1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 51

 

SURAH 51: AD-DHARIWAT (The Wind That Scatter)

(Mecca, 620 AD?)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 51/1-4: (A51/1): “By the (Winds (?*)) that scatter broadcast; And those that lift and bear heavy weights; And those that slow with east and gentleness; And those that distribute and apportion by Command - - -.” Anyone – anyone – who can give real and reliable information about what is meant here, will be famous all over the Islamic world, at least among the religious scholars. Nobody knows or understands anything – except that perhaps wind is included – but many guess. Likely it also is an oath as sentences starting with "by" in the Quran, normally are oaths. An exemplary clear language used by Allah (?) here.

003 51/2: (YA4988): “- - - and those who lift and bear away heavy weights - - -“. What does it mean? – rain? – clouds? - camels? – or whatever? Nobody knows.

004 51/3: (YA4989): “- - - and those that flow with ease and gentleness - - -.” Meaning ??? It may be the wind – it is just guessing, but a reasonable guess. Language “clear like ink and darkness.”

005 51/4: (A4990): “- - - and those that distribute and apportion by command - - -“. Unclear meaning. See 51/3 just above – and 51/1-4 and 51/2 above.

006 51/5a: "Verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See f.x. 2/2b or 49/13b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

007 51/5b: “(The Quran/Allah/Muhammad swears by 51/1 to 51/4 that) Verily what ye (Muslims*) are promised (in the Quran*) is true - - -“. With so many mistakes, etc. – and even obvious lies – in that book, also this oath hardly is true. Remember that in Islam oaths can be broken, if that gives a better result - at most you have to pay expiation to Allah for the broken oath (2/225a, 5/89a+b). It at least will need solid proofs.

008 51/5d: "- - - true - - -". See f.x. 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above - with all its mistakes, etc. the Quran at best is partly true only.

009 51/6a: "- - - verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See 2/2b above.

010 51/6b: "- - - Judgment and Justice - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral and ethical codes.

011 51/6c: "- - - verily - - -". See 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

012 51/7: "By the Sky - - -". Allah is swearing by the Sky - normally when a sentence in the Quran starts with "by", it is an oath. One of the 100% proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same gods, because Yahweh strictly says you shall not swear (Matt. 5/34), and as this is said via Jesus, it also proves that Jesus and Muhammad does not belong in the same group. Further the Bible makes it clear that if you all the same swear, you have to keep your oath, whereas Allah permits even oaths to be broken (2/225, 5/89, 16/91, 66/2) - another proof for the same.

013 51/8a: “Truly you (people/non-Muslims*) are in a doctrine discordant”. Some may be yes, some may be no - it depends on if and in case what god(s) exist(s). Among the ones in “may be yes discordant” are the Muslims, as all the mistakes and worse in the Quran prove absolutely that something is wrong with that book and that religion.

Besides: When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

014 51/8b: “Truly you (people/non-Muslims*) are in a doctrine discordant”. Contradicted by the Bible, at least as far as the followers of Yahweh go. Also see + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

015 51/9a: “Through which (non-Muslims*) are deluded (away from the Truth)”. As for truth, see 2/2b, 13/1g, and 40/75 above. Similar claims in 5/75 – 6/95 – 9/30 - 10/34 – 40/62. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. Actually it is proved that much is wrong, and thus that the Quran maximum is partly true.

And as the Quran is not from a god, who are deluded? - the non-Muslims or the Muslims (especially if Allah exists, but is from the dark forces, which f.x. parts of the Quran's moral code may indicate)?

