.

025 41/40a: “- - - the Truth - - -“. With all these mistakes, etc., the Quran at best is partly true.

**026 41/40b: “Those who pervert the Truth in Our (Allah’s) Signs - - -.” It is not possible to pervert the truth in invalid signs, they are already invalid - not one (with the possible exceptions of a few pointing to another god, Yahweh, taken from the Bible) has any value as signs or proofs, as they without exception are logically invalid, because they all are hanging in the air – just unproven claims - or resting on other invalid - not proved - “statements”, “signs” or “proofs”. Any priest in any religion can say the same about his god(s). A real god would not use invalid “signs” and “proofs”, proofs he had to know would be seen through sooner or later. (Actually it has been seen through long time ago, but the weight of the number of believers and Islam’s rules for social or real murder of the ones thinking “heresy” even if it is the full truth, make it roll on - away from the real god if such one exists, and if Islam is wrong.)

027 41/40c: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

028 41/42a: “No falsehood can approach it (the Quran*) - - -”. No comments, except see 40/75 and many others.

029 41/42b: “- - - One (Allah*) Full of Wisdom - - -“. The way Allah is manifested in the Quran, he is very far from full of wisdom.

00a 41/42c: “- - - Worthy of all Prise.” Is a claimed, but never proved deity that makes so many mistakes worthy of all praise? Hardly.

030 41/43: “Nothing is said to thee (Muhammad*) that was not said to the messengers before thee (f. ex. Jesus and the old Jewish prophets*) - - -.” Wrong. As science thoroughly has proved that the Bible is not falsified – and especially not NT – it is very clear that what Muhammad claimed to have been told, often is far from what the real (?) prophets and patriarchs had been told. And this is strengthened by the fact that it very often is very clear that Muhammad took his “biblical” stories not from the Bible, but from religious legends (often even based on apocryphal scriptures and stories, not the Bible) that circulated in the area, and that Muhammad believed was from the Bible - - - and then later he had only one way out how to explain the errors compared to the real Bible: He was right and the Bible falsified!!!. As for the quotation above, it is not true that nothing was said to Muhammad that was not said to earlier (real) prophets – a fact that Islam even confirms sometimes – f. ex. in the statement from Muhammad that he was the first “messenger/prophet” that had got permission from the god to steal and rob and rape, which the god according to the Quran even confirms is “god and lawful”.

031 41/44: “It (the Quran*) is a Guide - - -”. A book containing that many mistakes - see 40/75 - is no real guide. Or it is a guide to something inhuman.

032 41/45: “We (Allah*) certainly gave Moses the Book aforetime - - -”. Wrong. Those books were written much later according to science. (Moses according to the Bible only got the 10 commandments in writing. In addition he got the law verbally – parts of what now is “the Book of Moses” (actually the first 5 books in the Bible) – which he himself wrote down later. Nothing else. And as said: Science confirms that the Torah - the Book of Moses - is centuries younger than Moses).

033 41/53a: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

034 41/53b: “- - - this (the Quran*) is the Truth.” See 40/75.

Surah 41: At least 34 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.

SURAH 42:

001 42/3a: “Thus doth (He (Allah*)) send inspiration (a lot of the verses were “sent by inspiration” - easy - - - and easy to falsify*) to thee (Muhammad*) - - -.” Verses and surahs so full of errors were not sent by an omniscient god.

002 42/3b: “- - - (Allah is*) full of Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.

003 42/4: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

004 42/5: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

005 42/7a: “Thus have We (Allah*) sent by inspiration to the - - -.” See 42/3a above.

006 42/7b: “- - - the Day of Assembly (the Day of Doom*), of which there is no doubt - - -”. In a book with as many mistakes (see 40/75) there is reason for doubting anything:

1. Is Allah omnipotent and made the Quran? – or not?
2. Is Allah omnipotent, and did not make the Quran? Also the fact that many of the mistakes etc. in the book are in accordance with what was good knowledge and science in Arabia at the time of Muhammad, makes one wonder:
3. Did some human in Arabia make the Quran? - that would explain a lot.
4. Is there a Hell? – and in case is the description in the Quran correct? – there are so many other mistakes in the book.
5. Is there a Day of Doom? – and in case is it run by Allah? – or by Yahweh? – or by some other god(s)?
6. Is there a Paradise? – and is it in case a paradise for the body like in the Quran? – or for the soul like in the Bible? – or something else.

This is a problem with the Quran: There are so many mistakes that there are reasons for doubting anything, and impossible to know if something is true, and in that case what? What is true? What is al-Taqiyya? – what is plainly and simply wrong?

A last day will come for man sometimes in the future – but as there are so much wrong in the Quran, there is every reason to doubt that the description (or even existence) of Allah, and then consequently to believe that the description of Allah’s arrangement of the last day also is wrong.

And what about each and every Muslim if the Quran is partly or completely wrong, and they because of threats, social pressure or simply by the glorified plain and blind belief have not had the chance to find out in time? If there is nothing after this life, they will have lost nothing – except they have made this life difficult or a hell or worse for many. But if there is something afterwards, it may be a rude awakening, because there only is one thing that is sure about the Quran: No god – omniscient or not – made (not to mention revered in his own Heaven) a book with that many mistakes, contradictions, etc., and with that much invalid logic and as invalid “signs” and “proofs”.

007 42/11: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

008 42/12: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

009 42/13a: “The same religion has He (Allah*) established - - - (as that of Noah*)”. With all the mistakes (see f. ex. 40/75) there are good reasons for asking if it really is an omnipotent god that made this religion.

**010 42/13b: “The same religion (Islam*) has He (Allah*) established for - - - Abraham, Moses, and Jesus”. Neither the Quran, nor Hadith, nor Islam has brought the slightest valid proof for this - only words. And at least when it comes to Jesus, it is wrong. The teachings of Jesus and the ones of Muhammad are fundamentally too different. Of course Muslims say that the Bible is falsified and that scriptures have disappeared – that is the only way out they have. But they have yet to prove the first and to prove that scriptures documenting all the points Islam says are wrong in other religions have disappeared and none reliable and impossible to misunderstand ones have reappeared among the 13ooo with relevance that exists. “Strong claims need strong proofs.” This even more so as science by means of all the old scriptures has proved that the Bible is not falsified – a fact that is extra clear for NT.

*011 42/13c: “The same religion (Islam*) - - - that We (Allah*) have sent by inspiration to thee (Muhammad*) - - -”. Is it really an omniscient god who has initiated a religion based on a book with at may be 3ooo cases of mistakes, invalid logic, invalid arguments, invalid "signs" and "proofs", plus lots of contradictions, etc.? Definitely no. See 40/75 and 41/12 above and many others.

012 42/15: “I (Muhammad*) believe in the Book (the Quran*) that Allah has sent down - - -.” No omniscient god has sent down a book with that many mistakes, etc., not to mention revered it in his own home as “the Mother Book”.

013 42/17a: “It is Allah Who has sent down the Book (the Quran*) - - -.” See 40/75 and 42/15 above.

014 42/17b: “It is Allah Who has sent down the Book (the Quran*) in Truth - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12 above - and others.

015 42/18: “- - - and know it (the Quran*) is the Truth.” See 04/75 and 41/12 - and others.

016 42/23: “No reward do I (Muhammad*) ask of you (Muslims/people*) - - -“. - - - except total dictatorship over you, total obedience from you, plenty of women, cheap warriors, plenty of riches for bribes, etc., etc.”

017 42/24a: “- - - the Truth (the teachings in the Quran*) - - -.” With that many mistakes and worse, the teachings in the Quran at best is partly true.

***018 42/24b: “And Allah - - - proves the Truth by His Words.” Muhammad was asked many times to prove his - or presumably Allah’s - words, but he never did, and seemed never to be able to, this even more so, as f. ex. some of his “explanations” for why he never could prove anything, an intelligent man like him knew were lies (f. ed. that real miracles would make no-one believe anyhow). And the words of the Quran prove not a thing, among other reasons because:

1. Far too many mistakes pretending to be facts. (Swindle?)
2. Far too many loose statements pretending to be facts. (Swindle?)
3. Far too many invalid “signs” pretending to be documentation. (Swindle?)
4. Far too many invalid or even wrong "proofs" pretending to be documentation. (Swindle?)
5. Some obvious lies – f. ex. that miracles would make no-one believe. (Swindle.)
6. Muhammad was unable to present anything but fast-talk when asked for proofs. (Swindle?)
7. Lots of invalid use of logic. (Swindle?)
8. Lots of contradictions (– proves of lies?)

