1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 67
18 May 2014
SURAH 67: AL-MULK (The Dominion)
(Mecca, 618 - 619 AD)
001 "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.
002 67/1a: "- - - He (Allah*) in Whose hands is Dominion - - -". Similar often claimed, but never proved.
003 67/1c: "- - - and He (Allah*) over all things hath Power". They claim so, but he never has proved his power - only loose words till now.
004 67/2a: "- - - He (Allah*) Who created Death and Life - - -". Again this never proved, but interesting claim - interesting just because Allah never has proved such things, whereas Yahweh has proved it several times if the Bible or the Quran is correct on this point. And remember: According to science the Bible is not falsified in spite of Muhammad's strong claim and his only way to explain away the differences between his own stories and the original in the Bible. (This also is thoroughly proved by Islam, as they have been unable to find even one clear falsification). Also Yahweh and Allah is not the same god, in spite of Muhammad's never proved claims - the teachings are fundamentally by far too different. Also see 6/2b, 11/7a, 21/56c and 41/5e above.
005 67/2c: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Exalted in Might - - -". But a might never clearly demonstrated - only words and claims. Words and claims are cheap. Also contradicted by the Bible.
006 67/2d: "- - - He (Allah is*) - - - Oft-Forgiving". Allah can forgive nobody unless he exists and is a god.
As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.
####007 67/3a: “He (Allah*) Who created the seven heavens one above another - - -”. It is hardly possible to state the Quran’s picture of our sky more accurately and clearly than this. Neither is possible to be much more wrong, especially when we add that according to the Quran the heavens are held up by invisible pillars, that the heavens are made from something material (if not you could build them and not fasten the stars, etc. to them), that the stars are fixed to the lowest heaven (37/6-7, 41/12) with the sun (?) and the moon between the heavens, and that the stars thus must be below the moon, and that the stars also double as shooting stars to chase away spying Jinns and bad spirits - and everything as said kept up there by invisible pillars resting on Earth. See 67/5a and 67/5b below and not least 65/12 . Who composed the Quran - a god or someone not omniscient? Muhammad perhaps? (And 71/15 even confirms “one above the other”).
This is not even fairy tale quality today - even small children know it is wrong.
Who made the Quran?
You find these claims about 7 heavens/firmaments/tracts in 2/29d-f, 17/44a, 23/17a-b, 23/86a, 41/12a-e, 65/12a-c, 67/3a+b, 71/15a+b, and 78/12a-b - all together the Quran mentions "heavens" in plural at least 199 times; there is no doubt the Quran means there are 7 heavens (and as the stars are fastened to the lowermost of them - f. x. 67/5a - they have to be material ones - if not the stars could not be fastened to it). In 67/3 you also are told they are placed one above the other, which means they of course are built successively higher above the Earth - which also is clear from most places in the Quran where the place of the heavens are indicated. Some modern Muslims try to place the heavens in space, deep space included. But among others 67/3 prohibits this, as "up" and "down" ("one above the other") has no meaning as part of the real space.
By the way: 65/12b also claims there are 7 Earths, and gives their names according to Islam.
The 7 heavens, its guardian angels, and its gates:
7.Gharibya, angel Razquel, gate made from shining light.
6.Rafqa, angel Shamkhael, gate made from white pearl.
5.Ratqa, angel Kalkael, gate made from gold.
4.Arqlun, angel Salsael, gate made from silver.
3.Aun, angel Saadiel, gate made from topaz.
2.Faydum, angel Michael, gate made from ruby.
1.Birqi, angel Ismael, gate made from emerald.
Also see 41/12b above.
Similar list from A. Birckov:
1.Ramaka Humans Under it: Strong wind protected by 70ooo angels. (There nowhere under us is wind - only over us (in the stratosphere).
2.Halda Amis Eating own bodies and blood. + all kinds of horrors for the condemned.
3.Arkadir (Qays?) Scorpion big as mules, snakes like dogs, Other strange and terrifying creature + fire/water ogres, and fish ogres.
4.Ruin Jilla A mountain like great snakes to frighten sentenced people. The Jillas have wings like birds, but no eyes, hands, or feet.
5.Malsam Hajla Cannibals.
