1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 56

 

SURAH 56: AL-WAQI'AH (The Inevitable)

(Mecca, 615 AD)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 56/2: "Then (at the Day of Doom*) will no (soul (beware here is said soul - normally the Quran claims resurrection in body*)) entertain falsehood - - -". Not even an al-Taqiyya (lawful lie) or a Kitman (lawful half-truth) or a Hilah (lawful deceit/circumvention)? (Three kinds of dishonesty which are among the permitted ones "if necessary" in Islam - the only one of the big religions embracing dishonesty). Or at least a never proved claim.

003 56/7: “(At the Day of Doom*) ye shall be sorted out in three classes. - - -. One small class for the ones who will get extra treatment in Paradise, one big for normal treatment there, and one big for Hell.

A clear difference to the Bible. In the Bible there is no "elite" class, only "to Paradise" or to Hell". One more proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god. If they had been the Day of Doom had been the same in both books.

004 56/7+10a: “(At the Day of Doom*) ye shall be sorted out in three classes. - - -. And those (the class*) Foremost (in Faith) will be the foremost (in the Hereafter)”. There are classes also in Paradise (and according to other verses and to Hadith, they are split in at least 4 or 6 sub-classes + the higher heavens for outstanding Muslims. And 7 classes in Hell.) A reality if it is a reality. A good way of motivating followers and warriors – strive and fight harder and advance in the next life – or for the ruler(s) and spoils of war only, if the religion is made up, which at least the Quran is (by man or dark forces - no god was involved in a book of that quality).

005 56/8: "- - - what will be the Companions of the Right Hand?" According the other places those will be the good Muslims, going to Paradise - the right side was the good side in Arabia.

006 56/9: "- - - what will be the Companions of the Left Hand?" According the other places those will be the bad people, going to Hell - the left side was the bad side in Arabia.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

007 56/11: "These (the best Muslims*) will be those nearest to Allah". Hadiths describe this as the better you are of the top Muslims, the higher heaven you will end in Paradise - Muhammad of course in the highest, no. 7, together with Abraham. Jesus, however, is not much above an average Muslim, it seems, because he only ends in the 2. heaven - the real reason may be that he was the only real competitor for Muhammad, and should be reduced as much as possible.

But how many of Muhammad's family and descendants and in-laws (if not, Fatima would not have her family around her, etc., etc.) did qualify for the seventh Heaven? But perhaps Fatima and he children had to follow her husband to her parents-in-law? Questions like that are not clarified in the Quran.

008 56/12: "- - - Gardens of Bliss". The Quran's Paradise - see 10/9f above.

009 56/15-16: “(They (the pious Muslims*) will be) on Thrones encrusted (with gold and precious stones), reclining on them, facing each other”. This means long double rows of thrones – millions or perhaps a few billions of thrones in double rows facing each other. More, if also the women and children and all the houris shall recline on thrones. Also there has to be some space between the rows, as there have to be places for resting on carpets as mentioned in other verses, and for the fruit trees and the water.

But endless double rows of thrones does not sound like our idea of a perfect paradise, no matter how many houris for free use and good food and drinks, as the nearly only pastime except for sex, is some polite and not intellectually demanding conversation - the only alternative mentioned. See also quote 56/25-26 below.

010 56/15-23: A description of Allah's Paradise. Does anyone see any difference between this and a poor, naive, uneducated warrior's dream of a royal life included a suitable harem, and this? Very - VERY - different from Yahweh's Paradise in the Bible, where you "become like the angels" (f.x. Luke 20/36). Another point: In Yahweh's Paradise there are no houris and even no married couples any more - no sex. And being like an angel, you need no food - a sharp contrast to Muhammad's description of delicious things to eat and drink. Yahweh the same god as Allah? You are free to believe it if you are logically blind.

011 56/17: “Round about them will (serve) youths of perpetual freshness - - -.” Again these mysterious servants. The Quran is totally disinterested in them, and tells nothing about them except that they look attractive – the only person of interest is the Muslim adult man – strangely the same one who can be warriors for Muhammad and his successors. Others do not count much. But there is a hidden fact here: Homosexuality is strongly frown at in Islam, but all the same silently accepted in some areas. The description of these youths, makes one wonder.

And: What are they - the servants and the houris? Where do they come from? How is Paradise for them? (Some Muslim scholars speculate about the possibility that they may be humans who died as babies or children - but their parents are promised to have their children as part of Paradise, and then they cannot be servants or sex doll for others.)

