1000+ Claims in the Quran - Invalid Unless Proven, Surah 46

 

SURAH 46: AL-AQAF (The Winding Sand-tracts)

(Mecca, 620 AD)

 

001  "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful". Please read the surahs from Medina, the immoral parts of the Muslim moral code, the unjust/immoral parts of sharia, and the Quran's rules for lying, thieving/looting, enslaving, raids and wars, plus the rules for treatment of girls and women - free and captives - and see if you agree. Always when there is a distance between words and corresponding demands and deeds, we personally believe in the demands and deeds. Glorious words are cheap, demands and deeds are reliable. Glorifying words and claims are too cheap for anyone to use and disuse - when you read, judge from realities, not from propaganda.

002 46/2a: “The Revelation of the Book (the Quran*) - - -.” Back to square one – is it revealed? – and in case from whom? - Not from a god (too much is wrong in the book), then from dark forces? - or from a sick brain (f.x. TLE - Temporal Lobe Epilepsy)? - or from a cold and scheming human brain (f.x. Muhammad’s)?

003 46/2c: "The Revelation of the Book (the Quran*) is from Allah - - -". In that case Allah has little knowledge - no omniscient god makes a book this full of errors. Not to mention reveres it as a "mother book" in his "home" (13/39b, 43/4b+c, 85/21-22).

004 46/2d: "- - - Allah the Exalted in Power - - -". Power he in case never clearly has shown.

005 46/2e: “(Allah is*) Full of Wisdom.” Not if the Quran is representative for it – too many mistakes, etc. See 13/1g and 40/75 above.

006 46/3a: ”We (Allah*) created - - -". Often claimed, never proved - extra interesting because if the Quran and/or the Bible tell(s) the truth on this point, Yahweh proved his ability to create. Also see 6/2b, 11/7a, 21/56c, 41/15f above.

007 46/3d: "- - - for just ends - - -.” See the Quran's partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust sharia laws, etc.

008 46/3h: "- - - those who reject Faith turn away from that whereof they are warned". Not strange as at least a number of them saw things were wrong in Muhammad's new religion.

009 46/4c: "Show me (Muhammad*) what it is they (pagan gods*) have created on earth, or have they a share in the heavens (plural and wrong*)?". And show us something Allah clearly has created on Earth - facts, not just loose claims. And has Allah really a share in Heaven - please proofs, not just strong, but cheap and invalid words. Muhammad always claimed proofs from others, so it is clear proofs are valuable - but he never was able to prove anything himself. (When Muslims claim it is primitive or something similar to ask for proofs for the Quran and Allah (because they are unable to provide proofs and in this way wants to evade the question), just remind them that Muhammad frequently asked for proofs from everyone else.)

010 46/4e: “Bring me (Muhammad*) a Book (revealed) before this (as a proof*) - - -“. Wrong. A book in itself proves nothing – it is as easy to falsify a book as it is to falsify speech. (F.x. the Quran can well be a falsification – made by Muhammad or someone (it at least is not a product from a god - contradicted by realities).) Actually this verse is naïve.

011 46/4f: "- - - knowledge - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it normally refers to religious and related knowledge. Other sciences - even medicine - were "foreign knowledge" and not good (f.x. most doctors in Muslim area through the early and medieval times were non-Muslims. Also see 26/83a above.

012 46/5a: "And who is more astray than one who invokes besides Allah such as will not answer him (also Allah has never clearly answered anybody - if Islam could prove such an unmistakable answer, you bet they had told about it*) to the Day of Judgment, and who (in fact) are unconscious to their call (on them)- - -". If the Quran is without mistakes and tells only and the full truth, all non-Muslims are astray. If there are mistakes in the Quran, then all Muslims are astray - because then the book is not from a god and Islam a false religion - (and most likely also a lot of non-Muslims are astray, as hardly all gods are real).

And if Allah is a made up god, also Islam is a made up religion.

014 46/6b: "- - - they (the false gods*) will be hostile to them (the pagans*) - - -". According to the Quran the pagan gods will be given life at the Day of Doom and reject their "followers".

015 46/7a: “- - - Our (Allah’s*) Clear Signs - - .” There are no clear signs from Allah in all the Quran – see 2/39b or 2/99 above.

016 46/7e: “- - - the Truth (the Quran*) - - -.” That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. See 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above. In reality all the errors in the book prove that it at most is partly true - and not from any god (no god makes hundreds and more mistakes in a small book).