6.Sijin Al-Qutat Birdlike. Also the settlement of souls of residence in Hell, to be punished by angels. Fire sea + terrible tragedies. Also "the book of debauchees" is here.
7.Ajiba Khutuk (terrible ogres) Will destroy Gog and Magog. Stronghold of Satan in the middle part.
This list at least makes it clear that Ramaka = our Earth.
That the creation took 6 days, is mentioned at least in 10/3 – 11/7 – 25/59 – 32/4 – 50/38 - 57/4. But on another place says 2 + 4 + 2 = 8 days. Muslims claim the first 2 are included in the 4, but that is not what the Quran says.
Just like your teacher of geography told you? And who created this nonsense? - an omniscient god?
##008 67/3b: “He (Allah*) Who created the seven heavens one above another - - - in the Creation of Allah”. This is one of the more morbid mistakes in the Quran - and remember that according to that book, the heavens had to be made from something material (if not the stars could not be fixed to the lowest heaven). Nature has got this much more correct - maybe it was nature that created it, not Allah (or Muhammad?). For extra measure, read 67/14: “Should He not know - He that created? - - - and is well acquainted (with everything*).” To say the least of it: Unintended irony. And hardly possible to get more wrong or a better proof for that Allah did not create and then make the Quran. Also see 41/12a above.
The essence here is that it is so howlingly and laughably obvious to see that this is wrong. No god had made mistakes like this. Then who made the Quran?
###009 67/5a: “And We (Allah*) have (from of old), adorned the lowest (37/6-7, 41/12) heaven with Lamps (Stars*)- - -”. The Quran’s picture of cosmos is taken from Greek and/or Persian astronomy, and as any secondary school child not blinded by religious indoctrination can see; it is much wrong - laughably wrong. For one thing the heavens have to be made from something material to make possible fixing the stars to one of them. Besides: From Greek etc. astronomy we know that the planets, stars, sun and moon were fixed to 7 different heavens. As the stars according to the Quran are fixed to the lowest, they have to be lower than the than the moon. But what happens if you try to place say Betelgeuse or even Helios - our sun - below Luna - our moon?
Further: Our rockets cannot go too high - they will collide with the material heavens. Muhammad said the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. The Quran says the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. Islam says the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. Muslims say the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws. All of them say the Quran is perfect and without mistakes or flaws because Allah sent down a book he had made or which had existed forever - a book which is the revered “Mother Book” (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22) in the heaven of Allah - and an omniscient god can neither make mistakes nor revere texts containing lots of mistakes, contradictions, flaws and hallmarks of cheats and deceivers, at least a few lies, etc. Also see 67/3 above and 67/5b+c just below.
BUT WHAT DO ALL THOSE WORDS HELP WHEN THE MISTAKES, CONTRADICTIONS, FLAWS, AND LIES ARE THERE ANYHOW? #####AND WHEN ISLAM TELLS THAT THE TOTAL LACK OF ANY MISTAKE IN THE QURAN PROVES IT IS FROM ALLAH, WHAT THEN DOES MEGA BLUNDERS LIKE THIS PROVE?
##010 67/5b: “- - - and We (Allah*) have made such (lamps (stars*) as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones - - -”. Well, well. Any secondary school child able to see that the entry from the same verse 67/5a were wrong, would laugh from this: Stars fastened to the lowest heaven and then doubling as shooting stars to drive this away! Today it is clear such "information" only belongs in fairy tales, and hardly even there as even children know better. Also see 67/3 and 67/5a. Who made the Quran?
No further comments - except that you find similar in 15/17-18 - 37/10 – 72/8.
011 67/5d: Some very clear and not to be misunderstood - or explained away - messages:(A67/5 – omitted in 2008 edition): “We (Allah*) have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven (out of the 7 the Quran frequently tells about, and which Muhammad even visited*) with lamps (stars*), and We have made such (lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones - - -.” But the disagreement concerns: Is it the stones in the shooting stars that chase jinns, etc. away? – the Arab word “rudjum” – plural of “radjm” means “throwing of stones” or “stoning” (one name for the Devil f.x. is “ar-radjim” = “the stoned one”). Or is it the fire? – the Quran really mention the fire. Once more: Start guessing. (The 2008 edition of “The Message of the Quran” even has got a new one – at least new to us: The Quran is not talking about stars used like shooting stars, but used as objects for divination by the bad astrologers. They need a lot of easy words to reach that conclusion, but so what? – as we have indicated before: Sometimes the religion is more essential than honesty and intellectual integrity. Though we have touched this theme before, we ask again: What does it indicate that a religion has to resort to cheating and dishonesty? Normally such methods mean that one does not have real arguments. In religion there also is the serious fact: If there is a next life, and if a religion needs to base its life on lies – even only partly – that is a strong indication for that that religion is not based on the truth. And in that case its believers will not wake up in any Paradise.)