##012 56/18-20: “(Servants) with goblets, (shining) beakers, and cups (filled) out of clear-flowing fountains (of wine*): No after-ache will they receive therefrom, nor will they be suffering intoxication: (and good food – meat and fruits*) - - -.” This surah is from ca. 615 AD – before Allah found out that alcohol was not good. But at least in Paradise even in 615 AD you did not grow ill or get a head-ache from plenty of wine. One may here remember that in the pre-Muslim Arabia, sex and alcohol were "the two delightful things" - Muhammad's god seems to satisfy both, perhaps even homosexuality on top . Is the word "populism" hidden somewhere in the Quran? (If you go looking, you find it many places).

013 56/20-21: "And with fruits, any that they (Muslims in Paradise*) may select: And with the flesh of fowls, any that they may desire". There is excellent food in the Quran's Paradise - - - but in the Bible's Paradise you are like angels (f.x. Mark 12/25) and do not need food - there is not one word about a need for food or drink in Paradise in the entire Bible. Yahweh and Allah the same god? Just guess. Actually the fundamental differences in the two paradises are one of the strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

014 56/22: “And (there will be) Companions with beautiful, big, and lustrous eyes - - -.” The houris again - like 37/48a-c above – see that or 55/56c. There are no houris in the Bible's Paradise. Yahweh and Allah the same god? - no, not even if there is heavy schizophrenic, as schizophrenia cannot explain so highly different Paradises. One of the absolute proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

###015 56/24: “(The houris are*) A reward for the Deeds of their past (life).” How do women like to simply be a reward to some previously unknown – and often uncultivated – man? – and to be his sex slave or sex doll for eternity? A Paradise? This kind of sex-trade in the name of the god, gives us a sick and distasteful feeling. Paradise like a luxury brothel? What is for sure is that this claimed paradise is not even a distant relative of the one in the NT. The same god? Do not be ridiculous - a 200% proof.

The "institution" of houris - sex slaves - Muhammad borrowed from the old pagan Zoroastrians - the religion of the old Persia. There they were named paaris.

016 56/27-34: “The companions of the right hand (here the good, but not top pious and/or warriors*) - - - (will be) among the Lote-trees without thorns - - - trees with flowers (or fruits) piled one above another - - - in shade - - - by water flowing constantly, and fruits in abundance - - - and on Thrones (of Dignity) - - -(and houris in the next verses – their wives are not mentioned*) - - -“. Not quite like the top class, but at least “on par” with kings and likely the top of dreams possible for uneducated, primitive more or less brutes. But each and every thing in reality just fit to satisfy basic and base earthly dreams of men and potential warriors of the primitive kind and from primitive circumstances. Not a thing beyond that. Compare this to f.x. Matt. 22/30: "At the resurrection (= in Paradise*) people will neither marry not be given in marriage (not to mention sex outside marriage*); they will be like the angels in heaven". Yahweh and Allah the same god with so different Paradises? - an imbecile question. And a 200% proof for the opposite.

017 56/30-31: "- - - In shade long-extended, by water flowing constantly - - -". An Arabism. The Quran's Paradise mirrors the dreams of dwellers in hot deserts. Hardly any place in the Quran you find the dreams of people from chilly and perhaps wet countries. Did not Allah know such places existed when he(?) made his holy book for all Earth?

Not from the Bible.

018 56/32: "- - - fruit in abundance - - -". Earthly luxury. And a small detail mentioned by the Hadiths: No matter how much you eat and drink, you never have to go to the toilet in Paradise.

Not from the Bible. According to the Bible you become like the angels (f.x. Matt. 22/30), and according to standard belief, angels do not need fruits or other food. One more indication for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - their paradises are different, and too different.

019 56/34a: "- - - (Muslims in Paradise will sit*) on Thrones (of Dignity), raised high". The maker of the Quran is unable to go beyond the bodily and the social pleasures - the top dreams of members of backwater primitives. F.x the intellect will go very hungry in Muhammad's Paradise - boring beyond anything credible in the long run. To sit on a throne - a highly decorated and high chair - in endless rows of such chairs, for thousands of years, really is to be in a Paradise, and to be of high esteem there!

Very different from the Bible. One more proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god. If they had been, their Paradise had been one and the same.

020 56/34b: "- - - (Muslims in Paradise will sit*) on Thrones (of Dignity), raised high". But the Arab text (A56/13) in reality says "- - - on couches raised high". But to sit on couches does not sound as dignified. To sit on thrones sounds much better.

021 56/35: “We (Allah*) have created (their Companions (houris*)) of special creation". Which may be the reason why nobody knows from where they come. It is a mystery in Islam. (But the idea came from Persia.)

