1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 60

 

SURAH 60: AL-MUMTAHANAH (The Examined One)

(Medina, 629 or more likely early 630 AD)

 

001   "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 60/1d: “- - - they (non-Muslims) have rejected the Truth (the Quran*) - - -”. For many what happened, was that they saw the Quran could not be the truth. (That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact.)

003 60/1e: "- - - the Truth (the Quran*) - - -". That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

004 60/1f: "- - - the Truth (the Quran*) that has come to you (Muslims*) - - -". As there are so many errors in the Quran, this is not even a Kitman (a lawful half-truth), but an al-Taqiyya (a lawful lie - and in Islam it is not only permitted to lie when you promote or defend Islam, it is advised to do so "if necessary") - so much is wrong in the Quran, that it is not the truth. This even more so as all the mistakes in the book prove that the Quran is not from any god, and for the other because Muhammad - proved by the Quran and Hadiths - accepted and himself used dishonesty as a working tool, and thus easily may have used it in the Quran, too (actually he did - at least a few times). Proofs are strongly needed, but not one valid one exists.

There simply are too many wrong facts and other errors in the Quran to be the truth.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

005 60/1j: "- - - My (Allah's*) Good Pleasure - - -". Impossible unless he exists and is something supernatural.

006 60/1k: "- - - I (Allah*) know full well all that ye (people*) conceal - - -" - so do not try to cheat on Allah - or in this life on Muhammad. But also see 2/233h above.

007 60/1m: "- - - the Straight Path". The road to the Quran's and Islam's Paradise. Also see 10/9f above. 

###Also in the Bible you find roads used for a symbol in a similar way - "the wide road" going to Hell and "the narrow road" going to Paradise. Is there an extra symbol in the fact that "the Straight Road" and "the wide road" both has the same meaning "The Easy Road" - the one which according to the NT leads to Hell? I who write just this was struck by this parallel and its symbolism even the first time I saw the expression in the Quran, and the dark sides of the Quran later has made that thought and feeling more intense.

008 60/2b: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

#####009 60/2c: “- - - they (non-Muslims*) desire that ye (Muslims*) should reject the Truth.” That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. As for truth: See 13/1g and 40/75 above. As for the rest, may be the Quran is right – but for entirely different reasons from what that book claims. Islam in its pure Quranic form is a very destructive, inhuman and immoral religion of hate, apartheid, suppression and war - compare the moral and ethical codes in the Quran and Islam to the gold standard and the basis for all true inter-human morality: "Do against others like you want others do against you" before you protest - and when on top of that it is shiningly clear that the Quran is not a divine work, we do not want our descendants to end up in something like that, not to mention as members of it.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

010 60/3a: "He (Allah*) will judge between you (on the Day of Doom*)". This only can be true if Allah exists and in addition is a god (and not f.x. something dark pretending to be a god - several aspects of the Quran may indicate this).

011 60/3c: "- - - for Allah sees well all that ye do." Why does he then need the witnesses which are mentioned time and again in the Quran? - no logic. But sentences like this also are "carrots and sticks": Be good and obedient and end in Heaven, be bad and disobedient and end in Hell. And one more thing: If Allah sees everything, why then 2/233h above?

012 60/4j: "- - - forgiveness - - -". According to the Quran, Abraham's god was Allah. But Allah can forgive nobody and no-one unless he exists and is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

013 60/4n: "In Thee (Allah*) we (Abram/Abraham and other Muslims(!!)*) we trust - - -". Anyone trusting Allah is in for a surprise if he does not exist (not to mention if he belong to the dark forces) or is wrongly described among all the errors in the Quran - especially if there is a next life, especially since Islam is a kind of religion few good or benevolent gods will accept.

Another point is that as mentioned according to the Bible Abraham's god was Yahweh, not Allah (who at that time - if he "existed" that early - likely was the pagan god Il (the earliest known name for Allah). Actually we roughly know the story of Il, later named al-Ilah, later named al-Lah, later named Allah (and perhaps named Hubal - see 1/1d above). He through all times until 610 AD when Muhammad took him over, was a pagan, polytheistic god, at least much of the time a moon god - never until 610 AD and Muhammad he was a monotheistic one.)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

We may add that originally Hubal was the moon god in Arabia, and some sources say the Kabah originally was his temple and dedicated to him. But when Muhammad was born, al-Lah - sometimes named Allah - may have taken over as Arabia's main god. It is a bit ironic that a building dedicated to an old moon god (be it Hubal or al-Lah/Allah - because also Allah had been a moon god and the crescent moon still is his symbol) was and is the most holy place on Earth for a claimed only and claimed omnipotent god - and as ironic is the fact that if Muhammad had been born earlier, Islam's god might have been named Hubal, not Allah (Muhammad simply took over the claimed mightiest of the pagan Arab gods, and earlier Hubal was reckoned to be the most powerful one - and the moon god like al-Lah had been and perhaps still was).