016 51/9b: “Through which (non-Muslims*) are deluded (away from the Truth) such as would be deluded”. Non-Muslims believing in non-existing gods are deluded, but not if their god(s) (f.x. Yahweh) exist(s). Muslims are deluded if something is wrong with the Quran, and especially so if this means their claimed god is a made up one. We do not believe most Muslims wants to be deluded. They just are unable to see how much is wrong in the Quran, and that it thus is not from a god - and what is then Islam? They prefer explanations away, wishful thinking refuting and such ways out, instead of having to face the problem. As for refuting, the main thing is that someone refutes difficult points. Whether what the refuters say is true or not, does not matter much as long as it sounds ok - most Muslim lay people do not check this, even though one knows about facts like al-Taqiyya (lawful lies) Kitman (lawful half-truths) etc. (Because of Islam's somewhat special point of view on honesty, you should always check if what a Muslim says is true, especially in religious questions. Most Muslims are ok, but it is not a sin to lie to forward or defend the religion - - - or to cheat women or to save your money and some other topics. Actually when it comes to defending or promoting Islam - f.x. to get proselytes into the religion - it is advisable to use lies "if necessary" to get the result you want. (It had been interesting to know how many through the times - and through f.x. the last year - have ended in Islam because of some al-Taqiyyas and Kitmans? - and f.x. how many girls have been cheated in similar ways - to the bed or to a marriage where the real wish from the man is a work or residence permit.

##017 51/10a: "Woe to the falsehood-mongers - - -".

As the Quran is not from a god - too much is wrong - is Muhammad among them? He is, if not f.x. an illness - f.x. TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) - made him believe himself everything, included his lies (he lies at least a few places in the Quran), were true.

As the Quran is not from a god - too much is wrong - are the Muslims among them? They are, if they see the mistakes, etc. in the Quran, and all the same pretend they are not there.

If Muslims use al-Taqiyya (lawful lies), Kitman (lawful half-truths), broken/false oaths, etc., are they then among them? They are - lying and cheating are lying and cheating.

As "falsehood-mongers" in the Quran means all non-Muslims, this sentence also is part of the basis for the Quran's and thus Islam's moral code.

018 51/11b: "Those who (flounder) heedless in a flood of confusion - - -". Here is intended the non-Muslims. But as the Quran is full of wrong information, Muslims may flounder even worse - f.x. in the belief that it is right to kill people not floundering in the same ocean of mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, etc., and a likely made up religion.

019 51/12d: "- - - Justice - - -" A word which is difficult to use without reservations/comments about the Quran's moral, ethical and judicial codes.

###020 51/13a: "(It (the Day of Doom*) will be) a Day when they (people*) will be tried (and tested) over Fire!". Here are two possible meanings:

All humans are tested by means of fire at or after the Day of Doom. But this will contradict many points in the Quran - f.x. 51/15 below.

Perhaps it refers to the sinners only. But that in case may mean that their imprisonment in Hell just is a test and a trial, which again may mean that they will be released from Hell when the very long-lasting trial is over - in accordance with what is hinted at in 6/128c (comment A6/112 - English 2008 edition 112), 11/107b (A11/133 - English 2008 edition 11/134), 40/12 (A40/10), 43/74 (A43/54 English 2008 edition 43/53) - and here (A51/8) + in 78/23. Islam does not know. This extremely central point in Islam is not clear!! Clear texts in the Quran?

This is reckoned by many Muslim scholars to be one of the indications for that Hell is not (quite?) forever.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

021 51/13b: "- - - tried (and tested) - - -". Why - WHY - does a predestining, omniscient god need to try and test people!???

022 51/14a: "Taste ye (non-Muslims*) your trial (Hell*)!". But why - WHY - does a predestining, omniscient god need to try and test people!???

023 51/15b: "- - - Righteous - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral and ethical codes.

024 51/15d: "- - - Gardens and Springs - - -". The Quran's Paradise is a Paradise for dwellers of hot deserts - like in Arabia; water, shade, cool temperature, etc. For large parts of the world good weather like sunshine, good temperature, etc. would be Paradise. Allah is a god for Arabia, Sahara, etc. it seems. A god for the entire world had not nearly only used pictures relevant mainly for people from hot desert areas - Arabisms.

The large and fundamental differences between Yahweh's Paradise and Allah's one, are one of the strong proofs for that the two are not the same god.

025 51/16: "Taking joy in the good things their (Muslims'*) Lord (Allah*) gives them (in Paradise*) - - -". One should remember, though, that this just is a claim - like always in the Quran, no central points are proved.

026 51/18a: "- - - praying for - - -". But why and to what avail if Allah has predestined absolutely everything - in a Plan nothing can change? Because this is what the Quran states several places in the book. This is one of the problems with the Quran and with Islam: There are so many points which contradict each other - even very central points. No god had made such blunders.

027 51/18b: "- - - praying for Forgiveness - - -". See 51/17 and 51/18a above. In addition: Allah in any case can forgive nobody unless he exists and is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

024 51/20a: "- - - signs - - -". There nowhere exists nor ever were signs - not even one - clearly from Allah. See 2/39b above.

029 51/21: "Will ye (non-Muslims*) not then see?" The problem with non-Muslims is that too many of them see that something is hopelessly wrong in the Quran. The problem with Muslims is that they refuse to see this. (2 normal psychological defense mechanism may be activated: What has been impressed on you since you were a baby, and what all your surroundings tell you is true, is true - and everything else is untrue. And: It is too hard to face the possibility that main truths you have built your life on, are wrong - claims about this must be explained away as they are parts of the foundations you have built your life on.

###030 51/22a: "And in heaven is your (Muslims'/humans'*) Sustenance - - -". There are many claims in the Quran saying that Allah is behind your sustenance, and as many telling he is the ruler of Heaven, but all of them are just loose words and as loose claims. Nothing more. Not one proof. And such claims about their gods are normal and usual for religious charlatans and cheaters - normally calling themselves prophets or similar, and becoming the well off or/and often powerful leaders of sects, etc. like Islam in reality was in the start - a strongly heretical and apocryphal sect spun off from Jewism and Christianity mixed up with the old Arab paganism (most of the rituals, jinns, etc.) + traces from Persia (f.x. the houris, the handsome servants in Paradise, the bridge the Day of Doom, the scale for weighing god vs. bad deeds, etc.) and others. With a claimed holy book strongly apocryphal compared to the mother religions - and likely made up in the same way as other apocryphal texts: Made up to fit the leader's ideas and thinking. Except that in the case of the Quran, the "holy" book may partly or mainly derive from a mental illness (TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) according to modern medical science - - - or for that case from dark forces if one believe in such.

031 51/22b: "- - - as (also) that which you are promised (about Paradise)". When so many facts and claims in the Quran are wrong, and when no divine promises in the Quran is ever proved true or fulfilled, why should this be an exception unless it is proved? And there also is the sobering fact that there is not one proved case of Allah keeping a claimed promise - not once since time began. Lots of claims, but not one proved case. ("A proof is one or more proved facts which can give only one conclusion".)

Some other quotes about proofs and invalid or made up proofs:

"Strong claims need strong proofs.

"A claim without a proof may be dismissed without a proof".

"Claims are cheap, but only proofs are proofs".

"The use of invalid proofs normally proves that something is fishy".

"The cheat or deceiver naturally must rely on claims pretending to be facts or proofs".

"A made up "proof" makes the man very suspect".

"A strong belief is not a proof - not necessarily even a truth".

"Wrong claims and invalid "proofs" are working tools of the cheat".

"A student with correct facts gets a more correct answer than 20 professors with wrong facts". (Invalid, "signs", claims, "proofs", etc. of course are wrong facts.)

And we may add from Peer Gynt in his original language: "Naar utgangspunktet er som galest, blir resultatet tidt originalest" - freely translated: "When you conclude from wrong claims/wrong facts/invalid "proofs"/etc., you get wrong conclusions".

032 51/23b: "- - - the Lord (Allah*) of the heaven and the earth - - -". Often claimed, never proved - and big words are cheap.

033 51/23d: "- - - the very Truth". That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

#034 51/23e: "- - - as much as the fact that you can speak intelligently to each other". For one thing one more claim - like this - in a book overflowing of loose claims, mistakes and even some clear lies, is not necessarily true unless it is proved. For another: Is talk intelligent if what you believe are facts, in reality are fairy tales - perhaps made up by a man wanting power, and perhaps even a mentally sick man (TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy f.x.)? Words and claims are very cheap as long as you do not have to prove them - actually it is loose words and loose claims f.x. cheats and deceivers live from.

035 51/28c: "- - - wisdom and knowledge - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this it means knowledge about the Quran and Islam - other kinds of knowledge were "foreign knowledge", and of negative value. See 26/83a above.

036 51/30: “- - - He (Allah*) is full of Wisdom and Knowledge.” Not if he made the Quern. Also see 40/75 above.

037 51/32b: "- - - (deep) in sin - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word - sin - often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

038 51/33: "- - - (a shower of) stones of clay (brim stones)". Contradicted by the Bible which says a rain of burning sulfur (1. Mos. 19/24). Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

Muslims frequently claim this was from a volcanic eruption. From such an eruption you may get burning sulphur (like the Bible tells), but not clay stones (like the Quran claims). Clay ONLY is made in water. And also the period of volcanism in Arabia mainly ended some 400ooo years ago.

039 51/34b: "- - - trespasses (and also the corresponding "trespassers"*) - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses these words, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and when using them in a religious connection it means anything not in accordance with the Quran.

040 51/36a: "- - - found not there (Sodom and Gomorrah*) any just (Muslim) persons - - -". This was some 2500 years before Muhammad. You are free to believe there could be Muslims in Sodom and Gomorrah, and that f.x. Lot and for that case Abraham were Muslims. But neither science nor Islam has found any traces of Muslims or Islam or a book similar to the Quran older than 610 AD, when Muhammad started his preaching - and with the exception of the belief in Yahweh, also nothing remotely similar to Islam.

041 51/36b: "- - - just - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses this and closely related words, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust judicial code, to a large degree inhuman and immoral code of war, etc.

042 51/37a: “- - - Sign - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

043 51/38b: “- - - (- - - Sign) - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

044 51/40a: “So We (Allah*) took him (Pharaoh Ramses II*) and his forces, and threw them into the sea (where they drowned*)”. For one thing they were not thrown into the sea, they went themselves (according to the Bible and not opposed by other places in the Quran) out on the dry sea bed, and then the water returned), but for another: At least Ramses II himself did not die by drowning and he also did not die until some years later (in 1213 BC - Exodus was around 1235 BC according to science).

045 51/41a. "- - - the 'Ad (people) - - -". A tribe from old Arab folklore. It may or may not have existed (likely they did), but their end and the reason for it highly unlikely are like Muhammad tells - at least Islam will have to prove it to be believed by us.

046 51/44a: "- - - they (the Thamud tribe*) insolently defied the Command of their Lord (Allah*) - - -". If this happened, it happened sometime between Noah (perhaps 5ooo - 6ooo or more years ago (3600 BC?)) and Moses (around 1300 - 1400 BC). Neither science nor Islam has found any traces from Islam older than 610 AD. Believe this verse if you want.

047 51/44b: "- - - so the stunning noise (of an earthquake) sized them (the Talmud) - - -". For one thing the translator seems to have been a little dishonest here - according to our sources the words "(of an earthquake)" is not in the Arab original. For another "The Message of the Quran" translates it:"- - - the thunderbolt (plural in the Swedish edition*) of punishment - - -". And for the third neither earthquakes nor thunderstorms ever kills 100% of whole large tribes - earthquakes kills maximum 30%, except in low quality high-rise buildings, and thunderstorms in warm countries even less. Something is wrong in this story.

048 51/46a: "So (Signs*) were the People of Noah - - -". In case they were a sign, according to the Bible they were a sign for Yahweh - a god in many ways very different from Allah.