017 46/8a: "He (Muhammad*) has forged it". Already at that time many saw that something was wrong. But Muhammad became too strong economically and military.

###018 46/8c: “Say: ’Had I (Muhammad*) forged it (the Quran*), then can ye obtain no single (blessing) for me from Allah.” What an unbeatable proof!!!

019 46/8d: "- - - (blessing) for me (Muhammad*) from Allah". Allah could not and cannot give blessing to anyone unless he exists and is a god. (Blessing from someone belonging to the dark forces, may hardly be a blessing).

020 46/8e: "He (Allah*) knows best that whereof ye (skeptics of Muhammad*) talk - - -". Allah knows everything according to the Quran, but why then 2/233h above?

021 46/8f: "And He (Allah*) is Oft-Forgiving - - -". Allah can forgive exactly nobody unless he exists and is a god.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

022 46/8g: "And He (Allah*) is - - - Most Merciful". See 1/1a above.

023 46/9c: "I (Muhammad*) am no bringer of newfangled doctrine among the Messengers - - -". Wrong. Muhammad's teachings fundamentally was so different from the prophets in the old Jewish line in story (the only ones of the prophets he meant, of whom there are other sources), in moral, in ethics, in religious basic thoughts, in judicial questions, that he very clearly is outside that line - far outside. This is especially clear when one compares with Jesus and his New Covenant (f.x. Luke 22/20) - a covenant Muslims never mention and one most of them have never heard about.

#####024 46/9e: "- - - nor do I (Muhammad*) know what will be done with me or with you". Muhammad was unable to know the future - to "see the unseen" - he was no "seer" (the original title for prophets according to the Bible - see 1. Sam. 9/9, 9/11, 9/18, 9/19, 2. Sam. 15/27, 1. Kings 17/13, 1. Chr. 9/22, 26/28, 29/29, 2. Chr. 16/7, 16/10, 19/2, 29/25, Micah 3/7) - no prophet. Many have liked the imposing title prophet through the times, and different definitions have been made for that title. But a prophet unable to make prophesies, is no prophet. 

This verse also is one of the proofs for that when Muslims claim Muhammad made prophesies, their claims are not true. There are a few more verses in the Quran proving the same, f.x. 6/50a, 7/188b, 10/20c-d,10/49a-b, 72/26. Together they are so strong, that Islam says "there is no miracle connected to Muhammad, except the Quran" (prophesying is a kind of miracle - "to be able to see the unseen"). But all the same mullahs, imams and others tell their congregations about the prophesies - and the miracles - of Muhammad, with the result that many lay Muslims honestly believe in it. Honesty in religion? But remember that lies for Islam often is not a sin!! (Al-Taqiyya - the lawful lie, Kitman - the lawful half-truth, etc. Specialties of Islam - you do not find similar in other ones of the big religions. One more proof for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

025 46/9i: "I (Muhammad*) follow but that (the Quran*) which is revealed to me - - -". No omniscient god revealed a book with so many errors like the Quran to Muhammad or to anyone else. It would be both an insult and heresy to accuse a god of such a product.

026 46/9j: "I (Muhammad*) follow but that (the Quran*) which is revealed to me by Inspiration - - -". Muhammad claimed he got most of his messages by inspiration - a most convenient means: Impossible for others to check, easy to subtract from, easy to add to, easy to make up convenient points. As Muhammad claimed to be in the Jewish tradition of prophets, we also add that the word "inspiration" never is mentioned in the Bible in such connections - also a difference between the old prophets and the self proclaimed prophet Muhammad.

027 46/10b: “If (this teaching) be from Allah - - -". No omniscient god ever backed a teaching based on so many errors.

###028 46/10c: “If (this teaching) be from Allah, and ye (non-Muslims) reject it, and a witness from among the Children of Israel testifies to its similarity (with earlier scriptures (what is Muhammad’s definition of “similarity” here?*)), and has believed (or pretended to believe - sometimes that was necessary to survive*) while ye are arrogant, (how unjust ye are) - - -”. This sentence is a bit complicated, but what Muhammad said, was that a Jew agreed – true or not true - to that the Quran was similar to old Jewish scriptures, and that non-Muslims then were unjust not accepting that Muhammad is a real prophet.

