1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 59

 

SURAH 59: AL-HASHR (The Gathering)

(Medina, 624-625 AD)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 59/1b: "- - - the Praises and Glory of Allah - - -". Read 1/1a above and see if you agree - if he exists and if he in case is a major god, nothing of which is proved.

003 59/1c: “- - - He (Allah*) is exalted in Might - - -.” Is he? There nowhere – absolutely nowhere - is any proof for his might or power. There are lots and lots and lots of big words and boasting, but not one single valid proof – not one. And PS: Who in the normal world are the ones that have to rely on big words and boasting? – the ones who lack true facts.

004 59/1d: “- - - (Allah is*) the Wise.” Not if he is behind the Quran.

005 59/2a: “It is He (Allah*) Who got out the Unbelievers (the Jewish tribe Banu al-Nadir*) amongst the People of the Book from their homes at the first gathering (of the forces).” This was an expulsion of non-Arabs (Jews) from Medina, after Muhammad found an excuse to act armed against them – Muhammad actually wanted to kill them, but one of the Arab tribes who had a covenant with some of them, made that impossible for him the first time – he still was not strong enough military. This happened shortly after the battle of Badr in 624 AD. It was one of Muhammad’s first step towards becoming economically really self-sufficient as he “took over” all their land, etc., and an essential step towards absolute power in Medina. Here it is treated as a laudable, glorious act. "It is the winner who writes the history - and he sometimes color it".

006 59/3a: "And had it not been that Allah had decreed banishment for them (the Jewish tribe Banu Nadir - Banu means tribe*) for them - - -". There exists a Scandinavian word "poelsevev" - literally meaning "a weaving made from sausages" - which means utter nonsense with a large dash of stupidity included. This tale is "poelsevev" - Muhammad simply was forced to let them go because a strong Arab tribe (the Khazraiites under Abd Allah b.Ubayy) demanded it, even though he wanted to murder the men and enslave the women and children like he f.x. later did with bani Qurayza, when he was military stronger.

PS: Which god would use "poelsevev"?

007 59/3b: "- - - in the Hereafter they (the Jews from the tribe Banu al-Nadir) shall (certainly) have the Punishment of the Fire". See 3/77b above.

###008 59/4a: "That (see 59/2a, 59/2d, 59/3a above) is because they resisted Allah and his Messenger (Muhammad) - - -". This is very interesting information, because practically all Muhammad's armed conflicts were because of aggression from the Muslims - even Badr, Uhud, and The Trench were defense battles in a war of aggression started and kept alive by Muhammad and his raids against caravans, etc. Also in this case it seems that Banu al-Nadir had not helped an enemy, but they had not helped Muhammad, and they were negative to him and Muhammad found an excuse to attack (NB: Most Muslims honestly believe Banu al-Nadir helped some enemy, because that is what they are told). Thus what Muhammad really is saying here, is that it is prohibited to defend yourself from his/Islam's aggression and raids for money and slaves, or other aggression.

######Beware of a crucial word her: "resisted". Not "attacked", but "resisted".

"The Religion of Peace"!! And "The Religion of Honesty".

009 59/4b: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". Muhammad's standard, but never proved mantra for imprinting on his followers his position of power - is it a lie? A claim does not become truer by being repeated often, but many repetitions may make people start believing this claim anyhow. Remember Goebbels: "If a lie is repeated often enough, people start believing it".

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran. Power was the main thing Muhammad sought - and riches to gain more power. The Quran clearly indicates that power - and respect - meant even more for him than women. And he was eager for (young) women - willing ones and not willing ones - and at least one child.

010 59/4g: "- - - verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See f.x. 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

011 59/4h: "- - - Allah is severe in Punishment". See 3/77b above. And one question: Allah or Muhammad?

012 59/5c: "- - - transgressors - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses this and related words, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and when it is used in religious connection, it means everybody not living according to the Quran, or at least everybody resisting it.

013 59/6b: "- - - Allah gives power to His Messengers over any He pleases". But strangely enough normally not without fighting and normally not unless the Muslims turned out to be the strongest. Strange for a claimed omnipotent god. Napoleon said: "God is with the strongest armies". It may seem that Allah needed strong armies to win.

014 59/7a: “What Allah has bestowed on His Messenger (Muhammad*) (and taken away from) the people of the townships (= stolen/robbed from vanquished people*) belongs to Allah – to his Messenger and to kindred and orphans, the needy and the wayfarer” – and what is not mentioned here: For Muhammad himself and his big family (though it is likely to be true that he did not live in luxury), for payment to the ones who distributed the riches, for “gifts” to make undecided persons becoming or staying Muslims, for in other ways promoting the religion, and not least to financing more wars. Also the fixed “poor tax” all Muslims who are not too poor have to pay, also are for all these purposes (though it may be true he did not use from this personally), and as often a lot did go to fighting and other things, it is a question if the name “poor tax” is quite correct. Also see 59/6a above.

################But there remains one fact Muslims and Islam never touches: To take/steal/rob from others is dishonesty. Especially when the robber was/is the aggressor - like Muhammad's Muslims nearly always were - there is no way to escape from this fact.

015 59/7g: "And fear Allah; for Allah is strict in punishment." We once more meet the fact: Only if he exists and is something supernatural.

016 59/8c: "- - - Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". Muhammad's standard but never proved mantra for gluing himself to his god and his platform of power.

####Note how close Muhammad attaches himself to the power of his claimed god - in plain words: "Obey me - Muhammad". You find this many, many places in the Quran. Power was the main thing Muhammad sought - and riches to gain more power. The Quran clearly indicates that power - and respect - meant even more for him than women. And he was eager for (young) women - willing ones and not willing ones - and at least one child.

017 59/13c: "- - - (sent) by Allah". There was never a proved case of anything sent by Allah - never. Lots of claims, but never a proved case.

018 59/13e: "- - - devoid of understanding". Who has the least understanding: The one unable to understand that something is seriously wrong with the Quran, or the one able to understand it?

019 59/14b: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) are a people devoid of wisdom". See 59/13da and 59/13e above.

020 59/16a: "- - - Allah, the Lord of the Worlds!" Similar often claimed in the Quran, but never proved - and contradicted by the Bible which says Yahweh is the lord of the world (you do not meet the 7 worlds in the Bible), not Allah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

021 59/17a: "The end of both (non-Muslims*) will be that they will go into the Fire - - -". This is another not documented claim in the Quran. But there is an open question: The Bible claims and the Quran admits that the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh exists (though the Quran wrongly mixes him up with Allah) - and if any or both of those two books tell the truth, Yahweh even has proved both his existence and his power. Whereas exactly nothing is proved about Allah - not even his existence - everything just is an unproved claim from a man believing in dishonest methods and with much to gain if people believed in his tales. Who are most likely to end in the fire for believing in a not existing deity - Jews or Muslims?

And there also is the fact that there are such wide gaps between the Quran's moral code of war, and normal moral codes, that even if one is doomed to Hell by Allah, Yahweh may strongly disagree and judge you are a good persons worthy of Paradise. (Compare "do against others like you want others do against yourself" to the two's moral codes, and judge for yourself.)

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

022 59/17c: "- - - dwelling therein (Hell*) forever", This may be wrong as f.x. 6/128c and 11/107b and at least 4 other verses may indicate that Hell is not quite forever (and 11/108c may indicate the same for Paradise). Islam has no good explanations for this - just some claims and presumptions, especially when it comes to the fate of the paradise and it inhabitants.

023 59/17d: "Such (Hell*) is the reward for the wrongdoers". Only if the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth. Also see 59/17a above.

024 59/17f: "- - - wrongdoers". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

025 59/18b: "Fear Allah - - -". There is no reason for that unless he exists and unless he in addition is a god. (Well, there may be reason to fear him also if he belongs to the dark forces.)

026 59/18d: "Yea, fear Allah: for Allah is well acquainted with (all) that ye (people/Muslims*) do". Yes, be good and obedient Muslims, including going to war, etc. But also see 2/233h and 59/18b above.

027 59/19b: "- - - He (Allah) made them (non-Muslims*) forget their own souls!" This is wrong unless Allah exists and in addition is a god.