These all are hallmarks of a crook and a cheat and a deceiver.

019 42/29a: “- - - His (Allah’s*) Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.

020 42/29b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*021 42/30a: “Whatever misfortune happens to you, is because of things your hands have wrought - - -”. Wrong. Sometimes it is because of bad luck and coincidence and sometimes f. ex. by what others do. F. ex. if some terrorists - normally Muslims - kills or mutilates you for things you absolutely are not guilty of. And not least it may be because of natural catastrophes – like the 2004 tsunami that killed more than 300ooo, mostly Muslims (ca. 80%).

*022 42/30b: “Whatever misfortune happens to you, is because of things your hands have wrought - - -”. Wrong. According to the Quran, Allah desides everything (though Islam is unable to explain how this corresponds to the claimed free will of man - and lamely claims that all the same it must be true, "because Allah says so in the Quran"(!!!)).

023 42/32a: “- - - His (Allah’s*) Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.

*00a 42/32b: “And among his Signs are the ships, smooth-running through the ocean - - -”. Neither Allah nor Muhammad ever built a ship - and if Islam says that Allah thought man to build ships, they will have to prove it. The same if what the point here is that the wind moves the ships. The Quran never has proved that Allah makes the wind - a Hindu or Pagan priest may utter the same invalid words, that his god(s) make(s) it. Words are that cheap.

024 42/33: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

025 42/35: “- - - Our (Allah’s*) Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.

026 42/49: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

027 42/50: “- - - He (Allah*) is full of knowledge - - - “. Hardly. See 40/75 and 41/12.

028 42/52a: “- - - We (Allah*) have made the (Quran) a Light - - -”. A book with may be 3ooo mistakes, contradictions, invalid statements, “signs”, “proofs”, invalid logic, etc. is not much of a light. See also 40/75 + 41/12.

029 42/52b: “- - - and verily thou (Muhammad*) dost guide (men) to the Straight Way - - -“. It is not possible to guide anyone straight from a book this crooked.

030 42/53: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.

Surah 42: At least 30 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.

SURAH 43:

001 43/2: “- - - the Book that makes things clear - - -”. A book with 2000+ mistakes makes few things clear. See also 40/75 + 41/12.

002 43/3: “- - - (and learn Wisdom) - - -.” Nobody learns wisdom from a book full of errors.

***003 43/4a: “- - - it (the Quran*) is in the Mother of Books, in Our (Allah’s*) presence, high (in dignity) - - -”. This is one of the places in the Quean where Muhammad claims the Quran is taken from (is a copy of) the Mother Book in Allah’s own home/Heaven. But no book containing hundreds of mistakes, hundreds of contradictions, hundreds of loose claims and statements, lots of invalid logic, lots of invalid “signs” and lots of invalid “proofs” easy for anybody with good and wide education too see through, etc., is copied from a revered Mother Book, high in dignity and esteem, in the perfect Heaven, the home of a perfect, omnipotent and omniscient god. See also 13/39.

004 43/4a: “- - - (a Quran*) full of Wisdom - - -.” See 40/75 and 41/12.

**005 43/6: “But how many were the prophets We (Allah*) sent amongst the people of the old?” Well, Hadith says 124ooo - and it is not true, because so many had had to leave some traces.

Besides: With so many different people so many different places in the world - why were there no other prophet any place in the world at the time of Muhammad - yes, none at all for a very long time before Muhammad? According to the time scale of Genesis and the Torah and the Bible that the Quran does not correct, and 124ooo prophets, it should mean hundreds or a few thousands for each generation.

And: Islam’s explanation for why Allah wanted new holy books on Earth now and then, is that the world changes, and then some details in the holy book needs adjusting. Why then is Muhammad said to be the last one? – and the Quran to be the last book, a book that is too inhuman, too primitive on justice, and too outdated on warfare (too destructive) for modern societies, just to mention 3 subjects. The world has changed MUCH more between Muhammad and now, than between Adam and Muhammad, and man needs new instruction for a less inhuman world - and an omniscient god had known that on beforehand.

*006 43/9a: “- - - ‘Who created the heavens (plural and wrong*)?’ they (non-Muslims*) would be sure to reply, ‘They were created by (Allah*)”. Wrong - if they believed a god had created it, they would be sure to mention their own god, though in the old Arabia that may have been the polytheistic god al-Lah, which could cause (intended?) confusion because the names were so similar (the same reason why Islam now tends to use the word “God” instead of “Allah” in the west, we have been told – it hides some of the real differences.)

007 43/9b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

008 43/9c: “(Allah is*) full of Knowledge - - -”. See 41/12 and 40/75.

*009 43/10a: “(Allah*) has made for you the earth (like a carpet), spread out - - -”. The Quran many places says the Earth is flat (it always is compared to something flat) - perhaps round like a disk, but flat - - - like a carpet. Wrong.

*010 43/10b: “- - - and (Allah*) has made for you roads - - -”. We have never heard about a road made by a god, except perhaps in fairy tales. The paths/roads in Arabia were so old that no one remembered the start of them, and then Muhammad could tell things like this.

011 43/11a: “- - - We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead - - -”. A land that is coming alive only because of rain is not dead - it is alive with seeds and perhaps roots.

012 43/11b: “- - - We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead - - -.” Wrong. If water is all it takes, the land only looks dead – it is alive with seeds and roots. Any god knows.

*013 43/11c: “- - - We (Allah*) rise to life therewith (with rain*) a land that is dead; even so will ye be raised (from the dead) - - -”. The comparison is wrong - and a god had known it. In the first case the DNA is alive and well and ready to sprout. In a dead body everything is finished - also the DNA and all its possibility to go against entropy (a term from physics that can be said to be a measure for chaos and lower states of energy). There is critical difference in that.

*014 43/12: “- - - (Allah*) created pairs in all things - - -”. Very wrong. This only goes for multi-cellular beings, and for far from all of them. And it goes not at all for uni-cellular beings - and they exist in a by far larger number, both in quantity and species. Any god knew this - Muhammad not.

015 43/14: “And to our Lord (Allah*), surely, must we turn back.” With 2ooo+ mistakes etc. in the Quran, this may be wrong, too - see 41/10 and 41/12. For sure it is not sure that we meet Allah - if any god at all - after this life.

016 43/29a: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. See 40/75 and 42/12.

017 43/29b: “- - - a Messenger (Muhammad*) making things clear.” No messenger preaching what is in the Quran, makes things clear – too many mistakes and too much unclear logic, etc.

018 43/30: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. See 40/75 and 42/12.

00a 43/43a: “- - - the Revelation - - -.” Is it a revelation? And in case from whom? – not from an omniscient god (too many mistakes) and neither from a good god (too inhuman, too dishonest, too bloody). But perhaps from a dark power in disguise? – or from humans? – or even from himself?

019 43/43b: “- - - the Revelation sent down to thee (Muhammad*) - - -.” The claimed revelation at least is not sent down by any omniscient god like the Quran wants one to believe – if at all sent down.

020 43/44: “The (Quran) is indeed the message, for thee and for the people - - -.” Definitely not – too much is wrong. Or if it after all is a message – from whom?

00b 43/45: “And question thou Our (Allah’s*) messengers whom We sent before thee (Muhammad*); did We appoint any deity other than (Allah) Most Gracious, to be worshipped?” Allah or Yahweh for the Biblical ones? (In spite of what the Quran says, it is not the same god unless the god is schizophrenic – the teachings are fundamentally too different. Islam tries to explain away – without documentation like normal for Islam – the differences with claims that the Bible is falsified, but science has long since shown that it is not true. There may be a limited number of mistakes in that book, too – though much less than in the Quran - but no falsifications.

021 43/46: “- - - the Worlds - - -“. Once more the 7 non-existing Earths that the Quran tells about. See 65/12.