The logic here is invalid and wrong - when just one says something and many says something else all of them know about, normally the many are right - at least when debating known material. The way for Muhammad to prove his words had been to compare the two texts, something he for some reason or other did not do. Now Muslims may say that the old Jewish scriptures were falsified - the normal and proved wrong way out for Muhammad and for his followers - but one cannot at the same time say that the man's scriptures were falsified (Muhammad claimed the old scriptures were falsified, and that this was the reason why they differed from the Quran), and then say that the man proved the Quran right because he had read his own scriptures. (This is a typical Muslim way of "proving" things: One tells that one aspect of something must be like this and this - and overlook that other aspects with the case screams that things are wrong.)

1: Tales like this are quite common among self proclaimed prophets trying to prove their new religion or sect. They may be true or not true.

2: We only have Muhammad’s word for this - a man who had initiated or himself done a lot of dubious deeds included lying/betrayal, and on top of that had a lot to gain from making people believe him, a man who lusted for power - and one who was teaching a dubious tale. There are no other sources. The tale may be true or not true.

3: We do not know how many Jews lived in the neighborhood of Mecca/Medina. But in only one tribe he destroyed, there were some 700 men (all murdered – in Khaybar. Plus the 29 from the peace delegation he invited and murdered earlier). As families tended to be large, that should mean some 2ooo-3ooo women and children in addition (all made slaves). And there were three big tribes (and some small ones), and thus thousands of Jews - and the women at least here cannot be omitted, as they tend to be more religious than men. It would be most surprising if not one or a few of them wanted to humor the power-that-be or really changed the religion - from belief or greed or fright or other reasons.

4: But all the other – thousands and thousands - of Jews said Muhammad was wrong. This even when he marched against them with his army, and they knew that to humor him meant “no war”. Even when they had to give him all their farms and become day workers for him - still knowing that humoring him meant they would keep their possessions if they in time had humored him. Even those who had to flee, losing everything they could not carry - knowing that if they humored him, they could stay. Not to mention the 700 men of the Qurayza tribe - knowing they were murdered by the half-dozens through the day and far into the night, and that humoring him perhaps could save their lives. All said no; Muhammad was too wrong to be possible to accept even then.

5: Even if it was correct that one or a few Jew said yes - which well may be true: “One swallow makes no summer”. (It also may be a made up story - that often happens in new sects to "prove" they are right.)

All in all: This “proof” has no value. According to the Jews Muhammad was very wrong. And even more: We still have the same books of Moses - the Torah was unabridged for at least some 1000 years before Muhammad and still is according to science – and the rest of the Jewish Bible (mainly the OT) that the Jews in Arabia had. Anyone can read this and see they were right.

#029 46/10d: (A46/12): "(This refers to*) 'a prophet like himself'". This is quoted from a speech Moses made to his fellow Jews. There are nearly identical quotes in 5. Mos. 18/15 and 18/18. Islam and Muslims claim the word "brothers" refers to Arabs, even though obviously the brother of a Jew is another Jew, even though the connections of the texts, the fact that OT nearly always meant other Jews when talking about the "brothers" of some Jews, the fact that Arabs and Jews never are named or indicated to be brothers neither in the Bible nor in the Quran, etc. - obviously a wrong claim judging from the contexts. See the text about "Samples of claims about Muhammad in the Bible" under 7/157e above. The claim is based on a strong need to find Muhammad in the Bible, as the Quran wrongly states he is foretold there, not is reality. But if Muslims do not find him there, the Quran is wrong once more, and Islam cannot afford mistakes in the Quran - it means that something is wrong with Islam. (Remember in addition that Muhammad in reality was no real prophet - he was unable to make prophesies - the claim is nonsense).

030 46/10f: "- - - truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim. See f.x. 2/2b and 45/3a above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b, 67/9c - a strong one - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

031 46/10g: "- - - Allah guides not a people unjust". Allah is no good guide for anyone if his guidebook is the Quran with all its errors, etc.

032 46/10i: "- - - unjust". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

033 46/11d: "- - - (this Message (the Quran*)) - - -". Is it really a message? And in case from whom, as no god ever was involved in a book of that quality?

034 46/11e: "This is an (old) falsehood". There were good reasons for saying so - everybody saw that Muhammad's stories just were twists on old stories, and many saw that things were wrong. But the robber baron and later warlord Muhammad became too strong and forced a foothold for his religion on the people - a foothold they rapidly enlarged, mainly by weapons or money or permission to steal/rob/enslave.