FOR A LOT MORE SEE 67/12b ABOVE.
012 67/5f: "- - - the Blazing Fire". Hell.
###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.
013 67/6b: "- - - their (peoples'*) Lord and Cherisher - - -". Here the Quran means Allah. But many people mean they have another "lord and cherisher" - f.x. Yahweh. If one or more of these others - as mentioned f.x. Yahweh - exist(s), they should be in a safe position - and especially will they be better off if their god exists, but Allah not.
014 67/9a: "Allah never sent down any (message) - - -". Most likely they were right. What is absolutely sure: If Allah exists and is a benevolent, omniscient god, he did not send down the Quran and Muhammad's teachings - too much is wrong, and parts of the moral code are immoral, not to say horrible. And if he sent it, he neither is an omniscient, nor a good and benevolent god.
015 67/9b: "- - - (message (the Quran*)) - - -". If it is a message, then from whom? No god ever was involved in a book that full of errors. Then remain: Dark forces (f.x. the Devil dressed up like the angel Gabriel - Muhammad would have no chance to see the difference). A sick brain (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - like modern medical science suspects, which can give illusions and symptoms like Muhammad is said to have experienced. Or one or more cold and scheming brain(s) liking power - f.x. Muhammad's own. Those are the alternatives.
######016 67/9c: "(Non-Muslims said*): '- - - ye (Muslims*) are in nothing but an egregious delusion". As for the Quran, all the mistaken facts and other errors, the contradictions, the low quality of the book as literature, the unclear language, etc. prove with mathematical certainty that the book is not from any god. As for Allah he of course could have existed in spite of the fact that the Quran is a made up book - made up by dark forces or by humans. But when you add Allah's background - he originally was the pagan god al-Lah - perhaps with the extra name Hubal - which Muhammad simply dressed up, and without the slightest proof claimed was the real god and the only god and the same god as Yahweh. Then you add Muhammad himself - a man who wanted respect and power, not to mention riches for more power - and women, and a man who did not hide that he believed in the use of dishonesty to reach a goal (he lied even in the Quran - f.x. the "explanation" that nobody would believe anyhow, even if Allah proved himself by making some miracles; Muhammad was too intelligent and knew too much about people to believe in that claim himself. And there was al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth), etc., even though they were not formalized until later. And not to forget "War is deceit - war is betrayal", and "break your word/promise/oat if that gives a better result - pay expiation later if necessary - 2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2).
Add this and add to Muhammad's unreliability and low morality (easy to see in the Quran if you skip the glorification and read the reality) the fact that neither Muhammad, nor Allah ever was able to prove anything at all of any essence concerning Islam or Allah, add the fact that Allah has not manifested himself one single time neither during the life of Muhammad, nor afterwards, manifested or proved himself in any way - numbers of claims, but not one single proved case. Add the fact that both science and even more so Islam (they have searched harder) have delivered so strong circumstantial and empirical proofs for that the Bible is not falsified, that it practically is a mathematical proof (44ooo : 0 in reality is a mathematical proof) - and that thus Allah's claimed history disappears, as he is not the same god as Yahweh (the teachings and everything are fundamentally and morally too different) - yes, not only disappears, but are proved to be made up and wrong.
Add all this, and you end up with a probability for his existence far below one to a million. The empirical proofs for that he does not exist, are so strong that it practically is a mathematical certainty.
