1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 54

 

SURAH 54: AL-QAMAR (The Moon)

(Mecca, 614 AD?)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 54/1c: (YA5128): “- - - the moon is cleft asunder.” This is not explained. It may refer to:

A tale based on a claim saying that once the moon appeared to be cleft asunder at the time of Muhammad (a claim mentioned in the Hadiths).

A future sign of the approaching Day of Doom (the likely meaning according to f.x. Raghib and Zamakhshari (A54/1)).

Just a metaphorical statement. (Rather unclear speech from a god?)

In addition A54/1 tells that it may mean an optic illusion.

But many Muslims claim it is one of Muhammad's strong miracles, in spite of that Muhammad did not have the gift of making miracles, according to the Quran and according to Islam.

What is practically sure, though, is that the Quran talks about something which is going to happen in the future - before the Day of Doom - and not something which has happened. This also according to the majority of Muslim scholars.

003 54/2b: "- - - a Sign - - -". There does not exist and have never existed a sign clearly showing Allah. The best proof for this is that if it had ever existed one, Islam had referred to it every second hour around the year.

004 54/3a: "They (non-Muslims) reject (the warning) - - -". What many rejected, was a new religion which they saw had a lot of wrong claims - f.x. concerning the Bible.

005 54/3b: “- - - every matter has its appointed time.” Predestination - Allah has appointed a time for each and every thing to happen.

006 54/5a: “(The Quran is - but also see 54/4 just above*) Mature wisdom - - -”. Hardly. See 13/1g, 40/75, and others.

007 54/6b: "Therefore, (O Prophet), turn away from them (the non-Muslims*)." Ca. 614 AD he had to turn away from them - but 10 years and more later? This verse is abrogated – made invalid - and contradicted by at least these later verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/38, 3/85, 3/148, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 8/12, 8/38, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many bloody threats, but also verses advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 28 abrogations).

008 54/6c: "Therefore, (O Prophet), turn away from them". Compare this to "The Lost Sheep" (Matt. 18/12-14), "The 11.th Hour" (Matt. 20/1-16), "The Lost Coin" (Luke 15/8-10), "The Lost Son" (Luke 15/11-31). Yahweh and Allah the same god? Jesus and Muhammad in the same religion? You have to be very both blind and ignorant to believe that. Also one of the strong indications for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

009 54/7: "- - - from (their) graves - - -". Remember that Muslims are not resurrected in spirit, but in body - one of the at least 200% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god: Their hereafters are too different - far too different.

010 54/9c: "- - - they (the people of Noah*) rejected Our (Allah's*) servant - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Noah was the follower of Yahweh, not of Allah (though Muhammad wrongly claimed the two were the same god - as normal for Muhammad without the slightest proof). Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

011 54/11: “So We (Allah*) opened the gates of Heaven (here = the religiously defined Heaven as it f.x. is written with capital “H”, not a substitute word for the sky or clouds*) with water pouring forth”. But the material heavens that Muhammad believed in, did not exist - and thus could not contain water.

012 54/12b: "And We (Allah*) caused the earth to gush (water for the Big Flood*) forth with springs - - -". It is physically impossible for Earth to gush forth that much water without leaving huge caverns where the water came from - far too huge not to collapse afterwards. There after all was so much water, that the Ark which likely started in what is now south Iraq, stranded on the 2089 m high Mt. al-Judi (11/44b) (not Ararat in Turkey like said in the Bible) according to the Quran (According to Wikipedia Mt. al-Judi lies in Anatolia in Turkey). Science has found no such collapsed caverns. (For the Ark to end on Mt. al-Judi, the Earth must have gushed forth approximately as much water as there today is in all oceans, seas, and lakes put together - and then swallowed it again later. Physically impossible.)

###013 54/12c: "- - - the water rose to the extent decreed". = To the extent predestined". You will meet Muslims saying the Quran is not talking about real predestination (to be able to claim man has at least partly free will). There is no reason to believe them - the Quran is very clear on predestination, and that predestination is full and complete, and that Allah predestines absolutely everything. The book also is very clear on that Allah does his predestination according to his Plan which nobody and nothing can change - - - which f.x. means that there is no free will for man, and that prayers in Islam has no meaning as everything already is predestined long time before. Not even a god can combine these two things with predestination - even Islam has given in to explain how that could be possible (that is to say, they have given in explaining predestination contra free will for man - predestination contra prayers and their futility if predestination exists, they never debate).

014 54/15b: "- - - a Sign - - -". There never was a Sign documented from Allah. See 2/39b above.

