1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 47

 

SURAH 47: MUHAMMAD

(622 AD. Perhaps partly in Medina, but at least verse 13 in Mecca)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 47/1c: "- - - the Path of Allah - - -". The claimed road to the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

003 47/1d: "- - - their (non-Muslims - here likely the Quraysh in Mecca*) deeds will Allah send astray - - -". Not possible unless Allah exists and is something supernatural.

004 47/2b: "- - - deeds of righteousness - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

005 47/2d: “- - - believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad - - -”. Was it really sent down? What is for sure is that it was not sent down from any god - no god delivers a book of that quality.

006 47/2e: “- - - for it (the Quran*) is the Truth - - -”. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. (Actually parts of it are proved wrong.) See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

007 47/2f: “- - - for it (the Quran*) is the Truth from their (Muslims‘*) Lord (Allah*) - - -.” Is it? No. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. No omniscient god ever was involved in a book of a quality like the Quran. See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

008 47/2g: "- - - He (Allah*) will remove from them (Muslims*) their ills and improve their condition". This is on par with much which is said in the Quran, but which has never been proved Allah did. Many Muslims got better economical conditions from stealing, robbing, extortion, and enslaving, but that was not Allah, but their own ill deeds - - - and #######neither Islam nor Muslims ever mention what price other humans had to pay for this, in the form of ruin, of ruined lives, of deaths. Muslims only see their own big heroes - they lack the necessary moral, and even the moral code, telling that others had to pay a too high price for their own life in luxury, and they lack the backbone to see the dark side.

009 47/3b: "- - - those who reject Allah follow vanities - - -". A neat way to explain away the disbelief he met? Or to explain away the fact that some saw that something was seriously wrong?

010 47/3e: "- - - the Truth - - -". That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

011 47/3f: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) from their Lord (Allah*) - - -”. Not if Allah is omniscient - too much is wrong in the book. See 13/1g + 40/75 above.

012 47/3g: "- - - thus doth Allah set forth for men lessons - - -". Allah can set forth nothing unless he exists - and if he does not exist, others has/have set forth a lot in his name. Such things have been done in the name of a god by self proclaimed prophets both before and after.

###013 47/4c: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them) - - -.” BUT OUR SOURCES TELL THAT THE WORDS “(in fight)” IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE ARAB TEXT – IT IS ADDED BY THE TRANSLATOR (and by more than one). Muslims primarily shall read the Quran in Arab, and there in case our sources are correct the text is: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers, smite at their necks - - -“. It in case simply is a permanent order to be aggressive.

The real religion of peace.

Al-Taqiyya is the name for "lawful lies" in Islam, and are advised to be used "if necessary" to defend or defend the religion. Is the "correction" here simply an al-Taqiyya?

####014 47/4d: This is a really serious one: “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them) - - -.” Try to find something like this in NT and the new covenant! One of the at least 200% sure proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - and for that Jesus and Muhammad not only are in the same religion or same line, but does not even belong in the same moral world.

015 47/4e: "- - - when ye (Muslims*) have thoroughly subdued them (non-Muslims*) - - -". "The religion of peace"? "Let there be no compulsion in religion"? When there are contradictions between glorifying words and dark reality, we always believe in the reality.

016 47/4h: "- - - He (Allah*) could certainly have exacted retribution from them (non-Muslims*) (Himself) - - -". This may be a bluff as there never was a single proved such case - numbers of claims, but never a proved case.

017 47/4i: "- - - but (He (Allah*) lets you fight) in order to test you - - -". Why - why does an omniscient and omnipotent god need to test his followers - he knows everything and predestines everything!? There is no logic in this sentence, unless it in reality is Muhammad who wants warriors and needs an explanation.

018 47/4j: "- - - but (He (Allah*) lets you fight) in order to test you - - -". There are so many ways of testing a person. Why did "the Religion of Peace" have to do it by raids and wars for wealth and slaves and power?!! There is no logic in this, too, unless the explanation is that in reality it was Muhammad who wanted warriors and needed to "explain" why "Allah wanted it".

#019 47/4k: “But those who are slain in the way of Allah - He (Allah*) will never let their deeds be lost.” "Make war for the religion of peace" and go to Paradise. But this only is true if Allah exists and is a major war god (only a war god rewards ill deeds, and makes them look god in the perpetrators' eyes - well, also devils do).