########We have not mentioned much about al-Lah/Allah's position in the Kabah before Muhammad. The reason is that it is quite unclear. There are the two gods mentioned as the main god for the Quraysh tribe = the main god in the Kabah: Hubal, the moon god, and al-Lah/Allah - also a moon god, at least in southern parts of Arabia. There are clear indications, but no proofs, for that these two really and simply were two names for the same god - perhaps with Hubal as his "personal" name and al-Lah/Allah his title (al-Lah/Allah means "the god", or in this case "the main god").

There also are indications for that there were connections between Hubal and the Ba'al known from f.x. the Bible - same god and similar name, but in another variety of religion. If this is true, the Quran and Islam are way beyond the Milky Way when they forward claims like Zachariya prayed to Allah/Hubal/Ba'al, or that Jesus preached about Allah/Hubal/Ba'al, as in those times such connections would be known, even if they are forgotten today, and Ba'al represented the Devil to the Jews of those times. (Also see second part of 1/1d)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

014 60/4o: "- - - to Thee (Allah*) is (our) Final Goal". Not true unless Allah exists, and in addition is a god. Well, it may be true also if Allah exists, but is something dark like aspects of the Quran may indicate - but in that case the end station is not Paradise.

015 60/5a: "- - - a (test and) trial - - -". Why does an omniscient and omnipotent god who on top of all predestines everything, have to test anybody at all?

016 60/5c: "- - - forgive us (claimed good Muslims*) - - -". But Allah can forgive exactly nobody unless he exists and is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

017 60/5d: "Thou (Allah*) art the Exalted in Might". As mentioned before: At least he has never proved this might.

018 60/5e: “(Allah*) - - - the Wise.” Not if he is behind the Quran.

019 60/6d: "- - - truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

020 60/6e: "- - - Allah is - - - Worthy of all Praise". Read 1/1a and see if you agree.

021 60/7b: "For Allah has power (over all things) - - -". Often claimed, never proved - there only are the words of a man of doubtful moral, and with a liking for power, wealth - at least for bribes - and women.

022 60/7c: "- - - Allah is Oft-Forgiving - - -". Allah cannot forgive anybody unless he exists and is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

023 60/7d: "- - - Allah is - - - Most Merciful". Read 1/1a above and see if you agree.

024 60/8b: "- - - justly - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, and partly unjust sharia laws.

025 60/9d: "- - - wrong". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

026 60/10f: "He (Allah*) judges (with justice) - - -". See the Quran's partly immoral moral code and its partly unjust Sharia laws and weep - or laugh.

027 60/10g: “And Allah is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom.” Not if he made the Quran - a book full of mistakes.

028 60/11b: "- - - fear Allah - - -". This only can have a purpose if he exists and is something supernatural - black or white.

029 60/12b "- - - falsehood - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

030 60/12d: "- - - just matter - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, very immoral war code, partly unjust judicial code, etc.

031 60/12e: "- - - Allah is Oft-Forgiving - - -". Allah cannot forgive anybody unless he exists and in addition is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

032 60/12f: "- - - Allah is - - - Most Merciful". Read 1/1a above and see if you agree.

033 60/13d: "- - - the Wrath of Allah". Fiction if he does not exist and in addition is something supernatural - white of black.

034 60/13e: "Of the Hereafter they (non-Muslims*) are already in despair - - -". Wrong. No real believer in a religion - any religion - despairs about the next life, as he believes in the promises of his religion. This is a fact an intelligent man knowing so much about people like Muhammad did, knew. But the claim is good propaganda.

035 60/13g: "- - - the unbelievers are in despair about those (buried) in the grave". A complicated way of saying they do not believe in resurrection from the graves. But this is an Arabism. The old Arabs did not think much about a next life, and could be skeptical to its existence, but in the rest of the world most people believed in a next life. Would a universal god use such an Arabisms in his claimed universal and holy book?

8169 + 35 = 8204 remarks.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".