#015 54/17a: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” Anyone wanting to try to “explain” away difficult points like mistakes or invalid logic or contradictions by calling them allegories etc. should read this sentence, and there are a number of similar sentences in the Quran, so that there is no doubt Muhammad really meant it. It even is written 4 times just in this small chapter and thus a solidly cemented and nailed truth: The Quran is to be understood literally and search for hidden meanings is only for Allah, and such search only is for the ones “in whose hearts is perversity - - -.” .

Also see the chapter "Literal language in the Quran - according to the Quran" in "1000+ Comments on the Quran".

######T

More down to the Earth: Muslims often explains away mistakes, etc. in the Quran with the claim that what is written there is not what is meant - it is a parable or an allegory or something. A book where you have to guess what is literally meant and what is parables - and what the parables in case mean - definitely is not easy and explained.

######That the Quran tells - directly or indirectly, but clearly - that the texts in the Quran is clear, explained by Allah, and to be understood literally, you find f.x. these places: 3/7b, 3/138a, 6/114ca, 11/1b, 15/1b, 17/12h, 18/1d-e, 18/2a, 19/97b, 20/113b+c, 24/34, 24/54j, 26/2a, 27/1b-d, 28/2, 36/69e, 37/117c, 39/28b, 41/3da, 43/2a, 43/3c, 43/29b, 44/2b-c, 44/13d, 44/58b, 54/17a, 54/22b, 54/32a+b, 54/40a, 65/11f, and 75/19 Worth remembering each time a Muslim or Islam tries to "explain" away errors, etc. by claiming the text means something different from what it says. In such cases either the Muslim/Islam lies when he/she claims the text means something different from what it says (the claim often is that it is a parable or something), or the Quran lies when it says that the book uses clear texts where nothing else is indicated.

The listed points are all collected under 3/7b and 44/58b.

Or perhaps Allah is so clumsy and helpless when he explains things, that he needs help from humans to explain what "he really means"? (Nonsense to say the least about such claims behind such "explanations".)

WHO CAN EXPLAIN SOMETHING BETTER AND MORE CORRECTLY AND COMPLETELY THAN AN OMNISCIENT GOD?

Also see 54/17b below.

As serious: How reliable is a religion which accepts the use of dishonesty in its teaching?

016 54/17b: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” It clearly is in plain words which are easy to understand – and the allegories mostly explained or easy to understand. But no! - according to Islam and to many Muslims – much of it is allegories, parables, etc. with very hidden or different meanings - - - at least if that is the only way Muslims can “explain” away errors or mistakes. Also see 3/7 and 11/1 above. AND SEE 54/17a JUST ABOVE.

017 54/17c: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., and with a moral and an ethical code parts of which point to dark forces or worse?

018 54/18a: "The 'Ad (people) - - -". A tribe from old Arab folklore. It may or may not have existed, but in case hardly with the demise the Quran claims. If they existed, they likely lived in south Arabia.

019 54/18c: “The 'Ad (people) rejected (truth (the teachings of the Quran*) - - -.” Those teachings at best only are partly true – too many mistakes, etc. See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

020 54/21: "But how (terrible) was My (Allah's*) Penalty and My Warning!" See 3/77b above.

021 54/22a: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran - - -". Wrong - no god was involved in a book of a quality like the Quran with all its errors, contradictions, etc. And as no god made it, also no god made it easy - or difficult - to understand.

###022 54/22b: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” Anyone wanting to try to “explain” away difficult points like mistakes or invalid logic or contradictions by calling them allegories, parables, etc. should read this sentence. It even is written 4 times and thus a solidly cemented and nailed truth: The Quran is to be understood literally and search for hidden meanings is only for Allah, and such search only is for the ones “in whose hearts is perversity - - -.” . This is mentioned at least these places: 3/7, 11/1b, 19/97, 26/2, 41/3, 43/2, 44/2, 44/58, 54/17, 54/22, 54/32, and 54/40.

023 54/22c: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., and with a moral and an ethical code parts of which point to dark forces or worse?

024 54/23: "The Thamud - - -". A tribe from old Arab folklore - it may or may not have existed, but it is highly improbable that their disappearance was like what the Quran tells. If they existed they likely lived in and/or around Hirj, a mountainous area some 150 miles/240 km north of Medina. There still are old cave dwellings in the area, said to be made by the Thamud.