####Perhaps as bad: If the Quran is not true in everything and from a god, the slain ones - and others - are cheated (but Islam accepts cheating in wide cases, and Muhammad used it himself - perhaps also here.)

020 47/4l: (YA4824): “But those who are slain - - -“. But as the original Arab alphabet was incomplete, this word in Arab is possible to read in 2 ways: “qatalu” = “those who fight”, and “qatilu” = “those who are slain”. For us there is a difference between to be fighting and to be dead.

021 47/4m: "- - - He (Allah*) will never let their (slain warriors') deeds be lost - - -". If the Quran tells the truth, if Allah exists, if Allah is a major god of war (only gods of war and devils reward or "reward" ill deeds, and make them look good in the doers' eyes).

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

#####022 47/4n: (A47/4): "In other words, when "those who are bent on denying the truth (the Quran with all its mistakes, etc.*)', deprive the Muslims of their social and political liberty and thus make it impossible for them to live in accordance with the principle of their faith, a just war (jihad) becomes allowable and, more than that, a duty". In this connection it is very thought provoking that according to the Quran the principle of Islam includes that Muslims shall rule and everyone else suppressed and without political power or influence - and "paying jizya - extra tax - "with willing submission". This is the official and final goal for Islam according to the Quran. Think this over.

Also denial of burka, restrictions on other Muslim cultural customs, denial to accept points in Islam's moral code, etc., etc. may be seen as a reason for war and terror, at least by strong believers and by extremists. And we all have seen and heard what such ones may do.

For people or religions suppressed under Islam there are no similar rules.

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

023 47/5b: “Soon will He (Allah*) guide them (Muslims slain for Allah/Muhammad*) - - -". No-one is a reliable guide if his only guidebook is full of errors. Besides: Nice words, but never proved.

024 47/5c: “Soon will He (Allah*) guide them (Muslims slain for Allah/Muhammad*) and improve their conditions, And admit them to the Garden which He has announced for them”. Vague promises - it can of course be no less than Paradise, but you will find much more epic - and lyric - descriptions not much later. Allah quickly had found a good receipt - or perhaps Muhammad. Nice promises for the warriors and cheap promises for Muhammad. This claim/promise is invalid if the Quran is a made up book - and at least no god made a book of that quality.

NB: This is from 622 AD. If it is written in Mecca, it is meant as comfort to persecuted Muslims. If it is written in Medina (the surah likely mainly is from Mecca, but some verses likely from Medina), it may be the robber baron/robber god Muhammad/Allah who is/are speaking.

025 47/6b: "(Allah will*) admit them (dead Muslims*) to the Gardens which He announced for them". If Allah exists and is a major god, and the Quran tells the complete and only truth. If not it was Muhammad who announced it.

026 47/7b: “O ye who believe! If ye will aid (from the context it is clear it means in war*) (the cause of) Allah, He will aid you, and plant your feet firmly.” Seemingly a good deal. A strengthening of the morality of Muhammad's warriors. But the deal only is good for Muhammad and his successors - and the warriors cheated - if Allah does not exist or is not a god.

027 47/8a: "For those who reject (Allah) - for them is destruction - - -". Sure - but only if the Quran is from a god and in addition tells the full truth and only the truth. But no matter nice to hear for Muhammad's followers.

028 47/8d: "- - - (Allah) will send their (non-Muslims'*) deeds astray (from their mark)". Also this Allah cannot do unless he exists and is something supernatural. But as bad deeds according to the Quran may be good deeds according to especially NT and its new covenant (f.x. Luke 22/20), and the other way around - and the differences at places are huge - perhaps Yahweh will intervene?

029 47/9a: "- - - they (non-Muslims*) hate the Revelation of Allah (the Quran) - - -". Some may do so, as they see how dark the Quran is, and that it cannot come from a god with all those errors - and definitely not from a good god with that moral code. But most just wonder what is wrong with the intelligence and nature of man, which make it possible for millions to believe in a book where so much obviously and clearly is so seriously wrong that no god can be involved. And marketed by a man of that quality!

030 47/9b: "- - - Revelation - - -". It is revelations? - and in case from whom, as no god was involved in a book of that quality?