035 46/12b: “- - - this Book (the Quran) confirms (it (the Torah*)) - - -”. See 46/10c above, and especially the last lines. No one knew or knows the Torah better than the Jews. The quote is wrong - the books of Moses are a bit harsh, but far from as harsh as the Quran, and in addition there are lots of basic divergences. The Quran is no confirmation of the Books of Moses - easy to check for anyone able to read. Many similarities as Muhammad tried to copy those books, but too many and too deep differences. And remember: Both science and Islam have been unable to prove any falsifications in the Bible, included in the Torah - some mistakes, but no falsifications.

036 46/12g: "- - - unjust - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, its partly unethical ethical code, its partly unjust judicial code, etc.

037 46/12h: “- - - Glad Tidings - - -.” Wrong. Islam is no glad tiding, except for the ones not suppressed – and really glad only for the ones looking for booty and slaves and stolen riches, and not least for the ones near the top of the pyramid who got – and get – a lot of power in addition. It often is like that in war religions, especially when made to fit a strong and charismatic leader (and his successors), though many war religions have not been as hypocritical as Islam in trying to make its members and others believe it is good and just and humane and benevolent. And well, it may have been glad tidings also for the minor percentage of people that need a religion to lean on – at least for the possible ones where the old pagan religion was not strong enough. But for the majority of people no. Even not for the majority of the Muslims.

038 46/12j: "- - - do right". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is meant in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

039 46/13a: "Verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See f.x. 2/2b and 45/3a above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

040 46/13d: "- - - on them (Muslims*) shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve (in the possible next life*)". Correct if Allah exists, is a major god and is correctly descried in the Quran. Wrong if not.

041 46/14c: "- - - dwelling therein (Paradise*) (for aye) - - -". Verse 11/108c may indicate that it is not quite forever - Muslim scholars are unsure what that verse really means.

042 46/14d: "- - - (good) deeds". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like they, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code and partly unethical ethical code.

043 46/15c: "- - - work righteousness - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

044 46/15d: "- - - truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim. See 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b, 67/9c - a strong one - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

045 46/16a: "- - - the best of their (Muslims’*) deeds - - - ill deeds". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

046 46/16d: “- - - a promise of truth (the words of the Quran concerning Paradise*) - - -”. See 13/1g and 40/75 - the promise of Paradise is part of it.

047 46/16e: "- - - truth - - -". see 2/2b, 13/1g and 40/75 above.

048 46/17b: “For the promise of Allah is true.” That may be - if he exists (there is not one single proof, and the number of tries with invalid proofs, etc., make no good impression, as that normally is the hallmarks of cheats and deceivers). But there are good reasons for doubt, as the only source for information is the Quran, and very much there is not correct - or doubtful. In a way worse: There never was a proved case of Allah keeping a promise. Lots of claims, but not one proved case - nowhere and never. (The best proof for this, is Islam's silence on this point.)

049 46/17c: "This is but tales of the ancient". They may well have been correct - there is little or nothing in the Quran which is not "borrowed" from other sources - and most of the stories in the book are from unreliable sources (f.x. little if anything from the real Bible, which "en passant" both science and Islam (against their wish) have proved not falsified) - legends, apocryphal (made up) scriptures, folklore, and even fairy tales.

###050 46/19b: "And to all (humans*) are (assigned) degrees according to the deeds which they (have done), and in order that (Allah) may recompense their (peoples'*) deeds (good or bad ones*) - - -". In Heaven there are several gardens - 4 or 6 or more according to Hadiths - plus there are the higher heavens for the really top Muslims. To be able to place each person in the right place, they have to be given degrees of goodness and split in groups to be sent to the correct place in the 7 Heavens/Paradise.

One topic here you NEVER hear Muslims mention, is how the claim that you will have your wife/wives, children and family around in Paradise, can be fulfilled, unless absolutely all of them get the same degree as you and thus merit the same garden and Heaven like you. You may be a good Muslim and get grade 4. But two of your sons were killed in battle for Muhammad/Allah and automatically goes to the best parts part of the ordinary Paradise, say grade 6, and one black sheep of a son just sneaks into Heaven and the lowest degree, a plains 1. Your other 3 sons get satisfying 3s and 4s, whereas your daughters are good girls and get 4s and 5s, but their husbands only makes 2s and 3s. Obvious things like such results of human nature are never - never - mentioned when the nice and populist promises are made about you are going to have your family around you in Paradise. Never mentioned neither by the Quran, as far as we know neither by Hadiths, and definitely not by Muslims debating religion with non-Muslims, or by mullahs or imams or others trying to tease you to become a Muslim.