025 54/23-31: Thamud's claimed but never proved prophet, Salih, had problems similar to Muhammad's - Muhammad thus only had problems normal for prophets = Muhammad was a normal prophet = nice for his followers in 614 AD to know. Also the punishment of "unbelievers" was good psychology to tell followers: We are right and the others will lose.

026 54/24d: "Truly should we (non-Muslims*) then (if they followed a religion like Muhammad's new religion*) be straying in mind, and mad". As the Quran with all its errors, etc. is not from any god, this may be a correct statement. But one more nice and exact parallel to Muhammad's experiences.

And: When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

027 54/25: "Nay, he (Muhammad's parallel Salih*) is a liar, an insolent one!". As the Quran - and thus its twin (exact copies from the same claimed "Mother Book" in Heaven) claimed given to the claimed prophet Salih - with all its errors, etc. is not from any god, this may be a correct statement. It at least is clear that Muhammad lied at least some times in the Quran (f.x. when Muhammad claimed that real miracles would make no-one believe - he was too intelligent and knew too much about people, and he thus knew this was a lie; at least some would believe if they got proofs for Allah).

028 54/26: Pep-talk. Easy to claim, never proved. 

029 54/27: "- - - (- - - Salih) - - -". The claimed, but self-proclaimed prophet of the claimed (from Arab folklore) tribe Thamud. You never meet him other places than in the Quran and in stories derived from Muhammad.

030 54/27-29: "- - - the she-camel - - -". Of this story we originally were unable to understand the point - in a land where there are 2 dozen camels to the dozen, how could a camel be a sign of Allah? Then at long last we found the explanation: There was an old legend about a camel which came out from a sheer cliff and became a prophet. Of course this camel would be a sign or proof. But for one thing: Would an omniscient god going for a world religion, use a story no-one outside Arabia would understand - an Arabism - simply because they did not know the legend Muhammad built his story on? And besides it so obviously is a fairy tale, that today even many Muslims try to deny this connection - but this is the story.

031 54/31: "And We (Allah*) sent against them (the Thamud*) a single Mighty Blast - - -". A never documented point - like so many in the Quran. But a curiosity - and some contradictions:

In 11/67 and 54/31 they were killed by a mighty blast - an explosion of some kind (they are said to have lived in Hirj some 150 miles/240 km north of Medina, in a mountainous country and we have been told it is volcanic - though sleeping such - area, so a blast/explosion might perhaps have been possible, even though the main volcanic activity came to an end some 400ooo years ago).

But in 7/78 they are killed by an earthquake

And in 69/5 by a terrible storm.

At least 3 contradictions.

Comment YA2004 to 15/83 where they were killed by a mighty blast: "The mighty rumbling noise and wind accompanying an earthquake". There is no wind (and no blast, thunder or lightning) accompanying earthquakes - the mechanism producing wind is totally different, a fact even educated Muslim scholars know, but all the same they produces arguments like this. Intellectual dishonesty - there is a bit much of this in Islam. #####And in a religion using dishonesty/lies, how much is true of their arguments? - and of their religion?

#####The reason for this dishonesty, is that it is believed that "the people of the rocky tract" just is another name of the Thamud tribe. And in 7/78 the Thamuds were killed by an earthquake. 11/67 and 15/83 they were killed by a mighty blast. And in 69/5 they were killed by " terrible Storm of thunder and lightning!". Voila!: Make wind/blast accompany earthquakes or let the noise represent a blast to hide this mistake in the Quran - but forget the thunder and lightning! But neither wind nor blasts nor thunder nor lightning is a part of an earthquake.

#####Honesty too often is not essential for Muslims and Islam. The main thing is to make the Quran and thus Islam look like they are true. But when even persons like Muhammad Yusuf Ali uses dishonesty - here an al-Taqiyya (a lawful lie), how many more lies are there then in Islamic literature and argumentation? - and in the Quran and in Islam?

How reliable is a religion which accepts the use of dishonesty in its teaching?

032 54/32a: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -”. This in a way is very correct – the language is plain and simple, though often unclear or with two or more possible meanings, and the Quran itself makes it clear that one is to understand it literally (though many Muslims claim that verses with mistakes are allegories, parables, etc. – it is an easy way to use to flee from difficult questions).

The statement that it is easy to understand, also means that it is to be understood like it is written - if not it was not "easy to understand".

But it is all the same at least partly wrong – partly because there are so many places it is difficult to guess which word is really meant. Separate books are needed to explain the Quran - there are many such ones. And if you read any of the good ones, you will find that even today there are many points in the Quran Islam has not been able to understand, and even many more points they still do not know the exact meaning of - or which one of two or more meanings is the correct one. But it is easy to see that Muhammad meant it was easy and not complicated to understand - and an omniscient god had been able to compose a book that was possible to understand and impossible to misunderstand or not understand, just like Muhammad claimed and surely believed and intended. Who composed the Quran?