031 47/9c: "- - - Revelation from Allah - - -". No god ever was involved in making the Quran - it would be an insult, slander, and degrading heresy to blame an omniscient god for that quality.

032 47/10a: "Do they (non-Muslims*) not travel through the earth, and see what was the End of those before them (who did evil)?” In the Middle East there are scattered ruins – houses, villages, towns. Muhammad claimed – as normal without any proof – that they all were results of Allah’s punishment for disbelief and sins. But in an arid and harsh country which on top of all was settled by warlike inhabitants, there were many other reasons for empty houses. The statement that all were empty because of punishment for disbelief and other sins against Allah, need strong proofs from Islam to be believed.

033 47/10b: "- - - (- - - did evil) - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

034 47/11a: "- - - Allah is the Protector of those who believe (in him*) - - -". If we had a choice, we would prefer a protector who had proved his existence - not only have to rely on loose words from a man whom even the Quran and Hadiths, etc. describe as power-hungry, ruthless, unreliable, and a liar - if you read his demands and deeds, not his nice, but cheap and never proved words. In 1400 years there is not one single act which clearly is made by Allah - only words and claims from an unreliable man, greedy for power, for money for bribes - and for women. And later the blind belief in the words of the fathers (taqlid) for Muslims - the words insisting on that a book full of mistakes and from no god, represents the only god and salvation - kept the religion alive.

035 47/11d: "- - - (non-Muslims*) have no protector". We are back to what is said in the Bible - that Yahweh is a strong and reliable protector. If that is true, the Quran here is wrong for the followers of Yahweh (well, this may be in a "grey zone" as Muhammad wrongly mixed Yahweh up with Allah).

But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs. by the Bible: The Bible tells that Yahweh is a good protector for his followers. And also the Quran admits that Yahweh exists, even though it wrongly mixes him with Allah.

036 47/12b: "Verily Allah will admit (Muslims to his paradise*) - - -". The old fact: Not possible unless Allah exists and is a god. (Where will he admit them if he is from the dark forces?)

037 47/12d: "- - - do righteous deeds - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

038 47/12e: "- - - to Gardens beneath which rivers flow - - -". The Quran's and Islam's Paradise - see 10/9f above.

039 47/12g: "- - - eat as cattle eat - - -". Food and drink is necessary both in Paradise and Hell according to the Quran. In the Bible not a word is mentioned about such necessities - but then in Yahweh's Paradise you are resurrected as a spiritual being, not bodily.

One more proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - their hells and paradises both are too different.

040 47/13b: "- - - (- - - sins) - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

041 47/14a: “Is then one who is on a clear (Path) from his Lord, no better than one to whom the evil of his conduct seems pleasing - - -”. Like more or less all such questions in the Quran, this is rhetorical and with seemingly one possible logical answer only - one that is pleasing and flattering for all believers - - - and seemingly sobering for all proselytes.

042 47/14c: “- - - on a clear (Path) from his (a person*) Lord (Allah*) (= living according to the Quran) - - -“. The trouble is that as crooked, and of so doubtful clarity, as the Quran is, it does not represent a clear path.

043 47/14d: "- - - one to whom the evil of his conduct seems pleasing - - -". The expected person here is a non-Muslim. But look to Islamic history, moral and culture, and ask who has a religion where evil conduct may be "lawful and good" and pleasing? - compare to "do unto others like you want others do unto you", the sum of the Law and the prophets according to Jesus (Matt. 7/12), if necessary.

044 47/14f: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

045 47/15a: “(Here is) a parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: in it are rivers of water incorruptible; rivers of milk of which the taste never changes, rivers of wine (this surah is from 622 AD – around the flight to Medina) a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear. In it there are for them all kinds of fruits - - -.” Yes, like in Utopia or another earthly paradise dreamed up by the poor people in an arid land – or by someone else making dreams for them. A materialistic paradise, but here at least with added grace from Allah. And in Paradise Muslims seems to be permitted to drink wine – “a joy”.

046 47/15d: "- - - righteous - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

047 47/15e: "- - - promised (by Allah*) - - -". There is the black fact that till now - 1404 normal years after Muhammad started his mission - there never was a proved case of Allah keeping a promise.

048 47/15g: "- - - rivers - - -". There are 4 normal rivers in the Quran's Paradise - of these 2 flows on to Earth and become the Nile and the Euphrates according to Hadiths. Believe it if you want.

049 47/15h: "In it (Paradise*) there are for them (Muslims*) all kinds of fruits - - -". The Quran's paradise simply is the poor, uneducated desert warrior's dream about royal luxury and a big harem - - - and the god some thousands or more miles - 500 years of travel between each Heaven according to Hadiths - above (for km multiply by 1.6) according to Hadiths. Also see 10/9f above.

One of the strong proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, their paradise had been one and the same.

050 47/15i: “(Can those in such Bliss) be compared to such as shall dwell forever in the Fire - - -". This is what is called a leading Question - and leading questions often have seemingly clear answers. But in this case the seemingly obvious answer only is correct if the Quran is from a god, and if the Quran in addition tells the full truth and only the truth. Not to mention how wrong it is if there exist other gods - f.x. Yahweh - - - especially if on top of all the Quran and its god are made up f.x. by one or more cheater(s) or by the dark forces.

051 47/15l: "- - - dwell for ever in the Fire (Hell) - - -". Contradictions: 6/128a, 11/107b, 43/74c, 51/13c, and 78/23 all indicate that Hell may be is not for ever - and 11/108b that even Paradise is not quite for ever.

052 47/15m: "- - - given, to drink - - -". Also in Hell one needs food and drink - though what human being would even think about food or drink in that pain?.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

053 47/16b: “- - - those (Muslims*) who have received Knowledge (from the Quran*) - - -”. The Quran at best represents bits and pieces of knowledge, and it is difficult for uneducated people to know what is true and what not. See 40/75 and 41/12 and others.

054 47/16c: "- - - Knowledge (in this case the teachings of the Quran*) - - -". No book full of mistakes gives knowledge unless you know enough from before, to cut out what is not true and also what is doubtful and check if that is true. You have to be pretty naive, brainwashed, or uneducated - or blind - not to see that at least much of what is said in the Quran is not knowledge. Also see 26/83a above.

055 47/16d: "- - - Knowledge - - -". See 26/83a above.

056 47/16e: "- - - men whose hearts Allah has sealed - - -". "The lost sheep", "the 11. hour", etc. The same god as Yahweh like in the NT? "Nyet" - which is a good English word meaning a very strong NO.

057 47/17d: "- - - Guidance - - -". See 7/92a and 16/107b above.

058 47/17e: "- - - (- - - evil)". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

059 47/19a: "Know - - -". Also this is one of the words which cannot be accepted at face value in a book with so much wrong like in the Quran, unless there are additional proofs.

060 47/19b: "Know, therefore, that there is no god but Allah - - -". Well, at least there is the problem with the existence of the Jewish and Christian god, Yahweh, which both the Quran and the Bible claim exists, and which both the Quran and the Bible claims has proved his existence thoroughly. The Quran tries to solve the problem by claiming - as always without any documentation - that Yahweh is the same god as Allah, even though that obviously is not true, as the teachings fundamentally are too different.

But Allah has never proved his existence - or that he is a god. For him there only are the words and claims of a rather murky person going for power. What if he does not exist? Also see 2/255a, 6/106b, and 25/18a above.

Simply contradicted by among other books the Bible. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

061 47/19c: "- - - forgiveness - - -". Only 2 can forgive - the victim and a god. If Allah exists, is he a god? - there only is Muhammad's word for it - and Muhammad's word has limited value with among other facts his belief in dishonesty (al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie), Kitman (the lawful half-truth), etc. - both building on Muhammad’s words and deeds - "war is deceit"/"war is betrayal" (and "everything" jihad), "break even your oath if that gives a better result - pay expiation afterwards if necessary".

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

062 47/20c: “But when a surah of basic or categorical meaning is revealed, and fighting is mentioned therein, thou wilt see those in whose heart is a disease looking at thee with the look of one in swoon at the approach of death.” A mark on the ones not liking to fight was that they were sick - had a disease in their heart. But it is worth for others to remember that not all - far from all - are blood-thirsty.

But non-Muslims should remember that many Muslims are not blood-thirsty.

063 47/20-21: "- - - more fitting for them (the ones not wanting to go to war*) were it to obey - - -". Obey whom? Allah, of course! - which here on Earth meant obeying Muhammad. A nice sentence for any dictator.

064 47/20d: "- - - revealed - - -". Were surahs in the Quran really revealed? - and in case by whom, as texts with so many errors are not from a god?

065 47/20-21: "- - - more fitting for them (the ones not wanting to go to war*) were it to obey - - -". Obey whom? Allah, of course! - which here on Earth meant obeying Muhammad. A nice sentence for any dictator.

066 47/21a: “- - - it were best for them (the ones not strong in belief*) if they were true to Allah (= war).” That also is best also for you. But what did following the Quran mean? As it is not from a god, it does not mean being true to any god. True to dark forces? - or to men? - or to the robber baron and later warlord Muhammad?

067 47/21b: "- - - just - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust judicial code, etc.

068 47/21c: "- - - true to Allah". Not possible unless he exists and is something supernatural. If he does not exist, one only is cheating oneself - - - and giving power to one or more leaders. If he on top belongs to the dark forces, one also is cheating oneself, and likely with an even worse result.

069 47/22: This verse has different interpretation from different Muslim scholars, partly depending on who they think "you" are. Unclear.

070 47/23a: “Such are the men (non-Muslims making mischief*) whom Allah has cursed - - -”. And when Allah has cursed them, they of course are worthy of only despise - - - if Allah really exists and is able to curse anybody.

071 47/23c: "- - - He (Allah*) made them (sinners, non-Muslim*) deaf and blinded their sight". Compare to Yahweh and f.x. his "lost sheep" (Matt. 18/12-14). Yahweh the same god as Allah? Impossible.

#072 47/24a: "Do they (non-Muslims) not then earnestly seek to understand the Quran - - -". When we started to read the Quran, it was from an honest wish to understand - you do not understand a people and a culture, unless you understand their religion. But we found kilometers of mistaken facts and other errors. #########What we now very honestly do not understand, is how it is possible for at least educated people to read the Quran and not see that something is hugely and seriously wrong - no omniscient god makes mistakes and definitely not by the hundreds and more, and if the Quran is not from a god, what then is Islam??! And where will Muslims end if there is a next life?

073 47/25a: "Those who turn back as apostates - - - Satan has instigated them - - -". A nice and cozy explanation for his followers. More cozy for Muhammad to tell this, than the plain truth: That at least some of them had seen that something was horribly wrong with Muhammad's new religion.

074 47/25b: "- - - Guidance - - -". There is no real guidance in a book full of mistakes - so many that it on top of all cannot be from any god.

075 47/25c: "- - - Satan has instigated them (apostates from Islam*) and buoyed them with false hope". A good pep-talk and a good "explanation" to his - Muhammad's - followers. Much better than to admit they may be had seen that things were much wrong in Muhammad's teachings.

076 47/25d: "- - - Satan has instigated them (apostates from Islam*) and buoyed them with false hope". Or if Yahweh exists, it may have been he who instigated them with true hope?

077 47/26aa: "- - - they (people leaving Muhammad and his religion*) - - -". You meet Muslims telling that Islam is such a good religion that nobody leaves it. Here is a proof for that some did already at the time of Muhammad.

078 47/26c: "- - - what Allah has revealed - - -". Wrong. No god ever revealed a book of a quality like the Quran.

079 47/26d: "- - - revealed - - -". Is the Quran really revealed? - and in case by whom, as no god ever "sent down" a book that full of mistakes, etc.?

080 47/26e: "But Allah knows their (non-Muslim's or hypocrites*) (inner) secrets". See 2/233h and 35/38b above.

081 47/28b: "- - - the Wrath of Allah - - -". Something hypothetic if Allah does not exist or is not a major god. (Well, it may be real also if Allah belongs to the dark forces.)

082 47/28c: "- - - He (Allah*) made their (non-Muslims'*) deeds of no effect". This Allah could not do unless he exists. And as there are big differences in what is good and bad for Yahweh and for Allah, may be Yahweh liked them? Such big gaps as there are at many points between especially NT and the Quran, that easily would be possible.

083 47/30a: "Had We (Allah*) so willed - - -". This is a phenomenon you meet many times in the Quran: The book telling that if Allah just willed, he could have done this and this and this. But Allah never will. It is exactly similar to what one sometimes hears from children or youths or immature persons wanting to, but in reality unable to, impress the surroundings. Another word for it is "bluffing". Also see 14/19d above.

084 47/30c: "And Allah knows all that ye do". See 2/233h above.