049 51/47a: "- - - We (Allah*) construct(ed*) the Firmament - - -". The fact that it is very wrongly described in the Quran, proves that something is wrong here: A constructor knows how his construction is constructed.

##050 51/47c: “- - - it is We (Allah*) Who created the vastness of space.” Here is a point which should be checked: According to one of our sources, the word which is used in Arab is “samaa” which means “sky”, whereas the Arab word for “universe” or “space” is “al-kawn”. Dishonesty tells so very much about Islam and (dis)honesty even today, and we find half truths or cases of al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) too often in Islamic media/books (though we had originally not expected it from a man like Yusuf Ali). Our source also is strengthened by the fact that Muhammad Asad (A51/30) admits that the literal meaning of the Arab texts is "the sky" - see 51/47d just below - so it seems to be true that the translation of the Quran here is falsified.

Sources we reckon to be reliable, also say that the Arab word for universe in the modern meaning, (al-kawn) is not at all used in the Quran. Also see 51/47d just below.)

There is some difference between the sky and the universe. Dishonesty like this you find a little too often in Islam.

As far as we can find out, here is used a dishonest translation, to make the Quran sound more correct. Also see 51/47d just below - it seems like this dishonesty is used frequently. "Samaa" in plural means "the (7?) Heavens", NOT the universe or "cosmic system", or something like that.

051 51/47d: (A57/30): "Literal meaning (of the word "samaa" is') "the sky" or "the heaven", which often in the Quran has the connotation of "universe" or in the plural ("the heavens"), of "cosmic systems". This is dishonesty, as these words used in the modern meaning of those words ("universe" and "cosmic systems") did not exist at that time in any relevant language included in Arab - a typical al-Taqiyya (lawful lie) or at best a Kitman (lawful half-truth), like the ones you find too many of in Muslim religious literature trying to adjust the Quran to modern knowledge or twist facts or words to pretend that here the Quran is foretelling modern knowledge - if our sources are correct, the Arab word for "universe"/"cosmos" is "al-kawn" and is not used in the Quran at all. Pure dishonesty. (Muhammad Asad in connection to this verse and also to 21/30 claims that the Quran here foretells the expanding universe, etc. The claim is so far out that we do not bother to comment on it).

NB:#######: Here it is not Muhammad who is lying in the Quran, though, but Muslim scholars. (There are a number of points in the Quran, where the translators have "adjusted" the texts in small ways like this, this even in the work of a top translator like A. Yusuf Ali - and what then about less honest translators? (Muhammad Ali after all is not too bad on this point).)

########Points like this tell a lot about Islam and Muslim scholars and their moral and reliability. Disgusting. Worse: Do lies in a religion lead followers to Paradise, if there is a next life?

052 51/48a: “And We (Allah*) have spread out the (spacious) earth - - -”. It is often claimed in the Quran that Allah created Earth, but there are nothing but claims for it. Actually the Quran proves that the claim is wrong: If Allah had created Earth, he had known it is a sphere, but the Quran tells it is flat - and actually that there are no 7 Earths (65/12) (one on top of the other according to Hadiths).

#053 51/49a: “And of everything We (Allah*) have created pairs - - -”. Very wrong. This only goes for multi-cellular beings, and not even for all of them – among primitive animals and even up to reptiles and fish you find some kinds that propagate - or may do so under special conditions - asexually, and thus do not make pairs. Uni-cellular beings are not in pairs, and there are by far many more of them both in species and in total numbers. The same goes for a large part of the plants (both sexes on the same plant and thus no pairs). Any god had known – Muhammad not. Who made the Quran?

#054 51/49b: “And of everything We (Allah*) have created pairs; that ye (people/Muslims*) may receive instruction”. Laugh or weep? - instruction from a god on basis of wrong information - see 51/49a just above!!?