Also see the chapter "Literal language in the Quran - according to the Quran" in "1000+ Comments on the Quran".

######

More down to the Earth: Muslims and Islam often explains away mistakes, etc. in the Quran with the claim that what is written there is not what is meant - it is a parable or an allegory or something. A book where you have to guess what is literally meant and what is parables - and what the parables in case mean - definitely is not "easy to understand".

######That the Quran tells - directly or indirectly, but clearly - that the texts in the Quran are clear, explained by Allah, and to be understood literally, you find f.x. these places: 3/7b, 3/138a, 6/114ca, 11/1b, 15/1b, 17/12h, 18/1d-e, 18/2a, 19/97b, 20/113b+c, 24/34, 24/54j, 26/2a, 27/1b-d, 28/2, 36/69e, 37/117c, 39/28b, 41/3da, 43/2a, 43/3c, 43/29b, 44/2b-c, 44/13d, 44/58b, 54/17a, 54/22b, 54/32a+b, 54/40a, 65/11f, and 75/19 Worth remembering each time a Muslim or Islam tries to "explain" away errors, etc. by claiming the text means something different from what it says. In such cases either the Muslim/Islam lies when he/she claims the text means something different from what it says (the claim often is that it is a parable or something), or the Quran lies when it says that the book uses clear texts where nothing else is indicated.

The listed points are all collected under 3/7b and 44/58b.

Or perhaps Allah is so clumsy and helpless when he explains things, that he needs help from humans to explain what "he really means"? (Nonsense to say the least about such claims lying under such "explanations".)

WHO CAN EXPLAIN SOMETHING BETTER AND MORE CORRECTLY AND COMPLETELY THAN AN OMNISCIENT GOD?

#####033 54/32b: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” ##########Anyone wanting to try to “explain” away difficult points like mistakes or invalid logic or contradictions by calling them allegories etc. should read this sentence. It even is written 4 times only in this chapter, and thus a solidly cemented and nailed truth: The Quran is to be understood literally and search for hidden meanings is only for Allah, and such search only is for the ones “in whose hearts is perversity - - -.” . This is mentioned at least these places: 3/7, 11/1b, 19/97, 26/2, 41/3, 43/2, 44/2, 44/58, 54/17, 54/22, 54/32, and 54/40.

034 54/32c: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., and with a moral and an ethical code parts of which point to dark forces or worse?

035 54/32d: This verse is identical to 54/17 and 54/40 and quite like parts of 54/22 above. There is no doubt that by repeating it, Allah/Muhammad meant to strengthen the claim that the Quran to is be read straight forward and understood literally where not something else is indicated, this even more so as he repeated it several/many times (in different words) in the Quran.

036 54/33b: "The people of Lut (Lot*) - - -". It is very clear from both the Bible and the Quran that the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were not the people of Lot, even if he lived there.

037 54/34b: "We (Allah*) sent against them (Sodom and Gomorrah*) a violent tornado with showers of stones - - -". The Bible says burning sulfur (1. Mos. 19/24).

####038 54/40a: “And We (Allah*) have indeed made the Quran easy to understand - - -.” ##########Anyone wanting to try to “explain” away difficult points like mistakes or invalid logic or contradictions by calling them allegories etc. should read this sentence. It even is written 4 times and thus a solidly cemented and nailed truth: The Quran is to be understood literally and search for hidden meanings is only for Allah, and such search only is for the ones “in whose hearts is perversity - - -.” . This is mentioned at least these places: 3/7, 11/1b, 19/97, 26/2, 41/3, 43/2, 44/2, 44/58, 54/17, 54/22, 54/32, and 54/40.

There is no doubt whatsoever about that the Quran itself means that the Quran is to be understood literally mainly. And that to look for hidden meanings are wrong. Remind any Muslim trying to “explain” away problems by pretending or claiming they are allegories, about this fact.

039 54/40b: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., and with a moral and an ethical code parts of which point to dark forces or worse? By the way: Have you ever noticed how many points which are similar in those codes and in the corresponding codes in organized crime - f.x. the Mafia, Cosa Nostre, and the Chinese Triads?