085 47/31a: "We (Allah*) shall try you - - -". But why - why - why does an omniscient god have to try his followers? There is no logic in it - not unless this claim is a substitute for a real, but less popular reason, f.x. that Muhammad wanted warriors.

#####086 47/31d: This verse - and quite a number of others - does not give meaning if Allah is omniscient and knows everything. If he is omniscient, he also knows everything about you - he can learn absolutely nothing from testing you. Not to mention if he on top of all if he on top of all predestines everything, so that you just are a puppet in a puppet theatre reacting to his Plan only.

But if this is Muhammad needing an explanation for why he sends warriors out to steal and enslave and enlarge his power, then suddenly tales like these are logical - if his followers were naive enough or blind enough.

087 47/32b: "- - - the Path of Allah - - -". The claimed road to the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

088 47/32c: "- - - the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". See 63/5a above.

#089 47/32e: “- - - after Guidance (the Quran*) has been clearly shown to them (non-Muslims*) - - -”. = After they have been taught Islam. But there is not much guidance in a book with that much mistakes and cheating (trying to use invalid statements, “signs” and “proofs”). See 13/1g and 40/75 above. If there is some guidance some places, it in no way is “clear”.

090 47/32f: "- - - He (Allah*) will make their (non-Muslims'*) deeds of no effect". This Allah could not do unless he exists. And as there are big differences in what is good and bad for Yahweh and for Allah, may be Yahweh liked them? Such big gaps as there are at many points between especially NT and the Quran, that easily would be possible.

091 47/33b: "Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger (Muhammad*) - - -". Muhammad's standard, but never proved mantra to glue himself to his platform of power - here the mantra is in a very clear form.

092 47/33e: "- - - make not vain your (peoples'*) deeds - - -". If Allah does not exist, all your deeds for him are in vain - not to mention what they are if he belongs to the dark forces. If any other god exists, only the deeds you have done for that god will not be in vain concerning religion and a possible next life. 

093 47/34b: "- - - the Path of Allah - - -". The road to the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

094 47/34c: "- - - Allah will not forgive them (non-Muslims*)". Allah can neither forgive nor not forgive unless he exists and in addition is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

095 47/35c: "- - - Allah - - - will never put you in the loss for your (good) deeds". Often claimed, never proved. A good promise if everything the Quran tells about Allah is true. Cheating if the Quran is not from a god or for other reasons contains mistakes or similar - - - but a promise giving Muhammad power and cheap warriors no matter.

096 47/35d: "- - - (Allah*) will never put you in loss for your (Muslims'*) (good) deeds (on the battlefield*)". See 47/35b above - one more indication.

097 47/36a: "The life of world is but play and amusement (compared to the claimed next life*)". Often claimed, never proved. And even more: If there is a next life, all the errors, etc. in the Quran makes it highly unlikely that neither the rules for admittance, nor the next life are in accordance with the tales in the Quran.

098 47/36c: "- - - evil - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code and sometimes it’s partly unjust sharia laws.

099 47/36d: "- - - He (Allah*) will grant you (Muslims*) your recompense - - -". If he exists, if he is a god, and if he is powerful enough to do so - none of which was ever proved. And what the recompense will be if he belongs to the dark forces, is anybody's guess.

100 47/36e: "- - - and He (Allah*) will not ask you (to give up) your possessions." Just stop a little: Allah demands an average of 2.5% in zakat - tax - of all your possessions each and every year (if you are not too poor). VERY clearly contradicted and abrogated by many verses in the Quran.

101 47/37: "If He (Allah*) were to ask you - - -". The old, black fact: Allah can ask nobody anything unless he exists and is something supernatural.

102 47/38a: "- - - ye (Muslims*) are those invited to spend (of your substance) in the Way of Allah - - -". This was in 622 AD - before Muhammad started getting rich from stealing/robbing. He and/or the congregation needed money, etc.

103 47/38b: "Any who are niggardly (when giving to "Allah's cause*) are so at the expense of their own souls". Allah will remember it when you arrive in the claimed next world. A nice verse also for terrorists needing money for their deeds.

104 47/38c: "- - - (- - - the Path (of Allah*)) - - -". The road to the Quran's and Islam's paradise. See 10/9f above.

7228 + 104 = 7332 remarks.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".