Then finally add the Muhammad's and Islam's partly immoral moral code, their partly unethical ethical code, their very immoral code of war and terror, their code for dishonesty, betrayal, the at least few lies in the Quran etc., their partly unjust judicial code, their political code (apartheid/fascism/Nazism), and the Quran's cultural code (f.x. knowledge = knowledge related to Islam only), you end up with such a strong circumstantial and empirical proofs proof for that if Allah after all exists, he is no good and/or benevolent god, that also these in praxis are so strong, that they together are to be classified together with mathematical proofs in strength and reliability.
And to what paradise does a religion lead if built on a made up book - in worst case made up by dark forces - and worshipping a god which does not exist, or at best is the pagan, dressed up and malevolent god al-Lah?
Or to what Hell if there somewhere exists a real god Muslims are prohibited from looking for?
#####017 67/10a: “Had we (non-Muslims*) but listened or used our intelligence - - -”. Islam often tries to tell that it is intelligence which makes Muslims believe, or intelligence that you have to see from the Quran that it is a work from a god - often the claim also is used as flattery (13/3j above). What at least is sure, is that anyone who uses his intelligence and has a reasonable minimum of knowledge of f.x. history, geography, astronomy, archaeology, etc., will find a lot of mistakes in the Quran - if he not for some reason is blind or do not want to see. Also: If he knows a very small minimum of logic and the rules for using logic and for evaluating information, he has to see the lose statements, the invalid “signs” and the as invalid “proofs” - and maybe he will be struck by the thought: Who uses this kind of arguments, except one who has no real arguments, and therefore has to cheat and deceive - f.x. to gain followers and power? Also see 67/9c above.
##018 67/10d: (A67/8): "Reason, properly used, must lead man to a cognition of Allah's existence, and thus of the fact that a definite plan underlies all His creation". Scientifically this sentence is nonsense, but you several places in the Quran, and even more so in Islamic scholars' explanations of the texts, find claims about that reason "must" give this and this conclusion, or similar strengthening the claims of the Quran or Islam. The trouble is that such claims also just are claims and wishful thinking, and prove nothing unless they are backed by proofs. Islam and its Muslims have no proofs about any central point in Islam, and try this way to construct proofs by means of claims about reason and intelligence, but both scientifically and logically this is nonsense, as you do not have a proof unless you have a proof. "A proof is one or more proved facts which can give only one conclusion". Also see 67/9c above.
Some other quotes about proofs and invalid or made up proofs:
"Strong claims need strong proofs.
"A claim without a proof may be dismissed without a proof".
"Claims are cheap, but only proofs are proofs".
"The use of invalid proofs normally proves that something is fishy".
"The cheat or deceiver naturally must rely on claims pretending to be facts or proofs".
"A made up "proof" makes the man very suspect".
"A strong belief is not a proof - not necessarily even a truth".
"Wrong claims and invalid "proofs" are working tools of the cheat".
"A student with correct facts gets a more correct answer than 20 professors with wrong facts". (Invalid, "signs", claims, "proofs", etc. of course are wrong facts.)
And we may add from Peer Gynt in his original language: "Naar utgangspunktet er som galest, blir resultatet tidt originalest" - freely translated: "When you conclude from wrong claims/wrong facts/invalid "proofs"/etc., you get wrong conclusions".
019 67/11a: "- - - sin - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.
One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.
020 67/11b: "- - - far will be (Forgiveness) - - -". There only are two who can forgive: The victim and a god. This means that unless Allah exists and in addition is a god - neither of which is proved - he cannot forgive anyhow.
As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.
021 67/12b: "- - - those who fear their Lord (Allah*) unseen - - -". In the Quran and in Islam blind belief is hailed as an ideal - quite naturally, as that in reality is all Muhammad had and Islam has to offer - a lot of claims from a doubtful man liking power, money (at least for bribes) and women, but no proof.
022 67/12c: "- - - Forgiveness - - -". There only are two who can forgive: The victim and a god. This means that unless Allah exists and in addition is a god - neither of which is proved - he cannot forgive anyhow. Besides: How is it possible to forgive without changing details in Allah's predestined Plan, which nobody and nothing can ever change, according to several statements in the Quran?
As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.
023 67/13a: “He (Allah*) certainly has (full) knowledge, of the secrets of all hearts”. Then why does he have to test his followers??!!- 2/233.h Also see 40/75.
024 67/13b: "- - - certainly - - -". See 2/2b above.
025 67/13c: "- - - knowledge - - -". See 26/83a above.