051 46/19c: "- - - injustice - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust judicial code, etc.

052 46/20d: "Ye (non-Muslims and bad Muslims*) received your good things in the life of the world, and ye took your pleasure out of them: but today (the Day of Doom*) shall ye be recompensed with a Penalty of humiliation (Hell*) - - -". This is the Quran's standard way of even out and of explaining why some bad people had good lives, whereas good Muslims often had lousy lives: The bad ones had wanted - and Allah had granted them (there is nowhere explained how this is possible to combine with Allah's total predestination according to an unchangeable Plan) - a good life now, but they have to pay in the next life. Good and soothing to know for the poor ones - your own success is good, but other people's downfall is not too bad either. It also is a warning: Be good and obedient and do not end like the bad ones.

###Also the big differences between the Bible's and the Quran's hells are more than big and many and fundamental enough to prove that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god - if they had been, also their hells had been more or less identical.

053 46/20f: "- - - without a just cause". But some or many had a just cause: They saw that something was seriously wrong with the Quran and thus with Muhammad and with his religion.

054 46/20g: "- - - just - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, partly unethical ethical code, partly unjust judicial code, etc.

055 46/20h: "- - - transgressed - - -". This word and the corresponding word "transgressor" normally are used in claimed cases of religious transgression. But beware that when the Quran uses words like these, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

####056 46/21a: "Hud". A prophet Muhammad and the Quran claimed once lived in Arabia. There exists no trace from him outside the claims in the Quran. He in case was a self proclaimed prophet with problems similar to Muhammad's and was used by Muhammad to show his own followers that former prophets had been disbelieved, too, and that thus Muhammad's situation was normal for prophets. There is a Muslim rumor that there is a chance for that he is the same person as the little known Biblical person Eber. In that case he was the great great grandson of Noah "at a time when the forefathers of the Jews were Arabs living in south Arabia before some of them emigrated to Mesopotamia, where among others Abraham was born (in Ur of the Chaldeans according to the Bible*)". It is a kind of fun when you read about ideology and/or religion and/or nationalism, etc. to see how many - and especially populists - tries to grab honor from wherever they can find it - there is no reason to believe Abraham's forefathers were Arabs.(The quote here is freely translated from Swedish after A6/47 - comment to verse 6/65).

It is extra ironic when you know that for one thing the Arabs are not a coherent tribe/people, but a mixture made up from people who drifted into the peninsula from all the lands around, and for another when you know that the interior of Arabia was settled roughly around the times of Abraham's forefathers - people drifted into Arabia then, and did not emigrate from there.

######BESIDES: HOW COULD ABRAHAM BE THE FORFATHER OF THE ARABS IF ARABS WERE HIS FORFATHERS? (Muslims sometimes are so eager to win points and honor for the religion and themselves, that they forget to think over the consequences of their claims - like here.)

057 46/21b: "'Ad". A tribe from old Arab folklore. It may or may not have existed, but if it existed, it is little likely they came to an end the way Muhammad - as normal without the slightest proof - claimed. The Quran claims Hud was their prophet. If they existed, it according to the Quran was sometime between Noah and Moses. Beware that unless there was very long time between 'Ad and Thamud, this is wrong. (According to history sources there existed a Thamud tribe somewhere around 800 - 400 BC. Note that the Quran places also Thamud before Moses (around 1200 BC) and Abraham (around 2ooo - 1800 BC.) Wrong according to history.)

058 46/21e: "Truly - - -". Definitely not a proved truth - only a not proved claim. See f.x. 45/3a above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b, 67/9c - a strong one - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

059 46/22c: "Hast thou (Hud*) come in order to turn us (the people of 'Ad*) aside from our gods?" An exact parallel to questions Muhammad got - "ergo" Muhammad's problems were normal for prophets, and thus Muhammad had to be a normal prophet. Good for his followers to "know". Most stories in the Quran about claimed or real(?) prophets were made into parallels to Muhammad's situation, and thus "documented" that his situation was normal for prophets, and that he thus was a normal prophet.