The houris simply were sex slaves and courtesans, an idea extremely far from the Bible's, Yahweh's, and Jesus' Paradise (they are "borrowed from the Zoroastrian paradise, where they were named paaris - also the handsome male servants were "borrowed" from there). A very strong proof for that Yahweh and Allah were not the same god - and Jesus and Muhammad not in the same religion.

022 56/35-37a: “We (Allah*) have created (their Companions (houris*)) of special creation. And made them virgin-pure (and undefiled) – beloved (by nature), equal in age (for good Muslim men in Paradise*) - - -.” Houris are a bit special kind of women, but the “fact” that they are given to the men arriving in Paradise as repayment for good (?) deeds, tells miles and square miles about Islam’s view of women. The servile nature of the houris – the ideal women – in the descriptions, also tells volumes about Islam’s point of view on how women shall behave.

The houris simply were sex slaves and courtesans, an idea extremely far from the Bible's, Yahweh's, and Jesus' Paradise (they are "borrowed from the Zoroastrian paradise, where they were named paaris). A very strong proof for that Yahweh and Allah were not the same god - and Jesus and Muhammad not in the same religion.

023 56/35-37c: “We (Allah*) have created (their (Muslims*) Companions) of special creation. And made them (houris*) virgin-pure (and undefiled) – Beloved (by nature), equal in age - - -”. Try to find anything - anything - even remotely like this, or other hints of sex, not to mention abundance of sex, in the Bible's Paradise. Just go on and see what you find. Yahweh and Allah the same god with so bottomless different Paradises? - or Jesus and Muhammad in the same religion? No answer is necessary - the reality is too obvious. And to try to explain away the differences by claims about falsification of the Bible, is centuries too late - both science and Islam has thoroughly proved that there are not falsifications in the Bible (by being unable to find one single proved case in tens of thousands of relevant manuscripts, and by being unable even to give a credible explanation of how it should be physically possible to make identical falsifications in so many old papers spread over such wide areas - and without even leaving traces possible for modern science to detect). Another absolute proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

024 56/36: "And made them (the houris*) virgin-pure (and undefiled) - - -". This is information which is totally irrelevant if you do not intend to hint about sex - and you can bet a continent on that sex was on the mind of the Muslim warriors when being told things like this.

025 56/45: (Hell is punishment -) "For that they (the ones ending there*) were wont to be indulged, before that (before they ended in Hell*) in wealth (and luxury) - - -". This was in 615 AD and the Muslims mainly were from the poor classes, whereas the rich and mighty opposed Muhammad. Under such conditions pep-talk like this, may be good psychology. You find much like this in the Quran.

026 56/46: "- - - Wickedness supreme - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code (just in this case the powerful ones opposed Muhammad and his new religion).

027 56/50a: "All will certainly be gathered together for the meeting appointed for a Day well-known". With all the mistakes in the Quran, and with the certainty that no omniscient god has ever made a book with so many mistakes, etc., it is absolutely certain that this claimed appointment is no certainty.

028 56/51a: "- - - truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim. See 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

029 56/51c: "- - - wrong - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

030 56/51d: “- - - and treat (truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood! - -”. The Quran at best is partly true (and as it is from no god with all its errors, hardly true at all). Similar claim in 56/92. Also see 13/1g, 40/75 and others.

031 56/51e: "- - - (truth) - - -". See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

032 56/51f: "- - - Falsehood - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and when used in religious context it means anything not in accordance with the Quran. Also see 2/2b, 13/16 and 40/75 above.

033 56/52: "- - - the Tree of zaqqum". A tree growing in Hell. It bears horrible fruits the inmates of Hell have to eat - because also in Hell you need food. No tree is mentioned in the Bible's hell.

Not found in the Bible. One more indication for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - also their hells are too different for that.

###The big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

034 56/57a: "It is We (Allah*) Who have created you (humans*) - - -". See 6/2b, 11/7a,21/56c and 41/15f above.

035 56/57b: “- - - the Truth (the contents of the Quran*) - - -“. But the contents of the Quran at best only are partly true – too much is wrong. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. See 40/75 above.

036 56/59: "Is it ye (people) who created it (your semen*), or are We (Allah*) the Creator?" It is your body who has created it. See 11/7a above and 56/64a+b below.

037 56/60a: "We (Allah*) have decreed Death to be your common lot - - -". This only is possible if Allah exists and is a major god. And this is one more of Muhammad's never proved claims.

038 56/60b: "We (Allah*) have decreed Death to be your common lot - - -". See 11/7a above.

039 56/61: "- - - creating you (again) - - -". See 21/56c+e and 41/15f above.