028 59/19d: "- - - transgressors - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses this and related words, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and when it is used in religious connections it means everyone who does not accept Islam, or at least everyone who opposes Islam,

029 59/20a: “Not equal are the Companions of the Fire and the Companions of the Garden : it is the Companions of the Garden that will achieve Felicity.” There is no doubt: In the eyes of Allah the Muslims are best. And in the eyes of Muhammad they surely were best - - - because they gave him power and warriors? But at least the eyes of Allah will depend on if he exists or not.

030 59/21d: "- - - verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See f.x. 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

031 59/22b: “Allah - - - knows (all things) - - -”. See 2/233h, 13/1g, 40/75 - and others.

032 59/22c: "- - - He (Allah*), Most Gracious, most Merciful". See 1/1a above.

033 59/23a: "Allah is He, then Whom there is no other god - - -". There at least is the problem with Yahweh - Both the Quran and the Bible claim that the old god of the Jews both exists and has proved his existence - and it is clear that the Muslim never documented explanation (Allah = Yahweh) is wrong (too fundamentally different teachings, moral code, etc.). And there is the problem with Allah - he has never proved anything, not even his existence (there only are words from a dubious man and self proclaimed "messenger").

####034 59/23c: (YA5402): Here we just want to quote “The Meaning of the Holy Quran”: “How can a translator reproduce the sublimity and the comprehensiveness of the magnificent Arabic words, which means so much in a single symbol?” ###But this is just another and glorified way of saying: “How can one translate from a language where the words are so little precise and so vague in meaning, that it is difficult to know what is really meant”.

035 59/23e: "- - - (Allah is*) the Holy One - - -". This is claimed all over the Quran, but never proved one single time - not even his very existence is proved.

036 59/23f: "- - - (Allah is*) the Source of Peace (and Perfection) - - -". Just read the some 22 - 24 surahs from Medina, and you see the unintended black joke hidden in this claim - and the in double meaning literally bloody irony in this al-Taqiyya (lawful lie - a specialty you only find in Islam of the big religions).

037 59/23g: "- - - (Allah is*) the Guardian of Faith - - -". Allah can be the guardian of nothing unless he exists and is something supernatural - white or dark.

038 59/23i: "- - - (Allah is*) the Preserver of Safety - - -". There never was a god of war who was the preserver of safety - war always means risk and danger and being unsafe - - - and death to many.

039 59/23j: "- - - (Allah is*) the Exalted in Might - - -". Often claimed, NEVER proved. Not even his very existence is proved.

040 59/23k: "- - - (Allah is*) the Irresistible - - -". There are many who have been able to resist him - by not becoming Muslims or by leaving Islam. But the real reason for being able to do so, may be that he does not exist?

041 59/23l: "- - - (Allah is*) the Supreme - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is the supreme one, not Allah. In the Bible Allah is so insignificant that he is not even mentioned - and the same goes for his preachers and followers and his very religion of dishonesty, apartheid, hate, and war. That is to say he may have been lumped together with others under the name "false gods", and his preachers under "false prophets". But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

042 59/23m: "Glory to Allah!" Please read 1/1a above and see if you think he deserves it - if he exists.

043 59/23n: "(High is He (Allah*)) above the partners they attribute to him". Wrong. Non-Muslims do not attribute partners to Allah. They believe in other gods INSTEAD of Allah, and do not at all believe that Allah is a real god (if they had done, they had become Muslims at once). Also see 25/18a above.

And if he does not exist, he is not high above anybody at all.

044 59/23-24: Many and panegyric words about Allah. If they are true, they are true. If they are not true, they do not become truer by using many of them. And it does not help that the Quran is not from a god - it both is heresy and slander and an insult to a god to claim he has made a book where so much is wrong. Islam has serious hallmarks for being a made up religion.

045 59/24a: "He is Allah, the Creator - - -". See 11/7a, 21/56c and 41/15f above.

046 59/24ba: "- - - whatever is in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and on earth, doth declare His (Allah's*) Praise and Glory - - -". "Whatever" not "whoever" - once more animism or even anthropomorphism - hallmarks for primitive pagan religions and for fairy tales.

047 59/24d: "- - - He (Allah*) is the Exalted in Might - - -". - which he in case never has proved. Only words.

048 59/24e: “(Allah# is) the Wise - -”. Not if he made the Quran with all its mistaken facts and other errors, contradictions, etc., etc.

8121 + 48 = 8169 remarks.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".