060 46/23b: "- - - Knowledge - - -". See 26/83a above.

061 46/23c: "- - - ignorance - - -". As for words related to knowledge, see 26/83a above.

062 46/25a: "Thus We (Allah*) recompense those given to sin". If Allah exists and is a major god.

063 46/25b: "- - - sin". Beware that when the Quran uses expressions like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral and unethical moral and ethical codes.

064 46/26a: "And We (Allah*) had firmly established them (the 'Ad tribe*) in a (prosperity and) power which We have not given to you (ye Quraysh) - - -". When you read the Quran, it is striking that more or less always when Allah destroys a people, it was a more rich and powerful people than Muhammad's contemporary Arabs. It made his already omniscient god and also the impression on Muhammad's Arabs greater - but did an omnipotent god need to become greater?

065 46/26c: "- - - the Signs of Allah - - -". Wrong. There never existed signs clearly showing Allah - if one had ever existed, you bet Muslims had told you.

066 46/27a: "We (Allah*) destroyed aforetime populations around you (people) - - -" - leaving the ruins, the empty buildings, the legends and fairy tales about former people. All of which Muhammad claimed - of course no proofs - were destroyed and killed because of sins against Allah. Believe it if you want. No matter: Allah was and is a bloody god.

067 46/27b: “- - - Signs - - -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39b above.

068 46/28a: "Why then was no help forthcoming to them from those whom they worshipped as gods, besides Allah - - -". Add one disturbing fact: Why is there not one proved case anywhere in the world through 1400 years and more of help from Allah? - many claims, but not one proved case.

069 46/28b: "- - - gods, besides Allah - - -". See 25/18a above.

070 46/28e: "- - - falsehood - - -". Beware that when this word is used in normal ways in the Quran, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code.

071 46/28f: "- - - (pagan gods*) were their (non-Muslims'*) invention". A relevant question here is: Whose invention is the Quran, as it is not from any god? - and whose invention is Allah if he just is a fiction in a book full of errors, etc.? (This last question may be extra relevant here, as Allah originally was the pagan Arab god al-Lah/Allah and perhaps Hubal (see second part of 1/1d) whom Muhammad renamed slightly to only Allah, and claimed was his monotheistic only god.)

##072 46/29a: "- - - Jinns - - -". A being "borrowed" from old Arab folklore and local pagan religion - an Arabism. You never find it in the Bible, even though Muhammad claimed it to be the same god and the same basic religion. Jinns were/are physical beings - created from fire (or from excessively hot wind is said one place), not spirits. (Fire is something physical - to be reasonably exact it is smoke so hot that it emits light, and Jinns are thus made from hot smoke. Jinns also can marry humans according to the old Islamic laws - something which would be difficult if they were not material. NB: No such marriage has ever provably happened. Also note here that they "returned to their people" - their fellow Jinns - and not to "their fellow spirits": They had their main similarities to people, even though they were invisible.)

073 46/29c: "- - - (- - - sin)". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this, it is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code. We also may mention that just this word often covers very different deeds, acts, words, and thoughts in the Quran and Islam, than in more normal religions (Islam is a religion of war - in spite of its loud slogans), not to mention how much its meaning in the Quran often differs from the basic of all human moral; "do against others like you want others do against you". Read the surahs from Medina and weep.

One small remark: As Yahweh's religion and f.x. moral code at many points are totally different from Allah's, you may qualify for Yahweh's Paradise even if Muslims condemn you to Hell - if both exist. One more of the 100% proofs for that Yahweh and Allah are not the same god.

074 46/30c: “We (some Jinns*) have heard a Book (the Quran*) revealed after Moses, confirming what came before it - - -”. Jinns were beings “borrowed” from Arab fairy tales, legends and from the old Arab pagan religion – Muhammad mostly based his world on the (contorted) Biblical legends - - - and on Arab traditions (the rest of the world made little or no traces in Allah’s religion – nothing from Europe, Africa, the Americas or Australia f.x. But may be the uneducated, warlike Arabs had done things almost correct in most of the religious aspects in their pagan religion? – only the Arabs of the ones without a Book?).

075 46/30e: "- - - confirming what (Torah, Bible*) came before it (the Quran*) - - -". As for confirming the Torah and also the Bible: See 40/75 and 46/10.