022 43/55: “- - - We (Allah*) drowned them all (= Pharaoh Ramses II and his people*).” At least Ramses himself did not drown. He did not die from drowning, and he did not die until several years later.

**023 43/56: “And We (Allah*) made them a people of the past - - -”. Wrong. Neither Ramses II nor the people of Egypt became a people of the past in the year 1235 BC (the approximate year of the possible exodus, according to science). That did not happen until much later – and the final doom came in 659 AD when the Arabs under Mu’awiya conquered the country and took over - for ever (?). Muslims like to “explain” that “a people” means the soldiers of Pharaoh. But the expression “a people” has a wider meaning than that.

**00c 43/59: “He (Jesus*) was no more than a servant - - -”. Possible. But there is still the funny fact that thousands heard him call Yahweh “father”. Whereas only one man - and a man of very questionable character and ethics, claims the opposite - and this even a man who had much to gain from Jesus being not the son of God. And he claimed it as much as 600 years later without any kind of documentation.

**024 43/63a: “(Jesus said*): therefore fear Allah - - -”. If Jesus had been a missionary for a known polytheistic god from a not too far of country, he for one thing had got very few followers in the at that time strictly monotheistic Israel, and for another thing he had been killed by the clergy long before - especially if he all the same got a big following like he really did. This is a tale told by someone who knew the religious and political situation in Israel around year 30 AD badly.

025 43/63b: “(Jesus said*): fear Allah and obey me - - -.” This is really is Muhammad’s slogan – he wanted power, and religion/Allah was his Platform of Power. And many places in the Quran it becomes clear that Muhammad wants everyone to believe he was a “normal” (but top) prophet (actually he was no real prophet, as he did not have the gift of making prophesies – see chapter about Muhammad), and then it was nice if Jesus used the same words like Muhammad and showed this was normal for prophets to say. But one of the really – and one of many - fundamental differences between Jesus and Muhammad (and for that case between f. ex. Buddha and Muhammad), was that Jesus was absolutely not interested in power on this Earth. Consequently this slogan that Muhammad very frequently used in different varieties to secure his power, was meaningless for Jesus. (The Quran does not oppose what can be taken as a fact: That Jesus preached, but did not seek power on Earth.)

026 43/64: “(Jesus said): For Allah, He is my Lord and your Lord - - -”. See 43/63 just above. We may add that starters of new religions or sects often try to “high-jack” well known persons or situations to use it in their teachings. This may look like such a case.

027 43/69: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

028 43/78a: “Verily, We (Allah*) have brought - - - (the Quran*) - - -”. Is it really an omniscient god that has produced it? See 40/75 and 41/12

029 43/78b: “Verily, We (Allah*) have brought the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. At most the Quran is partly the truth. See 40/75 and 41/12.

030 43/78c: “- - - but most of you (non-Muslims*) have a hatred to the Truth.” The truth - see 40/75 and 41/12. And in addition:

1. *Few hate – but many are frightened.
2. Quite a number feel distasted because of the inhuman and unjust laws and traditions in Islam.
3. **There is a difference between frightened strength and frightened weakness – a fact that sometimes is forgotten.

*00d 43/81: “If (Allah) Most Gracious had a son, I (Muhammad*) would be the first to worship”. Some proof!! But for that: There still is Jesus calling Yahweh father. And any neutral professor of history would say that according to all normal rules, the Bible should be more reliable than the Quran as a source of correct history: Very much closer in time to Jesus, thousands of witnesses, many narrators, versus one single narrator without good sources and 600 years later - and even a man of dubious character and with strong motif to reduce Jesus to become the greatest prophet himself - and a man clearly lusting for power (just read the Quran and the Hadits - it is easy to see f. ex. his gluing himself to the god.). A man that definitely had not been accepted as a reliable witness in any country with a reliable judicial system. (The real and historic Muhammad was something quite different from the glossy semi-saint Islam and Muslims claims – a claim made necessary because all Islam only is built on this man’s words - if he lies, the religion is a false one). Also: Science has shown that the never dicumenter Islamic claim about falsification of the Bible is wrong.

031 43/82: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

032 43/84: “- - - He (Allah*) is full of Wisdom and Knowledge”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

033 43/85: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

034 43/86: “- - - only he (the not capital “h” must be a misprinting - it refers to Allah*) who bears witness to the Truth - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

035 43/87a: “If thou (Muhammad or Muslims*) ask them, Who created them, they will certainly say, Allah - - -”. Wrong. See f. ex. 43/9 - and many others.

036 43/87b: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) - - -.” The Quran at best is only partly true – too much is wrong.

Surah 43: At least 36 mistakes + 4 likely mistakes.

SURAH 44:

*001 44/2: “- - - the Book (the Quran*) that makes things clear - - -”. A book with this many mistakes and dubious arguments - see 40/75 and 41/12 - dictated by a man with a dubious character - see f. ex. 31/30 - does not make things clear.

002 44/4: “In that (night) (when the first surah is said to be sent down*) is made distinct every affair of wisdom”. As for wisdom in the Quran - see 40/75 and 41/12.

003 44/6: “He (Allah*) hears and knows (all things) - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

004 44/7: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

005 44/25-28: “Thus (was their (pharaoh Ramses II and his men*) end - - -”. We know from other parts of the Quran that the end was drowning. Wrong, at least for Ramses II himself - he did not die by drowning (if he had done, you bet three religions had screamed about it!), and he only died years later than the possible exodus in ca. 1235 BC according to science.

006 44/33: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

007 44/38: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

Surah 44: At least 7 mistakes.

SURAH 45:

00a 45/2a: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) - - -.” There never were any proofs for anything. So many things are wrong with the Quran, that it has to be proved it really was revealed.

001 45/2b: “The revelation of the Book (the Quran*) is from Allah - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

002 45/2c: “(Allah is) Full of Wisdom.” See 40/75.

003 45/3a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

004 45/3b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

005 45/4: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

**006 45/5a: “And the alternation of the Night and Day - - - are Signs for those who are wise”. Not unless Islam proves it is Allah who alternates night and day. They may say that Allah made the physical laws - but then they will have to prove it - - - “strong claims demands strong proofs”. And of course they will have to compete with all other religions trying to say and do the same, with the same cheap words. Words are cheap as long as you do not have to prove them - and very little in the Quran is proved.

***In Islam the educated ones know nothing is proved. The defence is that “any intelligent person can see from the texts in the Quran that they have to be sent down by an omniscient god” (!!). All the mistakes and all the invalid “proofs” etc. disapprove this. The second line of defence is that it is “primitive” thinking to have to rely on proofs!!! (F. ex. in “The Message of the Quran” that on top of all is “certified” by a top university - Al-Azhar in Cairo). The reality is the 180-degree opposite: It is primitive - and naïve - thinking to accept loose claims and often obviously wrong and unlikely statements without some sorts of proofs.

007 45/5b: “- - - the fact that Allah sends down Sustenance from the sky - - -.” As “always” the Quran makes a claim only, and proves nothing. As long as it is not proved, it is not a fact – words are too cheap. Actually this is one of the very many cases where the Quran takes a natural a phenomenon – here rain – and unceremoniously say it is Allah that makes it - - - just like any priest in any religion can say about his god or gods, just as cheaply.

008 45/5c: “(Allah*) revives thereafter the earth after its death (by sending rain*) - - -”. One thing is that the Quran in no way proves that it is Allah who sends the rain - the book has a strong tendency to give Allah credit without any documentation for natural occurrences. But: If earth comes alive just because of water, it was not dead - it only looked like that.

009 45/5d: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

**010 45/6a: “Such are the Signs of Allah, which we (Allah*) rehearse to thee (Muhammad*) in truth - - -”. A strange saying, as all “Signs” in the Quran are logically invalid, as they either are claims or statements based on nothing or based on other invalid (not proved) claims, statements, “proofs”, etc. There may be a few exceptions for some taken from the Bible, but they in case indicate Yahweh.

011 45/6b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

012 45/8: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

013 45/9: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

014 45/11a: “This (the Quran*) is (true) Guidance - - -”. A book with perhaps 3ooo mistakes, invalid statements, contradictions, etc., etc., is no true guidance. See 40/75 and 41/12.

015 45/11b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

016 45/13a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

017 45/13b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

018 45/17: “- - - Clear Signs - - -.” See 2/99.

00b 45/18: “Then We (Allah*) put thee on the (right) way of Religion - - -”. All the mistakes, contradictions, invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs” gives reason for serious doubts about that.

**019 45/19+20: “- - - Allah is the Protector of the Righteous. These are clear evidence to men - - -”. Yes, but only if it is documented that Allah really is a protector. There are no proofs for that in the Quran - only claims or statements based on invalid (not proved) claims or loose statements, etc. There in reality is not even a single valid proof for Allah himself. (But then it is not possible for humans to prove a god - only a god can do that. That is one of the reasons why all the “proofs” in the Quran turn out invalid – Allah refused to or was unable to prove anything).

020 45/20: “These are clear evidence to men and a Guidance - - - to (the believers*).” See 45/19+20 just above - how can an invalid “proof” be guidance? After all a proof is one or more proven fact(s) that can give only one conclusion whereas Islam/Muhammad/the Quran far too often use unproven claims or statement only as basis for new claims, instead of proven facts – and then any conclusion is invalid.

021 45/22: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.

022 45/25: “- - - Clear Signs - - -.” There are no clear signs of Allah – or of Muhammad’s connection to a god – in all the Quran. See 2/22.

023 45/26: “- - - the Day of Judgement, about which there is no doubt - - -”. Because of all the mistakes, etc., in the Quran, there is every reason for doubt, and especially about a Muslim style Day of Judgement.

024 45/27: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

025 45/32: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

026 45/32: “- - - there was no doubt about its (the Judgement Day*) (coming) - - -”. See 45/26 above.

027 45/35: “- - - Signs of Allah - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.

028 45/36a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

029 45/36b: “- - - the Worlds - - -“. The trouble for the Quran is that the 7 Earths this refers to, do not exist. See 65/12.

030 45/37a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

031 45/37b: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

Surah 45: At least 31 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 46:

00a 46/2a: “The Revelation of the Book (the Quran*) - - -.” Back to square one – is the Quran revealed? – and in case from whom? See 41/12.

001 46/2b: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom.” Not if the Quran is representative for it – too many mistakes, etc. See 40/5 and 41/12.

002 46/3: “- - - heaven - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

003 46/4a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

004 46/4b: “Bring me (Muhammad*) a Book (revealed) before this (as a proof*) - - -“. Wrong. A book in itself proves nothing – it is as easy to falsify a book as it is to falsify speech. F. ex. the Quran can well be a falsification – made by Muhammad or someone.

005 46/7a: “- - - Our (Allah’s) Clear Signs - - .” There are no clear signs from Allah in all the Quran – see 2/99.

006 46/7b: “- - - the Unbelievers say of the Truth (the Quran*) - - -.” See 2/99 and 40/75 above.

**007 46/9: “I (Muhammad) am no bringer of a newfangled doctrine - - -”. Muhammad pretended Islam was the continuation of - or the uncorrupted - religion of the Jews and the Christians. That is not true - especially in the NT it is clear that the teachings fundamentally are so different (and sciens has prowed that Islam's undocumented claims about falsification of the Bible are wrong), that it can not be the same god - at least if he is not mentally ill. See 29/46 and 12/111.

***008 46/10: “If (this teaching) be from Allah, and ye (non-Muslims) reject it, and a witness from among the Children of Israel testifies to its similarity (with earlier scriptures (what is Muhammad’s definition of “similarity” here?*)), and has believed (or pretended to believe - sometimes that was necessary*) while ye are arrogant, (how unjust ye are) - - -”. This sentence is a bit complicated, but what Muhammad said, was that a Jew agreed – true or not true - to that the Quran was similar to old Jewish scriptures, and that non-Muslims then are unjust not accepting that Muhammad is a real prophet.

1. Tales like this are quite common among self proclaimed prophets trying to prove their new religion or sect. They may be true or not true.
2. We only have Muhammad’s word for this - a man who had initiated or himself done a lot of dubious deeds included lying/betrayal, and on top of that had a lot to gain from making people believe him, a man who lusted for power - and one who was teaching a dubious tale. There are no other sources. The tale may be true or not true.
3. We do not know how many Jews lived in the neighbourhood of Mecca/Medina. But in only one tribe he destroyed, there were 700 men (all murdered – in Khaybar. Plus the 29 from the peace delegation he invited and murdered earlier). As families tended to be large, that should mean some 2ooo-3ooo women and children in addition (all made slaves). And there were three big tribes (and some small ones) and thus thousands of Jews - and the women at least here cannot be omitted, as they tend to be more religious than men. It would be most surprising if not one or a few of them wanted to humour the power-that-be or really changed the religion - from belief or greed or fright or other reasons.
4. But all the other – thousands and thousands - of Jews said Muhammad was wrong. This even when he marched against them with his army, and they knew to humour him meant “no war”. Even when they had to give him all their farms and become day workers for him - still knowing that humouring him meant they would keep their possessions if they in time had humoured him. Even those who had to flee, loosing everything they could not carry - knowing that if they humoured him, they could stay. Not to mention the 700 men of Khaybar - knowing they were murdered by the half-dozens through the day and far into the night, and that humouring him perhaps could save their lives. All said no; Muhammad was too wrong to be possible to accept even then.
5. Even if it was correct that one or a few Jew said yes - which well may be true: “One swallow makes no summer”. (It also may be a made up story - that often happens in new sects to "prove" they are right.)

All in all: This “proof” has no value. According to the Jews Muhammad was very wrong. And even more: We still have the same books of Moses - the Torah is unabrigded for at least 1000 years before Muhammad according to science – and the rest of the Jewish Bible (the OT) that the Jews in Arabia had. Anyone can read and see they were right.

009 46/12a: “- - - this Book (the Quran) confirms (it (the Torah*)) - - -”. See 46/10 just above, and especially the last lines. No one knew or know the Torah better than the Jews. Wrong.

010 46/12b: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for for the ones not suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen riches, and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid that got – and get – a lot of power in addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the minor percentage of people that need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan religion was not strong enough.

011 46/16: “- - - a promise of truth (the words of the Quran concerning Paradise*) - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12 - the promise of Paradise is part of it.

00b 46/17: “For the promise of Allah is true.” That may be - if he exists (there is not one single proof, and the number of tries with invalid proofs, etc., make no good impression, as that normally is the hallmarks of cheats and deceivers). But there are good reasons for doubt, as the only source for information is the Quran, and very much there is not correct - or doubtful.

012 46/27: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

013 46/30a: “We (some Jinns*) have heard a Book (the Quran*) revealed after Moses, confirming what came before it - - -”. Jinns were beings “borrowed” from Arab fairy tales, legends and from the old Arab pagan religion – Muhammad mostly based his world on the (contorted) biblical legends - - - and on Arab traditions (the rest of the world made little or no traces in Allah’s religion – nothing from the Americas or Australia f. ex. But may be the uneducated, warlike Arabs had done things almost correct in most of the religious aspects in their pagan religion? – only the Arabs of the ones without a Book?).

014 46/30b: "- - - confirming what (Torah,Bible*) came before it (the Quran*) - - -". As for confirming the Torah and also the Bible: See 40/75 and 46/10.

015 46/30c: “- - - it (the Quran*) guides (men) - - -”. A book with that many mistakes and invalid “proofs” etc. is no reliable guide.

016 46/30c: “- - - it (the Quran*) guides men to the Truth - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

017 46/33: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

011 46/34a: “Is this not the Truth? (= what was told in the Quran*)”. With all its mistakes etc. the Quran at best is partly true.

019 46/34b: “- - - ye were wont to deny (truth (the Quran*))!” See 46/34a just above.

Surah 46: At least 19 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 47:

00a 47/2a: “- - - believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad - - -”. Was it really sent down? See 42/12.

001 47/2b: “- - - for it (the Quran*) is the Truth - - -”. See 40/75.

002 47/2c: “- - - for it (the Quran*) is the Truth from their (Muslims‘*) Lord (Allah*) - - -.” Is it? No. See 40/75 and 41/12.

003 47/3a: “- - - those who believe follow the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. Do they? See 40/75.

004 47/3b: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) from their Lord (Allah*) - - -”. Is it? Not if Allah is omniscient - too much is wrong in the book. See 41/12 + 40/75.

****005 47/4: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them) - - -.” BUT OUR SOURCES TELL THAT THE WORDS “(in fight)” IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE ARAB TEXT – IT IS ADDED BY THE TRANSLATOR. Muslims primarily shall read the Quran in Arab, and there in case the text is: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers, smite at their necks - - -“. It in case simply is a permanent order to be aggressive.

The real religion of peace.

006 47/9: “- - - the Revelation (the Quran*) of Allah - - -.” It is highly questionable if the Quran is a real revelation. What is not questionable is that it in no case came from an omniscient god (too much is wrong), and from no good god (too inhuman, too unfair, too harsh, too hateful, too bloody.)

007 47/10: “Do they (non-Muslims*) not travel through the earth, and see what was the End of those before them (who did evil)?” In the Middle East there are scattered ruins – houses, villages, towns. Muhammad claimed – as normal without any proof – that they all were results of Allah’s punishment for disbelief and sins. But in an arid and harsh country which on top of all was settled by warlike inhabitants, there were many other reasons for empty houses. The statement that all were empty because of punishment for disbelief and other sins against Allah need strong proofs from Islam to be believed.

008 47/14: “- - - on a clear (Path) from his (a person*) Lord (Allah*) (= living according to the Quran) - - -“. The trouble is that so crooked, and of so doubtful clarity, as the Quran is, it does not represent a clear path.

*009 47/16: “- - - those (Muslims*) who have received Knowledge (the Quran*) - - -”. The Quran at best represents bits and pieces of knowledge, and it is difficult for uneducated people to know what is true and what not. See 40/75 and 41/12 and others.

00b 47/27: “But how (will it be) when the angles take their souls at death - - -.” Is something wrong here? In 32/11 there is a special angel – the Angel of Death – doing this, and in 39/42 it is Allah.

*010 47/32: “- - - after Guidance (the Quran*) has been clearly shown to them (non-Muslims*) - - -”. There is not much guidance in a book with that much mistakes and cheating (trying to use invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”). See 40/75. If there is some, it in no way is “clear”.

Surah 47: At least 10 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 48:

001 48/4: “- - - Allah is Full of Wisdom - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

002 48/7: “- - - (Allah is*) Full of Wisdom - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

003 48/8a: “We (Allah*) have truly sent thee (Muhammad*) as a witness - - -”. Is this reliable? - in a book with this much mistakes, invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”? There is only one possible answer to that: A “witness” bringing so much wrong information and wrong fact, is not sent from an omniscient god. And one may add: A “witness” bringing so much injustice, hate and misery to the world, is not sent by a good and benevolent god. If Muhammad at all was sent, on may speculate about by whom. Personally we hardly believe he was sent by even a devil, though the religion as preached in the Quran fits any devil well. But not even a devil would make a "holy" book with so many mistakes and errors – he would be found out sooner or later.

***But may be a devil knew that mistakes so not matter very much – may be he knew that religiously blind persons are unable to see even the most obvious mistaken facts, because they do not want to see them?

004 48/8b: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for the ones not suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen riches, and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid that got – and get – a lot of power in addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings for the minor percentage of people that need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan religion was not strong enough.

005 48/19: “- - - Allah is - - - Full of Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12 and others.

006 48/20: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

007 48/26: “And Allah has full knowledge of all things”. The Quran proves the opposite (see 40/75) - - - if not the Quran is a falsification.

008 48/28: “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad*) with Guidance - - -”. There is not much guidance in a teaching based on a book with that many mistakes and littered with hallmarks of a cheat and deceiver (loose statements and invalid “signs” and “proofs”).

009 48/28: “- - - Guidance and the Religion of Truth, to proclaim it over all religion - - -”. At most partly the truth. See 40/75. The second part of the sentence tells volumes about Islam.

00a 48/29: “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” There are so many mistakes and so many places tried cheating and deceiving in the Quran - is this any more reliable? - especially as it is said by the man himself, a man who was unreliable and who clearly liked power?

Surah 48: At least 9 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.

SURAH 49:

001 49/1: “- - - Allah - - - knows all things.” Not if he composed the Quran. See 40/75.

002 49/8: “- - - Allah is full of Knowledge and Wisdom”. See 40/75.

003 49/13a: “- - - We (Allah*) created you (man*) from a single (pair) of male and female - - -”. Adam and Eve never were, according to science. Besides if everything had started with just one pair, the DNA-variety had been too small to make the group viable in the long run = man had died out after some generations. (Actually science says that to have enough DNA variety + have a reasonable safety margin against dangerous illnesses, a group of animals (ot humans) should consist of minimum some 2000 members – and spread around some to reduce the impact of contagious illnesses – to be sure to be viable in the long run.)

004 49/13b: “And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things).” Not if he has and respects the “Mother Book” (see f. ex. 43/4) like the Quran revered in his heaven, and not if he sent down a copy of a book with that much wrong contents as a basis for his religion. See 40/75 and 41/12. Also see 4/176 – 27/6 – 27/44 – 48/26 – 49/1 – 49/16 – 49/18 – 57/3 – 64/4 – 65/12 – 67/13.

**Besides: Have you ever noticed that the one who needs to boast – loudly and frequently – about how truthful he is, is the cheater, and the one boasting about his knowledge is the mediocre to rather, but not top, intelligent ones? – the really honest and the really intelligent persons never need to boast about those things. Real honesty and real intelligence makes itself felt after some time of close connection – if there is a need for boasting, something is wrong.

005 49/16a: “But Allah knows all that is in heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth - - -”. Not if he reveres a “mother book” (43/4) like the Quran in his heaven. See 40/75 and 41/12.

006 49/16b: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

007 49/18: “Verily Allah knows the secrets of the heavens (plural and wrong - some proofs or statements the Quran chooses) and the earth - - -”. Not if he reveres a “Mother Book” (43/4) he has copied the Quran from, in his heaven”. See 40/75, 41/12 and 49/16a above.

Surah 49: At least 7 mistakes.

SURAH 50:

001 50/1a: “- - - by the Glorious Quran - - -”. A book with that many mistakes, contradictions, etc., and with so many hallmarks of cheating and deceiving (loose statements, invalid “signs” and “proofs”, etc.) is not glorious. By the way the expression is an oath - swearing by the Quran. Hope the rest is true, if not it is a false swearing. Though in Islam in some cases false oaths are permitted - or can be forgiven if paid for).

00a 50/1b: “- - - by the Glorious Quran (thou (Muhammad*)) art Allah’s Messenger”. See 49/29.

00b 50/3: “What! When we die and become dust (shall we live again?)”. Muhammad thought that at the Day of Doom all humans would be revived in flesh and bodily and not least mentally to be just the same humans that they were here on Earth except rejuvenated – Allah would assemble all the bones, dust, fluids and gas molecules you ones consisted of, and recreate your (former) body and soul from it (though in the shape of a young and good-looking individual – but as the Quran talks little about your children in Paradise, it is unclear if babies and children that died were/are recreated as adults or not. It also is unclear if they will be self-sufficient in Paradise, or only members of your family) Believe it who wants to.

002 50/5: “But they (non-Muslims*) deny the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. See f. ex. 40/75 and 41/12.

**003 50/6: “- - - and there are no flaws in it (the sky*) - - -”. The sky is two different optical illusions - by day one made by bending of sunlight, and by night by our inability to see the 3 dimensions at long distances:

1. As the sunlight by day hits the entire atmosphere and bends light all over, flaws are difficult to see by the naked eye. (There really are no flaws, but shimmering because of temperature differences is easy to see when you use a telescope – and by night sometimes the flickering of stars). Once more a natural occurrence the Quran says is because of Allah, without any proof. Another loose statement.
2. At night we see deep into the vacuum of space. There are no visible flaws in vacuum. Once more: A loose statement without real value - except for cheaters and deceivers.

Any priest in any religion can say just the same about his god(s). Words are that cheap.

Besides: How can there be flaws in optical illusions? And physically speaking: How can there be visible flaws in vacuum?

004 50/7: “And the earth - we (Allah*) have spread it out - - -”. The Quran tells the earth is flat - may be like a disk, but flat. Wrong.

005 50/11: “- - - and We (Allah*) give (new) life therewith (with water*) to land that is dead - - -”. Land that comes alive just with water is not dead - it is alive with seeds and perhaps roots.

006 50/13: “- - - the bretheren of Lut (Lot*) - - -.” This refers to the people of Sodom and Gomorrah, but it is extremely clear that they were not his “bretheren”. For one thing he was a stranger from very far away, and for another it is very clear from both the Bible and from the Quran that he was at odds with them – the connection was nowhere like a naturalized “brother”. Simply wrong.

The only reason we can see for the use of this word, is that Muhammad wanted the situation to fit into his statement that prophets were sent to their own people – “their own brethren”. Wrong – and forgetting also about f. ex Jonah.

007 50/19: “- - - Truth (like in the Quran*) - - -”. See 49/75.

008 50/37a: “Verily in this is a Message (the Quran*) - - - .” There simply is no message in it – not from Allah - until Islam really proves that Allah really said and did all that this refers to.

009 50/37b: “Verily in this is a Message (the Quran*) - - - (that is*) (the truth) - - -.” See 40/75. There simply is no message in it, until Islam really proves that Allah really did all that.

*010 50/38a: “We (Allah*) created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth and all between them in Six Days”. Flatly wrong – it took some billions of years.

011 50/38b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

00c 50/38c: “- - - nor did any sense of weariness (from creating everything in 6 days*) touch Us (Allah*).” Why then has the week 7 days (the Bible tells the god rested the 7. day)?

Surah 50: At least 11 mistakes + 3 likely mistakes.

SURAH 51:

001 51/5: “(The Quran swears in 51/1 to 51/4 that) Verily what ye (Muslims*) are promised (in the Quran*) is true - - -“. With so many mistakes, etc. – and even obvious lies – in that book, also this hardly is true. It at least will need solid proofs.

002 51/8: “Truly you (people/non-Muslims*) are in a doctrine discordant”. Some may be yes, some may no. Among the ones in “may be yes” are the Muslims, as all the mistakes and worse in the Quran prove absolutely that something is wrong with that book and that religion.

003 51/9: “Through which (non-Muslims*) are deluded (away from the Truth)”. As for truth, see 40/75.

004 51/20: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

***005 51/23: “- - - by the Lord (Allah*) of heaven and earth (the Quran/Allah is swearing by Allah!!*), this (the promise of Paradise*) is the very truth - - -”. We have to hope so, as a false oat is not good in Islam either - but one can pay compensation, and if it was said thoughtlessly it may even be forgiven without (and if it is to defend or forward Islam, it is an obligation to do so if necessary). But for truths in the Quran see 40/75, 41/12 and others. (Sentences in the Quran that starts with “by” normally are oaths.)

006 51/30: “- - - He (Allah*) is full of Wisdom and Knowledge.” See 40/75.

007 51/37: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

008 51/38: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

009 51/40: “So We (Allah*) took him (Pharaoh Ramses II*) and his forces, and threw them into the sea (where they drowned*)”. For one thing they were not thrown into the sea, they went themselves (according to the Bible and not opposed by other places in the Quran) out on the dry sea bed, and then the water returned), but for another: At least Ramses II himself did not die by drowning and he also did not die until some years later, according to science.

010 51/41: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

011 51/43: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

**00a 51/47: “- - - it is We (Allah*) Who created the vastness of space.” Here is a point that should be controlled: According to one of our sources, the word that is used in Arab is “samaa” which is said to mean “sky”, whereas the Arab word for “universe” or “space” is said to be “al-kawn”. We have till now been unable to check this for sure, but mention it because such dishonesty tells so very much if it is true – and we find half truths or cases of al-Taqiyya too often in Islamic media/books (though we had originally not expected it from a man like Yusuf Ali).

012 51/48: “And We (Allah*) have spread out the (spacious) earth - - -”. From other places in the Quran we know the spreading out is like a carpet - and the earth is flat. Wrong.

*013 51/49: “And of every thing We (Allah*) have created pairs - - -”. Very wrong. This only goes for multi-cellular beings, and not even for all of them – among primitive animals and even up to reptiles and fish you find some kinds that propagate asexually, and thus do not make pairs. Uni-cellular beings are not in pairs, and there are by far many more of them both in species and in total numbers. Any god had known – Muhammad not. Who made the Quran?

**014 51/50: “I (Muhammad*) am from Him (Allah*) a warner to you - - -.” Here is one more of those really bad ones: Suddenly the book changes from Allah speaking to Muhammad speaking. But how is it possible for Muhammad to speak in a book that pretends to be billions of years old (from eternity – before the universe was created 13.7 billion years ago) or made by Allah in his heaven?

Surah 51: At least 14 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.

SURAH 52:

001 52/5: “By (Allah is swearing*) the Canopy (heaven*) Raised High - - -”. There is no canopy/material heaven, only optical illusions. What does it mean that Allah swears by something he should know did not exist??

002 52/11: “- - - those who treat (Truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood - - -”. At least it is not the full truth - see 40/75 and 41/12 and others.

003 52/36: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

004 52/44: “Were they (non-Muslims*) to see a piece of the sky falling (on them), they would only say:’ Clouds gathered in heaps!” The sky is an optical illation (or actually two). A piece of an optical illation cannot fall. (It is clear from the text that it is not meant clouds, and it is clear from other places in the Quran that meteorites (shooting stars) are known - it really is a piece of the sky that is meant).

Surah 52: At least 4 mistakes.

SURAH 53:

*001 53/2: “Your Champion (Muhammad*) is neither astray nor being misled.” All the mistakes, etc. proves that he at least was somewhat astray. Though all the hallmarks of a cheat, deceiver and swindler may indicate that may be he was not misled - those last 3 words may be true, as may be he was misleading.

*002 53/3: “Nor does he (Muhammad*) say (aught) of (his own) desire”. It will take strong proofs to prove that surahs like no. 66 or no. 111 are worthy of and belongs in a revered Mother Book in Paradise - that may be has existed since eternity. And also to prove they are worthy a book revered by an omniscient and omnipotent god.

00a 53/5: “- - - one Mighty in Power (Allah*) - - -.” But is Allah mighty in power? – there is not one single proof for that. Lots and lots of words – even big words – but not one single proof.

003 53/6: “(Allah is*) Endued with Wisdom - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

004 53/11a: “The (Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*)) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

1. Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

00b 53/11b: “The (Prophet’s (Muhammad’s*)) (mind and) heart in no way falsified that which he saw.” If the Quran is fundamentally different from the Bible, and the Bible is not falsified according to science – in spite of Islam’s not documented claims - what explanations are then left?

00c 53/18a: “For truly did he (Muhammad*) see - - -“. How truly is it really? – in a book with this many mistakes and from a man with so suspect morality that not even his oaths are holy?

005 53/18b: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

006 53/26: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

007 53/28: “- - - conjecture avails nothing against Truth (the Quran*)”. Actually that is the question concerning the Quran: How much is true and how much is conjecture - and how much is not even that? See 40/75 + 41/12.

008 53/31: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*009 53/45+46: “- - - He (Allah*) did create (man*) in pairs - male and female - From a seed (the semen*) when lodged (in its place (a female womb*)).” Muhammad believed the semen was some sort of a seed that could start to grow when planted in a woman. Wrong - or at best half the story. But Muhammad obviously did not know the other half - the egg cell - as the same story is told several times in the Quran. Actually this was the going zoology at the time of Muhammad - one did not know how conception happened, and did not know the egg cell. A god had known better. Who made the Quran?

*010 53/49: “- - - He (Allah) is the Lord of Sirius (the Mighty Star) - - -”. Sirius it not very mighty, even if it may look like that from Earth. It is a dwarf compared to stars like Betelgeuse, Aldebaran and millions more. And just a firecracker compared to f. ex. the enormously potent Eta Carinae (borderline enormous for exploding, and expected to go supernova in the astronomically near future). Not to mention compared to the real giants.

**011 53/56: “This is a Warner (Muhammad*), of the (series of) Warners of the old”. Muhammad impressed and impressed and impressed on his followers that he was one of a long series – though the greatest of all – of prophets (even though he per definition was no prophet, as he did not have the gift of making prophesies – he just “borrowed” that prestigious title), as that gave him “weight” and prestige. And to belong to the one timeless “right” religion, also gave his teachings weight among the ones that believed it (Science have never found any traces of a religion like Islam anywhere or any time before 610 AD – if they had, you bet Islam had told about it.) But he in case definitely did not belong to the same series as the Jewish prophets, included Jesus – the teachings were too different. AND they made prophesies - real prophesies – which he was unable to.

Surah 53: At least 11 mistakes + 3 likely mistakes.

SURAH 54:

001 54/2: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

002 54/5: “(The Quran is*) Mature wisdom - - -”. Hardly. See 40/75, 41/12 and others.

003 54/6: “Therefore (O Prophet (Muhammad*)!)” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

004 54/11: “So We (Allah*) opened the gates of Heaven (here = the religiously defined Heaven as it f. ex. is written with capital “H”, not a substitute word for the sky or clouds*) with water pouring forth”. But the material heavens that Muhammad believed in, did not exist - and thus could not contain water.

005 54/15: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

***006 54/17: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” See 54/32 below.

007 54/18: “The Ad (people) rejected (truth (the teachings of the Quran*)) - - -.” Those teachings at best only are partly true – too many mistakes, etc.

008 54/19: “For We (Allah*) sent against them (the people of Ad*) a furious wind, on a Day of violent Disaster”. Well something is wrong – and contradicting – as here it is said one day, in 41/16 it is said (several) days and in 69/7 is said 6 nights and 7 days.

***009 54/22: “But We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” See 45/32 below.

010 54/32: “But We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -”. This in a way is very correct – the language is plain and simple mostly, and the Quran itself makes it clear that one is to understand it literally. Also the statement that it is easy to understand, means that it is to be understood like it is written - if not it was not "easy to understand", (though many Muslims claim that verses that are wrong, are allegories – it is an easy way to use to flee from difficult questions)

But it is all the same at least partly wrong – partly because there are so many places where it is difficult to guess which word is really meant. Separate books are needed to explain the Quran - there are many such ones. And if you read any of the good ones, you will find that even today there are many points in the book Islam has not been able to understand, and even many more points they still do not know the exact meaning of - or which one of two or more meanings is the correct one (though Islam tells that all possible meanings are correct ones - they call it "different ways of reading" to hide the facts that the book for one thing is unclear, and for another that there exist many possible varieties). But it is easy too see that Muhammad meant it was easy and not complicated to understand - and an omniscient god had been able to compose a book that was possible to understand and impossible to misunderstand or not understand, just like Muhammad claimed and surely believed and intended. Who composed the Quran?

011 54/40: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -”. See 54/32 just above.

012 54/42: “- - - Our Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

013 54/55: “An Assembly of Truth - - -“. With so much wrong in the book and hence in the religion, this needs solid proof to be believed by us.

Surah 54: At least 13 mistakes.

SURAH 55:

001 55/2: “It is He (Allah*) Who has thought the Quran.” See 40/75, 41/12 and others.

002 55/3: “He (Allah*) has created man”. At least not like told in the Quran - see 6/2. Besides man was not created according to science - he developed from an earlier primate. If Islam says he was created, they will have to prove it.

003 55/10: “It is He (Allah*) who has spread out the earth - - -”. We know from other places in the Quran that the spreading out, was like a carpet - Muhammad believed the Quran was flat. Wrong.

*004 55/14: “He (Allah*) created man from ringing clay like unto pottery”. Wrong - but somewhat funny. See 6/2.

**00a 55/15: “And He (Allah*) created Jinns from fire free of smoke.” Jinns are beings from old Arab folklore, fairy tales and legends relating to the old Arab pagan religion. Is just by co-incidence that these beings in Allah’s world – that according to the Quran are real beings – before only were known to the Pagan Arabs and not to any others, not even the real (?) prophets in the Bible? – and not to any of the other prophets the Quran claims were spread all over the world and to all times? Because no-one but the old Arabs and their neighbours knew about jinns. In a religion for all the world and made by a god for the entire world, they never manifested themselves any other place in the entire world than just in that area. What a lucky coincident that Allah finally choose just an Arab – Muhammad – for a messenger, so that he could tell the rest of the world what part the jinns play in the real religion. But it also is strange that except for things borrowed from the Bible and a little from neighbouring religions, there is nothing about or from the rest of the world in the Quran – and the Quran practically has no stuff from those pasts of the world, even though there have been prophets all over and to all times, according to that book. (Jinn often is translated with spirits (god or bad) - but it is wrong, because the Arab word for spirits is "ruh". Also other words for supernatural beings from other cultures are used for translation, but it is symptomatic that top translators do not translate the word, but use the Arab one - Jinns are a group of beings special to Arab folklore and legends, and even the top translators do not find equivalent beings or names in western languages.)

*000 55/17: “He (Allah*) is the Lord of the two Easts and the two Wests.” This cryptic sentence means the northmost and the southmost points of the sun during a year (the equinoxes) – in east and west. (We mention this because some Muslims try to find ways to use this sentence to prove that the Quran says the Earth is globular.)

00b 55/24: “And His (Allah’s) are the Ships sailing - - -”. We never heard about a god owning ships. It cannot be literally meant. But the Quran says it is to be read literally.

005 55/29: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*00c 55/31: “- - - both ye worlds!” According to “The message of the Quran”, the Arab word that is used here – “thaqalan” (not plural, but dualis of “thaqal”) does not really mean “worlds”, but is normally translated with “humans and invisible beings”, but may also mean “men and women” in other connections.)

006 55/33: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

**00d 55/56: The Muslim Paradise is quit like the Zoroastrian one (Zoroastrians mainly lived in Persia, one of the big trading partners for Arabia. The Arabs knew that religion – hardly as well as the Mosaic or the Christian religions, but at least superficially.) - except that the houries there were named paaris. (Also the Jewish and Christian hell may have got inspiration from the Zoroastrian one.)

Surah 55: At least 6 mistakes + 4 likely mistakes.

SURAH 56:

001 56/51: “- - - and treat (truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood! - -”. See 40/75, 41/12, and others.

002 56/57: “- - - the Truth (the contents of the Quran*) - - -“. But the contents of the Quran at best only is partly true – too much is wrong.

003 56/70: “- - - We (Allah*) could make it (all rain*) salt - - -”. Not without changing both natural and the physical laws. If Islam insists it is true, they will have to prove it - words are cheap.

004 56/80a: “A Revelation (the Quran*) from the Lord of the Worlds (Allah*) - - -”. Can it really be so? See 41/12 - and 40/75. Impossible – no omniscient god would make/deliver a book with so many mistakes – not to mention keep it in his own Heaven as a revered Mother Book (13/39 - 43/4). Can this be a revelation from a god? Or the other way around: Can something producing so many mistakes, contradictions, so much invalid logic be lord of even one world? Also see 2/131 – 26/109 – 26/127 – 26/192.

005 56/80b: “- - - the Worlds.” The Quran says there are 7 (flat) Earths – and the Hadiths place them one above the other and has named them. Wrong. See 65/12.

006 56/81: “Is it (the Quran*) such a Message that ye would hold it in light esteem?” This rhetoric question demands the answer “no”. Wrong. With so much wrong in the book, it is correct to hold it in very light esteem – if in esteem at all, as everything in it needs to be documented to find out what is right and what is wrong in the book.

007 56/92: “- - - those (non-Muslims*) who treat (Truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood - - -”. There really is a question: What is true and what is false in the Quran - see 40/75 and 41/12 and others.

008 56/95: “Verily, this (the description of hell in the Quran*) is the Very Truth and Certainty”. Why should what the Quran says about Hell be more true and certain than the rest of the book? See 40/75 and other places.

Surah 56: At least 8 mistakes.

SURAH 57:

001 57/1a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

002 57/1b: “- - - He (Allah*) is - - - the Wise.” Not according to all the mistakes, etc. in the Quran.

003 57/2: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

004 57/3: “- - - He (Allah*) has full knowledge of all things”. Not if he had anything to do with the Quran - see 40/75 and other places.

*005 57/4: “He (Allah*) it is who created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth in six days - - -”. It is not possible to doubt that Muhammad/the Quran means that it all took 6 days, except one time it took 8 days (contradiction). Wrong. It in reality took billions of years.

006 57/4b: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

007 57/5: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*008 57/6: “He (Allah*) merges Night into Day, and Day into Night - - -”. Wrong. It is the sun and the revolving of the Earth that does this - any god knew it, but Muhammad not. Then who made the Quran? If Islam still say Allah does it - or made the natural laws behind it - they will have to bring proof - - - and not just words or statements any priest can use for any god, as statements and words are very cheap.

009 57/9: “- - - manifest Signs - - -“. There are no manifest – sure – signs in the Quran. See 2/99.

010 57/10: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

011 57/16: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) that has been revealed - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

012 57/17: “- - - Sign(s) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

013 57/19a: “- - - they (Muslims) are sincere (Lovers of Truth (the Quran*)) - - -”. See 40/75 + 41/12.

014 57/19: “- - - Our (Allah’s Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

015 57/25: “- - - clear Signs - - -.” See 2/99.

***016 57/27: “- - - (Allah*) bestowed on him (Jesus*) the Gospel - - -”. For one thing is seems that Muhammad did not know there were 4 Gospels - he always used singular. Worse is that the Gospels were all written after his (Jesus') death. Muslims try to “save the day” by insisting that Allah used another Gospel which is now disappeared - a standard way for Muslims to “explain” difficult points, and as normal without documentation. But in this case they may even be right - there may have existed an older one (the possible original for 3 of the known Gospels). The bad news is that we know that if it ever existed, also that one was written after Jesus was dead, because a Gospel is the story of Jesus’ life and death and resurrection, and it could not be written until after this had happened (and that possible Gospel in case means that there is even shorter time between Jesus and the first written Gospels).Muslims also never mention the other possible explanation for why the 3 are so similar: That the oldest have been model for the two others. (In this case there was no older Gospel they partly copied - and no claimed way out on this point for Muslims.)

Surah 57: At least 16 mistakes.

SURAH 58:

001 58/5: “- - - Clear Signs - - -.” See 2/99.

002 58/7a: “- - - Allah doth know (all) that is in the heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth - - -”. Not if the Quran is a copy of a “mother book” (54/32) he reveres in his Heaven. See 40/75 and 41/12.

003 58/7b: “- - - heavens - - -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

Surah 58: At least 3 mistakes.

SURAH 59:

001 59/1a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/2a.

00a 59/1a: “- - - He (Allah*) is exalted in Might - - -.” Is he? There nowhere – absolutely nowhere - is any proof for his might or power. There are lots and lots and lots of big words and boasting, but not one single valid proof – not one. And PS: Who in the normal world are the ones that have to rely on big words and boasting? – the ones that lack true facts.

002 59/b: “- - - (Allah is*) the Wise.” See 58/7 just above and 40/75 + 41/12.

003 59/16: “- - - the Worlds!” Muhammad believed there were 7 (flat) Earths. Wrong. See 65/12.

00b 59/21: “Had We (Allah*) sent down this Quran on a mountain - - -”. Was it really an omniscient god that sent it down? See 41/12 and 40/75.

004 59/22: “Allah - - - knows (all things) - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12 - and others.

005 59/24a: “- - - heavens - - -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22.

006 59/24b: “(Allah* is) the Wise - -”. See 59/1 + 40/75 + 41/12.

Surah 59: At least 6 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 60:

001 60/1a: “- - - they (non-Muslims) have rejected the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. See 40/75 and 41/12.

002 60/1b: “- - - the (Prophet (Muhammad*)) - - -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true - if not he is a false prophet.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

003 60/2: “- - - they (non-Muslims*) desire that ye (Muslims*) should reject the Truth.” As for truth: See 40/75 and 41/12. As for the rest, may be the Quran is right – but for entirely different reasons from what that book claims. Islam in its pure Quranic form is a very destructive, inhuman and immoral religion, and when on top of that it is shiningly clear that the Quran is not w divine work, we do not want our descendants to end up in something like that

004 60/5: “(Allah*) - - - the Wise.” See 58/7 + 40/75 + 41/12.

005 60/10: “And Allah is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom.” See 40/75 and 41/12.

006 60/12: “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

Surah 60: At least 6 mistakes.

Sub-total till here: 1634 mistakes + 197 likely mistakes.

NB: If you find any mistakes anywhere, please inform us. If it is a real mistake, it will be corrected.

NB, NB, NB:

1. Read first the 2 small chapters "Some Essentials for how the Quran is to be read and understood" (VII-10-1) and "The Quran is to be understood literally if nothing else is indicated" (VII-10-2).

2. http://www.1000mistakes.com is blocked by many Muslim authorities. To debate with persons in such areas, cut and paste what you want from the pages and send it under titles different from http://www.1000mistakes.com.

3. http://www.1000mistakes.com is one of 9 pages which Muslim organisetions warned especially against in 2008 and 2009 - it could make especially procelytes lose their belief in Islam; correct and "down-to-the-earth" information works. In this connection it is worth noting that in the "warning" http://www.1000mistakes.com was one of 3 which neither was accused of bringing wrong facts, nor of being a hate page.

4. Comment 141 (to verse 6/149) in “The Message of the Quran” (see point 5) explains (translated from Swedish) about Allah's claimed omniscience vs. man's claimed free will:

“With other words: The real connection between Allah’s knowledge about the future (and consequently about the unavoidable in what is to happen in the future*) on one side and man’s relatively (!!*) free will on the other – two statements that seems to contradict each other – lies outside what is possible for humans to understand, but as both statement are made from Allah (in the Quran*) both must be true”. Unbelievable. Blind belief is the only correct and intelligent way of life, even in the face of the utterly impossible!!

5. And an afterthought: In the book “The Message of the Quran”, certified by Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Islamic Research Academy in Cairo (one of the 2-3 top universities in the Muslim world on such subjects) in a letter dated 27. Dec. 1998, it is admitted rather reluctantly that there are no proofs for Allah, and that it is not possible to prove him. An additonal point here is that if there is no proof for Allah and impossible to prove him, automatically there also is no proof for, and impossible to prove Muhammad's claimed connection to a god. And if there is no Allah and/or no connection between Muhammad and a god, what then is Islam?

6. Further: All the mistakes, contradictions, etc. in that book prove 100% that the Quran is not made by an omniscient god - no god makes such and so many mistakes, etc. If then Islam is a made up religion, what then about all the Muslims who have been prohibitted from looking for a real religion (if such one exists)? And where will they in case wake up after living and practising such an inhuman war religion like Islam is according to the Quran (and to Hadiths), if there is a second life somewhere? - Hell or Paradise?

7. NB and PS: No matter how sure you are about something, if it is not proved, it is not knowledge, only belief or strong belief, and can be wrong. Only what is proved or possible to prove is knowledge.

(As http://www.1000mistakes.com is blocked in many Muslim areas - which shows they are afraid of it and lack arguments (if they had real arguments for http://www.1000mistakes.com is wrong, blocking was unneccessary) - "cut and paste" whatever you want from it and send if you want to inform or to debate there. Remember to omit the name http://www.1000mistakes.com).

PS: If we are blocked centrally - f. ex. by spam (there is too much at times already from unfriendly sources) we will reopen with new address somewhere else, and announce the new address om f. ex. http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam. Also if your comments to us do not reach us, any comments posted on the thread "What is it with http://www.1000mistakes.com ?" (or make a page containing "1000 mistakes" in the title yourself if you want) on that forum will be read by us - it is a big international debate page.

Please inform all and everybody and all relevant fora - f. ex. Internet pages for debate or information - about the address http://www.1000mistakes.com. It is information that is urgently needed by many, not least by Muslims. No god made a book with so many mistakes and other wrongs - and if the Quran and Islam are made up by humans or dark forces, where are the followers of this inhumanly dark and brutal war religion heading for in a possible next life?