026 67/14a: "- - - He (Allah*) that created - - -". See f.x. 6/2b, 11/7a, 21/56c and 41/15f above.
#####027 67/14b: (YA5570):"He (Allah*) Who creates must necessarily know His own handiwork". This is very correct, so that when the Quran shows he clearly does not know the reality, it is a strong proof for that something is very wrong somewhere concerning/in the Quran - and thus also concerning Muhammad and Islam.
THIS SENTENCE COMBINED WITH ALL THE ERRORS AND WORSE IN THE QURAN, SHOULD PROVE THAT THE QURAN IS NOT FROM THE MAKER OF THE WORLD, OF THE UNIVERSE, AND OF LIFE (claimed by the Quran to be Allah).
028 67/14c: "- - - (Allah*) understands the finest mysteries (and) is well acquainted (with them)". All the mistaken facts in the Quran prove this sentence wrong. And prove wrong the never proved claim that a god is behind the Quran.
029 67/15a: "It is He (Allah*) who has made the earth manageable for you (people*)". One of the many never documented claims in the Quran. See 11/7a above.
030 67/15b: "- - - the Sustenance which He (Allah') furnishes - - -". What you get for a living, is not a result of your work, but a gift from Allah, according to the Quran. Why work?
030 67/15c: "- - - unto Him (Allah*) is the Resurrection". An interesting claim, as Allah never has proved his power for resurrection - there only, like so often in the Quran, are undocumented claims and easy words. See 7/158i - and for that case 5/110d above.
031 67/16: "- - - He (Allah*) Who is in heaven - - -". Similar often claimed, but never documented. Like so often in the Quran there only are claims and words - and even only the words of a not too reliable person. We may add that according to Hadiths he is above the (7.) heaven.
Another point is that according to the Bible it is Yahweh who is in Heaven, not Allah.
032 67/17a: "- - - He (Allah*) Who is in heaven - - -". See 67/16 above.
033 67/17b: "- - - My (Allah's*) warning - - -". Allah can warn nobody unless he exists and is something supernatural. And if it is not his warning, then who's?
034 67/18c: "- - - then how terrible was my rejection (of them) (non-Muslims*) - - -". There were scattered ruins in and around Arabia, and there were tales about former people and tribes. Muhammad claimed that their deaths were all samples of his punishment for sins. A claim science - and common sense - doubt to say the least of it; there are many other possible reasons in a harsh and warlike area.
##035 67/19a: “None can hold them (the birds*) up except (Allah) - - -”. Wrong. What keeps the birds up, are the laws of aerodynamics. (Of course Muslims can use one of their favorite last resorts: Declare that Allah made those laws. But then they will have to prove that - not just use cheap words which any priest in any religion can use about any claimed god.) Also see 11/7a. Similar in 16/79a+b above.
036 67/19b: "- - - (Allah) Most Gracious - - -". See 1/1a and see if you agree.
037 67/19c: "- - - truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim. See 2/2b above.
038 67/19d: "- - - it is He (Allah*) that watches over all things". Only possible if Allah exist and in addition is a major god, none of which is ever proved.
039 67/20a: Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, and the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and see if you agree to this verse. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we always believe in the demands and deeds - words are too cheap to use and disuse.
040 67/20d: "In nothing but delusion are the Unbelievers". This may be true if: 1): Allah exists. 2): If he in addition is a major god (and not f.x. something from dark forces pretending to be a god). 3): If in addition the god the non-Muslim believes in, does not exist. 4): Allah is correct described among all the errors in the Quran. Also see 67/9c above.
041 67/21c: "- - - withhold His (Allah's*) provision - - -". Allah can neither provide nor withhold anything unless he exists and is something supernatural. Also see 67/9c above.
042 67/21d: "- - - impiety - - -". Nothing is impiety towards a god, unless that god exists. Also see 67/9c above.
043 67/21e: “- - - flight (from the Truth)". But who are fleeing from the truth and the fact that much is wrong in the Quran? - a god does not make mistakes, and at least not wholesale. Also see 13/1g and 40/75 above.
044 67/21f: "- - - (- - - the Truth)". That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact - the claim actually is proved wrong. See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.