040 54/41b: "To the people of Pharaoh, too, aforetime, came Warners (from Allah)". This indicates that prophets from Allah came to Egypt to teach Islam (but were opposed). There is no basis for such a claim, neither in the Bible, nor in science, nor in history, nor anywhere else outside the Quran. But it makes a nice parallel - one of many in the Quran - to Muhammad's own experiences (and thus a "documentation" for that his experiences were normal for prophets, and thus that he himself was a normal prophet).

041 54/42a: “- - - Our (Allah's) Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

042 54/42b: "(Allah*) exalted in Power". He in case has never proved his power - all is just words till now, even undocumented words. (It is here referred to what happened to the Egyptians, but according to the Bible - the only real(?) source - that was caused by Yahweh, not buy Allah (their teachings were so different basically, that they clearly are two different gods, in spite of Muhammad's never documented claims). 

043 54/42c: "- - - (Allah is*) able to carry out his Will". Sometimes claimed in the Quran, never proved anywhere.

044 54/47a: "Truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

045 54/47b: "Truly those in sin are the ones straying in mind, and mad". This sounds correct for a religious person, and actually for many others - until one remembers that words like "sin" in the Quran is meant in accordance with the book's own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical and immoral ethical code, and even partly unjust and immoral laws. Compare these to "do against others like you want others do against you", and you will see that in some cases the ones who are sinners according to the Quran, are the ones on or perhaps on the road to a good and benevolent god (if such one exists - f.x. Yahweh) in a normal religion.

046 54/48b: "The Day they (non-Muslims*) will be dragged through the Fire - - -". See 3/77b above.

047 54/51b: "- - - receive admonition - - -". From a book full of mistakes, etc., and with a moral and an ethical code parts of which point to dark forces or worse?

048 54/48d: "Taste ye (non-Muslims*) the touch of Hell!" See 3/77b above.

049 54/49a: "Verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

050 54/49b: "Verily, all things We (Allah*) created - - -". See 6/1e, 6/2b, 11/7a, 21/56c and 41/15f above.

051 54/50: "And Our (Allah's*) Command (when creating*) is but a single (act) - - -". But an act never proved - see the same as under 54/49b just above. Besides: If this claim is true, the god would have no problem creating Jesus - a son. Not to mention creating his rule without the necessity of raids and wars, like the Quran glorifies.

##052 54/51a: "And (oft) in the past have We (Allah*) destroyed gangs like onto you (the people of Mecca in this case*) - - -". A never proved pep-talk - good words to hear for his followers in lean times like it was for Muslims around 614 AD, when this surah was made. Besides: All the destruction and killing Muhammad boasts about to enlarge the picture of his claimed god, show the Yahweh with his puny wars to establish and defend a country for the Jews, was just an immature trainee in the business of war and killing - a bit sobering for some anti-Christians and anti-Jews talking about Yahweh's warlike sides for a period (and never even mentioning that his period of war was restricted both in area and time). For Allah the "land of war" is all the non-Muslim countries and areas, and lasting until the last non-Muslim is subdued. And remember: These are not antique words of the old - this always was and still is the official policy of Islam today.

053 54//52a: "All ye (humans*) do is noted in (their) Books (of Deeds) - - -". Why does an omniscient good need such books?

054 54/52b: "- - - Books (of Deeds) - - -". Why does an omniscient and omnipotent god use such a primitive means as books for noting down deeds and misdeeds if he after all needs to note it down? It would not be difficult to explain that gods had better means. But Muhammad(?) did not think over such things?

055 54/53a: "Every matter, small and great, is on record". It is a sobering sentence for the believers - "beware that angels note down everything you say and do" - but why so if Allah is omniscient and also predestines everything? It is another case if Islam is a made up religion - in that case it just is a sentence very sobering for the believers and thus efficient for Muhammad’s - and his successors' - control of the Muslims.

056 54/53b: "Every matter - - - is on record". Why does an omniscient god need to keep records?

057 54/54b: "- - - Righteous - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

058 54/54c: "- - - in the midst of Gardens and Rivers - - -". = In the Quran's and Islam's Paradise - an Arabism. See 10/9f above.

059 54/55a: “An Assembly of Truth - - -“. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. With so much wrong in the book and hence in the religion, this needs solid proof to be believed by us.

060 54/55b: "- - - a Sovereign Omnipotent (Allah*)". If he exists and is a major god with power - neither of which is ever proved. (And actually contradicted by the Bible by not even being mentioned there, neither Allah, nor any of his claimed prophets, except the Jewish ones "borrowed" from the Bible), nor the holy Mecca, nor the ultra holy Kabah. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

7762 + 60 = 7822 remarks. 

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".