040 56/64a: "Is it ye (humans*) who cause it (seeds*) to grow, or are We (Allah*) the cause?". If Allah is the cause, he at least never has proved it - one of the many, many natural phenomena Muhammad claims for glorification and indication of his god, but always without proving that it really is Allah who does it. Totally invalid as glorification. Totally invalid as indication or proof. See 11/7a above.

##041 56/64b: "Is it ye (humans*) who cause it (seeds*) to grow, or are We (Allah*) the cause?". This is a technique of debating where you (try to) lead your opposite part by the nose, by using rhetoric questions and limiting the permitted answers. Here the answer which is the most likely to be the correct one - nature - is omitted. Also it is treated as a matter of fact that Allah exists, something which in no way is a proved fact - a technique of debating you meet even more often in the Quran. The idea is not to find the truth, but to win the debate. You meet these kinds of techniques pretty often from Muslims - f.x. demanding proofs from the Quran for things they know is not clear in the Quran. (F.x. "Prove from the Quran that Dhu'l Quarnayn is Alexander the Great". This is thoroughly proved by science and also in central Islamic literature - f.x. by Ibn Hisham in Ibn Ishaq: "The life of the Prophet": "Alexander was a Greek (he was from Macedonia, but was king of Greece*) and he founded Alexandria - it is a historical fact that Alexander the Great founded Alexandria. But it is not clear in the Quran - on the other hand no Muslim ever mentions that it also is not clear in the Quran that Dhu'l Quarnayn was not Alexander.) Such a limitation is nonsense if proofs exists other places, but it makes the Muslim the winner of the debate if his opponent is stupid enough to accept the limitations.

Besides: It is up to Muslims to prove that Allah causes it to grow, as it is they who put forth the claim - not for you to disprove it.

042 56/65: "Were it Our (Allah's*) Will - - -". Claims like this you find many of in the Quran - but it never happen to be his will. Like children or others boasting. Or bluffing.

043 56/70a: “- - - We (Allah*) could make it (all rain*) salt - - -”. Not without changing both natural and physical laws. Salt simply does not evaporate (not until some 1200 degree C), and then as simply cannot rain down (some spray from the sea is caught by the wind, but far, far too little to make rain salty). If Islam insists it is true, they will have to prove it - words are cheap. (There is one extra comment here though: Droplets blown up from the sea may dry before they reach the sea again, and micro particles of salt may drift in the wind. But this effect is too small to give salty rain.)

044 56/74b: "- - - (Allah*), the Supreme!" This only can be - not is, but can be - true if Allah exists and is the top god (he cannot be the only god in case, as the Quran accepts that the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him with Allah).

Also contradicted by the Bible, which says that Yahweh is the supreme.

045 56/75a: “Furthermore I call to witness - - -". Why does an omniscient and omnipotent god need witnesses? - does he feel he is not trusted?

046 56/75b: (A56/26): “Furthermore I call to witness the setting of the stars”. The Arab word “mawqi” – plural “mawaqi” – literally means “the place (or time) where (when) something falls down”. And the Arab word “nudjum” – here called “stars” – also may mean something like “chapters”. “Ergo” and “voila”: A more pious translation: “I call to witness the coming-down in parts (of this Quran)”. Do not omit the possibility that wishful or “correct” thinking may influence interpretation. Here at least are two meanings – though the first one is the most accepted one. But also see 56/75b just below.

047 56/77a: "This is a Quran Most Honorable - - -". Mistaken facts "en gross", other mistakes, partly immoral moral code, partly Unethical ethical, code unjust laws, even lies and broken oaths, war mongering, hate mongering, apartheid mongering - Most Honorable?

048 56/77b: "This is a Quran Most Honorable - - -". To be a little flippant: If Muhammad's Quran is the most honorable, we have to hope we - and the world - never meet a dishonorable one.</>

049 56/80a: "A Revelation (the Quran) - - -". But is the Quran a revelation? - and in case from whom, as a book of that quality is not from any omniscient god? (The alternatives are: From dark forces/a devil, from a sick brain (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - like modern medical science suspects), or from one or more cold brain(s) - or a combination of these).

050 56/80b: “A Revelation (the Quran*) from the Lord of the Worlds (Allah*) - - -”. Can it really be so? See 41/12 - and 40/75. Impossible – no omniscient god would make/deliver a book with so many mistakes, contradictions, etc. – not to mention keep it in his own Heaven as a revered Mother Book (13/39 - 43/4). Can this be a revelation from a god? Or the other way around: Can something producing so many mistakes, contradictions, so much invalid logic be lord and god of even one world? Also see 2/131 – 6/155 – 7/196 – 8/41 – 11/14 – 13/1 - 13/19 – 13/37 – 14/1 – 15/1 – 16/102 – 20/4 – 26/109 – 26/127 – 26/192 – 31/21 – 32/2 – 34/6 – 36/5 – 43/43 – 45/2 – 46/2 - 47/9.

051 56/81a: "Is it such a Message that ye (skeptics*) hold in light esteem?" Yes, that is the only intelligent thing to do with tales so full of mistakes and other errors and even some lies, at least until at least a minimum is proved.

052 56/81b: "- - - a Message (the Quran) - - -". But is the Quran a message? - and in case from whom, as a book of that quality is not from any omniscient god? (The alternatives are: From dark forces/a devil, from a sick brain (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - like modern medical science suspects), or from one or more cold brain(s) - or a combination of these).

##053 56/82: "And have ye (skeptics*) made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false?" Absolutely not necessary, as the Quran itself by means of all its errors, etc. proves 100% and more that something is seriously wrong with the book - and thus also with Muhammad and with Islam. The only strange and curious thing is that so many are able not to see the mistakes, etc. in the book, and the inevitable meaning and consequence of them. Human brainwashing and conditioning and "the belief of your fathers", are strange psychological facts.

054 56/83: "Then why do ye (humans*) not (intervene) when (the soul of the dying man) reaches the throat - - -". One thing here is that the word "intervene" is not in the original Arab text - the translator has added it to give "the clear and not to be misunderstood language in the Quran" meaning. Another thing is: Does a dying soul pass through the throat? - in case how do you see this so that you know when to intervene? - and how do you intervene to stop it?

055 56/85: "But We (Allah*) are nearer to him (a man*) than ye (humans*) - - -". Often claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere. As said before: Words are cheap, proofs are reliable.

056 56/87: "- - - call back the soul (of a dead person) - - -". Muhammad never proved a comma of the central points of his religion, but he demanded profs from anyone else - which shows 2 things: He was unable to prove anything - if not he had used proofs - but all the same he found proofs essential - if not he had not demanded it from others. In this case he even demands a proof he knows it normally is impossible to produce (the main thing obviously was not to find the truth, but to win the debate) - though you find some possible cases in the Bible.

057 56/89: "(There is for him (Muslim*)) Rest and Satisfaction, and a Garden of Delights". The Quran's and Islam's Paradise - see 10/9f above. If Allah exists and is a god (which he does not if he f.x. belongs to the dark forces).

058 56/91a: "(For him is a salutation), 'Peace be unto thee', from the Companions of the Right Hand". = If the Quran tells the full truth and only the truth - and if Allah exists and is a god.

059 56/92a: “- - - those who treat (Truth (the Quran*)) as Falsehood - - -”. There really is a question: What is true and what is false in the Quran - see 13/1g, 40/75 and 41/12 and others. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. (Actually it is proved that at most parts of it are true.)

060 56/92c: "- - - (Truth) - - -". See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

061 56/92d: "- - - Falsehood - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. But also see 2/2b, 13/1g, and 40/75 above. Finally beware that when the Quran uses words like this in religious connection, it means anything not in accordance with the Quran.

062 56/92-93: “For him (the sinner*) is Entertainment with Boiling Water and burning in Hell-Fire.” Now boiling water is much colder than normal fire, but all the same far too hot for the human body. And remember you are bodily resurrected according to the Quran - if you are able to believe so.

The use of boiling water is nowhere mentioned in the Bible's Hell. One more indication for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

###And the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells put together, are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

063 56/95a: "Verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See f.x. 49/13b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

064 56/95b: “Verily, this (the description of hell in the Quran*) is the Very Truth and Certainty”. Why should what the Quran says about Hell be more true and certain than the rest of the book, with its many mistakes and errors? – Islam in case will have to bring some proofs instead of cheap words. See 42/7 above and other places.

###And the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

065 56/95c: "- - - the Very truth - - -". That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. All the wrong fact, etc. actually prove that the Quran maximum is partly true. See 2/2b and 49/13b above.

066 56/95d: "- - - the very truth and certainty - - -". Our experience is that the cheater, etc. are the ones without true facts, but who strongest insists on that certainly he is telling the very truth (others often have real facts or proofs to show for themselves).

067 56/95e: "- - - Certainty". See 2/2b and 49/13b above.

068 56/96a: "- - - celebrate with praises the name of thy (Muslims'/people's*) Lord (Allah*) - - -" For one thing there is no proved reason for doing so, for another see 1/1a above and see if he deserves so in any case - - - if he exists.

069 56/96b: "- - - (Allah*), the Supreme". This only can be - not is, but can be - true if Allah exists and is the top god (he cannot be the only god, as the Quran accepts that the old Jewish and Christian god Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him with Allah).

7861 + 69 = 7930 remarks.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".