045 67/22a: “Is then one who walks headlong, with face groveling (non-Muslims*), better guided - or one who walks evenly on a Straight Way (Muslim*)?” A rhetoric question with an obvious answer - Muslims of course are best. Especially when they obey Allah and make war or in other ways kill or suppress non-Muslims, and steal from them or worse - they are the top of the social and moral and human pyramids. Especially on the ethical and moral pyramids(!!).
046 67/22b: “Is then one who walks headlong, with face groveling (non-Muslims*), better guided - or one who walks evenly on a Straight Way (Muslim*)?” The correct answer in reality will depend on if the claimed straight way really is straight, or if the straightness in reality is an illusion or f.x. a result of blindness or wishful thinking. There also is a strange word far behind in our brain: Was Muhammad also a populist - populists within politics like to make things look easy, etc.
047 67/23b: "It is He (Allah*) Who has created you - - -". At least not in all the ways the Quran claims it was done - and actually science has found that man was not created, but developed from earlier primates. Also see 6/2b above. (Or if it here is meant you as a single person, see 11/7a above).
048 67/23c: "- - - (Allah*) made for you the faculties of hearing, seeing, feeling and understanding - - -". See 11/7a above.
049 67/23d: "- - - little thanks do ye (non-Muslims*) give (Allah*)". There are little thanks to give as long as we honestly believe Allah has done nothing for us. Yes, that he does not even exist.
050 67/24b: "It is He (Allah*) Who has multiplied you through the earth - - -". Many will protest and tell that multiplying they have managed themselves - and with pleasure. Also see 11/7a above.
051 67/24c: "- - - to Him (Allah*) shall ye (people*) be gathered together (at the Day of Doom*)". Often claimed, never proved. One of the many claims in the Quran any believer in any religion can make on behalf of his/her god(s) free of charge, as long as it is possible to evade all requests for proofs.
052 67/25c: "When will this promise be (fulfilled)? - if ye (Muhammad*) are telling the truth." One of the many requests for something reliable about his new religion, Muhammad received for both friends and foes. He never was able to prove anything at all. No proof ever given. No promise provably from Allah ever given. Definitely no promise from Allah ever provably honored by him.
053 67/25d: "- - - the truth". See 2/2b, 13/1g, and 40/75 above.
054 67/26e: “- - - I (Muhammad*) am (sent) only to warn plainly in public.” But 3 - 4 years later (from 622 AD) he started to take on more dirty and inhuman jobs, too. This verse is abrogated – made invalid - by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 28 abrogations).
055 67/27b: "- - - this is (the promise (from Allah*) fulfilled) - - -". Easy words - but there only are words in the Quran. Words without proofs are ever so cheap, especially when they come from a person of very doubtful moral who had much to gain from making his followers believe in his tales.
056 67/27c: "- - - (the promise (from Allah*) fulfilled) - - -". There never was one single claimed promise from Allah which was provably fulfilled by him. Many claims, but never a proved case. This is one of the cases Islam had screamed about if it had happened, and there never was such a scream.
057 67/27d: "- - - which ye (non-Muslims*) were calling for!" This refers to non-Muslims who were daring Muhammad to ask Allah punish them as proof for his existence and as proof for Muhammad's connection to him. Muhammad never was able to do neither this, nor to bring any other proof.
058 67/28b: "- - - His (Allah's*) Mercy - - -". See 1/1a above.
059 67/28c: "- - - who can deliver the Unbelievers from a grievous Penalty?" The answer will depend on if there exist gods, and in case which one(s). At least Yahweh can, if the Bible tells the truth. Also see 67/9a above.
060 67/29c: "- - - on Him (Allah*) we put our trust - - -". Rather risky, as long as not even his existence is clear, not to mention proved. Also see 67/9c above.
061 67/29e: "- - - manifest - - -". See 2/2b above.
#062 67/30c: (A67/22): "Just as water is an indispensable element of all organic life, so is a constant flow of moral consciousness an indispensable prerequisite of all spiritual life - - -". This may tell something about spiritual life in Islam, as its moral code partly is immoral or strongly immoral. (Compare it to "do to others like you want others do to you", and judge for yourself.)
8435 + 62 = 8497 remarks.
Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".
>>> Go to Next Surah
<<< Go to Previous Surah
This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".