##055 51/50: “I (Muhammad*) am from Him (Allah*) a warner to you - - -.” Here is one more of those really bad ones: Suddenly the book changes from Allah speaking to Muhammad speaking. But how is it possible for Muhammad to speak in a book that pretends to be billions of years old (from eternity – before the universe was created 13.7 billion years ago) or made by Allah in his heaven eons ago? Besides: Was Muhammad really from any god? At least his texts were not - too much wrong facts and other errors, etc.

##056 51/50-51a: “I (Muhammad*) am from Him (Allah*) a Warner to you (Muslims*), clear and open. And make not another (person/thing/idea*) an object of worship with Allah: I am from Him a Warner to you, clear and open!” Here is no “Say” or other indication for that Muhammad is quoting anything – he simply is speaking himself, forgetting he should pretend that he is quoting a copy of the Mother Book (13/39, 43/4, 85/21-22) made and revered in Heaven. Either that, or Allah has forgotten to say it – and how much else has he then forgotten? – or Muhammad forgot, and in case may have forgotten more.

Also a never proved claim.

057 51/50-51b: “I (Muhammad*) am from Him (Allah*) a Warner to you (Muslims*), clear and open. And make not another (person/thing/idea*) an object of worship with Allah: I am from Him a Warner to you, clear and open!” This is from Mecca 620. Muhammad is still military weak – and still only a warner. Later he became an enforcer (much of Arabia became Muslims on the point of the sword): This verse is contradicted and often “killed” by at least these verses: 2/191, 2/193, 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 4/90, 5/33, 5/72, 5/73, 8/12, 8/38-39 (the warning), 8/39, 8/60, 9/3, 9/5, 9/14, 9/23, 9/29, 9/33, 9/73, 9/123, 25/36, 25/52, 33/61, 33/73, 35/36, 47/4, 66/9. This includes many advising or permitting political, social, economical, etc. compulsion (with the sword in the background if you protest) – we mention a few here: 3/28, 3/85, 3/148, 4/81, 5/72, 5/73, 9/23, 14/7, 15/3, 33/73, 35/36. They are all quoted under 2/256. (At least 29 contradictions).

058 51/52: "- - - no messenger came to the Peoples (anywhere in the world*), but they said (of him (wrong, as there also were a few women like Miriam and Huldah*)) in like manner, 'A sorcerer or one possessed". This is wrong, as such accusations are not reported for a number of the Biblical prophets (and also not about f.x. David or Solomon, who also according to the Quran were prophets). But Muhammad was accused of this, and then it was good psychology to tell that this was normal for all prophets or messengers, and thus that Muhammad was a normal such one.

059 51/53b: "- - - transgressing - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses this and related words, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and when used in religious connection, it means anything not in accordance with the Quran.

060 51/55b: "- - - teaching (of Islam*) benefits the Believers". It might have done, if it had been from a god or if the information in it had been true, even if it was not from a god - well, not if it is from the dark forces. But even in that case only "might have been", as it is full of hate and superiority illusions against non-Muslims and in addition pretty bloody and teaching at least partly dishonesty (f.x. break your words/promises/oaths if that gives a better result and pay expiation if necessary afterwards).

061 51/56a: “I (Allah*) have only created jinns - - -". But are jinns really created? They have never ever provably manifested themselves in any way, and they after all just are beings borrowed from old Arab folklore, fairy tales, and pagan religion, and were not to be found other places than in and around Arabia - an Arabism.

062 51/56b: “I (Allah*) have only created jinns (never proved existing*) and men, that they may serve Me.” But:

7/179: “Many are the Jinns and men We (Allah*) have made for hell”.

A small contradiction. But what does 7/179 tell about Allah?

063 51/58a: "For Allah is He Who gives (all) sustenance - - -". Often claimed in the Quran - never proved. 

064 51/58b: "For Allah is - Lord of Power - - -". Never proved in case.

7562 + 64 = 7626 remarks.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".