076 46/30g: “- - - it (the Quran*) guides men to the Truth - - -”. Can a lot of mistakes, contradictions, wrong logic, and even a few clear lies guide somebody to the truth? And: That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact - actually it is proved at least partly wrong.

077 46/30h: "- - - the Truth - - -" If it refers to the real Books of Moses, perhaps most of it is true (there are some mistakes, especially concerning genesis). But If it refers to a claimed earlier version of the Quran like Muhammad often - no documentation (surprised?) - claimed, it must be remarked that the Quran at best can be partly true. Also see 13/1g and 40/75 above.

078 46/30i: "- - - a Straight Path". The road to Allah and the Quran's Paradise. Also see 10/9f above.

079 46/31b: "- - - hearken to the one who invites (you) to Allah (Muhammad*) - - -". A dangerous deed if Allah does not exist, or even worse; if he exists, but is from the dark forces.

080 46/31c: "- - - hearken to the one who invites (you) to Allah (Muhammad*) - - -". This "proved" to his followers that even Jinns listened to Muhammad!

081 46/31f: "- - - believe in Him (Allah*) - - -". See 46/31b above.

082 46/31g: "He (Allah*) will forgive you (people*) your faults - - -". Only 2 can forgive: The victim and a god. Is Allah a god - if he exists? There only is a claim from a man with dubious moral, but a liking for power, wealth for bribes, and for women, which tells this.

As for forgiving from Allah: See 2/187d above.

083 46/32b: "- - - cannot frustrate (Allah's Plan) on earth - - -". The predestination again - what Allah has planned and decided, nobody and nothing can change (f.x. prayers, forgiving, free will?).

084 46/32c: "- - - no protection can he (non-Muslim*) have besides Allah - - -". Contradicted by the Bible, which says Yahweh is a good protector. Also see 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones. But of course it is ok for Islam to prove - prove - the Bible wrong and the Quran right. But as we say: Prove, not just loose claims and as loose and invalid words like the Quran always use instead of proofs.

085 46/32e: "- - - such (non-Muslim*) men (Islam is a men's religion*) (wander) in manifest error". Not if the god they believe in - f.x. Yahweh - exists, and especially not if Allah on top of that is a made up god (quite likely, as the Quran is a made up book, or at least not from any god, with all its errors).

086 46/32g: "- - - error - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses words like this in religious connection like here, it partly is in accordance with its own partly immoral moral code, and partly in accordance with the Quran's unreliable texts - f.x. full of mistakes.

087 46/33c: "- - - Allah - - - is able to give life to the dead - - -". See 7/158i above.

088 46/33d: "Yea, verily He (Allah*) has power over all things". He in case never has proved his power - there only are words and claims, both of which are cheap.

089 46/33e: "- - - verily - - -". It definitely is no proved verity/truth. See 2/2b above.

When used in the Quran words like "true", "truth", "truly", "sure" "surety", "surely", "verity", "verily", etc. are claims, not proved facts. Also see 2/2b + 13/1g and 67/9c - 2 strong ones - and as for contradictions to the Bible also 40/20b. Also the latter half of the comments to 41/39a is very relevant. These and similar words cannot be taken at face value unless they are proved.

090 46/34d: “Is this not the Truth? (= what was told in the Quran*)”. That the Quran is the truth, is just a claim, not a proved fact. With all its mistakes etc. the Quran at best is partly true.

091 46/34h: "- - - ye (non-Muslims*) were wont to deny (truth)". Wrong, at least in some cases: They simply saw that much was seriously wrong in the Quran, and lived according to (may be) the real truth.

092 46/35e: "- - - the (Punishment) promised them (non-Muslims*) - - -". See 3/77b above.

093 46/35h: "- - - the Message (the Quran*) - - -". But is it really a message, as it is from no god? In case from whom?

094 46/35j: "- - - transgress - - -". Beware that when the Quran uses this word - and also the word "transgressor - it normally means religious transgressing = everybody/everything not in accordance with the Quran and also with the Qurans partly immoral moral, ethical, judicial, and other codes.

7134 + 94 = 7228 remarks.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Not formed like questions for proofs, but what needs to be proved normally easy to see all the same. And: References you do not find here, go to "1000+ Comments on the Quran".


>>> Go to Next Surah

<<< Go to Previous Surah

This work was upload with assistance of M. A. Khan, editor of islam-watch.org and the author of "Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery".